Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Infrared (IR) emissions from aircraft are used to detect, track, and lock-on to the target. MAN Portable Air Defence
Systems (MANPADS) have emerged as a major cause of aircraft and helicopter loss. Therefore, IR signature studies are
important to counter this threat for survivability enhancement, and are an important aspect of stealth technology. This
paper reviews contemporary developments in this discipline, with particular emphasis on IR signature prediction from
aerospace vehicles. The role of atmosphere in IR signature analysis, and relation between IR signature level and target
susceptibility are illustrated. Also, IR signature suppression systems and countermeasure techniques are discussed, to
highlight their effectiveness and implications in terms of penalties.
r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Electro-optical warfare; IR countermeasures; IR signature; IR suppression; Lethal envelop; Low observables; Stealth;
Survivability; Susceptibility
Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
1.1. Background and motivation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219
1.2. Objectives and scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
2. Genesis of aircraft IR signature studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
2.1. Developments in cold war: MANPADS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
2.2. Stealth aircraft . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
2.3. Recent developments in low observables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
3. Sources of IR signature and their estimation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
3.1. IR emissions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
3.2. IR detectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223
Abbreviations: AAM, air-to-air missile; BHO, Black Hole Ocarina; BPR, bypass ratio; CBT, centre body tailpipe; EOSAS, electro-
optical signature evaluation system; IIR, imaging infrared; IR, infrared; IRCM, IR counter-measure; IRSL, IR signature level; IRSS, IR
signature suppression; IRST, infrared search and track; IRSTORM, Infrared Seeker Trade-Off Requirements Model; MANPADS, MAN
portable air defence systems; MCP, maximum continuous power; NIRATAM, NATO Infra-Red Air Target Model; OGE, out-of-ground
effect; PRISM, Physically Reasonable Infrared Signature Model; RADAR, radio detection and ranging; RCS, radar cross-section; SAM,
surface-to-air missile; SIRRM, Standardized Infrared Radiation Model; SPIRITS, spectral infrared imaging of targets and scenes; TFE,
turbo-fan engine; TJE, turbo-jet engine; WW, World War
Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 22 25767122; fax: +91 22 25722602.
E-mail address: spm@aero.iitb.ac.in (S.P. Mahulikar).
0376-0421/$ - see front matter r 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.06.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245 219
Hitherto, RADAR was primarily used for detec- level (IRSL) and target susceptibility is reviewed, to
tion, using the target’s radar cross-section (RCS). gauge the effectiveness of IRSS systems.
Due to its active nature and developments in
countermeasures, the effectiveness of RADAR for 2. Genesis of aircraft IR signature studies
detection and tracking is being challenged. Due to
developments in the lethal anti-radiation missiles, Prior to World War (WW) I, defence establish-
RADAR detectors are under threat. Target detec- ments in USA, Britain, and Germany developed IR
tion, tracking, and lock-on, by interception of equipment for military applications. These efforts
passively emitted IR signatures, are advantageous were primarily concentrated on signalling, search,
in tactical warfare. This trend is responsible for the and night vision equipments. In 1937, IR was used
incorporation of IR signature suppression (IRSS) for the first time for air-to-air detection [6]; and
systems and IR countermeasures (IRCMs). during WW-II, IR equipments were used for the first
time for tracking [6]. After WW-II, the Soviet Union
1.2. Objectives and scope emerged as a major proponent of IR equipments [6].
However, developments in IR-detection were re-
This paper reviews studies in IR signatures of tarded by the initial success of RADAR, which
aerospace vehicles, for illustrating developments lead- attracted the major funding for development. There-
ing to the contemporary understanding. Therefore, it fore, interest in development of IR-detection systems
begins with historical developments in IR signature was confined to laboratory research until 1960 [7].
analyses, followed by an overview of prominent IR
sources in aircraft/helicopter, and their prediction 2.1. Developments in cold war: MANPADS
models. Models for predicting IR transmissivity of the
intervening atmosphere and atmospheric radiance of After WW-II, USA started the Sidewinder
IR are also discussed. Relation between IR signature program and USSR also started their anti-aircraft
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245 221
missile program. By 1967, these parallel programs reduction of IR emissions from hot engine parts,
led to the development of MANPADS; which are plume, and fuselage are also being developed by
cheap and easy to use, and proliferated world-wide. aircraft manufacturers. The atmospheric transmis-
Several variants of IR-guided surface-to-air missiles sion of IR radiation has been modelled by codes; e.g.
(SAMs) and air-to-air missiles (AAMs) were devel- LOWTRAN, MODTRAN, HITRAN (which differ
oped for specific applications (Ref. Table 1 for a in their spectral resolution). In 1998, the US Army
representative list). The MANPADS proved to be initiated the Advanced Threat IR Countermeasures
especially lethal against low flying aircraft and System (ATIRCM) and Directional IR Counter-
helicopters [4]. So far, about one million MAN- measures System (DIRCM) for aircraft [14]. The US
PADS have been manufactured worldwide [2], and Military initiated the incorporation of integrated
approximately 500,000 missiles are in circulation [8]. IRCMs on 1047 helicopters, which is expected to be
completed in a phased manner by 2014 [15]. The list
includes Special Operations Blackhawks, Special
2.2. Stealth aircraft
Operations Chinooks, Army Apache, Army Black-
hawks, Army Chinooks, and Army Kiowa warrior
Till 1970, aircraft survivability as a discipline
helicopters.
in aircraft design was not given due importance.
There have been several US patents on IR
A revolution in aircraft design priorities started with
signature reduction and management-related tech-
the first program to design stealth aircraft, Have
nologies, which include the following: (i) modifica-
Blue [9,10]. After mid-1980, aircraft survivability
tion of engine exhaust geometry to enhance mixing
was established as a major discipline, and today,
of exhaust gases with the atmosphere [16–26], (ii)
military forces consider survivability enhancement
electrical heating [27], heat pipe cooling [28], liquid
as the foremost design feature. The primary aim of
evaporative cooling [29], chemical treatment of
the Have Blue program was to defeat the RADAR-
aircraft skin [30,31], (iii) surface geometry modifica-
based defence systems, but due consideration to
tions [32], (iv) surface emissivity alteration
aircraft IR signatures was also given [11]. The first
[30,31,33,34], (v) plume signature tailoring [35],
aircraft manufactured with stealth capabilities,
(vi) IRCMs [36], etc.
F-117A, were flown in June 1981 [12]. In the Gulf
War, F-117A aircraft constituted only 2–3% of the
3. Sources of IR signature and their estimation
total 1900 fighters and bombers, but attacked 40%
of the strategic targets. A single F-117A sortie is
The discrimination between IR emissions from
equivalent to 95 sorties of aircraft used earlier in the
the target and the surrounding background leads to
Vietnam War [9].
target detection. Engine hot parts, exhaust plume,
rear fuselage, and aerodynamically heated skin, are
2.3. Recent developments in low observables the important sources of IR emission in an aircraft;
as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). The total IR signature [37]
For reducing RCS, F-117A, A-12, F/A-22, RA-66 of an aircraft can be expressed as [Ref. Fig. 1(b)]:
and B2 have modified the engine inlet and exhaust, Total signature ¼ aircraft hot parts emission+air-
have high wing sweep angles, and do not have craft plume emission+skin emission+reflected sky-
bumps, bulges, and holes [13]. Technology for shine+reflected earthshine+reflected sunshine.
Plume
Rear fuselage
Sunshine / Skyshine
Earthshine
aircraft hot
parts emission
TOTAL IR
SIGNATURE
skin emission
reflected sunshine
Fig. 1. Sources and details of IR signature of aircraft: (a) sources of IR radiance from typical fighter plane and (b) distribution and details
of IR signature of aircraft.
The attenuation of IR radiation in the atmo- transmittance is generally very poor. At higher
sphere is highly dependent on wavelength of altitudes, where H2O (vap.) and CO2 concentration
radiation, temperature, and composition of radia- is much lower, IR transmission is superior [39]. The
tion participating gases. The IR spectrum covers the 3–5 mm window corresponds to higher peak emis-
range, 0.77–1000 mm; i.e. between the visible (red sion temperature (450 1C), and is better suited for
colour) and microwave radiation. However, mainly detecting hot spots. The 8–12 mm band has lower
two atmospheric windows where the transmittance is peak emission temperature (17 1C), and is gen-
high, 3–5 and 8–12 mm, are used for surveillance erally used for emissions from larger surfaces at
and tracking. Outside these windows, attenuation lower temperatures [40].
of IR is high, due to the role of CO2 and H2O (vap.) The intensity of IR-radiation from an aircraft is
in absorption and scattering [38]. At low altitudes or not uniform in all directions, due to the anisotropic
in cloudy weather conditions, atmospheric IR nature of emission from the distributed IR sources
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245 223
on the aircraft. When viewed from front and sides, turbofans have larger IRSL than turboprops [13]. In
the plume and airframe contribute; and when helicopters [Ref. Fig. 2(b)], the main contributors of
viewed from the rear, the engine hot parts become IR signature are: (i) the engine exhaust duct, (ii) the
the major source of IR radiation. When viewed direct view of engine hot parts like the turbine
from the rear, a typical IR-guided SAM can achieve blades, (iii) the tail boom heated by exhaust plume,
a lock-on from 4–6 km, because of the direct view of and (iv) the exhaust plume.
