The Laws of Commerce have remained unchanged for at least six thousand years Modern "Commercial Law" Is based

on Ancient Babylonian Codes In chapters 17 & 18 of Revelation in the Bible it is Revealed that a particular Religious Jurisdiction is recognizable as a "Great Prostitute" who "Rules over the Kings of the Earth" through the use of "Deception." "Magic," & "Merchants." This "Great Prostitute" who uses Deceptive Magic is clearly labeled therein as "BABYLON." With reference to such reputable modern textbooks as "Historical Jurisprudence" by Guy Carlton, Lee of Johns Hopkins University in 1922; Babylon's Religious Priesthood is commonly recognized as the source of the modern so-called "Laws of Commerce." These "Laws of Commerce" are shown to be a specific body of Codes, which authorize the Administration of Compelling Force in Efforts to uphold Contracts, mostly for Payments of Debts. The ancient Babylonian Priests were involved because Contracts were deemed to be a form of "Oath" entered into by the contracting parties; & the approval of the Gods were invoked so as to more effectively legitimize the entire process in the minds & the consciences of the contracting parties & all public witnesses. These Babylonian Religious Codes recognized the ability to buy & sell contracts between merchants in "Commerce." They bought & sold "slaves & the souls of men" in the time of Christ, & before & after. Under this system of Babylonian Codes, contracted-debtor-people were Forcibly Compelled to perform the contract regardless of Conscionability, or who was the contract- creditor. This Babylonian Religious Commercial Code embodied a sub- codification which is modernly recognizable as "Master-Servant Relationships," which apes," which are also the source of modern Employer-Employee Codes. This is all Babylonian Religious Code, whereunder, "Temporary Slavery" is facilitated. People were not recognized as people thereunder, but were items in Commerce. The Slave could be arrested for not showing up for work on time. Textbooks say that "The slave is not regarded or spoken of as a man, but as a, thing, and is reckoned in the same way as cattle." ... "Of ... these Rome was ... possessed from the earliest period ... " ("Historical Jurisprudence" - Lee) History seems to tell that many Israelites had been captured into Slavery in Babylon, but by the time of Christ Jesus, many had returned. The Babylonian Commercial Merchant Codes seemed to infect Israelite society at the same time & to undermine greatly the Godly Principles of the Mosaic Law. The Pharisees had schools in Babylon "from soon after 586 before the Christian era to the year 1040 after the Christian era 1626 years.". Here J.H. Hertz (Chief Rabbi - 1934) reveals the source of the material which is Codified within their "Babylonian Talmud." This is that source-repository from which the modern Talmud draws its historical roots. J.H. Hertz (Chief Rabbi) & others of the same belief are all comfortable referring to it amongst themselves as the "Babylonian Talmud." He states: "The style of the Babylonian Talmud ... is at no time "easy reading." "As the name signifies, the "Babylonian Talmud" contains much of the Commercial Slave-Trading Mercantile Codifications of "Master-Servant Relationships" which originated in Babylon. The "Babylonian Talmud" refers to those not of the Pharisaical Faith as

"Goim" or "Gois", which translates to be "Human Cattle." This is just as the textbooks refer to the Babylonians considering their Slaves. Though direct citations are thin in eluding it to Slavery itself, the "Babylonian Talmud" does set forth some such evidence showing clearly that non-Pharisees are to be treated with all of the "Contempt" of Slaves. "All things pertaining to the Goim are like desert, the first person to come along & take them can claim them for his own." Babha Bathra 45. It is permitted to deceive a goi." Babha Kama 113b. And though citations are not clear that this is directly from the Talmud, Pharisaical Literature at A. Rohl. Die Polem. P.20 states "TP.20 states "The Life of a Goi & all his physical powers belong to a Jew." And articles published by Henry Ford's newspaper, the Dearborn Independent in 1920 - 1922 discuss the "Kol Nidre" as a Pharisaical: "prayer, named from its opening words, "All vows," "(kol nidre). It is based on the declaration of the Talmud: "He who wishes that his vows & oaths shall have no value, stand up at the beginning of the year & say: 'All vows which I shall make during the year shall be of "no value.' " The list goes on & on. Coke & others have defined these People as "Infidels," precisely because History has clearly shown to the more reputable men that the "Oath" of such others means nothing to them. They cannot be "Bound" by "Conscience," & they habitually "Lie" at every turn which may serve their own self-serving interests or those of their "Synagogue of Satan" as referred to by Christ Jesus at Revelation 2:9 & 3:9. This is the nature of their "Law," among these would-be Slave Masters. They cannot be expected to be bound to tell the truth to those other people whom they feel En-Titled by the Authority of their Evil God to control such unsuspecting other men as Slaves. Such "Infidels" were expelled from almost every country in Europe between the 13th & 15th centuries for this precise reason of their tenacious adherence to this Babylonian Master-Slave system of Human Conduct Codes, & their relentless lying & deceit. The Sadducees apparently stood strong against this corrupting influence, but their days were numbered, for after the destruction of the Temple by Rome in 70 AD, the religious belief system of the Sadducees had met genocide & extinction. The Pharisees (on the other hand) were conspicuously left in the position of authority over all Jews who did not profess Christianity. The Jewish Encyclopedia: (1905 Page 665) shows that the ancient Religion of the Pharisees have been in continuous total control of what is fashionably recognized as the "Jewish Religion," ever since the destruction of Solomon's Temple. "With the destruction of their Temple ...Henceforth, Jewi/u , Jewish life was regulated by the teachings of the Pharisees ... Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism & the life & thought of the Jew for all the future." With the extinction of the Sadducees, the only Jewish entity which thereafter stood in opposition to the Pharisees & their Babylonian Codified Talmud were the Christians. The powers in Rome were compromised by this influence. As revealed elsewhere, this Religion of the Pharisees continues to this day under their self-proclaimed banner of "Judaism" or "Jews." They are not true "Jews" but rather they are of the "Synagogue of Satan," precisely as Revelation 2:9 & 3:9 state. They merely proclaim such out of strategy to effect their purpose. Approximately 85% of them are not even of the "Semitic" bloodline, but rather are of Ashkenazi background/race. They adopted the Pharisaical-Babylonian Talmudian Religion in about the year 350 or so, out of convenience. They know this but they scream "Anti-

Semite" with spine chilling fervor whenever it suits their evil agenda. Modern descendants of these same Pharisees look to the same "Babylonian Talmud" code of Master/Slave Laws as the principle source for written guidance as a Code of Conduct for their lives. Textbooks show plainly that Rome is the source of English & American Civil Law. Civil Law is recognized in Black's Law Dictionary as synonymous with "Municipal Law." Rome is well recognizable as an Aggressively Warring & Conquering nation. Textbooks say that the conquered cities "were compelled to pay the war-tax" ... "a town thus treated was known as a municipum or "burden-holder." "Many of the conquered peoples were reduced to Slaves. The Roman merchants engaged in much Slave Trade. They established Slave-markets. Contracts exchanged hands among merchants for the delivery of Slaves. The Codes which governed these contracts for Slaves was based on the same Codes which the Babylonians had developed. "Of ... these Rome was ... possessed from the earliest period ... ". ("Historical Jurisprudence" - Lee). Such Babylonian Master/Salve so-called "Law" is modernly still recognizable under either term of "Civil" or "Municipal" Law. The majority of reputable Biblical Scholars recognize Rome to be the 6th head of the 7 headed "Beast" described in Revelation upon which the "Great Prostitute" sat & which was in existence at that time of Christ, the Civil/Military government of Rome. The 7th head is similarly recognized as then prophesying of our modern Anglo-American Civil/Military government. Norman Conquest The Norman (French) Conquest over the Anglo-Saxon/Celtic people of England in 1066 is vastly under-rated in its significance to understanding modern considerations of good government. From Rome, it had the "Solemn Blessings of the Pope." The Pharisaical system of "Babylonian Talmudian" based "Commercial Law" was at that time Forcibly Imposed over the Christian-Common Law English People. An article in "The Georgetown Law Journal" V. 71, P 1179 - 1200) "The Shetar's Effect on English Law" by: Judith A. Shapiro sheds much light: "The Jews, whom the Normans brought to England ...brought a refined system of commercial law: their own form of commerce & a system of rules to facilitate and govern it. ... Several elements of historical Jewish legal practice have been integrated into the English legal system. Notable among these is the written credit agreement - shetar, or Starr, as it appears in English documents. The basis of the shetar, or "Jewish Gage," was a lien on all property (including realty) that has been traced as a source of the modern mortgage. Under Jewish law, the shetar permitted a creditor to proceed against all the goods and land of the defaulting debtor. ... Jewish law that debts could be recovered against a loan secured by "all property, movable and immovable" was a weapon of socio-economic change that tore the fabric of feudal society and established the power of liquid wealth in place of land holding. ... Jewish Law, wherein personal debt superseded rights in real property had become the law of the land." "Footnote 11: H.C. Richardson, The English Jewry Under Angevin Kings 94 (1960) (Jews liquidation of land obligations broke down rigidity of feudal land tenure and facilitated transfer of land to new capitalist class.). Footnote 15: CF. 1 F. Pollock & F.W. Maitland, supra note 3 at 469... (alien to English law 'for creditor not in possession of land' to have rights in it)."

