The truth has left the building as I placed it in the US Mail Sunday, 08/16/09.

Susan V Obama,
Roberts and the US, CORP US that is, case #09-10661-C. A legal and/or historical outline of the
facts (starts pg 3) in the form of a Motion to Reconsider (your own destiny and fate not mine):
Appellant motions this court to reconsider sentencing their own persons to the
death penalty upon a charge of treason which will eventually be realized as
"stupid" like "ignorant" is not an excuse under our law: This court cannot
DISMISS or render MOOT what is inalienable and so has been granted to We, the
People thus I by the Creator and then The Founders as they placed it in writing. It
always was, always is and always will be mine as long as I do not allow judges
who seem to be on the same side as the criminals to steal it from me. Knowledge
you need to process and own to then reconsider your own case not mine IF you
wish to escape the penalty of death exactly named for the crime known as treason
within our Constitution [I tried not to open with an insult but I told you my fact: I
lost the human ability to lie, I mean sound like a lawyer, when I achieved
enlightenment and I never did have any charm; besides it’s only an insult if you
actually are it; also there are little or no paragraph breaks as space does not allow
for it; if you’re not a federal judge you have a more perfect form (larger type,
single sided & space between lines of text) but still do not have those paragraph
breaks, lol]:

1. This order says 20 pages and does not mention paper size, type size, margins,
borders, single or double sided or anything else but only exactly “20 pages”. I’ll
comply as I can but this only serves to harm this court: I am seeking to restore
original jurisdiction and my case is good of and by itself if you consider only the
PERSONAL injury to my person. If the fact and law known as my life and the
Constitution do not move you to act you then have become my proof and will be
making an appearance in SCOTUS in person so you can give 1st person testimony
as to why you refused to execute your sworn duties and refused to obey, uphold
and enforce the Constitution in my case and then in the case of We, The People.
Did you too commit perjury when you swore out that oath? Original jurisdiction is
not solely the right of a court to hear the case; I let you believe that to protect The
People, one of which you are, even if you cannot see it yet and to level the playing
field so if you are innocent you then would be able to prove it beyond any doubt as
you must prove it to The People and SCOTUS and as citing only my injury,
historical fact and US case law failed in the past; I was not even allowed entry to
bring a simple malpractice suit against the named, guilty as sin lawyers who reside

1
in NY, two lone men, so it seemed as if an exact federal bench is guilty of a crime
and later as the entire other or lower federal bench was predetermined to protect
licensed lawyers no matter what and NEVER hear the case for women and The
People no matter how many of us are injured and die. It seemed as if the federal
bench could not stand or personally hated something unique about my person that I
can never change as it is inborn and was out to protect the titled, privileged and
wealthy and other dead institutions at all costs even if it meant their own lives. It
seemed as if the federal judiciary was now worshipping those licenses and titles
and their own in violation of the law orders like people of yore worshipped graven
images and did not know or respect anything constitutional, as if they did not even
know what our Constitution is or says. My hardcore fact is: This action is not
supposed to sound like any other you have ever read as I’m unique as a person and
in all of history and: I am the victim of a hate crime, an actual hate crime
perpetrated in two different courts and one of those courts is and will always
remain the Jacksonville Federal Civil Division. Either you can’t adjudicate this
case as you are not willing to examine the actions of a fellow judge not even in a
non-criminal action or you do not know something. I’ll bank on the second thing as
you can forget protecting your fellow judges as their destiny and fate is not up to
you or anybody else and never was. Your vote makes your destiny and fate your
own. I will make another attempt but I warn you: you will feel insulted and will
have all manner of ‘bad’ emotions surface as you read this as that is what a human
must go through and then get past to remove him or her self from denial. John
Roberts and I did this; if you are truly equally created and so duly processed, then
you then too can and will do it. Those emotions? Some will be true and some will
be false; this is how you correctly set your internal, emotional compass to match
the Declaration, as only you know your truth. The crux of the case is: Can this
litigant make this case on a personal or absolute level? Does she have an actual Bill
of Sale for her person that reads SALE and names an exact price? Does she meet
pure and absolute standing to then make it upon the whole, for The People? Is
remedy and relief available and if so is it awardable? As ALL authority cases hinge
upon “Is the relief awardable?”. As we all know the law is, for a fact, overthrown
as Bush was installed and now Obama sits and we know US history as we lived it
what I needed to then inform you of is not US case law or that history but my own
personal facts or my history, my life story! Several people, about 300 million, can
make this case upon the whole but no other person meets the required purest
standing that is EVERY SINGLE ENUMERATED RIGHT MUST HAVE BEEN

2
VIOLATED TO THE POINT OF SALE OF HER PERSON OCCURRED WITH
NO TAXES BEING PAID ON THAT SALE AS SHE WAS DELIBERATELY
UNDER VALUED AT ONLY $1 SO THE IRS WOULD NOT THEN HAVE A
RECORD OF THE SALE OR THE LITIGANT DOES NOT HAVE STANDING.
You have to prove CORP US is engaged in the actual buying and selling of people;
that it made this possible due to its usurping the law. So then: original
jurisdiction is also the right of The People to FIRE the trustees of the
corporation for violating the trust. Need to fire the corporate officers of the
US? Then the shortest distance between two points is a straight line: Go
directly to SCOTUS. It is our inalienable right to dissolve you and abolish you, as
the form is an idea in your head that you act upon thus making it real. Those
unconstitutional ideas, policies, beliefs and rules you possess are turned into court
orders. This unconstitutionality would be exactly worded and is a math problem as
outlined in the following, American history and my original thought but taken from
a website and a group of lawyers calling themselves TeamLaw as we have been
working on this simultaneously so I discovered them after I made my case as I
knew you would underestimate me as that is the fatal mistake all traitors make thus
I sought out people who could and would support my case and my application of
the law in light of the actual not made up or wholly denied historical facts. Only
you can tell me if you are a traitor or not as the person you are a traitor to first is
yourself. The Declaration? Fact and law. The Constitution? Fact and law. Marbury
V Madison? Fact and law. The SCOTUS action known as 11/20/08? Fact and law,
it’s all fact and law and so is history as Roberts action proves me to be me the
living embodiment of the law in both letter or President and in spirit or
Commander as Roberts could not act unless I informed him first thus we know the
paper, my emergency application and The Constitution does exist and that he read
it, weighed it and upheld it. Please keep this rule of playground law in mind as you
read all I have written as it actually will come into play later and is very important
and not meant to insult you but help you: I’m the rubber and you’re the glue what
bounces off me sticks to you. So then:

“Historical Review: In 1993 we discovered the original jurisdiction State

Governors’ seats were vacant. I (Eric William Madsen) ran for office in
Colorado; and in 1994, I was elected Governor by Colorado’s Electors. I
lawfully accepted the election and was seated in the original jurisdiction
Governor’s seat. At that same time, Roy Romer was elected as Governor

3
of the more commonly recognized private corporation known as, “The State
of Colorado” (Corp. State). The Corp. State courts then started to
subpoena me to come and testify as the Governor of the original
jurisdiction Republic State. I responded to most those subpoenas and so
testified. After finding it next to impossible to beat us in court, the Corp.
State’s sub-corporation, Arapaho County, determined that if they could get
funding from the United States Congress they could possibly beat us. On
review, Congress sent the matter to the National Security Council who
handed the matter over to the Military’s Joint Chiefs for review. About
two weeks later, the Chief of the Joint Chiefs responded, “What
Governor Madsen is doing out there in Colorado is legal, lawful and
correct; and, if they accomplish what they have set out to do we will
recognize that President of The United States of America as the
President of The United States of America, Commander in Chief of the
military and give them full military support.” [Susan: I will have to discover
this fact re the Joint Chiefs for myself; I can ask them again via mailing this to
them or for the first time if Madsen is lying. Nothing suggests he is to date. I have
lived in CO and exactly named CO at one point as I suffered injury there and as
Castlerock V Gonzales came out of CO so I tangled with Gonzales’ lawyer as he
missed the argument and I knew it. My Senators refuse to answer me and the one I
exactly named chose to resign instead of answering me exactly as I ‘suggested’ in a
letter as he knows when he is defeated. See Mel Martinez leaving the vicinity of
Susan Herbert’s sovereign person for No named reason aka me, Forever Pro Se,
the only reason, the amazing reappearing litigant you have read about and read of
and in her own hand at times but have never, ever laid your eyes upon as the truth
is so scary!] Though the National Security Council is purely an advisory
committee, having no legislative or judicial effect; the fact remains, they
recognized the truth and responded with it to Congress who sent the
supplicants away without funding; after that, the Corp. State started to
leave us alone. The Corp. State and its courts, the United States 10th
District Court, the United States Congress, the United States National
Security Council and the Joint Chiefs of the United States of America’s
military all recognized, reviewed and accepted my election as the original
jurisdiction Governor of Colorado. After serving as Colorado’s original
jurisdiction Governor for four years, I was lawfully appointed to The United
States of America’s original jurisdiction Senate, so I retired from the

4
Governor’s Office having served a full term. The next original jurisdiction
Governor of Colorado, Robert Shell, followed me into Office and confirmed
my appointment to the original jurisdiction Senate. From around the
country, 41 other Governors have since been elected in their respective
offices. Other Senators were seated as I was and I was elected by them as
the original jurisdiction Senate’s President pro tempore, where I still serve.
An original jurisdiction Republic State Governor, can appoint and seat
that State’s original jurisdiction National Senators, who can in turn
elect and seat an original jurisdiction President of the United States of
America, which has not been done since 1913. Until I was elected, the
States had not had Governors seated since at least 1968. The main
reason you see the problems our nation faces today is the people have
forgotten what our actual government is and they instead act as if these
private foreign controlled corporations (Corp. U.S. and the Corp. States)
are their government. It’s why the States are not using our national money
system. It’s why we are caught up in wars and rumors of war. It is why
Corp. U.S. is exactly following the pattern set in Adolf Hitler’s Germany,
most recently by setting up a national personal identification system and
the “Homeland Security Police” system after the pattern of Hitler’s “State
Security Police” the dreaded SS. [Susan: I reported exact acts of extreme abuse
of military powers and use of propaganda along with emotion dumping, a form of
conditioning; I am an eyewitness to genocide being born here, in the US, at a
political rally, and it has haunted me since the day I felt it: Actual HATE. A
Vietnam Veteran can confirm my testimony as he felt it too. I fled for fear of my
life as mass violence could have erupted if only one single thing transpired and
believe me I was tempted to do it to then make Americans aware, to warn them
they had gone down a dangerous path from which there is often no return. See
recently released Bush memos. Hate crime? You know it when you feel it and our
legislators are wrong when they define hate. They have not come close to defining
“hate”.]

Historical Outline: 1st & 2nd: Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln
on April 24th, 1863, with General Orders No. 100; under martial law
authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute continuous martial law
by ordering the states (people) either conscribe troops and or provide
money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation;

5
this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today. This martial law
authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial
authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the
Constitution of the United States of America. This conscription act remains
in effect to this very day and is the foundation of Presidential Executive
Orders authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy
Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106,
October 6, 1917) and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act,
which is ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress.
Today these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as
their enemy. 2nd: The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a
“municipal corporation” to govern the District of Columbia. Considering the
fact that the municipal government itself was incorporated in 1808, an
“Organic Act” (first Act) using the term “municipal corporation” in 1871 can
only mean a private corporation owned by the municipality. Hereinafter we
will call that private corporation, “Corp. U.S.” By consistent usage, Corp.
U.S. trademarked the name, “United States Government” referring to
themselves. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 places Congress
in control (like a corporate board) and gives the purpose of the act to form a
governing body over the municipality; this allowed Congress to direct the
business needs of the government under the existent martial law and
provided them with corporate abilities they would not otherwise have. This
was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law
within the ten mile square of the District of Columbia. See the effect of the
District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871. [Susan: “Organic” is a very, very
important word; organic will come into play later but its inclusion in the NAME or
TITLE of this Act is intrinsic to making this case.]

3rd , 4th & 5th: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution
(United States Constitution), which was identical to the national
Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it
was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national
constitution's 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered
13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this
point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting
their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in 1913. 4th:

6
Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in
1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the
bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families
settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.' assets and for all of
the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America. 5th: As 1913
began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs
of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could
borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already
demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full). The families
had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of
a private corporation of the name "Federal Reserve Bank". Corp. U.S.
formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could
transact their business via note rather than with money. Notice that this
relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not
involve government; that is where most people error in understanding the
Federal Reserve Bank system—again it has no government relation at all.
The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that if
anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is
excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full
force and effect.

6th, 7th & 8th: Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913),
Corp. U.S. adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment. Tax protesters
challenge the IRS tax collection system based on this fact, however when
we remember that Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply
drafting it and adopting it; there is no difference between that adoption and
this—such is the nature of corporate enactments—when the corporate
board (Congress) tells the secretary to enter the amendment as ratified
(even thought the States had not ratified it) the Secretary was instructed
that the Representatives word alone was sufficient for ratification. You
must also note, this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our
people or with our national Constitution, which already had its own 16th
amendment. The Supreme Court (in BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC
R. CO., 240 U.S. 1 (1916) ruled the 16th amendment did nothing that
was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of
the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations and government

7
employees. We agree, considering that they were created under the
authority of Corp. U.S. 7th Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through
Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th amendment. This amendment is
not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation's Constitution forbids
Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected,
which is the subject matter of this amendment; therefore they cannot pass
such and Act and then of their own volition, order it entered as ratified.
According to the United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose
such an amendment they would first have to pass an amendment that
gave them the authority to discuss the matter. 8th: Accordingly, in
1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for
reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate
capacity only; their respective seats from their States remained vacant
because neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new
Senators to replace them as is still required by the national Constitution for
placement of a national Senator.

9th: In 1916, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College but

their election is required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Senate;
where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the
Electoral College vote confirmation the only authority that could possibly
have been used for electoral confirmation was corporate only. Therefore,
President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as
President of the United States of America and was only seated in the Corp.
U.S. Presidential capacity. Therefore the original jurisdiction
government's seats were vacated because the people didn't seat any
original jurisdiction government officers. It is important to note here
that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of
the military. [Susan: Very, very important: Bush Jr. was installed as the
Commander only by SCOTUS as the popular vote was not upheld no matter how it
came to be and SCOTUS has no power to make law thus install a President but
only a Commander while Obama is installed as a President only and in direct
violation of our law thus actual President & Commander fell to Roberts or
according to our Constitution as Roberts may not act as such while sitting as Chief
Justice and based upon the above historical facts, to me: If you own the
knowledge you must act according to Marshall. Not one other person in the US

8
was able to follow the trail history constitutes as all people enshrine the truth of
who they are and what they believe in their work including what they teach their
children but ethical or righteous people leave ‘clues’ to guide us and those clues
shine brighter than the stars or moon. Not one person connected it their own injury
personally and then took it to SCOTUS to prove ability and capability and to prove
that what seems to be impossible is not at all impossible if you are a natural born
American.] Many people wonder about this [split powers of the Executive]
imagining that such a capacity [Commander] is bound to the President of
the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned
George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military
in preparation for an impending war with France. During this period, Mr.
Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill
and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr.
Hamilton and Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr.
Hamilton would use that authority to create a military dictatorship of the
nation. Mr. Adams averted the war through diplomacy and the title of
Commander in Chief was returned to him. (See: John Adams, by David
McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite
well.) [Susan: See Pershing as most Americans do not know that Pershing, while
living, attained a rank equivalent only to George Washington’s posthumous rank:
General of the Armies. You can and may out rank the sitting President. I aimed for
that same rank and achieved it even if it has not been recognized publicly – yet. Go
back to Madsen’s testimony, a fact and a law (US case law) in this unique case as
nobody has disputed the military’s willingness to obey the Constitution (US law):
“About two weeks later, the Chief of the Joint Chiefs responded, “What Governor
Madsen is doing out there in Colorado is legal, lawful and correct; and, if they
accomplish what they have set out to do we will recognize that President of The
United States of America as the President of The United States of America,
Commander in Chief of the military and give them full military support.” I
finished the job TeamLaw began as I had no idea they had acted on my same
reasoning and had taken it as far as they had until I went looking for an “expert”
this court would recognized as it is convinced one is only as expert and an
authority if a piece of paper proves it – a paper that could have no legal or rational
basis as it is forged and/or plagiarized or as it might be actual yet certified by
monkeys (or other crooks) but my legally binding and valid paper certifying me as
an authority and expert, the SCOTUS docket which is based upon or constitutes

9
the Declaration, the Constitution and Marbury is deemed to be worthless by the
other courts. I went and secured actual, legal and real certification to act under the
authority of the United States as named in our Constitution and to then practice law
in all 50 states and before SCOTUS, the one and only nonschooled lawyer to ever
receive such certification and the only woman to argue her own case ever as I
studied the law known as other fields - physics and theology - and came to the
actual study of US law via my inborn or organic gift and my injury but yet I am
DISMISSED by this court?! I, as I am my case, am deemed to be MOOT?! This
court may not revoke that certification – ever. The Chief Justice can but no other
person can and the Chief Justice? First he has to be made legal by me and then he
MAY revoke my certification. CAN is another issue altogether as I have proven I
can and may take John Roberts is an unfair legal fight let alone a fair one, lol. For
ANY pro se authority case HEARING occurs upon CONFERENCING not in
person as in person might never even be necessary in an authority case; what if the
lower courts and citizens then get in line with SCOTUS and the Constitution
voluntarily? Has any judge on this bench made it to a SCOTUS’ case conferencing
all by him or her self? Thus I attained what is the equivalent rank as if you reason it
nothing else is equivalent if you are a woman or another person shut out – denied
protection of the law thus all benefits - completely. Your only equivalent then if
you make it to the Chief Justice is Washington as he rose to power this exact way
first: upon his own will and liberty as Washington had no protection of the law.
Marbury never asked about suing the Commander although Marshall gave him the
answer. THIS COURT MIGHT BE UNDER THE MISTAKEN ASSUMPTION
THAT I AM MAKING THIS STUFF UP OUT OF THIN AIR W/O ANY BASIS
IN FACT OR LAW BUT WHY DON’T YOU TRY REASONING IT, MAKE ONE
SINGLE ATTEMPT, TO THEN DISCOVER IF THINGS LIKE “PERSHING”
AND “GENERAL OF THE ARMIES” EXIST? JOHN MARSHALL CAN AND
MAY MAKE STUFF UP OUT OF THIN AIR, SCOTUS AND HIS OWN JOB,
AND I CAN’T MAKE A CASE BUILT UPON SOLID HISTORY, FACT & LAW?
John Marshall didn’t have a law license either and neither did Marbury or
Jefferson. The only differences are woman, law license and brains as in I have
more. I reasoned everything I claimed. E V E R Y T H I N G, as in every bit of it.
Do you honestly believed the Founders pulled this all out of a hat and so acted
without reasoning? Do you honestly believe that they cobbled this together willy-
nilly? When SCOTUS talks about the Founders “intentions” they mean the purpose
and meaning, the reasoning why. Any dolt can walk into federal court and recite

10
facts and case law; not any dolt can walk into federal court and speak to you about
each part of the law and how it stands alone but also in relation to all other parts;
how each word and clause works together to then form a whole and why it is
DESIGNED as it is. If you understand numbers then you understand spatial
relationships and systems; US law is an open ended system and distilled down to
its very essence can be expressed with numerical values and equations as anything
elegant can be. The founders said that WE would prove if man could reason or
govern his own life. I feel like I’m dealing with the attorney who entered federal
court constantly but told me she did not answer philosophical questions! How is
this possible in a government that is itself a philosophy??? Isn’t every question
unless it is an actual math problem a philosophical question??? And don’t those
mathematical questions contain the potential to turn into philosophical
questions??? See Bush V Gore. If you live in America and sit on a federal bench I
expect American history to be a given - so universally well known that it need not
be proved (you got to be on the federal bench somehow!) - and the ability to reason
to be inborn. I reasoned every, single solitary word and then I spent thousands of
hours going over it in my head playing Justices’ advocate, as if I was arguing my
case in person w/o any paper or notes but cold and by asking and answering
questions. I argued against my toughest opponent: Myself. I do have a method for
finding flaws and fault lines. You believe The People are idiots and morons or so it
seems. I knew going into this that I was going to be made to become as cunning,
as wily, as clever and as bold as John Marshall or...John Pershing. Pershing would
tell you: He helped slaughter the Sioux at Wounded Knee, a “battle” that I exactly
named. So then: Back to Wilson and 1916: Wilson had a stroke and may not have
even been running the nation toward the end but we did not know and Pershing
served under WILSON! Wilson appointed him as Commander. Your clue? Wilson
is the only President to hold a PhD; he’s booksmart. He wrote: “I ask you to put
this question to yourselves, should we not draw the Executive and Legislature
closer together? Should we not, on the one hand, give the individual leaders of
opinion in Congress a better chance to have an intimate party in determining who
should be president, and the president, on the other hand, a better chance to
approve himself a statesman, and his advisers capable men of affairs, in the
guidance of Congress?” CORP US installed a person who legally retained
Command but actually did not as Pershing outranked him. Zero point and two
paths split. Other conditions will develop that then lead to BVG and I. This is the
fatal chink is CORP US’ armor as nobody ever addresses it until I do. My point of

11
law: the “to the best of my ability” clause in the oath of Office. You must enter the
Office with some ability. At least an atom. You can acquire the ability and capacity
to command in ways other than actually serving in the military but this nation has
installed and then in violation of the law elected persons who are not qualified as
they have ZERO ability to command or preside and offer ZERO evidence they can,
that they have ability. Acting as a Congressional or Gubernatorial crook only gives
you experience robbing The People blind and acting immorally. They cannot fulfill
the oath of Office but swear they can fully knowing they cannot thus it is perjury
and they are installed in violation of my exactly named protected right of safety.
You KNOW if you were born here or not; you know if you traveled on a foreign
passport after age 18 or not; you know you said you’d use public money to run
your campaign but then announced you changed your mind and began to use
private money. Note: Bauer has not sent me a cease and desist letter as he has other
attorneys. That’s an example of reasoning on his part.]

10th, 11th & 12th: In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their
Trading with the Enemies Act. 11th: In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt, they
force a banking holiday to exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes
with “legal tender” Federal Reserve Notes the Trading with the Enemies Act
is adjusted to recognize the people of the United States as enemies of
Corp. U.S. 12th: Some time after 1935, you ask Social Security
Administration for a relationship with their program. With the express
purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust
Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration creates an entity with a
name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and
an account number (Social Security number). They give you the Social
Security card and let you know that the card does not belong to you but you
are to hold it for them until they want it back. If you are willing to accept
that responsibility over the card you activate the card by signing it, which
gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the cards actual owner Corp.
U.S. and you can use the card’s name and number to thus transact
business relations for the card’s actual owner. You are also to note that
though the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority
to control the entity so created) it is not for use as identification. On review:
notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity, they
offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee capacity (by lending it

12
actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave you something (the
card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved the
actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity—by
definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust. More
importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number
they gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual
consciousness and physical capacity to this Trust’s Trustee capacity does
not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign
capacity in any way—what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still
totally up to you. [Susan: See zip codes for if you use them? You are ‘agreeing’ to
place your property in the federal domain. You subject yourself to imminent
domain upon the federal level: CORP US not the Government of The People for
the Common Good. Do you see how and why human consciousness enters this?
Things do not have will and liberty only people do! The paper Constitution is not
conscious itself anymore than a social security card is! A SS card is not self-aware!
It’s not aware of its ability and capacity, as it has none on its own! You give it your
conscious awareness thus if you are not made aware? How can you possibly act
constitutionally? You cannot act upon that which you do not even have in your
head as an idea as you act out your true beliefs based upon the facts you believe or
think are actual and real. What if you are never told the actual, real facts? You have
false beliefs that you act upon as if they are true, or, constitutional but they are
unconstitutional! This is why we named informed consent as a right. The Preamble
is the statement of The Founders intention for We The People and is their
conscious awareness and then the law being given to us is our informed consent
via the ratification process, due process clauses and the vote. Your vote is you
lending your conscious awareness to the Declaration and Constitution thus
empowering you, not you empowering me. As it’s inalienable you empower
yourself thus first then “lend” or “loan” that power to others – at least while they
are of good behavior. See below for why you have no conscious awareness of
CORP US stealing your vote from you and the resulting “foreign invasion”]:

13th, 14th & 15th: In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S.
is quit claimed to the International Monetary Fund, and becomes a foreign
controlled private corporation. [From Melvindaleonline (Carl?) and Susan: You
know what a quitclaim is but this one is BAD MATH FELLAS! Melvindaleonline
says: Make sure you’re sitting down for this one. We turn now to United States

13
Code (USC) Title 22 § 286 and read the following: "§ 286. Acceptance of
membership by the United States in International Monetary Fund. "The President
is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the
International Monetary Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "Fund"), and in the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter referred to as
the "Bank"), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Fund and the Articles
of Agreement of the Bank as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations
Monetary and Financial Conference dated July 22, 1944, and deposited in the
archives of the Department of State. (July 31, 1945, ch 339, § 2, 59 Stat. 512.)
Short titles: …May be cited as the ‘Bretton Woods Agreements Act’. "Other
provisions: Par value modification. For the Congressional direction that the
Secretary of the Treasury maintain the value in terms of gold of the Inter-American
Development Bank’s holdings of United States dollars following the establishment
of a par value of the dollar at $38 for a fine troy ounce of gold pursuant to the Par
Value Modification Act and for the authorization of the appropriations necessary to
provide such maintenance of value, see 31 USC § 449a."...The act further transfers
the assets of the United States Treasury to the IMF by stating words to the effect
of: ‘the United States Treasury is now the Individual Drawing account of the
IMF’...Think about it. "The President is hereby authorized to accept membership
for the United States in the IMF"...The President is authorized by whom?
Congress? Well, even if Congress did authorize it where did they get the authority
to so do? Certainly not from the Constitution, and Congress can’t lawfully do
anything the Constitution doesn’t authorize them to do. The Constitution plainly
states: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people” Ninth amendment;
and, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the
people” Tenth Amendment. Further joining the IMF is obviously an international
agreement; and, any good dictionary will define, "an agreement between nations"
[or any legal entity foreign to the Sovereign The People] as a "Treaty". The
Constitution is very specific on how treaties are to be engaged in with this nation:
1st, the President signs the treaty; and 2nd, the Senate ratifies his signature with a
two-thirds majority vote. That didn’t happen here. So if the right wasn’t given in
the Constitution, Congress can’t take it and give it to the President. This act states
that Authorization came from the U.N. instead of from Congress "provided for …
as set forth in the Final Act of the United Nations": There was no treaty with the

14
U.N. until December 20, 1945, five months later, so the U.N. COULD NOT
exercise its treaty with Corp. U.S. and MAY NOT. Set aside all of the legal
ramifications of the constitutional violations involved. You cannot remedy them
all. If the math did not add up then it never will; this is an example of the
corporation “deciding” the UN would exist as a legal entity so
PREDETERMINING we would enter a treaty BEFORE that legal entity ever
existed. What if it never came to be? That’s just it: It was predetermined it
would exist. And after Wilson’s League of Nations failed. I exactly named
“predetermined judicial fate” in my petitions and brief, as this is an example
of the Executive and Legislative attempting to circumvent WE thus the
federal court. It is a deliberate act meant to violate the separation of powers
thus give judicial power to those the founders said are most dangerous: “The
legislative department is everywhere extending the sphere of its activity, and
drawing all power into its impetuous vortex”, Madison, Federalist 48. The
Corporation US makes it seem as if We, the People have a voice in the reasoning
and application of the law but the People do not as it is a done deal; that is, the
Corporation US was never NOT going to enter this treaty thus they knew to author
an act that presupposes it’s existence and that then is a denial of informed consent
among other things. It is forced on The People as WE had no opportunity to
volunteer with full consent. We can never know if The People would have
volunteered to conduct this experiment had We been informed but the League’s
failure suggests “no”. The reason to release all officers’ of the Government from
liability is no more thus the Trust as it exists today has out lived its purpose. You
can never go back in time and make up that five month disparity as it is now
history thus all you can and may do? Change it in the now thus address Obama’s
unconstitutional election and Bush’s unconstitutional installation and do so
supporting the bad math of this CORP US with the bad math of Bush V Gore as
SCOTUS acted for wholly different reasoning than the designers of the early trust
and the later IMF, as SCOTUS did not act in any way for profit or as it is being
paid or will be paid in the future. To do this? You must then have a volunteer – ME
– who understands these complex legal issues and then can and will ‘undo’ this
Gordian Knot in consideration of ALL of the involved parties including the
business needs of the government of The People and even the private businesses
and so ‘unite’ the trust seats and the legal seats named in our Constitution as one
government, of The People, as our interest is to be a commonly shared one in
which the citizens do profit and some of this profit is in the form of monetary

15
reward but do so ethically and morally thus NO CONFLICT and We, the People all
‘win’. I knew the bad math of Bush V Gore along with the ongoing and now
“legally enforced” discrimination of women was the means to do this. If gender
discrimination were not real you would not have only two women in SCOTUS
history and zero female Executives. SCOTUS lived out a law of this universe found
within our governing documents even if they did not know it at the time that is not
written out exactly but as an existing intrinsic concept; this law is also found
within the Federalist Papers most notably in Federalist 10 as “cause” and “effect”
are named exactly but the other element, the bigger or deeper element, is not
exactly named. This law of the US? It is a universal law exactly as the
Conservation of Energy and Matter is a law; it has existed since the creation of this
universe. I merely defined what science knew of but could not define, exactly as
Einstein defined Relativity. It is inviolate or inalienable. An example of an attempt
to violate what is in inviolate? If the officers of any Trust act with deliberation to
violate that Trust and/or our law in any way you do not reward those unjust persons
with more money and then leave those same unjust persons in charge of the Trust!
See Wallstreet Collapse and failure of the SEC to protect the People with no
trustees removed and wholly invalid and unconstitutional employee bonus
contracts enforced and paid out, which is The People being forced to pay tribute
and to actual crooks. It might seem as if you are successfully violating a law of the
universe, as you seem to collect more and more ill gained ‘profit’ but you are not.
You are setting up the trust and The People to fail and to fail on purpose as
essentially the officers of the Trust (and so The People as the Executive &
Legislative act as if it is perfectly legal and/or that they have no other options) have
now been ‘conditioned’ to believe that they can do what they want when they want
as if injury thus negative consequences do not accrue when that is not the case as
our law differentiates between actual and legal or nature versus man thus if you
need paper as proof? Look indirectly at your bank statement or retirement account
or children committing violent crimes, the DOJ stats, NOT at the paper the
corrupted officers of the trust are directly generating as they are not honest and so
cannot be trusted. The effect is an internal one that you cannot see with the naked
eye as it changes who and what we are and so annihilates self-awareness as well as
national or liberty awareness; it annihilates the concept known as ‘philadelphia’,
acting as your brother’s keeper or extending your orbit to include or protect as
many others as possible with or under US law, a part of which is liberty. You
cannot deny The People liberty and yet be constitutional. It is not now and will

