Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 1 of 91
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
*
EDWARD PATRICK, Plaintiff,
VS.
Deposition of THOMAS DILLING, Witness herein, called by the Plaintiff for cross-examination pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure, taken before me, Melissa A.
Neary, a Notary Public and Registered
Professional Reporter in and for the State of Ohio, at the offices of Ohio State Board of
Nursing, 17 South High Street, Suite 400,
Case I :05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 2 of 91
INDEX
PAGE
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 3 of 91
Page 3
1 APPEARANCES :
2
3
Blankenship
N. Jeffrey Blankenship Attorney at Law 7711 Ewing Boulevard, Suite 100 P.O. Box 1 5 7 Florence, Kentucky 41022-0157
and Robbins, Kelly, Patterson Randy J. Blankenship Attorney at Law 7 West Seventh Street Suite 1400 Cincinnati, Ohio On behalf of the Defendants: Walter
&
&
Tucker
Haverfield
Kenneth Zirm Attorney at Law The Tower at Erieview 1301 East Ninth Street, Suite 3500 Cleveland, Ohio 44114 On behalf of Thomas Dilling: Ohio Attorney General's Office Barbara J. Pfeiffer Attorney at Law 30 East Broad Street 26th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215
Case I :05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 4 of 91
THOMAS DILLING
4 of lawful age, Witness herein, having been 5 first duly cautioned and sworn, as hereinafter
6 certified, was examined and said as follows:
CROSS-EXAMINATION
8 BY MR. N.J. BLANKENSHIP:
9
My name is Barbara
22
Case I :05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 5 of 91
Page 5
1 I made a copy for each counsel.
I appreciate
In part,
Information received by
I
I1
1
17 Board.
22 going.
25 we will do so.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 6 of 91
Page 6
3 sit back and listen. Mr. Dilling, you told us your name. 5 Would you please tell us your title?
6
A.
11 different position?
12
A.
Yes.
What was your position in October of
Q.
A.
Okay.
Case I :05-cv-02791-LW
*
m
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 7 of 91
Page 7
1
3 about a particular health care provider who was 4 under your licensure, it would be your job to
5 turn that over for investigation?
-4
1:
i
I
;
+
1
I
1 0 school?
11
High school is fine. A. Because we were just talking about I went to Cleveland
1
12
13 it.
I graduated in
II I
Okay.
Case I :05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 8 of 91
2
3
A.
Yes. Okay.
Yes.
Q.
We are here because you were quoted I'm going to be asking you
9 in that article.
I am more than
15
A.
17 nature.
Is that okay?
That's okay.
20
Q.
21 let me know.
Okay.
I need to ask if you have spoken with
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 9 of 91
Page 9
1 certain people relative to either this article
i' 1;
1.
PFEIFFER:
10 testify to.
Well, first of all, I'm just asking the question, have you ever spoken to him, I 12 13 first? Have you ever spoken to Peter Heimlich? MS. PFEIFFER: I'd like to consult.
THE WITNESS:
Sure.
I appreciate the
20 can't answer that based on -Q Just for the record, then, any 21 22 conversations such as what I asked about, you
If you're getting at
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 10 of 91
Page 10
1 any investigative matters.
2
1'
I-
Okay.
MS. PFEIFFER:
MR. N . J. BLANKENSHI P:
MS. PFEIFFER:
I understand.
Thank you.
A.
19
A.
Yes.
Okay. That wasn't in connection with
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 11 of 91
Page 11 1 complaint, in which I would have given him 2 similar answers to what I'm giving you today in 3 terms of confidentiality. 4 Q. So you would have told him that you
A.
9 he wrote, which is previously marked as Exhibit 10 38 in this case, so I'm not going to mark it 11 again.
MS. PFEIFFER:
A.
19 once or twice, kind of scanned the whole thing, 20 and I guess I'm familiar with what I think is
21 just one time that I'm indirectly quoted, quote
22 marks around something that was attributed to
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 12 of 91
1 investigations.
A.
Okay.
! ;
17 fact, make? Well, yes, I believe so. Tell us what that is. Yeah. I want to -- there is a
-!.t
1:
1
i.
I
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 13 of 91
5 and saying, you know, in terms of "Dilling 6 never questioned," that wasn't me speaking to 7 Francis, necessarily.
10 I can't get into, you know, anything involving 11 any particular investigation.
12 Q.
16
Q.
21
THE WITNESS:
22 I never said faking a residency was no big 23 deal, you know, to anyone.
I can't imagine
25 that.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
#
1
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 14 of 91
Page 14
1 I've kind of wracked my brain and tried to
2 think, you know, could I have said it in some 3 other context where it could be misconstrued.
4
6 like that, you know, at any point in time in my 7 career. It kind of counters what is fact with
8 the Medical Board, that we take discipline 9 actions every year based upon false statements
10 and we certainly have -- there are cases where
15
18 at that time.
Okay.
24
A.
25 said that.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 15 of 91
Q.
Right.
A.
Q.
Right.
A.
Q.
That's the way I read it. Okay. Now, let me ask you this: Do
14
A.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 16 of 91
Page 16
1 of this article, you know, when it came out,
3 quite frankly.
And my recollection
13 say, you know, we hadn't talked about this 14 quote or, you know, indirect quote and so
15 forth.
Q
17 disaffirm ---
18
A.
_,
,.-.- -
'
,_.,I
A .
,r~..--~..?.,
L G m L 1 -
. : . . , , , t i .
s-
.I
, 1...
+ I * -
*.-:?..-.
I. !
.-..'.biL.%&
&.l.~(*A~~--.,tn1l---*&-%-_
d
'
" * ~ --H..,'
I..
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 17 of 91
16 deny that you had made the quoted remark to 17 Mr. Heimlich'? 18
A.
Q.
21
A.
Q.
No.
In your conversations subsequent to
23 the publication of the article, did you contact 24 Mr. Francis because you were upset about the
25 publication of the article?
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 18 of 91
Yeah.
12
Q.
Okay.
And so there was a judgment made at
I
1
Did I get
Sure.
I mean,
1
!:
I.
~mbcf-A-
mar.rhi.*-tcr~&~rma-~~uc
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 19 of 91
Page 19
1 different people involved in the complaint or
1;
i'
2 the investigation.
12
Okay.
Did you
A.
Okay.
20
Y-ou are asking -- I mean, you are
21 asking of two different people and you can ask 22 of five or ten different people and you are 23 kind of roundabout getting at whether I've ever
24 had a conversation with, you know, those
25 people.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
r-
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 20 of 91
f
Page 20 1
[
1 extremes.
I
I
i
2 Francis, he's a reporter, you know, they wrote 3 an article, I'm quoted in this article;
Q.
1;
I. !
II::
I ,:
8 Francis.
I
1:
Okay.
!
I'
i
10
A.
1:
I.
1;
1
J understand.
17 question:
i
t
) 20 falsifying crederltizls?
.Yes.
i 22 of my
earlier questions?
I!
I
Oh, yes,
-t-,
j70u
.:, ...
@.+
., .
. r : . . , r ? a ~ : t ; * - p a , i . .
i;iitttttt~~,ff' .: r;v.x.+
i~A:,~::,..:,.:v.~.
r%+*:ibibLw~.+).~i~v*& ,
J';
\
- %
!. ': f;
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 21 of 91
i
b
1 I
'*-
You can go to
3 you can ask the Board and they would give you
Yes.
9
Q-
Go ahead.
10 something?
1 w a n t e d t-o say in t e r ~ n sof w h a t I
18
and
1
I
I
Okay.
i
t
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 22 of 91
A.
8 Francis, after the article was published, did 9 you have any conversat.ion -- excuse me, did the
12 recall.
A.
rl
But my
20 recollection is that I did speak to him and. did 21 question him about not having an opportunity 22 to, you know, respond to things that he is 23 saying, or sonleone is saying that I said.
24
Q.
25 deadline to meet?
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 23 of 91
Page 23 j,
I
And yes, my
1I
/
I
I/
1I
bring
Do you
1
I
19 article?
20
A.
I've read it
21 before.
I
11 24 talked to
me briefly at t h a t time.
Whether he
I
i . i . C l t ~ ~ r ~ w
( I '
2 5 t a l k e d to me a h o u t it on the phone or n o t ,
.
,
I
.
1: 1:
!
. ~
-.
- -.
.-%,t.
....rep
r . * t r m
-tlW*i.r.:-r
K-*IZ'-,
b % r c C J -16,
% .;,
2 s i '
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 24 of 91
5 too.
6
A.
Okay.
I I
1
i
Ii
/
I1 2 0 t h a t
i1
there wa:i
'I
1
i
or this type of
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 25 of 91
Page 2 5
,:
\
1 situation.
iI
1
I
3 or not that wzs a long conversation or I'm just 4 melding other conversations with other
5 reporters - 6
7
(2
Okay.
I I
11 credentials b y a p h y s i . c i a n ?
12
1
I
T j n s t can't recall.
I1
i1
i 1
I
Okay.
A.
Okay.
I'm sorry.
I wasn't listening
1
/
1I
I
1I
About ny conversations
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 26 of 91
Page 2 6 1.
[
I
3 p r o c e s s e s and s o forth.
In the article,
"Dilling
t r a i n i n g was n o t a r e q u i r e m e n t
And that c e r t a i n l y i s
Ii
8 for licensure."
9 s o m e t h i n g that I r e c a l l saying.
I've said i t
11 q u e s t i o n s ,
I1
/I
i
i i
I
15 b i t w i t h my menory, t h a t , w e l l ,
1
/
17 a b o u t that..
I
i
18
Does t h a t s t a t e m e n t . t r i g g e r your
/ 20 M r . F r a n c i s ? 1
1 1i
I
21
No, b u t s e e ,
that's a general
2 3 p e r i o d o f tirne, a n d I w ~ u l dh a v e t r i e d t o
24 a n s w e r t h a t for a n y b o d y .
Then l e t m e g o back t o t h e
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 27 of 91
Page 27
1 question I asked a few minutes ago.
I apologize.
That's okay.
13 yeah, I know.
That is something
20 Board's website.
Thank you.
CROSS-EXAMINATION
25 BY MR. ZIRM:
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 28 of 91
Page 28 :
A.
Q.
No problem.
We met briefly.
A.
Okay.
11
12
What did that job entail? It's a lot like what I do today.
i
4
--
There's been
I
21
2 3 and supervising member with an analysis, a 2 4 legal analysis of where we were in terms of
I
~ ~ , , ~ ~ t ~ t l w ~ - ~ ~ ~ c h ; - c h ; - . ~ T T - T .~ T~ T tn ~~ -i iT di Ti iT uT ~t Tj t~~ , ..u.; . is ~ ~~ 4, ~ ~ ~i ~ n - i i - *mu5a* .~. rj~---
.a;'
x.-k
. + .
-1 .T
-2.
, w * ~4* .aj+,t-
.2.
+4,31i~i1>
.-
"J
,+t*.,
'.m
dd
u~:T---
.;t*~.is.
~ - - . . ~ . i t ~ ~ ~ - i ~ ~ ~ ~ ta.$ a a ~ . s . ~ .
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
*
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 29 of 91
.
Page 29
1 case against a licensee.
2
'
i
Q.
I
I
8 place and that, obviously, we had other duties 9 and so forth, I was given almost from the start
10 a lot of, I guess, leeway in terms of doing
s
i
I
We had
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 30 of 91
Page 30
1 idea was to push me more in the direction of
8 That was a supervisory position, because until 9 that time I had not had direct supervisory 10 experience, and I believe my role there was to
11 supervise, geez, I think some executive staff
12 people.
13 role, but it wasn't for that long a time. 14 then the director at that time was Ray 15 Baumgardner and he retired, and so I had
16 applied for the job and had the job from 2000
18
Q.
22 involvement.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 31 of 91
Page 31
1 questions, and at the same time we were even
3 you know, more staff in the past two years 4 since I've left, and so it became necessary at
-- or
9 staff.
10 didn't take up much time in terms of -- you 11 know, I didn't get involved in that many cases, 12 but there were occasions which I did.
The same
13 with talking to the press or even picking up 14 the phone and talking to anybody; I was a 15 pretty accessible person in terms of, you know, 16 I would give anybody my telephone number, my 17 direct line, and people would call.
And when
18 you called and you had a question, I tried to 19 answer it for you, you know, trying to give you 20 a little bit of feel.
Sure.
22 director, how big was the investigative staff 23 of the State Medical Board? 24
. ,.
~ ~ ~ - ~ 1 i i ~ : ~ . - r ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ 1 r i ~ r ~ ~ r ~ 1; t r* ~ 1~ ? t ~ i i u i i ~ x i n~ t r c r
>
ma*~ ~
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
I
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 32 of 91
I'm sorry.
Two supervisors?
accountable to all of that chain going down. And would every complaint be assigned
17 complaints a year.
It had steadily,
You know, it
25
Participate would be
--
is kind of a
4 broad word.
10 then said, hey, Tom, this just came in, what do 11 you think of this?
12 this.
13 somebody and say, hey, we need to move on such 14 and such a complaint.
So something of that
17
Q.
And I take it, I mean, you started That's kind of what you
18 out in enforcement.
20 complaints?
23
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 34 of 91
Page 34
1 you, as a general matter, produce notes, memos,
2 something that would end up in the file
It would probably
6 depend on the nature of that information, you 7 know, how long the call was, what they were
-- had some
If I felt
14 the record, then I probably wouldn't put all 15 that much, or see all that much urgency to say,
16 hey, talked to so-and-so and such and such. 17 Would I today?
Probably so.
20
Q.
~ i~l )~ ra ; ? e f i l ( & C j i l i ~ ~ ! ~ t t ; t 1 1 $ l ! L ~ - ~ : : + ~ ~ : l i ~ L7 i& i ki l . i ! l i i ~ , ~ i r . l . * r j i j : $ ~ k e i t 1 L i l l ~ C ~ ~.~.~;.~11~!1!Lfd,.~~~;:~I:Il1~~~~Ui,tI>~, :. ~+-hrn(l&--i~~. I . . - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I J + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ , I I ~ ~. ~ r +~l c ~r~ . l -. . - a- , -. l~l ~ L ~I> L , ~I ~L~ ~ ~ ~ L. C . ~ t !~
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 35 of 91
Page 35
1 here today?
No.
3 you.
Q.
A.
MS. PFEIFFER:
THE WITNESS:
15 Medical Board.
Q.
20 because we've had some discussions recently 21 about, you know, just what that was, but, you
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 36 of 91
Page 36
1 to delete that information, get rid of that
4 that doesn't mean that you always go and, you 5 know, get everything.
11
Q.
17 far as physician discipline and, for instance, 18 if Dr. Patrick had ever been disciplined by the 19 Ohio State Medical Board,
That would be a
Yes,
22 Q.
-- what
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 37 of 91
Page 37
1
Sure.
4 Then a lot of the stuff that happens after that 5 is public record; if you go to a hearing, the
6 hearing transcript.
8 confidentiality provisions that protect that. 9 The identity of the complainant is protected, 10 you know, within that process. But you get Some
12 cases are settled, you know, as well so you 13 don't have that.
14
The Board
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 38 of 91
Page 38
1 So what you will hear is this report and
So all that's
--
Yes.
-- or her?
And the opportunity to be heard on
13 those charges.
Why did you leave the Medical Board? Well, there's probably a lot of
16 personal reasons, you know, just in terms of
17 who I am and where I was at the time, but I 18 really loved the Medical Board.
I loved
22 leave.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 39 of 91
Q.
Okay.
4 documents. 5
MR. ZIRM:
.
Okay.
Just take a moment to review this 9 document for me. Okay. Have you ever seen this document
12 before?
A.
Q.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 40 of 91
9 changed?
12
13
A.
18 lawsuit, which the Board was a named defendant, 19 you know, nationally going after the Boards for
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 41 of 91
Page 41
1 ability, without the Board, you know, getting
7 training.
8
12 level.
16 and so forth.
But that's probably pretty much the That was what was changed. They
20 three prongs.
It used
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 42 of 91
Page 42
1 Board at all involved in the accreditation of
Yeah.
I will
SO in essence,
!
I
I
13 the Boards, individual Board can have some 14 impact upon those systems and how things work
17
I see.
20
21
Q.
23 programs?
24
A.
Yes.
, :
Iltmltll * .
44 z l i i i m Z k i e e i = ---::.u~.itfi~
:rittr:rf.f-~-~*Y1Wb
I L ~ ~ ~ ~ ' L I I Z ~ ~ Y I - ' -
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
I
v
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 43 of 91
Page 43
1
,
1
1 i
Now
j
i
7 one.
It's been
8 a couple years and now I'm out and I'm trying 9 to think of the, you know, who the different
:!
--
'I
I
I'm
:t
A.
I don't want to
Q.
MR. ZIRM:
MS. PFEIFFER:
THE WITNESS:
25 the case.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
t
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 44 of 91
Page 44
1 you those two differentiations between U.S. and
2 Canada schools and the foreign schools, all of
>
But I
Q.
10 June 6, 2 0 0 6 ,
A.
t~
14 how to
15
16
Q.
!
I 1
2 0 whether
23
24
A.
I
I
25 subject?
I
I
la,_.-,,.urq&-.
. r . i ~ ~ ~ ~ * . ~ z r l
I r~ ~ ?~ I I H H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ? ~ ~~ tb ir ~~ ~L ~ ;~ U J ~ ~ J ~ I~ & W~ L~U 'I & ~W . ~ S K < ? U ~ ?~ ~. ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ . t I ~ -t i ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ l i l ~ t t . ~ ~ 1 ~ . ~ ~ F~ I O.' ~ ~ -L1 1 1~ ill i i ii- * lA 1- I ~ 1 r ~ r-U
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 45 of 91
Page 45 Yeah.
2
Yes, I do.
Q.
3 that prior to
5 training certificate
6
A.
Yes.
-- to participate in a residency or
8 internship or fellowship?
A.
A.
Not mandatory, right, not required. That's your understanding as well? Yes. Are you aware that at some time prior
1 6 in Ohio's history, there were training 1 7 certificates called temporary certificates, 1 8 that there was a name change?
Q.
Okay.
2 1 about
25 a residency program?
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 46 of 91
--
Right, sure.
A.
Right.
Again,
1 2 when I was the director and somebody else did 1 3 that work, but I still was involved, but there 1 4 used to be a program, I can't tell you what it 1 5 dates back to, but this temporary
16 certificate --
Yes.
2 1 statute was worded, but it was interpreted by 2 2 someone, be that the Board, AG office,
-...
'
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 47 of 91
1 these.
The Medical Board did? The Medical Board did. There may
10 have been some type of cursory review for those 11 certificates in terms of, you know, does this 12 really look like this came from Ohio State or 13 some other program? We know who is running
17 just handing out temporary certificates. 18 don't want to be too flip about, you know, what 19 went into it, but it's nowhere near what goes
20 into the process, which is application oriented
23
Q.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 48 of 91
Page 48
1 require a temporary certificate?
9 certificates.
10 well? 11
A.
Yeah.
24
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
I I
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 49 of 91
Page 49
1 disciplinary procedures that have been
A.
a search,
Q.
Okay.
We have issued
-- the
12 case.
15 subpoena.
18 in here.
20 for Endorsement of a Medical License by the 21 State Medical Board. Can you tell me what
23
A.
-r*
. -.
~ L - ~ ~ , . . . - L - -
e-=tn,&i.h.Y----dt~nI~.~r
'
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 50 of 91
Page 50
1 requirements.
5 jump through a couple more hoops if you didn't 6 have that license previously.
I guess that was going to be my next
8 question.
12
A.
Yes.
That's a
18
Q.
--
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 51 of 91
Page 51
2 Preliminary Education?
3 term.
I was going to say, this document, 5 think, pre-dates even me being at the Medical 6 Board.
Q.
8 A.
9 context.
Q.
11
A.
12 think, through the back here, '88, 2000, or 13 whatever, that there was certain statutory 14 requirements, like 4731 in '05, '06, that you 15 have a high school diploma or equivalency and 16 you had to go to college prior to you going to 17 medical school.
I think that's the term, the
21 that somebody needs to verify that or do 22 something, you know, with respect to that. 23 That's the best of my recollection. 24 Q. Okay.
I will not profess to be an expert on
f
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
1
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 52 of 91
.
Page 5 2
1 that.
2
I
1
Let me ask you to turn a couple more At the top it will say form Roman
3 pages.
A.
Yes.
I &
$
21 has.
22
Q.
i
I
---
4 -
my?(.
h.+ii._
-./G.tU
'(4
8-1
z1111t141&II111
-<.,
.--..
<jt>+bdd&c
L,&mSt+-m--?-
L ,
L***-.-d
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 53 of 91
.
Page 53
+
Qo
2 kind of insert how long he's been in the 3 practice of medicine, the applicant?
Sure. Do you see that? Yes. Qo It says, has been in the practice of
f
$'
8 medicine, in the top one, for the last 9 one-and-a-half years at Jewish Hospital,
1 0 Cincinnati.
11
i 1
12 13
14 is?
15
-- a requirement,
I
t
!
>i
-.
,,#,I
' :
,,lit'#
,L-
t*L,tMC<..z--.mm
'lld.<'.>.~----
-*-..zi>>Lsi?-
J h I L 2 2 % r i ~ a i h & *I .-
--s-.d~-dt~lL
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 54 of 91
Page 54
1 mean, again, people, the term
4 does today.
7 understanding of it.
I
1
16 allowed to be practicing, blah, blah, blah. 17 So again, I think this probably was
-- you
I think there's
24 character.
2 5 licensure.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 55 of 91
Page 55
1 somebody.
2 I know we can go after people solely on that, 3 but I'm pretty confident we threw it on there 4 on a few criminal convictions and so forth, and 5 said they didn't meet this, and this is part of 6 our denial process.
Q.
I can't recall.
Yes.
Q.
Yes.
Q.
22
23 executive director?
Yes.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 56 of 91
Page 56
1 you are familiar with while you were with the
2 Board?
A.
Sure.
4 time.
20 and say, well, instead of our normal two 21 letters and going back three years, this guy we
22 better go back five years and so forth.
23
11111~~)r~116iRi41b~d - l1 4k U -~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i . ~ I I l i 1 1 ~ ~ - ~ ~ l t t ~ i lrldrtL)e*~k~#.illUlt.:~-.i-ii1iUL:kti~1trt1+-=. l l . ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ . l ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ - ~ . . . . a n r i l c U l x t ~ a 4 ~ * r ) h . ~ = ~
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 57 of 91
#
i:
I
I
6 so forth.
I would
1: 11
:
f
L
9 other factors. 10
Q.
E
d
I
!
13 it sounds like what you are saying is, at least 14 when you were executive director, there really
15 was no set policy as to what would or wouldn't
1
I
1
!
Right.
II
1
1
I
--
but I
,
S
I
n
Il
Okay.
-- not the
!I
i!
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 58 of 91
Page 58
1 very last, but towards the end, there's seven,
Correct.
A.
Yes.
10 be.
12 there, but I've heard stories of different 13 people, yeah, heard names.
14 that.
Yeah, I recognize
So does the
-- well, this is
A.
Yeah.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 59 of 91
Page 59
1 requirements under whatever sections, and Board
3 through and X off, you know, each one, but they 4 would make that type of motion.
To the best of
Okay.
10 11 Ken?
MR. BLANKENSHIP:
MR. ZIRM:
MR. BLANKENSHIP:
15
16 happen.
17
MR. ZIRM:
THE WITNESS:
Okay.
Is it okay if I
21 a short break?
22 (A brief recess was taken.)
Q.
23
When
--
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 60 of 91
Page 60
1 letter sent to you September 6, 2002
-- which
4 have is redacted.
A.
Yeah.
Am I correct?
I'm fine with that,
--
16
A.
Yes.
physician complaint?
A. I can't recall that.
25
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
*
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 61 of 91
.
Page 61 1 Did there ever come a time when you
2 learned
3
b
I
A.
I'm
--
10 article in Scene but there have been articles 1 1 published in Cincinnati where Peter Heimlich is
5
I
15 16 Q.
!
3
19
'1
I
i
22 an investigation.
I.
23
Q.
24 rather broadly.
25
LH---II_-~
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
3
I
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 62 of 91
Page 62
1 to understand, to answer the best I can live
So by virtue of my response, I
3 just want you to understand that it's not -4 it's limited to that context.
5
Q.
6 here.
This is the one that was out of Let me hand you what has been marked as
16 order.
Exhibit 60 purports to be a printout 20 of an e-mail from Kay Rieve to an undisclosed 21 recipient, subject Dr. Edward Patrick.
22 you seen this e-mail before?
Have
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 63 of 91
1 me?
THE WITNESS:
3 a moment.
Sure.
Okay.
9 terms of a public records request or a request 10 from the public, of which I would want our
11
And, of course, we
16 we do.
I do
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 64 of 91
I
.
Page 64
I feel compelled by the statute to
Dr.
Correct.
2 2 degree but she has been in licensure for a good 2 3 period of time.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
*
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 65 of 91
Page 65
1 had other people who helped her respond to this
2 request.
Okay.
4 was just asking for publicly available 5 information but it did have to do with a 6 physician that may be under investigation, it
7 wouldn't necessarily be -- that wouldn't
8 necessarily require her not to answer the
9 question; is that right?
Correct.
11
Correct.
Absolutely, yeah.
Q.
12 long has Kay Rieve been with the Board? 13 She, I think, pre-dates me, you know, You know, I
Okay.
19
A.
-- overseeing the
22 licensure and records sections, and I don't 23 know if she still is that person, but that's
24 where she was when I was there and in 2002.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 66 of 91
Page 66
1 second paragraph of this e-mail, the Board did
Do you
7 or not?
8
Yeah.
10 around in 1976. Okay. You know, I could give you my guess, 13 but it would be more of a guess at this point. That's fine.
I might have known sometime in the
You know,
21 ever learned?
Yeah, exactly.
My
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
I
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 67 of 91
Page 6 7 Do you know who Phil Heimlich is? Yes. Are you personally acquainted with
4 Phil Heimlich?
question. A.
i
1
9 in any way.
10
1
I
A.
17 question.
18 Obviously when you complain anonymously, it 19 makes the job a lot more difficult, and so
I 1
And
,
i
?
I
1
-.a+.-Hw~=~tt.tt
1111
I..~Ic.-A+*+~+P--= ..IC~~~*II
_aaaII
uwis~ir-
* r w u e : . ~ .n**c.=z:y ~
..ii>l~tlUn~irt=---~HUI)~rrr~~:~~.~-~.r-.-r~~~
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
b
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 68 of 91
Page 68
1 close it type of deal.
Correct. Do you know Gary Harris? I've heard the name, but again, you
9 know, in my position with the Board, positions
10 over time, you can throw out some names at me 11 that I recognize and are in the health care 12 field and that person would say, oh, Tom 13 Dilling, I know Tom Dilling, and again, I wish 14 I had my three-year-old's ability to recall 15 names and that, but I'm sorry that I don't
16 necessarily.
19 been marked Exhibit Number 62 and ask if you 20 would take a look at that, if you would.
Was
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 69 of 91
A.
-- well, no,
I think I'm
14
A.
15 things that may not appear to you or to anyone 16 else on any individual matter to be something 17 that the Board was involved in or interested 18 in, and I can't really tell you that that was 19 the case in here, but I think that the nature 20 of what is being asked, and I specifically
21 refer to like fraudulent, you know, and so
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 70 of 91
Page 70
1 the sense that this is asking for like an
5 potential fraud and, you know, evidence and 6 things like that, so I'm backing off even 7 further from attempting to answer that based 8 upon the privilege.
Q.
Okay. Right.
11
Correct.
17 type of general question about the law and how 18 it applies that may have sparked your interest 19 through some type of e-mail like that, I'd be
20 glad to help you, if I can. Let me just ask whether this document
22 refreshes your recollection as to whether you
23 know Gary Harris.
24
A.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 71 of 91
Page 71
1 Harris, General Counsel, Health Alliance of
2 Greater Cincinnati.
3 Alliance.
9 whatever.
13 Hospital?
19 So we are clear, when you use the term 20 privilege, I'm not sure it's --
21
22 23
24
MR. ZIRM:
The confidentiality
Right.
That's fine if
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
1
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 72 of 91
.
Page 72
1 you use privilege, so long as we are all on the
:
I
t
2 same page.
3
Q.
A.
A.
A.
You know, I can't recall. I'm going to ask you some more
I
I
i
I
20 of Scene.
24 some documents, which include what Mr. Francis 25 has testified to, and these are transcripts of
~rlrr-u*ur~2~-1~~ku;ku;tt11~~~--M-rM1~FL~<hhLtll-I~:Jx.n
I.~l(llll.
'
&
*lllllkl0-(kr-IP*?I%2tIf12l.
I l i l r r ~ lJEW-WP*-
'2-
I . ' . ~ ~ . * . . I I A dd-+--i L ~
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 73 of 91
.
1 his notes.
Page 7 3
I
4
Okay. And this is a page that I've taken 4 from the transcription of his notes.
I 1
i
I
f
I
I
A.
Sure.
I
1
10 supposedly taking place prior to his writing of 11 the article? 12 tell me?
i
13
They
:i
t
1
I I
14 weren't dated.
15
MR. BLANKENSHIP:
1 think this is
I
Yes.
I would assume
19
MR. ZIRM:
21 the article.
22 23 THE WITNESS:
Okay.
Q.
i
1
I
I
I I
-- .
..
,A___
..-.
"
I
3
>
>r
,, . ,
rni'ir
~-l*n*,vb.it&
h~;nhh*..,lil---.-.------
& ~ * ~ - - L U : T ---I1 Y ~ Y . Y ~ L
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 74 of 91
>
;
I
I think
t
i
I
I
Q
A.
i
I I
--
--
be more
I I
L
5
i
i
Okay.
16 question, is there anything here that he has 17 written down that purports to be what you've
22 you can see -- you get a feel from the article 23 as well
24 I was saying.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
c
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 75 of 91
.
1 20 years now, you know, and so it's a constant
Page 7 5
So I do that to the
7 comes out.
8
12
not me.
15
Q.
When I say we
Okay.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 76 of 91
That's how I
Okay.
A.
15 what I'm reading here and based upon that 16 article and, you know, my recollection, you
17 know, to the best of my ability, that he did
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 77 of 91
Page 7 7
10 by doing that.
A.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 78 of 91
Page 7 8
1 more their job, but I was involved in a number 2 of high profile cases over the years because
3 there weren't that many of us, you know, at
4 that time, and being involved in Board's
5 rule-making is what -- was somewhat started 6 because of disciplinary matters and because of 7 my role at the government that, yeah, I had a 8 relationship with, you know, a number.
And then when I was director, they 10 don't want to talk to the person who talks to
I
1
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 79 of 91
Page 79
1 get a relationship with somebody or you get a
10 your conversation with Mr. Francis before the 11 publication of the article was off the record? 12
A.
No.
And again, I
20 know, term.
To me,
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 80 of 91
Page 80
1 that article.
3 think that somebody is just being led in a 4 certain direction or is just stuck on that and 5 I think that perhaps I can convince them in 6 some way that that's not the case, I will; so 7 is it possible? And again, I don't recollect
8 this, but is it possible he said something or I 9 wanted to say something to the effect of, look,
17 somebody.
18
19
(2
20 say that to somebody on the record, depending 21 on the context, you know, if somebody threw 22 some quotes at me that, you know, I didn't
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
a
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 81 of 91
You know, but again, in short, I 4 can't recall doing that here. Possible, you don't remember? Right, correct. Okay.
8 Mr. Blankenship's question, I thought I heard 9 you say you saw the article sometime after it
10 came out but you're not sure how it was brought
To the best of my
23 it.
24 up in Cleveland, telling me, hey, I saw this 25 Cleveland Scene thing with the Medical Board or
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 82 of 91
Page 82
1 whatever.
2 read it.
3
4 contemplated writing something in response, 5 like a letter to the editor kind of thing?
6
Yes .
Q
8 that?
12 this is my opinion, and it's somebody who was 13 the director of the Board and it was somebody
14 who had given their entire post-graduate
15 career, I guess, to the Board, and certainly 16 you can say I'm a true believer, because while
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
P
1 -4
D
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 83 of 91
Page 8 3
5 governor, you know, everybody, and when 6 somebody says that, and I know that the Board 7 is kind of counter to that in terms of how they
8 view falsification, you know, then yeah, I
9 don't think that the correct message has been 10 sent out, and so I want to correct that
11 message.
I want to
16 article is about, yet, you know, by cutlines 17 and the headlines and so forth, you can create, 18 I understand that, a different sense, and it 19 sells papers or it draws readers1 attention.
20 And perhaps that is the point that the author
Journalism
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 84 of 91
Page 84
1 paragraphs into the article, especially one of
2 this length.
3 forth. Anyways -4
A.
Right.
But
10 then, you know, other people are paid to, I 11 guess, calm Tom down and, you know, let him 12 think about this and also, you know, say, 13 again, I started off with the counsel of you
That's something said to me all the You know, it's not maybe a
16 time, it seems.
Q.
I have
I have
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 85 of 91
Page 85
1 pictures on mine.
Sure.
Q.
Yes.
9
Q.
17 understanding?
18
A.
Yeah.
19 still is today.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 86 of 91
Page 86
4 disciplinary actions. 5
Now, just like anything, you can look
11 just one sentence, says, "he," referring to 12 Peter Heimlich, "had several long conference 13 calls with Dilling and Mark Michael, an
15 Office."
16
A.
17 earlier with the confidentiality provision, 18 which would preclude me from answering those
19 type of questions, that one specifically.
Forgive me if Mr. Blankenship asked 21 you this question, but a few paragraph down, it
22 says, "because the Medical Board complaints are 23 confidential --
Yes.
--
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 87 of 91
9 in the conversation that you showed me, those 10 notes. That seemed reflective of our
12
Q.
Is that a true
16
18 a grounds for discipline that says you -19 physicians shall not make a false, fraudulent,
20 or misleading statement.
24 things.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 88 of 91
Page 88
1 statement but the court said otherwise.
Sure.
-- then the court and the Board, when
11 they are exerting their discretion, is going to 12 look into it and say, what did the guy get out
13 of this?
When Mr. Francis talked to you before 17 the publication of the article, if he had asked 18 you about specific - - whether you had 19 conversations with Peter Heimlich about Dr. 20 Patrick or specific things that you and Peter
A.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 89 of 91
Q.
Okay.
MS. PFEIFFER:
9 informative.
10
Non-responsive but
I'm going to
12
13 P a t r i c k ?
MR. ZIRM:
No follow-up.
MS. PFEIFFER:
THE WITNESS:
Okay.
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 90 of 91
Page 90
Dated - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Case 1:05-cv-02791-LW
Document 120
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 91 of 91
Page 91
1 STATE OF OHIO
2 COUNTY OF GREENE
3
SS: CERTIFICATE
7 above-named THOMAS DILLING, was by me first 8 duly sworn to testify the truth, the whole 9 truth and nothing but the truth; that said
day of
, 2007.