Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANNUAL BUDGET
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
FISCAL 2005 APPROVED ANNUAL BUDGET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
Make the best use of available resources by fully examining the relationships
between operating and capital investments and by continuously enhancing the
skills, capacity and productivity of WMATA's workforce.
REGIONAL ROLE
Take an appropriate leadership role in the region's transportation future, as well
as its region's transportation future, as well as its environmental, economic and
social well-being, developing funding commitments and executing programs
through active partnering with regional, state and local governmental units and
the private sector, building on the strong record of investment and success of the
existing system.
NATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS
Maintain and enhance a working partnership and a strong funding relationship
with the federal government, recognizing its special role as the region's major
employer and its relationship with the national transit industry.
.
i
1
Where it Goes
Capital Improvement
Program $314.1
$ Millions
EXPENSES
BUS OPERATIONS $310,636.7 $320,113.0 $333,264.3 $359,515.0 $26,250.7
RAIL OPERATIONS 446,849.1 469,929.0 498,963.2 532,471.5 33,508.3
PARATRANSIT 26,245.8 33,010.4 40,068.8 51,696.7 11,627.9
Maryland
Montgomery County $76.7 $16.7 $0.3 $0.3 $94.0
Prince George's County 84.1 19.1 0.3 0.4 $103.9
MD State 9.3 $9.3
$160.8 $35.8 $0.6 $10.0 $207.2
Virginia
Alexandria $17.6 $4.4 0.1 $22.1
Arlington County 29.5 8.5 0.8 0.2 $39.0
Fairfax County 55.9 0.2 0.2 0.3 $56.6
Fairfax City 0.9 13.8 $14.7
Falls Church 1.2 0.3 $1.5
Total $105.2 $27.2 $1.0 $0.6 $134.0
~:
I
I 1 I I I I
lUUU 1710 2100 4100 5100 6100
8100 3310 3410
3210
Polly Hanson Fred Goodine Peter Benjamin P. Takis Salpeas William Scott Edward Thomas Steven A. Feil Patrick Porzillo
Leona Agouridis Jack Requa
Chief AGM AGM AGM AGM AGM COO Chief
Metro Transit Capital Projects Wof1<.force Dev. &
AGM
Planning &
COO
System Safety Chief Finandal COmmunications Rail Services Engineer
Bus Services
Police Department & Risk Protection Officer Manaaement Diversitv PrOQrams Strateaic Proarams
AGM • System Safety and Risk Protection 3 4 4.00 1.12 2,16 0.20 0.46
Quality Enhancement and Analysis 15 15 15,00 3,64 10.21 0.06 1,09
Passenger Vehicle Fire Life Safety 14 13 ·1 13.00 3.64 7.02 0.65 1.56
Industrial Construction and Environmental Safety 12 13 1 13.00 4.45 5.45 1.95 010 1.05
Loss Control and Womer. Compensation 39 38 ·1 38.00 4.25 33.15 0.60
System Safety and Risk Protection 83 83 83.00 17.10 57.99 3.46 0.10 4.18
Oporatlons 8,141 8,313 1GB 8,109.18 3,635.54 3,990.79 10.02 72.41 11.65 38.76 280.91
Media Relations, Events & Employee Programs 10 10 10.00 3.83 6.14 0.02 0,01
AGM • Communication. 4 4 4.00 1.12 2.16 0.20 0048
SmarTrip Operations 40 40 34.00 15.67 12.36 0,03 0.52 0.05 2.27
Customer Service 84 84 84.00 43.45 38.50 2.05
Marketing 28 39 11 39.00 B.71 30.29
Project Communlcalions 13 13 13.00 3,26 8.40 1.34
Parking Lot Managemenl 0 6 6 6.00 5.60 0,40
Communications 179 196 17 190.00 16.04 103.45 2.10 0.73 0.05 4.49
Business Planning & Project DeVelopment 14 17 3 17,00 2.52 5,74 7.57 1.08
Information Technology and Services 112 111 ·1 111.00 31,08 59.94 5.55 13.32
AGM • Planning and Strategic Programs 6 7 1 7.00 ".96 3.78 0.35 0.84
Information Technology Renewal Program 18 18 18.00 0,45 0.52 0.01 1702
capital ProgrammIng and Oversight 15 16 1 16.00 3.92 7.56 2.70 Ula
Planning and Stratllglc Programs 165 169 4 169.00 39.93 n.54 16.18 33.94
Authority Total 10.056 10.294 238 10.077.28 4,040.09 5,089.88 12.23 72.47 29IU4 415.98 459.36
WMATA's total budget is divided into two broad categories: operating and capital costs.
This document displays WMATA's approved operating budget (Metrorail, regional
Metrobus, non-regional Metrobus, and Metro Access Paratransit operations) by office,
showing the line item account structure. The total approved operating budget of $971.2
million includes $27.5 million in debt service which is not included in the office budgets
and is therefore excluded from this section, leaving a total departmental operating cost of
$943.7 million. The $91.9 million capital cost displayed in this section by office is only
the amount spent internally, not including contracting in the capital program. This section
is thus a subset oftotal capital cost that includes only eIP project management and
support. CIP contract costs are shown beginning on page 191. For this budget, the
operating costs are in expenditures while the capital costs are for obligations. Beginning
in FY06, both will be in expenditures.
A small number of office budgets are capital only, and include the direct cost of capital
project management.
AGM - System Safety and Risk Protection 3,053.2 1.406.2 792.1 803.5 -975.7
Passenger Vehicle Fire Life Sarety 0.0 1,073.2 1,135.3 1,397.5 262.3
Industrial Construction and Environmental Safety 0.0 933.0 1,508.7 1,668.7 160.0
Loss Control and Workers Compensation 16,867.3 5.431.5 5,723.2 8,129.6 3,193.4
Quality Enhencemenl and Analysis 1,858.0 1.833.6 1.614.2 1.415.6 -198.7
System Safety and Risk Protection $21,776.5 $10.477.6 $10.773.5 $13.214.8 52.441.3
AGM - Planning and Strategic Programs 213.4 475.4 634.3 1,733.7 1,099.4
Capilel Programming and Oversight 377.2 1,607.5 3,028.5 1,740.2 -1,288.3
Business Planning & Project Development 1.173.8 1,184.3 2,063.3 1,824.2 -239.1
InformatIon Technology and Services 18,586.5 15,681.8 17,083.8 15,975.9 -1,108.0
Information Technology Renewal Program 0.0 1,892.6 2.467.5 2.026.4 -441.1
Planning and StrategiC Programs $20.350.9 $20.841.7 $25.277.5 523.300.4 -51,977.1
AGM - Syslem Safety and RiSk Protecllon 2,864.5 1.261.7 672.1 -290.1 -962,1
Passenger VehiCle Fire Life Salety 0.0 1.069.6 9622 1,184.4 222.2
Industrial Construcllon and Environmental Salety 0.0 828.5 1,257.1 1,329.2 72.1
loss Control and Workers Compensation 16,871.5 5.413.4 5,662.3 8,858.9 3.196.6
Quality Enhancement and AnatvsiS 1,844.1 1.632.5 1,551.8 1,325.1 -226.6
System Safety and Risk Protec1lon $21,580.1 $10.205.7 S10105.4 $12407.5 52302.1
AGM - Planning and Stralegic Programs 213.4 392.2 568.1 1,540.3 972.2
Capital Programming and Oversight 337.1 1,479.3 1.063.7 1.293.5 229.8
Business Plan"lng & Project Development 1,173.8 914.9 1,521.1 931.3 -589.8
Information Technology and Services 18,522.3 13,103.9 14,602.8 13,3726 -1,230.2
Information Technology Renewal Program 0.0 85D.6 75.8 106.6 '30.8
Plannlnp and Strategic Programs 520246.7 $16,140.9 $17.831.5 $17,244.3 -$587.2
IDOUoARS IN THOUSAIIDSI
Total Toullntwnal
_..;:B:;.::U!:::.-_---'R~a:;:;.il_......;.P=III='1t.:.::rl1.:.::ns~it Op.atlllg Reimb.Oper. Reimb. Cap. Collslruetion IRP C.phal Total Coat
General CoIXlSllI 3.663.9 <1.912.8 15.6 8.492... 602.7 830.6 1.433.3 9.925.7
General Manager 223.5 452.9 U 678.3 46.6 92.7 139.3 817.5
Mello Trilllsit Police 7.337.9 34,104.6 42,042.5 508.4 500.4 42.550.9
$11.225.3 139.970.4 $17.4 $51,213.1 $1.157.6 $923.4 $2,080.9 $53.294.1
Board and Executive Manallemenl Relations 140.6 296.4 0.8 437.8 19.0 45.6 64.6 502.4
AudItOr General 664.8 1.263.1 4.2 1,932.8 526.3 289.5 815.8 2.748.6
Secretlry - Chief of Sta'f 221.7 361.8 1.0 584.3 26.4 50.3 76.8 861.1
Pl'IlClIrement and Materiels 4.299.3 7.950.2 27.8 lUn.3 1,586.8 1,850.4 3.437.1 15.71U
Property oevelopment &Mllml 16.3 2.483.9 2,560.3 225.4 204.0 82.1 511.4 3.071.7
'nlelgOllemmentat ReLltiom 131.6 916.9 4.1 1.053.1 122.2 12.8 88.8 203.1 l.256.9
Secretary and Chief of Stall 15,534.4 $13,272.6 $38.5 518.845.5 52.506.0 5216.8 52,366.7 $5.109.5 $23.955.0
Industrial Cons1ructlon and ElNIronmeotal Safety 583.8 744.9 0.5 1,329.2 199.9 9.7 129.9 339.5 1.668.7
AGM - S)'$tllm SItely and Risk Protedlon -253.8 -37.5 1.0 -290,1 31.9 74.5 106.4 -183.7
QUIIIl)' Enhanalmem and AnBlysls 358.6 966.5 0.0 1.325.1 7.5 82.9 90.4 1.415.6
Passanger Vehide File Llo Safety 431.2 750.6 2.5 1.184.4 61.3 151.9 2132 1,397.8
Loss Control and WOrkelll Co mpens8lion 3.838.2 5.020.6 DO 8.858.9 567 11 57.8 8,916.7
System satelV and Risk Pl'llIeclion 54958.3 57.445.1 541 512.407.5 $357.3 $9.7 $440.3 $807.3 $13.214.8
Operallons $24,1n.1 570.553.9 $51.255.8 $151.966.6 5880.8 $440.3 $7.540.4 56.661.5 $160.&8.2
Bus Maintenance 99.110.7 4,ff1.6 103.222.3 2,5527 16U 335.3 3.052.4 106,274.6
clller Operating OfYIcer· Bus 117.0 219.9 08 337.6 19.9 49.8 69.7 407.4
Bus Transpertatlon 190.203.7 521.7 190.725.3 2,668.3 76.2 363.3 3.107.7 193,833.1
Bus Service 5289.431.4 $4.853.1 SO.8 5294.285.3 S522D.9 $260.5 $14Bot $6,229.8 $300.515.1
Rail Car Malnlenance 15.7 79.941.3 19,956.9 370&.7 445.4 1,299.2 2,119.3 82,076.3
Track and Structures 667.9 22,318.7 23,004.7 242.0 7.821.3 7,663.3 30,867.9
Rail Transportallon 74.7 104.466.0 1.6 104.542.4 1.120.7 128.3 1,119.1 185.3 2,553.4 107.095.7
clIior Opetll1lng OfYIcer - Rail 75.8 246.7 1.0 323.6 27.4 82.9 90.3 413,9
Rail S~lClms Malnlenance 5,744.5 69,264.9 26.1 75.035.3 419.7 826.6 6,014.2 7.060.6 82.095.9
RslIServlc:e $6,598.6 $278235.5 $28.7 $262.862.9 51495.4 $515.4 52.433.1 $15183.0 $19686.8 $302.549.7
BuS Vohiclo E/Vlneering 545.1 151.9 897.6 40.2 171.1 211.3 908.9
ChlBrEnolnller 73.0 129.8 0.3 203.1 12.5 27.9 40.5 243.8
EnwoMl/lntal Services 900.1 1.246.1 6.6 2,152.8 184.2 254.9 419.1 2.571.9
Systems Eralneerq 17.9 9192 997.1 32.2 497.7 529.9 1,527.0
Operation SUPPOR 5.559.0 52.799.2 37.4 58.395.8 12.4 427.1 301.9 741.4 59,137.0
Rail VeNdo Engineering 88.5 2,525.9 2.594,4 6.3 481.9 925.6 1,393.8 3.998.2
Re/labllly Engineering 342.9 2,283.0 0.1 2.826.0 342 134.4 168.5 2,794.8
Chief EnpinCllr $7.567.1 $60.055.1 54U $87866.9 $302.0 5BS8.9 52,313.5 S3.504.5 S71.171.1
Capital Projeds Ma!!!!lemenl S365.5 $2,809.4 $0,2 $3.175.1 524.521.7 $726.4 $8.032.2 $33,280.3 $36,455.4
Workforco Dewlopmcnt and DiwllitY Programs 55.406.9 $9.900.4 $51.4 $15.358.7 S1,0492 $1.904.6 $2,953.7 $18,312Jj
Communications $8.269.2 $14608.1 $2035 S23080.8 $192.3 $5.8 5614.9 $873.0 123,953.8
AGM - PImI'G and SIr81egic Progrllllls 1,009.5 528.6 22 1.540.3 56.5 136.8 193.3 1.733.7
Inrormatlon Tedmology and Servi:es 4.994.2 8.4<17.8 30.7 13.372.6 1.038.1 1.567.1 2,603.2 15.975.9
Busi'IeU Planning & Project Oowlopmenl 315.7 613.7 1.8 931.3 nu 116.0 892.9 1.824.2
Caplal Prograrnm,/V and OWllIigh1 -"8.6 8-42,0 2.9 1.293.5 254.7 192.0 446.8 1,740.2
Informaton Technology Renewal Program 49.5 51.1 1066 1.1 1.918.7 f.919.8 2,026.4
Planning and Strateoic Proorams $8,717.4 $10.489.4 537.5 $17.244.3 $2.125,4 $3.930.7 $6,056.1 523300.4
Tofl\tCOST 5377.515.0 5535.171.5 551.6967 59643llJ2 56.716.3 $34,719.7 $4.721.1 $45 m.9 $91,868.9 !h .056.252.3
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $495,041.9 $524,158.7 $561,314.5 $576,742.8 $599,602.7 $22,859.9
TOTAL FIVE YEAR COST COMPARISON $818,360.6 $865,287.3 $920.355.0 $969,657.7 $1,056,252.3 $86,594.6
22 Summary - DepaJ.1:mental.Budgets
Departments
By
Cost Center
General Counsel 27
Bus Operations 56
Rail Operations 60
Operations Engineering 66
Communications 87
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities • Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages {TotaO
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities {Total}
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (TotaQ
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Tolal)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities • Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full TIme Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Unknown (Total)
Unknown
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities {Total}
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operatar Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Properly
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities {Total}
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
EqUipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Total Operating
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Total Operating
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases '(Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Services (Total)
Management Fee
Professional & Technical
Temporary Help
COntract Maintenance
Custodial Services
Paratransit
Other
Utilities (Total) ,
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Services (Total)
Management Fee
Professional & Technical
Temporary Help
Contract Maintenance
Custodial Services
Paratransit
Other
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Miscellaneous (Total)
Dues And Subscriptions
Conferences and Meetings
Business Travel/Public Hrg
Interview & Relocation
Tolls
Advertising
Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Miscellaneous (Total)
Dues And Subscriptions
Conferences and Meetings
Business TravellPublic Hrg
Interview & Relocation
Tolls
Advertising
Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Miscellaneous (Total)
Dues And Subscriptions
Conferences and Meetings
Business Travel/Public Hrg
Interview & Relocation
Tolls
Advertising
Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Miscellaneous (Total)
Dues And Subscriptions
Conferences and Meetings
Business Travel/Public Hrg
Interview & Relocation
Tolls
Advertising
Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Services (Total)
Management Fee
Professional & Technical
Temporary Help
Contract Maintenance
Custodial Services
Paratranslt
Other
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Miscellaneous (Total)
Dues And Subscriptions
Conferences and Meetings
Business Travel/Public Hrg
Interview & Relocation
Tolls
Advertising
Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities • Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities • Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
EqUipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part TIme Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part TIme Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
EqUipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
EqUipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Total Operating
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Miscellaneous (Total)
Dues And Subscriptions
Conferences and Meetings
Business Travel/Public Hrg
Interview & Relocation
Tolls
Advertising
Other
Total Operating
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
EqUipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full TIme Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities· Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Utilities (Tolal)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Wages (Total)
Operator Wages
Full Time Wages
Part Time Wages
Temporary Wages
Wage Lapse
Overtime Wages
Services (Total)
Management Fee
Professional & Technical
Temporary Help
Contract Maintenance
Custodial Services
Paratransit
Other
Utilities (Total)
Electricity and Gas
Utilities - Other
Leases (Total)
Property
Vehicles
Equipment
Miscellaneous (Total)
Dues And SUbscriptions
Conferences and Meetings
Business Travel/Public Hrg
Interview & Relocation
Tolls
Advertising
Other
Reimbursements (Total)
Reimbursements
Where it Goes
Personnel $716.5
Other
$19.7
Fuell
Propulsion
$48.4
Materials Services
$63.5 $95.6
$ Millions
"'Excludes Debt Service and Reimbursable Operating Projects.
REVENUES
Passenger $458,945.8 $98,635.5 $356,310.3 $4,000.0
Other Passenger 4,250.0 2,920.0 1,330.0 0.0
Parking 31,806.2 0.0 31.806.2 0.0
Charter 1.176.3 1,176.3 0.0 0.0
Advertising 29,000.0 19.674.5 9,325.5 0.0
Joint Development 6.219.9 0.0 6,219.9 0.0
Other 2.510.6 1,478.8 1,031.8 0.0
Employee Parking 140.0 70.0 70.0 0.0
Interest 420.0 263.6 156.2 0.0
Fiber Optics 7.000.0 0.0 7.000.0 0.0
EXPENSES
Personnel $716,563.3 $312,458.0 $402,912.7 $1.192.6
Services 95.609.1 12.791.5 32,690.8 50.126.8
Materials & Supplies 63,445.4 26,114.3 37,303.2 27.9
Fuel &Propulsion Power 48,401.5 15,374.8 33,026.7 0.0
Utilities 25,167.0 4.286.6 20,811.6 66.8
Casualty & Liability 9,281.3 3.325.3 5,955.9 0.0
Leases & Rentals 4,531.5 1,607.2 2,670.7 253.6
Miscellaneous 1,384.2 1,557.2 -200.1 27.1
Preventive Maintenance -20,700.0 -18,000.0 -2,700.0 0.0
EXPENSES
BUS OPERATIONS $310,636.7 $320,313.0 $333,264.3 $359,515.0 $26,250.7
RAIL OPERATIONS 446,849.1 468,229.0 498,963.2 532,471.5 33,508.3
PARATRANSIT 26,245.8 34,467.4 40,068.8 51,696.7 11,627.9
EXPENSES
Personnel $601,222.6 $639,103.6 $666,853.6 $716.563.3 $49,709.7
Services 70.098.1 74.920.6 83,254.3 95.609.1 12,354.8
Materials & Supplies 61.700.2 56,348.2 58,878.3 63.445.4 4,567.0
Fuel & Propulsion Power 37,122.9 39,420.4 44,641.1 48,401.5 3.760.4
Utilities 20.158.8 23.036.2 23,249.9 25.167.0 1,917.2
Casualty & Liability 5.408.6 3,027.5 7,679.2 9,281.3 1.602.1
Leases & Rentals 4,443.5 4.595.8 4,325.9 4.531.5 205.6
Miscellaneous 2,276.9 1,057.2 1,413.9 1.384.2 -29.7
Preventive Maintenance -18,700.0 -18,500.0 -18.000.0 -20,700.0 -2,700.0
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $448,299.2 $476,599.6 $504,379.9 $522.207.8 $536,116.9 $13,909.1
Wages (Total 1 $410.117.6 5190,114,3 5198,014.8 512.8 54.090.6 $812.9 $1.794.1 $15,278.1
Operalor Vtlages 194.807.0 126.6501 63,467.8 0.0 1,725.6 57.5 5655 3404
Full TIme Wages 205.266.7 59,470.9 131,289.5 12.6 1.387.3 336.1 1,144.8 11,623.6
Part Time Waoes 210.5 122.6 67.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tempolilry Wages 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 00
Wage Lapse -8,647.9 -2.426.1 -5,560.9 -1.0 ·50.6 -25.9 -46.2 -537.3
Overtime Wages 18,4812 4.296.6 8.730.5 1.2 1.028.3 443.2 130.0 3.8514
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $599.6027 5233,442.5 5301,774.8 5899.7 $4,317.1 $23.991.0 $3,085.9 $32.091 a
Fringes (Tolall $200,928.3 579,015.6 S101,137.9 $2929 S1.165.6 $7,828.6 51,002.5 $10,4852
Fringe Benefits 194,089.6 75.623.5 07.786.9 291.5 1,165.6 7,793.9 1,002.5 10,425.7
Olher Fringe Benents 3,140.7 1.482.6 1,562.5 1.4 0.0 347 0.0 59.5
Workers Compensalen 3,698.0 1,909.5 1,788.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TOTAL PERSONNEL COST $800,531.0 $312,458.0 5402,912.7 51,192.6 $5 482.7 S31,8196 $4,088.4 $42577.0
Services (T01a1) $98,819.4 $12.791.5 $32,690.6 $50,126.8 $0.0 $1,797.7 $74.0 $1.338.5
ManagElllElnl Fee 2,721.0 0.0 2.721.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Professional &Technical 12,561.1 4,207.8 7,198.9 1215 0.0 430.7 10.7 611.6
Temporary Hap 1,203.5 212.7 885.6 11.8 0.0 46.1 7.2 40.1
Contract Mainlenan:;e 20,310,0 4,350.1 15.250.2 48.4 0.0 570.2 28.1 63.0
Custodial SaMces 12.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 00 7.7 2.8 1.4
Paraltanslt 49,849.0 0.0 0.0 49,849.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 12.142.2 4,020.9 6,634.5 95.9 0.0 743.1 25.3 622.4
Materials & SuppBes (Tolal) $65,837.4 526,114.3 $37.303.2 527.9 59412 $620.9 $104.5 5725.4
Fuel and Lub~canlS 2,622.3 1,732.8 858.7 0.0 0.0 18.6 9.8 2.4
Tires 2,691.8 2,281.4 87.8 0.0 322.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Olher 60,523.3 22,100.1 36,356.7 27.9 618.6 602.3 94.7 723.1
Fuel & Propulsion (Tolal) $48,858.5 $15,374.8 533,026.7 SOO 5292.4 $0.0 $164.6 $0.0
Diesel Fuel 13.154.6 12,862.2 0.0 0.0 292.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
PropulsiOn Power 33,191.3 0.0 33,026.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 164.6 0.0
Clean NalJral Gas 2,512.6 2.512.6 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 DO
UllUlies (Total) $25,844.1 S4,286.6 520,811.8 568.8 SO.O S35.4 5264.7 $378.9
ElectriCity and Gas 19,213.0 2.584.2 16,126.0 36.5 0.0 3.8 259.9 2027
UWilles - Other 6,6311 1.702.4 4,685.7 32.3 0.0 31.7 4.8 174.3
Casualtv & LiabiitV (TOlal) $9.5124 $3,325.3 $5,955.9 $0.0 $0.0 52.2 $1.8 $227.1
Insurance 7,910,3 1,963.9 5.715.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 1.8 227.1
Claims 1.602.1 1,3614 240.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0
Leases (Tolal) $4.778.2 $1.6072 52.670.7 $253.6 $0.0 $89.2 $0.0 $157.5
Property 1.657.1 673.5 481.9 250.8 0.0 19.4 0.0 31.7
Vehicles 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Equlpmenl 3,121.0 733.6 2,188.8 2.8 00 69.8 0.0 125.8
Miscellaneous (Total} $5,102.7 $1,632.1 $2,756.5 $27.1 $0.0 $354.1 $23.0 $309.4
Dues And Subscriptions 634.6 190.0 343.7 1.6 0.0 46.7 3.5 49.0
Conferences and Meelings 589.9 1766 285.2 9.9 0.0 49.8 2.0 68.5
Business TraveVPublic Hrg 686.1 123.8 323.0 2.9 0.0 137.3 12.4 86.7
InteIVlew & Relocalbn 586.0 1752 276.1 1.3 0.0 54.6 0.7 78.1
Tolls 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Advertising 1.800.9 715.4 I,OB5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 6051 251.0 442.9 11.4 0.0 66.3 4.4 290
Reimbursements (Total) -$3.031.4 -$74.8 ·52,956,8 SO.O $0.0 SO.O SO.O $0.1
RelmbursemenlS -3,031.4 -74.8 -2,956.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
TOTAL NONPERSONNELCOST 5255,121.1 $65,057.0 $132,258.6 $50.504.1 $1233.6 $2.900.1 5632.6 $3.134.9
TOTAL COST $1.056,252.1 5377,515.0 $535,171.3 S51696.7 $6.716.3 534.719.7 $4.721.1 $45,711.9
Total approved operating revenues for Fiscal 2005, is $541.5 million. This is
comprised of $458.9 million in passenger revenue and $82.6 million in non-
passenger revenue. This represents an increase of $54.2 million or 11.1 percent
over the Fiscal 2004 Approved Budget of $487.3 million.
For Fiscal 2005, system-wide fare changes were implemented which are
estimated to increase passenger revenues by $23.5 million. An increase in
parking fees is expected to generate an additional $5.7 million, making the total
fare package for Fiscal 2005 $29.2 million. A summary of the Fiscal 2005 Fare
Adjustments approved by the Board is included on page 116.
I. PASSENGER REVENUES
Passenger Revenue
($ in 1,000s)
The total District of Columbia School Subsidy for Fiscal 2005 is $4.2 million, $2.9
million for Metrobus and $1.3 million for Metrorail, $1.0 million more than in Fiscal
2004.
III. PARKING
The Fiscal 2005 revenue budget for parking at Metrorail stations is $31.8 million;
$10.5 million more than budgeted for Fiscal 2004. The elements of the fare
increase outlined on page 116 provide for an increase in the parking fee of $0.75,
along with a $10.00 increase in the monthly reserved parking fee from $35.00 to
$45.00. These two parking initiatives are expected to generate additional
revenue in Fiscal 2005 of $5.7 million. In addition to a parking rate increase,
implementation of extended collection hours in Fiscal 2005 will generate
additional parking revenue.
Additional revenue will also be generated in Fiscal 2005 from the opening of
several new parking lots and garages. By the third quarter of the year, the total
available park and ride spaces will increase to 53,547, an increase of almost
4,000 spaces or almost 8 percent over Fiscal 2004. These increases come
primarily from three new facilities: new parking structure at Grosvenor, as well as
parking facilities Morgan Blvd. and Largo Town Center on the blue line extension.
All revenue generated from parking operations, $31.8 million in Fiscal 2005, is
attributed to Metrorail.
IV. ADVERTISING
The Fiscal 2005 advertising revenue is expected to be $29 million. Of the total,
$16.7 million is generated by advertising on Metrobus, and $9.3 million on
Metrorail. This reflects the amount in the Minimum Annual Guarantee between
WMATA and the contractor. This contract is in effect until Fiscal 2010.
The Fiscal 2005 Joint Development revenue estimate of $6.2 million is $2 million
more than the Fiscal 2004 budget and is applied entirely to Metrorail. The $2
million increase above the total for Fiscal 2004 is TIIF funds that will be used to
offset budgeted joint development activities. Included in this category are long-
term leases of WMATA property and air rights for property adjacent to rail
stations.
Initiated in September 1986, the WMATA Fiber Optic Program was designed to
allow for the installation, operation and maintenance of a fiber optic-based
telecommunication network utilizing the excess capacity within the WMATA right-
of-way. As part of the compensation package, WMATA receives, in a separate
fiber optic cable, a number of fibers for its own use. In Fiscal 2005, fiber optic
revenue is expected to be $7.0 million.
Other revenue included in the Fiscal 2005 budget are vending, pay telephones,
cellular telephones, bike programs, charter/contract revenues, and JGB
employee parking fees.
METRORAIL
Passenger $284,054.2 $292,800.8 $329,619.6 $356,310.3 $26,690.8
Other Passenger 857.0 1.971.0 1,000.0 1,330.0 $330.0
Parking 12,156.9 13,039.0 21,306.2 31,806.2 $10,500.0
Advertising 5,658.0 6,912.6 7,545.5 9.325.5 $1,780.0
Joint Development 5,786.2 5,491.7 4,219.9 6,219.9 $2,000.0
Other 1,798.4 2.692.1 1,534.4 1,031.8 -$502.7
Employee Parking 65.1 66.7 70.0 70.0
Interest -220.4 77.4 684.5 156.2 -$528.3
Fiber Optics 6,749.9 7,608.9 2,500.0 7,000.0 $4,500.0
METRO ACCESS
Passenger $1,698.2 $1,927.8 $2,329.6 $4,000.0 $1,670.3
TOTAL
Passenger $374,881.2 $383,267.3 $426,905.1 $458,945.8 $32,040.7
Other Passenger 3,051.1 3,461.4 3,250.0 4,250.0 $1,000.0
Parking 12,156.9 13,039.0 21,306.2 31,806.2 $10,500.0
Charter 1,258.6 1,658.9 1,176.3 1,176.3
Advertising 20,009.9 23,013.2 23,200.0 29,000.0 $5,800.0
Joint Development 5,786.2 5,491.7 4,2'19.9 6,219.9 $2,000.0
Other 3,085.9 4,478.7 2,710.6 2,510.6 -$200.0
Employee Parking 125.2 133.4 140.0 140.0
Interest 645.0 1,015.5 1,890.2 420.0 -$1,470.2
Fiber Optics 6,749.9 7,608.9 2,500.0 7,000.0 $4,500.0
Increase fare from $2.40 by $0.10 to $2.50. double the bus boarding charge $0.1
Charge supplemental fare for sef'.1ce beyon 3/4 mile fixed-route $0.4
Offer free transit on Metrorail and Metrobus to a companion of MetroAccess ADA eligible
persons
Retain Metrobus fares at one-half the boarding charge. rounded down to the nearest $0.05
Retain fares at one-half the peak period tare all day. max fare on Metrorail not to exceed one-
half the max fare, rounded down to the nearest $0.05.
Subtotal $29.2
FARECARDS METROACCESS
$2.50
$10.00 Senior-Disabled
PARKING FEES
Daily
$4.00 Montgomery Co.(except $3.25 at Wheaton)
$3.50 Prince Georges Co.
$3.50 District of Columbia (except $2.5 at Minnesota Av)
$3.75 Virginia
Revenues $124.2
Where it Goes
Materials & Other $18.8 Fuel $15.4
Services $12.8
Personnel $312.5
$ Millions
REVENUES
Passenger $ 89,128.8 $88,538.7 $95,050.5 $98,635.5 $3,585.0
Other Passenger 2,194.1 1,490.3 2,250.0 2,920.0 670.0
Parking
Charter 1,258.6 1,658.9 1,176.3 1,176.3 0.0
Advertisi ng 14,351.9 16,100.6 15,654.5 19,674.5 4,020.0
Other 2,152.9 2,724.7 2,379.0 1,742.6 -636.4
Employee Parking 60.1 66.7 70.0 70.0 0.0
EXPENSES
Personnel $264,395.5 $277,323.5 $289,252.7 $312,458.0 $ 23,205.3
Services 14,664.7 13,378.3 12,060.3 12,791.5 731.2
Materials & Supplies 28,335.0 25,294.8 25,694.2 26,114.3 420.1
Fuel & Propulsion Power 10,432.6 12,280.8 14,551.4 15,374.8 823.4
Utilities 3,839.4 5,032.8 4,122.3 4,286.6 164.3
Casualty & Liability 2,932.0 1,227.0 2,313.9 3,325.3 1,011.4
Leases & Rentals 1,762.0 1,780.6 1,557.7 1,607.2 49.5
Miscellaneous 2,275.1 1,995.2 1,711.9 1,557.2 -154.7
Preventive Maintenance -18,000.0 -18,000.0 -18,000.0 -18,000.0 0.0
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $198,420.5 $209,204.9 $219,106.1 $227,168.0 $233,442.5 56,274.4
Scheduled (budget) Bus Miles (OOOs) 44,573 46.478 50,917 48.763 47.639
Bus Fleet Size (Year End) 1A30 1.442 1.463 1.451 1.421
Total Operating Net Expenses (ODDs) $297.589 $328.637 $320.313 $333,264 $359.515
RATIOS:
Operating Cost Per Total Bus Mile 6.61 6.78 6.27 6.67 7.36
0
~
G PassengemPerBus 101.78 102.48 101.08 103.10 104.60
;c-+
Passengers Per Scheduled Bus Mile 3.27 3.18 2.90 3.07 3.-12
S·
OQ
Operating Cost Per Passenger $2.04 $2.22 $2.17 $2.23 $2.42
t:I:'
s=
0.. Operating Subsidy Per Passenger $1.28 $1.49 $1.42 $1.45 $1.58
(JQ
G
f"""fo
* ... Average Passenger Fare $0.64 $0.62 $0.61 $0.65 $0.66
I
~
(U
Percentage of Operating Cost Recovered from Passenger Revenues 31.3 Qk 21.80/0 28.10/0 29.20/0 27.40/0
r::t
0 Percentage of Operating Cost Recovered from aU Operating Revenues 37.2°,'a 33.2% 34.50/0 35.0% 34.60/0
~
s::
r:IJ
FISCAL 2005
ACTIVE BUS FLEET
MAXIMUM
SCHEDULED TOTAL ACTIVE
FLEET FLEET
Fiscal 2003 End of Year (Actual) 1.198 1A21
-FY 04 Misc. Service Adjustments
Fiscal 2005 End of Year 1,198 1,421
AVERAGE AGE
END OF FISCAL YEAR 2005
NUMBER OF AVERAGE
MANUFACTURER YEAR BUSES AGE
METRO FLXIBLE 1986 47 18
METRO FLXIBlE 1987 54 17
METRO FLXIBLE 1988 60 16
METRO FLXIBLE 1989 171 15
METRO FLXIBLE 1990 35 14
ORION 1992 59 12
METRO FLXIBLE 1993 84 11
METRO FLXIBLE 1994 139 10
IKARUS 1995 43 9
ORION (IV) 1997 263 7
ORION (II) 1999 40 5
ORION (II) 2000 2 4
ORION V) 2000 132 4
ORION (VI) 2000 99 4
New (TAGS) 2001 4 3
NEWCNG 2002 164 2
NEOPLAN 2003 21 1
Thomas 2004 ~ 1
TOTAL 1,421 8.5
FY 2004 FY 2005
APPROVED APPROVED
Total Scheduled 48,762,832 47,639.304
UNSCHEDULED HOURS
GUARANTEE· 47.864 47,864
STRATEGIC* 79.253 79,253
OVERTIME/EXTRA SERVICE* 683,502 130.750 117,185
UTILITY 139,202 111,411 112.786
STANDING EXTRA 30.894 34.708 33,501
SUBCONTRACT CHARTER 29.182 22.700 27,000
MISCELLANEOUS 49,491 61.325 53.704
TRAININGIINSTRUCTION 121,426 206.967 156,125
SUBTOTA~UNSCHEDULED 1,053,697 694,978 627,418
This splitting of the Metrobus route system into regional and non-regional routes
leads to an allocation of Metrobus operating costs into these same categories.
The fiscal 2005 budget for Metrobus operating expenses (excluding
demonstration and reimbursable bus service) is proposed at $359.5 million,
which represents the base of costs to be allocated between the categories of
regional and non-regional. A marginal cost analysis has been completed
whereby those Metrobus costs associated with the production of regional service
have been identified and segregated into a regional classification. The remaining
costs are therefore, by definition, non-regional.
To measure costs on a unit basis, platform hours are divided into the regional
and non-regional costs. Platform hours are measured from the time a bus leaves
a garage until it returns to a garage, and are associated with trips that are regular
(in-service) trips and non-revenue (deadhead) trips. The following table identifies
the unit costs for bus service as proposed in the fiscal 2005 budget.
Note: Figures do not contain platform hours or bUdgeted costs for demonstration and/or
reimbursable bus service.
REGIONAL ROUTES
NON·REGIONAL ROUTES
REGIONAL ROUTES
NON·REGIONAL ROUTES
REGIONAL ROUTES
NON·REGIONAL ROUTES
EXPENSES
Personnel $742.2 $976.7 $752.2 $774.8 $22.6
Services $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Materials & Supplies $44.4 $53.5 $45.7 $55.1 $9.4
Fuel & Propulsion Power $24.9 $28.2 $25.7 $37.0 $11.3
Utilities $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Casualty & Liability $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Lease & Rentals $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Miscellaneous $0.5 $0.4 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Where it Goes
Other $26.6
Propulsion $33.0
Materials $37.3
Services $32.7
$ Millions
EXPENSES
Personnel $314,055.3 $336,193.7 $360.830.3 $376,368.1 $402,912.7 $26,544.6
Services 20,761.6 30.015.6 28,357.1 32,264.7 32,690.8 426.2
Materials & Supplies 32,753.0 33.312.5 30.984.7 33.321.5 37,303.2 3,981.7
Fuel & Propulsion Power 27,216.9 26.690.2 27,139.6 30,089.6 33,026.7 2,937.1
Utilities 17,257.3 16.319.4 17,995.4 19,379.8 20,811.6 1,431.9
Casualty & Liability 3,137.1 2,476.6 1,782.0 5,365.3 5,955.9 590.6
Leases & Rentals 1,964.7 2,561.1 2,595.0 2,581.0 2,670.7 89.7
Miscellaneous -33.5 -20.1 -955.1 -442.9 -200.1 242.8
Preventive Maintenance ·1,400.4 -700.0 -500.0 0.0 -2.700.0 ·2,700.0
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $249,426.1 $266,884.1 $284,521.1 $294,047.2 $301.774.8 $7,727.6
STATISTICS:
Total Railcar Miles (0005) 50.394 51.298 56.399 57,200 58.683 65.091 65.892
Revenue Railcar Miles (OOOs) 48,794 49.698 54.799 55.800 56,470 63.491 64,292
Total Passengers (OOOs) 155.103 163.274 177.268 180,573 184.364 189.200 193.851
Total Passenger Revenue (OOOs) $247.992 $256.833 $276.639 $284.911 $292.801 $329.620 $356.310
otal Operating Revenue (OOOs) $273.629 $283.927 $308,246 $316.905 $330.660 $368,480 $413.250
olal Operating Net Expense (OOOS) $367.470 $392,056 $415,712 $446,849.1 $468.229 $498,927 $532.472
Total Operating Assistance (0005) $93.841 $108.129 $107.466 $129.944 $137.569 $130,447 $119.222
RATIOS:
~
CD
Passengers Per Revenue Railcar Mile 3.18 3.29 3.23 3.24 3.26 2.98 3.02
.....
e1.
Er Operating Cost Per Total Railcar Mile
(JQ
$7.29 $7.64 $7.37 $7.81 $7.98 $7.67 $8.08
tt1 Operating Cost Per Passenger $2.37 $2.40 $2.35 $2.47 $2.54 $2.64 $2.75
6.
(JQ
(1)
Operaling Subsidy Per Passenger $0.61 $0.66 $0.61 $0.72 $0.75 $0.69 $0.62
"'I
~
n
verage Passenger Fare $1.60 $1.57 $1.56 $1.58 $1.59 $1.74 $1.84
~
0
;;J Percentage of Operating Cost Recovered from Passenger Revenues
..... 67.5% 65.50/0 66.5°/0 63.8% 62.5% 66.1% 66.9%
.....
Percentage of Operating Cost Recovered from all Operating Revenues 74.5% 72.4% 74.1°/0 70.9% 70.6% 73.9% 77.6%
PAYHOURS
RAil OPERATORS AND STATION MANAGERS
FISCAL 2005
Rail Lines 2002 ACTUAL 2003 ACTUAL 2004 APPROVED FY 20015 APPROVED
Red Line Glenmont/Shady Grove Glenmont/Shady Grove Glenmont/Shady Grove Glenmont/Shady Grove
Silver Spring/Grosvenor Silver Spring/Grosvenor Silver Spring/Grosvenor Silver Spring/Grosvenor
Orange Line New CarrolltonNienna New CarrolllonNienna New CarrolnonNienna New CarrolltonNienna
Yellow Line Huntlng1on/Mt. Vernon Huntington/Mt. Vernon Huntington/Mt. Vernon Hunting1on/Mt. Vemon
Square Square Square Square
Green Line Greenbelt/Branch Ave. Greenbelt/Branch Ave, Greenbelt/Branch Ave. Greenbelt/Branch Ave.
Gap 6 7 7 4
Start-up 1 1 1 1
Gap 36 36 36 16
Start-up 4 4 4 4
Ridership Pattern
Ridership Pattern
Adjustment-Fiscal 2002 10 10 10 10
HOURS OF OPERATION
Weekday 18.5 16.5 18.5 19
Saturday 18 18 18 20
Sunday 16 16 16 17
DAYS OF OPERAnON
Weekday 250 251 252 251
Saturday 57 57 57 60
Sunday 58 57 57 54
(AI During Peak Tourtst Season. 6.Car consists lIIilized on Red Line (Shady Grove-Wheaton). Orsnge Line, Grelln Line.
Montgomerv County
Grosvenor (1) 1,568 $4.00 $2.50 $1.50
White Flint 1,158 $4.00 $2.50 $1.50
Twinbrook 1,097 $4.00 $2.50 $1.50
Rockville 524 $4.00 $2.50 $1.50
Shady Grove 5,467 $4.00 $2.50 $1.50
Glenmont 1,781 $4.00 $2.50 $1.50
Wheaton 977 $3.25 $1.75 $1.50
Forest Glen 596 $4.00 $2.50 $1.50
District of Columbia
Deanwood 194 53.50 $2.00 $1.50
Minnesota Avenue 333 52.50 $2.00 50.50
Rhode Island Avenue 340 53.50 $2.00 $1.50
Fort Totten 408 $3.50 $2.00 $1.50
Anacostia BOB $3.50 $2.00 $1.50
Northern Virginia
Huntington. N 1,281 53.75 $2.50 $1.25
Huntington. S 1,809 $3.75 $2.75 $1.00
West Falls Church 714 $3.75 $2.50 $1.25
Dunn Loring 1,319 53.75 $2.50 $1.25
Vienna 5,849 $3.75 $2.50 51.25
Franconia-Springfield 5,069 $3.75 $2.50 $1.25
Van Dam Street 361 53.75 $2.75 $0.50 SO.50
East Falls Church 422 $3.75 $2.75 $1.00
Grand Totals
1. Capacilywas increased from 312. which explains unusually low average paid fransacllons.
2. Largo Town Center and Morgan are new parking 1015.
·r
0',
METROACCESS STATISTICS
For the Fiscal Year 2000 Through 2005
STATISTICS:
Total Number of
Registrants 15,603 17,109 13,920 12,835 12,826 14,000
Total Registrant
Trip Requested 784,975 940,759 1,238,778 1,629,241 1.757,567 2,340,850
Contract Carrier
Number of
Vehicles 80 138 176 176 176 176
Trips Transmitted
to Core Carriers 124,091 9,624 0 0 0 0
Trips Completed
by Contract
Carriers 452,924 557,397 738,284 972,425 1,112,358 1,474,700
Revenues $4.0
Where it Goes
Services $50.1
$ Millions
EXPENSES
Personnel $633.0 $949.8 $1,181.5 $1.192,6 $11,0
Services 25,417.8 33,185.1 38,539.6 50.126,8 11,587.2
Materials & Supplies 52.7 68.7 42.0 27.9 ·14.1
Fuel & Propulsion Power 0.0 -0,1 0,1 0.0 -0.1
Utilities 0.0 8.0 62.8 68.8 6.0
Casualty & Liability 0.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Leases & Rentals 120.4 220.2 204.5 253.6 49.1
Miscellaneous 21.9 17.1 38.3 27,1 -11.3
FY 2001 Actual EX 2002 Actual FY 2003 Actyal EY 2004 Approved fY 2005 Approved ~
Salaries (Total) $452.0 $496.2 $690.2 $912.4 $886.9 -$25.5
Full-Time Salaries 437.7 475.5 679.6 920.7 906.2 -14.5
Temporary Salaries 0.6 0.6 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Part Time Salaries 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.6 1.5
Salary Lapse 0.0 0.0 0.0 -9.2 -21.6 -12.4
Overtime Salaries 13.7 20.2 6.5 0.9 0.8 -0.1
TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES $452.6 $510.6 $752.8 $929.3 $899.7 -$29.6
Materials & Supplies (Total) $18.7 $52.7 $68.7 $42.0 $27.9 -$14.1
fuel and Lubricants 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tires 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 18.7 52.7 68.3 42.0 27.9 -14.1
Fuel & Propulsion (Total) $0.0 $0.0 -SO.1 $0.1 $0.0 -$0.1
Diesel Fuel 0.0 0.0 -0.1 0.1 0.0 -0,1
Propulsion Power 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Clean Natural Gas 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Casualty & Liability {T01al) $0.0 $0.0 $18.5 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0
Insurance 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Claims 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
[B] INDIRECT COST: $68,538.1 $0.0 $8,855.3 $5,647.8 $0.0 $14,503.2 $83,04'1.3
(j
orn Subtotal for operating $943,683.2
r-+
Debt Service $27,484.2 $27,484.2
TOTAL COST: $971,167.4 $6,716.3 $426,344.0 $271,230.0 $26,912.0 $724,486.0 $1,702,369.7
In October 2003, the Authority issued $163,495,000 of Gross Revenue Transit Refunding
Bonds, Series-2003, to refund the non-callable portion of the Authority's outstanding Gross
Revenue Transit Refunding Bonds, Series-1993. The final maturity for the 1993 bonds is
FY2011 and FY2014 for the 2003 bonds. The annual jurisdictionaf debt service payment on
these two bond series is $27,484,194.
In November 2003, the Authority issued $35,640,000 of Gross Revenue Transit Bonds, Series
2003-8. The bonds provide for semi-annual payments of interest and annual principal
payments, with final maturity in FY2011. Annual debt service is approximately $6 million, to be
paid from passenger fares. The proceeds of the bonds were used to accelerate the vertical
transportation modernization program. The vertical transportation modernization program is an
integral part of the Authority's Capital Improvement Program designed to provide for system-
wide escalator maintenance, escalator rehabilitation and elevator rehabilitation. The tenns of
the· new bond issuances are set forth in the Gross Revenue Transit Bond Refunding Resolution
and Official Statement and the Gross Revenue Transit Bond Resolution and Official Statement.
Series 2003
Due to Bondholders 7/1/2004 $7 730,000
1 $4,741.545 $12.471,545
Due to Bondholders 1/1/2005 9,100,000 3,373.806 12,473 806
1
Gross Revenue Transit Refunding Bonds Gross Revenue Transit Bonds (Elevator and Escalator
::s
(JQ
COUN
Special litigation·outside counsel $600.0 $1.155.8 $1.065.2 $90.6 Outside counsel supporting joint development projects and additionallitigalion.
OJ Eng.JArch. consultants $21.9 $21.9 $18.6 $3.3 Adjudication of contract disputes, Army Corps of
~ Engineers Board of Contract Appeals.
Q.. Employment/training $44.5 $24.5 $17.8 $6.7 Continuing legal education requirments for COUN attorneys.
(JQ
S1 Witness & court fees $321.5 $325.0 $275.9 $49.1 Court expenses (court reporting. witnesses, elc.).
I Other consultants 5258.0 $101.1 $82.1 $19.0 Claim expenses (IMEs. vehicular appraisals. etc.)
SAFE
~
a~ EmploymenUlraining
Claims adjusters
$19.8
$1.458.0
$19.8
$2.658.0
$18.1
$2.658.0
$1.7 Certification maintenance & Professional development.
WOrkel's Compensation ALAE. claims adjusters. Risk Management
Information System.
....en
rn
0
Other consultants
MTPD
$146.4 $146.4 $137.5 58.9 Safely consulting services on as needed basis.
~
""0
n
ACCT
EmploymenVtraining $25.0 $21.3 $3.7 Business systems.
e. Computer Consunants
RMA
$75.0 $16.6 $5.3 $11.3 Data warehousing tor financial reports.
(/}
CD Employment/training $3.6 $13.0 $12.5 SO.5 Enhancing staff's database management and querying skiUs.
~
..... Computer consultants $116.4 $145.3 $80.5 $64.8 Budget system maintenance selVfce and preparation for PeopleSoft conversion.
n TRES
CD Employment/training $10.4 $10.4 Business systems.
en
Investment consullanls $119.0 $43.0 $25.0 $18.0 Financial advisor.
OPER
Transportation consultants $44.3 $44.2 $37.6 $6.7 RaiiIBus. Vertide Transportalion and MetroAccess performance analyses.
OPAS
Employee training $156.9 $465.4 $465.4 SCarce skilled technical train;ng. FYOS focus on BMNT and PlNT.
Transportalion consultants $45.6 $45.6 $45.6 GIS Data Consulting for Bus Announcements System.
ADAP
Other consultants $93.5 $93.5 $93.5 Deveklping travel training programs for students.
BUSV
Other consultants $24.8 524.8 $21.1 $3.7 BMNT Maintenance performance analyses.
STRA
Employee Training 516.0 $16.0 $16.0 Outside supervisory management training.
Other consultants $4.0
BMNT
Emptoyee Training $20.0 $20.0 Outside supervisory management training.
ENGA
I-oto
Employee Training $30.3 $3.9 $26.4 Specialized training for staff development.
-....J VENG
,....... Corrosion Control Testing and Prevention.
Eng.lArch. consultants $240.8 5240.8 $240.8
ENSP
EngJArch. consultants $383.4 $333.5 $333.5 Adjacent con5truction engineering evaluations and technical procedure evaluation.
Other consultants $67.9 $62.9 $62.9 Utility (PEPCO) rate case work.
BENG
Eng.lArch. consultants $142.4 $142.4 $142.4 Engineering support for integration and applicatif.v , d new bus technology.
Provide 1echnical & engineering support ror allell" . ~ tuellemiss'ons progralns.
...... WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
""-.1 PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICE CONTRACTS
tv
FISCAL 2005 APPROVED BUDGET
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
FSVC
Employee Training $16.0 Specialized training for staff development.
Other consultants
CAPM
Employee Training $50,4 520.1 $20.1 Engineering & Survey start training. cl"iVsurvey design. COrR training.
certification courses, etc.
WDDP
Other consultants $271.3 $230.0 $197.3 $32.7 Technical Assistance for labor contracts and on·9Oing benefils cost containment.
APAS
Employee Training/Development $5.0 $4.7 $0.3 Specialized training fot staff development
Other consultants $31.8 $31.8 Asset Management System training and technicat support for integration with
0 PeopteSoft JGB interior design consuning services.
~
..,CD HRMP
a Other consultants $424.0 $423.9 $359.9 564.0 Market based salary reviews/surveys. PC based system for
OQ
::r Medical consuttants $429.9 $429.9 $365.0 $64.9
performance and rewards integrated solutions.
Two onsite physicians. off site physician to perfonn on OSHA
t:Jj surveillance program, psychiatric sel'\l'ices for new MTPD.
s= CIVR
Q. Employee Training/Development $4.0 $3.4 $0.6 Training
OQ
CD Other consultants $170.7 $120.2 $104.3 $15.9 Technical assistance to D8E. Affirmative Action program and
r-+
Diversity program.
I LABR
.-c
a Witness & Court Fees
Other consultants $603.8
$70.0
$796.0
$57.6
$688.6
$12.4
$107.4
Witness and Court Services
legal advice on judicial and arbitral decisions. contract negotiation, pension.
~
en health & welfare. collective bargaining agreements. grievances.
til
""",".
ODEV
0 EmproymenVtraining $1.425.5 $1.218.1 $1.003.6 $214.5 Mandated programs (diversity, sexual harassment. customer service. etc.)
1=l
e. Career Dev.lnformation Technologv.leadership Training. National Transit
Database, Succession Planning
~
::s Computer service consultants $409.6 $672.0 $609.5 $62.5 Maintaining database application & building ancillary applications.
0. Other Consultants $200.0 CuUure change initiative work and employee survey.
~ MKTG
0 Transportation consultants $325.5 $325.5 5325.5 Customer environment sUNey~ Public perceptions
(')
5,...,.
(")
Other consultants $185.0 $185.0 $185.0
of transit tracking study.
Customer satisfaction measurement research.
SECT
~
...- Accl.lAudit. consultants $200.0 $276.0 $245.8 $30.2 External management auditing service for tile Board of Directors.
rn
(I)
BEMR
Computer Service Consultants $40.0 $40.0 Implementation of Oocumenturn software for copying and arChiving agreements
:!....... LAND
(")
(1) Real estale consultants $195.0 $195.0 $195.0 Joint development. appraisar. survey. marketing.
en PLSP
Employee Training/Development $21.0 $17.8 $3.2 Specialized training for staff development
PRMT
Computer Consultants $54.3 $54.3 $46.1 $8.2 Supporting PIMS system.
Other consultants Quarlty control program for quality checks on inventory.
GOVR
Olher consultants $175.0 $257.5 $257.5 Government legislative consultants.
PLNG
Transportation consultants $289.5 $43.7 $36.4 $7.3 Paralransit demand forecasting; Regional Mobility Initiative
Other consultants $45.0 $6.8 $5.7 $1.1 Paratransit demand forecasting; Regional Mobility InitiaUve
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICE CONTRACTS
FISCAL 2005 APPROVED BUDGET
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
ITSV
Employee Training $172.9 $172.9 $146.8 $26.1 Technical tJaining for new techoo[ogy & new infrastructure to
support RCSC & ITRP system.
Computer service consultants $445.3 $445.3 $378.1 $67.2 Specialist support basic ordering agreement.
MACS
Other consultants $16.0 $11.6 $11.6 Annual study on Paratransit demand: implications on FY06 Budget.
MREL
Employment/training $1.0 Media training for seniur staff used on as needed basis.
The fiscal 2005 budget contains 10,294 authorized positions of which 85%1 or 8,754 are
members of the five union locals on the property t representing employees loosely
categorized by job function. Two of these locals represent the hourly wage work force, one
local represents a portion of the professional and administrative work force, and two other
locals cover the police and security positions. The remaining classifications of
administrative and management employees are not covered by union contracts.
The following terms are widely used to describe the various unions and employees at
WMATA:
FY 2005
Union Category Positions Distribution
Local 689 . . . . . . . . . . . .. 7,207 . . . . . . . . . .70.010/0
Local 922 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352. . . . . . . . .. 3.420/0
Union Wage Subtotal .. 7,559 . . . . . . . .. 73.43%
"
'"
All fringe benefits at WMATA fall into one of three categories of cost. The first category
is allocated fringe benefits, which are calculated on an Authority-wide basis and then
charged out to all offices and all modes. Health insurance, life insurance, and pension
costs are all examples of allocated fringe benefits. These fringe benefit expenses are
allocated to each office based upon the budgeted payroll per office and then allocated
by mode based on the budgeted payroll by mode. The fiscal 2005 total budget for
allocated fringe benefits is $194.1 million.
Jl
Second, unallocated fringe benefits (also referred to as 'lother fringe benefits) are
budgeted by office in amounts specific to the needs of each office. These "otherJl
fringes are typically items such as tool allowances and work uniforms. Detail on the
$3.1 million fiscal 2005 total for this expense is shown in each office budget where this
cost occurs.
The third category of fringe benefit expense is workers' compensation cost. The fiscal
2005 bUdget requirement of $3.7 million is largely determined by actuarial analysis and
governmental requirements. This line item expense is budgeted in the Office of Loss
Control and Workers Compensation.
POSITIONS:
Full Time 1,540 781 321 89 2,731 6,949 320 7,269 10,000
Part Time 0 4 nt. nla 4 258 32 290 294
1,540 785 321 89 2.735 7,207 352 7,559 10,294
FULL·TIME EQUIVALENTS:
Full TIme 1,533.42 779.75 321.00 89.00 2,723.17 6,887.08 320.00 7,207.08 9,930.25
Part Time 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 129.00 16.00 145.00 147.00
1,533.42 781.75 321.00 89.00 2,725.17 7,016.08 338.00 7,352.08 10,077.25
PAYROLL COSTS:
Full Time Pay $112,9158,738 $55,291,900 $18,616,847 $2.640.682 $189.508.167 $373,707,245 $18,192.480 $391,899,725 $581,407,892
PartTlmltPay $122,600 $122,600 $7,284,500 $1,100,000 $8,384,500 $8,507,100
Overtime Pay $1,265,800 $2,054,978 $2,929,000 $109.900 $6,349,678 $18,181,229 $300,000 $18,481,229 $24,830,907
Less: Turnover Savings ($3,871,8001 1$1,895,100) ($638,100) 1$90,500) ($8,495,321) ($8,508,669) ($139,195) 1$8.847.8641 ($15,143,185)
BUdgeted Payroll $110,342,938 $55,574,378 $20,907,747 $2,660,082 $169,465,124 $390,864,305 $19,453,285 $410,117,590 $599,602.714
Budgeted By Payroll:
FICA Taxos $8,220,500 $4,140,300 $1,557,600 $203,500 $14,121,900 $29,299,800 $1,459,000 $30,758.800 $44.880,700
Defined Benefit Pensions $7,820,000 $3,450,000 $4,424,500 $230,000 $15,924,500 $0 $3,102,400 $3,102.400 $19,026,900
DefIned Contrtb Pensions $1,295,000 $1,295,000 $2,590.000 $0 $2,590,000
Life Insurance $810,000 $298,600 $134,000 $8,400 $1,049,000 SO $1,048,000
Long Tarm Disability $576,400 $259,600 $0 $10,000 $846,000 $0 $0 $846,000
Accident Inllurance $0 SO $6,200 $500 $8,700 $0 $6,700
Unemployment $73,600 $37,100 $1;900 $1,800 $126.400 $280,600 $13.000 $273,600 $400,000
Tllxes I Pension I Other $18,595,500 $9,480,600 $6,136,200 $452,200 $34,664,500 $29,560,400 54,574,400 $34,134,8(10 $68,799,300
ALLOCATED FRINGE BENEFITS $37,557,020 $18,290,823 $9,471,712 $923,700 $66,243,2QO $120,125,600 $7,720,800 $127,846,400 $194,089,600
Unallocllted Fringe Benefits $469,900 $239,500 $97,900 $27,200 $834,500 $2,198,900 $107.400 $2,306,300 $3,140,700
Workers' Compenslltlon $880,500 $342,800 $128,900 $16,400 $1,168,600 $2,409,400 $120,000 $2,529,400 $3,698,000
The projects budgeted here are for new services or for items that incur
operating expenses for which there is a specific funding source other than
local operating subsidy. The concept of "New Service" is a direct result of
the Regional Mobility Panel's recommendations to stabilize and
strengthen Metrobus through a series of initiatives. Through the Panel's
efforts, a new spirit reinvigorated Metrobus and provided a nationally
recognized system an avenue to compete in terms of cost effectiveness
and efficiency with private carriers. A part of this competitiveness was the
acceptance of a New Service Agreement by Local 689 of the
Amalgamated Transit Union, which established new wages and benefits
for bus operators operating new service routes.
l"
~.
