Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Primary Credit Analysts: Trevor J D'Olier-Lees, New York (1) 212-438-7985; trevor.dolier-lees@standardandpoors.com Winston W Chang, New York (1) 212-438-8123; winston.chang@standardandpoors.com Steven J Dreyer, Washington D.C. (1) 202-383-2487; steven.dreyer@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contacts: Hiroki Shibata, Tokyo (81) 3-4550-8437; hiroki.shibata@standardandpoors.com Michael Wilkins, London (44) 20-7176-3528; mike.wilkins@standardandpoors.com Jeong-A Kim, New York (1) 212-438-1211; jeonga.kim@standardandpoors.com Research Contributor: Stephen Coscia, New York (1) 212-438-3183; stephen.coscia@standardandpoors.com
Table Of Contents
Competitiveness Of Solar Power Versus Other Types of Electrical Power Generation Capital Markets Now Open For Utility Scale Projects Japanese Solar Boom Europe Still Has A Gleam For Solar Efficient Capital Market Financing For Distributed Solar Generation Is A Tough Nut To Crack Let The Sunshine In Related Criteria And Research
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
When someone flicks a switch and turns on a light powered by solar, it's only the end of a long process that included planning, financing, manufacturing, siting, construction, and transmission of that power. Solar power can be generated from large arrays of PV cells that collect sunlight, sometimes from millions of panels on "solar farms," convert it to electricity, and send it to local utilities. Or, more directly, it can be generated from solar panels installed on-site at individual homes and businesses. The former is called utility-scale power, and the latter is distributed generation. Although there were more utility-scale than residential or commercial installations in 2012 (see chart 1), Standard & Poor's Ratings Services sees further growth in all segments of the solar power industry, and we expect distributed solar to become more common as financing for it becomes standardized and routine.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 1
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 2
By comparison, costs for a conventional coal-burning plant and a combined-cycle natural-gas-fired plant run $100.10 and $67.10, respectively (see table 2). Similar cost differentials exist in the rest of the world. The higher cost of solar power explains why even though it's desirable from an environmental point of view, it's likely to need some form of subsidy until costs reach parity with conventional power sources at the wholesale level. These U.S. government estimates, however, don't include the possibility of lower total costs that result from targeted domestic tax credits. New solar plants that come on line before the end of 2016, for instance, are eligible for a 30% investment tax credit on capital spending. Whereas, solar projects that come on line after that are eligible for a 10% tax credit. Nor do those estimates reflect any changes that might occur in the relatively low current price of natural gas, now the fuel of choice in the U.S. for new utility scale electric power. Material changes in the cost of any conventional fuel could help or dampen prospects for more solar power growth. Solar power costs do have a bright side, and that's the fall in prices of PV material resulting from increased production (principally in China) and oversupply. That price decline was apparent in 2012, when the price of polysilicon, the principal raw material for most solar PV cells, declined 37% to $19.88 per kilo in the last quarter of that year, from $31.62 per kilo in the first, according to GTM/SEIA (see chart 3). The cells and wafers made of this material also showed similar price declines (see chart 3).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 3
The reduction in PV system installed and related costs, such as customer acquisition and financing has led to a reduction in stalled prices (see chart 4).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 4
We believe that PV system installed and related costs, such as customer acquisition and financing, and system component costs will continue to fall leading to the greater penetration of solar generation. However, given the capital intensive nature of the industry a challenge to future growth is the need for long term efficient capital.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
have assigned in this sector. In parts of Europe, utility-scale solar projects benefit similarly from feed-in tariffs (FIT), where regulated utilities buy renewable energy at a government-set price. FITs and PPAs reduce the financial risk for solar producers and help make their projects viable.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 5
Efficient Capital Market Financing For Distributed Solar Generation Is A Tough Nut To Crack
Distributed solar power has proven popular in many regions of the world, but understanding and structuring its financing is more difficult. In the U.S., capital for distributed generation is scarce and largely limited to major players. Like financing a single large power project--a dam, a gas-fired power plant, or a utility-scale solar PV sun farm--financing distributed solar generation assets can be complex and the due diligence for each asset time consuming. Until very recently the funding of distributed generation came from high net worth individuals, tax equity players and banks' lending typically on a project finance pool basis. With the advent of the SolarCity LMC Series I LLC financing, momentum towards efficient financing is building. Financing thousands of panels on homes or bundling multiple commercial and industrial installations in one transaction can benefit from pooling in a project financing or through securitization. Either, in our view, can potentially deliver the scale, structure, and homogeneity that investors seek. Further efforts continue to support the path to efficient financing. This includes industry groups such as the Solar
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Access to Public Capital (SAPC) working group, led by National Renewable Energy Laboratory and truSolar. SAPC is striving to create more homogeneity among contracts and data; truSolar is seeking to create standards in credit risk measurement. Another major issue associated with utility-scale and distributed solar generation is simply the quality of the manufacture of the panels and other components and the quality of their installation and maintenance. Given these are expected to be long-term operating assets, lower standards of quality can lead to reduced power generation and commensurate cash flows to support financings. So this is a factor in our credit analysis of both solar project financings and securitization. Efforts are under way to improve quality through standardization and other risk mitigation techniques such as quality assurance programs at factories, quality testing, and insurance. "The ultimate challenge for the industry is to standardize," said Lars Norell, a managing partner at Altus Power Management, speaking at the International Project Finance Association's Sept. 18, 2013, conference, "Distributed Solar: Key Credit Concerns and Financing Options," hosted by Standard & Poor's. Federal and state governments are also keen to support the path to efficient financing. For example, New York State recently launched a billion-dollar "green bank." Speaking at the conference, Richard Kaufman, chairman of energy and finance for the state, explained that the "green bank can help in accelerating the evolution of solar financing to capital markets." But the industry is still young and how these different financing mechanisms and mitigants will ultimately play out remains to be seen. Net metering has caused tension between the PV developer industry and the utilities. From the consumers' perspective, the current net metering regime creates an economic incentive to install a PV system. This is more so for residential customers than for commercial entities because they have different consumption profiles. Given that the average residential consumer uses more electricity in the evening when the PV system generation is low to zero and the majority of the day's generation would be exported to the grid at the retail rate, this credit generally reduces the consumer's monthly bill.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Copyright 2014 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT