Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Validity of Capital Asset Pricing Model & Stability of Systematic Risk (Beta). An Empirical Study on Indian Stock Market
PAYAL B. BHATT 127700592008 YESHA B. MANKAD 127700592067 MBA Sem III SUBMITTED TO
JAYSUKHLAL VADHAR INSTITUTE OFMANAGEMENT STUDIES JAMNAGAR AFFILITED TO: GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
Further, difficulties crop up when attempts to devise a definition for FMCG. The problem arises because the concept has a retail orientation and distinguishes between consumer products on the basis of how quickly they move at the retailers shelves. The moot question therefore, is what industry turnaround threshold should be for the item to qualify as an FMCG.
Products which have a quick turnover, and relatively low cost are known as Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG). FMCG products are those that get replaced within a year. Examples of FMCG generally include a wide range of frequently purchased consumer products such as toiletries, soap, cosmetics, tooth cleaning products, shaving products and detergents, as well as other non-durables such as glassware, bulbs, batteries, paper products, and plastic goods. FMCG may also include pharmaceuticals, consumer electronics, packaged food products, soft drinks, tissue paper, and chocolate bars.
The FMCG market is set to treble from US$ 11.6 billion in 2003 to US$ 33.4 billion in 2015. Penetration level as well as per capita consumption in most product categories like jams, toothpaste, skin care, hair wash etc in India is low indicating the untapped market potential. Burgeoning Indian population, particularly the middle class and the rural segments, presents an opportunity to makers of branded products to convert consumers to branded products.
Industry Classification
The FMCG industry is volume driven and is characterized by low margins. The products are branded and backed by marketing, heavy advertising, slick packagingand strong distribution networks. The FMCG segment can be classified under the premium segment and popular segment. The premium segment caters mostly to thehigher/upper middle class which is not as price sensitive apart from being brandc o n s c i o u s . T h e p r i c e s e n s i ti v e p o p u l a r o r ma s s s e g me n t c o n s i s t s o f c o n s u me r s belonging mainly to the semiurban or rural areas who are not particularly brandconscious.
History of FMCG
Fast moving consumer goods (FMCG), also known as consumer packaged goods (CPG) are the products that have a quick turnover and relatively low cost. Consumers generally put less thought into the purchase of FMCG than they do for any other products.
The Indian FMCG industry witnessed significant changes through through 1990's. Many players had been facing severe problems on account of increased competition from small and regional players and from slow growth across its various product categories. As a result, most of the companies were forced to revamp their product, marketing, distribution and customer service strategies to strengthen their position in the market.
By the turn of 20th century, the face of Indian FMCG industry had changed significantly. With the liberalization and growth of economy, the Indian customer witnessed an increasing exposure to new domestic and foreign products through different media, such as television and the Internet. Apart from this, social changes such as an increase in the number of nuclear families and the growing number of working couples resulting in increased spending power also contributed to the increase in the Indian consumer's Personal consumption. The realization of the customer's growing awareness and the need to meet changing requirements and preferences on account of changing lifestyles required the FMCG producing companies to formulate customer-centric strategies. These changes have a positive impact, leading to the rapid growth in the FMCG industry. Increased availability of retail space, rapid urbanization and qualified manpower also boosted the growth of the organized retailing sector.
HUL led the way in revolutionizing the product, market, distribution and service formats of the FMCG industry by focusing on rural markets, direct distribution, creating new product, distribution and service formats. The FMCG sector also received a boost by the government led initiatives in the 2003 budget such as setting up of excise free zones in various parts of the country that witnessed firms moving away from outsourcing to manufacturing by investing in the zones.
Though the absolute profit made on FMCG products is relatively small, they generally sell in large numbers and so the cumulative profit on such products can be large. Unlike some industries, such as automobiles, computers and airlines FMCG doesn't suffer from mass layoffs ever time the economy starts to dip. A person may put off buying a car but he Willnot put off having his dinner.
Unlike other economy sectors, FMCG share float in a steady manner irrespective of global market dip, because they generally satisfy rather fundamental, as opposed to luxurious needs. The FMCG sector which is growing at a rate of 9% is the fourth largest sector in the Indian economy and is a worth of Rs. 93000 crores. The main contributor, making up 32% of the sector, is the south Indian region. It is predicted that in the year 2010, the FMCG sector will be worth Rs.143000 crores. The sector being one of the biggest sectors of the Indian economy provides upto 4 million jobs.
The
FMCG
sector
consists
of
the
following
categories:
Personal care- Oral care, Hair care, Wash (soaps), Cosmetics and Toiletries, Deodorants and perfumes, Paper products (Tissues, Diapers, Sanitary products) and Shoe care; the major players being Hindustan Uni-liver Limited, Godrej Soaps, Colgate, Marico, Dabur and Procter & Gamble. Household Care - Fabric wash (laundry soaps and detergents), Household cleaners (Dish/utensil/floor/toilet cleaners), Air fresheners, Inseticides and Mosquito repallants, Metal polish and Furniture polish; the major players being HinduatnUni-liver Limited, Nirma and Ricket Colman. Branded and Packaged Foods and Beverages - Health beverages, Soft drinks, Staples/Cereals, Bakery products (Biscuits, Breads, cakes), Snack foods, Chocolates, Ice-creams, Tea, Coffee, Processed fruits, Processed vegetables, Processed Meat, Branded flour, Bottled water, Branded rice, Branded sugar, Juices; the major players being Hindustan Uni-liver Limited, Nestle, Coca-Cola, Cadbury, Pepsi and Dabur. Spirits and Tobacco - The major players being ITC, Godfrey, Philips and UB.
Formula:
where:
is the expected return on the capital asset is the risk-free rate of interest such as interest arising from government bonds
is the sensitivity of the expected excess asset returns to the expected excess market returns, or also ,
is the expected return of the market is sometimes known as the market premium (the difference between the expected market rate of return and the risk-free rate of return).
The relationship between and required return is plotted on the securities market line (SML), which shows expected return as a function of . The intercept is the nominal risk-free rate available for the market, while the slope is the market premium, E(Rm) Rf. The securities market line can be regarded as representing a single-factor model of the asset price, where Beta is exposure to changes in value of the Market. The equation of the SML is thus:
It is a useful tool in determining if an asset being considered for a portfolio offers a reasonable expected return for risk. Individual securities are plotted on the SML graph. If the security's expected return versus risk is plotted above the SML, it is undervalued since the investor can expect a greater return for the inherent risk. And a security plotted below the SML is overvalued since the investor would be accepting less return for the amount of risk assumed.
Asset Pricing:
Once the expected/required rate of return is calculated using CAPM, we can
compare this required rate of return to the asset's estimated rate of return over a specific investment horizon to determine whether it would be an appropriate investment. To make this comparison, you need an independent estimate of the return outlook for the security based on either fundamental or technical analysis techniques, including P/E, M/B etc.
Assuming that the CAPM is correct, an asset is correctly priced when its estimated price is the same as the present value of future cash flows of the asset, discounted at the rate suggested by CAPM. If the estimated price is higher than the CAPM valuation, then the asset is undervalued (and overvalued when the estimated price is below the CAPM valuation). When the asset does not lie on the SML, this could also suggest mis-pricing. Since the expected return of the asset at time is
, a higher expected return than what CAPM suggests indicates that time is too low (the asset is currently undervalued), assuming that at
the asset returns to the CAPM suggested price. using CAPM, sometimes called the certainty equivalent pricing
RESEARCH PROBLEM
The model assumes that the variance of returns is an adequate measurement of risk. This would be implied by the assumption that returns are normally distributed, or indeed are distributed in any two-parameter way, but for general return distributions other risk measures (like coherent risk measures) will reflect the active and potential shareholders' preferences more adequately. The model assumes that all active and potential shareholders have access to the same information and agree about the risk and expected return of all assets (homogeneous expectations assumption).
The model assumes that the probability beliefs of active and potential shareholders match the true distribution of returns. A different possibility is that active and potential shareholders' expectations are biased, causing market prices to be informationally inefficient. This possibility is studied in the field of behavioral finance, which uses psychological assumptions to provide alternatives to the CAPM such as the overconfidence-based asset pricing model of Kent Daniel, David Hirshleifer, and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam.
REVIEW OF LETERATURE
1) The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) is the standard risk-return model used by most academicians and practitioners. The underlying concept of CAPM is that investors are rewarded for only that portion of risk which is not diversifiable. This non-diversifiable risk is termed as beta, to which expected returns are linked. The objective of the study is to test the validity of this theory in Indian capital market & the stability of this non diversifiable risk (i.e. systematic risk or beta). The study has used the data of 10 stocks & 10 sectoral indices listed on the BSE, for a period of 4 years (January 2005 to December 2008) for the analysis. The studies provide evidence against the CAPM hypothesis. And finally, the studies also provide the evidence against the stability of systematic risk.
2) H. Jamal Zubairi, ShaziaFarooq Department of Finance and Accounting College of Business Management, Karachi :
The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and Arbitrage PortfolioTheory (APT) have been commonly used techniques in the global investing community for calculating the required return of a risky asset. This paper investigates whether CAPM and APT are valid models for determining price/return of the fertilizer and the oil & gas sector companies listed on the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE). The purpose of the research is also to identify plausible reasons for deviations from the theories. The conclusions arrived at through data analysis reveal weak correlation between realized excess returns (i.e. actual returns over and above the risk free rate) and the expected return based on CAPM. With respect to APT model, the study reflects that macroeconomic factors including changes in GDP, inflation, exchange rate and market return do not serve as valid determinants of returns on oil, gas and fertilizer stocks.
4) Abu Hassan Md Isa and Chin-Hong Puah and Ying-Kiu Yong (2008):
This paper examines the applicability of CAPM in explaining the risk-return relation in the Malaysian stock market for the period of January 1995 to December 2006. The test, using linear regression method, was carried out on four models: the standard CAPM model with constant beta .The standard CAPM model with timevarying beta .The CAPM model conditional on segregating positive and negative market risk premiums with constant beta .As well as the CAPM model conditional on segregating positive and negative market risk premiums with time varying beta . Empirical results indicate that both the standard CAPM models are statistically insignificant. However, the CAPM models conditional on segregating positive and negative market risk premiums (Model III and Model IV) are statistically significant. In addition, this study also discovers that time varying beta provides better explanatory power.
5) Chandra ShekharBhatnagar,RiadRamlogan :
The Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Black (1972) Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is considered one of the foundational contributions to the practice of finance. The model postulates that the equilibrium rates of return on all risky assets are a linear function of their covariance with the market portfolio. Recent work by Fama and French (1996, 2006) introduce a Three Factor Model that questions the real world application of the CAPM Theorem and its ability to explain stock returns as well as value premium effects in the United States market. This thesis provides an out-of-sample perspective to the work of Fama and French (1996, 2006). Multiple regression is used to compare the performance of the CAPM, a split sample CAPM and the Three Factor Model in explaining observed stock returns and value premium effects in the United Kingdom market. The methodology of Fama and French (2006) was used as the framework for this study. The findings show that the Three Factor Model holds for the United Kingdom Market and is superior to the CAPM and the split sample CAPM in explaining both stock returns and value premium effects. The real world application of the CAPM is therefore not supported by the United Kingdom data.
The Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Black (1972) Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is considered one of the foundational contributions to the practice of finance. The model postulates that the equilibrium rates of return on all risky assets are a linear function of their covariance with the market portfolio. Recent work by Fama and French (1996, 2006) introduce a Three Factor Model that questions the real world application of the CAPM Theorem and its ability to explain stock returns as well as value premium effects in the United States market. This thesis provides an out-of-sample perspective to the work of Fama and French (1996, 2006). Multiple regression is used to compare the performance of the CAPM, a split sample CAPM and the Three Factor Model in explaining observed stock returns and value premium effects in the United Kingdom market. The methodology of Fama and French (2006) was used as the framework for this study. The findings show that the Three Factor Model holds for the United Kingdom Market and is superior to the CAPM and the split sample CAPM in explaining both stock returns and value premium effects. The real world application of the CAPM is therefore not supported by the United Kingdom data.
This paper is solely based on the fact that in order for the model to be valid and strong academically, the alpha (the intercept) should equal to zero and the beta (the slope) should equalthe excess returns on the market portfolio. This was a pure prediction of the CAPM, therefore wetested the above hypotheses but the results failed to prove or provide any evidence that coincide with the null hypotheses! The second part of this investigation was to examine the ability of the CAPM
model to provide a non-linearity relationship between the return and betas. Conducting the test has shown that the expected return-beta relationship is linear. In fact, this paper has gone too far by also including a brief investigation over whats called the non-systematic test. The idea behind this was to investigate whether the CAPM can include allthe components of the stocks returns including the residual variance of the stocks. Our results based on the test for the nonsystematic risk-show that the residual risk has no effect on the expected returns of the listed stocks!
STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS
Ho:
H1:
SAMPLE DESIGN
TYPES OF RESEARCH DAT A COLLECTION METHOD STASTICAL TOOLS SAMPLE UNITS
Descriptive Research Secondary data Appropriate statistical tools will be applied FMCG Industry (10 Companies)