!
.t,
,',
.(.
OVERVIEW
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority maintains and operates the second
largest rail and fifth largest bus system in America, measured in terms of ridership. Metro
provides intermodal bus and rail transportation for residents of the metropolitan area as
well as visitors to the nation's capital from across the country and around the world. A
sizable capital investment has been made by Federal, state and local governments to
provide such a system and care must be taken to ensure that this investment is maintained
to the highest standard so that it continues to provide safe, clean, reliable, and comfortable
service.
Funding Levels
The funding requirement in the CIP for fiscal 2005 totals $314.1 milHon and the fiscal 2005-
2010 program totals $1,890.1 million. The CIP is consistent with Board guidance and is
based on the current projected federal and non-federal contribution. Each program's
projects and funding will be discussed below.
The fiscal 2005 - 2010 IRP has been developed to include system rehabilitation requirements,
exclude any system expansion element, and provide for only a limited amount of system
enhancements as assets are replaced; thus the name IRP truly reflects the nature of the
program. The fiscal 2005 program is approved for implementation and the fiscal 2006-2010
program is approved for planning purposes.
The funding requirement of the fiscal20051RP is $290.1 million. The program is driven by the
need to rehabilitate and replace facilities, track and structures, and systems ($195.9 million),
which accounts for 67% of the funds required in the fiscal 2005 program. Bus and rail rolling
stock rehabilitation, including preventive maintenance ($69.4 million), accounts for 24% of the
funds required. Major projects in fiscal 2005 include the procurement of eNG buses, vertical
transportation rehabilitation, maintenance and modernization (escalators and elevators),
station enhancements, systems rehabilitation, information technology enhancements,
mechanical systems rehabilitation, and parking lot rehabilitation.
The funding for the fiscal 2005 - 2010 IRP totals $1,846.6 million, including the pay back of
a loan guarantee under the Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act of 1998
(TIFIA).
SAP
The fiscal 2005 - 2010 SAP includes project funding for Bus Expansion, Bus Enhancements,
and Ballston Station Improvements. The fiscal 2005 program is budgeted at $4.6 million. The
fiscal 2005-2010 budget totals $9.6 million.
Metro Matters
In 2002 the Board of Directors adopted a comprehensive 1O-year Capital Improvement Plan
totaling $12.2 billion. The Board also recognized the importance of a comprehensive,
prioritized plan to maintain the integrity of the existing capital plant and rolling stock, and
adopted three unfunded Urgent Priorities plus security requirements totaling $1.5 binion. This
program, known as Metro Matters, includes:
Since September 2003, staff have been developing and pursuing a funding strategy that
comprehensively includes Federal, state and local funding partners, and briefing a broad range
of funding partners, policy makers and stakeholders about the unfunded urgent capital
priorities. To maximize the utilization of funds through various investment strategies, a
Strategic Alliances and Risk Assessment (SARA) consultant has been working with staff, and
a Metro Matters Funding Agreement has been distributed to jurisdictional representatives for
review. With Board approval, the CIP will be revised as Metro Matters projects move forward.
Systems $74.8
Facilities t
iillfJj~!f.;
410/0
Local $99.5
Rolling Stock,
Financing $6 / Preventive Maint.
2%-1 Other $25.2
$69.4
50 --------1
-.&-Direct-Other 47 50 40 26 9 7 6 6
~,_._-~_._-- _--~-----, .. ,~_ .. __ ., ..
--~._,. _~.- .. _ - ------ ,. ..- -_.~.- ----_.-- - - ~ _ . -
[~_-~_·~.-~~-~g~~fr~;-~20~3_---~~:_~--
. -~:·- -= -(6-9) -~- -~~_-(31) =- ._(~~_O)-_ -··_~_6_1)L~~~~~_-_-.- . .I_.._-=_(_5~O=5_-)~_=__j.-_-_-_=_-·-~_(5-=...-0-=..5-=,) -_,~
._~lf~~~~~~~~~·
Credit Facility
.
• Commercial Paper/Letter of Credit $ 2.0
Total $ 2.0
~·~~.~~~~~~~~Wi~·~~~ij~~~·:;~~~~~~~~rif::;
..~ ;" ... ·dthei"SficJift;J·iifeasiJi:~s~. cReauTres :100% federal funding: .
IBack·Up Operations Control Center (OCC)
! • Construct & rehabilitate facilities $ 2.3
Other Securitv Initiatives
h..,,:;: Various Projects (refer to attachment 3-D) $ 7.2
Total $ 9.5
Financing Expenses
TIFIA Financing Expenses 106.825 133.200 161.600 198.375 600.000
Vertical Transportation Financing Expenses 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 36.000
Subtotal $ 6.000 $ 112.825 $ 139.200 $ 167.600 $ 204.375 $ 6.000 $ 636.000
Total Use of Funds $ 290.126 $ 313.910 $ 318.730 $ 303.754 $ 301.629 $ 318.4841 $ 1,846.633
Total Total
FY 2011·14 (For Information Purposes Only) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2011·14 FY 2005·14
.. Subtotal
Subtotal: Local Contributions
Subtotal: Grants and Contributions
$
$
$
59.595 $
99.456 $
258.898 $
83.547
126.880
300.210
$
$
$
69.567
115.460
299.030
$
$
$
53.941
102.704
297.754
$
$
$
32.942
85.479
295.629
$
$
$
28.383 $
85..204 $
312.484 $
327.975
615.183
1t 764.005
tv
o
w
Attachment 3: System Access/Capacity Program FY 2005-2010 Projects (in millions $)
Distric1 of Columbia
District of Columbia Government
Downtown Circulator Buses 16.266 - 16.266
· Public Hearing on Minnesota Ave. ParkIng 0.050 - 0.050
ryland
Maryland Mass Transit Authority (MD-MTA)
·
·
New Carrollton Parking Facility
Silver Sprina Transit Center
22.615
- -
22.615
.
Subtotal $ 39.925 S - $ - $ . S . $ - $ . $ . $ 39.925
Montgomery County
(a) P,ecjsion Stopping lor ATC funding indudes $3.0 million ~ppropf1aled prior to Metro Matters.
(bt Buill by olhers.
N
o
Vt
IV
o
0\
· Proiect Development
Subtotal
$
$
13.300
13.300
$
$
2.000
2.000
$
$
2.000
2.000
S
S
2.000
2.000
$
$
2.000
2.000
$
$
2.000
2.000
$
$
2.000
2.000
$
$
12.000
12.000
$
$
25.300
25.300
District of Columbia
District of Columbia Government
· DC Transit AUernaUves Anatysis & Anacostia
Corridor Demonstration Project 24.370 - 24.370
· New York Avenue Metrorail Station 103.700
.
- 103.700
Subtotal $ 128.070 $ - '$ - $ ~
$ - $ $ - .$ - $ 128.070
Maryland
Maryland Mass Transit Authority (MD-MTA)
· Largo Extension and Parking 447.100 9.300 9.300 456.400
· Purple Line DEfS
Subtotal $
10.600
457.700 $ 9.300 $ . $ - S - $ - S . $ 9.300
-
$
10.600
467.000
Virginia
Arlington Co. Project Development (Pentagon City) 0.040 0.040 0.040
VA Dept. of Rail & Public Transportation
· Dunes PEINEPA 52.250 8.000 4.500 12.500 64.750
Subtotal $ 52.250 $ 8.040 1$ 4.500 T$ - Is - 1$ ~ , $ - $ 12.540 $ 64.790
TotalSEP $ 651.320 $ 19.340 $ 6.500 $ 2.000 $ 2.000 S 2.000 $ 2.000 $ 33.840 $ 685.160
INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM
FY 2005 • 2010
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the replacement of older buses and will ensure safe and continued
service to the Washington Metropolitan Area. Fiscal 2005 funds the beginning procurement
of hybrid/diesel buses.
JUSTIFICATION:
The average age of the WMATA bus fleet is currently 8.7 years. FTA's bus procurement
gUidelines recommend an average bus life of 6 years with a bus life expectancy of 12
years. However, a mid-life bus overhaul program is extending the life of Metrobuses to 15
years. This will allow for a reduction in new bus procurements, while maintaining a bus
fleet that is efficient and provides a high level of service to customers.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $111,794
$ In __
.-,. Thousands
._----_......... _..... .... ..-- ,_.•..- ....-
~ -~----- ---_-.-._---
..
52,765
23.251
_ ....
1,000
FY 05 FY 06 FY07
11.-
FY08
0
FY09
0
FY10
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
Currently, the CNG bus fleet is operating out of Bladensburg Garage. The Bladensburg
facility was retrofitted to include a CNG fueling facility, but no provision was made for the
heavy maintenance of the eNG fleet. This facility is necessary to support that
maintenance.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $9,500
$ In Thousands
o o o o o
FYOS FYOG FY07 FYOB FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the replacement of older buses and will ensure safe and continued
service to the Washington Metropolitan Area. Fiscal 2005 funds a contract option for
CNG buses. eNG buses will operate out of Bladensburg and Four Mile Run Garages.
JUSTIFICATION:
This project will complete the planned procurements of CNG buses. Out year funding
will be used to procure hybrid/diesel buses.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
I Total:$119,402
SIn Thousands
LI FY05
--!LO
FY06
--!LO
FY07
~o
FY08
iil~_
FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the retrofit or replacement of rail car related equipment that will improve
the accessibility, safety, diagnostic capability, maintenance, appearance and reliability of
the rail car fleet. Fiscal 2005 funds enhancements to the public address system capabilities
for rail car operators.
JUSTIFICATION:
BUDGET SCHEDULE
o o o o o
FY05 FY06 FY07 FYOB FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
This project will enhance rail car reliability with the mid-life overhaul of 364 Breda cars
including propulsion, brake, door controls, signs, interior, truck, heating, ventilation and air
conditioning, lighting, communications, high voltage and control cables systems/equipment.
Fiscal 2005 funds project management and engineering.
JUSTIFICATION:
The Breda car overhaul includes the replacement of the DC propulsion system with an AC
drive system which will result in lower maintenance costs for the remaining Ufe of the cars.
Substantial power savings may be derived from the regenerative braking system. In
addition, the friction brake hydraulic, pneumatic and electronic control systems and door
system components are nearing the end of their useful life. This rehabilitation must be
performed to avoid the additional maintenance caused by worn out parts and electrical
system degradation.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $5,144
$ In Thousands
1 ..
FY05
8 1.4.
FY06
J!o
FY07
.-. !o~
FY08
____.JOl_
FY09
__!.O_~
FY10
DESCRIPTION:
• escalator/elevator maintenance,
• escalator rehabilitation,
• elevator rehabilitation.
These projects will fund the maintenance and the rehabilitation of escalators, and elevators.
The escalator rehabilitation includes the rehabilitation and code upgrade of the
Westinghouse modular escalators beginning with the oldest and poorest performing
equipment in the highest use stations. Fiscal 2005 funds the continuation of the mUlti-year
rehabilitation, with 32 escalators and 13 elevators scheduled for rehabilitation, and the
continuation of maintenance outsourcing of 347 escalators.
JUSTIFICATION:
A Blue Ribbon Panel studied the issues of elevator and escalator operation, rehabilitation,
and maintenance and provided their recommendations to the Board.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $139,460
$ In Thousands
I 32,476
21.991
l I
DESCRIPTION:
This project provides funding for the enhancement and restoration of rail passenger stations
including, concrete structures, granite edge stones, paver quarry tiles, sidewalks,
elastomeric roof coatings, all metal surfaces and gratings, stairwells, stairways, escalators
landing plates, platform shelters, doors hatches, exterior lighting and station signage and
graphics. Fiscal 2005 funds 14 major and 14 mini enhancements at 28 rail stations, various
signage improvements and communications.
JUSTIFICATION:
The station structures are aging and must be rehabilitated. Vaulted ceiling spalling and
deteriorated concrete has to be repaired to maintain structural integrity. Surface station
elastomeric roofing replacement is necessary to prevent accelerated deterioration. Station
walkways must be maintained to provide an adequate and safe environment for our patrons.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $25,109
$ In Thousands
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the rehabilitation of asphalt pavement, curbs, curbs/gutter, and
sidewalks; drainage systems, sign age, electrical wiring/conduits, pavement marking/striping,
structures, station access roadways/bus bays, and parking lot equipment such as lot full
signs and cashier booths. Fiscal 2005 funds the rehabilitation of three parking garages, ten
surface lots, seven bus loops/bays and one parking access road.
JUSTIFICATION:
The parking facilities are deteriorating due to weathering and normal wear and tear. Some
of the facilities have been in operation for over 27 years. The asphalt paving, concrete
sidewalks/roadways, and bus loops have deteriorated and require rehabilitation in order to
maintain safe and reliable service.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $41,731
$ In Thousands
o
FY05 FY06 FY07 FYOB FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
These projects include rehabilitation and replacement of aging and deteriorated equipment
including ventilation equipment, standpipes and sprinklers, airconditioning and underground
station and tunnel drainiage/sewage equipment and associated electrical systems. Fiscal
2005 activities include the rehabilitation/replacement of fans and dampers, continuation of
existing fire line and standpipe replacement at Forest Glen Station, chillers, cooling towers,
and air conditioning and handling units at ten stations, and replacement of sewer ejectors
at five stations.
JUSTIFICATION:
It is vital to replace tunnel ventilation systems, meet National fire code mandates requiring
installation of new fire suppression systems, and to maintain mechanical systems to ensu re
that passengers are transported in safe and comfortable conditions.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $83,845
$ In Thousands
FY05 FY06
__I IIIFY07 FY08
Ii ,
FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $34,206
$In Thousands
14,396
I
I
j
I
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the replacement of repairable parts for rail cars, facilities, systems
equipment bus parts and major components which are beyond economic repair and
increases in repairable parts inventories when required to support system expansion,
increased mileage of the fleets, and effective scheduling of the bus overhaul program.
Fiscal 2005 funds the continued support of repairable parts inventories.
JUSTIFICATION:
Repairable parts are vital components of WMATA's bus and rail system. Adequate
quantities of parts are required to perform corrective and preventative maintenance, and
overhauls. The funding is provided by 1000/0 local jurisdiction contributions.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $33,862
$ In Thousands
5,968
II
Ij
,
I
!
I
I!
-.J
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
• non-revenue vehicles,
• miscellaneous support equipment-other offices,
• misc. bus support equipment,
• misc. rail support equipment,
• bus lifts/bus work equipment,
II rail and bus washer rehabilitation.
JU STIFICATION:
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $57,162
$ In Thousands
_ _ _,_ _- _ _- 8_0_0_
DESCRIPTION:
These projects fund the design and rehabilitation of all major shop equipment located in the
rail car maintenance shops including overhead cranes, rail train lifts and hoists, industrial
shop air compressors, equipment service elevators and hoisting mechanisms, as well as
self-propelled rail work equipment and rehabilitation and replacement of locomotives. deicer
cars, flat cars and specialty cars. Fiscal 2005 funds the replacement of cranes and
overhaul/repair of lifts and the replacement of prime movers.
JU STIFICATION:
The replacement of shop equipment and heavy work equipment is necessary to maintain
rail car service reliability.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $13,660
$In Thousands
I
5,197
I
1
i
!
I
I
• •
1,000 1,000
0 _,I
FYOS FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
These projects include design, procurement and installation of all communications equipment
with the systems including stations, yards and shops, and the rehabilitation and replacement
of electrical systems, AC and DC circuit breakers, switchgear, and wayside automatic train
control equipment. Fiscal 2005 funds replacement and upgrade of vital communications
equipment, CTS, above ground FIA, telephone and intercom systems. high voltage systems
rehabilitation, and replacement of rectifiers.
JUSTIFICATION:
Communications systems and right-of-way systems have been in place for up to 25 years and
have been impacted by the elements which include station dust, water, high humidity and
corrosion. Equipment must be rehabilitated/replaced to ensure system reliability and integrity.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $213,537
$ In Thousands
49.850
FY05
__1_- FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
These projects fund the replacement of UPS systems and battery banks and the
rehabilitation, replacement and upgrading of electrical systems including lighting, power
cables, power distribution feeds and panels, power transfer switches, motor control centers,
voltage regulators, generators and ancillary connected devices. Fiscal 2005 funds lighting
equipment, power cables, and voltage regulators. and multi-year UPS/battery replacements.
JUSTIFICATION:
It is vital to replace and rehabilitate tunnel and passenger station lighting due to the harsh
underground environment and to procure battery banks to provide emergency power at
stations to ensure that passengers are transported in safe and comfortable conditions.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $36,500
$ In Thousands
7.994 7.842
FY05 FY06
• • ..
2.863
FY07
3.500
FY08
2.'00
FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
Fiscal 2005 funds the procurement of SMADS equipment to replace existing equipment,
procurement of station carts, and replacement of currency handling equipment.
JUSTIFICATION:
This project is need to complete the interface with the fare collection vending machines and
fare gates.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $6,821
$ In Thousands
4,071
2,750
i
lI
o o o o ~
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
These projects include the design, construction and rehabilitation of aerial structures and
tunnels, the retrofit of floating slabs to maintain proper rail elevations, and the replacement
of running rail, rail fasteners, rail switch points, stock rail frogs, restraining rail, cross ties and
fences and gates. Fiscal 2005 funds the steel tunnel liner rehab, replacement of
approximately 100 floating slabs, and replacement of running rail, welding, cross ties and
fasteners.
JUSTIFICATION:
These projects are required to control corrosion and deterioration due to weather, thermal
effects, cracks or breaks. Failure to replace these items will effect service reliability and
cause system degradation.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $68,582
$ In Thousands
8995 .9000
I_.~_ _1Ii__lli._
1 _
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the design and implementation of a program to correct water leaks in
stations and tunnels to ensure the structural integrity of the tunnel liner,s and to prevent
corrosion of wayside systems and equipment. Ground water intrusion into stations and
tunnels is occurring at numerous stations within Metrorail at cracks and expansion joints.
Fiscal 2005 funds the continuation of the grouting program.
JUSTIFICATION:
Groundwater intrusion has caused extensive corrosion to wayside tunnel systems including
automatic train control, communications, traction power equipment and cabling. A program
is necessary to address this problem.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $10,089
$ In Thousands
2,625
DESCRIPTION:
JUSTIFICATION:
The technological needs of the Authority are being addressed through an IT Strategic- Plan
and the systematic replacement of systems is underway allowing for the gathering,
processing and storing of secure data.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $15,658
$ In Thousands
4,658
L .-
FY05
_____
FY06 FY07
1.000
.-_-..-JlliilliliI__
FY08
1.000
I_L__
FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds General and Program Administration costs, including outside engineering
and consultant costs. Fiscal 2005 funds the continuation of these programs.
JUSTIFICATION:
These costs are necessary to support the management and administration of the IRP and to
contract for the expertise necessary to design specific IRP projects.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $ 59,271
$ In Thousands
15,736
14,139
8,053
6,912
FY05 FYOS • •
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds a portion of the bus/rail vehicle overhaul/maintenance program which is
included in the IRP. Fiscal 2005 funds the continuation of the comprehensive bus/rail
overhaul/maintenance program.
JUSTIFICATION:
Capitalizing a portion of the bus/rail overhaul/maintenance costs will ensure high quality bus
and rail vehicles. This program will also help to extend bus life to 15 years and will reduce bus
replacement costs and relieve the IRP of some financial burden.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $124,200
Sin Thousands
!
r.
r
I
,:
"1
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds additional buses needed to address system access/capacity needs.
Fiscal 2005 funds the procurement of buses.
JUSTIFICATION:
Buses must be available to transport customers to rail stations in order to address system
access/capacity needs in the coming years.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
I Total: $2.900* I
I
I
_______
0 .._._ ------:;0_ _._ ..Q_ __. O_ __ . o.. •... -_.- ..
._-~_ ~ _ ..
FY 05 FY 06 FY07 FYOB FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds improvements to customer information on high performing routes and .
high priority corridors and develops a systems integration plan for bus traffic, prioritization
and real time bus information. Fiscal 2005 funds the start of these improvements.
JUSTIFICATION:
This project is needed to address system access/capacity needs.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $6,000*
!
!
I 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000:
1 _ '. . ... . ... .. . .- _ _. . . - . ._
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds improvements to Ballston Station including design and construction
of an additional mezzanine and entrance, and additional elevators. Fiscal 2005 funds
completion of installation of three additional elevators and construction of an
underground passageway.
JUSTIFICATION:
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $550*
$ In Thousands . _ - - - - ..._---_..
f - - 550 --------- - - - - - - . - - -... -.-.--..-..--..- ..-.--... ----_._- .._-_... ".,._,._ ... __.". '.
!
- - - - " -0
- - - - _0
.. 0
•.•....... __ _._-_._- __ ~---
0 ..Q. . .i
FY 05 FY 06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
r
;
/
,{
,
.,
j
,..
,
I
I
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the professional services, environmental assessments and preliminary
engineering necessary to provide rail service in the Dulles corridor. Fiscal 2005 funding
supports continued PE activities with Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation
as the project sponsor.
JUSTIFICATION:
This project addresses the requirements to provide more service in the Dulles corridor
including the engineering work necessary to prepare for rail service in the corridor in the
future.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
-,
Total: $12,500*
._ ._.__.._L__.__._.. _.,,_._...__ .~_ . _.._._..._._...._.. _._.....Q....__..... __._ ... ".. ,,_..._ Q..._ _.,
FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds the extension of the Blue Line from its current terminal at Addison Road
to a new terminal at Largo Town Center. Fiscal 2005 funding supports construction
activities, project management, insurance, and IAWP support.
JUSTIFICATION:
This project funded with State of Maryland and Federal funds, will provide 3.2 miles of
additional rail service to customers in Prince George's county.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
Total: $9,300*
r-$ In Thousands
9,300 .-..-- ---- - '" .. . ..- --.----.- - -- - "'- _ _ - -_ .
DESCRIPTION:
This project funds sketch engineering concepts for new extension or capacity
enhancement projects in the District, Maryland and Virginia. Fiscal 2005 funds studies
under the Board's Transit Service Expansion Plan, and engineering feasibility studies in
coordination with the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction contributes proportionately to the
project.
JUSTIFICATION:
Advancing selected projects requested by the jurisdictions in accordance with the Board
of Directors Transit Expansion Plan as updated, is necessary to provide sketch engineering
in advance of funding for design, acquisition, and construction. This improves regionar
mobility and accessibility.
BUDGET SCHEDULE
,I
J
I
Alexandria $83
Arlington County $189
Fairfax $4
Fairfax County $269
Falls Church $3
Virginia $548
Local Total $2,057
Operating:
Rail Base Allocation
Elelnents and Weighting
• Density weighted population by jurisdiction of residence 33%
• Number of rail stations by jurisdiction 33%
,. Average weekday ridership by jurisdiction of residence 33%
Para Transit
• Cost are allocated based on riders jurisdiction of residence:
o Cost per trip based on trips completed
o Scheduling cost based on trips requested
II Vehicle lease cost based on number of assigned vehicles per jurisdiction
Capital:
IRP Bus projects
• Allocated based on total weekday revenue miles
PRINCE
DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CllYOF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY AlEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
ETROBUS OPERATING SUBSIDY
REGIONAL SUBSIDY $82.265,101 $27.846.913 $31.057,037 $9,477,588 $14.399,280 $348.898 $23,203.652 $751,601 $189,350,070
NON-REGIONAL $20.905.371 $5,885,109 $11.874,116 $661,306 $405.000 $0 $6,215,118 $0 $45,946.020
TOTAL BUS OPERATING $103.170,472 $33.732,023 $42.931.152 $10,138,894 $14.804,280 $348.898 $29,418.770 $751,601 $235,296,090
43.8°k 14.3% 18.2% 4.30/0 6.3% O.1°k 12.5% 0.3%
ARATRANSIT SUBSIDY $10,995,178 $14,552,639 $14,835,729 $643.255 $572,312 $86,027 $5,944.510 $67.050 $47.696,700
23.1 ok 30.5% 31.1% 1.3% 1.2% 0.2% 12.5°J'o 0.1 Ok
UBTOTAL OPERATING SUBSIDY $153,438,022 $71.793.978 $79,236.119 $16,228.905 $26.793,986 $824,116 $52,758.132 $1.141.093 $402,214,350
PRINCE
GEORGE'S ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY
COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
COLUMBIA COUNTY
SECTION 9 MATCH:
3,525.7 1,363.3 2,142.0 425.7 633.9 1.285.2 25.3 9,401.2
BUS PROJECTS
5,649.9 2.908.' 2.574.7 684.7 '.543.8 48.7 2,196.3 44.7 15.650.4
RAIL CATEGORY 2
TOTAL SECTION 9 MATCH 9,175.6 4,271.4 4.716.7 1,110.4 2.177.7 48.7 3.481.4 70.0 25.051.6
SECTION 3 MATCH:
BUS PROJECTS
RAIL CATEGORY 2 5.346.1 2,751.7 2.436.3 647.9 1,460.8 46.0 2,078.2 42.3 14.809.0
TOTAL SECTION 3 MATCH 5,346.1 2~751.7 2,436.3 647.9 1,460.8 46.0 2,078.2 42.3 14,809.0
DISTRIBUTION OF PRINCE
RAIL OPERATING DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S FAIRFAX ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FALLS
ASSISTANCE: COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA CITY COUNTY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
FY1999 38.33% 18.49% 15.56% 4.52% 0.30% 10.32% 14.19% 0.29% 100%
FY2000 36.90% 18.35% 15.46% 4.48% 0.30% 10.18% 14.05% 0.29% 100%
FY2001 38.13% 18.84% 16.29% 4.32% 0.32% 9.75% 14.07% 0.28% 100%
FY2002 35.60% 18.55% 17.69% 4.26% 0.31% 9.49% 13.83% 0.28% 100%
FY2003 35.54% 18.68% 17.28% 4.31% 0.32% 9.58% 14.03% 0.29%- 100%
FY1999·2003 36.10% 18.58% 16.45% 4.38% 0.31% 9.86% 14.03% 0.29% 100.00%
DISTRIBUTION OF WEEKDAY
REVENUE MILES 37.5% 14,5% 22.8% 25.2% 100%
Reserves 253
This Page Not Used
254 Reserves
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
OFFICE OF ACCOUNTING
OPERATING AND CAPITAL RESERVES
JUNE 30, 2004
Ooerating Reserves
$2,187,848
$0 $2,187,848
Reimbursable Project Reserve $1,300,372 $887,476
62,060,278 (27,357,702) 34,702,576 34,702,576 0
Injuries & Damages\Workmen's Comp
7,893,844 (1,080,555) 6,813,289 0 6,813,289
Operating Contingency
25,385,018 (9,104,464) 16,280,554 16,280,554 0
Parking Surcharge
Medical Claims Reserve 1,910,528 533,779 2,444,307 2,444,307 0
,"
I
I
I
256 Reserves·
APPENDIX A
RESOLUTIONS
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2. Page A-6 Approval of FY 2005 Operating Budget and Reimbursable Projects (04-30)
(includes FY2005 fare adjustment package)
3. Page A-i6 Establishment of Operational Funding for 4-Car Late Night Trains (04-42)
13. Page A-54IRP Subsidy Allocation Formula and SAP Formula (03-20)
17. Page A-60 Policy for Capital & Operating Costs for New Start Projects (00-35)
18. Page A-62 Establishment of Reimbursable Policy and Project Reserve Funds (99-63)
19. Page A-66 Revised Policy on Transit Infrastructure Investment Fund (TIIF) (00-50)
20. Page A·69 Amended Polley on Transit Infrastructure Investment Fund (TIIF) (02-44)
21. Page A·73 Establishment of TIIF Funding for Joint Development Activities (04-43)
20Q3-57
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, The CEO will present a proposed fiscal 2005 operating budget to the Board of
Directors in December, 2003; and
WHEREAS, Staff has provided the Board with estimates of potential costs, revenues and
resulting jurisdictional requirements; and
WHEREAS, Key assumptions now need to be defined and Board budget guidelines need
to be established to reflect these key assumptions; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, The Board Budget Committee recommends Board approval of the proposed
fiscal 2005 operating budget assumptions and gUidelines contained in Attachment A; and
be it further
RESOL VED, That upon approval of the Board of Directors this resolution shall become
effective immediately.
The CEO will present the proposed fiscal 2005 operating budget, including jurisdictional
allocations, .to the Board Budget Committee in December 2003. The priority for the budget
will be cost containment, consistent with the need to maintain system safety, system
reliability, and service quality. The proposed fiscal 2005 operating budget will be developed
in accordance with the following assumptions and requirements:
1. The proposed operating budget expenses shall not exceed 7 percent above
the 2004 budget, as amended, for expenses.
2. The proposed operating budget subsidy shall not exceed 4.5 percent above
the 2004 budget, as amended, for subsidy.
3. There shall be revenue and cost adjustment options prepared and presented
in December which achieve the cost and subsidy levels specified.
All of the above calculations shall exclude debt service requirements which are fixed
and do not vary from fiscal 2004 to fiscal 2005.
The proposed budget will meet all federal and local requirements, including the ADA
paratransit mandate.
The fiscal 2005 operating subsidy calculations will continue the use of Board approved
subsidy distribution formulas. The fiscal 2005 subsidy allocations will be based on the
most recent formula data available, including a full phase in the most recent census
data available and the most recent ridership by jurisdiction of residence data available.
2004-30
.
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, The Board of Directors has received and considered the comments of .
the local jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2005 Operating Budget; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Directors has received and considered the requests of
the local jurisdictions on establishing the Fiscal 2005 Reimbursable Operating
Projects; and
WHEREAS, The FY2005 Operating Budget includes:
• A fare increase generating additional operating revenue of $29.2 million
dollars,
• Approximately $33.5 million in cost reductions and increases in non-
passenger revenues,
• Opening of the two new station and six miles of additional rail system
on the Blue Line,
• Opening of an in-fill station at New York Avenue,
• Continued rapid expansion of paratransit services to meet increased
demand,
• Metrobus service improvements on Route 22B and US Route 29,
• Metrorail 5:00AM early opening;
now, therefore, be it
RESOL VEO That the Board of Directors approves the Fiscal 2005 Operating
Budget providing for revenues of $538,468,850; operating expenses of
$940,683,200; and an operating subsidy requirement of $402,214,350, as well as a
Fiscal 2005 debt service requirement of $27,484,200; and approves a staffing level
of 10,327 positions; and be it further
RESOL VED That the Board of Directors approves the fare and fee increases as
shown in attachment A; and be further
RESOL VED That weekend rail service from 2:00AM to 3:00AM on Friday and
Saturday nights shall be converted from a District of Columbia reimbursable project
to regional service as of January 1, 2005; and be it further
RESOL VED That the Reimbursable Operating Projects that will be undertaken are
as follows:
Service Subsidy
Columbia Pike Street Supervisor $75,000
3Y Bus Route $150,000
George Route $410,000
Customer Service & Signage Ini. $0
Laurel- Burtonsville Express $115,000
Weekend 3AM Rail Late Close# $935,000
National Arboretum $60,000
College Park - Bethesda $465.083
Crofton - New Carrollton $210,426
Greenbelt - aWl $1,076,572
Chartes County Service $704,894
Springfield Circulator $464,801
Metro Park Shuttle $181,428
Springfield Shuttle $124,627
Tyson's Reverse Commute $262,183
Van Pools $215,250
Access-ta-Jobs $358.750
Total 5,809,014
# DC reimbursable until 12/31/04
and be it further
RESOL VED That the operating reimbursable project for enhanced passenger
communication and signage shall be undertaken utilizing the revenues obtained
from a Board approved advertising initiative, to be continued until the Board acts to
2
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors A-7
RESOLVED That the operating reimbursable project for enhanced passenger
communication and signage shall be undertaken utilizing the revenues obtained
from a Board approved advertising initiative, to be continued until the Board acts to
eliminate, or amend the project, and that the elements of this initiative shall be
approved by the Budget Committee annually; and be it further
RESOL VED That the Board of Directors approves the carryover of funds with a
total of $783 r OOO t $283,000 for collateral graphic arts material for fare actions and
$500.000 for purchasing of SmarTrip cards to support parking, from fiscal 2004 to
fiscal 2005 for; and be it finally
)'
3
A-8 Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
Fiscal 2005 Fare Adjustments
Effective Date: June 27, 2004
Metrorail Prices
Increase regular fares by the following:
• Increase the regular boarding charge to $1 .35
• Increase the regular mileage charge for miles 3 - 6 to $0.22
• Increase the regular mileage charge for over 6 miles to $0.195
• Increase the maximum regular fare to $3.90
Maintain the fare for senior and disabled patrons at one-half the regular period
fare, all day, not to exceed an amount of $1.95
Charge regular fares for Friday and Saturday late night closing between the hours
of 2:00 AM and 3:00 AM on Saturday and 2:00 AM and 3:00 AM on Sunday
Metrobu5 Prices
Increase the Regular Metrobu5 boarding charge to $1.25
Increase the fare on routes 94, A-2-4-5-6-7-B, M8-9, W2, W3. W6, W8-9, 82, P1-2, P-6,
U-2 and 90 to $0.75 .
Increase the fare on routes 2T 2W, 3T, 12C-D-E-L-F-M-R-S, 18R-S, 20F-W-X-Y, 24T, and
28T to $1.00
Transfers Arrangements
Increase the fee for transfers from regular Metrobus to Metrobus Express routes to
$1.75
Increase the transfer fee from local buses to Metrobu5 to the following:
I
• ART Route 90 to Metrobus: $0.75, all other ART to Metrobus: Free
• The Bus to Metrobus: $0.50
• Connect-a-Ride to Mefrobus: Free
• . DASH to Metrobus: Free
• Fairfax Connector Routes: Free
• George to Metrobus: $0.75
• PRTC Omniride to Metrobus: Free
• Ride On to Metrobus: Free
Increase the transfer fee from local buses to Mefrobus Express routes to the
following:
Retain the free transfer to Metrobus for VRE ticket and pass holders and increase
the price of a transfer to Metrobus Express routes to $1 .75
Montgomery County
District of Columbia
Arlington County
City of Alexandria!
Fairfax County
Fairfax County
Total
Station Base Fee Surcharge Fee Parking Fee
Rockville Station
12- hour metered lot
($.25 per 45 minutes) $2.75 $1.25 $4.00
(68.8%) (31.2%)
All Stations
12- hour parking meters
($0.25 per 45 minutes) $4.00 $0.00 $4.00
All Stations
7-hour and shorter duration meters
($0.25 per 45 minutes)
(Current rates remain in effect) $2.35 $0.00 $2.35
Increase the daily parking fee for non-Metro riders at New Carrollton to $7.50
and at Twinbrookl and White Flint to $7.75
Metrorall
Increase the price of the One-Day pass to $6.50 (Valid after ·9:30 AM weekdays
and all day Saturday and Sunday)
Increase the maximum allowable fare on the 7-Day Short Trip pass to $2.20
Metrobus
Retain the price of the Regional One Day bus pass at $3.00 (Valid all day)
other
Increase the price of the MARC/VRE Transit Link Pass to $65
Maintain the price of the MARC Commuter Bus Transit Link pass at $110
MetroAccess Fares
Increase the MetroAccess fare from $2.40 to $2.50, one-half the bus boarding
charge
Add a supplemental fare to the ~etroAccess base fare for all MefroAccess trips
originating or terminating beyond 3h of a mile from fixed-route bus route or rail
station, with a supplemental fare of $1.00 added for every three miles beyond
the 3/.. mile service area limit to a maximum of $4.00 per one-way passenger trip.
The service area limit shall be established based upon the weekday peak
period service of Metrobus, Metrorail and local jurisdiction bus services.
~
~
PRINCE
(l) DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY GEORGE'S CJTYOF ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
=
.....
p..
TROBUS OPERAnNG SUBSIDY
COLUMBIA COUNTY COUNTY ALEXANDRIA COUNTY CITY COUNTY CHURCH TOTAL
*
> EGIONAL SUBSIDY $82,265.101 $27,846,913 $31.057,037 $9.4n,588 $14.399,280 S348,898 $23,203.652 $751.601 S189.350,070
I $11.874,116 $661.306 $405.000 $0 $6,215,118 $0 545,946.020
ON.REGIONAL 520,905.371 $5.885.109
~
n TOTAL BUS OPERATING $103,170.472 $33,732,023 $42.931.152 $10,138,894 $14,804.280 $348,898 529.418.nO $751.601 $235.296.090
en
0 0.1% 12.5% 0.3%
~ 43.8% 14.3% 18.2% 4.3% 6.3°A»
g
.....
0
~ mOHAlL OPERATING SUBSIDY
0
......, ASE ALLOCATION $39.009,027 $21.401,475 $20.544.413 $5,341,245 $11,344.515 $348.796 $16.424.616 $310,299 $114,724.445
$72,880 $40,395 $970.236 $12.142 $4.497,115
S'
(l)
AX FARE SUBSIDY $263.345 52.107.841 $924.763 $105.512
TOTAL RAIL OPERATING 539.272.372 $23,509.316 $21.469.237 $5,446.757 $11,417.394 $389.191 $17.394.852 $322.441 $119.221,560
tI:I
0.3%
a
0
:TRANSIT SUBSIDY
32.9%
$10,995.178
19.7%
$14,552,639
18.0%
$14,835.729
4.6%
$643,255
9.60/0
$572.312
0.3%
$86.027
14.6%
TOTAL OPERATING SUBSIDY $153,438,022 $71,793,978 $79.236.119 $16.228.905 $26.793,986 $824,116 $52,758,132 $1,141.093 $402,214,350
2004-42
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD BUDGETCOMMITTEE
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, The authority implemented late night two-car train operation (Sunday
through Thursday after 10:30 PM) as part of the FY05 budget, resulting in cost savings
of $1,000,000; and
WHEREAS, It has been determined that this change has resulted in extreme crowding on
some of the two-car trains; and
WHEREAS, The Operations and Safety Committee unanimously voted to restore late
night four-car train operations on July 22, 2004 and referred the budget impact to the
September 9, 2004 Board Budget Committee; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the FY05 Operating Budget expenses and revenues be increased by
$1,000,000; and be it further
RESOL VED, That the Board of Directors approves the Amended Fiscal 2005 Operating
Budget providing for revenues of $539,468,850;- operating expenses of $941 ,683,200 and
an operating subsidy requirement of $402,214,350; and be it further
cdlit. J f. u /. !
Carol B. O'Ke~ffe /7 ~ -
Acting General Counsel .>i
2004-31
~ RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, The Board of Directors has received and considered comments from the
local jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2005-2010 Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) consisting of the Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP). System Access/Capacity
.Program (SAP), and the System Expansion Program (SEP); and
WHEREAS, In order to meet the funding programmed in Fiscal 2005 and beyond, the
proposed program includes the use of a loan guarantee up to $600 million under the
Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act of 1998 (TIFIA); and
WHEREAS, The Board of Directors recognizes that the Fiscal 2005 - 2010 CIP is
severely impacted by current and projected funding shortfalls. and has defin'ed three
urgent priorities - fully funding the IRP (a shortfall of $524.9 million); expansion of the
rail fleet and associated support facilities (a shortfall of $600.7 million); and expansion of
the bus fleet and facilities (a shortfall of $171.5 million); and
WHEREAS, On May 20, 2004, the Board of Directors authorized staff to circulate the
draft Metro Matters Funding Agreement to the jurisdictions containing recommendations
of the Strategic Alliances and Risk Assessment Program, which would enable the
jurisdictional funding partners to fund Metro Matters programs in affordable increments;
now therefore be it
RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors approves the Fiscal 2005 CIP totaling
$314,066,000 as follows: 1) the IRP totaling $290,126,000; 2) the SAP totaling
$4,600.000; and 3) the SEP totaling $19,340.000 all of which are further defined in the
documents comprising the "Attachment to Proposed Resolution of the Board of
Directors of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority" (hereinafter referred to
as IlAttachment"); and be it further
Page 1 of9
RESOLVED, That the Fiscal 2006 - 2010 CIP totaling $1,576,007,000, which includes
the IRP totaling $1,556,507,000, the SAP totaling $5,000,000 and the SEP totaling
$14,500,000, all of which are further defined in the Attachment, is hereby approved for
planning purposes; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Fiscal 2011 - 2014 IRP element of the CIP totaling
$1,740,000,000, also further defined in the Attachment, is included for information
purposes; and be it further
RESOLVED, That consistent with Board policy that lRP funding approved in any fiscal
year should be committed in that fiscal year; thus, the Fiscal 2005 program funding
provided in the IRP must be committed by June 30, 2005, and those committed funds
must become a confirmed obligation by December 31, 2005; and that funds which are
not obligated by the deadlines will be separately identified to the Board for retention for
Fiscal 2006 IRP program needs or for consideration as part of the Fiscal 2007 bUdget;
and be it further .
RESOLVED, That in order. to implement the elements of the CIP, the Chief Executive
Officer or the Chief of Staff has authorization to: 1) conduct public hearings; 2) file and
execute grant applications on behalf of the authority for funds from the Federal
government and any other pUblic or private entity consistent with the CIP; arid be it
further
RESOLVED, That the Chief Financial Officer is authorized to issue revenue anticipation
notes, revenue bonds, certificates of participation, and other financial borrowing
instruments, subject to Board approval of the final papers for each such transadion. in
order to finance the CIP; and be it further
RESOL VED, That the IRP is the same program as the CIP referenced in the TIFIA Loan
Guarantee Agreement and related documentation; and be it finally
Page 2of9
Page 3 of9
>
tv
I
0
Attachment to the Proposed Resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Page 4 of9
Attachment to the Proposed Resolution of the Board of Directors of the
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
>
--0
~ Attachment 1: Infrastructure Renewal Program FY 2005-2010 Use of Funds
CD
(in millions $)
&
.....
~
~ FY 2006 fIlggZ FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Total
»I 'nfonnation Technology
~
Information Technology 4.658 2.000 2~OOO 1.000 1.000 5.000 15.658
(l)
fIl Subtotal S 4.658 $ 2.000 $ 2~OOO $ 1.000 $ 1.000 S 5.000 $ 15.658
0
Program Management and Support
~
r"'t'
Consultants and Engineering Services (IAWP) 4.500 3.000 2.500
o'
::s Program Administration 9.639 7.431
2.500
5.553 4.412
1.000
3.000
8.196
7.540
21.696
en 37.575
0
......., Subtotal S 14.139 $ 10.431 S 8.053 S 6.912 S 4.000 S 15.736 $ 59.271
f"'+ Preventive Maintenance
t:r
G Preventive Maintenance 20.700 20.700 20.700 20.700 20.700 20.700 124.200
to Subtotal S 20.700 $ 20.700 S 20.700 S 20.700 S 20.700 $ 20.700 S 124.200
0
~ .. Subtotal: Capital Projects $ 284.126 S 201.085 S 119.530 $ 136.154 $ 97.254 $ 312.484 $ 1,210.633
P-
o
~ Financing Expenses
tJ
..... TIFIA Financing Expenses 106.825 133.200 161.600 198.375 600.000
~
(l)
0 VertIcal Transportation Financing Expenses 6.000 6~OOO 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.000 36.000
f""'t-
0 Subtotal $ 6.000 S 112.825 $ 139.200 S 167.600 $ 204.375 S 6.000 $ 636.000
~
fIl
Total Use of Funds S 290.126 S 313.910 S 318.730 S 303.754 $ 301.&29 S 318.484 $ 1,846.633
Total Total
FY 2011-14 (For Information Purposes Only) FY 2011 FY2012 FY2013 fV2014 FY 2011-14 FY2005-14
Page 50f9
> I
Attachment to the Proposed Resolution of the Board of Directors of the
N
tv Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
~
!o1j
Local Match for Federal Grants
Federal Transit Formula Grant (Section 5307) 25.052 23.296 24.672 26.215 28.244 30.547 158.026
g Federal Transit Capital Investment Grant (Section 5309) 14.809 20.037 21.221 22.548 24.293 26.274 129.182
0.
~. 39.861 $
Subtotal $ 43.333 $ 45.893 $ 48.763 $ 52.531 $ 56.821 $ 287.208
>I Other Local Contributions
Additional Local Contributions 46.241 70.043 55.913 40.137 19.094 14.810 246.238
it'
~
rA
Fedeml TEA-21 Flexible Funding via local Jurisdictions 8.054 8.054 8.054 8.054 8.054 8.054 48.324
0 Repairable Parts Accounts 5.300 5.450 5.600 5.750 5.794 5.519 33.413
~
4"""+
~. Subtotal $ 59.595 $ 83.547 $ 69.567 $ 53.941 $ 32.942 $ 28.383 $ 327.975
0
::s
rA
.... Subtotal: Local Contributions S 99.456 $ 126.880 S 115.460 S 102.704 S 85.479 S 85.204 $ 615.183
0 Subtotal: Grants and Conbibutions $ 258.898 $ 300.210 $ 299.030 $ 297.754 $ 295.629 S 312.484 $ 1,764.005
I-t)
:;.
(I)
Other Fund Sources
OJ
a Intemally Generated Funds - Bus and Rail 3.528 3.528
a
0
Passenger Revenue to Support Vertical Transportation
Project Close-Out I Reprogramming
6.000
7.000
6.000 6..000 6.000 6.000 6.000 36.000
7.000
~
tj Refinancing and Tax Advantage leases 14.700 14..700
......
""'t
CD Transportation Infrastructure Investment Fund (TIIF) 7..700 13.700 21.400
n
...... Subtotal $ 31.22a- $ 13.700 $ 19.700 $ 6.000 $ 6.000 $ 6.000 S 82.628
0
"1
00
Total Source of Funds $ 290.126 $ 313.910 $ 318.730 S 303.754 $ 301.629 S 318.484 S 1,846.633
Page 60f9
-.. ..
··
Buses S 8.200 S 2.900 S 2.900 S 9.100
Buses (SO) 17.100 .. 17.100
· Bus Enhancements 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 6.000 8.000
· 'nteUigenl Trans. Systems: CommunJc8tions
Metro Mattem:
1.562 .- 1.662
··
RegIonal Customer Service Center 0.550 · 0.550
RaiJ Cars (50) 120.000 · 120.000
· Rail Maintsnance Yards and Shoos
Subtotal: An WMATA Jurisdictions $
70.375
242.432 $ 3.900 S 1.000 S 1.000 S 1.000 $ 1.000 S 1.000 S
·
8.900 S
70.375
251.332
Distrlet of Columbta
DIstrict of Columbia Govemment
·· Downtown Cln=ufator Buses
Public Hearlng on MInnesota Ave. Parking
16.266
0.050 .-
18.266
0.050
· Station Name Changes: R' Ava &Archives 0.211 · 0.211
· Washlnoton Convention Center 31.374
- - - .. . -·
31.374
SubtoWl: District ofColumbia S 47.901 S S $ S S S · $ S 47.901
and
Maryfand Ma&6 Transit Aulhorily (MD-MTA)
· Canoll!on Paftdng Faciit,
College Patk Partclng Fadllty 17..310 .. 17.310
..
$ 39.925
Page 70f9
Alfachment to the Proposed Resolution of the B~rd of Directors of the
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
· Cfly Canopy
Oarendon Station Improvements
· Crystaf
1.000
0.300
·-
- 1.000
0.300
·· ShlrlJnQton
Rosslyn SfaUon Improvements 0.350 0.350
Bus Tennlnal 1.800
.. · 1.800
Subtotal
Faltfax County
S 18.350 S 0.700 S S . S · S - S · S 0.700 S 19.050
···
Pentagon Sus Tenninals 0.291 - 0.291
Facmly ExpansIon
VIrgtnIa Bus 0.900 - 0.800
-·
VJrgfR!a Bus Slap Boxes 0.120 0.120
· VirgInia Bus Waiting Area 1.582 1.562
· VJtginfa Paddng Lot Slgnage 1.000
·- 1.000
··
West Fals Church Bus Bay 1.000 1.000
West FaDs Ct.Jrch Parfdno FacUilv 17.367 - 17.367
- - .- - .- - -
Subtotal $ 41.903 S S $ S $ $. S S 41.903
Subtotal: VrfQinia S 124.010 S 0.700 $ - S S · S S · S 0.700 S 124.710
Total SAP S ~72..coa S 4.800 S 1.000 S 1.000 $ 1.000 $ 1..000 $ 1.000 S 9.800 S 482.008
Page 8 Or9
•
DIstrict of ColumbIa
District of Columbia Government
· DC Transit Alternatives Analysis & Anacostia
Corridor Demonstration Project 24.370
· 24.370
· New York Avenue Metrorail Station 103.700 · 103.700
Subtotal S 128.070 $ - S - S - S - S · $ - S ~ S 128.070
Maryland
Maryland Mass Transit Authority (MO-MTA)
VirgInia
Arlington Co. Project Development (Pentagon City) 0.040 0.040 0.040
VA Depl of Rail & Public Transportation
· Dulles PEINEPA
Subtotal S
52.250
52.250 S
8.000
8.040 $ I
4.500
4.500 Is - 1$ - Is · 1$ - S
12.500
12.540 S
64.750
64.790
TatalSEP S 651.320 S 19.340 $ 6.500 $ 2.000 $ 2.000 S 2.000 $ 2.000 S 33.840 $ 685.1&0
Page 90f9
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: MAY 13, 1999
SUBJECT: REPROGRAMM'NG POLICY
1199-21
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANS'T AUTHORITY
• Any action that requires a transfer of funds between the personnel and
non-personnel categories of expense; and
• Any action which meets the threshold for Board approval and results in
a cumulative increase of $ 200,000 in operating funds during the fiscal
year:
• from other than the category in which it is budgeted; or
e from other than the department in which it is budgeted; or
• in excess of the amount budgeted for any given category in any
department; and
a Any profession~1 and technical services contracts over $50,000 and any
unbudgeted professional and technical services contracts over $10,000;
and
A-26
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
Any expenditures wh,ch exceed $ 25 thousand for programs not defined
or provided for in the budget and/or any new inhiative which has out year
operating budget impacts; and
[IJ.Av\X ~j).:.if~/"
/'
!\ • ( _! "
\\ ., 1\"' V /
I:
C eryl Cf,8ur~e\ '
General Counsel
VI/HEREAS, beginning in iiscsl 2000, the Board 0; Direc10rs has determined then a quaneriy
report on ihe status oi ihe \nirasHuc'ture Renewal Frogram will be presented to the Board Budget
Comminee; and
WHEREAS the inlrastruCture Renewal Program includes Internaliy Generated Funds as e iunding
source lor projects; and
V\IHEREAS irom lime to time adjustments may be required iO approved lnirsstruc'\ure Renewoi
Program budgets and project iunding levels; and
VvHEREAS 'he Soard Budget Committee hes directed the Ger.eral Manager 10 establish a budget
amendmem and reprogramming po\icy ior 1he Inirastructure Renewal Program.
NOVoJ, THEREFORE BE 11 RESOLVED that ihe ;ol\owing actions aHeeting the inirastrueture
Renewal Program budget shall require approval of the Board Budget Comminee prior to submission i.0
t he Board oi Directors:
amendment 0; any flscal year's total budget in the approved s,x-year program; or
any reprogramming actions over $ 200,000 on an annua\ cumulative bas,s between IRP
projects in the current year's budget; and
BE n FURTHER RESOLVED that when the General Manager submits an annual proposed IRP
budge't, the tOlal amount of IRP lnternal\y Generated Funds available shall be identified, the proposed
use 0; all or pan 0; these iunas in the proposed IRP shall be provided, and any use of lRP Internally
Generated Funds other. than as included in an approved JRP budgei shall require approval by the Board
Sudgei Committee prior to 5ubmissior, to the Board of Directors; and
SE n FURTHER RESOLVED that any reprogramming aClions below the $ 200,000 threshold will
be identified and inciuded in the quanerly report to the Board Budget Commll1ee; and
BE II FURTHEF. RE SOL'.JED the:! this Resolution supercede:: Resolu~ion #99-64 adopted or;
C'ctcbei 2 E, '19ES and shaH be sifective immediaieiy.
A-28
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 25, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF METROBUS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION FORMULA
#98-27
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel (RMP), created in January 1997, was
charged with devising a plan to stabilize and enhance bus services in the National
Capital Region~ and
• jurisdictions that reduce bus service save more than the resulting system
savings and jurisdictions that increase bus service pay more than the
resulting system increases: and
WHEREAS, the RMP has recommended, and the Board of Directors has agreed,
that a revised Metrobus subsidy allocation formula for regional Metrobus service be
implemented beginning in Fiscal 1999: and
WHEREAS, the Board anticipates that the Member Jurisdictions will agree that
conversion to the new Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula will begin in Fiscal 1999
with phased transition limits during the period of Fiscal 1999-2002 (as previously
I~ /~:':i
~jcenL
Robert L. PolR
Ji1
General Counsel
.~ ... -- ...
D
D
f)
)
PRINCE
,ARLINGTON FAIRFAX FAIRFAX FALLS
GEORGE'S CITVOF CHURCH TOTAL
DISTAIClOF MONTGOMERY CITY COUNTY
AU!XANDRIA COUNTY
COUNTY
=+ COWM81A COUNTY
5" $790.038 $'''.298,200
:J $13,012.890 S44,993 $18,,817.219
$20,349.608 $8,'02.053
rn $17.&&5.a1&
pr I.SUBSIDY 185,135,780
Q !l ~ 2 3' 982800
~
!!l IONAl SUBSIDY .!WU!i i!8!Wl I.ZJ.UB
se,.'I,515 113.012,890 SU.19S 124.124,553 $780p3B 1111,251.000
J S711.t1',1199 S21,II15,51111 Iu,s••."..
.IDA METROBUS SUBSIDY
OJ
o
...CL
m
-
o
Q
.."
CD
o
.....
...o
en
PRESENTED: JUNE 25, 1998
ADOPTED: JULY 9, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NON-REGIONAL METRO BUS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION
#98-32
RESOLUTION
Of THE
BOARD O"F.DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel (RMP), created in January 1997, was
charged with devising a plan to stabilize and enhance bus services in the National
Capital Region; and
WHEREAS, the RMP recommended a new Metrobus service plan based on the
development of regional and non-regional bus routes so that neither the regional bus
subsidy nor any individual jurisdiction's sUbsidy is affected by any change that might
occur in non-regional services except for the jurisdiction proposing the change; and
WHEREAS, Metrobus subsidies are determined separately for regional and non-
regional Metrobus services; and
2. Identify the costs which would accrue for regional Metrobus service if no non-
regional bus service were provided;
4. Divide the costs for non-regional service as computed in step three by total
platform hours for non-regional service;
6. Multiply the platform hours for each jurisdiction by the hourly rate.
The product from the process, as outlined above, equals subsidy by jurisdiction.
? ~ ~ .
(~J).? t/~2 Jh..
Robert L. Polk 7/ {/
General Counsel
"'0::0 fALLS
Q) (1) PRINCE FAIRFAX FAIRFAX
C m CITY OF ARLINGTON CHURCH TOTAL
GEORGE'S CITY COUNTY
(1)2.- DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY
COUNTY COUNrt' ALEXANDRIA COUNTY
--,C COLUMBIA
W
.....' 0 99.01. 0 707.6'6
O
OO:::J 8t,365 203.292 13,308 0
310,577
PLA #t)1 M HOURS SO $45.436.000
SO $6,381.516 .
S85<l,632 SO
$5,22-.470 S13.os3,35O
"9.9_2.132 2 "3 473.2OD)
NON~ IONAL COSTS Q 2 " 114.182)
,aOOlDl
l12Jm ~ S:U.982.onO
~ $5,247,33. SO
NON-~e KlNAL REVENUES S594.4'2 SO SO
\J) 13.930.3.7 19,21••731
S12.97S",9
NIlDa. EGIONAL SUBSIDY
..,
OJ
0-
o
.....
o
=t'
(l)
o,....
()
~,
(~
PRESENTED & ADOPTED: AUGUST 13, 1998
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF INTERJURISDICTIONAL FUNDING AGREEMENT
#98...38
Resolution
.~ of the
Boa'rd of Directors
of the
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
WHEREAS. the WMATA Board of Directors appointed the Regional Mobility Panel, a
group of regional government. business, labor and citizen leaders, in January 1997 and charged
that panel with the responsibility of addressing the concerns expressed by Congress concerning
the rising costs and fragmentation of regional bus services; and
WHEREAS. the Board of Directors reviewed the reports and recommendations of the
Regional Mobility Panel and accepted them for implementation in cooperation with the local
jurisdictions of the Washington metropolitan area;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and Member Jurisdictions have worked to develop an
Inter-Jurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and
F.eplacement Program that will implement the recommendations of the Regional Mobility Panel;
and
WHEREAS. the Agreement will delineate responsibilities for the planning, funding and
service delivery of Regional and Non-Regional Bus Services, estabHsh a new funding formula for
Regional Bus Services similar to the regional Metrorail formuta, create a Coordinated Service
Planning process to provide for the efficient integration of bus services in the Transit Zone, and
provide for certain pledges regarding the adequacy of funding and the maintenance of average
bus passenger fares and Regional bus subsidies through FY 2002 for the same level of Regional
bus service; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the lnter~
Jurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement
Program and authorizes the Chairman of the Board to e)(ecute the Agreement on behalf of the
Authority;
"
#2000-10 .