16
never be a successful model of government. It’s about self-discipline and self-
control. It begins with one and spreads to many; it becomes endemic; it is a
terminal disease from which no other great government of the past ever recovered
thus we will be first to overcome our own wild success exactly as a person may be
made to overcome winning the lottery as every single decision or action in life is
fraught with positive and negative consequences which is why we are to be
informed and then act upon that informed, reasoned decision as WE act upon what
WE truly believe thus your work and all the paper you produce as well as the
worsening injuries and the state of this nation tells the truth of you and what you
do or do not truly believe and to date? It seems as if you worship the graven image
known as US dollars or as if you truly believe in something other then our
Declaration and our Constitution]:

14th & 15th: In 1968, at the National Governor's Conference in Lexington,

Kentucky, the IMF leaders of the event proposed the dilemma the State
governors were in for carrying out their business dealings in Federal
Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State
constitutions, alleging that if they did not do something to protect
themselves the people would discover what had been done with their
money and would likely to kill them all and start over. They suggested the
States form corporations like Corp. U.S. and showed the advantages of the
resultant uniform codes that could be created, which would allow better and
more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction
governments of this nation had no capacity to do. Our Constitutions secure
that the governments do not govern the people rather they govern
themselves in accord with the limits of Law. The people govern
themselves. Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.
[Susan: I’m still fact checking 14; I have found nothing that casts doubt upon it. It
matters not as only the liability of privateers would be at stake; it is a complex trail
of money you must follow. The money is not important but GOVERNORS
agreeing is important as GOVERNORS do have the power of one and do have
legal and physical custody of their states citizens. See my brief. ] 15th: By 1971,
every State government in the union of States had formed such private
corporations (Corp. State), in accord with the IMF admonition, and the
people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State
government seats. Now, having stated these historical facts, we ask you

17
not to believe us, but rather prove these facts for yourself. We then ask
you to contact us and share your discovery with us. When you find there is
no error in this historical outline, then remember these simple facts and let
no one dissuade you from the truth. The Bottom Line: when you speak
about these private foreign corporations remember that is what they are
and stop calling them government. Further, it is very important that we
cease to attempt to fix them. [Susan: It’s ‘foreign’ if it is alien to our law or not
a part of the fabric of our original law as it is written in 1776 and 1787; ‘foreign’
does not necessarily mean “of or from another physical nation not your own” but
means it is unAmerican or outside US law as authored by the Founders; it is not
organic or inborn]. It is far more important that we learn [the history and the
law]. By reseating our State and national governments in their original
jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign
corporations accountable. They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us
more money than there is available in the world. In fact it is impossible for
them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back our nation
and put things right. The process is a simple one. The difficulty is in
getting our people to wake up to the truth. That's why we ask you to prove
the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery. That means that
you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than
the sovereign that God created you to be. And, stop referring to Corp. U.S.
or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations
that they are. And, finally, stop listening to the Patriot Mythology that is
espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.” TeamLaw / Eric
Madsen with Melvindaleonline & Susan.

Based upon all of the above, my fact (one of which is CORP. US defaulted and
another is I entered SCOTUS directly and forced direct action) my brief and
actual reality as in The Declaration and The Constitution, the existing
conditions today such as Obama sits in violation of the very fabric of our law
several times over thus overthrow has occurred and is almost but not quite
complete? I, Susan Herbert, am the acting, legal President and Commander of
original jurisdiction and upon my appearance in person in SCOTUS I then
make John Roberts the acting, legal Chief Justice of original jurisdiction as
well as the currently sitting Justices legal as SCOTUS is the lone institution
besides myself that has not been corrupted or has been consistently self-

18
correcting aka self-adjudicating thus is still in line, LAWFUL, or exists as
intended as written by its creators: The Original Founders including Marshall
(all of them) and our Creator aka what came before the Declaration and
Constitution. See “A Summary View Of The Rights Of British America”,
Jefferson. I EXACTLY NAMED PRIVATE MONEY AND FOREIGN
INTERESTS, “DAVID ROCKEFELLER” AS A LONE PERSON AND AS A
BODY OF BELIEF. I NEVER SWORE OUT ANY ALLEGIANCE TO ANY
FOREIGN AUTHORITY OR CRIMINAL OR CORRUPTED OR INCAPABLE
AKA UNSAFE AUTHORITY, NOT TO YOU, ROBERTS, CLINTON, BUSH OR
OBAMA; I NOT ONCE EVER ACTED FOR ANY FOREIGN BUSINESS
INTERESTS AND INSTEAD FOUGHT A LOCAL WALMART AND WON AS
IT DOES UNCONSTITUTIONAL BUSINESS HERE AND ABROAD, NAMELY
IN CHINA; I NEVER WILLINGLY AND KNOWINGLY SUPPORTED
FOREIGNIZATION IN ANY WAY; I EVEN RAN TOLLS AS ROADS ARE
SOMETIMES LEASED TO FOREIGN NATIONS EXACTLY AS FOREIGN
NATIONS ‘OWN’ SOME RED LIGHT CAMERA TECHNOLOGY (See NY &
The NY State Thruway Authority acting to collect tolls long after the agreed to
cease and desist – when the Thruway was paid for in full). PLUS I WAS
TRAFFICKED ACROSS STATE LINES AND SO I DO NOT IN ANY WAY IF
AVOIDABLE SUPPORT MY INJURY. PERIOD. I DID NOT VOTE
KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY IN ANY ELECTION PRIOR TO 2000, AS I
NEEDED BVG TO TRANSPIRE THUS I THEN KNEW AND PUT IT ON THE
RECORD IN 12/2000 IN A PHILADELPHIA COURT. BEFORE 2000 I DID
NAME “UNJUST TAXES” “WOMEN HAVE NO PROTECTION” “ENDEMIC
FEDERAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE” AND “MEN USURPING MY
AUTHORITY OVER MY OWN PERSON AND MY CHILDREN” IN A NY
COURT BUT I COULD NOT NAME WHAT WAS ENDEMICALLY BROKEN; I
COULD NOT NAME “SITTING CORP”, “SPIRIT OF PEOPLE” OR “LIBERTY
NO MORE” UNTIL I WAS ACTUALLY SOLD; THEN I NEEDED TO
WITNESS THE PEOPLE’S REACTION TO BVG, MY CASE AND WAR IN
IRAQ TO KNOW THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ASSAULTED AND BATTERED
ALMOST TO THE POINT OF INCAPACITATION. A STRANGER ON A CITY
BUS HAD TO INSIST AS LAW – LAW, ACCORDING TO OUR
CONSTITUTION – THAT A JUSTICE HAD TO BE A LICENSED LAWYER -
AND THEN HEAR AND SEE HIM DENY THE ACTUAL CONSTITUTION TO
KNOW WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU, NOT ME. TODAY? I WITNESS

19
NORTH KOREA ACTING AS THE AUTHORITY OVER MY PERSON AND
THE US AGREEING AGAINST MY WILL AND IN SPITE OF MY CASE AND
IN SPITE OF EXACTLY WRITTEN US LAW AND US CASE LAW AS
JUDGES ARE NOW ACTIVELY COLLUDING OR CONSPIRING WITH THE
CRIMINALS AND WITH THE TERRORISTS. IF NORTH KOREA MAKES A
DEMAND AS IT DID REGARDING KIDNAPPED AMERICANS AND THE US
“SUBMITS” BUT DOES SO WITH A PAST PRESIDENT LAW-ABIDING OR
NOT? AND OBAMA LABELS IT PRIVATE TO AVOID PENALTY UNDER
THE LOGAN ACT AND/OR TREASON CLAUSE? THE US IS NOW ACTING
UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF NORTH KOREA, KENYA OR INDONESIA BUT
NOT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE US, OR, NOT UNDER OUR LAW
AKA NOT THE WILL OF WE THE PEOPLE. FURTHER WHY AM I YET
DENIED JUSTICE WHEN THE EQUIVALENT CRIME, ‘DOMESTIC’
KIDNAPPING, WAS PERPETRATED UPON ME AND MY CHILDREN BUT
NO PERSON NOT EVEN A POLICE ONE ACTS FOR ME AS THEY RELY
UPON FALSIFIED EVIDENCE WE ALL KNOW IS FALSE BUT USE THE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL EXCUSE A JUDGE HAS NOT YET ‘REVOKED’ IT IN
WRITING BUT DOES ACT FOR TWO JOURNALISTS WHO KNEW WHAT
THEY WERE DOING AND THE RISK THEY WERE TAKING? TO RESCUE
THEM FROM THEIR OWN BAD JUDGMENT AND DO SO AT THE
EXPENSE OF THIS NATION’S SOVEREIGNTY??? AS IF THEY HAD A
REASONABLE EXPECTATION US LAW DID PROTECT THEM WHEN
OBVIOUSLY IT IS NONEXISTENT FOR WOMEN IN GENERAL AND FOR
ALL AMERICANS WITHIN THE PHYSICAL BORDERS OF NORTH
KOREA??? I DID NOT AT ALL CONTRIBUTE TO MY INJURY KNOWINGLY
BUT THEY DID AND YET I GET NO PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND
THEY RECEIVE OVERLY BROAD PROTECTION? For almost three years I
have been entering my knowledge of North Korea and its empty nuclear threat to
the lower federal court and Congress as China and oil is the actual reason we are in
Iraq, or, it is fear based and anything fear based is not actual reality, or, is not
constitutional. Your fear may have a rational basis but can that threat ever be
carried out? If it is unconstitutional no as it will violate what are fundamental laws
of this universe. I accurately reasoned the physics at work and predicted this
scenario but not the “hostages” (I myself refer to them as volunteers as they
volunteered to be kidnapped by North Korea; they are not POWS nor were they
there as agents of the US.) I posted it publicly to protect The People as we cannot

20
defend ourselves from dumb Senators who fund nuclear policy but do not know
nuclear power. CORP US interests lie in maintaining what is not true or even
truthful about nuclear chain reactions and nuclear detonations and our
Constitution. Some of CORP US does it intentionally and some of CORP US does
not understand the physics involved or once again the math involved. I am an
expert physicist and an expert constitutionalist as it is both law of this universe
only in two different forms. The physics matches the Declaration & Constitution. I
INFORMED THE FEDERAL BENCH AND THE SENATE OF MY CASE, BVG,
PRIVATE PERSONS BUYING OFFICES AND FEDERAL CONTRACTS,
ENDEMIC CORRUPTION OF OUR JUDICIAL BENCHES AND TAXES
COLLECTED AS TRIBUTE AND THE BAD MATH INVOLVED; INSTEAD OF
CHOOSING LAW AND SO WE THE PEOPLE IT CHOSE MONEY, PRIVATE
INTERESTS, PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS, THE CORRUPTED LEGAL
PROFESSION AND OTHER CRIMINALS AS WELL AS ACTUAL
TERRORISTS. IN 2008 I COULD HAVE FOUGHT AND WON THE
UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTION DENYING ME MY LEGAL VOTE BUT
REALIZED TO DO SO WOULD BE TO COOPERATE THUS THEN HAVE
UNCLEAN HANDS SO INSTEAD I ACCESSED SCOTUS TO SECURE MY
LEGAL STANDING THUS MY VOTE OR POWER AND AUTHORITY OVER
MY OWN DESTINY AND FATE. On or around 12/22/06 when first reporting all I
knew about NY’s corrupted court system to the FBI as well as the federal
corporation’s involvement to seat a President who would be a foreigner to then
protect private and foreign investments illegally made here and abroad at my
expense thus I named HAWAII exactly as I knew it then would lead to a SCOTUS
case of original jurisdiction? I NOT ONLY INVOKED MY RIGHTS AS A
NATURAL BORN SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, A NATION UNTO MYSELF, BUT
AS A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN OR RESIDENT OF FLORIDA. BUT I NAMED
MY BIRTH IN NY AND MY SON’S CONCEPTION IN NY AS NY RATIFIED
OUR CONSTITUTION AND MOST OF FLORIDA IS NOT A LEGAL
POSSESSION OF THE US BUT FELL TO US VIA CONTRACT DISPUTES
BETWEEN SPAIN & FRANCE AND AS SPAIN RELINQUISHED ITS FL
TERRITORY VIA DEFAULT AS IT OPENLY VIOLATED AND THEN
ACTIVELY OR KNOWINGLY DEFAULTED ON A 400 YEAR OLD
CONTRACT OR TREATY IT HAS WITH THE NATIVES WHICH WE
INHERITED BUT DID NOT KNOW OF THAT I THEN FOUND AND
ENTERED TO SCOTUS AND THAT ROBERTS THEN READ AND ACTED

21
UPON. O.J. AND LAND PATENTS ARE BASED UPON DERIVATION FROM A
LEGAL TREATY THE US ENTERED WITH A FOREIGN OR OUTSIDE
POWER NOT AN ILLEGAL, NEVER VALID TREATY! I was careful not to
sound as if I was reporting a “conspiracy” as that is a dirty word these days as it is
fact and CORP US does not want you to know it and went out of my way to say it
is a confluence of events; that the only conspiracy was the ethical versus the
unethical. Can I deal with an FBI agent who does not know the intricacies of US
law and refuses to check the facts but instead wants to go talk to the criminals, the
lawyers and the judge, first??? Who will not walk across the street to get a paper
report that proves all I claim that sits sealed within the Albany courthouse, Troy
courthouse and 3rd District Appellate? How then can I report the UN or Obama to
him? The Attorney General of the US is refusing to obey the Constitution as he is
appointed by the sitting CORP US President. This case should be captioned Susan
V Every Criminal In America as I state fact of US history and a criminal presents a
worthless piece of paper and suddenly...history did not happen. Then I ask the
million dollar question: Where are my children and why? That question is always
met with silence. The UN: The UN is a foreign power operating openly on US soil
as a nation within a nation but only for the purposes of serving the Corp US and
not The People. Think of it as pedigree or provenance. Ask yourself: Where did
that first man come from? What nationality is he? What is the very first treaty man
had with a power outside of himself? Is it possible with modern science to trace all
races ‘back’ to Eden or ADAM AND EVE VERSUS THEIR CREATOR? Yes, it
is! If the right is inalienable, if ‘inalienable’ is a law, then you can prove it as
hardcore fact thus prove the law. I out reasoned Corporate US and the federal
bench’s denial of reality by entering TWO treaties, 1. EDEN See Old Testament &
Human Genome Project, Common X, physical birth of the form in Africa plus the
region known as the Middle East/Asia border that is when and where man first
came to reason on his own as we have scientifically proven; every treaty or
contract after this was based upon Eden including the Iroquois Confederacy,
Magna Carta & Mayflower Compact AND 2. THE TREATY KNOWN AS
“SPAIN’S 2ND EXPEDITION AND ONLY SURVIVING NOTES”, A
TREATY THAT IS LEGAL, VALID & BINDING AS THE AUTHOR WAS
ACTING FOR THE KING OF SPAIN, DETAILED EXACTING TERMS AND
EVEN DEFINED EXACTING WORDS AND INFORMED THE KING OF THIS
TREATY ENTERED WITH NATIVES AND SPAIN NEVER OBJECTED IN
ANY WAY THUS IT STOOD AND WAS HONORED AT FIRST. AS THE US

