FEBRUARY 5 Marital disqualification, Rule 130, section 22 (differentiate from relative incompetencies) US v Concepcion, G.R.

10396, July 29, 1915, 31 Phil. 182 Lezama v Rodriguez, G.R. L-25643, June 27, 1968, 23 SCRA 1166 People v Castaneda, G.R. L-46306, February 27, 1979, 88 SCRA 562 Relative Incompetencies Dead man’s statute, Rule 130, section 23 Guerrero v St. Claires Realty, G.R. L-58164, Sept 2, 1983, 124 SCRA 553 Goni v Court of Appeals, G.R. L-27434, Sept 23, 1986, 144 SCRA 222 Razon v IAC, G.R. 74306, March 16, 1992, 207 SCRA 234 Privilege Communications, Rule 130, section 24 U.S. v Antipolo, G.R. 13109, March 6, 1918, 37 Phil. 726 Krohn v Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108854, June 14, 1994, 233 SCRA 146 Regala v Sandiganbayan, G.R. 105938, Sept 20, 1996, 262 SCRA 124 People v Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 115439-41, July 16, 1997, 275 SCRA 505 Lim v Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 91114, Sept. 25, 1992, 214 SCRA 273 Neri v Senate, G.R. No. 180643. March 25, 2008, 549 SCRA 77 Banco Filipino v Monetary Board, G.R. L-70054, July 8, 1986, 142 SCRA 523 People v Capulong, G.R. L-65674, April 15, 1988, 160 SCRA 533

26247. 1912. Rule 130 Section 25 Admissions and Confessions Admission against interests. Rep.R. March 18. US v Ching Po. July 7. rule 130 sections 26 Purpose of rule. 1995. Act Nos. L-21724. G. 1927. G. see rule 130 section 26 and section 33 See also 1986 Consti.R.R. 50 Phil. 175 SCRA 216 distinguished from declaration against interest. Jan 26. December 6. 85215.FEBRUARY 8 See also. July 10.R. Revised Penal Code Testimonial Privilege. 7707.R. April 27. 240 SCRA 624 CMS Logging v Court of Appeals.R. 41420. 53 and 1477 Article 215 Civil Code. 1992. G. 578 Juan Ysmael and Co v Hasim. 110107. 23 Phil. G. No. see rule 130 section 38 Concept of self serving evidence NDC v Workmen’s Compensation. Articles 229 and 230. 701 People v Ayson. 1989. 132 Admission and confession differentiated. 19 SCRA 861 . L-34248. G. G. 86 SCRA 667. 211 SCRA 374 People v Molleda. 1967. article III People v Lorenzo.R. G.

R. 226 SCRA 1 Admission by declaration Sison v Ambalada.R. L-9181.Exceptions “Testimonial rehabilitation” multiple admissibility Admission by conduct People v Sope and Cruz G.R. No. 9943. (qui tacet consentire videtur) rule 130 section 32 People v Paragsa. March 18. 97 Phil 940 Admission by Silence. G. 1978. July 20. September 1. G. 80262. 1915. G. 810 People v Ocampo. L-44060. 1955.R. January 31. 75 Phil.R. November 28. No.G. 1993. 84 SCRA 105 (requisites) . 118 People v Yatco. 1946. L-16. 30 Phil.

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful