Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stability of Well Foundation and steining stresses have been checked for the following four cases:-
45.1 x 2 + 32.1
Design Levels
Seismic Coefficient :
Zone-III
3.500 m 0.300
Deck Level 81.190 m
80.890 m Level
1.350 m
HFL 75.580 m
0.950 76.492
6.500 m
Water Fill
cL of well cL of brg.
1.200 m
Sand Fill
1.000 m
3.250 m 3.250 m
10.250
m
(vii) Well
Outer Dia. = 6.500 m Steining Thickness = 1.000 m Inner Dia. = 4.500 m
Above HFL
Below HFL
C.G. of back Fill From Abutment Face = 3.500 / 2.000 = 3.500 = 1.750 m
2.000
from the face of abutment on left side
Rectangular portion = 10.250 x 1.000 x 2.000 = 20.500 m^3
C.G. of Front Fill From Abutment Face = 4R = 4.000 x 2.000 = 8.000 = 0.849 m
3.000 x 3.142 9.425
from the face of abutment on right side
(vi) Volume of Intermediate Plug
Above HFL
Below HFL
3.175 3.175
A 1.000 B
Total Hori. Distance between free end (Cantilever Return) from Abutment Shaft edge(River Side) = 1.000 + 3.500 = 4.500 m
Height from Deck Level to the RL of starting of front pitching slope = 4.500 = 3.000 m
1.500
RL of point from which front slope pitching starts = 81.125 -0.300 -3.000 = 77.825 m
RL of point for front pitching above the well cap edge (River side) = 77.825 -2.000 = 76.492 m
1.500
RL of point for frontpitching above the well cap edge (River side) 1.888 m from face = 77.825 -1.888 = 76.567 m
1.500
C.G. of Front Fill From Abutment Face = 4R = 4.000 x 2.000 = 8.000 = 0.849 m
3.000 x 3.142 9.425
from the face of abutment
Seismic coefficient analysis
Horizontal Seismic Force
= Z Sa
2 g
R
I
1/2
= 2.0 D
1000F
DL SIDL FPLL
D = 7633.4 + 1864.2 + 123.2
LL
= 9620.8 + 1000 = 10620.8 KN
Shear Rating No of bearings
F = 3.8218 x 6 = 22.9308 KN
= 1.361 sec
= 1.36 = 0.999
1.361
Ah = 0.16 x 0.999
2
2.5
1.5
Ah = 0.048
Copy of Abutment_well
RA + RB = 554.000 kN
RB = 115.883 kN
RA = 438.117 kN
Without impact
70 R wheeled
Max CWLL Reaction at Abutment
0.600 1.025
RA 43.425 m RB
RA + RB = 1000.00 kN
-170.000 x 0.600
RB = 104.175 kN
RA = 895.825 kN
Without impact
Class A 2 Lane
Min CWLL Reaction at Abutment
RA + RB = 554.000 kN
RB = 451.095 kN
RA = 102.905 kN
Without impact
70 R wheeled
Min CWLL Reaction at Abutment
0.600 43.425 m RB
1.025
RA + RB = 1000.00 kN
= 36173.80
RB = 833.018 kN
RA = 166.982 kN
Without impact
Braking force is considered 20 % of live load coming on the span for two lane as per cl. 214.2 of IRC :6.
For third lane , 5% braking force will be considered.
Movement of superstructure Due to Shrinkage = Strain due to Residual Shrinkage at 28 days x Span/2
= 0.00019 x 21712.500 ( Refer IRC: 18)
= 4.13 mm
Net expansion due to temp.,shrinkage & creep = -12.70 + 8.79 + 4.1 = 0.2 mm
Net contraction due to temp.,shrinkage & creep = 12.70 + 8.787 + 4.1 = 25.6 mm
No. of bearings
Force due to temp., shrinkage & creep in expansion case = 3 x 3821.8 x 0.2 = 2.4 kN
1000
No. of bearings
Force due to temp.,shrinkage & creep in contraction case = 3 x 3821.8 x 25.6 = 293.7 kN
1000
Seismic case
Longitudnal Horizontal Force (HL) =
Net expansion due to temp., shrinkage and creep = 12.70 + 8.79 + 4.1 = 25.6 mm
Net contraction due to temp, shrinkage and creep = -12.70 + 8.79 + 4.1 = 0.2 mm
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 75.990 m and @ cg of Abutment Shaft
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 52.000 m and @ cg of Foundation Level
17 Well Cap (Left rectangular portion) 71.750 14.000 1004.500 0.000 0.000
18 Rectangular portion 20.500 14.000 287.000 0.000 0.000
19 Well Cap (Right elliptical portion) 32.201 14.000 450.819 0.000 0.000
20 Intermediate Plug 7.952 12.000 95.426 0.000 0.000
21 Well Steining 350.586 14.000 4908.204 0.000 0.000
22 Bottom Plug 42.217 12.000 506.602 0.000 0.000
23 Well Kerb 21.599 14.000 302.390 0.000 0.000
24 Sump in Bottom Plug 16.358 12.000 196.298 0.000 0.000
25 Sand Fill 206.963 10.000 2069.628 0.000 0.000
26 Earth on Well Kerb 20.624 10.000 206.245 0.000 0.000
Total Loads and Moment at Well Foundation 20371.65 2940.50
Total Loads upto Well Cap Top Level SHIFT TILT Total Loads below Well Cap Top Level TILT
Mts .= 10344.539 x ( 0.150 + 23.990 ) + 10027.113 x 23.990 = 6157.190 kNm
80.000 160.000
MR Mts
Total Resultant Moment = 135315.253 + 6157.190 = 141472.443 kNm
Copy of Abutment_well
= 586.534 + 0.000
= 586.534 - 0.000
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 75.990@ cg of Abutment Shaft
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 52.000 g of Well Foundation Level
16.000 Front Fill on Well cap 18.811 10.000 188.109 2.099 394.809
17.000 Well Cap (Left elliptical portion) 71.750 14.000 1004.500 0.000 0.000
18.000 Rectangular portion 20.500 14.000 287.000 0.000 0.000
19.000 Well Cap (Right elliptical portion) 32.201 14.000 450.819 0.000 0.000
20.000 Intermediate Plug 7.952 12.000 95.426 0.000 0.000
21.000 Well Steining 350.586 14.000 4908.204 0.000 0.000
22.000 Bottom Plug 42.217 12.000 506.602 0.000 0.000