22
CANNOT POSSIBLY MAKE GOOD ON A TREATY IT INHERITS FROM
SPAIN VIA THE LA PURCHASE IF SPAIN HAS IT SITTING ON A SHELF IN
STORAGE UNKNOWN AND UNTRANSLATED IT YET STANDS AS VALID,
BINDING AND LEGAL AS WE MUST HAVE AT LEAST ONE OPPORTUNITY
TO FULFILL IT. FIRST THE PEOPLE MUST KNOW OR BE AWARE IT
EXISTS. WHEN IT WAS MADE PUBLIC? I READ IT AND REALIZED: AN
EXACT CONTRACT OR TREATY SITS WITHIN THESE NOTES! I CAN
LEGALLY ARGUE THE SOVEREIGNTY OF MYSELF & WE THE PEOPLE
BACK TO THIS TREATY THUS “VANQUISHING” THE CORPORATION US
AND THEN ACROSS THE GLOBE TO OUR COMMONLY SHARED X DNA
OR PROVE AUTHORITY IS INALIENABLE AKA AUTHORITY IS BORN OF
THE EXACTLY NAMED CREATOR. I can and will argue allodial title back to
the beginning of the universe let alone the planet. So, atheists can walk in with
nothing whatsoever to prove any of their claims and win but I can’t walk in with
proof and lose as you have predetermined that I will? What’s wrong with that
picture? What are you so fearful of? as you can be a lot of things and still act as a
federal judge but “afraid” isn’t one of them. Darwin can but I can’t? Darwin did
not account for something which became obvious to me when standing in the
National Museum of Natural History in Washington DC and confronted with a wall
sized relief of Darwin’s theory, presented as LAW. A fundamentalist standing next
to me denied scientific reality and said Darwin and people like him were going to
hell. Neither camp makes any logical sense! Neither has any proof! Then it hit me;
I thought, Spatial relationships! He or the jokers who came after him made an
English mistake! A word. They’re both right only it is not creationism but
intentionalism! I walk around the planet always thinking, with my brain in the ON
mode. Later I connected this to allodial titles and land patents (I told you my fact:
this case took YEARS to make). This is FL, and that treaty covers FL and precedes
the Treaty of Paris. St. Augustine is our nation’s oldest city and I was conceived
there. Ask my mother. In 1821 I was then “sold” when I had already been taken by
America due to Jefferson’s creative cartography, France violating a Treaty it had
with Spain and waning Spanish fortunes. All of this was illegal except Spain giving
up; Jefferson himself knew it. The Civil War barely touched FL but somebody else
did: Jackson, in 1817 seeking to illegally take FL. Jackson wrote to Monroe, “Let it
be signified to me through any channel... that the possession of the Floridas would
be desirable to the United States, and in sixty days it will be accomplished." When
the Spain demanded a “suitable punishment” for Jackson, Adams wrote back,

23
“Spain must immediately [decide] either to place a force in Florida adequate at
once to the protection of her territory...or cede to the United States a province, of
which she retains nothing but the nominal possession, but which is, in fact ... a post
of annoyance to them.” And so Spain ‘sold’ the Floridas to the US in 1821 with the
Adams-Onis Treaty. Salvation history is legal history! They are one and the same! I
knew I could establish the US’ law as elegant and the US’ sovereignty or
mankind’s sovereignty over the Earth as inalienable thus it is a case of join the US
or leave us alone as The People can no longer afford to do business with other
nations or even their own citizens who know different but choose to commit
human rights violations and worse willingly; if you are a nation or lone person who
does not help your own self? Stop asking us, The People, for our help as it is a deal
we will never, ever benefit from. Who or what turns down an opportunity to adopt
what is an elegant legal code? Actual law of this universe? Criminals, that’s who
and The People are sick and tired of it as am I as all of our tax dollars are doing is
making the situation worse across the globe and killing us as CORP US ignores the
law and ignores the federal judiciary. Women are also sick and tired of men acting
like animals and forcing it upon us. If I pay taxes I damn well better be able to
walk down any street a man can w/o being afraid. If anybody around here is going
to be afraid it is CORP US and all they associate with who are going to be afraid of
my brain. CORP US? If they do not like a federal ruling they openly disobey it or
author acts and Executive Orders meant to circumvent the judiciary thus The
People thus it often seems as if, and the lawyers deliberately make it seem as if,
federal judges are ‘owned’ by CORP US. I have a few things, facts, no judge has:
American Indian heritage along with 13 years of Catholic school and Catholics like
Jews know how to argue law and how to use words very, very creatively thus I was
taught to discern the fine differences in words as that is what Catholic Doctrine is:
The practice of rule invoked as law. The best law school in this country? Go to
Catechism class, as it seems as if whole portions of US law were taken straight
from the Baltimore Catechism, at times even word for word! Is Roberts and are 4
others Catholic? Yes, so he and four other Justices would also know it, sovereignty,
is a legal concept not exactly worded but implied or inherent. You are hit with a
wall of information that you do not process as you cannot know what you will not
allow me to tell you in person. My fact is: I looked at BVG and knew one element
was the key: Commander. I knew reasoning this case – MY CASE - to always look
for commander as at some point two paths diverged in a wood. I will be arguing
sovereignty from at least four points: 1776, 1787, 1791 and 1803. I then ague my

24
case backwards and forwards, to all points connecting it to me, the state and the
nation plus the federal judiciary. This constitutes infinity, as you cannot say at what
exact time this universe was born but only how as “infinity” or all time now is then
no time as one day is then the same as 1, 000 years if it is actual infinity. If you can
measure time in infinitely smaller amounts then how can you ever say at this exact
time? All you can state is how not when; when is then always NOW. See how and
why I stumbled upon Uniformity? This legal argument ties it all up in a bow and
connects all of the dots. It completes a circuit. And: I am a Native American not
born and raised upon a legally recognized Reservation and never applied for nor
accepted status as a citizen of a Sovereign Tribe other than Voter. I am not now and
never was a dual citizen of any kind. I did not make my Confirmation in the
Roman Catholic Institution or any Religious Institution as I refused to split my
allegiance between the Creator and myself or the Constitution versus the institution
of religion as that is rule not law and it is not science as the science would be
known as theology not religion. When told that I must split my allegiance or
commit perjury by saying I did truly believe Jesus the human is an outside
authority over me and so is The One All Male God aka I, a woman, am less than or
I could no longer live under my parent’s roof, I volunteered to move out at age 16.
I was willing to accept that negative consequence of my choice and so was willing
to defend my liberty right but was not willing to accept the consequences of lying
to God and myself and before an entire church who is the People as the ‘church’
like the government is the Living People and I am not a criminal or worse a Traitor
and I refuse to let any person turn me into one. The RCC and I both know as fact
and law the Holy Spirit is female thus God is both sexes or no sex at all as The
God is not engaging in the ACT of sex with anyone or thing but only the
QUALITY, unconditional love, but that is not taught outright so people are ‘taught’
to truly believe a lie only as they are not taught the whole truth. It is left blank, not
said, so you accidentally by design ‘insert your personal baggage here’. I know as
fact and law: Religion and faith are two different things and theology is a third
thing. My faith resides squarely in myself, God and US law. PERIOD. If I do not
ever sink to your, CORP US, level? The Creator will preserve, protect and defend
me. I reasoned my decision and made my choice: I’m A Native American who truly
believes in the exact words of US law and The Founders as well as their actions.
I’m not against religion but for theology aka law but I am against what Jesus
never said and never intended. I will not as I cannot. Upon direct confrontation
my father reasoned, “Do it as we all just did it.” I answered, “That is not a valid

25
reason and in fact it goes against everything you ever taught me. I’m Susan; I
CANNOT do that, as it is not a human ability I possess. Maybe you did and maybe
lots of people did can but I? I can’t do what you are asking so I have only one
choice: Move out. Do you even understand that you are asking me to act against
what you yourself taught me and that I know to be true about this world?” I did not
move out but I did set in motion a chain of causation that would eventually lead to
the death of my family as that one act on my part then caused every person to
examine their own actions and the lies they have been living for centuries. I’m the
sole survivor. I only wish I could say that I knew then it would undo several
centuries of abuse suffered at the hands of tyrants only some of whom were church
officials – they are royalty, slave traders and feudal land owners - in England but
mostly in Ireland and Scotland. If I had known? I would have lied during my first
confession as I did only I would have done so with a real sense of purpose and
meaning, with gusto or spirit instead of I am not a sinner and you are not going to
convince me that I am defective. This is wrong. I would have done it unafraid not
with terror in my heart but I got past that terror didn’t I? That’s: SOVEREIGNTY. I
willingly, deliberately, knowingly and intentionally chose to be and then become a
Natural Born American Citizen with a fully vested interest and right and my only
motivation was and is liberty and justice or righteousness. All pertinent fact as it
proves I know I am sovereign at least from age 8 but it was age 4 or 5. I tell
you as fact that after John Paul II contacted me and I won my case ‘against’ the
Vatican and after I was within SCOTUS I then offered France a Treaty regarding
PAST DUE WAR DEBT which We, the People are owed and even went so far as to
send it to the UN DELEGATION knowing I would be proving We, the People are
liberated thus sovereign from CORP US and the UN aka FOREIGN POWER and
FOREIGN AUTHORITY. I am so bold and ‘brazen’ as I know as fact and law my
argument is the correct one. I did not need the SCOTUS docket as proof but I went
and got it anyway. I do not recall if I sent it to France but I did fully reason my
authority and their past due debt and even calculated interest and penalties. In lieu
of actual cash or comparable goods like The Louvre? I said, “I will erase this debt
and mark it paid in full if you agree to host the currently sitting Congress forever
or until they die, whichever comes first. Once in France, as I have a plan to make
them want to go to France by way of London (GB will want to participate illegal
war and all), I will then give them the speediest, most just trial in all of US history
with the best legal representation ever, me, and convict them of treason. You then
CAN’T return Congress as you refuse to extradite, as you do not agree with our

26
death penalty that is exactly named for treason. Constitutionally? They are guilty
and my hands are tied so death it is and no extradition for Congress!” Guess what?
NO DEAL. Well, I wasn’t expecting a Treaty nor payment in full as I’m a realist. I
was out to secure proof, proof of life: Did France ever intend to pay that debt or
honor the UN Treaty? Check the facts as I still have the postal receipt or so I
believe as I have hundreds and some facts are within JPII’s autobiography so you
can actually fact check me w/o ever setting eyes on me if you are disposed to live
in denial of your own history: JPII loved America and spent time living and
working in Baltimore, as did I. He opined: As wonderful as the US is and as much
potential as it had to then secure justice upon a planetary level? It seemed America
was overly focused on lawyers and scientists – paper proof – and so had no
national identity the People rallied around like European nations did. WE had no
heart. When he contacted me? I answered: No, our spirit has been broken by
CORP US. The People are confused. I defended The People and our 1st
Amendment as it seems as if our heart is erratically and forever all over the map
because of Amendment #1 and we do indeed produce a lot of paper. We even call it
a “paper chase”. But unlike 99.9% of Americans I know the real, actual reason the
kids in the movie wanted to be in Prof. Kingsfield’s contract law class:
SOVEREIGNTY, as the two governing documents are signed, federal contracts.
Contract law then is a doorway, one We first deliberately walked through in Eden.
Sovereignty, as I did not ask The People for their permission as that is not our law
thus ACTED as an AGENT of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT as my legal
standing made me the authority with the power to act on The People’s behalf. Not
only was the UN/IMF Treaty no good but the UN member nations never had any
intention of fulfilling the contract as France proved and it is an impossible standard
The People must meet for how can any member nation fulfill that Treaty if its law
is unjust and if its government contains the will and liberty of its people? It cannot;
it is impossible to then fulfill the Treaty with CORP US even if CORP US was
legal and places The People in the position of FOREVER BEING IN THE RED
OR DEBT; IT MAKES THE INJURY PERMANENT AND WILL BE OUR
DEATH AS A JUST GOVERNMENT AND EVENTUALLY THE PHYSICAL
NATION WILL BE NO MORE. Living constitutions cannot do business with dead
institutions; it does not work – ever. JOHN ROBERTS OR HIS AGENT
UPHELD MY CLAIM OF SOVEREIGNTY IN ALL WAYS VIA HIS 11/20/08
ACTION BASED UPON THIS VERY EVIDENCE AND MY LOGICAL,
HISTORICAL AND SCIENTIFIC REASONING. I NAMED ALL OF THIS

27
AND REASONED THE LAW I DEFINED AND INCLUDED EVIDENCE
RISING TO PROOF NO SANE, EMOTIONALLY HEALTHY PERSON
COULD DENY. I HAVE MY OWN UNIQUE WAY OF REASONING LAW
BUT IT WORKS EVERY TIME AND CONSTITUTES GENIUS AS GENIUS
IS SEEING A PROBLEM IN A WHOLE NEW WAY THUS DISCOVERING
AN ANSWER THAT HAS ELUDED US. NOBODY ELSE WOULD
CONTACT THE UN’S FRENCH DELEGATION BUT I, SUSAN, WOULD
AND DID. Who’s afraid of France’s opinion? They owe me and big time. France
probably read my letter and Treaty and laughed. Who’s laughing now? I first
entered this argument and this evidence rising to proof including the most of the
science and then the proof itself – I, Susan, acting pro se - to the Middle District Of
FL Federal Court on April 4th, 2007. NY, PA & PARTS OF FL (you must consider
that Spanish contract) THAT WE LEGALLY TOOK POSSESSION OF ARE
STATES, SOVEREIGN STATES WITHIN A SOVEREIGN NATION. ALL
CITIZENS ARE SOVEREIGN OR WE EACH POSSES CONSTITUTIONAL
AUTHORITY OVER OUR OWN PERSONS. I ENTERED THOSE STATE
CONSTITUTIONS TO THE FEDERAL COURT IN THEIR ENTIRETY PLUS
MY OWN TESTIMONY OF BEING EFFECTED BY THE UN AS A RESIDENT
OF NY. LAST TIME I FACT CHECKED? WASHINGTON DC IS NOT A STATE
BUT IS THE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS OR SEAT OF THE
CORPORATION NOT THE SEAT OF THE LEGAL, CONSTITUTIONAL
GOVERNMENT (THAT LEGAL, ORIGINAL SEAT WOULD BE WHEREVER I
AM AS I LEGALLY SIT IN SCOTUS NOW HAVING ENTERED DIRECTLY
UPON AN CLAIM OF O.J. THUS NEPTUNE BEACH, FL IS NOW THE SEAT OF
US SOVEREIGNTY AS EXACTLY NAMED WITHIN OUR CONSTITUTION AND
MARBURY AS NB, FL IS MY ACTUAL ADDRESS AND I SWEAR: I’M HERE). I
WENT SO FAR AS TO EXACTLY NAME THE HONOR BOUND
AGREEMENT BETWEEN WASHINGTON, HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON
THAT CREATED DC AS THEY NEVER INTENDED FOR US, WE THE
PEOPLE, TO BECOME A PRIVATE AND FOREIGN CONTROLLED
COMMODITY NOR A PUBLICLY TRADED ONE. THEY DID NOT SELL US
INTO SLAVERY AND/OR HUMAN BONDAGE BUT LIBERATED US. DC
RATIFIED NOTHING IN OUR GOVERNING DOCUMENTS. DC IS A
NECESSARY ‘CORRUPTION’, A LEGAL ENTITY WE NEEDED AFTER THE
FACT TO THEN AVOID CONFLICT BUT IT SEEMS AS IF WE CREATED A
WORSE CONFLICT: VOTING RIGHTS OF CITIZENS IN THE DISTRICT OF

28
COLUMBIA: “differ from those of United States citizens in each of the 50 states.
D.C. residents do not have voting representation in the United States Senate and
only a delegate in the House of Representatives, but D.C. is entitled to three
electoral votes for President. The United States Constitution grants
congressional voting representation to the states, which the District is not. The
District is a federal territory ultimately under the complete authority of Congress.”
A CONFLICT, as you must go back to the word “organic” in the “The District of
Columbia Organic Act of 1871” as it is organic to the CORP US, INBORN TO
OR OF CORP US; OR MATERIALLY (legally) INSEPARABLE, and not We The
People; it is not organic to the Constitution whatsoever. There is no relation. It’s
also not organic to the 1808 creation or incorporation of the municipal authority. It
MUST be the CORP US not The People no matter how it is worded as it is
redundant and unnecessary otherwise and goes against everything our Founders
ever said they truly believed and then proved via living it out as real. It makes no
logical or rational sense if you attempt to assign it any other legal status than being
the CORP US not We The People us with a small ‘u’ but it reads it is organic
exactly thus openly admits to being CORP US not The People. A CONFLICT
WASHINGTON, HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON NEVER, EVER INTENDED
FOR US AS DC BECAME A DIVIDED INTEREST BETWEEN CORP. US
VERSUS WE THE PEOPLE. [A corruption of US law is not necessarily itself
corrupt because of the due process clauses and our living nature or DC is as it
acts.] I NAMED ALL OF THIS EXACTLY, EXCEPTING SOME EXACT
DATES OR ENTERED IT AS AN ATTACHMENT IN THE FORM OF AN
ARTICLE, PAGE FROM A BOOK OF HISTORY, PHOTOGRAPH OR 1st
PERSON EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY ETC. AS I HAVE VISITED THE
CORPORATE SEAT MY OWN SELF! I WAS DELIBERATELY SETTING UP
THE FRAME WORK FOR MY EVENTUAL SCOTUS WIN, A LEGAL
VICTORY THAT IS ALREADY, AS I EXACTLY STATED “THIS IS A CASE OF
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION THAT CAN ONLY BE ADJUDICATED IN
SCOTUS.”

