FEBRUARY 5 Marital disqualification, Rule 130, section 22 (differentiate from relative incompetencies) US v Concepcion, G.R.

10396, July 29, 1915, 31 Phil. 182 Lezama v Rodriguez, G.R. L-25643, June 27, 1968, 23 SCRA 1166 People v Castaneda, G.R. L-46306, February 27, 1979, 88 SCRA 562 Relative Incompetencies Dead mans statute, Rule 130, section 23 Guerrero v St. Claires Realty, G.R. L-58164, Sept 2, 1983, 124 SCRA 553 Goni v Court of Appeals, G.R. L-27434, Sept 23, 1986, 144 SCRA 222 Razon v IAC, G.R. 74306, March 16, 1992, 207 SCRA 234 Privilege Communications, Rule 130, section 24 U.S. v Antipolo, G.R. 13109, March 6, 1918, 37 Phil. 726 Krohn v Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 108854, June 14, 1994, 233 SCRA 146 Regala v Sandiganbayan, G.R. 105938, Sept 20, 1996, 262 SCRA 124 People v Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 115439-41, July 16, 1997, 275 SCRA 505 Lim v Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 91114, Sept. 25, 1992, 214 SCRA 273 Neri v Senate, G.R. No. 180643. March 25, 2008, 549 SCRA 77 Banco Filipino v Monetary Board, G.R. L-70054, July 8, 1986, 142 SCRA 523 People v Capulong, G.R. L-65674, April 15, 1988, 160 SCRA 533

FEBRUARY 8 See also, Rep. Act Nos. 53 and 1477 Article 215 Civil Code, Articles 229 and 230, Revised Penal Code Testimonial Privilege, Rule 130 Section 25 Admissions and Confessions Admission against interests, rule 130 sections 26 Purpose of rule, US v Ching Po, G.R. 7707, December 6, 1912, 23 Phil. 578 Juan Ysmael and Co v Hasim, G.R. 26247, March 18, 1927, 50 Phil. 132 Admission and confession differentiated, see rule 130 section 26 and section 33 See also 1986 Consti, article III People v Lorenzo, G.R. 110107, Jan 26, 1995, 240 SCRA 624 CMS Logging v Court of Appeals, G.R. 41420, July 10, 1992, 211 SCRA 374 People v Molleda, G.R. L-34248, 86 SCRA 667, 701 People v Ayson, G.R. 85215, July 7, 1989, 175 SCRA 216 distinguished from declaration against interest, see rule 130 section 38 Concept of self serving evidence NDC v Workmens Compensation, G.R. No. L-21724. April 27, 1967, 19 SCRA 861

Exceptions Testimonial rehabilitation multiple admissibility Admission by conduct People v Sope and Cruz G.R. L-16, January 31, 1946, 75 Phil. 810 People v Ocampo, G.R. No. 80262, September 1, 1993, 226 SCRA 1 Admission by declaration Sison v Ambalada, G.R. 9943, March 18, 1915, 30 Phil. 118 People v Yatco,G.R. No. L-9181. November 28, 1955, 97 Phil 940 Admission by Silence, (qui tacet consentire videtur) rule 130 section 32 People v Paragsa, G.R. L-44060, July 20, 1978, 84 SCRA 105 (requisites)