The Pharisees worked with the Normans under the "Blessing of the Pope" of Rome & its Roman Civil Municipal Codes, all so as to establish this "weapon of socio-economic change that tore the fabric" of the society of the Anglo- Saxon/Celtic peoples. These are words of Ms Shapiro as they appear in the Georgetown Law Journal. The aggressively warring nature of that Babylonian - Talmudian based Code of Pharisaical Conduct is not in question among that circle of scholars. It is a body of Slave/Master Codes. It "tears at the fabric" of that society which it targets. The "Shetar" is a corruption of the word "Star" & refers to the famous "Star Chamber Courts." "The name star chamber ... has been thought to be ... because the roof was originally studded with stars, because the Jewish covenants (called starrs or stars ... ) were originally kept there." Bovier's 1860. "Starr or starra. The old term for contract or obligation among the Jews, being a corruption from the Hebrew word "shetar," a covenant, ... & Blackstone conjectures that the room in which the chests were kept was thence called the "StarChamber." "Star Chamber: A court which originally had jurisdiction in cases where the ordinary course of justice was so much obstructed by one party, ... that no inferior court would find its process obeyed. ... In the reign of Henry the 8th, & his successors, the jurisdiction of the court was illegally extended to such a degree (especially in punishing the kings arbitrary proclamations) that it became odious to the nation, & was abolished." Blacks 5th: These courts of Pharisaical Commercial Master/Slave Codes became heinous in part for their "Secret Proceedings" & their infliction of "Cruel & Unusual Punishments" that they were abolished. They were the essence of the so-called Equity Jurisdiction. It was all run by Chancery Priests, & referred to in deceptively as "Courts of Equity," the only thing being "Equal" about them is that all Conquered "Slaves" thereunder are treated more or less Equally. "Courts of Chancery" is a more honest name, as it was great "Chance" taken to go before such. "The whole of equity jurisprudence prevailing in England & the United States is mainly based on the civil law," so says Boviers Law Dictionary of 1868. "Civil Law" is from Rome. There was no "Equity Jurisprudence" in England prior to the Norman Conquest. The Norman Conquest had the "solemn approval of the Pope" of Rome according to the Encyclopedia Britannica. Other sources conform the Roman Popes support & blessing. The conclusion to Reasonable Men is that the Norman's "War of Aggression" was jointly backed by the Christ Killing Pharisees & the Pope of Rome, so as to Forcibly Impose the Roman Civil/Municipal Codes of Babylonian- -Talmudian based Master/Slave relations. These were mere Tools for Slave Control which was early imposed by Evil Men with great influence within the Pharisaical & Catholic religious communities. Any Truly Godly Spirituality which may have existed within either of those religious organizations was most assuredly bound & gagged by the more powerful forces of Evil therein at the times of the Norman Conquest. As at the Crusades. As at the Inquisition. These entities have very bad track records. Evil men Aggressively made Religious War against the Christian/CommonLaw - Anglo-Saxon/Celtic Peoples of England in 1066. The "BabylonianTalmud" was completed well before the Norman Conquest of 1066. It's all