2. I stated this is a case of original jurisdiction over and over and each time the
judiciary reasoned and decided cases of o.j. are or are not only as they say so in
spite of actual reality, my faultless reasoning and US law. THEN THE JAX
FEDERAL COURT ARBITRARILY FILED SOME ATTACHMENTS BUT NOT
OTHERS. LATER IT, A SPECIFIC CLERK I FOUGHT WITH FROM DAY ONE

29
MINUTE ONE and who was the same clerk present when I appeared in person in
the clerk’s office in an attempt to secure these documents and who, on 4/4/07
correctly ‘predicted’ that if I disobeyed and filed them then I would never receive a
copy but used MONEY as the reason as in ‘you will never be able to pay our
asking price as you’re poor’, AND THEN THE BENCH ITSELF, REFUSED TO
COPY THOSE IT DID NOT SCAN THUS THEY WERE NOT EVEN
AVAILABLE ON PACER. EVEN WHEN I APPEARED IN PERSON I DID NOT
MANAGE TO GET A COPY OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROOF DUE TO
THAT CLERK’S ACTIONS. 1st CLASS MAIL? THEY WROTE BACK ACTING
AS IF I NEVER ASKED FOR A COPY OR AS IF THEY COULD NOT
UNDERSTAND A SIMPLE REQUEST. AS FOR PRICE? I HAVE BEEN
QUOTED 3 or 4 PRICES AND 1 OF THOSE IS IN WRITING; WHEN I SAID
I’LL PAY ANY AMOUNT OF DOLLARS YOU NAME fully knowing they are
worthless? SUDDENLY THE POST OFFICE NOT THE LEGISLATURE IS A
GREEDY, IMPETUOUS VORTEX or so the clerks claim SO MY REQUESTS
DISAPPEAR. The attachment entered April 4th, 2007 under the name “Susan” only
contains the entire paper trail, all the way back to Common X and then even
further back into time. If atheists and criminals are going to make me take the legal
argument to the beginning of this universe? LET’S GO. It includes the $1 dollar
deed for the house with $30 k mortgage that same day which I and my children
were exchanged for, the 1st Women’s Rights conference held at Seneca Falls NY in
1840, all known strands of our human DNA & the entire Iroquois Constitution as
well as some of my academic records to demonstrate I do indeed have the ability to
bring a complex federal case forth and hammer it out of the ballpark on behalf of
myself & The People. I left no stone unturned, as I was not bout to give CORP US
a means to defeat a just judge or The People only as I forgot something or my work
is sloppy; it only appears to be sloppy, lol. I was considering the judge’s duties as
lawyers told me of their stunts when before courts and I knew I’d be up against
whole firms. I completely and wholly or fully understood the challenge I was
taking on as I am not a naive little girl fresh out of grade school and I have news
for you – I was not so naive then either; I, Susan, have been around blocks you
would never even imagine existed. Sometimes a tragic, violent life is an advantage
as I have already defeated some of the most evil, vile persons you will ever come
across so licensed lawyers do not frighten me nor do judges as the judge is
supposed to be on the side of The Constitution, a document I can argue upside
down, inside out and sideways. A judge isn’t supposed to act for the criminal

30
element. If he or she does? We do not bother asking why as the legal presumption
is you knew as you’re an expert but did it regardless. I stated that I could cite US
case law and gave this court a reference: Will, the SCOTUS clerk, as although
nobody meant to do it as we argued US case law that day in February of 2007 and
he hung up in exasperation when I won? I ENTERED MY FACTS, MY
FEDERAL QUESTIONS & MY ARGUMENT OVER THE PHONE AND WON
THAT DAY AS HE ASKED ME TO QUALIFY MYSELF IN VIOLATION OF
THE LAW AND FL’S SUNSHINE LAW & ACCIDENTALLY ATTEMPTED TO
ADJUDICATE IT! We argued my case that day and I won thus all I ever had to do
was place it on paper. John Roberts is well aware of this and has known of this
since at least March or April of 2008 as have all of the Justices or they should
know, as I was conferenced. It is fate! WHO in all of history phoned in their
SCOTUS case and argument and then won? Most people have to appear in person,
as they do not have airtight cases. The lawyers appearing are nervous not confident
as they aren’t so certain their argument is correct. Scalia said they do not even look
him in the eye. See Scalia’s 60Minutes interview. What litigant would not be
confident if these are her facts? I intended to ask for the rules and if there is a
different process for filing cases of original jurisdiction and did but we ended up
accidentally arguing my case as I am the first nonlawyer able to do such a thing
spontaneously; I am the first nonlawyer able to answer the questions Justices might
ask. AGAIN: It is because I see problems in their entirety and then go back and
pick out the absolutes you do not know as I know them; I process complex
concepts and whole groups of complex concepts differently than any other person
on Earth as it is a gift I was born with or IT’S ORGANIC TO SUSAN. You make
my job ten times harder as I must figure out what you do not know on paper, as
you will not tell me in person. I refuse to believe you have never, ever read either
governing document but only the court rules or that you truly believe your actions
and your own job is moot. That’s just silly! It’s legal poppycock! See several
SCOTUS cases and Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe, in a letter to Rep. John
Conyers (D-MI), on the Bush administration's claim that the U.S. Constitution
authorizes the domestic eavesdropping program: “The technical legal term for
that, I believe, is poppycock.” Anyway: That’s how I resolved Uniformity or united
Relativity and Quantum Mechanics – as I was able to see this legal issue very, very
differently than a lawyer would as lawyers are trained to think in absolutes or finite
terms and do not know physics or God (most of them anyway or so it seems) and
as I had to be more thorough than anyone else ever. The appearance of it all is

31
deceiving, isn’t it? Einstein gave me a clue: when I noticed everything about us
seemed to be false and an appearance only I recalled that Einstein never, ever came
to believe Neils Bohr’s Copenhagen Model. Experiments appeared to prove Bohr
correct and Einstein seemed to have acquiesced but in reality? Einstein went to his
grave insisting what we saw in the lab was a deceptive appearance and that our
assumptions based upon that appearance HAD TO BE INCORRECT. Not maybe
but HAD TO BE INCORRECT. He said, You can never, ever author a theory re a
law based upon what you observe and then use the very same observations to
prove your theory! Your observations do not prove your theory is law as you must
predict what we do not know and then based upon your theory watch to see if your
theory is correct or incorrect but all these guys were doing is observing phenomena
and then claiming it is proof! How is it proof if you SEE IT FIRST and THEN GO
BACK AND MAKE UP A LAW??? If you cater your theory or your law to then fit
what you just saw??? That’s not proof! I thought, Predetermined judicial fate!
Law that assumes a legal entity or legal power exists when it does not!!! Like the
discrimination of women and no law license presupposes I am defective and not
able or capable!!! Like falsified orders that then force my legal complaint to fit the
order not the order fitting my complaint or argument!!! The order has to match my
complaint, the Constitution, US case law and the line of reasoning must be w/o
fault or at least existent; you may not change my complaint to then fit your ruder
within the order itself! AHA! It is garbage that in no way matches actual
reality...which means: as it is a chain all I have to is locate the missing link, that
one paper or person that then unites or proves it is all a lie and a crime against me
but first We The People that ballooned to unbelievable proportions as it went
ignored and as I pursued my case all the way to SCOTUS. I was not so stupid as to
tell everything I knew as I’m not the threat but I know the false perception is that I
am. I’m not to be faulted if YOU, the sitting federal judiciary, were duped by
CORP US and the false appearances so now make justice impossible thus aid and
abet the crooks knowingly and unknowingly, whether you meant to or not. The
Founders said: NEVER let your guard down for a single second. They also said
master every discipline you can as you’re gonna need it to fight the lawyers.
Jefferson despised lawyers for a reason. Actual law as written in 1776 and 1787
and US case law? Put up or shut up as in cease and desist writing words you can
never support in any actual, legal court of law like SCOTUS and that only serve to
prove your own guilt as your words – your work – self-evince or prove you to be
repugnant thus your [this] order is void; stop lowering yourself to the same level as

32
the crooks as you are federal judges: “the Constitution's written nature, and the
formal enumeration of the powers of government would be empty promises if
there were no means to measure the actions of the government against the
Constitution, and strike down those found wanting (see Marbury V Madison,
supra, at 177) "[c]ertainly all those who have framed written constitutions
contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation,
and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of
the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void’”. RULE is never an
acceptable authority! If you wrote, “We will not hear this case as we
personally despise Susan” that’s an actual reason and proves you’re fit as you
can reason. To write what you wrote? You do not know: It constitutes a hate
crime. It’s paper proof genocide is already in progress. If you’re a woman, an
ethical citizen, natural born, believe in the exactly named Creator but not the
vengeful, hateful, bloody, fear mongering, small time God of most religions, or
intelligent - look out as you’re on CORP US hit list! As the order is void then
you are null and void. You and your work, this order, is repugnant. It is my
protected, fully vested and exactly worded right to abolish and dissolve you and
your work, the insufferable and unjust form. Abolishing and dissolving the order is
frivolous or manifestly futile as you then would only issue more repugnant orders.
Federalist 10 instructs me to attack and address the cause if possible. This bench,
now seemingly a part of CORP. US is the cause as it acted against The People. The
bench has no will and liberty but the persons sitting on it do thus I must attack and
abolish you not the actual wooden bench, gavel, robe, desk or paper. If you feel
stupid? That’s because the Jax bench made you look stupid via their criminal
actions. I put it in writing and then went to the courthouse and said it in person:
You are obstructing justice. You are deliberately preventing John Roberts from
executing his duties and preventing any other judge from doing the same. I named
the criminal acts. You are knowingly, willingly and deliberately – intentionally –
doing everything you can to keep the ugly truth of your own actions secret.
Knowing they set out to give you, this bench, what constitutes falsified evidence -
those manufactured orders – that do not match anything at all but the legal
definition of exact criminal acts and to strip you of proof by pulling a complaint
and by refusing to scan or copy the most crucial evidence– as we all knew as long
as I never appeared in person they could DENY knowledge of me (Incorrect! But
that’s what they truly believed). I wrote all of this down exactly. I, Susan, pulled a
play from my own book and so went AROUND them to SCOTUS fully knowing

33
YOU fell in between. My action granted you immunity as I HAD ZERO
CONTACT WITH YOU THUS WHEN THE CRIMES ARE EXPOSED? YOU
WOULD NOT BE IN THE CHAIN. It couldn’t be you, the 11th District Appellate.
We never even met on paper! I knew I might have to come back here to then make
Roberts a pro se litigant against CORP US. To prove it is endemic? You then go to
the one place you have never been. I acted to give this bench protection of the law
as I do not in any way allow innocent people to be injured by crooks. If I know as
fact any person is acting to ‘pass the blame’ ahead to another bench that so far has
done nothing and that does not even know I exist, do I dirty my hands or to I report
it to an actual authority that then can act for The People as it is not Susan V The
11th District Appellate as this bench seems to believe it is? Go to an authority to set
up the framework for my eventual physical victory as legally it is assured. When
you act as you did towards any litigant most especially those made vulnerable or
already grossly injured you only harm your own self first. You suffer the injury
then, not me. You are choosing to play that vile game and to corrupt our law not
me. The effect will always and forever be your own self suffering harm as I made it
into SCOTUS, forced action and kept acting unlike Marbury. Any time you act
against the law you only harm your own self first as you take a chink out of
yourself; you keep doing and doing it so that the kid stealing a pack of gum today
is knocking over a bank tomorrow. Punitive damages are supposed to prevent
CORP US from knocking over banks but now they do not care about money, as
they like me know it is worthless but instead ‘care’ about their wicked, depraved
and malicious ideas of perceived power and control and how to keep perpetrating
them upon us mostly in secret and behind closed doors. Can anybody say the
Rockefeller founded COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS? If you believe your
vote has actual legal power you are a fool. But if CORP US believes they have
actual power over us they are fools as how do they then reason me away? Once I
saw Paris you couldn’t keep me down on the pig farm. I did not want to be French
or Parisian but I certainly did not want to wallow with the pigs either. So I told the
truth: You’re wallowing with pigs and do not know it. IF YOU DENY THE
TRUTH – MY FACT, US FACT AND US LAW OR HISTORY - OR ACT
AGAINST ROBERTS YOU ARE MAKING ONE OF THREE CLAIMS: 1, YOU
ARE GUILTY. 2, YOU ARE UNFIT (WHY MATTERS NOT) OR 3. YOU DO
NOT KNOW SOMETHING. IT’S THE LAST ONE, #3. So then: TeamLaw,
Melvindaleonline and Susan are correct regarding the above facts , reasoning and
application one of which is UNDENIABLE AS MATH IS AN INVIOLATE LAW:

34
the five month disparity between the signing of the Treaty and the Act itself as you
cannot ENACT what does not yet exist! Math in SCOTUS? In SCOTUS, if it is a
Presidential election, it may be per curiam ONLY if it truly is in our best interests
but if it is? It then must be 9 as 1 or 9 5-4 as 2 thus SCOTUS acting as 1 FOR The
People thus FOR the Constitution! Those exact words “per curiam” should not fool
anybody most especially currently sitting federal judges, as you know what per
curiam actually means and is. You may not have known the real reason why
SCOTUS never, ever uses it but now you do as I told you. Math in my life? MAY
99 comes before JULY 99 as does DECEMBER 08. Personally opine all you wish;
you can never reason those disparities away. If Bush is installed there is NO
PRESIDENT OF THE US; if Obama installs himself with the help of CORP US?
There is NO COMMANDER OF THE US. If I slowly and carefully make this case
and file it as a pro se woman who is born into the injury known as patriarchy that
then became criminal in nature 200 years later? There’s no CORP US only We The
People as named in the Declaration and only We The People as named in our
Constitution with me as its President and Commander. If there is no legally
recognized UN then there is no act naming the UN as it is not a legal entity or legal
authority yet, it’s there in NYC but not written law yet, thus we cannot enact and
engage in what is not legal and then sign the Treaty ex post facto. Action follows
the idea or thought. 1st you recognize it and then you create legislation re it. If you
create the legislation first? It’s like Congress creating an amendment to then have
the power to DISCUSS how and where Senators are elected and then, upon that
discussion, creating more amendments about how and where Senators are actually
elected. Think: Men congress; they discuss and debate. If you need an amendment
to congress and your name happens to be Congress and that word is in both
governing documents already??? You are no longer a Constitutional Republic as
you’re changing the very fabric of our Constitution!!! I smell a rat and how.
Einstein would roll over in his grave! It constitutes actual ex post facto law –
unfounding your Republic or turning it into something else like an oligarchy - or it
constitutes pre facto law, anticipatory but which might never come to be real law, a
done deal w/o any representation, but however you choose to count it the math as
well as the reasoning and application is bad, very bad. See the FCC enacting policy
as law but then holding public hearings as if the policy and then the application of
the law is still a matter of debate when it is not. This is not actual, legal
constitutional representation; it is not a government of living people! Jefferson
believed Marbury was a solid legal decision but warned: due to the nature of man

35
it had the POTENTIAL to result in an oligarchy; he warned us it is not SCOTUS or
any institution it is the men within the offices but SCOTUS and the Office of Chief
Justice is an animal you MUST be always aware of – ALWAYS AND FOREVER-
as if overthrow happens? It’ll come out of there or enter there. Yes, as that’s chain
of command theory. As ours is never ending? SCOTUS is the flash point as
Marbury V Madison set it! What’s brighter than the flare known as BVG? It will be
o.j., Commander and SCOTUS as it cannot be anything else as reason and logic
dictate: No other people have the right to bear arms so they can shoot back in the
event of a violent military coup. That’s the actual reason or intention behind our
2nd Amendment as it can happen and did: I am a well regulated militia of one,
charged with the duty to defend myself and those more vulnerable or even
defenseless in the event of a coup or other national emergency like a foreign
invasion be it an actual foreign army or on paper only – “made legal” when it is
not! Done in ‘secret’ before we had some forms of mass media thus forced upon
The People, without their knowledge or consent. Rehnquist jumped up and down -
all over the paper, lol. With his ethic he said LOOK HERE! IT’S THIS! IT’S ONE
NOT MANY! So I did look. To me it was obvious. Then, Stevens said, It’s this exact
thing: LAWYERS!!! Trying to escape The People of FL or FL’s judiciary. He said
judiciary not People but I know what it means to run from court to court as it was
done to my kids and me and as I know US law, the principles at work. People do
this stuff not paper! And there are no accidents of math – ever! Numbers by
themselves do not have accidents and do not make mistakes as they have no
conscious awareness; they need the aid and assistance of people for that to
happen. According to these people we have had about 50 accidents of math. That
might be possible in another universe but not in this one. Lawyers, hired guns out
to kill me by killing the Constitution that my dime pays, lying to my face. And
Bush Jr. isn’t a lawyer, not even in theory according to CORP US. A clue, as Bush
unlike Gore is ex-military.

