Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In mining, damage to a rock mass is unavoidable. The objective is to minimise its extent, severity and its impact
The Paradox:
We want to totally destroy the competence of one area without damaging the neighbouring area !
Perimeter/Contour holes
Easer holes
(stoping holes) Drive height
Cut holes
Grade line (Relief and charged holes)
Centre line
Care must also be taken to the potential damage caused by adjacent rows to the contour (inner easer holes)
Explosive energy per meter of blasthole reduced Blasthole spacing is approximately 75% of the spacing for stripping holes within the round Blasthole burden is approximately 1.1 to 1.4 times the spacing around the perimeter (pre-splitting effect) Smooth blasting charges should ideally be initiated simultaneously, to create a clean break between blastholes
Blasthole deviation
Variability in the toe position for a round with a total drill deviation of 4 degrees Variability in the toe position for a round with a total drill deviation of 2 degrees
Inaccurate drilling
Cumulative drilling errors
Collaring automatics
After rock detect, collaring proceeds with collaring pressures to set collaring depth Then power ramped to normal drilling pressures
QA/QC
A formal set of procedures that allows the systematic collection of data that supports the implementation of recommended designs for different environments The main components are
Site inspections and data logging Data storage and management Data analysis and reporting (feedback to miners)
Rock conditions
SG UCS (MPa) Tensile Strength (MPa) 12 E (GPa) Poisson's ratio 0.24 Vp (m/s)
2.66
300
73
5800 100
Trim blasting
In trim blast designs, production blast designs are modified to reduce wall damage. The common modifications are:
a free face is created for horizontal relief; the pattern width is reduced to three to six rows deep; the delay sequence is modified to control vibration levels and displacement; and sub-drilling is reduced or eliminated above the catch berm. The last row of holes is placed in front of the designed batter face. This is known as the standoff distance.
(Chitombo, Onederra and Scott, 2006)
Buffer blasting
In buffer blasting the relationship between explosive energy distribution, confinement and level can be enhanced with the use of airdecks, pattern modifications and/or reduced hole diameters Buffer blasts are typically three to five rows wide and shot to free face that has a consistent burden. In some adverse geology, additional rows may have to be added to the blast to protect the slope from damage caused by the production blast Batter face angles between 60 and 75 degrees are fairly typical for cushion blast designs
4m
6m
5m
165 mm
7m
(Enaex, 2001)
Stemming - 4 m
10 m
Air bag at 4 m
Anfo- 68 Kg 4m
B940 - 51 Kg 2m
J = 1.5 m
Buffer
6m
(Enaex, 2001)
Blasthole Diameter (mm) 76 89 102 114 127 153 165 200 229 270 311
Charge (kg/m) 0.6 0.75 0.9 1.2 1.4 2 2.3 3.4 4.6 6 7.8
Burden (m) 1.7 1.9 2 2.4 2.6 3.1 3.3 4.1 5 5.5 6.1
Spacing (m) * 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2 2.4 2.6 3.1 3.5 4.1 4.8
Offest From Toe (m) 0.30 0.36 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.61 0.66 0.80 0.92 1.08 1.24
* spacing may need to be half the inner buffer row spacing to aid with pattern tie-in.
(Floyd, 2006)
2-3m 4m
115 165 mm
3m
6m
5m
165 mm
7m
(Enaex, 2001)
2 m from collar
Stemming - 4 m
10 m
Anfo - 100 Kg 6m
Anfo- 68 Kg 4m
J = 1.5 m
Buffer
6m
(Enaex, 2001)
Blasthole Diameter (mm) 76 89 102 114 127 153 165 200 229 270 311
Charge (kg/m) 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.2
Spacing (m) 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.8 3.2 3.8 4.4
no stem
no stem
(Floyd, 2006)
Pre-split fracture
(Floyd, 2006)
Crest damage
(Bye, 2006)
Structurally controlled
-2
-1
blasthole locations
1
desired crest
standoff zone
(Floyd, 2006)
SENIOR GEOTECH
SURVEY
Monitoring Staking Limits
BLASTING TECHNICIAN
WALL CONTROL SUPERVISOR
ASSISTENT BLASTERS
X2
SCALING OPERATORS
4 SHIFT
DRILL OPERATOR
DRILL OPERATOR
DRILL OPERATOR
DRILL OPERATOR
DRILL ASSIT.
DRILL ASSIT.
DRILL ASSIT.
DRILL ASSIT.
DRILL ASSIT.
DRILL ASSIT.
DRILL ASSIT.
DRILL ASSIT.
Hazard Plans
(Bye, 2006)
(Bye, 2006)
Open discussion
Underground
EDD versus Pyrotechnics Blast damage from conventional undercutting Blast damage from drawbell blasting Single firing versus phased blasting of drawbells
Open pit
Damage from EDD production blasting Trim versus buffer blasts Pre-splits
Gas or shock effects Angled versus vertical Single bench versus double bench versus triple bench Firing sequence (blasting with trim) Influence of joint orientation
Use of large diameter holes for contour blasting (> 165 mm)