hot engine parts at 600–7001 C [9]. The IR plot of a
typical jet-engine-powered aircraft from various 3.2. IR detectors
view angles is given in Fig. 2(a). In general, an
aircraft with a jet engine has an IR radiation Over the years, significant developments have
intensity in the range 100–1000 W/Sr, over several taken place in IR-detector technology [41], towards
viewing aspects [13]. For the same thrust level, increasing their sensitivity [i.e. reducing their Noise
turbojets have larger IRSL than turbofans, and Equivalent Irradiance (NEI)]. Current generation
1 1
0 0
Relative Intensity
30° 80°
1 0° 4
180°
0 0
2.4 3.2 4.0 4.8 2.4 3.2 4.0 4.8
λ (μm)
90°
3-5 μm band
135° overall
45°
helicopter
tallpipe
180° 0°
powerturbine
exhaust
plumeheated plume
tallboom
225° 315°
270°
Fig. 2. IR signature variation of gas turbine engine-powered aerospace vehicle: (a) fixed wing aircraft (after [13]) and (b) rotary wing
aircraft Bell UH-1H (after [3]).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
224 S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245
H (km)
aspects, including from the front. Such systems are
IR Signal = 50 μW/m2
inherently immune to commonly used counter-
measures like IR flares that appear as a point 4
source [42]. New generation IR detectors are based
on Quantum Well IR Photodetectors (QWIP) NEI=50 μW/m2
technology. They use multi-colour thermal-imaging 2
systems that employ an array of detectors to build a IR Signal = 200 μW/m2
spatial map of the scene [43–45]. Such detectors can 0
eventually find a place in IR-guided missiles,
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
making IR signature management even more
M
stringent [46,47].
The safe flight envelope of an aircraft against IR
detection depends upon the NEI of the detector; NEI for TFE
hence, it is an important operational constraint With
6 plume IR
[40]. As illustrated in Fig. 3(a), the undetectable
flight zone of aircraft can be predicted on the plot
of altitude H versus flight Mach number MN.
This demarcation on the flight envelope requires NEI for TFE Without
information on the IRSL of aircraft and NEI of 4 plume IR
H (km)
τ
The transmissivity of the atmosphere determines the 0.4
part of IR radiation emitted by the aircraft that
reaches the IR detector and its intensity. There are a 0.2
few bands in the IR spectrum where atmospheric
transmission is high (known as atmospheric win-
0.0
dows); within which, the IR detector must operate. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
The atmosphere also determines the background IR λ (μm)
radiance (noise), thereby determining the contrast
and IRSL of the target. The maximum detection Fig. 4. Atmospheric transmission for mid-latitude summer and
tropics (after [51]).
range of the IR detector depends on its NEI and the
contrast between target aircraft and atmospheric IR
radiance [6]. The spectral distribution of atmospheric The LOWTRAN code and its higher variants are
IR radiance is mainly due to the thermal emission by predominantly used in standard IR signature
atmospheric gases and scattering of sunlight [48]. predictions codes like spectral infrared imaging of
Scattering of radiation by the atmospheric particles is targets and scenes (SPIRITS), Infrared Seeker
prominent only in the visible and near IR bands, Trade-Off Requirements Model (IRSTORM),
and is observed during the daytime; hence, it is MIRSAT, etc. The LOWTRAN code and the
generally neglected [48]. Berger [49] developed a higher-resolution MODTRAN code, take fixed
model for the evaluation of spectral emissivity and number of discrete sea-level air temperatures. In
spectral IR radiance. It was proposed that spectral the LOWTRAN code, the adiabatic lapse rate for
IR radiance is a function of ground level and dew- each of the discrete model atmospheres is not
point temperatures. explicitly defined [52]. Measurable error occurs
whenever the assumed temperature deviates from
3.3.1. Estimation of atmospheric transmission of IR the implicit model atmospheric temperature. This
using LOWTRAN code error is significant while modelling IR signatures
The LOWTRAN code that calculates the atmo- from small, low flying, subsonic targets that are
spheric IR transmissivity and the background IR- dominated by skin heating. Skin heating is deter-
radiance was released in 1972 by the Air Force mined by the speed of the target, sea-level air
Geophysical Laboratory, USA. It is a comprehen- temperature, and the adiabatic lapse rate of the
sive empirical-based program (based on band atmosphere [52]. The model having a sea-level air
models of molecular absorption) with low spectral temperature with the smallest absolute error relative
resolution of 20 cm1, which can be used for to the specified air temperature in model is used [52].
l40.2 mm [50]. It considers spatial and temporal
changes in atmospheric properties, and their effect 3.3.2. Estimation of atmospheric IR-radiance using
on IR transmission. Fig. 4 shows the atmospheric Berger’s model
transmissivity for the 1–20 mm band obtained using Berger’s model is an empirical method based on
the LOWTRAN code, for a vertical path length of direct measurement of clear skies, using surface
5 km, for mid-latitude summer and tropical condi- temperature and humidity. Atmospheric IR-radi-
tions. As seen from Fig. 4, there are several ance can also be derived from the detailed profiles
atmospheric windows, some of which are too of atmospheric constituents, together with knowl-
narrow and insignificant; and 8–14 mm is the widest. edge of their radiative properties [53]. The model
Also, atmospheric transmissivity beyond 14 mm is evaluates spectral emissivity [49,54] and spectral
negligible; hence, cannot be harnessed for aircraft radiance as a function of ground-level temperature
detection [51]. The transmissivity is higher for the and dew-point temperature (which is a function
mid-latitude summer atmosphere than the tropical of humidity). The spectral sky emissivity in wave-
atmosphere, in the 8–14 mm band [51]. length band Dl is obtained by an extension of Beer’s
ARTICLE IN PRESS
226 S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245
Mid-latitude Summer
15° 2
30° -2
5
-6
-10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Zenith=90°
λ (μm)
8-12 μm band, with earth shine the vicinity of the body, and (iv) the wake behind
8 the body [37]. Prediction of IR emissions from a re-
IR Contrast (W/Sr-m2)
8-12 μm band, entry vehicle involves the following [37]: (i) deter-
without earth shine
mination of the whole trajectory and finding
4
variations of altitude, speed, density, and angle of
3-5 μm band, incidence along the trajectory; (ii) determination of
with earth shine
0 shock structure, and boundary layer along the body;
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 and (iii) determination of surface temperatures
3-5 μm band, using combined convection, conduction, and radia-
without earth shine
-4 tion heat transfer model.
Fig. 7. Effect of earthshine on IR contrast in 3–5 and 8–12 mm
bands (after [57]). 4.1. Analysis of powerplant and rear fuselage IR
signature
of temperature-based emission, which increases with The aircraft rear fuselage has a large surface area
emissivity. The emission from the earth is a function at relatively low temperature, which is primarily
of several parameters, e.g. soil type, water body heated by the embedded powerplant and external
(lakes, ocean), vegetation, temperature of soil, aerodynamic heating by the freestream. Earthshine
humidity, etc. [58]. Because models for estimating and skyshine reflections add to IR emissions from
the emissivity of surfaces of the earth are not the rear fuselage, and become especially important
reported, measured values have to be used for in 8–12 mm band for low surface emissivities. The
earthshine calculations [58]. Most surfaces of the engine casing and nozzle act as grey bodies and emit
earth behave as diffuse grey bodies with high radiation in all IR bands, thereby making IR-
emissivity, and Eq. (1) can be used for estimating detection easier. Afterburner flames further enhance
emission from earth’s surfaces. Most agricultural IR emissions from the powerplant [63], due to the
plants have emissivity close to 0.93; therefore, much higher temperatures of chemically reacting
agricultural soil behaves as diffuse radiator with species and the glowing carbon particles.
emissivity close to 0.93 [59]. Mahulikar [64] and Mahulikar et al. [65] devel-
oped a multimode thermal model for predicting the
4. Analysis and modeling of IR signatures rear fuselage skin temperature. Variations in trans-
port and flow properties with temperature, and
The main sources of IRSL in aircraft are: effect of cross-sectional area variation, heat transfer
powerplant, nozzle, exhaust plume, and airframe and skin friction, were also considered [65]. Fig. 8
[40]. Among these, the powerplant is the major shows the rear fuselage skin, jet pipe, and radiation
source of IR emission because of the large amount shield temperature variations along the jet pipe
of heat produced by the gas turbine engine. Plume length, in dry and afterburning modes. The tem-
radiation is visible from all aspects, because of its perature variations in the afterburning mode have
dimensions and orientation [60]. The aircraft been generated in this investigation using the
surfaces radiate predominantly in the 8–14 mm modified thermal model reported in [65]. After-
band, whereas the engine exhaust jet radiates burning significantly increases the rear fuselage skin
strongly in the 2–6 mm band [61]. The IRSL of temperature, as is evident upon comparing tem-
aircraft can be obtained by analytical model peratures in dry mode [Fig. 8(a)] and afterburning
(physics/empirically based) or by experimental mode [Fig. 8(b)]. In the afterburning mode, the
measurements. There are two methods for experi- temperature of the jet pipe almost doubles, while the
mental measurements: static engine testing and rear fuselage skin temperature increases by about
wind tunnel testing. In the former method, the 70 K. Apart from hot combustion products in the
engine is instrumented and set up in an outdoor test powerplant, aerodynamic heating also has a sig-
facility, while the later method employs a scaled nificant effect on the rear fuselage skin temperature.
aircraft model in a wind tunnel [62]. The freestream flow external to the rear fuselage
For a re-entry vehicle, the sources of IR emission skin acts as a heat sink at low MN, when
are as follows: (i) shock heated air in front of body, aerodynamic heating is lower than the heat received
(ii) heated body surface, (iii) ablation products in from the jet-pipe. But at high MN, the freestream
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245 229
Jet pipe
700 1.2
M∞
Aerodynamic heating
600 by free stream
T (K)
1.0
500 Convective cooling
by free stream
Radiation shield 0.8
400 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Rear fuselage skin
H (km)
300
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 Fig. 9. Effect of H and MN on role of freestream in rear fuselage
L (m) skin IRSL (after [65]).
Table 3
1400 Role of H and MN on IRSL of rear fuselage skin
Jet pipe
Role of Role of IR-signature
1000 engine freestream
T (K)
aspect, use of divergent-section is not a prudent wider view angle. Length, diameter, and tempera-
design, though engine performance can be augmented. ture profiles of the plume for a TJE and a TFE are
shown in Fig. 11. The plume size of the TJE is
4.2. Analysis of plume IR signature bigger relative to that of the TFE, resulting in
higher IR emissions from the plume of the TJE as
The aircraft plume mainly consists of gases like compared to the TFE. The emissivity of a gas
H2O (vap.), CO2, CO, and their solid and liquid volume is a function of temperature, pressure,
phases [67]. Amongst these, CO2 is the most molar concentration of gases, and the optical path
important IR-radiation participating species [68]; length. The temperature distribution of a plume
and other gaseous constituents like O2, N2, and from a circular nozzle exit is axisymmetric, which
NOX are insignificant emitters of IR [69]. The IR simplifies prediction of the plume structure. The IR
radiation from the plume is emitted by the vibra- intensity along the centreline of an axisymmetric
tional energy of the gaseous species, and thermal plume remains constant in the potential core region,
energy of solid and liquid species. The plume length because the static temperature and CO2 concentra-
is several times more than the aircraft length; tion do not vary [68].
therefore, plume radiation is visible from a much A simple descriptive model for plume IR radia-
tion estimation is given by Decher [67] and Chu
et al. [70]. A mixed turbofan is analysed for the
effect of length of core, spectral optical depth, and
nozzle size of high aspect ratio nozzles, on IR
signature characteristics [67]. Increasing the aspect
3 ratio reduces the IR emission, e.g. an aspect ratio of
(Ω/l) × 106 Sr/m
2
8 is required to reduce the IR radiation by a factor
of 2 [67]. A simple modelling technique for
1
predicting the detailed flowfield from a 2-D
0 convergent–divergent nozzle plume is presented,
80
and compared with experimental results [70]. The
60
0.0 predicted total temperature contours obtained from
0.5 40
modelling are in good agreement with the experi-
φ°
Fig. 11. Exhaust temperature contours of TJE and TFE (after [6]).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245 231
two categories of IR prediction models: (i) empiri- embedded gas turbine engine and external by
cally based, and (ii) physics based. In the former, IR aerodynamic heating. Therefore, consideration
measurements are obtained on operating aircraft at of exhaust plume orientation is also important
multiple aspects and operating conditions, and the for IRSL prediction from the rear fuselage skin.
data is analyzed to fill the gaps in prediction [13]. In (c) Prediction of IRSL from the engine also
the later, aircraft geometry, surface emissivity, involves several miscellaneous parameters, e.g.
temperature profile, and surface reflections, are engine throttle setting, cooling system, and hot
inputs to the model [13]. Experimental measure- gas streaks [13].
ments of IRSL require an aircraft to be flown over (d) Multiplicity of aircraft, diversity in aircraft
predetermined path and operating conditions, mission planning, and availability of several
determined by H and MN. The majority of research IR-guided missiles, has increased the uncertain-
in IR signatures of aerospace vehicles is undertaken ties in IRSL prediction models.
by military research establishments, relative to
academia. Therefore, there is a scarcity of details 4.5. Lock-on versus lethal envelope and target
in the open literature in both analysis and measure- susceptibility
ment techniques. Investigations using experimental
measurements were very few and mostly made for The lock-on envelope is defined as the locus of
plume IR signature measurements. About 10–12 points around a target where the missile’s IR seeker
standard IRSL prediction models, based on a blend locks-on to the target; it has been used to evaluate
of analysis and experimental measurement techni- target susceptibility. Due to advances in IR
ques were developed worldwide. However, the detectors, missiles are generally constrained by their
underlying physics of these models and their burn-out range; therefore, the lock-on envelope is
prediction efficiency is kept under wrap. Due to inadequate for target susceptibility assessment. The
difficulties in arranging experimental measurements, lock-on envelope does not incorporate several other
standalone analyses methods are preferred; as they important parameters [100]; e.g. target aircraft (Vac)
involve less infrastructure, external dependencies, and missile (Vm) velocities, missile burn-out range,
and cost. Analytical prediction methods are much etc. The lethal envelope [100] is the locus of points
less expensive, but less accurate compared to around the target aircraft, within which, if the
experimental measurements due to uncertainties in missile is launched, there is a high probability of the
input parameters. Validation with experimental missile hitting the target. The lethal envelope is a
measurements and subsequent improvement makes function of target aircraft lock-on envelope, target
analytical models more accurate. Such models are aircraft velocity, missile burn-out range, missile
immensely useful in digital simulators and for the blast-kill radius, etc. Fig. 13(a) shows the 2-D lock-
design of aircraft stealthy with respect to IRSL. on and lethal envelope plots for military aircraft; for
Experimental validation of analytical work has been which, it is assumed that the target aircraft is an
undertaken by standard IRSL prediction model isotropic point source of IR radiation. Therefore,
developers; e.g. NIRATAM, SIRUS, etc. The the lock-on range (RLO) is constant in all aspects;
NIRATAM is validated and developed using field i.e. the lock-on envelope is a perfect circle. The
measurements on Tornado, European F-16, F-4, attacking and target aircraft are assumed to be in
Mirage, and F-104 [92]. the same horizontal plane, and the target aircraft is
The major shortcomings of the analysis methods assumed not to be taking any countermeasures
can be summarized as follows: against the approaching AAM. The variation of
Alethal (area of lethal envelope) with RLO for
(a) Analysis methods/models are inherently inaccu- different (Vac/Vm) is in Fig. 13(b). The curves with
rate due to uncertainties in input parameters, higher (Vac/Vm) have smaller Alethal, due to decrease
unless they are validated by experimental in tracking rate by the missile; i.e. an increase in Vac
measurements. reduces Alethal, making the target aircraft less
(b) Because analysis methods are developed in susceptible.
modules, there can be errors resulting from It is of significance to find the threshold amount
coupling between modules. As an illustration, by which the target’s IRSL should be reduced, to
the aircraft rear fuselage is also heated by the achieve the desired reduction in its susceptibility.
plume, in addition to internal heating by an This enables gauging of the effectiveness of IRSS
ARTICLE IN PRESS
234 S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245
12 90°
Alethal (km)2
Rbo = 10 km
200
12 (km) 12
180° Target 0°
Lethal Aircraft
envelope (Vac/Vm)
Lock-on 5
envelope 100
10
12 270°
0
0 4 8 12 16
RLO (km)
20 400
Rbo = 10km
Vac/Vm = 0.33
Lethal Envelop
16 300
12 200
8 100
IRSLth
4 0
0 100 200 300
IRSL (W/Sr)
Fig. 13. Illustrations of lethal and lock-on envelops, and IRSL for a military aircraft (after [100]): (a) lock-on and lethal envelopes of
target aircraft as isotropic source of IR radiation (RLO ¼ 12 km, Rbo ¼ 10 km); (b) variation of lethal envelope with lock-on range for
different velocity ratios and (c) variation of lethal envelope and lock-on range with aircraft IRSL.
they are more susceptible to IR-guided threats. can be achieved by altering the nozzle/jet pipe
Therefore, IRSS systems were first introduced for geometry, and by fitment of separate devices in
helicopters that must operate in hostile environ- the exhaust system [16,17]. The plume IRSL can
ment. Aircraft/helicopters equipped with IRCMs also be tailored by incorporating and locating a
are not necessarily immune to attacks by IR-guided structure that melts/ablates, resulting in mixing
missiles, as counter–countermeasures (CCM) are of additives into the plume. The structure, which
also being concurrently developed. is subjected to melting/ablation can be made
from materials like magnesium, aluminium,
magnesium-polytetrafluroethylene, carbon, and
5.1. Passive countermeasures other energetic solid particles [35]. The plume
radiant intensity can be enhanced, reduced, or
Reduction in IRSL by passive countermeasures resonated, by varying the additive material
reduces the susceptibility of aircraft by reducing its type, composition, density, and ablation/melting
RLO. Because, RLO / IRSL1=2 (due to the essentially rate [35].
Inverse Square Law dependence), reduction in (iii) Matching of IRSL by modifying the aircraft
IRSL by a factor of 10 reduces RLO by a factor of skin temperature, to reduce contrast with the
about 3.16. surroundings by physical and chemical means.
The general objectives of passive countermeasure This is achieved by emissivity control [30,33],
IRSS systems are as follows: (i) to significantly electric heating of skin [27], liquid evaporative
reduce IRSL from almost all viewing aspects; cooling of surfaces, and heat pipe cooling of
(ii) maintain engine performance by minimizing back- skin [28,29].
pressure penalty; (iii) minimize weight penalty; (iv) Reducing the reflectivity of reflecting aircraft
(iv) minimize cost and system configuration complexity; surfaces to mitigate the sunshine, skyshine, and
(v) minimize external drag; and (vi) while implementing earthshine reflections.
passive IRCMs, other signatures like RCS and acoustic
should not increase as a consequence.
The IRSS system consists of any of the following 5.1.1. Exhaust system
or a combination of the following four techniques/ In 1977, Hughes helicopter introduced the Black
components: Hole Ocarina (BHO) IRSS system for providing full
sphere of protection from heat seeking missiles
(i) Masking of hot engine parts; which includes [106]. The Black Hole system masks the hot engine
nozzle shape alteration [101–104], jet pipe parts, while the Ocarina system of multiple exhausts
geometry modification [3,105], and fitment of dissipates the plume to enhance the mixing process.
new assembly [106,107]. The BHO system has been installed on OH-6,
(ii) Peak temperature reduction of exhaust gases by OH-58, AH-IJ, YAH-64 helicopters and U-21
enhancing mixing with the surroundings. This (turbo-prop) fixed wing aircraft. The installation
ARTICLE IN PRESS
236 S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245
arrangement also avoids the heating of the retrofit device can be detached whenever IR
fuselage and main rotor; and in addition, suppression is not required.
produces a hot spot on ground, which acts as a (x) Hammond and Presz Jr. [26] proposed an
decoy for attack from above. IRSS system having a multistage mixer/
(iii) Wollenweber [18] designed an IRSS in which ejector. At each stage, the hot exhaust gases
the exhaust gas flow channel is attached to a entrain cold air in the core region of the engine
movable access door. This door can be closed exhaust. This multi-stage mixer device also
during combat; and when closed, it masks the masks the hot engine parts, maintains engine
hot flow channel and hot engine parts. performance, and thoroughly diffuses the
(iv) Iya and Roe [19] proposed a system for exhaust gases.
reducing the temperature of the engine by
utilizing the fuel for cooling engine and
exhaust nozzle, prior to feeding to the 5.1.2. Fuselage IRSS
combustor. Fuselage IR radiance consists of emission by
(v) Steyer et al. [20] proposed a system, which uses virtue of its temperature, reflected earthshine, sky-
an elongated duct for carrying the exhaust shine, and sun glint. For a low flying aircraft, even if
gases, which has a baffle to obstruct the the rear fuselage emissivity is made zero, the aircraft
view of hot engine parts. The duct and baffle can still be locked-on by SAM, due to the reflected
are coated with a combination of high and earthshine in 8–12 mm band [57]. In the absence of
low emissivity materials, for reducing IR earthshine, negative contrast with the background
emissions. sky radiance can be used for aircraft detection and
(vi) The device proposed by Mathiasson [21] is lock-on. Matching of fuselage IR emissions with
primarily aimed for stationary plants and those of the background is a high potential
military vehicles or vessels; it entrains fresh technique for IR camouflage. The IRSS systems
air for mixing with the hot gases. The atmo- for fuselage can be grouped in two categories:
spheric cold air and diluted hot air are passed (i) aircraft skin heating/cooling for background
through a screen plate after mixing, which also matching, and (ii) emissivity optimization for
masks the hot parts of the device. reducing IR signature from the fuselage.
(vii) Siefker et al. [23] proposed an exhaust mixer
for gas turbine engines, for reducing the 5.1.2.1. Aircraft skin heating/cooling. Engelhardt
visibility of hot engine parts. A mixer has a [27] has patented a system for electrical heating of
number of lobes, each shaped to partially the upper portion of the fuselage for background
block the engine exhaust; which are curved in matching. The negative IR contrast of the aircraft
a pattern selected to provide a desired degree with respect to the surroundings is minimized,
of blockage. This device enhances the mixing thereby providing IR camouflage when viewed by
with ambient air; but adds to the weight and aircraft flying at higher altitude. However, heating is
complexity, besides loss of thrust. less often applicable; instead, cooling of the aero-
(viii) Papamoschou [24] proposed a device and dynamically heated fuselage skin especially at high
method for mixing enhancement of turbofan Mach numbers, is more important. Cooling of the
exhaust gases with ambient air, thereby redu- skin to a temperature near the ambient air will
cing the plume IR emissions. The system reduce the aircraft detection range by IR imaging
consists of a duct having an outer wall and scanners, the quality often desired for the modern
an inner wall forming a converging–diverging battlefield [114]. Heat pipe cooling [28] and liquid
or converging–diverging–converging passage. evaporative cooling [29] of aircraft skin from inside,
The flow near the first converging area is equal were patented as IRSS systems. Also, heating/
to or greater than the local speed of sound; cooling of surfaces by thermocouples were patented
and thereafter, the flow has a positive stream- as an IRSS system [33]. In such systems, the
wise pressure gradient near the exit. background temperature is sensed and the aircraft
(ix) Chew et al. [25] proposed a baffled device for skin is heated/cooled to the same temperature,
enhancing the mixing of hot exhaust gases resulting in IR camouflage. The skin is heated or
with the ambient, and for masking the hot cooled using a thermoelectric module that converts
engine parts. This baffle module being a electrical energy into a temperature gradient. By
ARTICLE IN PRESS
238 S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245
application of voltage across these modules, one emissivities in the IR spectrum. Surfaces with this
side of the module becomes hot, and the other side layer adopt the colour of the natural background,
becomes cold. The temperature of the adjacent thereby reducing IR contrast and detection. En-
surface can be controlled by varying the applied gelhardt [116] developed the analytical code Effec-
voltage. tive Rapid Airframe Suppression Evaluation
(ERASE) to evaluate the impact of airframe
5.1.2.2. Emissivity optimization. The aircraft IR suppression on lock-on range. The code permits
radiance strongly depends on the emissivity of the assessing the effect of variations in multiple
radiating surface; which depends on surface tem- variables, viz. surface area, temperature, and
perature, and surface physical and chemical proper- emissivity, on lock-on range. This code can also be
ties. Most methods of IR suppression are associated used to perform trade-off analyses associated with
with performance penalties, e.g. increased drag, IRSS systems. It is ideal for performing design
additional weight, increased RCS, and increased trade-off studies considering airframe shaping,
nozzle back pressure. Emissivity optimization of the thermal control systems, and diffuse reflectivity/
aircraft surface is a viable option, which does not emissivity control. The trade-off feature of the code
impose performance penalties. Mahulikar et al. [57] is capable of single, double, or triple variable
studied rear fuselage emissivity optimization in the changes to access the synergism of multiple design
3–5 and 8–12 mm bands. They found that emissivity changes.
reduction from 1.0 to 0.0 reduces peak aircraft
spectral lock-on range by almost 100%, in the 5.1.3. Limitations of IR suppressors
8–12 mm band. In Fig. 16, it is seen that the lock-on Passive IRCMs can be incorporated on an
range is more sensitive to emissivity in 8–12 mm aircraft in the initial design or modification stage,
band, as compared to 3–5 mm band. Emissivity can or later as retrofits/additives. First generation IR
be optimized by physical and chemical treatment of suppressors were simple and aimed to provide
the radiating surfaces. optical blockage of hot engine parts. Second
Friedman’s [115] system uses a movable surface generation IR suppressors involve a combination
structure having predetermined surface character- of optical blockage, metal cooling, and exhaust
istics for emissivity control. DeSteese et al. [34] gas cooling; which add more complexity to the
proposed a system where the physical characteristics system. The major performance penalties associated
of surface, cavities, and plurality of cavities, are with incorporation of IR suppressors are discussed
used to control the emissivity of the surface. below:
Conway et al. [30] proposed a three-colour
camouflage system, consisting of a layer of camou- (a) Additional weight of IR suppressor: The IRSS
flage material having low, intermediate, and high systems prior to BHO included moving parts
like blowers. The BHO does not have moving
10 parts, and is lighter by 180 kg over prior systems
[106]. Most passive IR suppressors for helicop-
8-12 μm
ters (based on optical blocking and mixing of
8
exhaust gases with ambient) [4,117] add to the
weight, as illustrated in Table 4.