3. If you wholly disregard the 5 month disparity the UN still is not legal as the US
has refused to sign its human rights Charter or Treaty and the only reason for that?
Past administrations some of who are unjust persons within those administrations
have openly stated it is because of WOMEN AS THE EQUALS OF MEN clauses
thus the US will not sign that Charter or Treaty and so CORP US does not practice
its own exactly written law! “Authorities” then admit or openly confess the US as
a living Government of People exists in theory only not in practice! They are

36
claiming that a living government is not our law! A Living Government of People
is our law and it is intrinsic to our law. It is also actual reality as in no people? No
CORP US let alone Government of People. Who or what would you be trading and
violating if you had no living people? The ‘authorities’ admit they act upon and for
the Corporation US but not upon and for WE, the People. And it’s reasoning?
Fatally flawed as equal protection is a law of this universe thus these MEN as the
corporate authority, the Office of the Executive, is exclusively male and unjustly so
is openly and actively injuring me only for woman and w/o any legal named
reasoning or cause as the one it names is wholly manufactured as it is not about
sovereignty of the US but is about men controlling women and children, or, buying
and selling their persons. If all children male and female are bought and sold then
YOU are bought and sold. The only legal and logical conclusion based upon the
actual facts or actual reality, as it is now not as you personally want it to be to then
avoid this case, US law, exact words and good or correct math as well as science
and US case law is: I’m the acting, legal President and Commander of original
jurisdiction and upon my appearance in person in SCOTUS I then make John
Roberts the acting, legal Chief Justice of original jurisdiction as well as the
currently sitting Justices legal as SCOTUS is the lone institution besides
myself that has not been corrupted or has been consistently self-correcting
aka self-adjudicating thus is still in line, LAWFUL, or exists as intended as
written by its creators: The Original Founders including Marshall (all of
them) and our Creator aka what came before the Declaration and
Constitution. See “A Summary View On The Rights Of British America” by
Jefferson. I knew as fact to prove WE are a living government and those women
have been violated wholly I had to author a SCOTUS authority case of o.j. pro se
as all lawyers have unclean hands and if I did not author my own case who then
did? It constitutes 1st person eyewitness testimony and so it is to be accepted as
absolute fact and truth unless you can cast doubt upon me that I cannot then reason
for you. Thus far? You have resorted to perjury as that doubt is nonexistent, once
again as supported or proven by Roberts action on 11/20/08. If you read the same
complaints and petitions supported by the same evidence Roberts did then how in
the world did you ever have to come to own such a diametrically opposing
viewpoint in regards to American history and US law than the sitting Chief Justice?
You had more evidence in support of my claim and you had something Roberts did
not have: My brief. How does Roberts possess actual faith in himself, God and US
law while you seem to possess none whatsoever and seem to think US law is

37
matter of your personal belief or that it only exists if you say so? That idea has a
name: It is known as the Biocentric Model of the universe and it was mostly
authored by avowed atheists who routinely violate the ethic of the People found
within the Declaration and Constitution. These ‘scientists’ espouse the belief, and
this is the exact words of one of them, that “Let’s face it. Once you turn your back
on the moon? It ceases to exist.” No, US law and the government of The People
only ceases to exist if you turn your back on it and then come to TRULY
BELIEVE you are The Creator and so have the power to destroy what is
inalienable. LIABILITY forces you to answer to the Creator and to your victim: I,
Susan. Ideally you want to unseat the crooks as they came to exist now (but not
necessarily as they were born or as they were when first they sat) and then reseat
them with ethical and moral persons. Or you need all currently sitting officers to be
accountable and responsible and then act to fulfill their duties under our law in
both letter and spirit and this must then begin at the top, Executive, and then at the
bottom, lone citizen or voter. You do not want two governments; you do not want a
shadow one that is not what was intended or one split in two with divided interests
and you do not want foreigners or crooks running this nation and killing We the
People spiritually and/or physically. It is highly unlikely any people currently
sitting will volunteer to submit to the authority of the Constitution any time soon as
every time they are to do so they blatantly refuse and then add new injury to old
insult by telling the People in no uncertain circumstances that they, not the
Constitution and not the lawful government of People, have all of the power as no
judge is willing to obey the law either thus stop them. These unjust men brag
openly about their ability to exploit the law thus the People. They brag openly that
judges are in their pockets as if they do not actually buy them with money or favor
they then use fear as their currency. It is on the evening news every day; it is in all
the papers and as I lived in Baltimore, MD? I myself, with my own ears, have
heard them brag. At a political rally in FL? I, my own self, with my own ears,
heard them brag and witnessed them violate exactly named, fully vested, protected
rights and even target defenseless women. At this rally? A private person who is an
agent of the Republican Party acting as if he was a military power authorized as
such by the law and so by the People attempted to rough me up and got the surprise
of his life: I said NO and exactly told him that I knew what was actually ‘going on’
and that if he wanted to go to jail it was his choice as first I’d sue him civilly to
then force a criminal trial as that is how you inform the People. I told him, “I will
be seeing you in SCOTUS.” Did I lie or did I then go do it? I am as I act. I

38
unincorporated us by dissolving all kinds of personal, mistaken and at times false
belief and the ‘inserted’ or entrenched corruption of the law thus liability does
indeed ensue as you knew as I told you. Some of it was legal at the time, it seemed
to be then and did work then but now it does not, and some of it never was legal
and so is not now legal. Legally you never were incorporated and me? I never
agreed. Then whatever that thing was that you referred to as a just government?
Even you, the US in the form of the Solicitor General, defaulted on 11/05/08 after I
informed it of the fact and law plus the correct application of US law to all persons
across the board. Even you, the CORP US, could not stand that ugly, clumsy thing
you only called a government of the People when it is not. Is a federal judiciary
beholden to CORP US, deriving its power from the Corporation and not the
People, even remotely constitutional? No and even Hamilton would balk at that
idea. Hamilton’s idea is that money can often buy the requisite education or can
accord you necessary life experience poverty might not as people who overcome
gross adversity via extraordinary effort are few and far between. Hamilton never
intended for a strong federal Corporation at the very extinction of the People! He
intended to create a centralized government of People not a corporate trust or a
privately funded trust; Hamilton as a private citizen and as an officer? One and the
same thus there is no conflict. Hamilton, Adams and Marshall never once named
this thing we are today. What is my proof? LIFE: I can read Marbury and in
Marshall’s own hand plus when this idea first came close to being realized?
Hamilton voted for Jefferson to defeat Burr legally and then placed himself
between Burr and the People thus took an actual bullet for us to defeat Burr
physically. Upon reading what original jurisdiction actually is and means you must
reverse or overturn your own ruling or when I do eventually win - physically win
as legally it has happened or is done – either in a court or in real life as the People
finally suffer so much they are moved to support my Presidency and with violence
if your unconstitutional actions make that necessary? You set yourself up for death
as you incited that violence and as the Fifth Amendment says WE do not need to
convene a grand jury in this case to then charge, try and convict you thus hang you.
You were to command, no? YES, AND IN TIME OF ACTUAL WAR. I am a keen
observer and I have keenly and wisely observed you named no actual, legal reason
for abandoning your command. NOTHING AT ALL. You said it is DISMISSED
and MOOT but not WHY. You did exactly quote Rule not law or case law “42-4”, a
rule not written by a Founder and in a spirit SCOTUS has in the past thrown out as
a form of discrimination and that I named as a form of evidence tampering as it is a

39
deliberate manipulation or manufacturing of the evidence JOHN ROBERTS and so
SCOTUS will eventually see, hear, feel and weigh, citing the governing documents
are "ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT" meaning you looked right at the SCOTUS
docket, my person, a quote by Ben Franklin, American history books, Obama and
even the UN in NYC - all of which is a product of the two US governing
documents so they must have some merit - but then DENIED and
DISMISSED it all or CONFESSED TO YOUR GUILT IN WRITING! You don’t
want to do that! You are saying that WE, the people aka the Constitution is entirely
without merit and that my birth is without merit for if the Revolution was never
fought and I was never born in America naturally? I never would have entered
SCOTUS, the US never would have defaulted on 11/05/08 and Roberts never
would have acted on 11/20/08. Are you serious? Do you truly believe WE are this
silly or that we would ever come to believe the Revolution was not fought? Or that
Obama/Biden is legal? Are you are claiming Roberts himself and his action is w/o
merit? That he too is ‘crazy’ and cannot read? That like you some disembodied
being put a pen in his hand and a gun to his head and forced him to write
"DENIED" any and all protection of the law? You made a mistake: Roberts never
said any such thing. The appearance of the paper and computer generated docket
only makes it seem as if. You, unlike he, wrote "MOOT". Exactly! YES, I AGREE
AS WE ALL DO: THE DECLARATION AND CONSTITUTION IS NOW
MOOT AS OFFICERS LIKE YOU RENDER IT MOOT VIA YOUR
ACTIONS THUS I WIN AGAIN AS YOU CONCURRED! YOU’RE MY
PROOF OF DEATH. Ideally you want to be proof of life or constitutional. You,
an other federal court do not have John Roberts’ reason; you are not acting as John
Marshall as he is. You do have another choice that is now available as Roberts and
I provided it; we created the opportunity for you. My true belief is: This court
means to place the burden of petitioning SCOTUS on me and is confident it can
escape liability by claiming it acted and only failing to act is a crime. Not in this
instance. You’re supposed to truly believe my testimony and Roberts (SCOTUS)
action in support of it. We’re US law or The People. But how do you know as
absolute fact? SUSAN STICKS OUT LIKE A SORE THUMB AS NO LAW
LICENSE. If the profession is endemically corrupted? The only standard you have
is a nonlawyer and Supreme Court Justice or any Supreme Court employee as they
have a chinese wall around them and as they tell the truth of who and what they are
all over the paper they produce and make public. It’s a permanent record. A
worldwide permanent record. If they act? A litigant had to move them with fact

40
and law. With REASONING.

4. I have a volunteer (in fact I have several). It was not humanly possible for him to
act before he read my brief as SCOTUS denied him informed consent thus now he
can and may. Upon re-entry to SCOTUS? He or any willing volunteer then joins
my case thus appearing in the caption. That makes him Vice President. He's a voter
acting in his official capacity as a voter as well as an individual. If he chooses not
to continue? Next person to get to me and volunteer wins IF they name their case
and so every element. Upon our win he then gets his name on the ballot for
President in 2012 as a candidate independent from me or in his own right. This
then makes us a brand new case of original jurisdiction. Thus, you want to
reconsider. Thousands maybe millions of people know my case. Why don’t you?
Media blackout as CORP US owns most all of it. The FCC allowed a monopoly of
the unethical and immoral to form. The FCC aided and abetted it as guess who’s in
charge of the FCC these days? CORP US family and friends, that’s who. See
Michael K. Powell was nominated by President William J. Clinton to a Republican
seat on the Commission, and was sworn in on November 3, 1997. He was
designated chairman by President George W. Bush on January 22, 2001, and
served until March 17, 2005. Like I’m to truly believe Colin Powell’s son is some
super genius communications law expert? The best our nation has? My fact: I
happen to have a relationship with that guy, I mean I know him (in the past it was a
physical relationship): His FCC argument won in SCOTUS. In a few years he had
3 cases go to SCOTUS. He might also have the Mexican government where we
want it due to an intellectual property case he might be able to bring again with my
help. Check the fact: look up a case out of LA over a 1st Amendment question: May
gambling casinos advertise? His boss argued it in person but it is his case and his
argument. His work. Why Michael Powell and not him? We all know why; stop
treating The People as if we are morons. It is the ethical pitted against the
unethical. I’m not against nepotism. I’m against lying and calling it hard work. All
Obama lawsuits, not merely my own, are ‘conveniently’ being ignored by the
media as the federal bench is making it easy for the crooks some of whom are
‘reporters’. The People have been using alternate media sources. It’s like
pamphleteering all over again only it’s electronic. Now, you know as fact and law
that you do not – NOT – have the power or authority to overturn an action of John
Roberts, your Chief Justice, as you did not object to his appointment or his actions
prior to my appeal without a hearing in person. John Roberts does not have the

41
right to defend himself against the charges? I exactly named them. Is this bench
now claiming that it does possess constitutional authority over the People and over
the Chief Justice? This order constitutes this bench making the claim that Roberts
action is unconstitutional and is “entirely without merit” thus the action and the
man who did it, Roberts, is dismissed and moot or is void, not the office of Chief
Justice. Like I told the Secret Service: legally we can argue this point as I claimed
you’re correct, as his appointment was not arbitrary. See? You may even win. How
and why are we still arguing against each other if we have agreed on at least three
points of law so far? Entirely without merit is another way to say the word
repugnant. Are you certain you want to make this claim before SCOTUS and so
the People? As logically this then means you are ordering that the People are
repugnant thus void and so CORP US is now a made legal or legally enforced
oligarchy. Do you now understand how and why this order is you committing
treason?