23.000 Well Kerb 21.599 14.000 302.390 0.000 0.000
24.000 Sump in Bottom Plug 16.358 12.000 196.298 0.000 0.000
25.000 Sand Fill 206.963 10.000 2069.628 0.000 0.000
26.000 Earth on Well Kerb 20.624 10.000 206.245 0.000 0.000
MR Mts
Total Resultant Moment = 121385.162 + 5833.444 = 127218.606 kNm
= 565.814 + 0.000
= 565.814 - 0.000
5 Thickening of slab 0.675 24.000 16.200 0.777 0.388 78.569 0.450 2.004 0.175 2.004 0.175 20.643 12.875
6 Dirt wall 9.156 24.000 219.739 10.539 5.269 79.701 -0.350 39.112 -1.844 39.112 -1.844 291.937 186.579
7 Abutment Cap(Uniform portion) 7.611 24.000 182.655 8.760 4.380 77.763 0.175 15.527 0.767 15.527 0.767 225.684 138.107
8 Uniform portion of corbel 3.588 24.000 86.100 4.129 2.065 77.913 0.000 7.939 0.000 7.939 0.000 107.002 65.720
9 Triangluar portion of corbel 0.628 24.000 15.068 0.723 0.361 77.496 0.617 1.088 0.223 1.088 0.223 18.424 11.200
10 Abutment Shaft (Above HFL) 17.758 24.000 426.195 20.440 10.220 76.446 0.000 9.326 0.000 9.326 0.000 499.691 295.345
11 Abutment Shaft (Below HFL) -4.202 24.000 -100.860 -4.837 -2.419 75.785 0.000 0.992 0.000 0.992 0.000 -115.054 -66.695
12 Return Wall (Uniform Portion) 0.630 24.000 15.120 0.725 0.363 81.040 -2.250 3.662 -0.816 3.662 -0.816 21.059 13.809
13 Return Wall (Tapered Portion) 2.450 24.000 58.800 2.820 1.410 80.112 -1.667 11.625 -2.350 11.625 -2.350 79.278 51.086
14 Railing over cantilever Return 2.000 3.800 3.000 22.800 1.093 0.547 81.615 -2.100 6.151 -1.148 6.151 -1.148 32.384 21.452
Nos.
15 Total Load and moments at Abutment Shaft Bottom 6211.531 45.170 148.953 97.425 51.872 97.43 51.87 1181.0 729.5
16 Well Cap (RSL) 0.000 24.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 71.502 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
Total Load and moments at Well Foundation Level 6211.531 45.170 148.953 97.43 51.87 1181.0 729.5
Case 3 (a)
Calculation for Loads and Moments at Abutment Shaft Bottom
Case 3 (b)
Calculation for Loads and Moments at Foundation Level
1.000 Total Loads and Moment at Well Foundation in Normal Case 20371.65 2940.50
2.000 Earth on Well Kerb in Normal case -20.624 10.000 -206.24 0.00 0.00
3.000 Earth on Well Kerb in Seismic case 21.952 10.000 219.52 0.00 0.00
Total Loads and Moment at Well Foundation in Seismic Case 20384.92 2940.50
Copy of Abutment_well
Total Loads upto Well Cap Top Increment in Load Total Loads below Well Increment in Load
Level in normal case Due to Seismic SHIFT TILT Cap top level in Normal Case Due to Seismic TILT
= 591.205 + 0.000
= 591.205 - 0.000
5.000 Thickening of slab 0.675 24.000 16.200 0.777 0.388 78.569 0.450 2.004 0.175 8.313 0.175 20.643 15.328
6.000 Dirt wall 9.156 24.000 219.739 10.539 5.269 79.701 -0.350 39.112 -1.844 124.690 -1.844 291.937 219.846
7.000 Abutment Cap(Uniform portion) 7.611 24.000 182.655 8.760 4.380 77.763 0.175 15.527 0.767 86.663 0.767 225.684 165.760
8.000 Uniform portion of corbel 3.588 24.000 86.100 4.129 2.065 77.913 0.000 7.939 0.000 41.470 0.000 107.002 78.755
9.000 Triangluar portion of corbel 0.628 24.000 15.068 0.723 0.361 77.496 0.617 1.088 0.223 6.956 0.223 18.424 13.481
10.000 Abutment Shaft (Above HFL) 17.758 24.000 426.195 20.440 10.220 76.446 0.000 9.326 0.000 175.308 0.000 499.691 359.868
11.000 Abutment Shaft (Below HFL) -4.202 14.000 -58.835 -2.822 -1.411 75.785 0.000 0.578 0.000 -22.335 0.000 -67.115 -47.813
12.000 Return Wall (Uniform Portion) 0.630 24.000 15.120 0.725 0.363 81.040 -2.250 3.662 -0.816 9.551 -0.816 21.059 16.098
13.000 Return Wall (Tapered Portion) 2.450 24.000 58.800 2.820 1.410 80.112 -1.667 11.625 -2.350 34.525 -2.350 79.278 59.988
14.000 Railing over cantilever Return 2.000 3.800 3.000 22.800 1.093 0.547 81.615 -2.100 6.151 -1.148 15.030 -1.148 32.384 24.904
Total Load and moments at Abutment Shaft Bottom 5879.858 47.185 141.000 97.012 47.839 480.17 47.84 1229.0 906.2
15.000 Well Cap 0.000 24.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 71.502 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
Total Load and moments at Well Foundation Level 5879.858 47.185 141.000 480.17 47.84 1229.0 906.2
Copy of Abutment_well
Case 4 (a)
Calculation for Loads and Moments at Abutment Shaft Bottom
Case 4 (b)
Calculation for Loads and Moments at Foundation Level
1.000 Total Loads and Moment at Well Foundation in Normal Case 19652.02 1605.1
2.000 Earth on Well Kerb in Normal case -20.624 10.000 -206.24 0.00 0.0
3.000 Earth on Well Kerb in Seismic case 21.952 10.000 219.52 0.00 0.0
Total Loads upto Well Cap Top Increment in Load Total Loads below Well Increment in Load
Level in normal case Due to Seismic SHIFT TILT Cap top level Due to Seismic TILT
= 5896.876 kNm
MR Mts
Total Resultant Moment = 133091.742 + 5896.876 = 138988.618 kNm
= 570.256 + 429.660
= 570.256 - 429.660
Case 1
Live Load Surcharge
Layer Ka = 0.2794 Moment @ Moment @
Reduced Level thickness Pressure Length Force c.g. of force 52.0 76.0
(m) (kN / m^2) (kN. m) (kN. m)
Case 1