6
RLO (km)
Table 4
Weight increase and engine power loss due to IR suppressor installation on helicopter (after [117])
[108]. Power loss due to IR suppressor installa- engine backpressure, weight, and drag penalties of
tion on helicopter is consolidated in Table 4. IRSS systems. An analytical model for evaluating
(c) IRSS systems can require major changes to net effectiveness of IRSS system is essential to
nozzle geometry: High aspect ratio/non-axisym- objectively compare several candidates.
metric nozzles add to the weight, engine back-
pressure, drag, and surface area (for faster 5.2. Active countermeasures
plume dilution), as compared to axisymmetric
nozzles. These countermeasures include IR jammers and
(d) Incorporation of IRSS techniques can increase IR flares, which serve as decoys by luring away the
other signatures: High-speed mixing of free- approaching heat seeking missile. Saturation jam-
stream with jet exhaust increases aural signa- mers introduce large amount of IR noise into the
tures, by increasing the broad-band jet noise. threat’s tracking system that damages the seeker
(e) Incorporation of IRSS techniques increase overall optics [13]. Smart jammers are either non-direc-
complexity of exhaust system: Fabrication of an tional or directional (DIRCM), and deceive IR
enhanced jet mixing system, nozzle, jet-pipe, and trackers by sending false target information [13].
its fitment increases cost and decreases relia- Pyrotechnic IR decoys were developed in the late
bility due to increased complexity. Cost of a US 1950s, i.e. about the same time as the availability of
military program for fitment of countermeasure IR missiles [118]. The IR flares were used first as
suites for helicopters was estimated at $ 1.6 active countermeasures against IR seekers in the
million per helicopter [15]. Vietnam War in the 1960s [119]. These decoys are
(f) IRSS techniques based on emissivity optimization easy to handle, reliable, and are made of cheap
are less complex and do not involve performance constituents like metal fuels and oxidizers. To
penalties, but they require surface alteration: The imitate the tail-pipe IR spectrum, the decoy flares
efficacy of such systems and implementation on fired from the rear against revenge-shot IR missiles
operational aircraft is not yet reported. must radiate strongly in the same band of the IR
spectrum. Busting smoke of bronze–copper-lined
Most penalties associated with IRSS systems can flakes, bronze flakes, and mixture of flakes with
be interpreted as follows: chaff, serve as IR decoys for longer duration [120].
However, the new generation of imaging IR
(i) for the same gas generator speed and fuel flow, detectors can discriminate IR flare (as point source)
the IRSS system reduces the power; and target, making flares ineffective as IRCM. To
(ii) for the same power available for the mission, the counter this situation, decoys driven by liquid fuels
IRSS system results in higher fuel flow, higher that produce as large a radiating plume as that of
gas generator speed, and higher exhaust gas aircraft were proposed. Such decoys use more
temperatures. energetic fuels like tri-ethyl-aluminium, tri-isobu-
tyl-aluminium, di-ethyl-aluminium, etc., which are
In Case (ii), the engine operating point shifts, called as pyrophoric liquids [118]. Air Force
which increases the temperature of the IRSS system, Research Laboratory (AFRL)—USA has devel-
thereby reducing the IR suppression performance. oped a software tool, Advanced IRCM Assessment
Because penalties can increase IR signature level Model (AIRSAM), for IRCM assessment. This tool
and bring down the effectiveness of IRSS system, it is useful for setting condition for flare detection and
is important to keep them as small as possible. But application of techniques for CCM [121].
no information is reported that can provide an Czarnecki [36] proposed an innovative design
estimate of the increase in IR signature level due to consisting of an IR lamp and sacrificial structure, to
ARTICLE IN PRESS
240 S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245
safeguard aircraft from heat seeking missiles. This 6. Summary and conclusions
device provides aircraft vulnerability reduction by
coaxing missiles away from crucial aircraft compo- The potent threat from passively guided infrared
nents to the sacrificial structure that uses an IR (IR) homing missiles is articulated, and the resulting
lamp as decoy [36]. concerns regarding operation in a hostile environ-
Development of a Missile Approach Warning ment are elaborated. Though capabilities of IR
System (MAWS) against IR-guided missiles is a technology were known prior to World War I, the
formidable task. Shoulder Fired Missiles have a initial success of RADAR slowed their development
typical engagement range of 1–8 km, and a flight till 1960. Recent developments in IR sensing
time between 2.7 and 13 s [122]. Therefore, MAWS technology have made it virtually impossible to
must be able to detect, track, and declare a missile in escape IR-detection. Modern IR imaging systems
less than a second; to enable active countermeasures can differentiate small temperature differences, and
to operate. A typical MAWS should ideally have the are immune to conventional countermeasures that
following characteristics: (i) ability to detect the appear as point sources of IR-radiation. Anti-
threat at earliest possible time, i.e. at the time of aircraft missiles with imaging IR detectors are
missile launch; (ii) ability to track the threat under development, and are soon likely to find a
location as it evolves in time, until missile motor place in tactical warfare. Therefore, military forces
burnout and beyond; (iii) ability to detect the threat are demanding more stringent IR counter-measures
from maximum possible launch range; (iv) ability to (IRCMs) from future aircraft/helicopters. Surviva-
detect multiple threats; and (v) high signal-to-noise bility against IR-guided threats has found a place in
ratio for detecting missile in complex natural and the design stage itself, leading to an upsurge of
man-made solar and thermal background [123]. research on several aspects of IR signature predic-
There are three technological options available for tion and management. This review summarizes the
MAWS [119,124]: (i) Pulse Doppler Radar, (ii) IR perspectives that led to various research, design, and
detectors (scanning and staring), and (iii) ultraviolet developmental activities in this field. The most
(UV) detectors. The UV detectors are preferred for important points are:
Helicopter MAWS because background clutter is
minimal in the UV spectrum. Therefore, signal (i) Conventionally, fuselage IR signature was
processing is simpler and a sensor is not required, neglected; however, it is now realized that
which lowers the cost [119]. the rear fuselage is the main source of IR
signature in 8–12 mm band.
5.3. Counter– countermeasures (ii) Earlier, the aircraft plume was generally
considered as the major source of IR radia-
CCMs are currently under development to tion, but research showed that its’ significance
counter the active and passive IRCMs. The CCMs is restricted to the 4.15–4.20 mm band. In
may use new technology that was not envisaged particular, the role of atmospheric transmit-
when the countermeasures were originally devel- tance of IR in determining this relatively low
oped [125]. Some examples of CCM are as follows importance of plume IR radiation is now
[125]: (i) increasingly sensitive IR sensors are under known.
development that can also lock-on to airframe, and (iii) The background IR-radiance plays an impor-
can detect aircraft equipped with IR suppressors; tant role in determining IR signature in the
(ii) imaging seekers, which provide resolution 8–12 mm band. The IR signature due to
sufficient to distinguish the target from ejected and positive contrast decreases and due to negative
towed countermeasures; (iii) high-speed temporal contrast increases, with increasing background
processing to identify the time varying character- IR-radiance. The atmospheric attenuation
istics of the target; (iv) high speed to minimize the reduces IR signature for both, positive and
reaction time available for initiation of counter- negative contrast.
measures; (v) high-altitude flight to avoid detection; (iv) The effect of earthshine on rear fuselage IR
(vi) high manoeuvrability, to minimize the miss emissions in the 8–12 mm band was identified,
distance from countermeasures; (vii) enhanced low and it was shown that earthshine always
observable features, to avoid target detection; (viii) makes IR-detection of the rear fuselage
multiple attack, to overwhelm countermeasures. possible.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245 241
(v) The O-subtended by divergent-nozzle is much not survive the human-made hostile environment, if
larger than that subtended by the convergent- they are deficient in IRCMs.
section and jet-pipe, and is visible over the
complete range of f (01–901). Therefore, 6.1. Scope for future research
considering low IR signature requirement
from the rear aspect, use of divergent-nozzle Most of the research in IR signature analysis is
for aircraft engine is not a prudent design. controlled by military research establishments;
(vi) The nozzle shape can be modified either by— hence, there are limited details in the open academic
(a) notching/corrugating, (b) changing its literature. There is a generic need to develop models
aspect ratio, or (c) by specifically designed with improved IR signature prediction capabilities,
retrofit devices. These modifications enhance followed by experimental validation. The capabil-
the mixing of exhaust gases with ambient air, ities of existing models are far from enabling their
thereby reducing the IR signature level espe- utilization in digital IR simulators for real-time
cially from the rear aspect. evaluation of aircraft susceptibility for decision
(vii) Relative to the ‘lock-on envelope’, the ‘lethal making in combat. Such developments would
envelope’ is a more comprehensive parameter provide a reasonably reliable estimate of the
for target susceptibility assessment. The in- effectiveness of IR flares and IR jammers in
troduction of the lethal envelope led to the operation.
identification of a threshold IR signature level, The specific areas in which there is a pressing need
above which, IR signature reduction has no for future academic research are outlined below:
effect on target susceptibility.
(viii) Minimizing performance penalties associated (i) There is virtually no data in the open literature
with engine backpressure, weight, and drag, on measurements of IR signature levels on
due to incorporation of IR suppression operational aircraft for various operating con-
features is important. These penalties increase ditions and from various angles. Availability of
the IR signature level, because the engine such information would serve as bench-mark
operating point must be shifted to a higher cases for academic codes that study the
temperature for maintaining the output power qualitative characteristics and trends.
required for the mission. (ii) Laboratory simulation for IR signature mea-
(ix) Emissivity alteration/optimization of radiating surement is still under development, as there are
surfaces are effective tools for IR signature issues pertaining to similitude that need to be
suppression, especially because imposed per- resolved. Scaling is an issue considering that IR
formance penalties are minimal. signature level (IRSL) depends on a multitude
(x) Imaging IR seekers have diminished the of parameters that represent several concurrent
effectiveness of IR flares as IRCMs. Direc- mechanisms and phenomena.
tional IR jammers (DIRCM) have emerged as (iii) There is limited information in the literature on
one of the potent active IRCMs. the prediction of IR signature due to miscella-
(xi) The development of a Missile Approach neous sources; e.g. earthshine, sunshine, and
Warning System (MAWS) against IR-guided skyshine. Their modeling is important for
missiles is a formidable task, considering the reducing the uncertainties in IRSL prediction.
dynamics of tactical warfare. (iv) No reported model predicts the effect of IRSS
(xii) The emergence of IR CCM has made IR system installation penalties on increase in
signature management more intricate and IRSL, due to the shift in engine operating
exigent. point for maintaining mission power. This
deficiency necessitates the coupling of IRSL
The IR signatures and associated technologies are prediction models with engine off-design per-
significantly shaping the future course of develop- formance analyses.
ments in stealth technology and electro-optical (EO) (v) For realistic susceptibility assessment, it is
warfare. There is an exigent need to reduce the necessary to predict temperature profiles over
susceptibility of aircraft against IR-guided missiles, the entire aircraft skin for different operating
particularly after the growing attacks on civilian conditions. This would enable modelling of the
aircraft. Modern generation combat aircraft may aircraft as a well-resolved distributed source of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
242 S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245
IR radiation, so that actual lock-on and lethal [11] Aronstein DC, Piccirillo AC. Have Blue and the F-117A:
envelopes can be obtained. evolution of the stealth fighter, second printing. Reston,
(vi) The effectiveness of new IR suppression tech- VA: AIAA Inc.; 1997.
[12] DeMeis R. F-117A First in stealth. Aerospace America,
niques should be gauged based on the final February 1991, p. 32–6.
objective of susceptibility reduction. This ne- [13] Ball RE. The fundamentals of aircraft combat survivability
cessitates estimation of lock-on and lethal analysis and design. 2nd ed. New York: AIAA Education
envelopes with and without IRCM, for operat- Series; 2003.
ing conditions that are typical of human-made [14] Electronic warfare: DOD should select most cost-effective
infrared countermeasures system. US Government report,
hostile environments. GAO/NSIAD-98-2, B276171, April 28, 1998.
[15] Electronic warfare: phased approach to infrared upgrades
would reduce risk to helicopters. US Government report,
Acknowledgements GAO/NSIAD-00-171, B-285362, July 27, 2000.
[16] Frawley RC. IR suppressor. US Patent no. 6122907,
September 26, 2000.
The authors thank the Indian Railways for [17] Lavergne M, Bosqui O, Allemand R. Helicopters equipped
extending full cooperation for this research investi- with jet dilution/deflection means for the combustion gases.
gation, and to CASDE of their Department for the US Patent no. 6123290, September 26, 2000.
logistics. The authors are grateful to Prof. Yu [18] Wollenweber GC. Method and apparatus for exhausting
Yanwen, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, PR Chi- gases from gas turbine engines. US Patent no. 6971240 B2,
December 6, 2005.
na, for making available the copy of research paper [19] Iya SK, Roe GM. System and method for controlling the
no. [96]. The authors thank the A. von Humboldt temperature and infrared signature of an engine. US Patent
Foundation, Germany, for the rich exposure to no. 7013636 B2, March 21, 2006.
research methodology. [20] Steyer W, Kieffer C.M., Jasany J.M., Hoffman J. Method
and apparatus for suppressing infrared signatures. US
Patent no. 6988674 B2, January 6, 2006.
[21] Mathiasson U. Device for reducing the signature of hot
References exhausting gases. US Patent no. 6937181 B2, August 30,
2005.
[1] Hunter TB. The proliferation of MANPADS. Jane’s [22] Gustafsson T, Olsson O. Exhaust discharge system with
Intelligence Review 2002; 28 November /www.janes.com/ low IR signature. US Patent no. 6385968 B1, May 14, 2002.
security/international_security/news//jir021128_1_n.shtmlS. [23] Siefker RG, Baily RV, Baker VD, Khalid SA, Loebig JC.
[2] The MANPADS menace: combating the threat to global Exhaust mixer and apparatus using same. US Patent no.
aviation from man-portable air defence systems. Bureau of 6606854 B1, August 19, 2003.
Political-Military Affairs and Bureau of International [24] Papamoschou D. Mixing enhancement using axial flow. US
Security and Non-Proliferation, Washington, DC, Septem- Patent no. 6666016 B2, December 23, 2003.
ber 20, 2005. /www.state.gov/t/pm/rls/fs/53558.htmS. [25] Chew T, Moore CC, Harrold MC. Removable baffle
[3] Thompson J, Birk AM, Cunningham M. Design of infrared infrared suppressor. US Patent no. 6253540 B1, July 3,
signature suppressor for the Bell 205 (UH-1H) helicopters, 2001.
Part I: aerothermal design. In: Seventh CASI propulsion [26] Hammond MH, Presz Jr WM. Multi-stage mixer/ejector
symposium, 1999. for suppressing infrared radiation. US Patent no. 6016651,
[4] Helicopter infrared signature suppression system. A report January 25, 2000.
by W.R. Davis Engineering Ltd., Ottawa, Ontario, January [27] Engelhardt M. Apparatus and method for electrical heating
1993. of aircraft skin for background matching. US Patent no.
[5] Beveridge D. APEC nations agree to limit missile sales. 4801113, January 31, 1989.
Associated Press 2003; 18 October. /www.fas.org/asmp/ [28] Engelhardt M. Heat pipe cooling of aircraft skin for
campaigns/MANPADS/MANPADS.html#fn1_tgtS. infrared radiation matching. US Patent no. 6435454 B1,
[6] Hudson Jr RD. Infrared system engineering. 1st ed. New August 20, 2002.
York: Wiley; 1969. [29] Miller RC, Seemann RJ. Infrared signature reduction of
[7] Waldman G, Wootton J. Electro-optical systems perfor- aerodynamic surfaces. US Patent no. 4991797, February
mance modelling. 1st ed. Boston: Artech House; 1993. 12, 1991.
[8] Kuhn DM. Attack highlights increasing MANPADS [30] Conway TG, McClean RG, Walker GW. Three color
threat. Jane’s Intelligence Review 2003: 15(2). infrared camouflage system. US Patent no. 5077101,
[9] Rao GA, Mahulikar SP. Integrated review of stealth December 31, 1991.
technology and its role in airpower. Aeronaut J 2002; [31] Stevens WC, Sturm EA. Infrared radiation-interaction
106(1066):629–41. article and method of generating a transient infrared
[10] Ball RE, Atkinson DB. A history of the survivability design signature response. US Patent no. 5571621, November 5,
of military aircraft. In: Lawless LTC JN Jr, editor. 1995 1996.
JTCG/AS air combat survivability symposium, Summer [32] Leupolz A, Scherber W, Rothmund W. Infrared camou-
1995, p. 75–89. flage device. US Patent no. 6613420 B1, September 2, 2003.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245 243
[33] Reynolds RF, Kinsell MJ. Thermal and visual camouflage [50] Kneizys F.X., Shettle E.P., Abreu L.W., Chetwynd J.H,
system. US Patent no. 6338292 B1, January 15, 2002. Anderson G.P. Lowtran-7 computer code user’s manual.
[34] DeSteese JG, Antoniak ZI, White M, Peters TJ. Structure Air Force Geophysics Laboratory Hanscom AFB MA,
and method for controlling the thermal emissivity of a AFGL-TR-88-0177, 1988.
radiating object. US Patent no. 6713774 B2, March 30, [51] Rao GA, Mahulikar SP. Effect of atmospheric transmis-
2004. sion and radiance on aircraft infrared signatures. J Aircraft
[35] Vickery CA, Mason JN, Kruse WD, Olmos M. Rocket 2005;42(4):1046–54.
exhaust plume signature tailoring. US Patent no. 6684622 [52] McGlynn JD, Auerbach SP. IR signature prediction errors
B2, February 3, 2004. for skin-heated aerial targets. In: Proceedings of SPIE—
[36] Czarnecki GJ. Aircraft missile-hit survivability using The International Society for Optical Engineering, Targets
infrared lamp and sacrificial support structure. US Patent and backgrounds: characterization and representation—
no. 6267039 B1, July 31, 2001. III, vol. 3062. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1997.
[37] Beier K. Infrared radiation model for aircraft and re-entry p. 22–30.
vehicle. In: Proceedings of SPIE—The International [53] Berdahl P, Fromberg R. The thermal radiance of clear
Society for Optical Engineering: infrared technology— skies. Solar Energy 1982;29(4):299–314.
XIV, vol. 972. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE (Society [54] Berger X, Bathiebo J. From spectral clear sky emissivity to
of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers); 1988. total clear sky emissivity. Solar Wind Technol 1989;6(5):
p. 363–74. 551–6.
[38] Burch DE, Gryvnak DA. Laboratory measurement of the [55] Bliss RW. Atmospheric radiation near the surface of the
infrared absorption by H2O and CO2 in regions of weak ground: a summary for engineers. Solar Energy 1961;5:
absorption. In: Proceedings of SPIE—The International 103–20.
Society for Optical Engineering: optical properties of the [56] Bell EE, Eisner L, Young J, Oetjen RA. Spectral radiance
atmosphere, vol. 142. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1978. of sky and terrain at wavelengths between 1 and 20 mm II.
p. 16–24. Sky measurements. J Opt Soc Am 1960;50(12):1313–20.
[39] Regelson E. Impact of IR devices on aircraft design trends. [57] Mahulikar SP, Rao GA, Kolhe PS. Infrared signatures of
Astronaut Aeronaut 1967;5:60–4. low-flying aircraft and their rear fuselage skin’s emissivity
[40] Mahulikar SP, Sane SK, Gaitonde UN, Marathe AG. optimization. J Aircraft 2006;43(1):226–32.
Numerical studies of infrared signature levels of complete [58] Jacobs P. Review of the technology and research in the area
aircraft. Aeronaut J 2001;105(1046):185–92. of infrared signature of targets and backgrounds. In:
[41] Sizov FF. Infrared detectors: outlook and means. Semi- Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for
cond Phys Quant Electron Optoelectron 2000;3(1):52–8. Optical Engineering: characterization, propagation, and
[42] Sully PR, VanDam D, Bird J, Luisi D. Development of a simulation of infrared scenes, vol. 1311. Bellingham, WA,
tactical helicopter infrared signature suppression (IRSS) USA: SPIE; 1990. p. 80–94.
system. In: Proceedings of AGARD-FVP conference, 9605- [59] Hipps LE. The infrared emissivities of soil and Artemisia
4-001. Paper no. 12, 1996. tridentata and subsequent temperature corrections in a
[43] Choi KK. QWIP technology: advances and prospects. In: shrub-steppe ecosystem. Remote Sensing Environ
Blood P, Osinski M, Arakawa Y, editors. Proceedings of 1989;27(3):337–42.
SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering: [60] Foster WD, Register HI. Collection and simulation of
physics and simulation of optoelectronic devices—X, vol. spatial infrared signatures of military jet aircraft. AIAA
4646. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 2002. p. 79–93. paper no. 1981-2494. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA Inc.; 1981.
[44] Choi KK. Corrugated quantum well infrared photodetec- [61] Heragu SS, Rao KVL, Raghunandan BN. Generalized
tors and arrays. Int J High Speed Electron Systems model for infrared perception from an engine exhaust.
2002;12(3):715–59. J Thermophys Heat Transfer 2002;16(1):68–76.
[45] Chen CJ, Choi KK, Chang WH, Tsui DC. Two-color [62] Varney GE. Infrared signature measurement techniques
corrugated quantum-well infrared photodetector for and simulation methods for aircraft survivability. AIAA
remote temperature sensing. Appl Phys Lett 1998;72(1): paper no. AIAA-79-1186. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA Inc.;
7–9. 1979.
[46] Bell WA, Glasgow BB. Impact of advances in imaging [63] Howe D. Introduction to the basic technology of stealth
infrared detectors on anti-aircraft missile performance. In: aircraft: Part 1—basic considerations and aircraft self
Holst GC, editor. Proceedings of SPIE—The International emitted signals (passive considerations). ASME J Eng
Society for Optical Engineering, Infrared imaging systems: Gas Turbines Power 1991;113(75):75–9.
design, analysis, modelling, and testing—X, vol. 3701. [64] Mahulikar SP. Prediction of engine casing temperature of
Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1999. p. 244–53. fighter aircraft for infrared signature studies. In: Proceed-
[47] Glasgow BB, Bell WA. Future of anti-aircraft imaging ings of SAE’s aerospace Atlantic conference, SAE paper
infrared seeker missile threats. In: IEEE proceedings of no. 920961. Warrendale, PA, USA: SAE Inc.; 1992. p.
aerospace applications conference (Cat. no.99TH8403), 1–10.
vol. 4. Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE; 1999. p. 457–65. [65] Mahulikar SP, Kolhe PS, Rao GA. Skin temperature
[48] Eisner L, Bell EE, Young J, Oetjen RA. Spectral radiance prediction of aircraft rear fuselage with multi-mode
of sky and terrain at wavelengths between 1 and 20 mm III. thermal model. J Thermophys Heat Transfer 2005;19(1):
Terrain measurements. J Opt Soc Am 1962;52(2):201–9. 114–24.
[49] Berger XA. Simple model for computing the spectral [66] Mahulikar SP, Potnuru SK, Kolhe PS. Analytical estima-
radiance of clear skies. Solar Energy 1988;40(4):321–33. tion of solid angle subtended by complex well-resolved
ARTICLE IN PRESS
244 S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245
surfaces for infrared detection studies. Appl Opt [84] Victor AC. Calculations of rocket plume afterburning
2007;46(22):4991–8. coupled to reacting base recirculation regions. J Spacecraft
[67] Decher R. Infrared emissions from turbofans with high Rockets 1977;14(9):534–8.
aspect ratio nozzles. J Aircraft 1981;18(12):1025–31. [85] Miller E. Prediction of the visible signature of solid rocket
[68] Krishnamoorthy V, Pai BR. Aerothermodynamics and plumes. J Spacecraft Rockets 1990;27(1):82–4.
infrared emission characteristics of simulated aeroengine jet [86] Ajdari E, Gutmark E, Parr TP, Wilson KJ, Schadow KC.
plumes. Report by National Aerospace Laboratories, Thermal imaging of afterburning plumes. J Propulsion
Bangalore, India. Document no. PD PR 9113, July 1991. Power 1991;7(6):873–8.
[69] Lefebvre AH. Flame radiation in gas turbine combustion [87] Nelson HF. Influence of scattering on infrared signa-
chambers. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1984;27(9):1493–510. tures of rocket plumes. J Spacecraft Rockets 1984;21(5):
[70] Chu CW, Der J, Wun W. Simple two-dimensional nozzle 508–10.
plume model for infrared analysis. J Aircraft 1981;18(12): [88] Avital G, Cohen Y, Gamss L, Kanelbaum Y, Macales J,
1038–43. Trieman B, et al. Experimental and computational study of
[71] Heragu SS, Rao KVL. Prediction of radiative transfer from infrared emission from underexpanded rocket exhaust
potential core of a hot jet. J Thermophys Heat Transfer plumes. J Thermophys Heat Transfer 2001;15(1-4):377–83.
1994;8(2):368–70. [89] Vaitekunas DA, Fraedrich DS. Validation of the NATO-
[72] Nelson HF, Tucker EO. Infrared emission from the engine standard ship signature model (SHIPIR). In: Proceedings
exhaust plumes. AIAA paper no. AIAA-1986-465. Reston, of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineer-
VA, USA: AIAA Inc.; 1986. p. 8. ing, Targets and backgrounds: characterization and repre-
[73] Bakker E.J, Fair M.L., Schleijpen H.M.A. Modelling multi sentation—V, vol. 3699. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE;
spectral imagery data with NIRATAM v3.1 and NPLUME 1999. p. 103–13.
v1.6. In: Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society [90] Sanders JS, Johnson KR, Curran AR, Rynes PL. Ground
for Optical Engineering, Targets and backgrounds: char- target infrared signature modeling with the Multi-Service
acterization and representation—V, vol. 3699. Bellingham, Electro-optic Signature (MuSES) code. In: Proceedings of
WA, USA: SPIE; 1999. p. 80–91. SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering,
[74] Ibgui L, Hartmann JM. An optimized line by line code for Targets and backgrounds—vi: characterization, visualiza-
plume signature calculations—I: model and data. J Quant tion, and the detection process, vol. 4029. Bellingham, WA,
Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2002;75(3):273–95. USA: SPIE; 2000. p. 197–204.
[75] Ibgui L, Valentin A, Merienne MF, Jenouvrier A, Lux JP, Le [91] Gonda T.G., Gerhart G.R. High-resolution infrared
Doucen R, et al. An optimized line-by-line code for plume signature modelling: a US army perspective. In: Proceed-
signature calculations, II: comparisons with measurements. ings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical
J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 2002;74(4):401–15. Engineering, Infrared detectors and focal plane arrays—
[76] Soufiani A, Taine J. High temperature gas radiative II, vol. 1685. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1992. p.
property parameters of statistical narrow-band model for 92–102.
