Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC Asks Boeing C-17 Detractors to Produce "Internal

DoD Analyses" Supporting Kill Efforts

Describes SECDEF Efforts Against C-17 as an 'Intellectual' Assault; Re-Iterates

Position No Credible Data Exists to Support DoD Contention That Aircraft Currently
in Operation and On Order Are Sufficient to Meet Existent and Projected Strategic
Airlift Needs; Echoes Department of Commerce Description of Globemaster III as a
"National Asset"; Provides Copy of McCaffrey Report Asserting 600+ C-17 Fleet
Complement to Meet 21st Century Force Projection Needs; Issues Statement
Concerning Next Generation USAF Tanker Competition

Chicago, IL, October 01, 2009 -- UPDATE TO SEPTEMBER 28, 2009 RELEASE: Among
several items discussed in the Administration's 2010 Budget overview released this
past Friday was Boeing's C-17 Globemaster III Strategic/Tactical airlifter, and
yet again it has voiced a desire to shut down production of this critical aircraft
citing "DoD analyses".

In clear indication of a last minute ramping up of efforts to terminate C-17

production, an amendment was issued on September 29 by those in opposition to the
aircraft's continued existence.

"We were in full expectation of this move," says Myron D. Stokes, Managing Member
of Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC, a Florida incorporated, Bloomfield Hills, MI
based DLA-listed firm (www.ccr.gov) , "And it is precisely why we restated our
position via the 9/28 release.

"Since those opposed to C-17 continue to cite "internal DoD analyses" we ask,
respectfully, that they produce same. We are, of course, cognizant of the fact
that a certain mythological place of intense heat would be altered by cryogenic
intervention before such data were produced. Short story: It does not exist."

An "Intellectual" Assault
"What many who support C-17 don't really understand," says Stokes, "Is that an
intellectual assault was launched against this aircraft beginning with the GAO and
Congressionally debunked 2005/2006 Mobility Capabilities Studies (MCS) and the
2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) which repeated MCS assertions of there were
'enough' C-17s, coupled with ancient and notoriuously unreliable C-5 Galaxys. The
GAO found the study analytics were profoundly flawed, and based on unsustainable,
unrealistic conflict assumptions post 9/11.

"We must re-emphasize this is the only data to which opposition parties can be
possibly referring.

"The brilliance of this type of assault," Stokes continued," is that it's is

resistant, if not invulnerable, to typical responses. It must be understood that
the only effective response is a response in kind. Meaning, it was most
appropriate to craft and use the still officially unreleased Department of
Commerce C-17 Industrial Base Impacts Study; it was approriate to present
'Transformational Recapitalization' architecture as a means to forever eliminate
traditional budgetary wrangling; it was appropriate to highlight the findings of
the McCaffrey Report. All of these documents resoundly neutralize the arguments of
the SECDEF, the SECAF, the good Senator, and all those who are in support of this
ill-advised activity againt C-17.

"We say again, these efforts are designed to make the world safe for retro-fitted
C-5s and yet-to-fly Airbus/EADS A-400M, the latter of which EADS desperately hopes
will be acquired by the USAF. Unfortunately, the only way that Lockheed-Martin and
EADS will get their wish is if Boeing C-17, and perhaps Boeing itself (a very real
possibility if the Tanker deal is given to the Europeans) is killed.

"An 'inconvenient truth', if you will."

The McCaffrey Report 2007

"As we noted in our May 28, 2009 release, C-17 is not only absolutely essential to
current and anticipated force projection requirements in a world wherein
conventional and asymmetric conflict potential exists concomitantly," said Stokes,
"but to our plans implementing a US/NATO controlled Heavy and Outsized (HOM)
industry utilizing modestly modified variants of this superlative airlifter.

"I daresay that data from several and quite significant resources, inclusive of
the limited availability 2005/2006 Department of Commerce C-17 Industrial Base
Impacts Study, strongly, if not overwhelmingly, suggests the direction and
viewpoints articulated by our Washington colleagues relative to C-17's continued
existence is at best flawed, and at worst, not reflective of the great
responsibilities conferred upon them by the office in which they serve.

"It should be noted that while we have the greatest respect for the offices of the
SECDEF, SECAF and those to whom they report, we feel it necessary to again invoke
the wisdom, past and present, of DoD personnel such as the late VADM Arthur K.
Cebrowski, whose vast experience and knowledge cannot be ignored. In this
instance, we feel it appropriate to highlight the conclusions of decorated U.S.
Army 4-Star General (Ret'd) Barry R. McCaffrey, Adjunct Professor of International
Affairs, United States Military Academy (USMA) West Point, as outlined in an
"After Action" Report following visits to Nellis and Scott Air Force Bases 14-17
August, 2007."

The report was designed to summarize assessments of USAF capabilities and

resources in the face of current, emergent and projected threats to national
security. General McCaffrey's comments on C-17 are as follows:

2nd -- The C-17 Globemaster III.

• We must create the strategic national military airlift and air-to-air refuel
capability (600+ C-17 aircraft) to project national military and humanitarian
power in the global environment. We currently have an inadequate capability with
150 aircraft supported by an aging refueling fleet. The C-5 aircraft must be
retired—these planes are shot. The Army must back off the dubious proposition that
they will size their ground combat force around the volume and lift metrics of the
C-130 --- and instead use the C-17 as the sizing template.

• The Rumsfeld doctrine postulated bringing home deployed Army and Air Force
capabilities from Europe, Okinawa, and Korea. This seismic strategic shift was
unexamined and not debated by Congress or the American people. We are bringing
home ground and air strike assets thousands of miles--- from basing infrastructure
paid for by allies--- to unprepared US launch platforms. If we are to pose a
serious deterrent capability in the dangerous world arena--- then we must credibly
be able to project power back into future combat areas to sustain allies at risk.

• The C-17 represents the capacity to carry out this strategic power projection
mission ---as well as providing intra-theater logistics and humanitarian lift for
pin point distribution of thousands of truck load equivalents of supply per day.

• The C-17 is a global national transportation asset--- not merely a military or

Air Force system.

The whole of the report is accessible via the link

http://www.mccaffreyassociates.com/pages/documents...
and should be considered a "must read" by all concerned.
a

Knowledge is Power
K

"I will respond preemptively to those who are quick to dismiss the views and
analytics crafted by retired DoD personnel as 'irrelevant and inapplicable', by
saying that such assertions are sophomoric, unsustainable, without merit and
wholly dismissive of the Dr. W. Edwards Deming advocated pursuit of profound
knowledge," says Stokes. "To be sure, we benefit from applying accumulated
knowledge, as has been evident since humankind first saw the need to record and
preserve what was learned. The Library of Alexandria is an ancient and
extraordinary example of this premise."
e

Further commenting on the recent re-release of USAF Tanker competitive

requirements after Boeing's successful protest to the GAO against EADS/Airbus,
Stokes conveys the viewpoints of several academic, government and industrial
associates that the need to preserve C-17 is as critically important as the
necessity of having the tanker requirement fulfilled by a true US firm. "It must
be designed, developed, engineered, manufactured and sustained in the United
States. This is not jingoism, this is not nationalism, this is not representative
of a disturbing naivete as concerns the so-called "new globality", but rather, a
recognition that the country's industrial base must be maintained. Moreover, it
must be OWNED and controlled by American firms with a strongly supportive role by
the US government as is common practice by other industrialized nations.
t

"This is to say, even if the A330-based Tanker were indeed designed, engineered
and manufactured here, the question at the end of the day is 'Where does the money
go?' Answer: To overseas bank accounts. Also, 'Would there be any guarantees that
manufacturing and design would remain on these shores in the event of a global
economic schism (again) thereby resulting in calls by company stakeholders to
shrink the company's global footprint in the interests of 'fiduciary
r
responsibility?'

Based on the recorded activities of international corporations, the answer is no.

"The idea that obvious illegalities in the form of WTO disallowed EU subsidies
designed to give EADS/Airbus ( Northrop-Grumman, with its extraordinary history of
aircraft development, is nothing more than, sadly, a front to give the illusion of
"Americaness" to their overtures) a competitive advantage in price is dismissed by
DoD procurement officers as irrelevant or "having no bearing in the ultimate
decision" (paraphrased) is suggesting a departure from logic, reason, conventional
wisdom and a complete lack of of understanding that the US defense and industrial
bases are one and the same."
b

Stokes suggests a much needed expansion of the DoD's paraphrased assertion that
"we are in pursuit of the best value for the warfighter" would include '...,the
American worker and taxpayer."
A

"To be sure," Stokes further states, "No other country on earth, neither Germany,
France, Italy, Belgium, Spain, Japan, South Korea, China... no one would give away
a core element of its critical industrial base which this Tanker, as built by
Boeing with its clearly superior aircraft build skillsets, represents."
B

About Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC

Founded in 2002, GHH is a strategic air transport solutions that was born of a
multi-year public/private effort among forward thinkers in both the private sector
and government to mitigate emerging and observable vulnerabilities in the U.S.
industrial base global supply chain. Such vulnerabilities are represented by the
fact that no ocean-borne shipping is in U.S. hands at present, thus potentially
subjecting American corporations, especially automotive, and their global
operations to the whims and perhaps economically hostile activities of and by
foreign governments. Add to this the risk of terrorist activities, which have,
according to the Department of Homeland Security, targeted maritime operations;
i.e., ships, ports and ocean containers.

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) listed, it is the goal of GHH and its strategic
partners around the planet to work with key logistics personnel within these
corporations and government agencies to conceptualize, craft and structure long-
term global supply chain alternative transportation methodologies through
continuous -- not stop gap or emergency -- air augmentation solutions. Its most
important mission, however, has been in the co-development of global architecture
for infrastructure of a new American controlled industry, Heavylift, utilizing the
excellent airlift performance characteristics of the Boeing BC-17.

Contact:
John T. Chuhran
Global HeavyLift Holdings, LLC
74 W. Long Lake Rd
Suite 103
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
248-310-2650
globalheavyliftholdings@ymail.com
http://www.emotionreports.com