FEBRUARY 5 Marital disqualification, Rule 130, section 22 (differentiate from relative incompetencies) US v Concepcion, G.R.

10396, July 29, 1915, 31 Phil. 182 Lezama v Rodriguez, G.R. L-25643, June 27, 1968, 23 SCRA 1166 People v Castaneda, G.R. L-46306, February 27, 1979, 88 SCRA 562 Relative Incompetencies Dead man’s statute, Rule 130, section 23 Guerrero v St. Claires Realty, G.R. L-58164, Sept 2, 1983, 124 SCRA 553 Goni v Court of Appeals, G.R. L-27434, Sept 23, 1986, 144 SCRA 222 Razon v IAC, G.R. 74306, March 16, 1992, 207 SCRA 234 Privilege Communications, Rule 130, section 24 U.S. v Antipolo, G.R. 13109, March 6, 1918, 37 Phil. 726 Krohn v Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108854, June 14, 1994, 233 SCRA 146 Regala v Sandiganbayan, G.R. 105938, Sept 20, 1996, 262 SCRA 124 People v Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 115439-41, July 16, 1997, 275 SCRA 505 Lim v Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 91114, Sept. 25, 1992, 214 SCRA 273 Neri v Senate, G.R. No. 180643. March 25, 2008, 549 SCRA 77 Banco Filipino v Monetary Board, G.R. L-70054, July 8, 1986, 142 SCRA 523 People v Capulong, G.R. L-65674, April 15, 1988, 160 SCRA 533

March 18. 175 SCRA 216 distinguished from declaration against interest. G.R.R. 86 SCRA 667. April 27. L-34248. 1967.R. G. 211 SCRA 374 People v Molleda.R. G. December 6.R. rule 130 sections 26 Purpose of rule. Articles 229 and 230. G. G.FEBRUARY 8 See also. 50 Phil. see rule 130 section 26 and section 33 See also 1986 Consti. article III People v Lorenzo. Act Nos. 85215. 701 People v Ayson. 1992. Rule 130 Section 25 Admissions and Confessions Admission against interests. 23 Phil. 7707.R. No. L-21724. 110107. 1989. 132 Admission and confession differentiated. G. 1912. 578 Juan Ysmael and Co v Hasim. Rep. July 10. 1995. 19 SCRA 861 . 41420. see rule 130 section 38 Concept of self serving evidence NDC v Workmen’s Compensation. 53 and 1477 Article 215 Civil Code. G. Revised Penal Code Testimonial Privilege. US v Ching Po. 1927. 26247. 240 SCRA 624 CMS Logging v Court of Appeals. July 7.R. Jan 26.

G. March 18. July 20.G.Exceptions “Testimonial rehabilitation” multiple admissibility Admission by conduct People v Sope and Cruz G. 84 SCRA 105 (requisites) . 97 Phil 940 Admission by Silence. 80262. 1993.R.R. 30 Phil. 1946. No.R. 810 People v Ocampo. 1978. 118 People v Yatco. November 28. 1915. L-44060. L-9181. 1955. September 1. G.R. No. 9943. G. L-16. 226 SCRA 1 Admission by declaration Sison v Ambalada.R. 75 Phil. January 31. (qui tacet consentire videtur) rule 130 section 32 People v Paragsa.