Title Mortgage Servicer

Whats in a title? Could it be admitting to a title could be fatal? NIMROD True and Accurate

Most of those who have a slight understanding of the fraud that is perpetuating have some degree of comprehension of what a name implies. Consider that the contents of affidavits introduced into court a few years ago have morphed into a different method and means to argue an issue. Correct, this writer did say ARGUE. Even when an affidavit achieves being a declaration, the contents require scrutiny to determine accuracy. Years ago, Pulitzer noted three facts were required in writing; Accuracy, Accuracy and Accuracy. Times have changed but the principles of accuracy are still relevant today even if such accuracy requires Precision, Precision and Precision. The basic principles of method and means of precision fall back onto the original requirement for accuracy. This writer is aware that there are ones who want to get directly to the meat and bypass the potatoes, my apology to those meat people but there are newly found potato people searching for the recipe.

On with soup making: Affidavit/Declaration. Still common in the banks counsel pleadings you find a affidavit or now appearing declaration still stating the same equivalent argue as the prior affidavits but appears to have added and rearranged wording. With a Declaration one offers into the record information under penalty of perjury, really want to go to jail for lying to a court, doubt it. In the rewording found in todays revised Declarations it is still found that the Affiant/Declator is claiming the party presenting the document is a Mortgage Servicer. Call yourself what you want, Nimrod, Mortgage Servicer, time to take the innards of the document and apply outside reality to the document. Mortgage Servicer for who; the document does not identify a principle. Secondly, the newly utilized documents still do not override Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Hearsay, 802, 803. Correct that the document notes the submitter references to a True and Correct COPY of what is within a computer system but fails to provide evidence that the True and Correct is True and ACCURATE. Legally it would be legally impossible for a party reviewing only the records of a computer system to testify that the contents were True and Accurate. Could it be to make one run like hell would only require requesting them to testify under oath subject to perjury that the contents of the computer are True and Accurate?