Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ECE4130
Submitted by
Muhammad Ashiqul Islam Roll: 0909018 Dept: Electronics and communication engineering Khulna University Of Engineering And Technology
10/30/2013
Abstract:
This report contains a general overview on paper OFDM for Next Generation Optical Access Networks written by Neva Cvijetic, Member, IEEE. It will focus on the principles, advantages, challenges, and practical requirements of optical orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)-based optical access with an emphasis on orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA) for application in next-generation passive optical networks (PON). It also contain various optical OFDM(A) transceiver architectures for next-generation PON and functional requirements are outlined for high-speed digital signal processors (DSP) and data converters in OFDMA-PON. These all topics were discussed by the author Neva Cvijetic and here it is written from my perspective of understanding the paper.
Fig. 1. OFDM(A) spectrum with four orthogonal subcarriers. The reason why OFDM boasts a spectral efficiency advantage over conventional FDM is precisely that it eliminates the spectral guard bands f by invoking the principle of orthogonality.(Since multilevel modulation, such as M -ary QAM, can be used in SC, FDM, and OFDM, it is not in itself the reason behind OFDM spectral efficiency.) Orthogonality, in turn, can be achieved by judicious selection of the subcarrier frequencies, fn , n=0,1,2,N-1. For example, let us assume that f1 is a sinusoidal carrier that has been modulated with a complex QAM symbol,A1-jB1 , where the exact values of A1 and B1 will depend on the selected QAM constellation. For 16-QAM, for example, A1 {1,3} and B1 {1j,3j}. As such, s1(t) can be expressed as .(1) Where in the first and second terms, respectively, denote the in-phase and quadrature portions of the signal, produced by the complex nature of M -ary QAM signaling. To now ensure orthogonality between s1(t) and s1(t) , where is the QAM-modulated signal on subcarrier f2, it must be the case that
.(2) An elegant way to meet this requirement of orthogonality is to define the subcarrier frequencies as integer multiples (i.e., harmonics) over the symbol time as (3)
Fig.2: Block diagram of a generic OFDM communication system. Combining (1) and (3), the complete electrical OFDM signal may be expressed as
(4) where g(t) denotes the impulse response of any baseband pulse shaping filter that might be used; the simplest choice is the rectangular pulse given by g(t)=1,0tT , and zero elsewhere, which produces the aggregate spectrum of Fig. 2. However, from (4), a practical OFDM implementation difficulty becomes apparent: for an OFDM signal with 256 subcarriers, for example, directly implementing (4) would require an array of 255 synchronized analog oscillators at both the transmitter and receiver sides. Fortunately, most of (4) can in fact be done digitally. To observe this, we rewrite (4) as
From (5) and (6), we note that if (6) can be generated efficiently, producing (5) becomes a simple task, requiring just one oscillator operating at fRF . Converting (6) to the digital domain by sampling (6) at times t=kT/N , where the discrete time index is defined by k=1,2,3,.. , we obtain
We now observe that, by definition, at each discrete time, ,(7) is in fact the inverse discrete Fourier transform of the complex QAM symbols, , over the OFDM subcarriers, which can be implemented using the highly efficient inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) algorithm. The IFFT and the FFT, therefore, become the baseband OFDM modulator and demodulator, respectively. In other words, (7) states that if we pick any frequency-domain complex QAM data symbols and take their -point IFFT, we will get the sampled time-domain version of the corresponding -subcarrier OFDM signal. Digital to-analog conversion and up conversion to using a single analog oscillator then complete the RF OFDM signal generation in (5).
Fig.3: OFDM symbol transmission in (a) ideal, non-dispersive channel, (b) dispersive channel without CP insertion, resulting in ISI, and (c) dispersive channel with CP insertion used to eliminate ISI.
Fig.4:
OFDMA-PON Technology:
Several candidates for future passive optical network (PON) l OFDMA, TDM, WDM, hybrid TDM/WDM OFDMA-PON differentiator: tackle key challenges in electronic domain through digital signal processing (DSP) Leverage advanced DSP to achieve superior performance, rapid and robust network re-configurability, cost reduction OFDMA-PON: novel DSP-based platform for speed, flexibility and cost-efficiency in future high-speed PON access systems Critical that future PON technologies be highly cost-efficient to remain attractive and practical i)Re-use existing optical distribution network (ODN) ii)Upgrade with advanced modulation and digital signal processing (DSP)
Fig.5 depicts a single-wavelength OFDMA-PON architecture that exploits the principles described earlier; a WDM extension can readily be made by launching multiple wavelengths from the OLT and adopting the single-wavelength architecture of previous pages fig on each of the launched wavelengths. As shown in Fig. 8, at the OLT, a bandwidth-sharing schedule is formed according to ONU-side demand, and is distributed to all ONUs over pre-reserved subcarriers and/or timeslots. Different OFDM subcarriers can thus be assigned to different ONUs; each OFDM subcarrier can also be time shared to realize 2-D multiuser bandwidth partitioning. One and 2-D bandwidth provisioning can also be combined. For example, while ONU-2 in Fig. 8 maintains a fixed subcarrier assignment over several frames, ONU-1 and ONU-3 engage in time-domain sharing of the same OFDM subcarriers. Since traffic is aggregated and de-aggregated electronically, the architecture also features the important advantage of a passive lastmile optical splitter, such that the legacy fiber distribution network, which accounts for the majority of PON investment cost, can be reused. At the ONUs, each ONU recovers its pre assigned OFDM subcarriers and/or time slots in DSP. An orthogonal OFDMA-based schedule for upstream transmission is likewise generated by the OLT and distributed to the ONUs. At the OLT, a complete OFDMA frame is assembled from the incoming sub frames originating at different ONUs. Consequently, for both downstream and upstream OFDMA-PON accurate synchronization is very important to enable multiuser access. The OFDMA-PON platform of Fig. 8 can support heterogeneous services because OFDM subcarriers essentially become transparent pipes for the delivery of arbitrary signals (e.g., legacy T1/E1 lines, Ethernet packets, both analog and digitized mobile backhaul, IPTV, VPN, etc.) In terms of implementation, the integrated DSP-based transmission and control planes mean that the MAC protocols can be regarded as simply another functional block of the digital OFDM(A) transceivers. This software-defined approach features high re-configurability, such that the system can be extended to new and emerging applications in a non-disruptive fashion. Consequently, OFDMA-PON (see Fig. 8) can cost-efficiently coexist with legacy systems and devices on the same fiber ODN by operating in an orthogonal wavelength or frequency band. For example, 15101540 nm downstream and 13401360 nm upstream OFDMA-PON operation can enable coexistence with G-PON, XG/10 G-EPON, and legacy RF video overlays. For backward compatible networks, optimal spectral mapping and the required degree of OLT and ONU-side change thus emerge as important challenges. In green-field deployments, which would not involve backward compatibility considerations, a wavelength plan that maximizes mature optical component reuse would be preferred. Because of a directional asymmetry in the PON topology i.e., a point-to-multipoint downstream and multipoint-to-point in the upstreamdifferent issues exist for downstream versus upstream transmission in OFDMA-PON. These are surveyed next, along with some potential techniques for mitigating these challenges.
i)Key goal: real-time, high-speed (multi Gb/s) operation ii)Key DSP-based components: Digital to Analog Converter (DAC), Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) DSP processor iii)Digital processor implemented either through Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) or Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC)