Introduction

The exchange rate is a key financial variable that affects decisions made by foreign exchange investors, exporters, importers, bankers, businesses, financial institutions, policymakers and tourists in the developed as well as developing world. Exchange rate fluctuations affect the value of international investment portfolios, competitiveness of exports and imports, value of international reserves, currency value of debt payments, and the cost to tourists in terms of the value of their currency. Movements in exchange rates thus have important implications for the economys business cycle, trade and capital flows and are therefore crucial for understanding financial developments and changes in economic policy. Timely forecasts of exchange rates can therefore provide valuable information to decision makers and participants in the spheres of international finance, trade and policy making. Nevertheless, the empirical literature is skeptical about the possibility of accurately predicting exchange rates. In the international finance literature, various theoretical models are available to analyze exchange rate behavior. While exchange rate models existed prior to 1970s (Nurkse, 1944; Mundell, 1961, 1962, 1963), most of them were based on the fixed price assumption. With the advent of the floating exchange rate regime amongst major industrialized countries in the early 1970s, a major advance was made with the development of the monetary approach to the exchange rate determination. The dominant model was the flexible price monetary model that gave way to the sticky price and portfolio balance model. While considerable amount of empirical work was devoted to testing these monetary models, most of them focused on in-sample tests that do not really give the true predictive accuracy of the models. Following this, the sticky price or overshooting model by Dornbusch (1976, 1980) evolved,
1|Page

which has been tested, amongst others, by Alquist and Chinn (2008) and Zita and Gupta (2007). The portfolio balance model also developed alongside, which allowed for imperfect substitutability between domestic and foreign assets, and considered wealth effects of current account imbalances. With liberalization and development of foreign exchange and assets markets, variables such as capital flows, volatility in capital flows and forward premium have also became important in determining exchange rates. Furthermore, with the growing development of foreign exchange markets and a rise in the trading volume in these markets, the micro level dynamics in foreign exchange markets have increasingly became important in determining exchange rates. Agents in the foreign exchange market have access to private information about fundamentals or liquidity, which is reflected in the buying/selling transactions they undertake, that are termed as order flows (Medeiros, 2005; Bjonnes and Rime 2003). Thus microstructure theory evolved in order to capture the micro level dynamics in the foreign exchange market (Evans and Lyons, 2001, 2005, 2007). Another variable that is important in determining exchange rates is central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market.

2|Page

India has been operating on a managed floating exchange rate regime from March 1993, marking the start of an era of a market determined exchange rate regime of the rupee with provision for timely intervention by the central bank. Indias exchange rate policy has evolved overtime in line with the global situation and as a consequence to domestic developments. 1991-92 represents a major break in policy when India harped on reform measures following the balance of payments crisis and shifted to a market determined exchange rate system. As has been the experience with the exchange rate regimes the world over, the Reserve Bank as the central bank of the country has been actively participating in the market dynamics with a view to signaling its stance and maintaining orderly conditions in the foreign exchange market. The broad principles that have guided Indias exchange rate management have been periodically articulated in the various Monetary Policy Statements. These include careful monitoring and management of exchange rates with flexibility, no fixed target or a preannounced target or a band and ability to intervene, if and when necessary. Based on the preparedness of the foreign exchange market and Indias position on the external front (in terms of reserves, debt, current account deficit etc), reform measures have been progressively undertaken to have a liberalized exchange and payments system for current and capital account transactions and further to develop the foreign exchange market.

3|Page

Exchange Rates and Exchange Rate Policy in India: A Review

Indias exchange rate policy has evolved over time in line with the gradual opening up of the economy as part of the broader strategy of macroeconomic reforms and liberalization since the early 1990s. In the post independence period, Indias exchange rate policy has seen a shift from a par value system to a basket-peg and further to a managed float exchange rate system. With the breakdown of the Bretton Woods System in 1971, the rupee was linked with pound sterling. In order to overcome the weaknesses associated with a single currency peg and to ensure stability of the exchange rate, the rupee, with effect from September 1975, was pegged to a basket of currencies till the early 1990s. The initiation of economic reforms saw, among other measures, a two step downward exchange rate adjustment by 9 per cent and 11 per cent between July 1 and 3, 1991 to counter the massive draw down in the foreign exchange reserves, to install confidence in the investors and to improve domestic competitiveness. The Liberalised Exchange Rate Management System (LERMS) was put in place in March 1992 involving the dual exchange rate system in the interim period. The dual exchange rate system was replaced by a unified exchange rate system in March 1993. The experience with a market determined exchange rate system in India since 1993 is generally described as satisfactory as orderliness prevailed in the Indian market during most of

4|Page

the period. Episodes of volatility were effectively managed through timely monetary and administrative measures. An important aspect of the policy response in India to the various episodes of volatility has been market intervention combined with monetary and administrative measures to meet the threats to financial stability while complementary or parallel recourse has been taken to communications through speeches and press releases. In line with the exchange rate policy, it has also been observed that the Indian rupee is moving along with the economic fundamentals in the post-reform period. Moving forward, as India progresses towards full capital account convertibility and gets more and more integrated with the rest of the world, managing periods of volatility is bound to pose greater challenges in view of the impossible trinity of independent monetary policy, open capital account and exchange rate management. Preserving stability in the market would require more flexibility, adaptability and innovations with regard to the strategy for liquidity management as well as exchange rate management. With the likely turnover in the foreign exchange market rising in future, further development of the foreign exchange market will be crucial to manage the associated risks.

5|Page

Structure of the Indian Foreign Exchange Market and Turnover

Prior to the 1990s, the Indian foreign exchange market (with a pegged exchange rate regime) was highly regulated with restrictions on transactions, participants and use of instruments. The period since the early 1990s has witnessed a wide range of regulatory and institutional reforms resulting in substantial development of the rupee exchange market as it is observed today. Market participants have become sophisticated and have acquired reasonable expertise in using various instruments and managing risks. The foreign exchange market in India today is equipped with several derivative instruments. Various informal forms of derivatives contracts have existed since time immemorial though the formal introduction of a variety of instruments in the foreign exchange derivatives market started only in the post reform period, especially since the mid-1990s. These derivative instruments have been cautiously introduced as part of the reforms in a phased manner, both for product diversity and more importantly as a risk management tool. Recognizing the relatively nascent stage of the foreign exchange market then with the lack of capabilities to handle massive speculation, the underlying exposure criteria had been imposed as a prerequisite. 7Trading volumes in the Indian foreign exchange market has grown significantly over the last few years. The daily average turnover has seen almost a ten-fold rise during the 10 year period from 1997-98 to 2007-08 from US $ 5 billion to US $ 48 billion. The pickup has been particularly sharp from 2003-04 onwards since when there was a massive surge in capital inflows. It is noteworthy that the increase in

6|Page

foreign exchange market turnover in India between April 2004 and April 2007 was the highest amongst the 54 countries covered in the latest Triennial Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Derivatives Market Activity conducted by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). According to the survey, daily average turnover in India jumped almost 5-fold from US $ 7 billion in April 2004 to US $ 34 billion in April 2007; global turnover over the same period rose by only 66 per cent from US $ 2.4 trillion to US $ 4.0 trillion. Reflecting these trends, the share of India in global foreign exchange market turnover trebled from 0.3 per cent in April 2004 to 0.9 per cent in April 2007. With the increasing integration of the Indian economy with the rest of the world, the efficiency in the foreign exchange market has improved as evident from low bid-ask spreads. It is found that the spread is almost flat and very low. In India, the normal spot market quote has a spread of 0.25 paisa to 1 paise while swap quotes are available at 1 to 2 paise spread. Thus, the foreign exchange market has evolved over time as a deep, liquid and efficient market as against a highly regulated market prior to the 1990s.

7|Page

Exchange Rate Regime

Exchange Rate systems are classified traditionally into 2 categories, namely: systems with a fixed exchange rate and systems with a flexible exchange rate. In the former system the exchange rate is usually a political decision, in the latter the prices are determined by the market forces, in accordance with demand and supply. These systems are often referred to as Fixed or hard Peg and Floating systems. But as usual, between these two extreme positions there exists also an intermediate range of different systems with limited flexibility, usually referred to as soft pegs.

Fixed Exchange Rate

Here a currency's value is matched to the value of another single currency or to a basket of other currencies, or to another measure of value, such as gold. This makes trade and investments between the two countries easier and more predictable, and is especially useful for small economies where external trade forms a large part of their GDP. It can also be used as a means to control inflation. However, as the reference value rises and falls, so does the currency pegged to it. In addition, according to the MundellFleming model, with perfect capital mobility, a fixed exchange rate prevents a government from using domestic monetary policy in order to achieve macroeconomic stability

The main criticism of a fixed exchange rate is that flexible exchange rates serve to adjust the balance of trade. When a trade deficit occurs, there will be increased
8|Page

demand for the foreign (rather than domestic) currency which will push up the price of the foreign currency in terms of the domestic currency. That in turn makes the price of foreign goods less attractive to the domestic market and thus pushes down the trade deficit. Under fixed exchange rates, this automatic rebalancing does not occur. Governments also have to invest many resources in getting the foreign reserves to pile up in order to defend the pegged exchange rate. Moreover a government, when having a fixed rather than dynamic exchange rate, cannot use monetary or fiscal policies with a free hand. For instance, by using reflationary tools to set the economy rolling (by decreasing taxes and injecting more money in the market), the government risks running into a trade deficit. This might occur as the purchasing power of a common household increases along with inflation, thus making imports relatively cheaper. Additionally, the stubbornness of a government in defending a fixed exchange rate when in a trade deficit will force it to use deflationary measures (increased taxation and reduced availability of money), which can lead to unemployment. Finally, other countries with a fixed exchange rate can also retaliate in response to a certain country using the currency of theirs in defending their exchange rate.

Floating Exchange Rate

Here supply and demand sets the exchange rate. For example, if more people want to buy euros, and sell dollars to do so, the value of the euro rises in response, while the value of the dollar relative to the Euro falls in forex trading. There are two ways the price of a currency can be determined against another. A fixed, or pegged, rate is a rate the government (central bank) sets and maintains as the official exchange rate. A set price will be determined against a major world
9|Page

currency (usually the U.S. dollar, but also other major currencies such as the euro, the yen, or a basket of currencies). In order to maintain the local exchange rate, the central bank buys and sells its own currency on the foreign exchange market in return for the currency to which it is pegged. If, for example, it is determined that the value of a single unit of local currency is equal to USD 3.00, the central bank will have to ensure that it can supply the market with those dollars. In order to maintain the rate, the central bank must keep a high level of foreign reserves. This is a reserved amount of foreign currency held by the central bank which it can use to release (or absorb) extra funds into (or out of) the market. This ensures an appropriatemoney supply, appropriate fluctuations in the market (inflation/deflation), and ultimately, the exchange rate. The central bank can also adjust the official exchange rate when necessary Unlike the fixed rate, a floating exchange rate is determined by the private market through supply and demand. A floating rate is often termed "self-correcting", as any differences in supply and demand will automatically be corrected in the market. Take a look at this simplified model: if demand for a currency is low, its value will decrease, thus making imported goods more expensive and thus stimulating demand for local goods and services. This in turn will generate more jobs, and hence an autocorrection would occur in the market. A floating exchange rate is constantly changing. In reality, no currency is wholly fixed or floating. In a fixed regime, market pressures can also influence changes in the exchange rate. Sometimes, when a local currency does reflect its true value against its pegged currency, a "black market" which is more reflective of actual supply and demand may develop. A central bank will often then be forced to revalue or devalue the official rate so that

10 | P a g e

the rate is in line with the unofficial one, thereby halting the activity of the black market. In a floating regime, the central bank may also intervene when it is necessary to ensure stability and to avoid inflation; however, it is less often that the central bank of a floating regime will interfere.

11 | P a g e

Fixed vs. Flexible

Fixed advantages
A fixed exchange rate should reduce uncertainties for all economic agents in the country. As businesses have the perfect knowledge that the price is fixed and therefore not going to change they can plan ahead in their productions. Inflation may have a harmful effect on the demand for exports and imports. To ensure that inflation is kept as low as possible the government is forced to take measurements, to keep businesses competitive in foreign markets. In theory a fixed exchange rate should also reduce speculations in foreign exchange markets. In reality this is not always the case as countries want to make speculative gains.

Fixed Disadvantages
The government is keeping the exchange rate fixed by manipulating the interest rates. If the exchange is in danger of falling the government needs to increase interest rates to increase demand for the currency. As this would have a deflationary effect on the economy the demand might decrease and unemployment might increase. A government has to maintain high levels of foreign reserves to keep the exchange rate fixed as well as to instill confidence on the foreign exchange markets. This makes clear that a country is able to defend its currency by the buying and selling of foreign currencies. Fixing the exchange rate is not easy as there are many variables which are changing over time if the exchange rate is set wrong it might be hard for export companies to be competitive in foreign countries. International disagreement might be created
12 | P a g e

when a country sets its exchange rate on a too low level. This would make a countries export more competitive which might lead to a disagreement between countries as they might see it as an unfair trade advantage.

Flexible Advantages
As the exchange rate does not have to be kept at a certain level anymore interest rates are free to be employed as domestic management policies(Appleyard 703). The floating exchange rate is adjusting itself to keep the current account balanced, in theory. As the reserves are not used to control the value of the currency it is not necessary to keep high levels of reserves (like gold) of foreign countries.

Flexible Disadvantages
Floating exchange rates tend to create uncertainty on the international markets. As businesses try to plan for the future it is not easy for the businesses to handle a floating exchange rate which might vary. Therefore investment is more difficult to assess and there is no doubt that excursive exchange rates will reduce the level of international investment as it is difficult to assess the exact level of return and risk. Floating exchange rates are affected by more factors than only demand and supply, such as government intervention. Therefore they might not necessarily adjust themselves in order to eliminate current account deficits. The floating exchange rate might worsen existing levels of inflation. If a country has higher inflation rate than others this will make the export of the country less competitive and its imports more expensive.

13 | P a g e

Then the exchange rate will fall which could lead to even higher import prices of goods and because of cost-push inflation which might drive the overall inflation rate even more. While flexible exchange rates can ensure that the country achieves external balance, they do not ensure internal balance. In several situations the exchange rate change that reestablishes external balance can make an internal imbalance worse. If a country has rising inflation and a tendency toward external deficit, the depreciation of the currency can intensify the inflation pressures in the country. If a country has excessive unemployment and a tendency toward surplus, the appreciation of the currency can make the unemployment problem worse. To achieve internal balance, the country's government may need to implement domestic policy changes.

14 | P a g e

Evolution of Indias Exchange Rate Regime and Capital Flows

Against this backdrop of international experience, it would be useful to begin the analysis of the Indian experience with a review of the historical developments of its exchange rate regime. Uniform currency was introduced in India in 1835, exactly 100 years before the institution of our central bank i.e., the Reserve Bank of India, wherein the silver rupee of 180 grains troy, 11/12ths fine was instituted as the sole legal tender throughout British India. The country remained on a silver standard for a period of almost sixty years until the closure of Indian mints to the free coinage of silver in 1893. During this interregnum, there was also the introduction of paper currency in 1862. From 1893 onwards, although efforts were made towards the establishment of a gold standard, none of the systems that were adopted in practice fulfilled the essential requirement of a gold standard. In 1893, the Government notified that Indian mints would be accepting gold in exchange for rupees at the rate of 7.53344 grains of fine gold, corresponding to an exchange rate of 1s 4d per rupee; but even though it was binding on the Government to accept gold and give rupee/notes in exchange, there was no obligation on them to provide gold against rupee notes. With sterling on a gold basis and maintenance of the rupee at 1s 4d for a fairly long period, the system, which emerged in due course, operated as a gold exchange standard until September 1931. However, the price of silver continued to be the dominant factor in determining the external value of the rupee even during the early part of the last century. With the departure of sterling from gold in 1931, only the link with sterling remained and the currency system came to be on a sterling exchange standard.

15 | P a g e

Indias exchange rate regime since 1931 has evolved broadly in tandem with international and domestic developments (Table 8). The period after Independence in 1947 was followed by a fixed exchange rate regime where the Indian rupee was pegged to the pound sterling on account of her historic links with Britain and this was in line with the Bretton Woods System prevailing at 20that time. A major event was the devaluation of the Indian rupee by 36.5 per cent on June 6, 1966. With the breakdown of Bretton Woods system in the early 1970s and the consequent switch towards a system of managed exchange rates, and with the declining share of the UK in Indias trade, the Indian rupee, effective September 1975, was delinked from the pound sterling in order to overcome the weaknesses of pegging to a single currency. Even after the rupee was delinked from the pound sterling, the role of the exchange rate remained muted for quite some time given the widespread rationing of foreign exchange through an elaborate system of licensing, other quantitative restrictions and exchange control. During the period of 1975 to1992, the exchange rate of rupee was officially determined by the Reserve Bank within a nominal band of +/- 5 per cent of the weighted basket of currencies of Indias major trading partners. The Reserve Bank performed a market-clearing role on a day-to-day basis which introduced high variability in the size of reserves. The periodic adjustments in the exchange rate were, however, not enough to maintain external competitiveness as competitor countries had undertaken significant adjustments in their exchange rates despite their lower inflation than in India. As Rangarajan has noted, The exchange rate regime of this period can be best characterised as an adjustable nominal peg with a band, with the nominal exchange rate being the

16 | P a g e

operating variable to achieve the intermediate target of a medium-term equilibrium path of the real effective exchange rate Indias approach towards external capital flows up to the 1990s can be divided into two distinct phases. In the first-phase, starting at the time of Independence and spanning up to the early 1980s, Indias reliance on external flows was mainl y restricted to multilateral and bilateral concessional finance. Until the 1980s, Indias development strategy was focused on self-reliance and import-substitution with general reluctance to allow foreign investment and other private commercial flows. Financing of investments was undertaken almost wholly through domestic savings supplemented by foreign flows only at the margin. In the 1980s, India embarked on a path of high growth. There was a pick-up in Indias growth rate from around 3 per cent per annum during 1950-80 to more than 5 per cent per annum. However, with domestic savings not rising proportionately and productivity remaining more or less stagnant, this off-take to higher growth meant accentuated pressure on the fiscal account which had its mirror image on the current account. During this period, international developments in cross-border flows, particularly the decline in the availability of official concessional finance in relation to the external financing needs of the country, altered the external financing pattern. With the widening of the current account deficit during the 1980s, India supplemented the traditional external sources of financing with recourse to commercial debt including short-term borrowings and deposits from the non-resident Indians (NRIs). As a result, the proportion of short-term debt in Indias total external debt increased significantly by the late 1980s.

17 | P a g e

Policy Overhaul in the 1990s a. External Sector

India entered into the 1990s with a baggage of high current account deficit (about 3.2 per cent of GDP in 1990-91) mainly emanating from fiscal excesses. This was mostly financed by debt creating flows, a substantial part of which was of a shortterm nature. This was supported by an official exchange rate regime out of alignment with the market fundamentals that gave scope for the operation of parallel markets. The whole edifice was based on a "repressed" financial system debilitated arguably by public sector monopoly and license permit raj. This weakness of the economy was brutally exposed at the beginning of the 1990s by a spate of international events. The significant rise in oil prices, suspension of remittances from the Gulf region in the wake of the Gulf crisis, disruption of trade with the break-up of erstwhile Eastern Bloc, recessionary conditions in industrialised countries etc. led to severe problems in the balance of payments in India. The Gulf crisis had several effects: it led to a rise in PoL import bill, partial loss of exports market in West Asia compounded by the drying-up of private remittances coming from that region. With the tightening of access to commercial banks and short-term credit, financing of the current account deficit became unsustainable leading to a crisis situation. Indias foreign currency assets depleted rapidly from US $ 3.1 billion in August 1990 to US $ 975 million (equivalent to less than one month of imports) on July 12, 1991. While a conscious decision was taken to honor all debt without seeking rescheduling, several steps were taken to tide over the crisis: i. a part of gold reserves was sent abroad to get some immediate liquidity;

18 | P a g e

ii. non-essential imports were restricted by a variety of price based and quantitative measures; iii. the IMF, multilateral and bilateral donors were approached; iv. macroeconomic stabilization programme was put in place; v. India Development Bonds (IDBs) were floated in October 1991 to mobilise mediumterm funds from non-resident Indians that yielded US $ 1.6 billion; and vi. credible commitments were made to bring about structural reforms.

The broad approach to reform in the external sector was laid out in the Report of the High Level Committee on Balance of Payments, 1993 (Chairman: C. Rangarajan). It recommended, inter alia, liberalisation of current account transactions leading to current account convertibility; compositional shift in capital flows away from debt to non-debt creating flows; move towards a market related exchange rate regime; strict regulation of external commercial borrowings, especially short-term debt; discouraging 24volatile elements of flows from nonresident Indians and gradual liberalisation of outflows. With a view to placing Indias exchange rate at an appropriate level in line with the inflation differential with major trading partners so as to maintain the competitiveness of exports, a two-step downward adjustment of 18-19 per cent in the exchange rate of the Indian rupee was made on July 1 and 3, 1991. This provided the necessary impetus for a move towards greater exchange rate flexibility. Consequently, the Liberalised Exchange Rate Management System (LERMS) involving dual exchange rate system was instituted in March 1992 in
19 | P a g e

conjunction with other measures of liberalisation in the areas of trade, industry and foreign investment. Under the LERMS, 40 per cent of foreign exchange earnings had to be surrendered at an official rate determined by the Reserve Bank, which in turn was obliged to sell foreign exchange only for import of essential commodities and the Governments debt servicing. The balance 60 per cent of exchange earnings were to be converted at rates determined by the market. The LERMS was essentially a transitional mechanism and a downward adjustment in the official exchange rate took place in early December 1992 and ultimate convergence of the dual exchange rates was made effective from March 1, 1993. On unification, the exchange rate of the Indian rupee became market related and its downward adjustment both against the US dollar and also against the trade-weighted basket neutralised the impact of the prevailing inflation differential. Apart from a move-over to a market determined exchange rate in 1993, a series of concurrent external and domestic policy measures were undertaken since the early 1990s aimed at enhancing the efficiency, competitiveness and productivity of the Indian economy. In managing the external account, measures were taken to ensure a sustainable level of current account deficit, limited reliance on external debt, especially short-term external debt and an adequate level of international reserves. A liberalised trade regime was put in place, characterized by a short negative list of exports and imports, lowering of the level and dispersion of nominal tariffs, withdrawal of quantitative 25restrictions on imports, reduction in non-tariff barriers to external trade and phasing out of the system of import licensing. The trade policy reforms also encompassed significant changes in the system of export incentives, moving away from direct subsidies to indirect export promotional measures.

20 | P a g e

The unification of the exchange rate of the Indian rupee was also an important step towards current account convertibility, which was achieved in August 1994 by accepting Article VIII of the Articles of Agreement of the IMF. Subsequently legal framework was put in to effect i.e., Foreign Exchange Management Act, FEMA, 1999 into effect with an objective of redefining regulation as a facilitator for orderly and stable foreign exchange market in India. Over time, both inflows and outflows under capital account have been substantially liberalised and deregulated and for most transactions which are required for business or personal convenience, the rupee is, for all practical purposes convertible. In cases, where specific permissions were required for transactions above a high monetary ceiling, they were also generally forthcoming. Regarding capital inflows, non-debt creating liabilities, especially in the form of foreign direct investment were encouraged. First, foreign direct investment norms has been periodically liberalised through extension of equity cap, relaxation of current account restrictions, expansion of eligible sectors and rationalisation of administrative procedures. Similarly, foreign direct investment by non-resident Indians (NRIs) under the Reserve Bank's automatic route has been substantially expanded to include almost all items/ activities. Second, Indian companies were allowed to access ADR/GDR markets. They could also invest abroad the funds raised through ADRs/GDRs in bank deposits/certificates of deposit (CDs), Treasury Bills and other monetary instruments pending repatriation/utilisation of such funds. Resident shareholders of Indian companies were permitted to offer their shares for conversion to ADRs/ GDRs. Third, investments by Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) were allowed both in equity and debt markets and the limits to equity investment were periodically increased. Besides, they are allowed to hedge the exchange risk of
21 | P a g e

their investment through a variety of instruments in sequence with the developments in the foreign exchange market A key aspect of the external sector management has been the control over external debt since the 1990s. As regards bilateral and multilateral external assistance, while keeping in mind the gradual drying-up of supply of such funds, the broad approach has been towards longer-term concessional flows. The approach to external commercial borrowings has been one of prudence, with self imposed ceilings on approvals and a careful monitoring of the cost of raising funds as well as their end use. External commercial borrowings were made subject to a dual route; these can be accessed without any discretionary approvals up to a li mit, beyond which specific approvals were needed. Moreover, special deposit schemes were designed for NRIs and these were regularly modulated by elongating its maturity profile, bringing interest rate at par with international rates, changing the reserve requirements 28 and pruning the number of schemes. Similarly, India adopted a cautious policy stance with regard to short-term debt flows. Short-term credits were monitored and the overall limit, at any given point of time, was confined within a prudential level. Regarding capital outflows, the approach has been to facilitate direct overseas investment through joint ventures and wholly owned subsidiaries and provision of financial support to promote exports, especially project exports from India. Resident individuals and listed Indian companies were also gradually permitted to invest in overseas companies. Similarly, limits on banks investment in overseas markets were periodically raised upwards. Indian companies were permitted to prepay existing Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds (FCCBs) subject to certain conditions. Next, companies incorporated outside India were permitted to issue Indian Depository Receipts (IDRs).
22 | P a g e

Exporters and exchange earners were also given permission to maintain foreign currency accounts and use them for permitted purposes to facilitate their overseas business promotion and growth. Moreover, residents were gradually allowed to open accounts denominated in foreign currency as also to remit freely for any current and capital account transactions up to a certain limit. With the switching over to a more flexible market related exchange rate mechanism and the gradual opening up of the external sector, sufficient care was taken to ensure that foreign exchange reserves remained adequate. The magnitude of reserves were regularly measured against a variety of indices, such as the number of months of imports, trade lags, short term debt, extent of cumulative portfolio investment, etc. In fact, the policy thrust in this regard was to ensure that reserves were at least sufficient to cover any likely variations in capital flows at a given point of time or the liquidity-at-risk.

b. Financial Sector
The Indian financial system of the pre-reform period essentially catered to the needs of planned development in a mixed-economy framework where the Government sector had a predominant role in economic activity. The sector 29was characterised, inter alia, by administered interest rates, large pre-emption of resources by the authorities and extensive micro-regulations directing the major portion of the flow of funds to and from financial intermediaries. While the true health of financial intermediaries, most of them Public Sector entities, was masked by relatively opaque accounting norms and limited disclosure, there were general
23 | P a g e

concerns about their viability. In the securities market, new equity issues were governed by a plethora of complex regulations and extensive restrictions. There was very little transparency and depth in the secondary market trading of such securities. Interest rates on Government securities, the predominant segment of fixed-income securities, were decided through administered fiat. The market for such securities was a captive one where the players were mainly financial intermediaries, who had to invest in Government securities to fulfill high statutory reserve requirements. Insurance companies both life and non-life - were all publicly owned and offered very little product choice. There was little depth in the foreign exchange market as most such transactions were governed by inflexible and low limits and also prior approval requirements. Against this backdrop, a set of reforms were instituted in the 1990s to remove the financial repression existing hitherto and to impart operational flexibility, functional autonomy, systemic stability and accountability in Indias financial sector so as to be able to withstand the pressures and challenges following the opening up of the economy to cross-border capital flows in a more flexible exchange rate environment. The overall aim was to set up a productive and profitable financial sector industry and at the same time enable price discovery for efficient allocation of resources. As pointed out by Governor Reddy (Reddy, 2002 a), the approach towards financial sector reforms in India has been based on panchasutra or five principles (i) cautious and appropriate sequencing of reform measures, (ii) introduction of norms that are mutually reinforcing, (iii) introduction of complementary reforms across sectors (most importantly, monetary, fiscal and external sector), (iv) development of financial institutions and (v) development of financial markets.

24 | P a g e

A Committee on the Financial System (Chairman M. Narasimham) was set up in 1991 for this purpose to suggest the roadmap for financial sector reforms in India. Policies were designed aimed at rationalising the organisational forms, ownership pattern and domain of operations of banks, financial institutions (FIs) and NBFCs on both the asset and liability fronts. Steps were initiated to infuse competition into the financial system by permitting new banks in the private sector, reduction in government ownership of public sector banks, permission and enhancement of equity cap of foreign investment in banks in India, and instituting more liberal entry norms for foreign banks and providing them with a level-playing field vis-a-vis their domestic counterparts. Another element of financial sector reforms in India was to put in place a set of prudential measures aimed at imparting strength to the banking system as well as ensuring safety and soundness through greater transparency, accountability and public credibility. There was a concerted move towards risk-based supervision, with greater emphasis to off-site surveillance using the best international practices. Automatic monetisation of deficits was discontinued in phases following the agreement between the Government and the Reserve Bank of India on the abolition of the ad hoctreasury bills. Besides preemption of funds by the Government through high statutory requirements of maintaining Government and other approved securities in the banks were systematically pruned and market determined pricing mechanism of Government securities was instituted. In the 1990s, capital market reform measures were initiated which, inter alia, included, market determined allocation of resources, scripless/online trading, rolling settlement, dematerialised accounts, sophisticated risk management and derivatives trading, thereby greatly improving the framework and efficiency of trading and settlement. Similarly, necessary legislative measures were undertaken for appropriate changes in law wherever necessary aimed at harmonising the elements
25 | P a g e

of economic reform and underlying legislative framework. Concurrently, a slew of measures were undertaken for the development and strengthening of necessary institutions, deepening and 31broadening of financial market and their integration, and fine-tuning of operating instruments (Box 3). At the same time, with gradual opening up of the economy and development of domestic financial markets, the operational framework of the Reserve Bank was modified considerably with clearer articulation of policy goals and greater public dissemination of information relating to its operations.

India's Exchange Rate Regime since 1993

Since the introduction of reforms in the early 1990s, India has witnessed significant increases in cross-border capital flows. The net capital inflows have more than doubled from an average of US $ 4 billion during the 1980s to an average of about US $ 9 billion during 1993-2004. The proportion of non-debt flows in total capital flows has increased from about 3.5 per cent in the 1980s to about 44 per cent during 1990s (Table 9). However, the post reform period have also experienced periodic surges and ebb of capital flows that had its repercussions on exchange rate movements A variety of management tools were used to smoothen these swings and moderate their impact on exchange rate volatility, inflationary pressures, and monetary expansion/contraction so as to ensure financial stability and real sector growth in line with the overall macroeconomic objectives. Recourse was taken to sterilisation through open market operations, changes in reserve requirements, foreign currency swaps, direct purchase and sales of foreign currencies in spot market, management of short term liquidity through
26 | P a g e

repos/LAF, signaling through interest rate changes i.e. bank rate, reporting requirements for larger forex operations and open position by banks, interest rate changes applicable to export finance, relaxation of end use specification, liberalisation of capital outflows, and moral suasion.

i. March 1993-August 1995: Initial Phase of Inertia

Reflecting the positive investor confidence, the Indian economy experienced surges in capital inflows during 1993-94, 1994-95 and the first half of 1995-96, which, coupled with robust export growth, exerted upward pressures on the exchange rate. Large capital flows were sterilised through timely interventions by the Reserve Bank. In the process, the nominal exchange rate of the Indian rupee vis-a-vis the US dollar remained virtually unchanged at around Rs.31.37 per US dollar over an extended period from March 1993 to August 1995.

ii. August 1995-February 1996: The First Taste of Turbulence

The rupee came under pressure for the first time in August 1995 and the trend continued in phases till February 1996. The pressure on the rupee in August 1995 was brought about by a sudden and sharp reversal of market sentiments and expectations. Slowing down of the capital inflows in the wake of the Mexican crisis, a widening of the current account deficit on account of resurgence of growth in the real sector and the rise of US dollar against other major currencies were the main factors contributing to this phenomenon. The exchange rate of the Indian rupee depreciated by nine per cent during the period August 1995 to October 1995
27 | P a g e

before stabilising in February 1996. In response to the upheavals, the Reserve Bank intervened in the market to signal that the fundamentals were in place and to ensure that market correction of the overvalued exchange rate was orderly and calibrated. The interventions in the foreign exchange market were supported by monetary tightening to prevent speculative attacks. These decisive and timely measures brought stability to the market lasting till mid-January 1996. In the first week of February 1996, another bout of uncertainty led the rupee to shoot up to Rs.37.95 per US dollar.

iii. March 1996- Mid September 1997: Overcoming the Pressure

Interventions by the Reserve Bank along with measures to encourage faster realisation of export proceeds and to prevent an acceleration of import payments, however, succeeded in restoring orderly conditions and the rupee traded around Rs.34-35 per US dollar over the period March-June 1996. During the second half of 1996, as well as the first quarter of 1997, the rupee remained range bound. During April-August 1997, excess supply conditions, in fact, prevailed in the market with the rupee rate at around Rs. 35.7 per US dollar and the Reserve Bank had to undertake large net purchases of foreign currency.

iv. End-September 1997- mid August 1998: The Specter of Contagion

The foreign exchange market again had to cope with a number of adverse external as well as internal developments from end September 1997 to August 1998. External developments included, inter alia, the contagion due to the Asian financial crisis, the Russian crisis, fear of Chinese remninbi devaluation as also the
28 | P a g e

movements in interest rates in the industrialised countries as well as the crosscurrency movements of the US dollar vis--vis other major international currencies. Important internal developments included the imposition of economic sanctions in the aftermath of nuclear tests during May 1998. These developments created considerable degree of uncertainty in the foreign exchange market leading to excess foreign exchange demand with the rupee rate plummeting a low of Rs. 43.42 per US dollar on August 19, 1998. The Reserve Bank responded through monetary and other measures like variations in the Bank Rate, the repo rate, cash reserve requirements, refinance to banks, surcharge on import finance and minimum interest rates on overdue export bills to curb destabilising speculative activities during these episodes of volatility while allowing an orderly correction in the value of the rupee. v. End-August 1998- April 2000: Successfully Restoring Market Sentiments

An amount of US $ 4.23 billion was raised at a moderate cost through a special issue, the Resurgent India Bonds (RIBs) in August 1998 with an aim to (a) compensate for the extraordinary events in 1998-99 which may have resulted in some shortfall in the normally expected levels of capital flows and (b) offset the adverse market sentiment created in the international capital markets due to downgrading of Indias sovereign rating to non-investment grade by some credit rating agencies. The result of all these measures was the restoration of normalcy in the foreign exchange market. The rupee strengthened to Rs. 42.55 per US dollar by end-August 1998. The foreign exchange market remained relatively calm during the second half of 1998-99 with excess supply conditions prevailing in the last quarter of the financial year. The Reserve Bank intervened in the market through spot and forward purchases and rupee traded within a narrow range of Rs. 42.4029 | P a g e

42.99 per US dollar during this phase. Barring the brief period between June October 1999, when there was sudden excess demand pressure following the border conflict during June 1999 (the rupee reaching a low of Rs. 43.6 in October 1999), the forex market in India remained more or less orderly up to April 2000.package of measures and liquidity operations that, inter alia, included (i) a reiteration to keep interest rates stable with adequate liquidity; (ii) assurance to sell foreign exchange to meet any unusual supply-demand gap; (iii) opening a purchase window for select Government securities on an auction basis; (iv) relaxation in FII investment limits up to the sectoral cap/statutory ceiling; (v) a special financial package for large value exports of select products; and, (vi) reduction in interest rates on export credit. The instability on account of border tensions in May 2002 renewed excess foreign exchange demand but only for a brief period. ix. June 2002- February 2005: The Phase of Opulence

The rupee generally exhibited appreciating trend against the US dollar since June 2002 reflecting excess supply condition. In fact, since 2001, most of the currencies worldwide, except for Chinese yuan, Mexican peso and Philippines peso have been appreciating against the US dollar. The weakness of the US dollar was widespread against all the major as well as emerging market 39 currencies. However, reflecting cross-currency movements, the Indian rupee depreciated against other key currencies such as euro, yen and pound sterling. In April 2004, rupee reached a high at Rs. 43.6 per US dollar. Since May 2004, the excess supply position in the foreign exchange market was somewhat moderated by the rising global oil prices and a rise in interest rate in the US. The rupee ended at Rs.43.64 per US dollar in February 2005.

30 | P a g e

During this phase since June 2002, the Reserve Bank has been absorbing excess supplies in the market on the back of sustained expansion of the current account surplus in the balance of payments coupled with surges in capital flows following downward interest rate movement in advanced countries. In the process, the foreign exchange reserves of the Reserve Bank, which increased over a ten-year period by about US $ 47 billion from US $ 9.8 billion at endJune 1992 to US $ 56.8 billion at end-May 2002, witnessed a rise about US $ 84.1 billion in just three years to reach US $ 140.9 billion by March 25, 2005.

31 | P a g e

GLOBAL FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGUALTION

CONTENTS: Introduction Structure of forex regulation Types of Risk in forex regulation

32 | P a g e

What is Forex? FOREX, an acronym for Foreign Exchange, is the largest financial market in the world. With an estimated $1.5 trillion in currencies traded daily, Forex provides income to millions of traders and large banks worldwide. The market is so large in volume that it would take the New York Stock Exchange, with a daily average of under $20 billion, almost three months to reach the amount traded in one day on the Foreign Exchange Market. Forex, unlike other financial markets, is not tied to an actual stock exchange. Forex is an over-the-counter (OTC) or off-exchange market. Purpose:The foreign exchange market is the mechanism by which currencies are valued relative to one another, and exchanged. An individual or institution buys one currency and sells another in a simultaneous transaction. Currency trading always occurs in pairs where one currency is sold for another and is represented in the following notation: EUR/USD or CHF/YEN. The exchange rate is determined through the interaction of market forces dealing with supply and demand. Foreign Exchange Traders generate profits, or losses, by speculating whether a currency will rise or fall in value in comparison to another currency. A trader would buy the currency which is anticipated to gain in value, or sell the currency which is anticipated to lose value against another currency. The value of a currency, in the simplest explanation, is a reflection of the condition of that country's economy with respect to other major economies. The Forex market does not rely on any one particular economy.
33 | P a g e

Whether or not an economy is flourishing or falling into a recession, a trader can earn money by either buying or selling the Currency, Reactive trading is the buying or selling of currencies in response to economic or political events, while speculative trading is based on a trader anticipating events. Background:Historically, Forex has been dominated by inter-world investment and commercial banks, money portfolio managers, money brokers, large corporations, and very few private traders. Lately this trend has changed. With the advances in internet technology, plus the industry's unique leveraging options, more and more individual traders are getting involved in the market for the purposes of speculation. While other reasons for participating in the market include facilitating commercial transactions (whether it is an international corporation converting its profits, or hedging against future price drops), speculation for profit has become the most popular motive for Forex trading for both big and small participants.

Operation The 8 Major Currencies: Whereas there are thousands of securities on the stock market, in the FOREX market most trading takes place in only a few currencies; the U.S. Dollar ($),
34 | P a g e

European Currency Unit (), Japanese Yen (), British Pound Sterling (), Swiss Franc (Sf), Canadian Dollar (Can$), and to a lesser extent, the Australian and New Zealand Dollars. These major currencies are most often traded because they Represent countries with esteemed central banks, stable governments, and relatively low inflation rates. Currencies are also always traded in pairs (i.e. USD/JPY or Dollar/Yen) at floating exchange rates. A 24 Hour Market:The foreign exchange market operates 24 hours a day, and, unlike the stock market, has no an official opening or closings. It moves in response to geopolitical events, press releases from key central banks, and reports on the economy from government statistical bureaus, among many other factors. When traders are inactive in one part of the world due to nightfall, there are traders elsewhere who are actively engaging in trades as it is daytime in their locations.

35 | P a g e

The daily session "ends" at 5PM EST, but the market does not actually close. The Forex market only closes on Friday at 4PM EST for the weekend, and re-opens at 5 PM EST on Sunday. Each day, trading begins in Sydney, Australia, and progresses to the next major financial center (Tokyo, London, New York), as the business hours in that city's time zone begin. Business Hours of Financial Centers: Trading volumes in a given region are always highest during its primary business hours, when traders at financial institutions are busy filling and placing orders. The most active times, meaning the times of most liquidity and movement in the markets, is the London open (3 AM EST), and the overlap between London/Euro close and New York's open (8-11 AM EST). The hours below correspond to someone living in the EST time zone.

New York session opens at 8:00 am and ends around 5:00 pm. Sydney session starts at 5:00 pm and ends around 2:00 am. Tokyo session begins at 7:00 pm and ends around 4:00 am. Frankfurt session opens at 2:00 am and ends around 11:00 am. London opens at 3:00 am and ends around 12:00 am.

Below is a figure showing business hours in the various regions, oriented for someone in the EST time zone. In this figure you can see the overlap between the European/London session and the New York session, between 8 am and 11 am EST. The currency markets experience the highest volatility and volume during

36 | P a g e

that overlap, which also coincides with the release of important US economic figures.

Aspects of trading Most trades on the forex market are a result of traders speculating on price movements. Although good instincts and speculator skills are invaluable to any trader, there are also other, more scientific indicators that traders use to decide whether they will buy or sell a certain currency. These are found by fundamental and technical analysis. A trader may utilize both technical and fundamental analysis before making any forex trades. The Importance of Fundamental Analysis:Fundamental factors include economic and political events (i.e. elections, wars) that occur worldwide. Monetary and fiscal policy, government reports such As GDP, CPI, PPI, and measures such as the unemployment rate also fall in this category. A trader that makes his or her market decisions in response to these releases and events is using fundamental analysis. The value of a currency in the forex market is essentially an indication of the state of one nation's economy in comparison to another nation's. A nation's political condition, along with its inflation and interest rates, impact the price of the nation's currency. Traders that use fundamental analysis can speculate on currency price movements by paying attention to the world news, economic
37 | P a g e

Reports, and indicators issued by the government. By interpreting that data, traders become more informed market participants. It is important to note that it is the outlook on an event that impacts the forex market, rather than the actual event

Itself. If the report or news matches expectations it should have already been factored into the present market price. If a report or news item is unexpected, or is Different from the anticipated results, then there will be a reaction by the currency markets to "price in" this new information. We explore fundamental analysis in greater detail in The Importance of Technical Analysis:Traders have a second tool to use in trading. Technical analysis, which has become extremely popular in the last two decades, consists of using charts, trend lines, support and resistance levels, technical indicators, and pattern identification to study the market's behavior. Traders use these technical factors to identify Buying and selling opportunities. Over long historical periods, currency behavior has produced trends and patterns that are identifiable. We explore the basics of technical analysis in Structure of forex regulation:The foreign exchange market is by far the largest and most liquid market in the world. The estimated worldwide turnover of reporting dealers, at around $1 trillion a day, is several times the level of turnover in the U.S. Government securities market, the worlds second largest market. Turnover is
38 | P a g e

equivalent to more than $200 in foreign exchange market transactions, every business day of the year, for every man, woman, and child on earth! The breadth, depth, and liquidity of the market are truly impressive. Individual trades of $200

Million to $500 million are not uncommon. Quoted prices change as often as 20 times a minute. It has been estimated that the worlds most active exchange rates can change up to 18,000 times during a single day.2 Large trades $ can be made, yet econometric studies indicate that prices tend to move in relatively small increments, a sign of a smoothly functioning and liquid market. While turnover of around $1 trillion per day is a good indication of the level of activity and liquidity in the global foreign exchange market, it is not Necessarily a useful measure of other forces in the world economy. Almost two-thirds of the total represents transactions among the reporting dealers themselves, with only one third accounted for by their transactions with financial and non-financial customers. The result is that the amount of trading with customers of a large dealer institution active in the interbank market often accounts for a very small share of that institutions total foreign exchange activity. Among the various financial centers around the world, the largest amount of foreign exchange trading takes place in the United Kingdom, even though that nations currency the pound sterlingis less widely traded in the market than several others. The United Kingdom accounts for about 32 percent of the global total; the United States ranks a distant second with about 18 percent and Japan is third with 8 percent. Thus, together, the three largest marketsone each in the European,
39 | P a g e

Western Hemisphere, and Asian time zonesaccount for about 58 percent of global trading. After these three leaders comes Singapore with 7 percent. The large volume of trading activity in the United Kingdom reflects Londons strong position as an international financial center where a large number of financial institutions are located. In the 1998 foreign exchange market turnover

Survey, 213 foreign exchange dealer institutions in the United Kingdom reported.Trading activity to the Bank of England, compared with 93 in the United States reporting to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

IT IS A TWENTY-FOUR HOUR MARKET:During the past quarter century, the concept of a twenty-four hour market has become a reality. Somewhere on the planet, financial centers are open for business, and banks and other institutions are trading the dollar and other currencies, every hour of the day and night, aside from possible minor gaps on weekends. In financial centers around the world, business hours overlap; as some centers close, others open and begin to trade. The foreign exchange market follows the sun around the earth. The International Date Line is located in the western Pacific, and each business day arrives first in the Asia-Pacific financial centers first Wellington, New Zealand, then Sydney, Australia, followed by Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Singapore. A few hours later, while markets remain active in those Asian centers, trading begins in Bahrain and elsewhere in the Middle East. Later still, when it is late in the business day in Tokyo, markets in Europe open for business. Subsequently, when it is early afternoon in Europe, trading in New York and other U.S. centers starts. Finally,
40 | P a g e

completing the circle, when it is mid- or late-afternoon in the United States, the next day has arrived in the Asia-Pacific area, the first markets there have opened, and the process begins again. The twenty-four hour market means that exchange rates and market conditions can change at any time in response to developments that can take place at any time.

It also means that traders and other market participants must be alert to the possibility That a sharp move in an exchange rate can occur during an off hour, elsewhere in the world. The large dealing institutions have adapted to these

Conditions, and have introduced various arrangements for monitoring markets and trading on a twenty-four hour basis. Some keep their New York or other trading desks open twenty-four hours a day, others pass the torch from one office to the next, and still others follow different approaches.

However, foreign exchange activity does not flow evenly. Over the course of a day, there is a cycle characterized by periods of very heavy activity and other periods of relatively light activity. Most of the trading takes place when the largest number of potential counterparties is available or accessible on a global basis. Market liquidity is of great importance to participants. Sellers want to sell when they have access to the maximum number of potential buyers, and buyers want to buy when they have access to the maximum number of potential sellers. Business is heavy when both the U.S. markets and the major European markets are openthat is, when it is morning in New York and
41 | P a g e

Afternoon in London. In the New York market, nearly two thirds of the days activity typically takes place in the morning hours. Activity normally becomes very slow in New York in the mid- to late afternoon, after European markets have closed and before the Tokyo, Hong Kong, and Singapore markets have opened.

Given this uneven flow of business around the clock, market participants often will respond less aggressively to an exchange rate development that occurs at a relatively inactive time of day, and will wait to see whether the development is confirmed pay little attention to developments in less active markets. Nonetheless, the twenty-four hour market does provide a continuous real-time market assessment of the ebb and flow of influences and attitudes with respect to the traded currencies, and an opportunity For a quick judgment of unexpected events. With many traders carrying pocket monitors, it has become relatively easy to stay in touch with market Developments at all times indeed, too easy, some harassed traders might say. The foreign exchange market provides a kind of never-ending beauty contest or horse race, where market participants can continuously adjust their bets to reflect their changing views.

THE MARKET IS MADE UP OF AN INTERNATIONAL NETWORK OF DEALERS:The market consists of a limited number of major dealer institutions that are particularly active in foreign exchange, trading with customers and (more often)
42 | P a g e

with each other. Most, but not all, are commercial banks and investment banks. These dealer institutions are geographically dispersed, located in numerous financial centers around the world. Wherever located, these institutions are linked To, and in close communication with, each other through telephones, computers, and other electronic means.

There are around 2,000 dealer institutions whose foreign exchange activities are covered by the Bank for International Settlements central bank survey, and who, essentially, make up the global foreign exchange market. A much smaller sub-set of those institutions account for the bulk of trading and market-making activity. It is estimated that there are 100- 200 market-making banks worldwide; major players are fewer than that. At a time when there is much talk about an integrated world economy and the global village, the foreign exchange market comes closest to functioning in a truly

Global fashion, linking the various foreign exchange trading centers from around the world into a single, unified, cohesive, worldwide market. Foreign exchange trading takes place among dealers and other market professionals in a large number of individual financial centers New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, Tokyo, Singapore, Frankfurt, Paris, Zurich, Milan, and many, many others. But no matter in which financial center a trade occurs, the same currencies, or rather, bank deposits denominated in the same currencies, are being bought and sold. A foreign exchange dealer buying dollars in one of those markets actually is
43 | P a g e

buying a dollar-denominated deposit in a bank located in the United States, or a claim of a bank abroad on a dollar deposit in a bank located in the United States. This holds true regardless of the location of the financial center at which the dollar deposit is purchased. Similarly, a dealer buying Deutsche marks, no matter where

The purchase is made, actually is buying a mark deposit in a bank in Germany or a claim on a mark deposit in a bank in Germany. And so on for other currencies. Each nations market has its own infrastructure. For foreign exchange market operations as well as for other matters, each country enforces its own laws, banking regulations, accounting rules, and tax code, and, as noted above, it operates its own payment and settlement systems. Thus, even in a global foreign exchange market with currencies traded on essentially the same terms simultaneously in many financial centers, there are different national financial Systems and infrastructures through which transactions are executed, and within which currencies are held. With access to all of the foreign exchange markets generally open to participants from all countries, and with vast amounts of market information transmitted simultaneously and almost instantly to dealers throughout the world, there is an enormous amount of cross border foreign exchange trading among dealers as well as between dealers and their customers. At any moment, the exchange rates of major currencies tend to be virtually identical in all of the financial centers where there is active trading. Rarely are there such substantial price differences among major centers as to provide major opportunities for arbitrage. In pricing, the various financial centers that are open for business and active at any one time are effectively integrated into a single market. Accordingly, a bank in the United States is likely to trade foreign exchange
44 | P a g e

at least as frequently with banks in London, Frankfurt, and other open foreign centers as with other banks in the United States. Surveys indicate that when major dealing institutions in the United States trade with other dealers, 58 percent of the Transactions are with dealers located outside the United States. The United States is not unique in that respect. Dealer institutions in other major countries also report That more than half of their trades are with dealers that are across borders, dealers also use brokers located both domestically and abroad.

THE MARKETS MOSTWIDELY TRADED CURRENCY IS THE DOLLAR:The dollar is by far the most widely traded currency. According to the 1998 survey, the dollar was one of the two currencies involved in an estimated 87 Percent of global foreign exchange transactions, equal to about $1.3 trillion a day. In part, the widespread use of the dollar reflects its substantial international role as: investment currency in many capital markets, reserve currency held by many central banks, transaction currency in many international commodity markets, invoice currency in many contracts, and intervention currency employed by monetary authorities in market operations to influence their own exchange rates. In addition, The widespread trading of the dollar reflects its use as a vehicle currency in foreign exchange transactions, a use that reinforces, and is reinforced by, its international role in trade and finance. Or most pairs of currencies, the market practice is to trade each of the two currencies against a common third currency as a vehicle, rather than to trade the
45 | P a g e

Two currencies directly again teach other. The vehicle currency used most often is the dollar, although by the mid-1990s the Deutsche mark also had become an important vehicle, with its use, especially in Europe, having increased sharply during the 1980s and 90s. Thus, a trader wanting to shift funds from one currency to another, say, from Swedish krona to Philippine pesos, will probably sell krona for U.S. dollars and then sell the U.S. dollars for pesos. Although this approach results in two transactions rather than one, it may be the preferred way, since the dollar/Swedish krona market, and the dollar/Philippine peso market are much more active and liquid and have much better information than a bilateral market for the two currencies directly against each other. By using the dollar or some other currency as a vehicle, banks and other foreign exchange market participants can limit more of their working balances to the vehicle currency, rather than holding and managing many currencies, and can concentrate their research and information sources on the vehicle. Use of a vehicle currency greatly reduces the number of exchange rates that must be dealt with in a multilateral system. In a system of 10 currencies, if one currency is selected as vehicle currency and used for all transactions, there would be a total of nine currency pairs or exchange rates to be dealt with (i.e., one exchange rate for

The vehicle currency against each of the others), whereas if no vehicle currency were used, there would be 45 exchange rates to be dealt with. In a system of 100 currencies with no vehicle currencies, potentially there would be 4,950 currency pairs or exchange rates [the formula is: n(n-1)/2].Thus, using a
46 | P a g e

Vehicle currency can yield the advantages of fewer, larger, and more liquid markets with fewer currency balances, reduced informational needs, and simpler operations. The U.S.dollar took on a major vehicle currency role with the introduction of the Bretton Woods par value system, in which most nations met Their IMF exchange rate obligations by buying and selling U.S. dollars to maintain a par value relationship for their own currency against the U.S. dollar.

The dollar was a convenient vehicle, not only because of its central role in the exchange rate system and its widespread use as a reserve currency, but also because of the presence of large and liquid dollar money and other financial markets, and, in time, the Euro-dollar markets where dollars needed for (or resulting from) foreign exchange transactions could conveniently be borrowed (or placed). Widely practiced. Events such as the EMS currency crisis of September 1992, when a number of European currencies came under severe market pressure against the mark, confirmed the extent to which direct use of the DEM for intervening in the exchange market could be more effective than going through the dollar. Against this background, there was very rapid growth in direct cross rate trading involving the Deutsche mark, much of it against European currencies, during the 1980s and 90s. (A cross rate is an exchange rate between two non -dollar currenciese.g., DEM/Swiss franc, DEM/pound, and DEM/yen.)There are derived cross rates calculated from the dollar rates of each of the two currencies,
47 | P a g e

And there are direct cross rates that come from direct trading between the two currencieswhich can result in narrower spreads where there is a viable market. In a number of European countries, the volume of trading of the local currency against the Deutsche mark grew to exceed local currency trading against the dollar, and the practice developed of using cross rates between the DEM and other European currencies to determine the dollar rates for those currencies.

With its increased use as a vehicle currency and its role in cross trading, the Deutsche mark was involved in 30 percent of global currency turnover in the 1998 survey. That was still far below the dollar (which was involved in 87 percent of global turnover), but well above the Japanese yen (ranked third, at 21 percent), and the pound sterling (ranked fourth, at 11 percent).

IT IS AN OVER-THE-COUNTER MARKETWITH AN EXCHANGETRADEDSEGMENT:Until the 1970s, all foreign exchange trading in the United States (and elsewhere) was handled over-the-counter, (OTC) by banks in different locations making In the United States, the OTC market was then, and is now, largely unregulated as a market. Buying and selling foreign currencies is considered the exercise of an express banking power. There are no official rules or restrictions in the United States governing the hours or conditions of trading. The trading conventions have been developed mostly by
48 | P a g e

market participants. There is no official code prescribing what constitutes good market practice. However, the Foreign Exchange Committee, an independent body sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and composed of representatives from institutions participating in the market, produces and regularly updates its report on Guidelines for Foreign Exchange Trading. These Guidelines seek to clarify common market practices and offer best practice recommendations with respect to trading activities, relationships, and other matters. The report is a purely advisory document designed to foster the healthy functioning and development of the foreign exchange market in the United

States. Although the OTC market is not regulated as a market in the way that the organized exchanges are regulated, regulatory authorities examine the foreign exchange market activities of banks and certain other institutions participating in the OTC market. As with other business activities in which these institutions are engaged, examiners look at trading systems, activities, and exposure, focusing on the safety and soundness of the institution and its activities. Examinations deal with such matters as capital adequacy, control systems, disclosure, sound banking practice, legal compliance, and other factors relating to the safety and soundness of the institution. The OTC market accounts for well over 90 percent of total U.S. foreign exchange market activity, covering both the traditional (pre-1970) products (spot, outright forwards, and FX swaps) as well as the more recently introduced (post1970) OTC products (currency options and currency swaps) On the organized exchanges, foreign exchange products traded are currency
49 | P a g e

futures and certain currency options. Trading practices on the organized Exchanges, and the regulatory arrangements covering the exchanges, are markedly different from those in the OTC market. In the exchanges, trading takes place publicly in a centralized location. Hours, trading practices, and other matters are regulated by the particular exchange; products are standardized. There are margin payments, daily marking to market, and cash settlements through a central clearinghouse. With respect to regulation, exchanges at which currency futures are traded are under the jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Corporation (CFTC); in the case of currency options, either the CFTC or the Securities and Exchange Commission

serves as regulator, depending on whether securities are traded on the exchange. Steps are being taken internationally to help improve the risk management practices of dealers in the foreign exchange market, and to encourage greater transparency and disclosure. With respect to the internationally active banks, there has been a move under the auspices of the Basle Committee on Banking Supervision of the BIS to introduce greater consistency internationally to risk-based capital adequacy requirements. Over the past decade, the regulators of a number of nations have accepted common rules proposed by the Basle Committee With respect to capital adequacy requirements for credit risk, covering exposures of internationally active banks in all activities, including foreign exchange. Further proposals of the Basle Committee for risk-based capital requirements for market risk have been adopted more recently.

50 | P a g e

Risk in forex regulation:What is Risk? Risk is defined as the chance that an investment's actual return will be different than expected. This includes the possibility of losing some or all of the original investment. Those of us who work hard for every penny we earn have a harder time parting with money. Therefore, people with less disposable income tend to be, by necessity, more risk averse. On the other end of the spectrum, day traders feel if they aren't making dozens of trades a day there is a problem. These people are risk lovers.

What Are the Major Types of Foreign Exchange Risks? With an average daily volume of over $1 trillion, the foreign exchange system is the largest market in the world. It is used by central banks, commercial financial institutions, multinational corporations, and individual speculators, each of which has their own specific types of risk. Players The largest players in the foreign exchange system are central banks like the European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, and U.S. Federal Reserve. They are followed by commercial and investment banks, global companies like Coke and McDonald's, and many different kinds of investors and traders.

Sovereign Currency Risk: The largest risk in Forex is that a country's currency will significantly depreciate or possibly even devalue. This may happen in response to
51 | P a g e

political turmoil, social unrest, war, or may be a long-term consequence of the country pursuing unsustainable budget and trade deficits.

a) Multi-National Company Risk: - Major multinational companies like Coke, Pepsi, and McDonald's derive a considerable share of their revenue from overseas markets. McDonald's, in particular, earns of 65 percent of its income outside the U.S. As a result, these companies would be very badly affected if the currency values in one or more of their major foreign markets would significantly depreciate--this would cheapen the value of their revenues, while bolstering the value of their expenses. As a result, many of these billion-dollar firms employ.

b) Complex hedging strategies designed to significantly minimize bottom-line risk in the event of adverse currency swings.

c) Investment Risk: - Investment risk is the more classic kind of risk faced by almost every foreign exchange investor, from billion-dollar macro hedge funds to individuals trading miniscule accounts. A currency investor typically buys and sells two currencies

simultaneously, hoping the one he buys appreciates in value relative to the one he sold. If this doesn't happen, he'll have a loss.

52 | P a g e

Conclusion
The study covers two main topics: first, various aspects of economic policy with respect to the exchange rate, and second, modeling and forecasting the exchange rate. Accordingly, the study analyses Indias exchange rate story and discusses the structure of the foreign exchange market in India in terms of participants, instruments and trading platform as also turnover in the Indian foreign exchange market and forward premia. The Indian foreign exchange market has evolved over time as a deep, liquid and efficient market as against a highly regulated market prior to the 1990s. The market participants have become sophisticated, the range of instruments available for trading has increased, the turnover has also increased, while the bid ask spreads have declined. This study also covers the exchange rate policy of India in the background of large capital flows. Thus, availability of information on certain key variables at regular intervals that affect the exchange rate can lead to a more informed view about the behaviour of the future exchange rates by the market participants, which may allow them to plan their foreign exchange exposure better by hedging them appropriately. Such key variables could include past data on exchange rates, forward premia, capital flows, turnover, and intervention by central banks etc. As regards availability of data on key variables relating to the Indian foreign exchange market, most of the data are available in public domain and can easily be accessed by market participants, academicians and professional researchers. Using these variables skillfully will help them to gain sound insight into future exchange rate movements.

53 | P a g e

Bibliography
Sites
http://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=12252#CON www.rbi.org www.economictimes.com www.wikipedia.org

54 | P a g e