Active Earth Pressure(Normal Case) (LWL Case) In case of LWL , it is assumed that MSL is at Well cap level
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N -2c / N yz / N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
29.2
Copy of Abutment_well
Reduced Level Layer -2c / N yz / N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @ Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 52.0 52.0 76.0 76.0
(FOS=2) (m) (m) c c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
29.2
Total 0.0 7624.6 0.0 101041.8 0.0 1208.0
18.0
Copy of Abutment_well
Reduced Level Layer 2c * N yz * N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 52.0 52.0
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
18.0
Total 0.0 31181.6 0.0 198992.2
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N y z * N
(m) (kN /m^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) 74.0 m
LWL 70.0
-4.0 0.0 25.0 2.46 10.0 6.2 5.736
Well cap bottom 74.0 6.2 73.0 m
1.0 0.0 25.0 2.46 10.0 6.2 5.7
End Layer 1 73.0
6.0 0.0 25.0 2.46 10.0 6.2 5.7
MSL 67.0 6.2 67.0 m
2.0 0.0 25.0 2.46 10.0 6.2 5.7
End of Layer 2 65.0
2.0 0.0 25.0 2.46 10.0 6.2 5.7 6.2 65.0 m
End of Layer 3 63.0
9.3 0.0 25.0 2.46 10.0 6.2 5.7
Well kerb top 53.7
1.7 0.0 25.0 2.46 10.0 6.2 5.7 6.2 63.0
Foundation Level 52.0
6.2 52.0 m
Reduced Level Layer yz * N Projected (FOS) Force c.g. of force Moment @
thickness Length of we (kN) 52.0
(m) c
(kN.m)
Passive relief due to (-ve) surcharge
LWL 70.0
-4.0 6.2 10.3 2.0 -126.4 72.0 -2527.0
Well cap bottom 74.0
1.0 6.2 6.5 2.0 20.1 73.5 431.6
End Layer 1 73.0
6.0 6.2 6.5 2.0 120.1 70.0 2161.2
MSL 67.0
2.0 6.2 6.5 2.0 40.2 66.0 562.9
End of Layer 2 65.0
2.0 6.2 6.5 2.0 40.2 64.0 482.6
End of Layer 3 63.0
9.3 6.2 6.5 2.0 187.1 58.4 1189.1
Well kerb top 53.7
1.7 6.2 6.7 2.0 34.9 52.9 29.7
Foundation Level 52.0
18.0
Total 316.1 2330.1
Case 1
It is assumed that point of zero shear will be at a distance of Z m below from well cap bottom.
Active force upto Well cap bottom by surcharge Active force below Well cap bottom for Z depth by surcharge
445.4 + 39.2 Z +
Active Force due to Active Force due Active Force due
upto Well cap bottom to phai soil below Well cto phai soil below Well cap bottom
0.0 + 0.0 Z +
2.0
(FOS) -c
Passive Force due Passive Force due Passive Force due
upto Well cap bottom to phai soil below Well cto phai soil below Well cap bottom
upto depth Z upto depth Z
2340.0 + -1487.6 Z + 186.4 Z^2 +
2.0 2.0
Passive Force due to -ve Surcharge Passive Force due to -ve Surcharge
upto Well cap bottom by phai of soil below Well cap bottom by phai of soil
upto depth Z
-126.4 + 40.2 Z
2.0
This means, Point of zero shear will be at a distance of 11.1 m in layer 2 i.e. at RL 62.9 m
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c / N yz / N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
18.3
Reduced Level Layer -2c / N yz / N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 62.9 62.9
(FOS=3) (m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
18.3
Total 0.0 4375.2 0.0 36675.8
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c * N yz * N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
7.1
Reduced Level Layer 2c * N yz * N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 62.9 62.9
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
7.1
Total 0.0 5552.9 0.0 19467.7
Passive relief due to (-ve) surcharge upto RL 62.9 m Surcharge height = 0.251 m
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N y z * N
(m) (kN /m^2) (degree) (kN / m^2)
LWL 70.0
-4.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.736
Well cap bottom 74.0
11.1 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.736
End of Layer 1 62.9
0.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.736
Well kerb top 0.0
0.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.736
End Layer 2 0.0
0.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 0.0 5.736
Foundation Level 0.0
7.1
LWL 70.0
-4.0 14.4 10.3 2.0 -294.2 72.0 -2675.4
Well cap bottom 74.0
11.1 14.4 6.5 2.0 518.5 68.4 2874.7
End of Layer 1 62.9
0.0 14.4 6.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Well kerb top 0.0
0.0 14.4 6.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
End Layer 2 0.0
0.0 0.0 6.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Foundation Level 0.0
7.1
Total 224.3 199.3
Case 1
Calculation for Loads and Moments upto RL 62.9 m
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 62.9 m and @ cg of Foundation Level
16.0 Front Fill on Well cap 18.8 18.0 338.6 2.1 710.7
17.0 Well Cap (Left elliptical portion) 71.8 22.5 1614.4 0.0 0.0
18.0 Rectangular portion 20.5 22.5 461.3 0.0 0.0
19.0 Well Cap (Right elliptical portion) 32.2 22.5 724.5 0.0 0.0
20.0 Intermediate Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
21.0 Well Steining 191.6 22.5 4310.9 0.0 0.0
22.0 Bottom Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
23.0 Well Kerb 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
24.0 Sump in Bottom Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
