Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPECIAL LAWS
Presidential 6ecree No. (7(3 (0 e 2aw on Arson) Republic Act No. 7979 (0o3ic #ubstances and !a9ardous and Nuclear 5aste 1ontrol Act o$ (99% Republic Act No. )2%7 (Ato"ic ;nergy Regulatory and 2iability Act o$ (97<) Republic Act No. 723) (Anti+!i=ac&ing 2aw) Presidential 6ecree No. )32 (Anti+piracy and Anti+ ig way Robbery 2aw o$ (978) Presidential 6ecree No. (<77 as a"ended (6ecree 1odi$ying t e 2aws on .llegal and ?nlaw$ul Possession* Manu$acture* 6ealing in* Ac@uisition or 6isposition o$ /irear"s* A""unitions or ;3plosi-es)
ii. 0 ereby sowing and creating a condition o$ widespread and e3traordinary $ear and panic a"ong t e populace iii. .n order to coerce t e go-ern"ent to gi-e in to an unlaw$ul de"and Note: /or t e cri"e o$ terroris" to be co""itted t ere$ore* it "ust be e"p asi9ed t at all t e ele"ents "ust be present and not in t e alternati-e. 0 e essential ele"ents t at "ust be present are4 COMMISSION OF CRIME A 1o""ission o$ t e predicate cri"es speci$ied in #ection 3 o$ t e !#A COMMUNAL PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITION A Acts enu"erated under #ection 3 o$ t e law "ust sow and create a condition o$ widespread and e3traordinary $ear and panic a"ong t e populace
UNLAWFUL DEMAND A 1o""itted $or t e purpose o$ coercing t e go-ern"ent to gi-e in to an unlaw$ul de"and
Any person w o* not being a principal under Article (7 o$ t e Re-ised Penal 1ode or a conspirator as de$ined in #ection 8 ereo$* cooperates in t e e3ecution o$ eit er t e cri"e o$ terroris" or conspiracy to co""it terroris" by pre-ious or si"ultaneous acts shall suffe the !e"alt# of f o$ se%e"tee" &'() #ea s* fou $o"ths o"e +a# to t,e"t# &-.) #ea s of /$! /so"$e"t0
4 and e-aluate co"plaints against t e actuations o$ t e police and law en$orce"ent o$$icials in t e i"ple"entation o$ t is Act.
4 . #!!lica2le 5uris!rudence
#out ern !e"isp ere ;ngage"ent Networ&* .nc.* et al. -s. Anti+0erroris" 1ouncil* et al.* G.R. No. (7<))2* (7<))8* (7<)<(* (7<<9%* (79()7* (7987(. Dctober )* 2%(%. /acts4 #e-eral petitions $iled be$ore t e 1ourt c allenged t e constitutionality Republic Act No. 9372 (RA 9372) on t e ground t at it was intrinsically -ague* i"per"issibly broad and -iolati-e o$ t e ci-il liberties ens rined in t e Gill o$ Rig ts o$ t e $unda"ental law o$ t e land. .ssue4 5 et er or not it is per"issible $or t e 1ourt to conduct a -agueness analysis o$ R.A. No 9372 Ruling4 ND. Petitioners a-e establis ed neit er an actual c arge nor a credible t reat o$ prosecution under RA 9372. ;-en a li"ited -agueness analysis o$ t e assailed de$inition o$ Hterroris"I is t us legally i"per"issible. 'udicial power neit er conte"plates speculati-e counseling on a statute,s $uture e$$ect on ypot etical scenarios nor allows t e courts to be used as an e3tension o$ a $ailed legislati-e lobbying in 1ongress.