Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
-kv
mg
m
Jrgen Franck The Recovery of Rockets page 4 of 12
Assuming g and k constant and that
v
mg
k
<
we get by integrating
m
k
dv
mg
k
v
dt
v
v t
2
0
0
m
k
k
mg
v
k
mg
t
v
v
tanh
_
,
1
]
1
1
1
0
m
kg
v
k
mg
v
k
mg
t tanh tanh
_
,
_
,
_
,
1 1
0
The function tanh
1
(x) is the inverse hyperbolic tangent of x. The velocity at any
subsequent instant is then
v
mg
k
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
v
mg
k
+
_
,
_
,
<
tanh tanh ,
1
0 0
Similar we get
v
mg
k
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
v
mg
k
+
_
,
_
,
>
coth coth ,
1
0 0
As t increases the hyperbolic tangent function approaches the limit 1 resulting in the
limiting value for the velocity
v
mg
k
terminal
This is called the terminal velocity, the limit to which the velocity of the parachute
tends. It can also be obtained at once from the equation of motion. At the moment the
air resistance balance gravity the acceleration a of the parachute is zero. Inserting in the
equation of motion the same result for the terminal velocity is obtained.
The distance at any subsequent instant is
v
dy
dt
Jrgen Franck The Recovery of Rockets page 5 of 12
dy
dt
mg
k
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
+
_
,
_
,
tanh tanh
1
0
dy
mg
k
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
dt
y t
0
1
0
0
+
_
,
_
,
tanh tanh
y
mg
k kg
m
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
t
+
_
,
_
,
'
1
]
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
ln cosh tanh
y
m
k
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
v
k
mg
v
mg
k
_
,
_
,
_
,
_
,
'
1
]
1
1
1
1
1
<
ln
cosh tanh
cosh tanh
,
1
0
1
0
0
Similar we get
y
m
k
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
v
k
mg
v
mg
k
_
,
_
,
_
,
_
,
'
1
]
1
1
1
1
1
>
ln
sinh coth
sinh coth
,
1
0
1
0
0
Finally the acceleration at any subsequent instant is
a
dv
dt
a
mg
k
kg
m
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
+
_
,
_
,
'
1
2 1
0
tanh tanh
a g t
kg
m
v
k
mg
v
mg
k
+
_
,
_
,
'
<
1
2 1
0 0
tanh tanh ,
Similar we get
a g t
kg
m
v
k
mg
v
mg
k
+
_
,
_
,
'
>
1
2 1
0 0
coth coth ,
Jrgen Franck The Recovery of Rockets page 6 of 12
3. Motion with air resistance equal to nv
At a relatively low velocity, the air resistance may be approximated by assuming that it
is proportional to the instantaneous velocity, and opposed to it.
Fig. 4 Forces acting on a rocket travelling vertically downward in a parachute
The equation in this case is
ma mg nv
m
dv
dt
mg nv
which may be written
mdv
mg nv
dt
Assuming g and n constant, we get by integrating
-nv
mg
m
Jrgen Franck The Recovery of Rockets page 7 of 12
m
dv
mg nv
dt
v
v t
0
0
( )
1
]
1
m
n
mg nv t
v
v
ln
0
ln
mg nv
mg nv
n
m
t
_
,
0
( ) mg nv mg nv
n
m
t
_
,
0
exp
The velocity at any subsequent instant is then
v
mg
n
v
mg
n
n
m
t +
_
,
_
,
0
exp
The terminal velocity is
v
mg
n
terminal
because as t increases the exponential function approaches the limit 0, as is likewise
evident from the equation of motion.
The distance at any subsequent instant is
v
dy
dt
dy
dt
mg
n
v
mg
n
n
m
t +
_
,
_
,
0
exp
dy
mg
n
v
mg
n
n
m
t dt
y t
0
0
0
+
_
,
_
,
_
,
exp
y
mg
n
t
m
n
v
mg
n
n
m
t
t
_
,
_
,
1
]
1
0
0
exp
y
mg
n
t
m
n
v
mg
n
n
m
t +
_
,
_
,
_
,
0
1 exp
Finally the acceleration at any subsequent instant is
a
dv
dt
Jrgen Franck The Recovery of Rockets page 8 of 12
a
n
m
v
mg
n
n
m
t
_
,
_
,
0
exp
a g
nv
m
n
m
t
_
,
_
,
0
exp
4. Determination of the coefficients k and n
The value k is equal to
k AC
D
where
: Density of the air.
A : Cross sectional area 5 a of the cross-type parachute, where a is the length of
a square.
C
D
: Drag coefficient of the parachute (dimension -less).
The value n is equal to
n K
where
: Coefficient of viscosity of the air.
K : Coefficient related to the shape of the parachute.
The coefficient depends on the frictional force between different layers of the air
moving with different velocities.
The coefficients C
D
and K can be determined theoretical and experimental. The
theoretical approach is complex because many parameters influence on the size of the
coefficients as:
Shape of the parachute.
Porosity of the canopy material.
Length of rigging lines.
Interference from the rocket attached to the parachute.
Interference from the rigging lines.
A practical approach is to derive formulas base on experimental data to obtain the
coefficients.
The most common experimental technique to determine the coefficients is by the use of
a wind tunnel. Practical limitations in the size of the wind tunnel and to avoid
interference from the wind tunnel walls requires typically a scale model of the parachute
to perform the measurements.