25.0 Sand Fill 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
26.0 Earth on Well Kerb 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Loads upto Well Cap Top Level SHIFT TILT Total Loads below Well Cap Top Level TILT
Mts .= 10344.5 x ( 0.150 + 13.1 ) + 7111.1 x 13.1 = 3825.8 kNm
80.0 160.0
MR Mts
Total Resultant Moment = 54746 + 3826 = 58572 kNm
= 1010.2 + 1873
= 2883.6 kPa
= 1010.2 - 1873.3
= -863.1 kPa
= 0.9 < 6.1
Section is uncracked
Check for safety of section 1.0 + 1.9 = 0.4 < 1.0 Hence OK
6.3 8.3
Case2
Live Load Surcharge
Layer Ka = 0.3 Moment @ Moment @
Reduced Level thickness Pressure Length Force c.g. of force 52.0 76.0
(m) (kN / m^2) (kN. m) (kN. m)
Deck Level 81.2
5.6 6.0 10.3 347.0 78.4 9156.4 831.1
HFL 75.6
-0.4 6.0 10.3 -25.4 75.8 -603.2 5.2
Well cap top 76.0
2.0 6.0 10.3 123.7 75.0 2844.3
Well cap bottom 74.0
1.0 6.0 6.5 39.2 73.5 843.0
End Layer 1 73.0
6.0 6.0 6.5 234.5 70.0 4220.7
MSL 67.0
2.0 6.0 6.5 78.5 66.0 1099.4
End of Layer 2 65.0
2.0 6.0 6.5 78.5 64.0 942.5
End of Layer 3 63.0
9.3 6.0 6.5 365.3 58.4 2322.2
Well kerb top 53.7
1.7 6.0 6.7 68.2 52.9 58.0
Foundation Level 52.0
29.2 1309.5 20883 836.3
Copy of Abutment_well
Case 2
Active Earth Pressure(Normal Case)(HFL Case)
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c / N yz / N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
29.2
Copy of Abutment_well
Reduced Level Layer -2c / N yz / N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @ Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 52.0 52.0 76.0 76.0
(m) (m) c c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
29.2
Total 0.0 6515.1 0.0 88456.2 0.0 1208.3
15.0
Reduced Level Layer 2c * N yz * N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 52.0 52.0
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
15.0
Total 0.0 19749.8 0.0 95995.8
Case 2
It is assumed that point of zero shear will be at a distance of Z m below from Layer 2.
393.7 +
797.5 + 39.2 Z +
0.0 + 0.0 Z +
3.0
0.0 + 0.0 Z +
3.0
26.8 + 40.2 Z
3.0
This means, Point of zero shear will be at a distance of 6.7 m in layer 2 i.e. at RL 58.3 m
Copy of Abutment_well
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c / N yz / N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
22.9
Copy of Abutment_well
Reduced Level Layer -2c / N yz / N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 58.3 58.3
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
22.9
Total 0.0 4285.9 0.0 50475.6
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c * N yz * N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
8.7
Reduced Level Layer 2c * N yz * N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 58.3 58.3
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
8.7
Total 0.0 6183.6 0.0 17564.0
Passive relief due to (-ve) surcharge upto RL 58.3 m Surcharge height = 0.3 m
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N y z * N
(m) (kN /m^2) (degree) (kN / m^2)
MSL 67.0
2.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
End of Layer 2 65.0
6.7 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
End of Layer 3 58.3
0.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 0.0 5.7
Well kerb top 53.7
0.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 0.0 5.7
Foundation Level 52.0
8.7
MSL 67.0
2.0 14.4 6.5 3.0 62.3 66.0 479.9
End of Layer 2 65.0
6.7 14.4 6.5 3.0 208.8 61.7 699.1
End of Layer 3 58.3
0.0 0.0 6.5 2.0 0.0 53.7 0.0
Well kerb top 53.7
0.0 0.0 6.7 2.0 0.0 52.0 0.0
Foundation Level 52.0
8.7
Total 271.1 1178.9
Case 2
Calculation for Loads and Moments upto RL 58.3 m
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 58.3 m and @ cg of Foundation Level
16.0 Front Fill on Well cap 18.8 10.0 188.1 2.1 394.8
17.0 Well Cap (Left elliptical portion) 71.8 22.5 1614.4 0.0 0.0
Rectangular portion 20.5 22.5 461.3 0.0 0.0
18.0 Well Cap (Right elliptical portion) 32.2 22.5 724.5 0.0 0.0
19.0 Intermediate Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
20.0 Well Steining 270.8 22.5 6093.6 0.0 0.0
21.0 Bottom Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
22.0 Well Kerb 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
23.0 Sump in Bottom Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
24.0 Sand Fill 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
25.0 Earth on Well Kerb 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Loads upto Well Cap Top Level SHIFT TILT Total Loads below Well Cap Top Level TILT
Mts .= 9589.2 x ( 0.150 + 17.7 ) + 8893.8 x 17.7 = 4539.3 kNm
80.0 160.0
MR Mts
Total Resultant Moment = 73413 + 4539 = 77952 kNm
Copy of Abutment_well
= 1070 + 2851
= 3921 kPa
= 1070 - 2851
= -1781 kPa
= 1.78 < 6.10
Section is uncracked
Check for safety of section 1.1 + 2.9 = 0.5 < 1.0 Hence OK
6.3 8.3
Case3
Live Load Surcharge (Seismic Case) (LWL Case)
Layer Ka = 0.3 Moment @ Moment @
Reduced Level thickness Pressure Length Force c.g. of force 52.0 76.0
(m) (kN / m^2) (kN. m) (kN. m)
Deck Level 81.2
5.2 6.0 10.3 321.7 78.6 8553.1 836.3
Well cap top(Assumed RSL) 76.0
6.0 6.0 10.3 370.5 73.0 7779.4 0.0
LWL 70.0
-4.0 6.0 10.3 -246.8 72.0 -4935.1
Well cap bottom 74.0
1.0 6.0 6.5 39.2 73.5 843.0
End Layer 1 73.0
6.0 6.0 6.5 234.5 70.0 4220.7
RSL 67.0
2.0 6.0 6.5 78.5 66.0 1099.4
End of Layer 2 65.0
2.0 6.0 6.5 78.5 64.0 942.5
End of Layer 3 63.0
9.3 6.0 6.5 365.3 58.4 2322.2
Well kerb top 53.7
1.7 6.0 6.7 68.2 52.9 58.0
Foundation Level 52.0
29.2 1309.5 20883 836.3
Reduced Level Layer -2c / N yz / N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @ Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 52.0 52.0 76.0 76.0
(m) (m) c c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
Deck Level 81.2 0.0
5.2 0.0 38.0 10.3 1.0 0.0 1.0 1012.4 78.6 77.7 0.0 26042.0 0.0 1754.8
Well cap top(Assumed RSL) 76.0 38.0
6.0 0.0 81.7 10.3 1.0 0.0 1.0 3675.8 73.0 72.6 0.0 75831.4 0.0 0.0
LWL 70.0 81.7
-4.0 0.0 65.6 10.3 1.6 0.0 1.6 -1882.6 72.0 71.9 0.0 -37504.8
Well cap bottom 74.0 65.6
1.0 0.0 69.6 6.5 1.6 0.0 1.6 274.6 73.5 73.5 0.0 5898.9
End Layer 1 73.0 69.6
6.0 0.0 93.9 6.5 1.6 0.0 1.6 1984.8 70.0 69.9 0.0 35436.4
RSL 67.0 93.9
2.0 0.0 102.0 6.5 1.6 0.0 1.6 795.7 66.0 66.0 0.0 11138.8
End of Layer 2 65.0 102.0
2.0 0.0 110.1 6.5 1.6 0.0 1.6 861.6 64.0 64.0 0.0 10339.8
End of Layer 3 63.0 110.1
9.3 0.0 147.9 6.5 1.6 0.0 1.6 4880.8 58.4 58.1 0.0 29914.7
Well kerb top 53.7 147.9
1.7 0.0 154.8 6.7 1.6 0.0 1.6 1069.4 52.9 52.8 0.0 902.1
Foundation Level 52.0
29.2
Total 0.0 12672.4 0.0 157999.3 0.0 1754.8
Reduced Level Layer 2c * N yz * N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 52.0 52.0
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
18.0
Total 0.0 38977.0 0.0 248740.2
Layer 70.0 m
Reduced Level thickness c N y z * N
(m) (kN /m^2) (degree) (kN / m^2)
6.2
53.7 m
Reduced Level Layer yz * N Projected (FOS) Force c.g. of force Moment @
thickness Length of we (kN) 52.0 6.2
(m) c
(kN.m) 52.0 m
LWL 70.0
-4.0 6.2 10.3 1.6 -158.0 72.0 -3158.7 Passive relief due to (-ve) surcharge
Well cap bottom 74.0
1.0 6.2 6.5 1.6 25.1 73.5 539.6
End Layer 1 73.0
6.0 6.2 6.5 1.6 150.1 70.0 2701.4
RSL 67.0
2.0 6.2 6.5 1.6 50.2 66.0 703.7
End of Layer 2 65.0
2.0 6.2 6.5 1.6 50.2 64.0 603.2
End of Layer 3 63.0
9.3 6.2 6.5 1.6 233.8 58.4 1486.3
Well kerb top 53.7
1.7 6.2 6.7 1.6 43.7 52.9 37.1
Foundation Level 52.0
18.0
Total 395.1 2912.6
574.4 +
445.4 + 39.2 Z +
0.0 + 0.0 Z +
1.6
0.0 + 0.0 Z +
1.6
-158.0 + 40.2 Z
1.6
Copy of Abutment_well
This means, Point of zero shear will be at a distance of 12.0 m in layer 2 i.e. at RL 62.0 m
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c / N yz / N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
19.2
Copy of Abutment_well
Reduced Level Layer -2c / N yz / N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 62.0 62.0
(FOS=3) (m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
19.2
Total 0.0 4946.4 0.0 41451.6
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c * N yz * N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
8.0
Copy of Abutment_well
Reduced Level Layer 2c * N yz * N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 62.0 62.0
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
8.0
Total 0.0 3665.0 0.0 13452.1
Passive relief due to (-ve) surcharge upto RL 62.0 m Surcharge height = 0.3 m
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N y z * N
(m) (kN /m^2) (degree) (kN / m^2)
LWL 70.0
-4.0 0.0 25.0 2.5 10.0 6.2 5.7
Well cap bottom 74.0
12.0 0.0 25.0 2.5 10.0 6.2 5.7
End Layer 1 62.0
0.0 0.0 25.0 2.5 10.0 6.2 5.7
MSL 0.0
0.0 0.0 25.0 2.5 10.0 6.2 5.7
End of Layer 2 0.0
0.0 0.0 25.0 2.5 10.0 0.0 5.7
End of Layer 3 0.0
0.0 0.0 25.0 2.5 10.0 0.0 5.7
Well kerb top 0.0
0.0 0.0 25.0 2.5 10.0 0.0 5.7
Foundation Level 0.0
8.0
Copy of Abutment_well
LWL 70.0
-4.0 6.2 10.3 1.6 -158.0 72.0 -1579.4
Well cap bottom 74.0
12.0 6.2 6.5 1.6 301.1 68.0 1805.6
End Layer 1 62.0
0.0 6.2 6.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
MSL 0.0
0.0 6.2 6.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
End of Layer 2 0.0
0.0 0.0 6.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
End of Layer 3 0.0
0.0 0.0 6.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Well kerb top 0.0
0.0 0.0 6.7 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Foundation Level 0.0
8.0
Total 143.1 226.2
Case 3
Calculation for Loads and Moments upto RL 62.0 m
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 62.0 m and @ cg of Foundation Level
16.0 Front Fill on Well cap 18.8 18.0 338.6 2.1 710.7
17.0 Well Cap (Left elliptical portion) 71.8 22.5 1614.4 0.0 0.0
18.0 Rectangular portion 20.5 22.5 461.3 0.0 0.0
1.0 Well Cap (Right elliptical portion) 32.2 22.5 724.5 0.0 0.0
2.0 Intermediate Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3.0 Well Steining 207.2 22.5 4662.5 0.0 0.0
4.0 Bottom Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5.0 Well Kerb 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6.0 Sump in Bottom Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
7.0 Sand Fill 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8.0 Earth on Well Kerb 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Loads and Moment at Well Foundation 17807.2 2940.5
Total Loads upto Well Cap Top Level SHIFT TILT Total Loads below Well Cap Top Level TILT
Mts .= ( 10344.5 + 149 x ( 0.150 + 14 ) + ( 7463 + 0 ) x 14.0
80 160.0
= 4062 kNm
MR Mts
Total Resultant Moment = 64438 + 4062 = 68500 kNm
= 1039.2 + 2640
= 3679.0 kPa
Copy of Abutment_well
= 1039.2 - 2639.8
= -1601 kPa
= 1.6 < 6.1
Section is uncracked
Check for safety of section 1.0 + 2.6 = 0.5 < 1.0 Hence OK
6.3 8.3
Case4
Live Load Surcharge
Case4
Active Earth Pressure(Seismic Case)(HFL Case)
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c / N yz / N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
29.2
Copy of Abutment_well
Reduced Level Layer -2c / N yz / N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @ Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 52.0 52.0 76.0 76.0
(m) (m) c c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
29.2
Total 0.0 7352.6 0.0 94095.8 0.0 1208.3
15.0
Reduced Level Layer 2c * N yz * N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of wel c to c soil c 52.0 52.0
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
15.0
Total 0.0 24687.3 0.0 119994.8
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N y z * N
(m) (kN /m^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) 67.0 m
RSL 67.0
2.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
End of Layer 2 65.0 14.4 65.0 m
2.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
End of Layer 3 63.0
9.3 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7 63.0 m
Well kerb top 53.7 14.4
1.7 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
Foundation Level 52.0
14.4 53.7 m
15.0
14.4 52.0 m
15.0
Total 879.8 6589.0
Case4
It is assumed that point of zero shear will be at a distance of Z m below from RSL.
574.4 +
719.1 + 39.2 Z +
0.0 + 0.0 Z +
1.6
0.0 + 0.0 Z +
2.4
0.0 + 93.5 Z
1.6
Copy of Abutment_well
This means, Point of zero shear will be at a distance of 8.2 m from RSL i.e. at RL 58.8 m
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c / N yz / N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
22.3
Copy of Abutment_well
Reduced Level Layer -2c / N yz / N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 58.8 58.8
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
22.3
Total 0.0 7392.5 0.0 75090.2
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N 2c * N yz * N
(m) (kg / cm^2) (degree) (kN / m^2) (kN / m^2)
Reduced Level Layer 2c * N yz * N Projected (FOS) Force due (FOS) Force due to c.g. of force c.g. of force Moment @ Moment @
thickness Length of well c to c soil c 58.8 58.8
(m) (m) c
(kN) (kN) (m) (m) (kN.m) (kN.m)
8.2
Total 0.0 2674.2 0.0 7284.9
Passive relief due to (-ve) surcharge upto RL 58.8 m Surcharge height = 0.3 m
Layer
Reduced Level thickness c N y z * N
(m) (kN /m^2) (degree) (kN / m^2)
RSL 67.0
8.2 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
End of Layer 2 58.8
0.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
End of Layer 3 63.0
0.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
Well kerb top 53.7
0.0 0.0 25.0 5.7 10.0 14.4 5.7
Foundation Level 52.0
8.2
RSL 67.0
8.2 14.4 6.5 1.6 477.7 62.9 1951.9
End of Layer 2 58.8
0.0 14.4 6.5 1.6 0.0 63.0 0.0
End of Layer 3 63.0
0.0 14.4 6.5 1.6 0.0 53.7 0.0
Well kerb top 53.7
0.0 14.4 6.7 1.6 0.0 52.0 0.0
Foundation Level 52.0
8.2
Total 477.7 1951.9
Case 4
Calculation for Loads and Moments upto RL 58.8 m
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 58.8 m and @ cg of Foundation Level
17.0 Well Cap (Left elliptical portion) 71.8 22.5 1614.4 0.0 0.0
18.0 Rectangular portion 20.5 22.5 461.3 0.0 0.0
19.0 Well Cap (Right elliptical portion) 32.2 22.5 724.5 0.0 0.0
20.0 Intermediate Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
21.0 Well Steining 261.8 22.5 5889.7 0.0 0.0
22.0 Bottom Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
23.0 Well Kerb 0.0 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
24.0 Sump in Bottom Plug 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
25.0 Sand Fill 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
26.0 Earth on Well Kerb 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Loads upto Well Cap Top Level SHIFT TILT Total Loads below Well Cap Top Level TILT
Mts .= ( 9589.2 + 141.0 x ( 0.150 17.1 ) + ( 8689.9 + 0.0 ) x 17.1
80.0 160.0
= 4476.8 kNm
MR Mts
Total Resultant Moment = 101777 + 4477 = 106254 kNm
= 1058 + 4672
= 5729 kPa
= 1058 - 4672
= -3614 kPa
= 3.6 < 6.1
Section is uncracked
Check for safety of section 1.1 + 4.7 = 0.7 < 1.0 Hence OK
6.3 8.3
Copy of Abutment_well
2
Area of steel for each face = 20734.51 = 10367 mm
2
Provide 36.000 bars of 20.000 mm dia at each face ( Providing = 11310 mm^2 Hence OK
b. Transverse reinforcement.
Provide 18.00 Nos. 25.00 dia bar around the periphery. No. of bars in top layer = 5.00
72.00 Nos. of stirrups 12.00 dia in well kerb. No. of bars in bottom layer = 1.00
72.00 sets 6.00 Nos. of links 12.00 dia in one set.
Clear cover = 75.00 mm
Unit wt. of steel = 7850.00 kg / m^3
925.0
225.0
1550.00
65.00
=
3.14 x 6451.00 x 3.85 x 7.00 = 546.38 kg
Bar mark 8.00 to 12.00 5.00 Dia = 5575.000
Total 1291.9 kg
Balance to be provided in the form of stirups and ties = 1555.15 - 1291.94 = 263.21 Kg
Wt. of stirrups
925
225.0
1550.0
1579.6
65.00
Stirrups
Perimetre of one stirrups = 4344.63 mm
Links
Average Length of one link = 462.50 mm
Total length of the one set of strip and link = 4344.63 + 2775.00 = 7119.63 mm
Total wt. of reinforcement provided in curb = 1291.94 + 454.87 = 1747 > 1555 kg
Hence OK
Design of Return Wall Design of Abutment Well
0.300 m 3.500 m X
0.300 m
2.633 m
1 dy
1.5
Earth pressure due to live load surcharge = 0.279 x 18.000 x 1.200 = 6.035 kN/m^2
= 1.125 x 56.888
Mx = 63.999 kN.m
= 244.000 mm
Provide 12.000 mm dia bar @ 150.000 mm c/c horizontally on earth face. ( Provided steel = 753.98 mm^2/m )
Provide 10.000 mm dia bar @ 150.000 mm c/c horizontally on other face. ( Provided steel = 523.60 mm^2/m )
Provide 10.000 mm dia bar @ 150.000 mm c/c vertically on both faces. ( Provided steel = 523.60 mm^2/m )
This return will also bend in a vertical plane due to its self wt.
Moment due to railing kerb = 0.300 x 0.450 x 3.500 x 24.000 x 1.750 = 19.845 kN.m
d ^2 = 8.58E+07 = 155007.23
1.844 x 300.000
= 2538.33 mm
Check : This steel should not be less than 0.200 % of bt.d as per 305.16 of IRC : 21.
Provide 6.000 bars of 20.000 mm dia at top face in two layers. ( Providing = 1885.0 mm^2
Provide 3.000 bars of 12.000 mm dia at bottom in sloping face. ( Providing = 339.3 mm^2
Kangsabati 93/1 on NH - 6
Copy of Abutment_well
Surcharge Pressure
0.279 x 18.00 x 1.20 = 6.04 kN/m^2
6.04
2.98 m
14.97 kN/m^2
= 240.00 mm
Increasing this by 50% to resist the increased tensile forces due to non linear stress pattern above the bracket.( as suggested by note 8 of enclosure to
Ministry of Surface Transport (India) Circular no. RW/NH - 34015 / 2 / 86 - S & R dated 22.6.94)
Provide 16.00 mm dia bar @ 100.00 mm c/c as vertical steel at earth face. ( Provided steel = 2010.6 mm^2/m )
Copy of Abutment_well
Provide 10.00 mm dia bar @ 150.00 mm c/c as vertical steel at earth face. ( Provided steel = 523.60 mm^2/m )
Provide 12.00 mm dia bar @ 150.00 mm c/c as vertical steel at earth face. ( Provided steel = 753.98 mm^2/m )
Provide 10.00 mm dia bar @ 150.00 mm c/c as vertical steel at earth face. ( Provided steel = 523.60 mm^2/m )
Copy of Abutment_well
S.No. Case P Ml Mt
(kN) (kN-m) (kN-m)
A) Normal Case
1.00 LWL Condition with Maximum Live Load 6670.85 5407.23 1857.09
2.00 HFL Condition with Minimum Live Load 5965.47 5071.16 900.42
B) Seismic Case(Longitudinal)
3.00 LWL Condition with Maximum Live Load 6670.85 6507.26 1857.09
4.00 HFL Condition with Minimum Live Load 5965.47 5624.01 900.42
X X
100.00 cm
Y
1025.00 cm
Abutment Section
Adopting
Modular ratio , m = 10.00
(Both in Tension as well in Compression)
Dia. of Bars 2.00 cm
No. of Bars on each longer face of abutment(tension face) = 80.00 128
Dia. of Bars 1.60 cm
No. of Bars on each longer face of abutment(compression face) = 80.00 128
No. of Bars on each Shorter face of Abutment(both face) = 6.00 167
Total bars in Section = 172.00
Steel Area As = 436.30 cm^2
% of Steel = 0.43 %
Effective Cover = 7.00 cm
Y
251.33 cm^2
505.50 cm
Y
Permissible Stresses
Minimum Gross Moment of Inertia , Imin. = 8.54E+07 cm^4
Area of Section = 1.03E+05 cm^2
Hence Least radius of Gyration,r = Imin/Ag = 0.29 m
Copy of Abutment_well
Effective Length of Abutment Shaft (Refer Notes :(2) and (3) at Page 42 of IRC:21-1987)
Note:- The design for cracked section in the succeeding pages has been carried out as per computer
programme, which is based on "Behaviour of columns and walls" in the book entitled " Reinforced Concrete
Structural Elements " by P. Purushothaman .
As per clause 306.3.2 the diameter of transverse reinforcement of any type should not be less than one
quarter the diameter of the largest longitudinal bar in the column and in no case less than 8 mm
The diameter of the main longitudinal bar is 20 mm, hence required dia of transverse reinforcement is 10 mm
However provide 10 mm dia binders and ties.
As per clause 306.3.3 of IRC: 21- 1987 the pitch of transverse reinforcement should not exceed
(i) 300.00 mm
(ii) The least lateral dimension of the column = 1000.00 mm
(iii) 12 times the dia of the smallest longitudinal bar = 240.00 mm
As the cap is fully supported on the abutment. Minimum thickness of the cap required as per cl. 716.2.1 of IRC : 78- 1983 is 225 mm.
However the thickness of abutment cap is kep 900.0 mm.
Top Face
Provide 10.0 bar of 16.0 mm dia bar as longitudnal steel on top face of abutment cap. ( Provided steel = 2010.6 mm^2
Provide 16.0 mm dia bar @ 150.0 mm c/c stirrups throughout in length of abutment cap. ( Provided steel = 1340.4 mm^2/m )
Provide 10.0 bar of 16.0 mm dia bar as longitudnal steel on bottom face of abutment cap. ( Provided steel 2010.6 mm^2
Provide 16.0 mm dia bar @ 150.0 mm c/c stirrups throughout in length of the abutment cap. ( Provided steel = 1340.4 mm^2/m )
Copy of Abutment_well
The well cap has been designed as partillay restrained at supports and following coefficients have been adopted for the design of circular well cap under uniformly distibuted load.
The load transmitted by abutment is assumed to have been dispersed at 45 degree upto effective depth of well cap.
Moment at Abutment (from left span) = 393.68 x ( 78.51 -75.99 ) = 393.68 x 2.52 = 993.0 kN
(Due to long. Force)
Vertical Loads (P) and their Moments (ML) along L-L Axis
At RL @ 75.99 m and @ cg of Pier Shaft
2 2
Equation of the ellipse is given by X + Y = 1.00
A2 B2
Y ^2 = 0.00 Y = 0.00 m
5.13 ^2 ** on elliptical side only
Abutment length
Dispersion length (Elliptical side) = 10.25 + 2.00 x 0.00 = 5.13 m
2.00
Dispersion area for both side = 2.39 x 5.13 + 2.39 x 10.25 = 36.71 m2
Backfill above well cap in 1.89 from the face of abutment shaft = 10.25 x 1.89 x 5.20 x 18.00 = 1810.87 kN
eL of backfill = -0.69 m
Front fill above well cap in 1.89 from the face of abutment shaft = 5.13 x 1.89 x 1.21 x 18.00 = 209.96 kN
eL of frontfill = 2.03 m
Total weight of well cap (on dispersed area) = 6670.85 + 1810.87 + 209.96 = 8691.67 kN
Self wt. of well cap / m^2 = ( 75.99 + -73.99 ) x 14.00 = 28.00 kN / m^2
Total weight (including well cap) / m^2 = 236.78 + 28.00 = 264.78 kN / m^2
Transverse Analysis
To resist this moment a couple will be formed with reaction = 388.92 = 70.71 kN / m
at one support upward and at other support downward 5.50
(+ve) moment at centre due to formation of this couple = 70.71 x 5.50 = 194.46 kNm
2.00
(-ve) moment at centre due to formation of this couple = -70.71 x 5.50 = -194.46 kNm
2.00
Copy of Abutment_well
Sagging moment at center due to well cap = 264.78 x 5.50 ^2 = 266.99 kN.m
30.00
Hogging moment at center due to well cap = 264.78 x 5.50 ^2 = -133.49 kN.m
60.00
Hogging moment at center due to well cap = 264.78 x 2.83 ^2 = -1057.98 kN.m
2.00
Longitudnal Analysis
Total Longitudnal moment transfered from backfill = 1810.87 x -0.69 = -1256.29 kN.m
Total Longitudnal moment transfered from frontfill = 209.96 x 2.03 = 426.14 kN.m
To resist this moment a couple will be formed with reaction = 893.09 = 162.38 kN / m
at one support upward and at other support downward 5.50
(+ve) moment at centre due to formation of this couple = 162.38 x ( 5.50 -1.00 ) = 365.35 kNm
2.00
(+ve) moment at centre due to formation of this couple = -162.38 x ( 5.50 -1.00 ) = -365.35 kNm
2.00
Copy of Abutment_well
Sagging moment at center due to well cap = 264.78 x 5.50 ^2 = 266.99 kN.m
30.00
Hogging moment at center due to well cap = 264.78 x 5.50 ^2 = -133.49 kN.m
60.00
Provide 25.00 mm dia @ 150.00 c/c in both direction at top and bottom, provided 3272.49 mm^2 Hence OK
Assume Shear Reinforcement provided @ 150.00 mm spacing along the length of well Cap.
= 1591.32 kN
Provide 2.00 legged 16.00 dia bar @ 150.00 mm along the Length of Well Cap.( Providing 402.12 mm^2)
Copy of Abutment_well
Available Data
Well Cap Top Level = 75.990 m Well Cap Bottom Level = 73.99 m
Foundation Level = 52.000 m MSL = 67.013 m
Diameter of well at foundation Lvl = 6.650 m Factor of Safety = 2.5
s c = 1.300 i c = 1.000
s q = 1.200 i q = 1.000
s = 0.600 i = 1.000
d c = 1.000 + 0.200 x Df x N
B
1.000 + 0.200 x 15.013 x 1.570
6.650
d c = 1.709
d q = 1.000 + 0.100 x Df x N
B
1.000 + 0.100 x 15.013 x 1.570
6.650
d q = 1.354