H2O, CO2 and CO, and correlated-K model for H2O and [92] Noah MA, Kristl J, Schroeder JW, Sandford, BP.
CO2. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 1997;40(4):987–91. NIRATAM-NATO Infrared Air Target Model. In: Pro-
[77] Hewitt CR, Black WZ. Effect of line Doppler shift on ceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical
plume infrared signatures. J Thermophys Heat Transfer Engineering: surveillance technologies, vol. 1479. Belling-
1995;9(4):636–43. ham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1991. p. 275–82.
[78] Rao GA, Mahulikar SP. Aircraft powerplant and plume [93] Bishop GJ, Caola M.J, Geatches RM, Roberts NC. SIRUS
infrared signature modelling and analysis. In: Meeting spectral signature analysis code. In: Proceedings of SPIE—
papers of 43rd AIAA Aerospace sciences meeting and The International Society for Optical Engineering, Targets
exhibits. AIAA paper no. AIAA-2005-0221. Reston, VA, and backgrounds—IX: characterization and representa-
USA: AIAA Inc.; 2005. p. 1397–407. tion, vol. 5075. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 2003.
[79] Mahulikar SP, Rao GA, Sane SK, Marathe AG. Aircraft p. 259–69.
plume infrared signature in nonafterburning mode. [94] Iannarilli Jr FJ, Wohlers MR. End-to-end scenario-
J Thermophys Heat Transfer 2005;19(3):413–5. generating model for IRST performance analysis. In:
[80] Cogliandro S, Castelli P. Plume infrared signature mea- Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for
surements and comparison with a theoretical model. In: Optical Engineering: signal and data processing of small
Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for targets, vol. 1481. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1991.
Optical Engineering: infrared technology—XII, vol. 658. p. 187–97.
Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1986. p. 73–9. [95] DiMarco JS. Closed loop modelling of imaging infrared
[81] Ludwig CB, Klier AM, Malkmus W, Adams M, Newby, H. missiles. Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society
Infrared radiation from rocket plumes. In: Proceedings of for Optical Engineering, Targets and backgrounds: char-
SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering: acterization and representation—IV, vol. 3375. Bellingham,
infrared technology—XVI, vol. 1341. Bellingham, WA, WA, USA: SPIE; 1998. p. 221–9.
USA: SPIE; 1990. p. 410–22. [96] Yu Y, Liu Y. Generation of realistic infrared image for
[82] Nelson HF. Evaluation of rocket plume signature uncer- moving objects. Int J Infrared Millimeter Waves 2004;
tainties. J Spacecraft Rockets 1987;24(6):546–51. 25(7):1087–97.
[83] Nelson HF. Influence of particulates on infrared emission [97] Yu W, Tu H, Wang Z, Wang Y, Peng Q. An infrared image
from tactical rocket exhausts. J Spacecraft Rockets 1984; synthesis model for high-speed targets. Int J Infrared
21(5):425–32. Millimeter Waves 2002;23(12):1743–51.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S.P. Mahulikar et al. / Progress in Aerospace Sciences 43 (2007) 218–245 245
[98] Sundberg RL, Gruninger J, Nosek M, Burks J, Fontaine E. breathing engines, Cleveland, Ohio. Paper no. AIAA &
Quick image display (QUID) model for rapid real-time ISABE-2003-1093. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA Inc.; 2003.
imagery and spectral signatures. Proceedings of SPIE—The [111] Lamb M, Taylor JG, Frassinelli MC. Static internal
International Society for Optical Engineering, SPIE tech- performance of a two-dimensional convergent–divergent
nologies for synthetic environments: hardware-in-the-loop nozzle with external shelf. NASA Technical Memorandum
testing, ii—proceedings, vol. 3084. Bellingham, WA, USA: 4719, Langley Research Centre, September 1996.
SPIE; 1997. p. 272–81. [112] Dix J, Saddington AJ, Knowles K, Richardson MA. Infra-
[99] Bell W.A., Glasgow B.B. On the next generation of imaging red signature reduction study on a small-scale jet engine.
infrared seekers for anti-aircraft missiles. In: Proceedings of Aeronaut J 2005;109(1092):83–8.
SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, [113] Seiner JM, Ukeiley LS, Jansen BJ, Kannepalli, C, Dash, S.
Infrared imaging systems: design, analysis, modeling, and Noise reduction technology for F/A-18 E/F aircraft. In:
testing—IX, vol. 3377. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1998. Collection of technical papers—10th AIAA/CEAS aero-
p. 220–30. acoustics conference, vol. 3. AIAA paper no. 2004-2972,
[100] Rao GA, Mahulikar SP. New criterion for aircraft 2004, p. 1938–50.
susceptibility to infrared homing missiles. Aerospace Sci [114] Pruyn RR, Windolph GW. Survivability tradeoff consid-
Technol 2005;9(8):701–12. erations for future military observation helicopters. J Am
[101] Wu C, Farokhi S, Taghavi R. Computational study of Helicopter Soc 1979;24(2):4–9.
advanced exhaust system transition ducts with experimen- [115] Friedman MH. Passive control of emissivity, colour and
tal validation. J Propulsion Power 1993;9(3):437–42. camouflage. US Patent no. 5734495, March 31, 1998.
[102] Banken G.J., Cornette W.M., Gleason K.M., Keith M. [116] Engelhardt M. Effective rapid airframe suppression evalua-
Investigation of infrared characteristics of three generic tion (ERASE). In: Proceedings of the SPIE—The Interna-
nozzle concepts. In: Proceedings of AIAA/SAE/ASME tional Society for Optical Engineering, Infrared imaging
16th joint propulsion conference, AIAA paper no. 80–1160. systems: design, analysis, modeling, and testing—IV, vol.
Reston, VA, USA: AIAA Inc.; 1980. p. 11. 1969. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE; 1993. p. 128–38.
[103] Capone FJ, Gowadia NS, Wooten WH. Performance [117] W.R. Davis Engineering Ltd., Ottawa, Canada; Newsletter,
characteristics of nonaxisymmetric nozzles installed on an April 2005, issue 12.
F-18 propulsion model. J Aircraft 1980;17(6):387–92. [118] Koch EC. Review on pyrotechnic aerial infrared decoys.
[104] Miller E, Protopapas J. Nozzle design and integration in an Propellants Explosives Pyrotech 2001;26(1):3–11.
advanced supersonic fighter. AIAA paper no. AIAA-79- [119] Heikell J. Electronic warfare self-protection of battlefield
1813. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA Inc.; 1979. helicopters: a holistic view. PhD thesis, Helsinki University
[105] Singh VP, Mahulikar SP, Raja AT. Infrared signature of Technology, Finland, March 2005.
suppression system for marine gas turbine exhaust. J Mar [120] Singh A, Avachat SG, Joshi SA, Singh H. Evaluation of
Eng 1995;33:42–7. pyrotechnic smoke for anti-infrared and anti-laser roles.
[106] Barlow B, Petach A. Advanced design of infrared Propellants Explosives Pyrotech 1995;20(1):16.
suppressor for turboshaft engines, In: Proceedings of 33rd [121] Cohen R, Forrai D, Maier J. Tool for infrared counter-
annual national forum of the American Helicopter Society, measures assessment. In: IEEE Proceedings of national
Washington, DC, Paper no. 77, 1977. aerospace and electronics conference NAECON, 2000, p.
[107] Birk AM, VanDam D. Infrared signature suppression for 110–7.
marine gas turbines: Comparison of sea trial and model test [122] Montgomery JB, Sanderson RB, Baxley FO. A tactical
results for the DRES Ball IRSS system. J Eng Gas Turbine mid-infrared testbed. In: Proceedings of SPIE—The Inter-
Power 1994;116(1):75–81. national Society for Optical Engineering, Targets and
[108] Thompson J., Gubbels A.W, Barry B., Birk A.M. Design of backgrounds—VI: characterization, visualization, and the
an infrared signature suppression for the Bell 205 (UH-1H) detection process, vol. 4029. Bellingham, WA, USA: SPIE;
helicopter, Part-II: engine & flight testing. In: Proceedings 2002. p. 93–101.
of 11th CASI aerodynamics symposium, 2001. [123] Peli T, Monsen P, Stahl R, Pauli M, McCamey K. Signal
[109] Wang J, Gao J, Wang W, Wang J, Xie J. Aircraft plume processing improvements for infrared missile warning
signature suppression and stealth. Proceedings of SPIE— sensors. In: IEEE Proceedings of national aerospace and
The International Society for Optical Engineering, Infrared electronics conference NAECON, vol. 2, 1997, p. 1052–64.
components and their applications, vol. 5640. Bellingham, [124] Sanderson RB. Infrared missile warning sensors. In: IEEE
WA, USA: SPIE; 2005. p. 579–86. Proceedings of national aerospace and electronics con-
[110] Wallin M, Gronstedt T, Hall U. A study of engine ference NAECON, vol. 2, 1996, p. 777–81.
configurations for a low-signature reconnaissance UAV. [125] Fleeman EL. Tactical missile design. 2nd ed. New York:
In: Proceedings of XVI international symposium on air AIAA Education Series; 2006.