You are on page 1of 3

Self Assessment Quality Assurance Questionnaire

Please review the following questionnaire to assess the current level of quality assurance system prevailing in our organization. Because of WIT is in emergence phase, so I know we'll not be able to answer them, but to establish the QA we've to incorporate these elements in our system. Level Scale: Level 1 No formal approach Guidance - No systemic approach is evident. There are poor results or unpredictable results. Data are available, but not used for improvement of performance. Level 2 Reactive approach Guidance Problem-based approach. The educational organization responds to complaints or mandates as needed. Data are reviewed as required. Limited additional educational organization data on results is available. Level 3 Stable approach Guidance - Data and detailed, timely local data are used to guide conformance to requirements. There is an established method or an approach. There is concern for improvement. Level 4 Systematic approach Guidance - Systemic process alignment with good results and sustained improvement trends. The data are effectively used and learner performance continuously improved. State standards are consistently met. Level 5 Substantial continuous improvement Guidance - Strongly integrated system management with institutionalized improvements. Learners are proficient according to educational organization criteria. NB: The level we'll assign to each question is just for sake of planning purpose. This will help us to establish a baseline for identifying processes needed for imparting quality education.

Criteria 01- Quality Management System


Sr. No 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Question
Process used to determine, review, and improve learners proficiency Activities enabling each learner to achieve proficient performance Assessments verifying each learners knowledge and skill required Alignment of standards, curriculum, instruction, testing, and improvement Measures of each learners motivation for meeting requirements Learning support proven to be effective for each learner Systematic monitoring of all processes related to each learners proficiency Effectiveness of classroom facilities and resources Validation of curriculum to meet both career and education requirements

Proposed Level

Criteria 02- Quality Policy in the WIT


Sr. No 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Question
Selection and use of information to support management system Timely data that are effective in improving learning and teaching processes Criteria and methods for comparing data to improve processes Analyzing data from outside your educational organization Integration of information from all parts of your educational organization Translating your review findings into quality system effectiveness Records of effective changes made to your quality system Evidence of system changes have improved results

Proposed Level

Criteria 03-Education Resource Management


Sr. No 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Question
Effective administration of learner learning processes Critical curriculum design requirements for each learner Support services to enable learners to meet educational requirements Processes monitored on a day-to-day basis Assessing processes and implement changes Processes that improve learner proficiency Reduced wasteful activities

Proposed Level

Criteria 04-Realization of the educational services


Sr. No 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Question
Evidence of substantial and continuous performance improvement Successful projects to improve existing or new processes Small-step improvements that have been made within existing processes Effective breakthrough improvements that have been made to your system Ongoing process improvements aligned with learning requirements Curriculum aligned with learning improvements Resources and planning aligned with learner improvement

Proposed Level

Sr. No 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08

Question

Proposed Level

You might also like