the same basic Master/Slave Commerce form of Code of Human Conduct. It all treats living breathing People as "Merchandise" in Commerce to be bought & sold as those "Slaves & the Souls of Men" as referred to in Revelation 18:13. This entire body of Codified Human Conduct is all so amorally lacking in fidelity to the Supreme Laws of "Love of Neighbor" from YHVH as taught by His Son Yeshuah as to be clearly a policy of the "Synagogue of Satan" as referred to at Revelation 2:9 & 3:9. It is easy to summarize that this is that precise same Code of Human Conduct of which the Pharisee "Money-Changers" were using to corrupt the Temple in Jerusalem, & of which Christ Jesus overturned their tables & drove them out of His Father's House with the whip. It is easy to summarize that this is the Code of Conduct upon which the Pharisees moved to whip up the mob into such a fervent state of Anarchys to abort "Due Process of Law" & to have Yeshuah the Christ Lawlessly nailed to the Cross (or stake). This Code of Conduct embodied within the "Babylonian Talmud" is very large, but it contains specific portions which are designed to "Tear at the Fabric" of the society which is its target. These are the words of Ms Shapiro, as set forth in the Georgetown Law Journal. This is not the wording of "Anti-Semitic Right Wing Extremists". Ms Shapiro's term "Tear" is specifically used to denote that process which obliterated the "Fabric of ... Society," as it had existed prior to that War of Aggression. It would seem Reasonable to conclude that this is a Code of Human Conduct based on "Terrorism." Certainly the word "Tear" seems related to "Terrorism." Certainly the Anglo-Saxon/Celtic Christian People were greatly Fear Inspired by the forcible imposition of this "Babylonian Talmud" based Code of Human Conduct. The wording of Ms Shapiro Reasonably seems to be an acknowledgment that "Terrorism" was used by the Normans & the Pharisees "who call themselves Jews" as a matter of policy under that Code of Human Conduct known as the "Babylonian Talmud". This entire body of Roman Civil Law is based upon "Contracts," & it was early incorporated into what was known as English "Law Merchant," which many fine scholars have confused as being a true part of the English "Common-Law." Such happened only after corrupting influence of the Norman Conquest. Contracts are only enforceable in Courts of so-called "Equity." "Equity" jurisdiction was allowed to enter into American Jurisprudence by way of Article 3 Section 2-1 of the U.S. Constitution. Such was a slap in the face of Christ Jesus, & much Evil has worked its purpose in this land by way of that compromise of Godly Principles. However, Equity is purged from all of its authority to adjudicate anything if proper "Due Process of Law" is invoked, as such process is set forth in Beacon Theaters v Westover. This modern essence of "Law" allows Americans to free themselves by "Due Process of Law" from the Babylonian Master/Slave jurisdiction of so-called "Equity."

DUE PROCESS RIGHTS defined: All rights which are of such fundamental importance as to require compliance with due process standards of fairness and justice. Procedural and substantive rights of citizens against government actions that threaten the denial of life, liberty,

or property. See Due process of law. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 501) DUE COURSE OF LAW defined: This phrase is synonymous with "due process of law," or "the law of the land," and the general definition thereof is "law in its regular course of administration through courts of justice". See Due process of law. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 500) DUE PROCESS CLAUSE defined: Two such clauses are found in the U.S. Constitution, one in the 5th Amendment pertaining to the federal government, the other in the 14th Amendment which protects persons from state actions. There are two aspects: procedural, in which a person is guaranteed fair procedures and substantive which protects a person's property from unfair governmental interference or taking. Similar clauses are in most state constitutions. See Due process of law. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 500) DUE PROCESS OF LAW defined: Law in its regular course of administration through courts of justice. Due process of law in each particular case means such an exercise of the powers of the government as the settled maxims of law permit and sanction, and under such safeguards for the protection of individual rights as those maxims prescribe for the class of cases to which the one in question belongs. A course of legal proceedings according to those rules and principles which have been established in our systems of jurisprudence for the enforcement and protection of private rights. To give such proceedings any validity, there must be a tribunal competent by its constitution-that is, by the law of its creation-to pass upon the subject-matter of the suit; and, if that involves merely a determination of the personal liability of the defendant, he must be brought within its jurisdiction by service of process within the state, or his voluntary appearance. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 733, 24 L.Ed. 565. Due process of law implies the right of the person affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgment upon the question of life, liberty, or property, in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him, this is not due process of law. An orderly proceeding wherein a person is served with notice, actual or constructive, and has an opportunity to be heard and to enforce and protect his rights before a court having power to hear and determine the case. Kazubowski v. Kazubowski, 45 IlL2d 405, 259 N.E.2d 282, 290. Phrase means that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, property or of any right granted him by statute, unless matter involved first shall have been adjudicated against him upon trial conducted according to established rules regulating judicial proceedings, and it forbids condemnation without a hearing. Pettit v. Penn, La.App., 180 So.2d 66, 69. The concept of "due process of law" as it is embodied in Fifth Amendment demands that a law shall not be unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious and that the means selected shall have a reasonable and substantial relation to the object being sought. U. S. v. Smith, D.C.lowa, 249 F.Supp. 515, 516. Fundamental requisite of "due process" is the opportunity to be heard, to be aware that a matter is pending, to make an informed choice whether to acquiesce or contest,

and to assert before the appropriate decision-making body the reasons for such choice. Trinity Episcopal Corp. v. Romney, D.C.N.Y., 387 F.Supp. 1044, 1084. Aside from all else, "due process" means fundamental fairness and substantial justice. Vaughn v. State, 3 Tenn.Crim.App. 54, 456 S.W.2d 879, 883. Embodied in the due process concept are the basic rights of a defendant in criminal proceedings and the requisites for a fair trial. These rights and requirements have been expanded by Supreme Court decisions and include, timely notice of a hearing or trial which informs the accused of the charges against him or her; the opportunity to confront accusers and to present evidence on one's own behalf before an impartial jury or judge; the presumption of innocence under which guilt must be proven by legally obtained evidence and the verdict must be supported by the evidence presented; the right of an accused to be warned of constitutional rights at the earliest stage of the criminal process; protection against self-incrimination; assistance of counsel at every critical stage of the criminal process; and the guarantee that an individual will not be tried more than once for the same offense (double jeopardy). See also Procedural due process; Substantive due process. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 500, 501) PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS defined: The guarantee of procedural fairness which flows from both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments due process clauses of the Constitution. For the guarantees of procedural due process to apply, it must first be shown that a deprivation of a significant life, liberty, or property interest has occurred. This is necessary to bring the Due Process Clause into play. Minimal procedural due process is that parties whose rights are to be affected are entitled to be heard and, in order that they may enjoy that right, they must be notified. Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 79, 92 S.Ct. 1983, 1994, 32 L.Ed.2d 556. Procedures which due process requires beyond that minimum must be determined by a balancing analysis based on the specific factual context. Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1203) COMMERCIAL LAW defined: A phrase used to designate the whole body of substantive jurisprudence (e.g. Uniform Commercial Code; Truth in Lending Act) applicable to the rights, intercourse, and relations of. persons engaged in commerce, trade, or mercantile pursuits. See Uniform Commercial Code. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 270) COMMERCE defined: The exchange of goods, productions, or property of any kind; the buying, selling, and exchanging of articles. Anderson v. Humble Oil and Refining Co., 226 Ga. 252, 174 S.E.2d 415, 417. The transportation of persons and property by land, water and air. Union Pacific R. Co. v. State Tax Commissioner, 19 Utah 2d 236, 429 P.2d 983, 984. Intercourse by way of trade and traffic between different peoples or states and the citizens or inhabitants thereof, including not only the purchase, sale, and ex change of commodities, but also the instrumentalities and agencies by which it is promoted and the means and appliances by which it is carried on, and transportation of persons as well as of goods, both by land and sea. Brennan v. Titusville, 153 U.S. 289, 14 S.Ct. 829, 38 L.Ed. 719; Railroad Co. v. Fuller, 84 U.S. (17 Wall.) 568, 21 L.Ed. 710; Hoke v. United States, 227 U.S. 308, 33

S.Ct. 281, 57 L.Ed. 523. Also interchange of ideas, sentiments, etc., as between man and man. The term "commerce" means trade, traffic, commerce, transportation, or communication among the several States, or between the District of Columbia or any Territory of the United States and any State or other Territory, or between any foreign country and any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, or within the District of Columbia or any Territory, or between points in the same State but through any other State or any Territory or the District of Columbia or any foreign country. National Labor Relations Act, 2. For purposes of Fair Labor Standards Act, "commerce" means trade, commerce, transportation, trans mission, or communication among several states or between any state and any place outside thereof. Wirtz v. B. B. Saxon Co., C.A.Fla., 365 F.2d 457, 460. See also Affecting commerce; Chamber of Commerce; Interstate and foreign commerce; Interstate commerce; Interstate Commerce Act; Interstate Commerce Commission; Intrastate commerce. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 269) COMMERCIAL defined: Relates to or is connected with trade and traffic or commerce in general; is occupied with business and commerce. Anderson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 226 Ga. 252, 174 S.E.2d 415, 416. Generic term for most all aspects of buying and selling. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 270) COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY defined: Term includes any type of business or activity, which is carried on for a profit. Lanski v. Montealegre, 361 Mich. 44, 104 N.W.2d 772, 774. Activity relating to or connected with trade and traffic or commerce in general. Steinbeck v. Gerosa, 4 N.Y.2d 302, 175 N.Y.S.2d 1, 6, 151 N.E.2d 170, 173. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 270) Under The Laws of Commerce: Truth is Sovereign The foundation of the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) is Commercial Law. The foundation of Commercial Law is based upon certain universal, eternally just, valid, moral precepts and truths. The basis of Commercial Law is the Law of Exodus (i.e. The 10 Commandments) of the Old Testament and Judaic (Mosaic) Orthodox Hebrew Commercial law. The Laws of Commerce have remained unchanged for at least six thousand years and form the basis of western civilization, if not all nations. This law of commerce therefore applies universally throughout the world. Real Commercial Law is non-judicial and is prior and superior to, the basis of, and cannot be set aside or overruled by the statutes of any government, legislature, governmental or quasi-governmental agencies, courts, judges, and law enforcement agencies, which are under an inherent obligation to uphold said Commercial Law. Commercial Law is a War of Truth expressed in the form of an intellectual weapon called an Affidavit. An Affidavit is merely a written list of facts or truths signed under penalty of perjury and usually notarized. The person composing and signing an affidavit is called the affiant. It is survival of the fittest where the last unrebutted stands triumphant. The essential elements of the Commercial Law are good, being based upon: Good faith action.

Clean hands doctrine. Fair business practices. Full disclosure. Duty of care. Just compensation. Equal protection of the law.

Mercy. Grace. The eternal, unchanged principles of Commercial Law are: a) A workman is worthy of his hire. (thou shalt not steal) b) All are equal under the law. (no one is above the law) c) In Commerce, truth is sovereign. (thou shalt not bear false witness) d) Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit. e) An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in Commerce. f) An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce. g) All matters must be expressed to be resolved. h) He who leaves the battlefield first loses by default. i) Sacrifice is the measure of credibility (no willingness to sacrifice = no liability, responsibility, authority or measure of conviction) j) A lien or claim can be satisfied only through an affidavit with point-for-point rebuttal, resolution by (common law) jury or payment. The Legislative History of the Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966, P.L. 89719, explains that the entire taxing and monetary systems were placed under the Uniform Commercial Code. The U.C.C. is the code that regulates all negotiable instruments. It was previously called the Law Merchant and the Negotiable Instrument Law. The U.C.C. has been grossly abused by the IRS. It is essential that we over-stand how the U.C.C. operates in order to have the upper hand in our dealings with the corporations.

See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/206408443/Modern-Commercial-Law-isBased-on-Ancient-Babylonian-Codes