Another experimental approach is the vertical drop test from a building or tower where
the actual parachute can be used. To avoid damage on the rocket itself a similar weight
can be used as dummy. The coefficients can be determined by measuring the time taken
by the parachute to fall a specified distance when released from rest. In the two cases
Jrgen Franck The Recovery of Rockets page 9 of 12
we have the following relationship between distance and time when the initial velocity is
zero:
y
m
k
t
kg
m
_
,
'
ln cosh
y
mg
n
t
m g
n
n
m
t
_
,
'
2
2
1 exp
Unfortunately the coefficients k and n can not be determined directly in the above
equations by inserting the measured distance and time. In the latter equation the
exponential function can be written as an infinite series as follows:
( ) exp
! ! ! !
... x x
x x x x
+ + + + + + 1
2 3 4 5
2 3 4 5
For small values of x this series converge very fast and therefore only the first four
terms in the series are inserted in the equation, we get
y
mg
n
t
m g
n
n
m
t
n
m
t
n
m
t +
'
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
1 1
2 6
( )
y gt
ng
m
t
1
2 6
2 3
n
m
t
y
gt
_
,
3
1
2
2
Unfortunately the above equations is more suited for objects with a fixed geometry
during the whole fall. When the parachute is released from rest it takes some time
before it get fully inflated causing inaccurate determination of coefficients. A more
accurate method is to measure over a distance where the parachute travel with the
terminal velocity, we have
y v t
terminal
_
,
2
n mg
t
y
_
,
_
,
2
11 . kg 9.81m/ s
3.6s
14.65m
0.65kg / m
2
2
The drag coefficient of the parachute is
C
k
A
D
2 2 0 65
1225 125
085
.
. .
.
kg / m
kg / m m
3 2
where is the density of the air and A is the cross sectional area of the cross parachute.
The terminal velocity of the rocket is
v
mg
k
terminal
9 5 981
0 65
12
. .
.
kg m/ s
kg / m
m/ s
2
Use a scaled parachute based on the one from the experiment to adjust the terminal
velocity. This is possible because a scaled parachute do not influence on the size of the
experimental found drag coefficient avoiding further experiments. A parachute twice the
size used in the experiment reduce the terminal velocity by
Jrgen Franck The Recovery of Rockets page 11 of 12
1
2
0 7 .
We assume that the parachute move with the terminal velocity throughout the distance
of interest, which is
v
mg
k
terminal
11 981
0 65
4
. .
.
kg m/ s
kg / m
.07m/ s
2
To check this assumption we will find the velocity of the parachute when it enters the
distance of interest. We first determine the time is takes to travel 3m
t
m
kg
yk
m
_
,
'
cosh exp
1
t
_
,
'
11
065 981
3 065
11
1
.
. .
cosh exp
.
.
kg
kg / m m/ s
m kg / m
kg
2
t 102 . s
Remember the initial velocity is zero because we drop it and further we neglect the time
it takes the parachute to fully deploy. Finally the velocity can be obtained after travelling
3m, we get
v
mg
k
t
kg
m
_
,
tanh
v
_
,
11 9 81
0 65
1
0 65 9 81
11
. .
.
tanh
. .
.
kg m/ s
kg / m
.02s
kg / m m/ s
kg
2 2
v 4 01 . m/ s
Apparently the parachute have reached a velocity very close to the terminal velocity, so
3m is adequate to ensure this. Anyway we always force the parachute to be fully
deployed before we release it, to create a scenario as close to the assumptions above.
Last we will determine the touchdown velocity of the payload. Due to different lengths
of the lines respectively to the engine and payload, the payload section is 4m above
ground at engine touchdown. This time the initial velocity is greater than the terminal
velocity and the mass m is equal to
m m m
rocket engine
m 95 69 . . kg kg = 2.6kg
As before we calculate first the time it takes to travel the distance, in this case 4m, we
get
Jrgen Franck The Recovery of Rockets page 12 of 12
t
m
kg
v
k
mg
yk
m
v
k
mg
_
,
_
,
_
,
'
_
,
1
]
1
1
sinh sinh coth exp coth
1 1
0
1
0
t 0 45 . s
Finally the velocity can be obtained after travelling 4m, we get
v
mg
k
t
kg
m
v
k
mg
+
_
,
_
,
coth coth
1
0
v 7 3 . m/ s
This simple arrangement reduce the touchdown velocity for the payload section from
12m/s to 7.3m/s. The terminal velocity of the payload is
v
mg
k
terminal
2 6 9 81
0 65
6 3
. .
.
.
kg m/ s
kg / m
m/ s
2
Finally I will not recommend to use the theory based on air resistance proportional to
the instantaneous velocity in the above experiment. Especially the use of a reduced mass
in the experiment to prolong the drop time result in a very inaccurate determination of
the rockets terminal velocity. Inserting the values result in a terminal velocity of the
rocket equal to
v
m y
m t
terminal
rocket
exp
v
terminal
95 14 65
11 36
395
. .
. .
.
kg m
kg s
m/ s
6. References
1. Theoretical Mechanics, Murray R. Spiegel. Schaums Outline Series In Science.
McGraw-Hill Book Company.
2. Fundamental University Physics, Volume I, Mechanics, Marcelo Alonso and Edward
J. Finn. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
3. An Introduction To The Infinitesimal Calculus, G. W. Caunt. Oxford University
Press.
4. Mathematical Handbook, Murray R. Spiegel. Schaums Outline Series In
Mathematics. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
5. Mathematische Formelsammlung, Hochschultaschenbcher, Band 13, Karl
Rottmann. Bibliographisches Institut AG, Mannheim.