RESOLUTION
OF THE'
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel directed WMATA to take the lead in
planning the regional bus network; and
WHEREAS, bus ridership has grown as a result of increased demand and the
implementation of fare integration measures, necessitating minor changes to the
regional bus services; and
WHEREAS, in May 1999 the Board of Directors adopted a set of guidelines for
adding service to existing regional Metrobus routes; and .
February 3, 2000
A-40
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
~ Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services
Identifying markets that can support transit and determining how to serve them is a task
that WMATA staff will coordinate with the staff of the jurisdictions. Once a new market is
identified, staff will use passenger demand as the periormance measure for implementing
new service. Passenger demand is determined by estimating the number of passengers
that will utilize the service. Staff will recommend new service as needed as part of the
fiscal year service plan during the budget process. Service will be developed in concert
with local jurisdictions and presented to the' board committees. The recommendation will
include cost. subsidy. and performance goals for 6 months, 12 months, and.
18 months.
One GUideline
The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass
the maximum load point. the number of trips made during the peri"od, and the
number of seats available on a bus. This load factor differential by line type is as
follows:
ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES
As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using
the proposed guidelines.
• Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.
• Performance goals will be set and service will be reviewed every six months
INTRooucnoN
When a bus service overcrowding problem is identified, staff will review existing data or
collect additional data to identify the cause 'of the problem. Then staff will investigate
alternatives to determine if a no cost solution is possible. The following no cost
alternatives are typically used by staff:
Only after it is determined that a no cost alternative does not exist will additional service
be recommended.
Four Guidelines
1. Load Factor
Service will be added if running time is insufficient and more than 33 Dk of the trips
on a linee within a 30 minute period during the peak and 60 minute period during
the off-peak are not able to start their next cycle on-time.
3. Non-peak Productivity
New service, line extensions or other service enhancements to new areas will be
considered as an option to ensure regional equity as determined by relative subsidy
contributions. It is at the boards discretion to consider this option.
ApPUCATION OF GUIDEUNES
As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using
the proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends service improvements I they will first
identify any no cost alternatives. If staff cannot identify any no cost alternatives then the
guidelines win be applied.
I
• Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.
• The specific changes will be proposed.
• The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed.
• The final service change recommendations will be brought to the Board Operations
and Budget Committees only if there is a budget implication.
INTRODUCTlON
When a bus service is identified as a candidate for reduction, staff win review existing data
or collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigate
alternatives to determine if a solution is possible. The foHowing alternatives to reducing
service are typically used by staff:
. Only after 1t is determined that an alternative to reducing service does not exist will a
reduction of service be recommended.
Two guidelines
1. Load Factor
2. Non..peak Productivity
ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES
As part of the on-going planning .process staff will analyze the performance of lines using
the proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends a service reduction they will first
identify any alternatives to reducing service. 'f staff cannot identify any alternatives, then
the guidelines will be applied.
• Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff.
• The changes in s~rvice and the financial impact will be anatyzed.
• The nnal service change recommendations will be brought to the board operations
and budget commiltees only jf there is a budget implication.
#95-14
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
. OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, the Budget Committee, the staffs of the
local jurisdictions and WMAT A staff have over the last several years analyzed the
various faders used to distribute Metrobus and Paratransit costs and revenues, and
the Metrorail sUbsidy.
1995.
I. METROBUS
(a) All fixed costs are charged to the District, the two Maryland Counties, and
Northern Virginia based on the percent distribution of 1975 peak period
buses. Fixed costs are allocated among the Virginia jurisdictions in
proportion to the variable cost allocation whhin Virginia.
Platform miles and platform hours are measured from the time a bus leaves a
garage until it returns to a garage. This data is comp"ed for each route and
route variation and within each jurisdiction where operated. The platform miles
and hours are associated with either a revenue trip (in-service) or a non-revenue
trip (deadhead). All revenue trips are assigned, a ·'dedication" code that
specifies (1) which jurisdiction(s) is charged for the mUes and hours and (2) for
trips serving more than one juriSdiction, how the miles and hours are shared.
The mites and hours for all deadhead trips and layover time on a given bus line
are prorated among the jurisdictions in accordance with each jurisdiction's
share of revenue miles and hours for that line. The sum, by jurisdiction, of an
miles and hours scheduled for regular route service is computed for the fiscal
year, taking into consideration all scheduled service adjustments and funning
time adjustments.
The following' revenue allocation rules have been approved by the Board and are
applied as follows:
• MD base flash pass revenues are assigned to Maryland and VA base flash
pass revenues to Virginia. DC base flash passes may be used for the base
fare in any jurisdiction and revenues are allocated based on Metrobus trip
patterns of users of these passes as determined by the passenger survey.
• The intra-Virginia distribution of the revenues from the VA base pass and
the inHa-Maryland distribution of revenues from the MD base pass also
use the resu\ts from the Bus Passenger Survey.
11. METRORAIL
Two allocation formulas are used to determine the subsidy for each jurisdiction
- the rail subsidy aHocation formula and the max fare subsidy formula.
The max fare subsidy is one-hal1 the revenue difierential between what
riders travelling more than six composite miles actually pay and what they
would have paid without a tapered mileage charge or a fare cap. The max
fare subsidy by jurisdiction is determined from the Metrorail passenger
survey. The charge to each jurisdiction reflects the residence of the riders
receiving the benefit of the reduced peak period fares and the value 01 the
benefit received.
The costs to ~he Authority for providing paratransit services shall be divided
among four tiers:
Fixed costs are continuing fixed overhead costs that do not fluctuate relative
10 the level of paratr ansit service t hat is oper aled. The allocation of fixed costs
will be allocated based on the proportion of ADA-certifications by jurisdiction
of residence of the participating jurisdictions.
Allocated administrative costs are continuing overhead costs that fluctuate and
are related to the level of par atransit service provided. The allocation of
allocated adminisuative costs will be based on actual demand (trips requested)
for the regional paratransit system.
Prior to Fiscal 1995 all costs incurred by the Department of ADA were
distributed by the paratransit formula, regardless of whether the costs were
paratransit costs. Paratransit costs incurred by other departments within the
Authority were not distributed by this formula. In Fiscal 1995, the
paratransit formula was modified to eliminate all departmental restrictions -
all departments can now charge appropriate expenses and staff t!me to
paratransit and the Department of ADA can charge non-paratransit costs to
the other appropriate modes. This is consistent with the way all other
charges are distributed by formula.
# 99-31
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Regional Paratransit Coordinating Committee has reviewed the current t,')ur·
tiered formula used to determine each jurisdiction's share of the MetroAccess subsidy and has
concluded that a new allocation formula is needed; and .
WHEREAS, the Board Budget Committee has reviewed and agrees with changes to the
MetroAccess formula as proposed by the Regional Paratransit Coordinating Committee: and
WHEREAS, the proposed MetroAccess formula more accurately assigns the cost of the
MetroAccess service to the jurisdiction served.
G Direct Costs • the contract carriers' aClual per trip, reservation, and eligibHity
charges will be allocated directly to jurisdictions; and
Overhead Costs - all other costs of the paratransit program will be allocatee; in
proportion to the direct costs: and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Northern Virginia jurisdictions of Arlington and Fairfax
COIJnties, and the Chies of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church have determined an appropriate
pr ocedure for WMAT A to further allocate costs within Northern Virginia:
• Direct Costs· per trip charges will be adjusted to reflect the average time of :rips
provided for each jurisdiction; and
Overhead Costs· these costs will be allocated within Nonhern Virginia based on the
direct costs as calculated for each jurisdiction; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall become effective for fiscal 200(~ and
shell remain in effect for subsequent fiscal years unless changed by the Board of Directors; and
Cheryl C. B'ur'ke c .
General C4~nsel
#2003·20
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, On June 21, 2001, the Board of Directors adopted a Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) consisting of the Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP), the System
Access/Capacity Program (SAP) and the System Expansion Program (SEP); and
WHE.REAS, A formula for the allocation of subsidy under the IRP was previously
adopted; and
WHEREAS, The SAP and SEP contain non-reimbursable projects but no allocation
formula has been adopted; now, therefore, be it
RESOL VED, That the sUbsidy for non-reimbursable rail projects in the SAP and SEP
shall be allocated for any given year according to the percentage share for each
jurisdiction of subsidy allocated to IRP rail projects, and for bus projects to the
percentage share of subsidy allocated to IRP bus projects; and it is further
~003-50
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, By resolution #97-35 the Board established a $7.9 million reserve to provide a
contingency for potential shortfalls in federal operating assistance; and
WHEREAS. The Authority experienced a $3.3 million budget shortfall, sUbject to audit, in FY03
due primarily to excess expen~ and revenue tosses associated with the record Presidents Day
snowstonTl, as well as lower than planned tourist ridership; and
WHEREAS, The Authority has requested reimbursements from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency to offset eligible expenses associated with the snow storm, as weU as from the
Office for Domestic Emergency Preparedness to offset extra security costs during the war in Iraq, but
will not likely receive these funds until FY2004 or beyond; now, therefore. be it
RESOL.VED, That the WMATA Board approves the conversion of the existing reserve for loss
of federal operating assistance into an operating reserve. to be used only upon approval of the Board;
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the WMATA Board authorizes the continued financial support of this
reserve such that it will. when feasible, be maintained at a balance not to exceed 1% of the current
year operating expense budget; and be it further
RESOLVED. That if. at the end of any fiscal year. the Operating Budget concludes with a .
SUbsidy surplus, the first distribution of said surplus shall be directed to this reserve in orider to satisfy
the authorized balance; and be it further .
:
RESOL VED. That the WMATA Board authorizes the use of the aforementioned reserve to
offset the FY03 operating budget shortfall of apprOXimately $3.3 million. subject to audit; and be it
further
RESOL VED, That any reimbursements received to cover prior year operating! costs will be
reported to the Board and used to replenish the reserve; and be it further !
RESOL VED. That the status of this reserve shall be reviewed with the Board as part of the
budget review and approval process; and be it further
1194-35
RESOLUT10N i
OF THE ~
BOARD OF D1RECTORS 1
OF THE
I
!
VlASH1NGTON METROPOL1T AN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY ~
1
\VHEREAS. under accrual accounting costs are recorded at the time sen'ices are received I
regardless of the fiscal year in which they are budgeted: and !
1
1
\VHEREAS .•he \VMATA Compact requires that funds be identified for the full amounl of a \
contract at tim e of award: and
\VHEREA S, this requires the budgeting of all funds for the contract in the fiscal year in which
the contract is a,,,"arded and additional funds in future fiscal years if services are not received in the" fiscal
year in which they are initially budgeted.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VEO that the Board of Directors approves a modification
to the A uthority's accrual accounting procedures to provide for recording the costs of one lime~ non-
recurring. professipnal and technical sen'ices contracts at time of contraci award; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED thai [his resolulion shall be effective beginning in Fiscal 1995.
Robert L. Polk
General Counsel
I •
#2002-30
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received the comments of the local
jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2003 Operating Budget, and;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received the requests of the local
jurisdictions in establishing the Fiscal 2003 Reimbursable Operating Projects, and;
A-58
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board revises resolution #84-54,
adopted on July 26, 1984, which established a claims reserve for workers'
compensation and third party liability claims, to also in include provisions for
employee claims in the reserve, and to revise the size of the reserve from all
outstanding liabilities to only the liability for claims expected to be paid in the
budget year, as well as a sufficient amount to permit the reserve' to pay large
claims or foreseeable annual claim variations in any budget year without
exceeding the amount available in the reserve, and;
Cheryl C. 8'y~-ke
I,
General Counsel
#2000-35
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, Article VI, Section 13(a), of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
Authority Compact states: liThe Board shall develop and adopt, and may from time to time
review and revise, a mass transit plan for the immediate and long-range needs of the
Zone[.]"; and
WHEREAS, the population, employment and demand for transit within the Transit
Zone has grown substantially in the last 30 years, requiring better transit operations in
unserved and underserved areas and in new commercial. residential, and entertainment
activity centers; and
WHEREAS, in April 1999, the Board of Directors in Resolution #99-14 adopted the
Transit Service Expansion Plan covering a 25-year planning horizon, which is comprised
of a program of transit investments falling within the following four major elements:
WHEREAS, in cooperation with its local, state, regional and federal partners, the
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority will continue to advance critical projects
to support transportation needs and economic development in the region and contribute
to the quality of life of its residents~ and
• The operating deficit of an Extension will be allocated among all the Compact
member jurisdictions in accordance with the formula in effect for the funding of
the Metrorail operating deficit in the years that such deficit occurs.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board finds that the proper and timely
performance of its function requires that this resolution be effective immediately.
heryl C. Burke
General Counsel
PROPOSED
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, from time to time tne Authority is called upon to provide assistance
and services on behalf of the local jUrisdictions, state governments, and other entities;
and
WHEREAS, over the past several years, the number and complexity of
reimbursable project requests have oeen increasing so as to require a definitive set of
policy guidelines for recommenorng s~ch requests to the Board Budget Committee for
review and to the Board of Directors tor approval; and
Page 1 of 4
A-62 Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
2. That upon request by a local jurisdiction, state government, or other
entity, the General Manager shall present to the Board Budget Committee
for review and to the Board of Directors for approval, a project
description, staffing, funding and ,duration of each request for a
reimbursable project; except the i c;3eneral Manager may approve
Reimbursable Projects with participating jurisdictions and state
governments, provided that such projects do not require additionai
positions and do not exceed $ 200,000; and the Board will be notified in
advance of such actions; and
3. That the General Manager shall ensure that staffing and funding for a
Reimbursable Project· will be available so as to not require any staff or
funds from the operating, capital improvement program or rail capital
budgets or subsidies; and
5. That pricing for all Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts with an arrears
payment schedule will include the cost of money; and
7. That the funds for Reimbursable Projects are payable within 30 days
after the billing date. and all accounts that are not paid by the 31 st day
after billing are considered delinquent and will be assessed a late
payment penalty and interest charge, except that the Authority will be
responsible for any billing errors; and
Page 2 of 4
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors A-63
10. That the Board authorizes and directs the use of the $1.0 million new
service reserve, established by Resolution #98-14, to establish the
Reimbursable Project Reserve; and
12. That the General Manager is authorized, in the event that the
Reimbursable Project Reserve balance is inadequate. to borrow from the
Operating Claims Reserve, such borrowed funds to be repaid with
interest as reimbursable program funds become available: and
16. That the General Manager is authorized, in the event that the
Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve balance rs
inadequate for insurance deductibles, to borrow from the Operating
Claims Reserve, sucn corrowed funds to be repaid with interest as
reimbursable program tunas become available: and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that the General Manager will provide to the Board
Budget Committee the Policyllnstructlon sening forth the procedures for Reimbursable
Services/PrOJects and Reimbursable Frxed Price Contracts;
A-64
BE IT FUR~HER RESOLVED, that the General Manager shall submit to the Board
Budget Committee a quarterly report on the status of the Reimbursable
Services/Projects and Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts; and
~J:.FY2000\RESOLUTN.,elmDursable4.wDO
Page 4 of 4
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors A-65
PRESENTED 8& ADOPTED: August 10, 2000
SUBJECT: Revised Policy on Transit Infrastructure Investment Fund
#2000.. 50
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
1. Equity capital for the TliF will be provided from uncommitted proceeds
as a result of the sale or long-term lease, as appropriate, of real estate
transactions approved under the Joint Development Program, and that
all funds to be deposited in the TlIF will be subject to Board approval;
2. Any balance of funds in the TIlF will be used, with Board approval, and
in conformity with Compact requirements, any applicable FTA approvals
and other financial documents existing at any given time:
4. The first thirty million dollars of funds deposited into TtlF will be
allocated for use on a subregional basis in accordance with the raU
construction formula in existence at the time the funds are received by
the Authority as described in 3 above;
A-66
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
5. After the initial allocation of funds as described above, the balance of
funds in the TIIF will be .allocated to non·operating expenses as
approved by the Board.
7. AnV pay back revenues generat~d from a TlIF funded project shall be
deposited back into the TIIF;
9. The status of the TItF will be reponed to the Board of Directors quarterly
through the Development and Expansion Committee; and
112002·44 .
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, On August 10.2000. the Board of Directors adopted a revised policy on the
Transit Jnfrastructure Investment Fund (TIlF); and
WHEREAS, The first $30 million of funds deposited into the TIlF have been allocated for
use on a sUbregional basis in accordance with the rail construction formula in existence at
the time the funds were received by the Authority; and .
WHEREAS, It is projected that an additional $54.4 minion will be available in the TIIF from
fiscal 2003 through fiscal 20~7; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That 01 the $54.4 million projected, an addi1ional $30 million shaH be made
available for use on a subregional basis in accordance with the rail construction formula
in existence at the time the funds are received by the Authority; and be it further
RESOL VED, That $9 million of Marylandts share of the additional $30 million made
available on a subregional basis shall be made available and applied to the Largo
extension; and be it further
RESOL VED, That the balance of TIIF funds projected to be received from fiscal 2003-
2007, approximately $24.4 million, be allocated to fund the following three critical projects:
1) Regional Fare Integration (SmarTrip) for $9.6 minion, 2) a third eNG facility to be located
in Maryland for $11.8 minion, and 3) design of Precision Stopping for rail cars to anow for
eight car train operation for $3 million; and be it further
RESOL VED, That if furids are not available at the time of project obligation, funds may be
borrowed from any reserve to the extent that funds are available beyond those required
to meet the reserve needs, and shall be repaid to that reserve with interest from the
program or project that borrowed the funds; and be it further
$31,525. 4 60
( '02 Ending Balance
(/)
51,756,525
~ '03 Projected Revenues
....r.: $39.281.985
o·
:J
in ($30,OOO,OOO)
d\ Isd;ctional Reserve. - 1st Subregklnal Allocation
.~
$16.182.750 S13,817.250
lals 100.0% $30.000.000
Remainfng balance
unobligated by
Total
Obligations Jurisdlcllon
Jurisdiction Allocation
$0 510.800,000
istrict of Columbia 38.0 & D $10.800.000
(tl $2,100.000
$11.100.000 S9.000.000
Maryland 31.0%
SO $8.100.000
VIf1 Inta 27.0% 58.100,000
Eiscal vear IQIaI JO Revenue Ooeralino Funds ~ TilE Lease Rev. TilE Sale Rev.
NOTES: 1. An addillonal $8 million r85etVed for conslrudion of White Flint garage in '05
2. $17 rnJlJJon of the tolal Is stilI In Term Sheet stago. nol under contract
3. All FV revenue totalS. '04 10 '07" do not Include eamed Interest
4. ·Current cash avalfab1e· projected ror FY 03-
CURRENTLY AVAILABLE $6.225.460
Amount avaitabte end of 2nd quarter $175.000
Amount avaDable end of 3rd quarter St,289.858
Amount avsDable end of 4th Quarter $1,591.668
$9.281.985
PRESENTED AND ADOPTED: September 16,2004
2004-43
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD BUDGETCOMMITTEE
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, The approved FY 05 operating budget did not include the expense
associated with a $2,000,000 cost containment under which joint development activities
are funded with TIIF funds; and
VJ'HEREAS, This action resulted in a $2,000,000 expense and revenue being unbudgeted;
and
RESOLVED, That the FY05 operating expense be increased by $2,000,000 to account for
the plalUled Joint development activities; and be it further
RESOL VED, That the FY05 operating revenue be increased by $2,000,000 of TIIF funds
to offset the budgeted expense for the joint development activities; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors approves the Amended Fiscal 2005 Operating
Budget providing for revenues of $541 ,468~850; operating expenses of $943,683,200 and
an operating subsidy requirement of $402,214,350; and be it further
Carol B. O'Keeffe /? I t.
