Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
1.1 Introduction to ratio analysis:
Financial information is always prepared to satisfy in some way the needs of various interested parties (the "users of accounts"). Stakeholders in the business (whether they are internal or external to the business) seek information to find out three fundamental questions: (1) How is the business trading? (2) How strong is the financial position? (3) What are the future prospects for the business? For outsiders, published financial accounts are an important source of information to enable them to answer the above questions. To some degree or other, all interested parties will want to ask questions about financial information which is likely to fall into one or other of the following categories, and be about:
Key Issues Is the business making a profit? How efficient is the business at turning revenues into profit? Is it enough to finance reinvestment? Is it growing? Is it sustainable (high quality)? How does it compare with the rest of the industry? Is the business making best use of its resources? Is it generating adequate returns from its investments? Is it managing its working capital properly? Is the business able to meet its short-term debts as they fall due? Is the business generating enough cash? Does the business need to raise further finance? How risky is the finance structure of the business? What returns are owners gaining from their investment in the business? How does this compare with similar, alternative investments in other businesses?
Financial efficiency
Shareholder return
When we prepare the report we face some problem to accomplish this report. Unavailability of the most recent data and service Information. Lake of enough Information. Lack of secret Information. We are not expert on report writing so it should have some wrong. The data collection process is time consuming.
These companies financial report are the main source of collecting primary information. Secondary Source:
2. Literature Review
2.1 Definition of 'Ratio Analysis':
A tool used by individuals to conduct a quantitative analysis of information in a company's financial statements. Ratios are calculated from current year numbers and are then compared to previous years, other companies, the industry, or even the economy to judge the performance of the company. Ratio analysis is predominately used by proponents of fundamental analysis. A financial ratio (or accounting ratio) is a relative magnitude of two selected numerical values taken from an enterprise's financial statements. Often used in accounting, there are many standard ratios used to try to evaluate the overall financial condition of a corporation or other organization. Financial ratios may be used by managers within a firm, by current and potential shareholders (owners) of a firm, and by a firm's creditors. Security analysts use financial ratios to compare the strengths and weaknesses in various companies. If shares in a company are traded in a financial market, the market price of the shares is used in certain financial ratios. Ratios can be expressed as a decimal value, such as 0.10, or given as an equivalent percent value, such as 10%. Some ratios are usually quoted as percentages, especially ratios that are usually or always less than 1, such as earnings yield, while others are usually quoted as decimal numbers, especially ratios that are usually more than 1, such as P/E ratio; these latter are also called multiples. Given any ratio, one can take its reciprocal; if the ratio was above 1, the reciprocal will be below 1, and conversely. The reciprocal expresses the same information, but may be more understandable: for instance, the earnings yield can be compared with bond yields, while the P/E ratio cannot be: for example, a P/E ratio of 20 corresponds to an earnings yield of 5%.
comprise the firm's "accounting statements" or financial statements. The statements' data is based on the accounting method and accounting standards used by the organization.
between companies between industries between different time periods for one company between a single company and its industry average
Ratios generally hold no meaning unless they are benchmarked against something else, like past performance or another company. Thus, the ratios of firms in different industries, which face different risks, capital requirements, and competition, are usually hard to compare.
There is no international standard for calculating the summary data presented in all financial statements, and the terminology is not always consistent between companies, industries, countries and time periods.
COGS = Cost of goods sold, or cost of sales. EBIT = Earnings before interest and taxes EBITDA = Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization EPS = Earnings per share
2.7 Ratios:
2.7.1 Profitability ratios:
Profitability ratios measure the company's use of its assets and control of its expenses to generate an acceptable rate of return Gross profit margin or Gross Profit Rate
OR
Note: Operating income is the difference between operating revenues and operating expenses, but it is also sometimes used as a synonym for EBIT and operating profit. This is true if the firm has no non-operating income. (Earnings before interest and taxes / Sales) Profit margin, net margin or net profit margin
OR
Note: this is somewhat similar to (ROI), which calculates Net Income per Owner's Equity Cash flow return on investment (CFROI)
Efficiency ratio
Net gearing
Cash ratio
DSO Ratio
Asset turnover
Cash Conversion Cycle Inventory Conversion Period + Receivables Conversion Period - Payables Conversion Period
OR
10
Payout ratio
OR
P/E ratio
Dividend yield
Price/sales ratio
PEG ratio
EV/Sales
11
3. Organization Profile
12
13
14
In December 1971, after nine months of liberation war, Bangladesh emerged in the world map as a new independent state with the same geographical boundary of the then East Pakistan. Plunged into a state of total economic collapse following the war of liberation, vigorous activities were immediately started at all levels to rebuild the country. Certain national priorities were set by the then Govt. and significant changes were brought about in the management of development activities. A no. of Sector or Corporations were formed and each of them was entrusted with the operation and management of the units under it. In March 26, 1972 Govt. has formed Bangladesh Oil, Gas & Mineral Corporation (BOGMC) under the Presidential Executive Order and Titas Gas T&D Co. Ltd. has become an enterprise of BOGMC. Titas Gas T&D Co. Ltd. which was earlier established as a joint stock company with 90% share capital of the Govt. of Pakistan naturally vested to the Govt. of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh and the rest 10% share capital of Pakistan Shell Oil Company was transferred to the newly formed Bangladesh Shell Oil Company. During 1975, under the nationalization program, Govt. has brought back 10% share of Shell Oil Co. and Titas Gas T&D Co. Ltd. has become a 100% Government owned Company. Meanwhile, during August1974, Bangladesh Oil & Gas Corporation/Petrobangla and during October 1975, Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources had been formed. TGTDCL has been placed under the administrative control of the newly formed ministry along with Petrobangla and its subsidiary Companys. The gas supply area of the Company has been extended to new areas of Greater Dhaka, Greater Mymensingh and Brahmanbaria which includes Dhaka Metropolitan city & suburbs, Tongi, Joydevpur, Gazipur, Mirzapur, Tangail, Savar, Dhamrai, Manikaganj, Aricha, Narayanganj, Sonargaon, Rupganj, Araihazar, Jinjira, Keraniganj, Munshiganj, Mirkadim, Brahmanbaria, Bhairab Bazar, Ashuganj, Narsingdi, Ghorashal, Madhabdi, Sreepur, Mymensingh, Netrokona, Jamalpur, Sherpur, Kishoreganj, Tarakandi, Bhaluka, Trishal & Gaffergaon. Presently, Titas system is receiving gas from Titas, Habiganj, Narsingdi & Bakhrabad Gas Fields under Bangladesh Gas Fields Co. Ltd. and from Rashidpur, Kailashtila, Beanibazar Gas Fields under Sylhet Gas Fields Co. Ltd. and Jalalabad Gas Field of Oxydental/Unicol. The Company own and operate 735 Km of Transmission pipelines (6DN thru 24 DN) and 7585 Km of Distribution & Service lines (3/4DN thru 12DN).
16
Presently, in Titas System the Daily average offtake of gas is 800 Million Cubic Feet (MMCF) and the yearly Revenue Earnings is Tk. 24000 million. The Company has so far given gas connection to around 9,73,419 customers (17 Power stations, 4 Fertilizer factories, 2953 Industrial units, 7832 Commercial units, 152 Seasonal units, 55 CNG and 968016 Domestic customers). TGTDCL alone is saving a sum of over Tk.22000.00 Million annually on fuel import bill of the country other than its payment to National Exchequer in the form of Excise Duty, CD/VAT, Corporate Tax and Dividend. At Present, there are 2642 Employees (660 Officers and 1982 Staffs) serving in the Company, among which 205 are foreign trained Graduate Engineers, Economists and Accountants. Among the four gas marketing Companies the market share of business of TGTDCL is 70 % of which Power, Fertilizer, Industrial, Commercial, Domestic and Seasonal are 48.20 %, 18.97 %, 20.28 %, 1.04 %, 11.56 % and 0.13 % respectively. The company operates from its own office complex at Titas Bhaban, Kawranbazar C/A, that is in the centrally located business area of Dhaka Metropolitan City. The office is fully furnished with all modern office facilities and logistics. The office is also equipped with security system with modern digital telephone, Fax, SCADA as well as electronic mail. With the increased shape the authorized and paid-up capital of the Company has increased to Tk. 2000 million and 1507.30 million. Titas Gas is now a household name for its uses in the houses, Power plants, Industries, hotels and restaurants. And as raw materials to the Fertilizer factories, it is helping attain autarky in food and other agricultural products. TGTDCL has, by its own right and merit, earned the reputation as well the capacity to undertake any major project in Gas Engineering, Pipeline Construction, Operation and Maintenance thereof and also in the marketing of gas in the country.
17
Pakistan National Oil Limited by virtue of Bangladesh Abandoned Property (control, Management & Disposal) Order, 1972 (P. O. No. 16 of 1972) and the Company was renamed as Bangladesh National Oil Limited. The Company has been finally renamed as Jamuna Oil Company Limited (JOCL) by the Government on 13 January, 1973. At that time the company was operated by an adhoc committee called Oil Companies Advisory Committee (OCAC) under Petrobangla, constitute by the notification No. 21 m-4/76 (NR) dated 21-4-73, M/O. Natural Resources. Jamuna Oil Company Limited was registered with the registrar of Joint Stock Companies & Firms as fully Government owned Private Limited Company on 12 March, 1975 under Companies Act 1913 with authorized capital of Tk. 10.00 crore and paidup capital of Tk. 5.00 crore. Subsequently, in the year 1976 the assets and liabilities of the Company were transferred & handed over to Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) as per schedule stated in clause 31(c) of BPC Ordinance No. LXXXVIII (published in Bangladesh Gazette extra ordinary on 13 November, 1976). Since then Jamuna Oil Company Limited has been functioning as a Subsidiary of BPC. On 1 January, 1986 all assets and liabilities of Indo-Burmah Petroleum Company Limited (IBPCL) were transferred to the Company.
In 2005-2006 FY the paid-up capital of the company was increased to Tk. 10.00 crore from Tk. 5.00 crore by issuing of bonus share out of its profit. The company was converted into a Public Limited Company from a Private Limited Company on 25 June, 2007 and its authorized capital was increased to Tk. 300.00 crore. On 10 August, 2007 the paid-up capital of the company was increased to Tk.45.00 crore by issuing bonus share of Tk. 35.00 crore. The company was enlisted with Dhaka Stock Exchange Limited and Chittagong Stock Exchange Limited on 9 January, 2008 with a view to off-load 1.35 crore shares of Tk.10.00 each under direct listing procedure and accordingly the shares of the company were offloaded in the capital market.There is a Board of Directors constituting of 9 members to run the Company. The overall activities of the company are performed with the approval of the Board of Directors. The company implements the Government policies as per the guidance and directives of BPC from time to time.
19
2006 0.22:1
2007 0.23:1
2008 0.64:1
2009 0.73:1
2010 0.52:1
They are having fewer quick assets against each tk. current liabilities. But their quick ratio is growing. In 2010 again falls their quick ratio.
20
2007 59 Days
2008 42 Days
2009 46 Days
2010 53 Days
They have needed averagely 49.008 day to convert accounts receivable into cash.
They have almost same times of total assets to convert sales. But averagely they have 0.25 times total assets to convert into sale.
2006 59.01 %
2007 68.09 %
2008 45.36 %
2009 56.87 %
2010 42.47 %
Interpretation
21
They have downward time to payoff the interest. But in 2010 time to payoff the interest is increased.
2006 53.01 %
2007 51.06 %
2008 54.42 %
2009 52.9 %
2010 54.97 %
2006 33.01 %
2007 39.22 %
2008 44.45 %
2009 44 %
2010 47.76 %
2006 27 %
2007 23.08 %
2008 26.48 %
2009 24.52 %
2010 31.87 %
Interpretation
Their net profit margin almost same. But in 2010 increased net profit margin.
22
Formula Earnings available for common stockholders Number of shares of common stock outstanding
Interpretation
Their earning per share is increasing every year. But in 2008 earnings per share is fall down.
2006 5.7%
2007 6%
2008 6.9%
2009 6.9%
2010 7.78%
Their earning against assets has been increase gradually from 2006 to 2010.
2006 15.17 %
2007 18.82 %
2008 12.56 %
2009 16.06 %
2010 13.85 %
Their return on equity increased in2006, 2007 and 2009. Except in 2008 and 2010 thats because common stock equity was increased.
23
Formula Market price per share of common stock Earnings per share
Investors want to invest averagely 32.70 tk. for 1 tk. of earning. In 2008 and 2009 it was constrain but in 2007 it was very high and 2010 it was very low.
Formula Market price per share of common stock Book value per share of common stock
2010 5 Tk.
From 2006 to 2007 market to book value ratio increased, but in 2008 it decrease but again it increased in 2006. But again it falls in 2010.
24
They are inventory conversion time is downward into liquidity. But in 2010 it increase.
25
They have almost same times total assets to use to convert sales. And total asset turnover times are upward.
2006 76.5%
2007 74.49 %
2008 62.65 %
2009 61.10 %
2010 58.01 %
They have been financing averagely 66.55% of assets by the debt. And debt ratio trained is downward.
They have upward time to payoff the interest. But in 2010 time to payoff the interest is very high.
26
2006 13.73 %
2007 14.85 %
2008 16.72 %
2009 16.69 %
2010 17.74 %
The gross profit margin is averagely 15.95%. But in 2008 & 2009 it was constrain and it is also upward trained.
2006 8.57 %
2007 9.68 %
2008 11.92 %
2009 12.04 %
2010 14.02 %
2006 16.07 %
2007 20.57 %
2008 9.43 %
2009 10.01 %
2010 11.02 %
Interpretation
From 2006 to 2007 it was upward. But in 2008 it falls and again it increase.
Formula Earnings available for common stockholders Number of shares of common stock outstanding
Interpretation
Their earning per share is very high from 2006 to 2007. Because the company was listed in 2008. Then their earnings per share gradually increased.
27
2006 16.29 %
2007 19.41 %
2008 11.51 %
2009 13.01 %
2010 15.03 %
Their earning has been increase gradually from 2006 to 2010. But it falls in 2008 and again it gradually increased.
2006 59.96 %
2007 67%
2008 30.80 %
2009 32.78 %
2010 34.92 %
Their return on equity was high in2006 & 2007. But from 2008 to 2010 it gradually increased.
Formula Market price per share of common stock Earnings per share
2006 0Tk.
2007 0Tk.
The company listed in 2008 for that reason we cannot find 2006 & 2007 P/E ratio. But after listing the P/E ratio gradually increased.
Formula Market price per share of common stock Book value per share of common stock
2006 0Tk.
2007 0Tk.
Interpretation
The company listed in 2008 for that reason we cannot find 2006 & 2007 M/B ratio. But after listing the M/B ratio gradually increased.
28
They are inventory conversion time is downward into liquidity. But in 2010 it increase.
They are average collection period is downward. But in 2010 it again increases.
29
They have almost same times total assets to use to convert sales. But averagely they have 0.066 times total assets to convert into sale.
2006 88.63 %
2007 89.27 %
2008 86.68 %
2009 84.27 %
2010 85.20 %
Interpretation
They have been financing averagely 86.81% of assets by the debt. The debt ratio almost same.
They have upward time to payoff the interest. But in 2009 time to payoff the interest is decreased.
2006 90.37 %
2007 94.20 %
2008 94.53 %
2009 91.99 %
2010 91.11 %
30
2006 25.53 %
2007 45.96 %
2008 65.68 %
2009 34.22 %
2010 46.25 %
From 2006 to 2008 operating profit margin gradually increased. But in 2009 it falls and again in 2010 it increases.
2006 30.22 %
2007 46.01 %
2008 68.28 %
2009 93.98 %
2010 101.7 %
Interpretation
Formula Earnings available for common stockholders Number of shares of common stock outstanding
Interpretation
Their earning per share is high from 2006 to 2007. Because the company was listed in 2007. Then their earnings per share gradually increased.
2006 2.29 %
2007 3.13 %
2008 5.46 %
2009 4.90%
2010 5.04 %
Their earning has been increase gradually from 2006 to 2010. But it falls in 2009 and again it gradually increased.
31
2006 20.14 %
2007 29.18 %
2008 43.28 %
2009 32.94 %
2010 35.39 %
Their return on equity was gradually increased in2006 to 2008 and 2010, except 2009.
Formula Market price per share of common stock Earnings per share
2006 0Tk.
2007 0Tk.
The company listed in 2007 for that reason we cannot find 2006 & 2007 P/E ratio. After listing the P/E ratio gradually increased. But in 2010 it falls.
Formula Market price per share of common stock Book value per share of common stock
2006 0Tk.
2007 0Tk.
The company listed in 2007 for that reason we cannot find 2006 & 2007 M/B ratio. After listing the M/B ratio increased. But in 2010 it falls.
32
Compare to industry average with Summit power has less current asset against current liability. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd. & Jamuna Oil Ltd. has good current asset against current liability.
1.5 1 0.5 0 Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited 0.98 1.19 0.6 1.14
Quick Ratio
0.74:1
0.52:1
0.61:1
Comparison
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Jamuna Oil Ltd has less quick asset against quick liability. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd. has good current asset against current liability.
1 0.74 0 Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited
33
1.1 0.52
0.61
12.15 Times
5.79 Times
0.01 Times
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Jamuna Oil Ltd is not good or efficient in inventory management. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd. are good or more efficient.
40 20 0 12.15 Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited 5.79
30.66 0.01
Average collection Period Comparison 122.90 days Compare to industry average with Summit power & Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd. is not good average collection period. But Jamuna Oil Ltd has good average collection period. 53 days 78.68 days 237 days
300 200 100 122.9 0 Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited 53 78.68 237
34
0.52 Times
0.24 Times
0.051 Times
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Jamuna Oil Ltd is not good asset turnover. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd. is good asset turnover.
1.5 1 0.5 0.52 0 Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited 0.24 1.27
0.051
61.90%
42.47%
85.20%
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd. is efficient. But Jamuna Oil Ltd is inefficient.
100.00%
50.00% 61.90% 0.00% Industry Average Summit Power Limited 42.47% 58.01%
85.20%
Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited
35
42.12 Times
3.005 Times
10.6 Times
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Jamuna Oil Ltd is inefficient. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd are efficient.
150 100 50 42.12 0 Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited 3.005 112.74 10.6
54.61%
54.97%
91.11%
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Jamuna Oil Ltd is good. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd are not good.
100.00% 50.00% 54.61% 0.00% Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited
36
36.01%
47.76%
46.25%
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Jamuna Oil Ltd is good. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd are not good.
60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited 36.01% 47.76% 14.02% 46.25%
48.20%
31.87%
101.7%
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd is not good. But Jamuna Oil Ltd is good.
150.00% 100.00% 50.00% 48.20% 0.00% Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited
37
12.63 Tk.
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Jamuna Oil Ltd is not good. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd are good.
85.62 12.63
Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited
Return on Total Asset (ROA) Interpretation Compare to industry average with Summit power & Jamuna Oil Ltd is not good to overall profitable asset. But Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd are good. 9.28% 7.78% 15.03% 5.04%
20.00% 15.00% 10.00% 5.00% 0.00% Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited 15.03% 9.28% 7.78% 5.04%
38
Return on Common Equity (ROE) Interpretation Compare to industry average with Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd & Jamuna Oil Ltd is good to profitable investment. But Summit power is not good. 28.05% 13.85% 34.92% 35.93%
40.00%
34.92%
35.39%
Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited
13.95 Tk.
3.62 Tk.
11.66 Tk.
26.56 Tk.
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd isnot good. But Jamuna Oil Ltd is good.
39
5.7 Tk.
5 Tk.
8.03 Tk.
Compare to industry average with Summit power & Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd is not good. But Jamuna Oil Ltd is good.
10 8 6 4 2 0 Industry Average Summit Power Limited Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited Jamuna Oil Limited 5.7 5 4.07 8.03
40
41
Summit power ltd. does not give any information about dividend policy. But by the calculation we find out, That Summit Power Limited is following Constant- Payout- Ratio dividend policy. But in 2007 they retain the most of the net income.
42
4.3.4 Dividend policy of Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co. Ltd.
Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited do not give any information about dividend policy. But by the calculation we find out, That Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Company Limited are following Constant-Payout-Ratio dividend policy. They did not give any dividend in 2006. In 2007 and 2008 is almost same percentage of dividend payout ratio. In 2009 and 2010 they also offered same percentage of dividend which was more than the last two previous years. From that two years dividend pattern, we can say that firm is following constant pay out policy.
43
Jamuna Oil Company Limited does not give any information about dividend policy. But by the calculation we find out, that is following Regular dividend policy except in 2007. But in 2006 they did not give any dividend. Because the company come to market in 2007.
44
Conclusion:
The analysis of financial statements means different things to different people. It is of interest to creditors, present and prospective investors, and the firm`s own management. This report has presented the various financial statement analysis ratio useful in evaluating the firm`s present and future financial condition. This technique is ratio analysis, which provides relative measures of the performance and financial health of the company. The first involved ratio analysis for the company last five years; the second involved making comparisons with industry average, and third identify what dividend policy they follow. While ratio analysis is an effective tool for assessing a company`s financial condition.
Bibliography:
1. Lawrence J. Gitman Principles of Managerial Finance, 12th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall.
Websites:
http://www.jamunaoil.gov.bd/ http://www.summitpower.org/ http://www.titasgas.org.bd/
45