Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chassis*design
*pronounced:chase singular chasez plural
Introduction
Loadsduetonormalrunningconditions:
Vehicletransverseonunevenground. Manoeuverp performedby ydriver.
Fivebasicloadcases:
Bendingcase Torsioncase Combinedbending gandtorsion Lateralloading Foreandaftloading g
Bending
Occupants
Payload Fueltank
Duetoloadingin vertical(XZ)plane. Duetoweightof componentsalong thevehicleframe. Staticconditionvehicle structurecanbetreated as2Dbeam. Unsprung mass
Engine
Wheels/ b ki braking
Suspension
Bendingmoment/Shearforcediagramofatypical passengervehicle hi l
Bending
Dynamicloading:
Inertiaofthestructurecontributesintotalloading Alwayshigherthanstaticloading Roadvehicles:2.5to3timesstaticloads Offroadvehicles:4timesstaticloads
m g
Example: E l
Staticloads
Vehicleatrest. Movingataconstantvelocityonaevenroad. Canbesolvedusingstaticequilibriumbalance. Resultsinsetofalgebraicequations.
Dynamicloads
V Vehicle hi l moving i onabumpy b road devenat tconstant t tvelocity. l it Canbesolvedusingdynamicequilibriumbalance. Generallyresultsindifferentialequations.
m g
m a
Torsion
Whenvehicletraverseonan unevenroad. d Frontandrearaxles experiencesamoment. Puresimpletorsion:
Torqueisappliedtooneaxle andreactedbyotheraxle. Frontaxle:anticlockwise torque(frontview) Rearaxle:balanceswith clockwisetorque Resultsinatorsionmoment aboutx axis.
Rearaxle l
Frontaxle
Torsion
Rearaxle l
Frontaxle
Combinedbendingandtorsion
Bendingandtorsionalloadsaresuper imposed.
Loadingsareassumedtobelinear
Onewheelofthelightlyloadedaxleisraised onabumpresultintheotherwheelgooff ground. Allloadsoflighteraxleisappliedtoone wheel. Duetonatureofresultingloads,loading symmetrywrt xzplaneislost. RR canbedeterminedfrommoment balance balance. RRstabilizesthestructurebyincreasingthe reactionforceonthesidewherethewheelis offground. Themarked
Sideisoffground Sidetakesallloadoffrontaxle Sidesreactionforceincreases Sidesreactionforcedecreases
Bending g
Torsion
tobalancethemoment.
Combinedbendingandtorsion
Lateralloading
Lateralloading
Foramoderncart=1.45mandh =0.51 0 51m. m Criticallateralacceleration=1.42 g ysideforceslimitlateral Inreality accelerationislimitedwithin0.75 g. Kerb bumpingcauseshighloads andresultsinrollover. rollover Widthofcarandreinforcements providessufficientbending stiffnesstowithstandlateral forces. forces Lateralshockloadsassumedto betwicethestaticverticalloads onwheels.
Longitudinalloading
Whenvehicleacceleratesand d l t i decelerates inertia ti f forceswere generated. Acceleration Weight transferredfromfronttoback back.
Reactionforceonfrontwheelis givenby(takingmomentabt RR)
Longitudinalloading
Limiting gtractiveand brakingforcesare decidedbycoefficient offrictionb/wtiresand roadsurfaces Tractive andbraking forcesaddsbending throughsuspension. Inertiaforcesadds additionalbending.
Asymmetricloading
Resultswhenonewheelstrikesa raisedobjectsordropsintoapit. Resolvedasverticalandhorizontalloads. Magnitudeofforcedependson
Speedofvehicle Suspensionstiffness Wheelmass Bodymass
Raised object`
Appliedloadisashockwave
Which h hh hasveryless l timed duration Hencethereisnochangeinvehiclespeed Actsthroughthecenterofthewheel.
Asymmetricloading
Resolvedverticalforcecauses:
Additionalaxleload VerticalinertialoadthroughCG Torsionmoment
Allowablestress
Vehiclestructureisnotfully yrigid g Internalresistanceorstressisinducedtobalance externalforces Stressshouldbekepttoacceptablelimits
StressduetostaticloadXdynamicfactoryieldstress
Shouldnotexceed67%ofyieldstress. stress
Bendingstiffness
Importantinstructuralstiffness Sometimesstiffnessismoreimportantthan strength Determinedbyacceptablelimitsofdeflection ofthesideframedoormechanisms.
Excessivedeflectionwillnotshutdoorproperly
Localstiffnessoffloorisimportant
Stiffenedbyswagespressedintopanels Secondmomentofareashouldbeincreased
Bendingstiffness
Thinpanelsseparatedbyhoneycomb structurereducedvibration Localstiffnesshastobeincreasedat:
Door Bonnet B Suspensionattachpoints Seatingmountingpoints Achievedbyreinforcementplatesandbrackets.
Torsionalstiffness
Allowabletorsionforamediumsizedcar:8000to10000N m/deg / Measuredoverthewheelbase Whentorsionstiffnessislow:
Structuremove upanddown and/orwhip Whenparkedonunevengrounddoorsfailtoclose Doorsfailtoclosewhilejackingifjackpointsareatacorner
Chassistypes Ladderframes
Usedbyearlymotorcars Earlycarsbodyframedidnot contributemuchforvehicle structure.
Mostlymadeofwood whichhaslow stiffness Cross beam
Siderails
Stillusedinlightcommercial vehicleslikepickup.
Chassistypes Ladderframes
Siderailsfrequentlyhaveopen channelsection Openorclosedsectioncrossbeams Goodbendingstrengthandstiffness Flangescontributelargearea momentofinertia. Flangescarryhighstresslevels O Open section i :easyaccessf forfi fixing i bracketsandcomponents Shearcenterisoffsetfromtheweb Localtwistingofsideframeis avoided Loadfromvehicleisappliedonweb
Avoidsholesinhighlystressesflanges
Verylowtorsionalstiffness.
Chassistypes Ladderframes
Clockwisesideframebending
Torsionincrossmemberis reacted dby b bending b d of fside d frames Bendingincrossframesare reacted t dby b t torsion i of fside id frames Allmembersareloadedin torsion Opensectionsarereplaced byclosedsectionsto improvetorsionalstiffness
Strengthofjointsbecomescritical Maxbendingoccursatjoints Attachmentofbracketsbecomes morecomplex l
Anticlockwisecrossframetorsion
Chassistypes cruciformframes
Cancarrytorsionalloads,no elementsoftheframeis subjectedtotorsionalmoment. Madeoftwostraightbeams Haveonlybendingloads Hasgoodtorsionalstiffnesswhen jointincenterissatisfactorily designed Maxbendingmomentoccursin joint. Combiningladderandcruciform frameprovidesgoodbendingand goodtorsionalstiffness Crossbeamsatfrontandbackat suspensionpointsareusedto carrylateralloads
Transverse beam
Chassistypes Spaceframes
Inallframestillnowlengthinone dimensionisverylesscompared tothe h other h twodi dimensions i Increasingdepthincreases bendingstrength Usedinracecars Allplanesarefullytriangulated Beamelementscarry yeither tensionorcompressiveloads. Ringframesdependsonbending ofelements
Windscreen,backlight Enginecompartment,doors Lowershearstiffness
Chassistypes Integralstructures
Moderncarsaremassproduced Sh tsteel Sheet t lpressings i and dspot twelds ld usedtoformanintegralstructure Componentshavestructuraland otherfunctions Sid frames Side f +depth d h+roof fgives i good d bendingandtorsionalstiffness Geometricallyverycomplicated StressdistributionbyFEMonly Stressdistributionisfunctionof appliedloadsandrelativestiffness betweencomponents Advantages:
It is particularly useful in assessing possible load paths. The methodology is based on the idea that the vehicle can be represented (approximately) by sub-assemblies or components that can in turn be represented by plane surfaces. These plane surfaces are held in equilibrium by forces which arise from vehicle loads and which are transmitted to and from adjacent SSS and eventually through to the ground. Adjacent SSS have equal and opposite forces acting on them.
Loadsnormaltoplaneand bendingoutofplaneisinvalid andnotallowed A Simple Structural Surface is rigid in its own plane but flexible out of plane. That is, it can
carry loads in its plane (tension, compression, shear, bending) but loads normal to the plane and bending out of the plane are not possible. Figure 6.20 illustrates diagrammatically the principle of the Simple Structural Surface.
P2w
Rf * tf = 0 2
R'r * tr = 0 2
SS3(Rearcrossbeam)
P3w
ConsiderSSS4(frontpanel)
Q 6 h 2 Q1w = 0
ConsiderSSS5(reardoorframe)
Q 6 h1 Q 3 w = 0
ConsiderSSS8(floorpanel)
Q 6(l1 + l 2 + l 3 + l 4) Q 2 w = 0
ConsiderSSS9(windscreenframe)
Q 6(h1 h 2) Q5 w = 0 sin
ConsiderSSS10(Roof)
Q 6l 5 Q 4 w = 0
SixunknownsQ1 toQ6 SubstituteQ2,Q3 andQ4 intheeqn ofSSS6 Q6 canbe b obtained bt i dand d hencerestofthe unknownscanbederived
Passengercar
Morecomplexthanboxtypevan Detailedmodelvaryaccordingtomechanical components
Frontsuspensionsloadsappliedtofrontwingas forstrutsuspension Rearsuspension(trailingarmortwistbeam)loads toinnerlongitudinalmemberunderthebootfloor SSSsvarieswithbodytypes
VehiclestructuresrepresentedbySSS
Busorboxtypevehicle
Van
P Passenger car
SSS andNotSSS
Structuresthatarestructuralsurfaces
ImagefromJ.C.Brown,2002
ImagefromJ.C.Brown,2002
Halfsaloonmodel
Limitedto5Loads
F1z=(radiator,bumper,battery)/2 F2z 2 =(engine)/2 F3z=onefrontpassengerandseat F4z=onerearpassenger,seat, t and dhalf h lffuel f ltank t k F5z=(luggage)/2
1UDL(body (b weight) h)
Process
Calculate Ca cu atereactions eact o satfront o ta and drear ea a axles es (takingmomentsandverticalforceequilibrium)
Rzf/ /2 Rrz/2
HalfSalooncarmodel Bending
Figure
SSS1
Moments
K1 =Rfz*w1/( /(2*(w ( 1+w2))
Figure
Moments
K1l3 u*((l1+l3)2/2)M=0
Figure
SSS3
Lowerfrontlongitudinal ResolvingForces
F1z +F2z +K5 K2 K4 =0
Figure
SSS4
enginefirewall ResolvingForcesandby symmetry y y
K5 K6 =0
Figure
SSS5
FloorCrossbeam(Front) Resolvingforcesandbysymmetry
K7K4F3z =0
Figure
SSS6
Figure
SSS7
Floorcrossbeam(rear) Resolvingforcesandbysymmetry
K9K11F4z =0
Figure
SSS8
RearPanel Resolvingforcesandby symmetry y y
K10K8 =0
Figure
SSS9
Righthandsideframe Resolvingforces
K6 K7 +K11 +K10 u*(L+l6 l3)=0
MomentsaboutA
K10*(L+l6 l3)+K11*(L l3 l5)K7*(l4 l3)u*(L+l6 l3)2/2=0
Conclusion
SSSs1to9aresubjecttoloads Therearboottopframe,rearscreen,roof, windscreen floorpanelandbootfloorhave windscreen, noloadsappliedtothem The Th side id frame f carries i the h major j loads l d and dis i themainstructuralmember fordetermining the h bending b di stiffness iff and dstrength h of fthe h car.
SSSrepresentationofasalooncarin torsion
Frontaxleisassumedto belighterthanrear. Maximumtorque q that canbeappliedis: Rfz andRrz arereaction loadsatsuspension mountingpoints Rrz canbeobtained.
Rfz R ' rz * tf = * tr 2 2
SSS1(Struttower)
Thecar's ar'sali alignment nmentandstructural str t ral rigiditydependsonthestruttower.
Resolvingforces:
Forcesarenotbalanced.
Momentbalance
Rfz P1+P2 =0 2
Takingmomentaboutthemedial edge
P1 =
Rfz f w2 * 2 (w2 +w 1)
SSS2(Upperfrontlongitudinal)
LoadP1 fromstruttoweristransmitted.