Acting General Counsel ~../
#2004·01
RESOLUTJON
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, The standing committees of the Board of Directors are the (1) Budget
Committee (which also sits as the Audit Committee as needed); (2) Operations and Safety
Committee; (3) Planning, Development and Administration Committee; (4) Real Estate
Committee; and (5) Pension Committee; and
RESOLVED, That the Chairmen of Board Committees. after consultation with the General
Manager/Chief Executive Officer, shall approve appropriate staff support, and be it further
RESOLVED, That the BUDGET COMMITTEE of the WMATA Board of Directors shall be
responsible for:
* The Capital Improvement Program includes the Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP),
the System Expansion Program (SEP) and System Access/Capacity Program (SAP)
Budgets.
-1-
A-74 Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
(5) Reviewing all Reprogramming actions, as defined below:
(c) Any action which meets the threshold for Board approval and
results in a cumulative increase of $200,000 in operating funds
during the fiscal year:
1. from other than the category in which it is budgeted; or
2. from other than the department in which it is budgeted; or
3. in excess of the amount budgeted for any given category
in any department; and
(7) Considering policies and programs for setting fares and creating fare
structures, including fare simplification, regional integration, interchange-
ability with other providers, parking fees and parking fee structures;
(10) Monitoring and r'eviewing Authority finances to ensure that all projects
and proposed expenditures are represented in a dUly approved
Authority budget;
-2-
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors A-75
therefrom or on any other significant instances of misconduct,
mismanagement, waste, fraud or abuse~
(f) Reviewing the Office of the Auditor General Quarterly Report to the
Board; conducting further inquiries as necessary;
RESOLVED, That the OPERATIONS AND SAFETY COMMITTEE of the WMATA Board
of Directors shall have the following functional responsibilities:
(1) Oversight and monitoring of all rail and bus service planning and delivery
issues inclUding the snow emergency plan and Authority-proposed service
reconfigurations;
(3) Oversight of the development of new technologies associated with rail, bus,
and passenger interface including changes in equipment specifications such
as seating configuration, etc.;
(4) Oversight of the review of existing Authority operational programs and the
formulation of recommendations for the imprementation of major operational
program and policies for Board consideration, as well as oversight of the
implementation of major operational programs and policies approved by the
Board;
-3-
A-76 Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
Regulations;
(9) Periodic review of various safety training programs and management safety
practices to determine adequacy;
(10) Examination of WMATA's safety agreements with local fire and rescue
service organizations for the purpose of investigating emergency response
capability;
(11) Review of security and Transit Police matters on behalf of the Board of
Directors;
(12) Receipt and review of a variety of accident and incident reports to be both
informed to the status of these incidents and to insure that proper staff
corrective actions have been taken to prevent similar future occurrences;
(15) Review of legislation which might impact WMATA system safety, and make
policy recommendations to the Board as appropriate;
.4.
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors A-77
(16) (nterface with various external safety organizations, such as COG Fire
Chiefs, APTA safety groups, and the UJTP to encourage the exchange of
I
(17) Assess the adequacy of WMATA life safety systems and identifies matters
needing further investigation;
(18) Review of policies and procedures for informing the public about WMATAfs
safety policies and practices;
and be it further
(1) Formulation of poHcy guidance for the completion of both the 89.5 and 103-
mile systems;
(3) Monitoring compliance with the provisions ofthe full-funding agreements with
FTA to include consideration of amendments to the agreements as
necessary and appropriate;
(4) Ensuring that time fines and goals associated with New York Avenue and
Larg.o Extension construction are achieved;
(5) Review of policy for the resolution of contract disputes associated with the
construction program, including review and approva~ of major contract
modifications;
(8) Monitoring and oversight of the adopted program for the expansion beyond
the 106 mile system and a strategy for achieving same;
.5.
A-78 Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
(10) Coordinating the WMATA role in the decision process with the Council of
Governments (COG) and the Transportation Planning Board (TPB) to reflect
the changed requirements and authorities created by the lntermodaf
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1990 and the Clean Air Act;
(11) Projecting long-term service levels, including ridership projections and future
fiscal impacts~
(13) Working with local governments, APTA, and the federal government on
transit legislation, regulation and funding, including such issues as increased
tax-free employer subsidy of employee transit fares, federal appropriations,
and reauthorization of the Transportation Equity Act forthe 21 s.t Century; and
(15) Act as the Authority's oversight committee on all human resource matters
including Affirmative Action/Equal Employment Opportunity (AAlEEO)
programs; diversity initiatives; and, other related personnel policy and
procedures;
and be it further
(2) Review and recommend to the Board of Directors Real Estate Acquisitions
(fee simple and lease) in the amount of $250,000 or higher which have not
been previously approved by the Board of Directors as part of a specific line
expansion or facility project;
(3) Review and recommend to the Board of Directors Real Estate Dispositions
(sales and leases) where the estimated fair market value exceeds $100 1 000;
and be it further
RESOLVED, That the PENSJON COMMITTEE shaJi be responsible for the general
oversight of all WMATA-sponsored Retirement Plans; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Chairman also may establish ad hoc committees as needed, with the
concurrence of the Board; and be it further
RESOLVED. That on rare occasions and under special circumstances, an item that
would normally be reviewed and forwarded to the Board of Directors by the
appropriate Committee may be presented as an Administrative Action directly to the
Board. with the concurrence of the relevant Committee Chairman; and. be it finally
(1w Ii /(w/{ ~_ _
Cheryl C. Burke. Gener~eounsr
-7-
A-80 Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
f"
~2000-42
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cheryl C. urke
General ounsel
F. Contract Awards:
NOTE i: ~ot\\'ithstandingthe above, the General ~1anager has the authority to incur
ob"ligations in emergency situations, and will Tepon back to the Board on ail
emergency procurements within 60 days ofthe aClion. Emergency is defined
as a situation (such as a flood, epidemic, riot: equipment failure: or other
reason declared by the General I\1anager) which creates an immediate threat
to the public health, welfare or safety. The existence of an emergency
condition creales an immediate need for supplies t se~:ices or construction
which cannOl be met through normal procurement methods, and the lack of
'which would seriously threaten ehhe:- the health or safety of any person, the
Revised 5!O_1/0~} .
A-83
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
preservation or protection of property, or the continuation of necessary
.At. uthority functions.
Professional and TeclmicaJ (P&T) sen'ices includes but is not limited to labor
NOTE 2:
and services provided by attorneys, accountants: appraisers, arbiters, auditors,
investment bankers, compuler service companies, architect/engineering firms,
management consultants, and transit industry consultants.
Revised 5/01/00
:>
I
00
lh
·
t 'TIVrrV 1~I~QI.JlI~IN(; II()AJ~I) DOLLAR l·IJR":SI·IOI.~O· CURI{EN1- 1)(lI,I.Alt l·"'ltl~SIIOLI) - 1'ltOll()SI~O n,·
, IJI~()VAL "rll E Gf\'I(;I~
ConCretet Awards:
:> I. A II 1110<li I1catinns for C(luiplllcnl Over $2()O,n,~n A. Fur Ucmrd Approved l~onlrClcls:
I
~ supplic2'. scn'ic~t construction and I O·~~. of fhe nriginnl :lflprnvccl C0l1lnll~1
CD
rn rcnl cSlale including exercise of v~llu..: nr $200.. 0Un. \vhichc\'cr is: lu,,"c.·,
o
('l'l10115. CXCCJl1 n~ notcd helow n. For Non..lJnill'll Apllrnvcd Conll'acts:
E
.-
o ·fhe CUl1l1llativc vuluc of the ()rigitl&ll cnnlrucC
=:s
rn cnul all rilCldificnl iCln~ c:xcc("cI~ $1 nn.ooo.
o
~
8=' 2. Any nlodificalion exceeding the ()vcr Budge.
CD
tt1 aUlhorized budgel including
o cnnlingcncy. if any.
a
~ .l. Any budgeted 1110di licalion to Unitrd Appro\'al nol Required Nn ("hangc
t:1
..... exercise a conlract option when the
.....
CD nplinll was cvalu:llcd as part of the
.....
(")
hasis of u\vard and Board apilfoval
o
fA \ViIS Ilrnvidcd as pari or 1he inilial
("vard.
#2003-08
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, Metro has completed the construction journey of the 103-mile Adopted
Regional System (ARS), and a new vision for the future is needed; and
WHEREAS, The region's population and employment levels continue to grow at rates that
are above national averages, and increasing traffic congestion severely threatens the $240
billion regional economy, challenging business vitality and raising quality of life issues for
all residents; and
WHEREAS, At the same time, the region remains a non-attainment area for ozone and
continues to have "Code Red" days when the region's air quality is unhealthy; and the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has recently designated the region
from a serious non-attainment area to a severe non-attainment area; and
WHEREAS, The importance of a fully capitalized transit system has taken on even greater
meaning due to homeland security considerations: and
WHEREAS, In July 2001, the United States General Accounting Office (GAO), after a
comprehensive study of WMATA's operations and management. recommended that
WMATA develop a comprehensive and priority-based capital program; and
WHEREAS, The 2003 timetable for Congress to re-authorize federal surface transportation
funding under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21) has focused
attention on the need for a defined set of regional transit· priorities; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Directors recently adopted the WMATA Strategic Plan. of which
the WMATA 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan is the first product; and
WHEREAS, The WMATA 10-Year Capital Improvement Plan offers the region the first
comprehensive, prioritized transit plan developed to maintain the integrity of the existing
capital plant and rolling stock; provide adequate system access and capacity growth to
maintain Metro's share of trip making in the region; and prioritizes future expansion
projects to link areas of the region not currently served by fixed guideway transit; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVEDJ That the Board of Directors recognizes the lack of existing financial capacity
to support the plan in its entirety; and be ~t further
RESOL VED, That the Board of Directors directs the General Manager/Chief Executive
Officer to develop and pursue a funding strategy that comprehensively includes federal,
state, and local partners. and particularly addresses the Authority's strategy for
incorporating the region's transit investment needs in the pending reauthorization of the
federal surface ·transportation funding bill; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors has identified three urgent capital priorities as
indicated in the Attachment; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Board of Directors recognizes the capital requirements to fund the
. remaining unfunded components of the FY04-09 Infrastructure Renewal Program to be
$274.5 minion: and be it further
RESOL VED, That the Board of Directors recognizes the capital requirements to fund the
remaining unfunded components of the Metrorail SAP to be $625.1 minion to support the
purchase of 120 Series 6000 rail cars and ancUlary facilities and systems necessary to
support the initial phase of 8-car train operations: and be it further
RESOL VED1 That the Board of Directors recognizes the capital requirements to fund the
remaining unfunded components of the Metrobus SAP to be $171.0 million to support the
purchase of 185 buses and anci1lary facilities and equipment necessary for expanded
transit bus service: and be it finatty
A-90
Appendix A - Resolutions of the Board of Directors
·WMAT A FY04-09
Un-funded Urgent
Capital Priorities
Introduction
• In November 2002, the WMATA Board of Directors adopted the 10~Year Capitallmprovemenl Plan
as the first comprehensive, prioritized transit plan developed to maintain the integrity of the existing
capital plant and rolling stock of the Metrobus and Metrorail systems. The plan also provides
adequate system access and capacity growth to maintain current transit market share in the future,
and an appropriate level of system expansion to reach new transit markets.
II At the time of adoption, the Board recognized that the plan, while representing the appropriate vision
for transit investment over the next' 0 years, lacked an adequate funding base under current
economic conditions in the metropolitan area.
• As a first step in realizing the vision of the elP within the reality of current funding constraints, the
I
both Melrorail and Metrobus SAP and just over 25 percent of the 10-year SAP funding need for each
system.
• Annual Differences
Requirements
II Rail Cars
Contract options for the current Series 6000 Alstom rail cars allow for the purchase of an
additional 120 rail cars. Under the current Alslom contract, Option 1 (50 rail cars) must be
executed by November 2004, with delivery in FY 2005, and Oplion 2 (70 rail cars) requires
execution by May 2005, with delivery in FY 2006.
Maintenance Facilities
42 additional maintenance spaces are needed in the system to accommodate the additional 120
rail cars. A total of 168 maintenance spaces are required, compar.ed to 126 today.
Results
• Rail Cars
Upon delivery of the 120 cars, WMATA will have sufficient capacity to operate 34 percent peak
period trains eight*car trains. The remaining 66 percent of trains would operate as six-car
consists. The additional 120 rail cars provide adequate capacity to absorb projected moderate
growth through 2012, at which time all trains would reach their crowding threshold.
• Maintenance Facilities
New Carrollton: 20 additional maintenance spaces in 2006 to bring the system total to 146. A
minimum of 142 are required system-wide, with complete delivery of the 192 of the 5000 Series
CAF cars in 2003. The New Carrollton project as described here does not include $37.0 million
funded in FY02-03 for minimal shop-building improvements. Additional funds are required to
complete the shop expansion for fully functional capability. (Note comparison to Shady Grove for
size and cost.)
BrentwoodlGreenbelt: 12 additional maintenance spaces in 2006 to bring the system total to 158.
A minimum of 157 are required system-wide, with delivery of the first 48 of the 6000 Series and
50 of the Option 1 Aistom cars in 2005.
§~ady Grove: 16 additional maintenance spaces in 2006 to bring the system total to 174. A
minimum of 168 are required system*wide, with delivery of the 70 Series 6000 Option 2 cars in
2006.
Requirements
• Buses
The Regional Bus Study recommended a comprehensive set of short· and long-term service
strategies to enhance existing services in underserved markets. The 'allowing bus procurement
program identifies funding requirements to purchase 185 buses for expanded bus services.
I r FY 04 FY 05! FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Total
rBuses
!
I I
!Growth Buses
I
I $0.0 $15.9 $15.9 515.9 $18.1 $18.1 $83.8
~SU8TOTAL (5FY03m) I SO.O $15.9! $15.9 $15.9 518.1 $18.1 583.8 •.
I
• Bus Garage
Metrobus storage and maintenance capacity in the region can absorb 217 more buses (15
percent). However, that capacity is not distributed evenly across the region: District (57);
Maryland (124); Virginia (26)
• Customer Facililies
The Regional Bus Study identified several needed safety and access improvements to passenger
facilities throughout the region. Specifically, the following needs are identified:
• Safe and secure access and facilities; Enhanced customer amenities; Improved bus system
image and visibility; Improved transfer environment; Coordinated and consistent facilities
across the legion. Approximately 2.800 WMATA stops have been identified for safety and
access improvements across the region. Initial efforts will be to more fully develop the
regional safety improvement program and identify specific requirements at each location.
Transit Center Requirements
• Off-street bus bays; Real-time and ITS-driven kiosk information; Fare media sales; Protected
pedestrian access with sheltered wailing areas; park/kiss and ride facilities; Telephone; Taxi
stand; Focal point for transit system (entrance to system); Transit friendly development.
Results
• Buses
The additional neet vehicles will allow the Authority to sustain minimum customer growth
requirements by adding needed capacity in existing markets and allowing the Authority \0
penetrate the highest priority developing markets not currently served by bus.
• Garage
The additional bus maintenance and storage capacity will anow WMATA to store the vehicles
required to provide the family of seNiee solutions recommended in the Regional Bus StUdy.
The cost estimate accommodates alternative fuel requirements.
• CU,storner Facilities
Bus Stops and Transit Center enhancements are of vital importance for a coordinated regional
bus strategy to improve customer safety, information systems for cus'om~1 system access.
operating efficiency, and service provider connections.
#2002·46
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, In Oc1ober2001 the Board of Directors directed that staff prepare a Strategic Plan
in order to guide WMATA toward the realization of a renewed vision of mobility, accessibility, growth
and opportunity in the National Capital Region over the opening decade of the 21 s' century; and
WHEREAS, The elements of the Strategic Plan has been closely coordinated with the Board
of Directors, regional stakeholders and senior staff and outlines a renewed vision of transportation and
travel, of mobility and accessibility, and of growth and opportunity for the National Capital Region~ and
1) The already enormous value of the public transportation investment must be protected
and increased to meet the needs of a growing region; and
2) Growth in the region requires that the system continue to expand and that service quality
be sustained; and
3) Increased investment and continued· improvement in governance and management
processes will be necessary to accomplish these ends; and
WHEREAS r five strategic goals form the basis for the execution of the Strategic Plan:
1) SERVICE QUALITY AND RIDERSHIP GROWfH
2) SAFETY AND SECURITY '
3) BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
4) REGIONAL ROLE
5) NAT10NAL RELATIONSHIPS; and
WHEREAS, The Strategic Plan lays out a vision for WMATA as a fully integrated regional
system, maintained in a state of good repair, that brings high quality, reliable service to customers who
benefit from transit access across the region; and
WHEREAS, The Strategic Plan represents a renewable, long·lerm contract between Metro
riders and stakeholders describing what must be accomplished on behalf of the region and the nation
in the decades ahead and identifying measures of progress and performance to establish
accountability for the Plan:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, That the Board of Directors approves the Strategic
Plan (Attachment 1) and directs that it be used as basic guidance for system planning, annual
business planning, budgeting for operations, capital programming, and performance monitoring and
measurement; and
FV 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Tolal
81 ars
6000 series Rail Cars Options 1225.5
• 81 als m
SUBTOTAL· Rail Cars (SYOEm) $0.0 S237.8 50.0 $0.0 so.o $0.0 $237.8
SUBTOTAL. METRORAIL SAP ($FY03m) $16.0 $405.9 591.7 $73.0 $0.0 $0.0 $586.6
SUB TOTAL· METRORA1L SAP (oS YOEm) $115.5 $428. T S99.3 $81.2 $0.0 $0.0 05625.1
FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Tolal
uses
Growth Buses $18.1 583.8
Garages
Virginia· New (125 spaces) $3.0 $36.4 $2.1 $1.3 542.8
SUBTOTAL· Garages tSFY03m) $0.0 50.0 $3.0 536.4 $2.1 $1.3 $42.8
• SUBTOTAL· Garages ($ YOEm) 050.0 SO.O '3.2 $40.5 $2.4 $1.5 $47.7
Customer Facilities
Safely Improvements at SlOps (2.800) 51.3 S1.3 $1.3 $1.3 $1.3 S6.5
Transit Centers wIlTS $4.1 ~.1 S4.1 $4.1 $4.1 S20.3
.
ransl en ers m
SUBTOTAL· Trans;' Cen'ers (SYOEm) SO.O $5.6 15.8 $15.0 $6.1 $6.3 $29.8
SUBlOT AL • BUS SAP (SFY03m) 50.0 $21.2 S24.2 557.6 $25.6 $24.8 5153.4
SUBTOTAL· SUS SAP (SYOEm) $0.0 $22.4 !26.2 $64.' $29.3 S29.1 $171.0
TOT AL • METRORAIL AND METROBUS SAP (SFY03m) $16.0 5427.1 $115.9 $130.6 525.6 524.8 $740.0
TOTAL· METRORAIL AND METROBUS SAP ($ YOEm) S16.5 .$450.5 $125.5 $145.3 $29.3 129.1 $796.1