Eco-Hydrological and Eco-Hydrogeological Impact Assessment of the Proposed Corrib Onshore Pipeline Supplementary Information Report

Appendix D
Permeability Test (Falling Head) Results Database

QMEC Environmental Limited

1008-052

Corrib Onshore Pipeline

Eco-hydrological and Eco-hydrogeological Impact Assessment Supplementary Information Report
Location Peizo/Tube ID Initial Depth (mbgl) Displacement (m) from SWL T1-C1-P3 T1-C1-P2 T1-C1-P1 T1-C3-PH1 T1-C3-P3 T1-C3-P2 T1-C3-P1 T1-C4-PH1 T1-C4-P3 T1-C4-P2 T1-C4-P1 T1-C6-PH1 T1-C6-P3 T1-C6-P2 T1-C6-P1 T2-C1-PH1 T2-C1-P3 T2-C1-P2 T2-C1-P1 T2-C3-PH1 T2-C3-P3 T2-C3-P2 T2-C3-P1 T2-C4-PH1 T2-C4-P4 T2-C4-P3 T2-C4-P2 T2-C4-P1 T1-C1-PH1 T1-C1-P2 T1-C1-P1 T1-C3-PH1 T1-C3-P3 T1-C3-P2 T1-C3-P1 T1-C4-PH1 T1-C4-P3 T1-C4-P2 T1-C4-P1 0.875 1.34 2.1 0.68 0.835 1.08 1.315 0.62 0.845 0.95 0.91 0.6 0.86 0.97 2.285 0.815 1.07 1.73 2.12 0.75 0.945 0.81 1.71 0.665 0.97 1.23 1.38 2.14 0.025 0.235 0.3 0.105 0.24 0.42 0.69 0.905 1.02 1.14 1.395 1.3 2.3 3.28 0.3 1.3 2.3 3.23 0.3 1.3 2.3 3.9 0.3 1.3 2 3.08 0.3 2 3.3 4.23 0.3 2.3 3.3 4.4 0.3 1.3 2.3 3.3 4.4 0.3 0.9 1.2 0.3 1 1.5 1.81 0.3 1.1 1.7 2.2 Water Column K Hydraulic Height (m) conductivity (m/sec)* 1.03 1.82 2.16 0.22 1.2 2.04 2.19 0.28 1.17 2.14 3.89 0.32 1.15 1.82 1.7 0.06 1.73 2.46 3.09 0.16 2.08 3.41 3.64 0.22 1.01 1.84 2.8 3.29 0.38 0.88 1.21 0.32 0.99 1.12 1.52 0.28 1.05 1.67 1.92 5.04E-09 5.31E-10 4.31E-10 7.83E-05 4.89E-09 8.65E-09 2.10E-10 4.35E-10 1.45E-09 6.93E-08 7.74E-07 2.27E-06 9.49E-10 2.45E-09 1.62E-11 9.72E-07 6.95E-09 5.07E-10 4.85E-10 3.22E-09 1.29E-09 1.29E-07 2.67E-10 4.44E-07 1.48E-09 5.86E-10 1.76E-09 5.34E-10 2.11E-08 2.69E-08 1.23E-07 1.70E-11 5.99E-09 1.75E-10 1.79E-09 5.41E-10 3.68E-10 1.72E-08 2.90E-10

Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Terminal Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose

QMEC Environmental Ltd

1008-019.xls

Page 1 of 2

Corrib Onshore Pipeline

Eco-hydrological and Eco-hydrogeological Impact Assessment Supplementary Information Report
Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Aughoose Bellagelly Bellagelly Bellagelly Bellagelly Bellagelly Bellagelly Bellagelly Glencullen Glencullen Glencullen Glencullen Glencullen Glencullen Glencullen T1-C5-PH1 T1-C5-P3 T1-C5-P2 T1-C5-P1 T1-C1-P3 T1-C1-P2 T1-C1-P1 T1-C2-PH1 T1-C2-P3 T1-C2-P2 T1-C2-P1 T4-C4-P2 T4-C4-P1 T4-C5-P2 T4-C5-P1 T5-C1-P3 T5-C1-P2 T5-C1-P1 0.31 0.38 0.53 1.06 1.65 1.7 4.2 0.535 1.46 1.46 3.25 0.6 0.83 0.77 0.8 0.675 0.94 1.145 0.3 1.5 2 2.8 2 3.5 4.26 0.3 2 3 3.87 1.55 2.8 1.2 1.8 1 2 3 0.1 1.33 1.78 2.14 0.75 2.51 0.91 0.33 1.18 2.24 1.15 1.49 2.59 1.12 1.8 0.92 1.85 2.75 5.39E-10 4.32E-10 1.67E-09 8.00E-11 7.61E-10 2.69E-08 9.39E-11 3.56E-06 1.70E-09 1.14E-09 2.15E-10 2.65E-08 3.35E-09 2.16E-08 2.84E-06 4.31E-08 6.09E-08 4.12E-06

* Analysis completed using Bower & Rice Solution.

QMEC Environmental Ltd

1008-019.xls

Page 2 of 2

APPENDIX D Stone Road Reinstatement Drawings

Corrib Onshore Pipeline EIS

Errata

CORRIB ONSHORE PIPELINE ERRATA

COR25.1MDR0470Rp0027

Corrib Onshore Pipeline EIS

Errata

Chapter 7, Vol. 1 Traffic

The totals outlined in Table 7.6 for the construction traffic movements were incorrect in the EIS. The correct totals are outlined below. This table is repeated as Table 6.1 in Appendix F of the EIS. Table 7.6 Construction Traffic Movements Generated during the busiest Construction Period. AM Peak Construction Cars (L1203) Cars (L1202) Cars (Terminal) HGVs (L1203) HGVs (L1202) HGVs (Terminal) Total Arrivals 66 102 152 8 13 1 342 PM Peak Departures 66 102 152 8 13 1 342 Daily Arrivals 66 102 152 98 154 7 579 Departures 66 102 152 98 154 7 579

Departures Arrivals 0 0 0 8 13 1 22 0 0 0 8 13 1 22

Chapter 12, Vol. 1 Terrestrial Ecology

Table 12.1 on Page 12-15 should state Table 12.2.

Chapter 16, Vol. 1 Archaeology, Architectural and Cultural Heritage

The following impact levels for ID A5, A7, A9, A11 and A17 on Table 16.4 (pages 16-19 & 16-20) of Volume 1 of the EIS should state none instead of Potentially significant as shown.

Appendix N, Vol. 2 (Book 5 of 5) Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Report

References to scheduled for removal regarding Plate 38 in Appendix N should be removed.

Chapter 17, Vol. 1 Indirect, Cumulative Impacts and Impact Interactions

Paragraph 5 of page 17-22 states: "The total greenhouse gas emissions for the onshore element of the project are 16,651 tCO2eq, 2,737tCO2eq of which are the carbon losses from peat removal to the Srahmore Peat Deposition site or peat disturbance". This statement should state: "The total greenhouse gas emissions for the onshore element of the project are 17,270 tCO2eq, 3,356 tCO2eq of which are the carbon losses from peat removal to the Srahmore Peat Deposition site or peat disturbance". Table 17.6 on Page 17-23 should read as follows:

COR25.1MDR0470Rp0027

Corrib Onshore Pipeline EIS

Errata

Column 2, Line 3, 17,270 instead of 16,651 (tCO2eq) Column 4, Line 3 17,270 instead of 16,651(tCO2eq) Column 2, Line 6 318,175 instead of 317,556 (tCO2eq) Column 4, Line 6 1,009,900 instead of 1,009,281 (tCO2eq).

Paragraph 1 of Page 17-23 states: "From the above figures, the estimated total greenhouse gas emissions including those from carbon losses from the construction phase of the Corrib Onshore Gas Pipeline represent 5.2% of the total estimated greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of the Corrib Gas Field Development. The estimated contribution from carbon loss due to peat removal of 2,737tCO2eq from the construction of the Corrib Onshore Pipeline represents less than 1% of the total Greenhouse Gas Emissions associated with the construction of all elements of the Corrib Gas Field Development". This statement should state: "From the above figures, the estimated total greenhouse gas emissions including those from carbon losses from the construction phase of the Corrib Onshore Gas Pipeline represent 5.4% of the total estimated greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of the Corrib Gas Field Development. The estimated contribution from carbon loss due to peat removal of 3,356 tCO2eq from the construction of the Corrib Onshore Pipeline represents approximately 1% of the total Greenhouse Gas Emissions associated with the construction of all elements of the Corrib Gas Field Development".

COR25.1MDR0470Rp0027

Corrib Onshore Pipeline EIS

Errata

Appendix M3, Vol. 2 - Peat Stability Assessment Report

1. Page 19, 4th paragraph includes the following statement: The natural moisture content was determined on samples with values ranging from 7% to 100%, This statement should state: The natural moisture content was determined on peat samples with values ranging from 83% to 91%. 2. Page 28 includes the following statement: A FoS less than 1.5 was recorded in the area of about ch. 89,690 This statement should state: A FoS less than 1.5 was recorded in the area of about ch. 89,867 3. Page 29, Section 5.6.1 includes the following statement: A FoS less than 1.5 was recorded in the area of about ch. 96.690 This statement should state: FoS less than 1.5 was recorded in the area of about ch. 91.688 4. Page 31 final paragraph refers to chainage 87.220 but this should state chainage 87.219. 5. Page 31 final paragraph refers to chainage 89.690 but this should state chainage 89.867. 6. Page 32 second paragraph (10) (a) refers to chainage 87.220 but this should state chainage. 87.219. 7. Page 32 second paragraph (10) (b) refers to chainage 89.690 but this should state chainage 89,867. 8. Page 32 fourth paragraph (10) (c) refers to chainage 96.690 but this should state chainage 91.688.

Appendix M3, Vol. 2 - Peat Stability Assessment Report

In Appendix Q, (DNV report) (Page 80), there is a risk transect (graph) with a heading 'Risk Transects Corrib Pipeline - Person Outdoors for 8 hours per day IGE'. This should state 'Risk Transects Corrib Pipeline - Person Outdoors for 16 hours per day IGE'.

COR25.1MDR0470Rp0027

Corrib Onshore Pipeline EIS

Errata

Vol. 3 Srahmore Peat Deposition EIS

Page/Section Ref Page 1-4, Section 1.1, Para 13 Page 2-2, Section 2.2, paragraph 3 Page 2-4, Section 2.2, paragraph 2

Issue Oweninny Works rehabilitation plan approved by EPA in June 2002

Correction This should be corrected to approval in June 2003.

Spelling

On-Shire' should read 'On-Shore'

Page 2-4, Section 2.2, paragraph 6 Page 2-5, Section 2.4 paragraph 4 Page 2-16, Section 2.10, Table

Reference to Section 2.9 Reference to 5 no. surface water settlement ponds (2 no. ponds of 800 m2 each; 3 no. ponds of 400m2 each approximately)

Should reference Section 2.10 Correct Reference is 4 no. surface water settlement ponds (S5-1 - Area 256sq.m; S5-2 Area 666sq.m, and 2 no. ponds of 800 m2 each. There are also 3 no. surface water settlement lagoon in Area 6 (3 No. ponds of 400sq.m).

Reference to Section 4.2 Reference to Section 2.10 in Table

Should references Section 4.4

Page 7-6, Section 7.3.1, paragraph 2

Reference to Appendix 7.3 In relation to drainage from the Srahmore site, states ' Bord na Mna field drains and main outfalls drain Area 5, 6 and 7, each of which either partly or completely drain into the main drain' .

Page 7-6, Section 7.3.2.1, paragraph 2

Page9-8, Section 9.3.2, Paragraph 15

States 'There will be no drainage from Area 7 as all drains have been closed by Bord na Mna in this area under Oweninny Works IPC Licence rehabilitation plan'.

Page 9-11, Section 9.3.2, paragraph 27

In relation to the efficiency of treatment in the settlement lagoon, states ' Regular monitoring of the outfall quality was undertaken to ensure that onsite activities did not impacting the water quality'.

Should references Section 2.11 in Table Should reference an Appendix 7.2 which was not included in EIS. This Appendix is a site description for Tullaghan Bay by Birdwatch Ireland and does not devalue from the commentary provided in the EIS. Area 7 does not drain to the 'main drain'. Drainage in Area 7 would have naturally drained to the Munhin River. This drainage has now been impeded under IPC Licence rehabilitiation plan for Area 7. This correctrion does not detract from the discussion of drainage within the Srahmore site activty boundary provide in the EIS. The statement regarding impeded drainage in Area 7 is correct. There is no direct discharges from Area 7, however this is diffuse drainage from the rewetted bog in Area 7 under the IPC Licence rehabilitation plan. This correction does not detract from the discussion of drainage control within the Srahmore site activity boundary. The monitoring location for surface water quality, as required by the Waste Licence, is not directly from the outfall from the settlement lagoon, rather the sampling is undertaken at a composite sampler monitoring station on main surface water drain from the Srahmore site downstream (approx 250m) from the settlement lagoon, at the western extent of the Srahmore activity boundary. The monitoring undertaken within Srahmore is fully in accordance with the Waste Licence for the site. This monitoring point provides a reference as to the performance of the drainage control and treatment infrastructure.

COR25.1MDR0470Rp0027

Corrib Onshore Pipeline EIS

Errata

Page/Section Ref Page 9-12, Section 9.3.3 paragraph 1 Page 17-1, Section 17.1 paragraph 5 Appendix 9.1, Srahmore Annual Environmental Reports 2005, 2006 & 2007.

Issue Reference to Drawing 49032011

Correction

Should reference Drawing 4903-2029

Reference to Table 16.1

Should reference Table 17.1 The full Annual Environmental Reports, including Appendices are now available for submission. The omission of the Appendices does not devalue from the interpretation of the data provided in the AER itself.

Appendices of the Annual Environmental Reports were not included.

COR25.1MDR0470Rp0027