You are on page 1of 22

API Stability Protocols and Evaluations

Chris Byrne Tasmanian Alkaloids

API Stability Overview


APIs = 100% pure Limited (if any) degradation
No interactions with other agents in drug products Less likelihood that shipping API to other countries will require special handling

Typically 2 5 year retest dates, so long stability studies Typically not claimed to be sterile so no micro complications Straight forward protocols and reports But, all auditors ask to look at stability programs
They expect to see a well run compliant program Samples pulled and testing done on time SOPs, investigations, training etc

So need to follow good laboratory practices and GMP

API Stability 2012

API GMPs
ICH Q7 : Good Manufacturing Practice Guide for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (2000)
APIs from chemical synthesis, extraction, recovery from natural sources, cell culture/fermentation, or combination of these

Common practice is to use retest dates, not an expiration date (Section 11.6) API Stability (Section 11.5):
First three commercial lots used to establish retest or expiry date, then one batch per year are stability tested Guidance on testing intervals The test procedures used in stability testing should be validated and be stability indicating

API Stability 2012

Guidelines
Core guide (ICH) for EU, USA & Japan
Other countries have similar
So follow ICH but check for any differences if supplying APIs to nonEU/US/Japan
ICH No Q1A(R2) Q1B Q1C Q1D Q1E Q1F Guideline Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Photostability of New Drug Substances and Products Stability Testing for New Dosage Forms Bracketing and Matrixing Designs for Stability Testing of New Drug Substances and Products Evaluation of Stability data Stability Data Package for Registration Applications in Climatic Zones III and IV
API Stability 2012 4

ICH Q1A(R2)
APIs = Drug Substances = Active Substances Note ICH Q1A(R2) is applicable to New drug substances, so should it apply to Existing drug substances? Yes, for example:
EMEA (CPMP/QMP/122/02) :Guideline on Stability Testing: Stability of Existing Active Substances and Related Finished Products This Guideline is similar to ICH Q1A(R2)
API Stability 2012 5

Stability Conditions
Study Long term Intermediate Accelerated General Case Storage Condition Climatic Zones III & IV (ICH Q1F) (ICH Q1A(R2) 25C 2C/60% RH 5% RH or 30C 2C/65% RH 5% RH 30C 2C/65% RH 5% RH 30C 2C/65% RH 5% RH 40C 2C/75% RH 5% RH 40C 2C/75% RH 5% RH

Long term option to use 30 C instead of 25 C introduced in 2003

If use 30 C, then do not have intermediate condition For stable APIs, use 30 C to minimise samples on stability WHO Technical Report No 953, Annex 2 summarises the requirements of individual countries
API Stability 2012 6

Reasons to undertake Stability Testing


New API to establish a retest date
Not that common follow guidelines fully 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months etc., long term & accelerated conditions Retest dates established and extended based upon available data as per Guidelines Annual testing one lot at long term conditions only To confirm the unusual processing does not affect stability and hence retest date Typically use long term conditions, and consider reduced testing frequency (based upon the risk of the process change to impact stability)
API Stability 2012

To maintain retest date on an existing API Non-Typical Lot

Consider the risk that the processing change could have on the long term stability before undertaking additional stability testing

Stability SOP
Typically follows ICH Q1A(R2) Also, the Stability SOP will define:
Max time between manufacture date and placing samples in chamber to initiate programs

Window to pull samples from chambers and window to test after the pull date, e.g.:
Test Date (Months) < 1 month 1 M to < 3M 3M to < 6M > = 6M > 24 M Window to pull samples Exact day + 3 days + 7 days + 14 days
API Stability 2012

E.g. 90 days, otherwise need to retest for time zero results

Window to test 14 days 21 days 28 days


8

Initiate a Stability Program


For the stability protocol, select or define:
Storage condition(s),
Long term only, or accelerated as well?

Testing frequencies,
Typically every 3 months or less for first year (follow guidleines)

Container closure system


Must replicate API storage, e.g. same polyethylene monomer, same outer container, same seals Recommend individual packs, one pack per time point

Specification & Methods


API Stability 2012 9

Select Specifications and Methods


Only test those specifications which are indicative of stability
Do not include identity tests

Typically
Appearance or Description Assay Related Substances or Impurities Solvent or water content
Will consider stability indicating methods later
API Stability 2012 10

Stability Protocol
Need a protocol to initiate stability program records:
Defines conditions, specification, test methods, testing frequency; Manufacturing date and Approval date Time zero results (i.e. lot release data) Packaging

To support a three year retest date, is 36 months stability enough? Remember:


Yes, but often test for one more time point Approved by QA before can start These conditions apply through the program (e.g. if lot release specification or methods change, the historical stability programs do not change)

API Stability 2012

11

Test Results & Reports


Normal QC GMPs apply Evaluate results in real time, but formal stability report not generated till program is complete
Need to interpret results considering inherent analytical variation of the methods Using a line between two data points is dangerous Just summary results table and brief conclusions E.g. Investigate all OOSs

Consider an annual summary report for each API to collate results from all active programs When analysing data:
The data may show so little degradation it is normally unnecessary to go through the formal statistically analysis..
API Stability 2012 12

Stability Indicating Methods

Thus HPLC methods are best Do not assume an USP or EP/BP method is stability indicating you need to determine if it is or not
Especially old methods unlikely to be suitable
API Stability 2012 13

HPLC Stability Method


Need to show that the HPLC method:
API samples exposed to stressed conditions:
Thus no degradants co-elute with main peak

Active substance peak is spectrally pure by Photo Diode Array analysis Degradants are assayed by the method
Thus the method will show when degradation is occurring

The HPLC method then relies upon a drop in assay and an increase in impurities to indicate that the API is degrading over time on stability
Relying upon seeing a trend in lower assay only may not confirm trend until many data points are available due to method variability
API Stability 2012

14

HPLC Method Development


Why analyse stressed samples? ICH Q1A(R2):
Can help identify likely degradation products, which can in turn help establish degradation pathways and the intrinsic stability of the molecule and validate the stability indicating power of the analytical procedures used Note the text asks you to establish a scientific understanding of how your API can degrade
So an analytical and synthetic chemistry study
API Stability 2012 15

Stress Conditions
As per ICH Q1A
The nature of the stress testing will depend on the individual drug substance and the type of drug product involved On solid API
So use scientific common sense when designing experiments Photo degradation as per ICH Q1B, 1.3 Million lux hours Thermal, not more than 100 C Humidity, where appropriate Oxidation, e.g. add hydrogen peroxide and heat if needed Acid & Base hydrolysis, e.g. acidic or basic solutions heated to 70 C for4 hours

In solution

Typically aim for 20% degradation

If API is stable, accept less 20% degradation


API Stability 2012 16

Evaluate Results
Assess active substance PDA peak purity Compare the control to the degradation sample
For solution experiments, before adding acid, base or peroxide Compare to any known impurity standards available

Peak mass balance


Sum of all peak approximately constant between control and degraded sample
Treat results with caution, e.g. UV chromophore of degradant may be different to active substance
API Stability 2012 17

Additional Analysis & Method Report


Recall the aim was to identify likely degradation products, so:
If possible, analyse the stressed samples by HPLCMS to propose potential structures to the main degradants

In the summary report, consider potential degradation pathways

API Stability 2012

18

Stability Chambers
Critical Laboratory Equipment, so full GMP required:
Qualification: temperature and humidity mapping to ensure all parts of the chamber is within spec. Calibrate temperature and humidity probes Log the temperature and humidity conditions Consider power backup Investigate/document any significant outages
API Stability 2012 19

Mean Kinetic Temperature


Definition (ICH Q1A(R2):
A single derived temperature that, if maintained over a defined period of time, affords the same thermal challenge to a drug substance or drug product as would be experienced over a range of both higher and lower temperatures for an equivalent defined period Calculation uses the maximum and minimum average temperatures over a time period

Evaluated to confirm your stability programs are being conducted at the correct conditions Frequency

Outcome

ICH does not specify, USP<1150> for drug products suggests weekly, so you need to define: Consider daily evaluation, review data monthly and perform the calculations Short term spikes in conditions will be compensated for Document the MKTs in a report which then supports the individual stability program reports
API Stability 2012 20

API Intermediates
ICH Q7 is silent on requiring stability testing of intermediates, but this is normally done on a more limited basis Typically undertake testing programs to test initial lots to establish retest date, without further annual testing. Retest date are normally shorter than APIs Intermediates may be damp, not dried, so these are more likely to degrade, thus more critical to undertake these studies
API Stability 2012 21

References/Links
ICH Guidelines
http://www.ich.org/products/guidelines/quality/article/quality-guidelines.html Regulatory/Human Medicines/Scientific Guidelines/Quality/Stability http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/regulation/general/general_content_000361.jsp&mid=WC0b0 1ac0580028eb1

EMEA Guidelines (Europe)

WHO Report 953 Stability Testing of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients and Finished Products, 2009, updated 1 Dec 2010
http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js19133en/ New and Revised Monograph Guidance http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/chapter1.pdf

USP:

API Stability 2012

22

You might also like