Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The message of kaizen strategy is that no day should go without some kind of
improvement being made somewhere in the company.the difference between the
Japanese perception of job function and western perceptions of job functions is that
in Japanese way the innovation, improvement and maintenance is the role of
everyone in the organization including topmanagement middle management
supervisors and workers whereas in western way innovation is the role of only top
management and middle management and top management shows relatively more
im portance in maintenance when compared with that of the Japanese style.and
improvement is hardly found in western style and they feel contended as far as
things goes well as usuall. The need of improvement is not been identified.The
chapter also explains the hierarchy of kaizen involment in an organization by the
top management, middle management supervisors and workers.
The starting point for improvement is to recognize the need . this comes from
recognition of the problem.therefore kaizen emphazises problem awareness and
provides clues for identifying problems.Thus kaizen is also a problem solving
process.Building quality into the process is the crux of Japanese quality control.Total
quality control(TQC) concentrates on the improvement of managerial performance
such as quality assurance, cost reduction, safety, supplier management and most
recently it also includes marketing , sales and service as well.
The difference between the two opposing concepts can be compared to that of
staircase and slope.Innovation strategy is supposed to bring about progress in a
staircase pattern but usually does not.This is because a system established as a
result of new innovation is subject to steady deterioration unless continuous efforts
are made to maintain it and then to improve on it.
Kaizen , on the other hand means a constant effort not only to maintain but also to
upgrade standards.The strength of Japanese management lies in its successful
implementation of a system that acknowledges the ends while emphasizing the
means.Thus kaizen is people oriented whereas innovation is technology and money
oriented.
Kaizen is better suited for the slow growth economy which is been characterized by
high cost of energy and materials, overcapacity and stagnant markets.Another
strenghth of Japanese technology is the close connection between development,
design, and the production line.And the quality of products have always been better
than those from US or European nations because the French designers do not fully
understand the problems encountered on the jobfloor. Hence the management
should be supportive and should have rapport with the workers.Thus kaizen requires
different kind of leadership which is based on personal experience and conviction
and not necessarily on authority, rank or age.It is believed in japan that
improvement brings many truly satisfying experiences in life – identifying problems,
tackling and solving difficult tasks, and thus being elevated to new heights of
achievement.