Forcebalance
P3 P1 = 0 Momentbalance
P1 isequaltoP3 createsamomentin clockwisedirection momentM M balances Momenttakenwrt rear edge g
M'Pl 1 3 =0
SSS3(Lowerfrontlongitudinal)
P2 fromstruttoweristransmitted
Forcebalance:
P2 +P4 P5 =0 Momentbalance:
Taken k wrt rearedge d
SSS5(Floorcross beam)
Momentbalance:
SSS6(Longitudinalunderbootfloor)
Forcebalance:
R ' rz P9 + P8 =0 2 Momentbalance:
R ' rz * l 6 P6 9 = SSS 6 willhaveequaland 2 * (l 6 + l 5) oppositeloading P7,P8 andP9 canbefound.
SSS4(Enginefirewall)
Momentbalance:
SSS7(rearfloorcrossbeam)
Momentbalance:
SSS10(rearfloorcrossbeam)
8 tMoment P r Q 1 (balance: h 3 h 2) Q 4 w = 0
Q 1( h h 1) Q 6w = 0 cos
SSS12(Roofpanel)
Momentbalance:
SSS13(Backlightframe)
Momentbalance:
Ql 1 8 Q 7w= 0
SSS15(rearfloorcrossbeam)
Moment balance: Ql 1 7 Qw 9 =0
Q 1( l 5
l 6) Q
10
w = 0
SSS16(Mainfloor)
Momentbalance:
complimentaryshear SSS9(sideframe)
MomentaboutA:
Q4(L+l6 l3) +Q3(Ll5 l3) +P7(l4 l3) +M'+Q6(l9cos) Q7(hh1) 11equationsand11unknowns Qcoc 8 Q.. (L+l6 l7 l3) Q8sin(h3 h1) 1 Q11.Canbesolved. Q9(h3 h1) Q10(h1h2) Q11(h1) =0
Examinationoffigurereveals:
Shearforceisappliedtoallpanels Including gwindscreenframe, ,backlight g frame,trunkframe,rearpanel,floor panelandtrunkfloorpanel Shouldhavegoodshearstiffness Floorpanelrequiresswagingto preventbuckling. Windscreenframeandbacklightframe mustbeconstructedwithstiffcorner joints Thisensuresshearistransferredto roof. Inotherwordstheseframesmustnot shear. Asinglepoorframestiffnesswillresult inpoorvehicletorsional stiffness
Examinationoffigurereveals:
Windscreenframeandbacklightframe arestiffenedbyglass,whichactsas shearpanel Glassesarebondedtoframes Thisensuresglassisretainedinfrontal impacts p Glassissubjectedtoshearstress Ifsurroundingframesarelessstiff glassmaycrack Rearpanelandtrunktopframeare subjectedtoshear. These2componentsarenotvery goodSSSsduetolargediscontinuity causedbytrunklid. Overcomebyhighsillorliftover Thismakespooraccessforloading luggage
Examinationoffigurereveals:
Siderearpanelswhichhousesrear lightsaremadewidelikethesidesof thetrunktopframe. Abetterstructurewillincorporatea panelorcrossbraceintheplaneof rearsearback. back Mostofthemoderncardonothave thisascustomerspreferfoldingseats.
Computationalmethods
Structuralanalysisisnowfundamentalin vehicledesignprocess Finiteelementmethod(FEM)isa promisingtoolinstructuralanalysis Vehiclestructuresaredividedintosmall elements FiniteelementsdeformswhileinSSS structuresareassumedtoberigid Staticand/ordynamicequilibrium equationsalongwithmaterialconstitutive equationsaresolvedusinglinearalgebra ComplexityofFEMincreasedasdetailof vehiclemodelincreases Beamelementsrepresentsills sills,window pillars,enginerailsandfloorcrossbeams Floor,roof,bulkheadscanbemodeledby equivalentbeamsthathavestiffness equivalenttoshearpanels
Computationalmethods
Recentmodelsuseplate and dshell h llelements l to accuratelyrepresentsheet metalcomponents Number N b of floads l d and d numberofelementsresults inaverylargedataset. Longmodelpreparation timeandlongcomputer solvingtime InitialloadingtoFEMcanbe derivedusingrigidbody methodslikeSSS.