5. You may not issue an ORDER that applies to me uniquely as a 20 page limit
does based upon my unique facts which you yourself read thus own or issue an
order that instructs a clerk to commit what is a violation of the Constitution and is
a criminal act known as treason. You knew as hardcore fact that such an order is
not constitutional but went and did it anyway. I exactly named this exact action
with exact words thus you read my motion and my brief as well as Marbury so
owned this knowledge, that it is unconstitutional and a violation of my fully
vested, protected rights as well as an overturning of past federal precedent set by
SCOTUS aka US case law, but then acted to do it. This is not so complex; it is
basic reasoning you learn as a child not in law school. Science says that you own a
conscience at about age 4; my own life proves this is a fact as at age 4 I owned the
knowledge of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ or ‘ability’ versus ‘capacity’. If you were not
raised to know? It’s a law of human psychology: Children who have no conscience
grow up to be actual psychopaths and so are, for the most part, confined to jail and
insane asylums as actual psychopaths do not fear being caught thus act in the open.
If you are one who has not been caught yet? Law school and then life taught you,
as you are a FEDERAL judge not a state judge. You would not exist if not for the
federal interpretation and concept of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ known as Marbury, as if
not for Marbury? No constitutional authority as an institution. No redress.
Marbury then led to all of it, and to USC 1331. Marbury birthed you, as you
exist today, as did both governing documents. Marbury is you, applies to you

42
and makes it possible for the people to then empower you. You cannot be
separated from Marbury. If you do separate yourself from Marbury? Then you
have no basis to then answer any federal questions thus have no authority
whatsoever over the People as the authority named in the constitution belongs to
the lone citizen only. Our founders left it for WE, the People, to decide; they not
once named any power over us that then GAVE the People power; they said the
exact opposite or WE give power to you. Logically then WE already own power
and authority as symbolized by our one vote. You do not decide if or how I vote. I
voted against you and any person aligned with CORP US by entering SCOTUS
directly. John Roberts upheld my vote as legal. It counts and it is one of only two
of all cast that are legal. If it was not? Roberts would never ever have acted on
11/20/08. Legally he or his agent could not have acted, as they may not. Marbury
V Madison clearly states all people are each accountable and responsible thus if
that order is obeyed in open and direct violation of the letter of the law and/or its
spirit and which is itself in violation of Marbury? It overturns Marbury thus
dissolves SCOTUS in favor of CORP US. The clerk is the liable in addition to the
judges signing off on it, as the clerks are to defy such an order as it itself is
intrinsically, fatally flawed: It constitutes a criminal act. No people, then no idea,
then no action, then no order, then no proof. Dead bodies do not produce cognizant
work, paper or otherwise thus it sticks to you as individuals. The painful emotional
truth the judges on this bench cannot seem to own? The exact same one Roberts
and I had to conquer: Owning the fact that we had been victimized by CORP US;
that we were victims when that seems to be impossible as HOW can that happen to
the Chief Justice or to me if we are so able and knowledgeable? If proof is life
isn’t the proof that we are not victims the fact that we rose to power on our own
volition? No, we rose to power in spite of our own hard work as people absolute us
to death deliberately digging and picking at our human frailties...lawyers actually
sat down and psychologically profiled us to then find a flaw they could exploit.
Lawyers do the same thing before this bench and then even change their
arguments based upon what they think they know but do not. Honesty is not the
same thing as sincerity; a lawyer can be honest but wholly insincere. Until this
bench can admit it too is a victim? Creating justice is not possible. “Entirely
without merit” constitutes an exact lie or perjury in this case. See the psych profile
done on me which has all sorts of things underlined – who underlined them and
who gave it to the third parties attorneys? I knew to watch out for this thus pre-
empt this attack labeled a “legal” and “voluntary” action as my lawyer friends

43
warned me by telling me all about their antics; it is very funny that the adversarial
party ended up being labeled “unreasonable”. Knowing doctors too can be honest
but wholly insincere? I was wholly honest and wholly sincere thus laid waste to
them with the truth as HE ended up underlining all the incorrect things. I will
show you what he wholly missed.

6. The only reason I'm motioning for you to reconsider your reasoning, decision
and ruling or your application of lawlessness and rule but not anything actually
written by The Founders? So the process is finally exhausted thus when WE do
put you to death? You cannot cry you did not know or that WE did not inform you.
WE did inform you and you then gave us your informed consent to put you to
death for treason. You wrote it down and signed it. Unsign it! Change your mind
based upon this new knowledge. As life is proof? FOUR TIMES I DID ALL I
COULD TO GET ARRESTED AND FOUR TIMES I WAS NOT. So far the Secret
Service, FBI, local police and US Marshal has chosen their own life over yours.
They have not chosen me but they have not chosen you either. We call that a draw
in chess (This order? I have you in checkmate and you do not possess John Roberts
option when in checkmate and he only gets to use that option once). They were
waiting to see your ruling and order. I told you: The Navy wished me luck when I
STOOD IT DOWN; THE NAVY SAID IF ANYONE CAN WE KNOW YOU,
SUSAN, WILL. The Navy’s job is NOT to make it easy. Ideally they aren’t to go
out of their way to harm me but hey, I reason the Navy acts in direct proportion to
the actual, legal threat that I am to the old and now failed model. I quoted US law
and case law and they told me WE ARE NOT AWARE A COUP HAS
OCCURRED. I fact checked the Navy: did it know of Brown II? Yes. Did it mean
to keep a woman from one exact Office? Yes. Did it know what this, reality of BVG
and the upcoming Election 08, then constituted? No. Congressional Res. 511 did
not exist then. I said, knowing the paper trail is well hidden and even nonexistent, I
believe you as you might not be able to know. I’ll prove a coup has occurred by
standing down the offices of Chief Justice and President. The Navy said, Good
luck and if it is possible [ for a lone voter with no resources execept her vote ] WE
know you, Susan, will. I told officer Bob M. of JAG: And when I do? Your name,
Bob M., is at the top of my very, very short list. YOU not the Navy. Bob M. said
woman and named one exact office not the Navy. I never spoke to THE Navy, the
top person at that time according to chain of command theory. I wrote to him in the
form of an emergency application and petition in support of it as he is JOHN

44
ROBERTS and he (or his clerk, his agent) acted for me. Eisenhower warned me:
He said, Beware of a Military-Industrial complex rising to power; it is your
greatest danger Susan. He never used the word Susan: “This conjunction of an
immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American
experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in
every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We
recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to
comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all
involved; so is the very structure of our society”, Speech, 1961. THE
CONJUNCTION. No longer controlled by civilians but by CORP US as Wilson
retained his post legally as Commander in Chief and then Bush Jr. was installed. A
coup several times over as BVG is too as is Obama. It is a coup by any name: of
CORP US and privateers being made legal or made permanent as one can never,
ever remove where campaign funding comes from and how it is done or that
Obama announced DURING the process that he would use private funding after
first agreeing to use only public funding so that the playing field was obliterated.
SCOTUS itself has heard 4 identical PAC cases as nobody has been able to make
the WHOLE case correctly until I did. Souter even expressed the idea within a
ruling that he was going to poke his eyes out with a fork if he had to deal with
another SAME EXACT PAC CASE as the lawyers are missing it by a mile. Souter
did not use those exact words but close to it as he expressed extreme frustration
and boredom. See Erwin Chemerinsky, in “Constitutional Law Principals and
Policies” as he noticed this too and thought it was important enough to note in this
textbook. OVERTHROW BACKED BY A MILITARY WHO IS UNAWARE OF
IT, AS IT WOULD NEVER EVER AGREE IF IT KNEW. See Bush memos
Obama released indicating CORP US could and would give police military power
or assume it themselves NOT as headed by a civilian but by the CORP US used
against the citizens thus they hired lawyers to exploit the fact and law and US
history along with human emotion against The People exactly as if The People are
the enemy named in the Trading with Enemies Act ; See taxes collected via CORP
US exerting what are military not police powers. If I can and did reason this and
act in one direction – righteousness – then couldn’t this group of people or any one
of these people reason this also but act in the opposite direction for or towards
evil? YES! I knew to flee for my life as my legal problem went way beyond a NY
County Court and so I fled directly to JOHN ROBERTS and SCOTUS as due to
BVG, Rehnquist’s death and my actions Roberts ‘inherited’ Command of the

45
Military as did I. I knew he must be informed: The event horizon has been
realized. Our only choice now? Straight on ahead into the blue as you can, will
and do escape a black hole if you are ethical by exiting on the other side. The
fatal mistake of the past is made when people fight against the law at work or
against the intrinsic force. You cannot fight the Constitution as it is originally
written and win as that force? It is a law of this universe. This is an order to
act or stand down as this is an actual life or death emergency and I am
prepared to shoot to kill if you refuse to obey this order as it is firmly based
upon fact and US law; it stands purely and absolutely or as wholly
constitutional. You have a copy of the exact order. I delivered it to both Roberts
and a local federal judge via first class mail. I then made an attempt to contact the
Post Master General to hand deliver it. Either it is an actual life and death
emergency or I am the greatest, most skilled story teller you have ever met.
It’s all real, actual and current, an actual safety issue and is history, or I
deserve several academy awards and a Nobel Prize for literature. I lawfully
and honorably discharged my sworn duties. I paid the highest price a person can
ever pay. CORP US does not award women the Congressional Medal of Honor so
the SCOTUS docket exactly naming “Conferenced” or hearing, and “11/20/08” or
direct action, constitutes that for me. If CORP US forces lemons upon me? Lay
low, wait until they are thoroughly rotten, aim for their heads and then RETURN
FIRE! Ideally only one head must roll over and die. Military strategists and tactical
experts – actual Commanders - understand this language, as it is military jargon not
legal jargon. My hands are not bloody as I did all I could to stop this madness
known as the current and recent past state of this nation. I am not “crazy” and I am
not a “hysterical woman”. Hamilton would tell you that the thought “hysterical” is
overtly sexist and used to harm women only as men do not have uteri nor
hysterectomies. The DOD lists this as the body count: 08/09, 10 AM: 3,465 Killed
In Action and the DOJ lists: Violent acts against women, 2006: 2,649,050 not
including homicide or violence against persons under 12; rape and child
molestation is a form of murder (statistics and odds are not the same nor are
samples of populations versus actual crimes nor are reported crimes versus actual
crimes). US law is one of horizontal and vertical checks and balances. Vertical
checks and balances have been ignored; our military has been abandoned and
Clinton is at fault; any problem the military has can be directly traced to having the
honor code and honor bond violated at the highest levels possible. Lawyers, like
atheists, have proven they make for terrible and useless Commanders unless they

46
have actual experience Commanding such as prior military service or the
equivalent, motherhood. A mother is to know how to command, as it is the job.

7. I told the SCOTUS clerks: You might have to take a hit for The Constitution
thus The People. I told them: Do not concern yourselves with my words, as we
know what actually happened as we lived it. If you are not guilty then I will not
allow anyone to make that claim. I may but nobody else may. If it seems as if you
are guilty? The only thing to do is say it out loud; make the accusation known or
name what seems as if as then the accused has an opportunity to destroy that idea if
it is wrong or mistaken. If people suspect the court is crooked you want The People
to know, to own the truth, one way or the other. If you do not say it out loud, write
it down, then the People will always wonder and always suspect wrongdoing.
They’ll manufacture falsehoods but truly believe them as fact w/o question as they
are struggling to make sense of it all. If it’s an actual trust issue then you need to
restore trust. An honest person can stand up to anything. If it is not true it goes
away. If it seems to be discrimination name it. Did the clerks file 08-6622 or not?
07-9804 took seven months to file! 08-6622? One day. It went away so either it
was going on in error or it was a mistake; it was not intentional. If it was
intentional I’d still be trying to get in not back in, lol. My true belief? The clerks
did not know something I incorrectly assumed everybody knew. The clerks
docketed and the Justices heard a petition that named an exact injury that resulted
from my interaction with them; this court then must rise to meet the clerks as they
set the standard. They were willing to submit themselves to my authority and the
review of The People.

8. Merits 1. Law A party's strict legal rights, excluding jurisdictional, personal, or

technical aspects. 2. The factual content of a matter, apart from emotional,
contextual, or formal considerations. A. If my case actually had no merit how did
SCOTUS twice come to believe it did have merit? See SCOTUS as SCOTUS
dockets but does not conference cases that are actually w/o merit. B. I possess
exactly named strict legal rights as enumerated in the Declaration and Constitution
that are violated; one of those strict rights? REDRESS IN AT LEAST ONE
COURT OF LAW. If you deny what is written on the paper or refuse to consider it
at all then you have denied me any voice thus any and all redress. US Case law is:
you may not claim it is legal to violate a lone persons rights as she might be the
one and only victim. Dissolution is also named as is abolish. If dissolution and

47
abolish were not a strict legal rights how did We The People ever come to dissolve
British colonial rule? Further the legal right is of a court to hear a case as original
jurisdiction. We legally refer to o.j. as the right to hear a case...WHOA! Did you
just violate SCOTUS’ strict right? The power of a Chief Justice to hear a case as a
right? A pro se constitutional authority case of original jurisdiction cancels out
“jurisdiction” from consideration when you are examining the merits of a case. If
you consider it you then are claiming SCOTUS does not exist! That no jurisdiction
exists thus it will never be heard. You’re overturning Marbury in a de facto
manner: inside your own head but not in reality. It’s wholly illogical but we did
not have SCOTUS when we defined “merit” did we? And how rare are pro se
authority cases? This rare: Marbury never knew he is one; Marshall knew and I
knew so that makes two cases but only six people in the know: Adams, Hamilton,
Jefferson, Madison, Marshall and me. C. Remove all of the emotional, contextual
and formal considerations. The fact w/o any question whatsoever is: there remains
a solid legal case before you that you do not want to hear for whatever reason. The
People, a jury, will not be asking why you did it. Your personal, technical and
jurisdictional reason is not a consideration as it is not a merit of your case or your
defense. D. The fact is LIBERTY and SAFETY are emotions and exactly named
rights. Safety? It might be strict but liberty is a strict right. If you claim entirely
w/o merit? You have just stated that you read the governing documents and
nowhere did you read the word “liberty” and upon examining the cited case law
did not read the word “liberty”. Did I or did I not claim that it is impossible to
reason with unreasonable people, that it is impossible to reason with those who are
not willing to reason and that sitting federal judges who “deny” LIBERTY is the
fabric of our law and that we have LIBERTY rights and that you will find that
word all over US case law (and the word safety as well) and who have never once
felt liberty as an emotion and physical sensation then must be removed as they are
not fit to serve and that they must recuse themselves via sending my case ahead as
they lack a human ability you must, must, must possess to then adjudicate this
case? (See John Adams “fireworks” description in a letter written to his wife on
the very day we LIBERATED ourselves from Britain). I now proffer: Any court
issuing this order? It lacks one other human ability: HUMILITY. (See Washington,
Jefferson and Pershing and all of our Original Founders). It’s an impossible
standard as if the only way to learn and so own humility is by hearing the case but
this court and these exact judges refuse and do so illegally and possibly criminally
then HOW are they ever going to come by humility? Humility like liberty cannot

48
be gift-wrapped and handed to another person as if it is a Christmas present. This
court is confused or so it seems: I’m over 18; I’m not asking my daddy for
emancipation. I’m taking what is already my own. To stop me you have to humble
yourself and so meet me in person the conundrum being: It’s too late! You had to
stop me before I experienced actual liberation not after as you cannot take an
experience of life out of a person! E. So, EVERY suit against Obama is w/o merit?
As my suit was brought first, my suit meets the burden every other cannot, lawyers
are now borrowing some of my unique intellectual property to bring new suits (I
gave them my permission to do so) and my suit included Obama’s own words out
of his own mouth thus if mine is w/o merit so are theirs and you know, at least four
others have not been told w/o merit. I truly believe: You do not want to be the court
to say BYE BYE to Obama and to inform the citizens that BVG was never legal as
you fear what MIGHT come after. a, I’ll say it to Obama for you as that’s chain of
command theory. YOU? You do not have to say a word. b, BVG and all of its
effects? The citizens did it to themselves. I will be saying that to the citizens for
you as well and I can address all those parents who lost children in the war, as I
know what it feels like to suffer the death of your child. Have you lost a child? I
will do all the talking you cannot and/or may not. Jefferson would tell you more
harm has been done by what never came to be than by what did come to pass. In
fact, he did say this. c. ‘Obama suits”? My suit is a SOVEREIGNTY SUIT OR
ABOUT ME & WE, THE PEOPLE NOT OBAMA. Put any name at all in
Obama’s stead; my case still stands. The Federal Judiciary’s game playing led to
Obama as you could have heard me YEARS ago or sent it ahead as I asked on
4/4/07 thus you and I would have met at the very least a year ago, before Obama
was ‘elected’ to the CORP US SEAT. Carl Jung would tell this court: If Susan’s
case was actually w/o merit? All of this would have gone away; her children would
be with her AND women would have equality AND there would be no financial
collapse AND violent crime would not be AND nobody but nobody would still be
filing lawsuits against Obama. But yet it’s still here and still getting worse not
better. Nothing has ‘gone away’. Jung said YOU CREATE WHAT YOU REFUSE
TO ACKNOWLEDGE. See your own federal docket, the nations federal docket,
as you can actually look up how many Obama suits there are from where you are
sitting. I know as your own court rules say my entries must lie flat when open as
you might be at your desk going back and forth from my suit to a computer. Your
court rules exactly state COMPUTER as the reason.

49
9. I did not need 20 pages but I took them. I need one sentence and thanks to the
SG of the US I have it: On April 1st, 2008 (no joke) when waiving any interest
or right in 07-9804 the Solicitor General of the US waived your interest (the
interest of the judges and clerks reading this and CORP US) and waived your
right, to vote, act as a judge or clerk, express your opinion on anything or to
collect a salary and all of your rights (the rights of the judges and clerks
reading this and CORP US). The SG placed this in writing, signed it and sent
it to SCOTUS. Legally via an official decision made on your behalf you have
no interest and no right as you made no objection and on August 3rd, 2009,
upheld that waiver. SCOTUS served you notice twice, 07-9804 & 08-6622, and
twice you failed to answer or to object in any way. SCOTUS gave you more
than a fair and just opportunity; as our law is only one opportunity need exist. I,
the case, never left SCOTUS only some of not all of the paper with my name
printed on it did. Jurisdiction and issue did not magically change as our law did
not nor did I quit and/or fail. The law is any actual power and authority you might
come to have in this world? YOU GET IT FROM ME OR WE THE PEOPLE
NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! But first it is born of the Creator. You can
and may give it away but not take it from me or from We. You gave your power
and authority away to me, SCOTUS and the People. You can and may do it, and
should in this unique case, but you want to do it legally, with informed consent. So
I wrote down the legal history thus informing you.

10. I not once ever wanted to become President. I had higher aspirations: Supreme
Court Justice. I was like a laser beam solely focused on that one institution and
how to get in on my own, as I knew there was a door no person could see. Jesus
told me he broke in for me. Jesus told me that he set a place for me. The Founders
repeated this to me over and over. They fully admitted: The only proof we have is
our own existence as an independent nation. You might fail us. Susan, you of all
people cannot fail us! They did not say this exactly they said it with symbols or
clues as they enshrined the truth of who and what they are as people all over the
place – in letters, books, rulings, currency, maps, portraits, schools, flags,
architecture, words etc. etc. You see a red, white and blue flag while I see, hear and
feel “Abraham” and the promise God made that came true for him, then
Washington and now me. You see a leaky ceiling where I see actual stars: Polaris
and Orion. You see a building and a filing system while I see a living institution,
the Library of Congress, with a plaque that makes me laugh: “Jefferson” as he

50
created it with his own books, books that now bear a Library of Congress ‘code’
number. You see actual money where I see Hamilton’s face but I think SAFETY
and feel, ‘This new multicolored junk looks like it came out of a monopoly game;
it may as well have for it’s worthless’. IMF? Andrew Jackson defeats the Bank of
the US! Your reality is false; it is not my own as I learned to see past the physical
world as the physical is all an illusion; physical things symbolize the truth.
Physicists who are doing nothing more than searching for God told me exactly to
check the pulse rate of the respiring universe. So I knew – you, all of you, are
‘crazy’ as you are looking at THINGS and not considering the PEOPLE, or,
HUMAN HEARTS. The truth of the Founders is their mind and human heart, still
living. You can and do hear it and feel it if you listen. It’s the emotional result of
their grand experiment that I knew to look for as you cannot see emotion but
liberty and safety are emotions and are rights. They made us safe. You made me
unsafe. I changed my awareness of the pulse rate of the respiring nation aka the
People...I began to follow the First We The People or the Delaware Indians as their
actual name means “We, the People” and then Jesus accidentally by design by
following John Adams as I cannot hear, see or feel what I am way too close to, a
body of belief known as “Thomas Jefferson”. I know they lock the door at night.
I know the building is guarded. I know lawyers are hogging all the seats. That’s
your reality; a fantasy in your head based upon past events and past failure to act
not what is now as I acted as did Roberts. My reality? Lawyers acting as if they
are hogs is against the spirit of the law. That was then this is now. I’m already in!
No lock, guard or lawyer can or may keep me out as long as I act in my own
defense and always have an answer for Roberts. Later I began defending The
Founders as the name “Patriot Act” constitutes defamation of character as proven
by those aforementioned “Bush” memos. Are these guys nuts to act upon the belief
that they can keep me, the product or culmination of all who came before me, out?
That they can fine tune history to then pervert the law thus overthrow The People?
Wakey, wakey! The Founders built it into the design: our law is designed to
include you as when The Founders open a door and all 13 original states ratify it
no modern federal judge or corporation can close it. If the door is not there? The
tool to make the door is. And if that door is created, opened and so there it is w/o
any lock but you do not know how to walk through it? Or people keep stopping
you from entering? You have written and unwritten instructions! Copy a play out
of the Founders book, which is their lives or if you prefer the Federalist Papers:
Act, act as if you belong there and people will believe you do...or actually disguise

51
yourself with math in the form of words not numbers and vice versa. By the time
they recognize the truth of your argument in light of the facts and US law? It’s too
late - you’re in! Or: Say you know how and then act, take that step, faking it all
the way if you have to as life will eventually prove you wrong or right and the
only real master you ever have is experience. Addicts call this faking it until you
are making it – making US law and history that is! Fortunately for me I was born
a legal prodigy. This nation does not recognize legal prodigies, as those in charge
truly believe you cannot know something if an anointed ‘authority’ keeps the
knowledge from you. You do not understand “reasoning” is inborn and acquired.
You, a lawyer, truly believe you have to learn the law in a law school or it is
impossible as it is an ultra-exclusive, closed club. Do musical prodigies need
music lessons? No! I, like a genius musician, am born with this skill, a human
quality and a human ability. How did that first black or Native lawyer, a SCOTUS
case, come to be? They did it on their own, that’s how. You victimized them until
they knew to then act in the opposite direction, as an opposing force against you,
thus overcoming the made up barriers which exist in your mind and within your
heart but not within US law. The other reason this nation lost out on me the
prodigy and still does not recognize me as a genius? Stendhal told me: ALL
WOMEN BORN GENIUSES ARE LOST TO THE PUBLIC GOOD. How is this
good for the public??? It defies reason and our law, if not the sitting officers, is
reasonable as reason is the very nature of its design. You know what else it is?
Intention, as all of this is intentional. The Founders meant for me to happen!

Conclusion

Motion to reconsider granted so Susan's ruling is upheld: BLACK, CARNES and

MARCUS are MOOT as they are guilty of treason. The death penalty may now be
carried out IF and only IF they do not revoke the waiver of their rights by hearing
this case in person or issuing an order AGAINST Obama, Roberts and the US
(Sending it to SCOTUS) not against reason thus against our Constitution. NO
OTHER CHOICES ARE CONSTITUTIONAL OR EVEN REMOTELY
REASONABLE OR RATIONAL AND A FAILURE TO CHOOSE ONE OF
THESE IS THEN TREASON IN THIS CASE. AN ORDER CITING RULE AND
THE WORDS “DISMISSED” “MOOT” AND “ENTIRELY WITHOUT MERIT”
CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL ACT. It rises to treason as this bench now knows
the facts of US history, BVG, Obama and the UN/IMF thus knows its own seats

52
are only made legal or become constitutional, separate and apart from CORP US
upon hearing this case in person or issuing a ruling against Obama and the US as
in CORP US; it must read “Obama”, “US”, “defendant” and “unconstitutional” in a
fashion that unequivocally states Obama, his facts and his actions such as
purchasing the Executive seat when not qualified as he is a dual citizen or not a
citizen at all (Obama himself admitted this openly; you saw that piece of evidence
rising to proof from Obama’s own website as he did not hide this fact or any facts
at first but only after The People began to protest and the paper written in 2006 by
an Obama associate advocating the foreignization of the Office thus Obama’s
installation was planned from at least as far back as that date), and that CORP US
as it exists today is not legal and is repugnant thus void and so is the 08 election. It
might read “Roberts” but it might not as like a bead sliding across an abacus this
court can address Roberts injury as his rights have been violated and he was the
victim of a crime as CORP US lied to his face about his appointment but like Earl
Warren he acted against his victimization, not against me but for me and for
himself, when I informed him of it and objected in his name and in SCOTUS’ name
by turning him into a pro se plaintiff not a defendant thus ruling WITH HIM AND
FOR WE THE PEOPLE. In this manner this bench rules itself to be NOT GUILTY
OF TREASON BUT ONLY ACCOUNTABLE FOR ANY RESULTING
PERSONAL INJURY TO SUSAN. A federal judge is to know:

Automatically upon re-entry to SCOTUS this case becomes Herbert, pro se and or
with Roberts, pro se or all pro se litigants against those who are not pro se, Obama
and the US, as all citizens failed us when they failed to reason their vote and
Obama/Biden has a lawyer, Bob Bauer as does the CORP US, the Solicitor
General. Bauer’s firm’s interests conflict with The People’s as their sole interest
seems to be Corporate US and clients building corporations in Laos, Nepal and
China. The SG? Theirs seems to conflict too due to that waiver as that is an office
that represents CORP US thus HERBERT and ROBERTS then represent their own
persons and WE, the People while the US Attorney protects the class.

I openly and directly challenged Roberts to prove to me, the authority, that he or
one of his clerks is indeed a super legal genius of my and John Marshall’s caliber
and is ethical. I demanded that he prove he is my equal as his appointment was not
arbitrary and that he was acting in defense of The Constitution and so The People
and not CORP US. As I can legally dissolve him via arguing arbitrarily Stevens

53
and Ginsburg are next in line thus his appointment was meant to prevent a woman
from ever becoming Chief thus keeping CORP US exclusively male for at least
two more decades thus entrenching CORP US permanently, and I used the exact
words of persons within the Bush administration to prove this beyond any doubt, I
openly challenged him and his clerks. I knew some of my injury was not deliberate
but are these people fit to serve? Have they been injured beyond repair? I said in
petitions, exhibits and letters as contacting a defendant is not ex parte
communication nor is contacting the adversarial party, the US attorney as he is
adversarial on paper only as he protects the class, The People, thus if I do too and
if I am as able and capable as I claim I would then give him all of the knowledge
he needs to do his job exactly as The Founders gave me all of the same tools they
had (some words are exact): You bring out your biggest, baddest guns; you create
the most impossible standard you can think of and I will meet and exceed it. I am
willing to meet any burden and any standard you name no matter how strict or
how impossible it seems to be as I know you must be certain - assured beyond any
doubt – that I can and will make this case as the one thing you cannot do is let me
begin only to fail in the final hour. I admit I did not expect Roberts to use the
fabled SCOTUS “Cloak of Invisibility”: act but not file the paper. It was rumored
to exist and I knew it did; would he use it? I did consider it – fleetingly - but I did
not consider it seriously. When he or his clerk, his agent, played that card? I got
exactly what I asked for and deserved as I also said: Always arrive at the scene of
battle with at least one secret weapon. What’s more secret than invisible? Think:
the docket is never invisible; dates as in math will be visible. By its nature
SCOTUS maintains a cloak of secrecy; combine secrecy with invisibility and you
have the biggest baddest gun there is. I thought, This is chess! You can’t change the
rules to get out of checkmate! Or can you? As the duality of the universe dictates a
chessboard is also a checkerboard...Ha! KING ME! But not with a crown! I knew
then: Now it sticks to the lawyers who did this to us, as we are rubber or immune
thanks to me and SCOTUS (Roberts, SCOTUS, myself and The People of which
this bench is are all immune from further harm and from liability if only you act
constitutionally once you know) as the impossible standard created? I was able to
meet it and I outdid even myself: Aha...Roberts and I have achieved a state of
equilibrium...Name Roberts exactly if you are able and willing and prove your
case without asking to see Obama’s paper and without asking SCOTUS to violate
it’s tradition of secrecy. This is where SCOTUS and I have always been in
agreement as there is actual constitutional reasoning SCOTUS should maintain its

54
secrecy and you may not ask for paper as proof in this type of case: It is as I said,
“Can you ever trust the paper these unjust people generate?” Who trusts paper?
Trust is an emotional relationship like liberty and safety. Paper feels no emotion
nor returns any emotion. It cannot reason anything by itself and so has no will. Can
and will paper act for you in an emergency? Trust, like love, is for people not
paper. Trust CORP US?

CORP US is now and always was flagrantly disrespecting The Constitution and
they flaunt it openly. It is one of the most dangerous precedents of all that any
nation can ever set: persons upon every level ignoring the law including the
Executive, the very persons charged with the duty to enforce the law. It is not
possible to enforce the law while entering the office in violation of it nor while
continuing to violate it once installed in that office. The first thing Obama would
have to do to then make his election legal? RESIGN as then he’d be enforcing the
Constitution. That is the only way he could then turn around, enter SCOTUS and
make his case to then certify his election as legal as the argument to do so exists
and his resignation is then serves as proof he was not willing to obey an
unconstitutional order issued by The People let alone CORP US. I have weighed
the evidence: Super legal geniuses? Obama and Bauer?! Not! but Roberts (or his
clerk) has proven his genius and willingness so he can and may represent himself
and the People with me or sit as Chief Justice. We are on the side of the
Constitution and The Founders. Black, Carnes and Marcus are supposed to be on
that same side.

By their very design federal judges and so all citizens are to be intentionally
constitutional and of good behavior. Federalist 78, Hamilton: “To avoid an
arbitrary discretion in the courts, it is indispensable that they should be bound
down by strict rules and precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty
in every particular case that comes before them;...controversies...grow out of the
folly and wickedness of mankind,...and ...demand long and laborious study to
acquire a competent knowledge of them...there can be but few men in the society
who will have sufficient skill in the laws to qualify them for the stations of
judges...making the proper deductions for the ordinary depravity of human nature,
the number must be still smaller of those who unite the requisite integrity with the
requisite knowledge...Upon the whole, there can be no room to doubt that the
convention acted wisely in copying from the models of those constitutions which

55
have established good behavior as the tenure of their judicial offices...” Good
behavior? Today we live in a nation whereby a judge is shot for issuing a valid
order or even most sinful of all her husband is shot as the perpetrator knows if he
shoots her husband he might not be subject to the death penalty but if he shoots
and kills a federal judge? Treason thus he is subject to the death penalty and a
licensed lawyer taught him the difference, as that is the kind of work lawyers are
producing in 2009 and for pay. Until or unless a natural born lawyer became
willing to say whatever it took to then rip judges out of their seats – a comfort zone
- so the judges then could see themselves and see the problem – PROTECTION
OF THE LAW and LAWYERS corrupting it to their personal advantage with
deliberation so it no longer exists for The People in actual reality but only on paper
–judges had a blind spot they could not overcome as they couldn’t know they too
are now victims. Roberts and I undid that blindfold as it is earplugs and a gag not
an actual blindfold thus I, if I sat as a judge, would eagerly accept the opportunity
placed before me: We, the People need a patron saint; why not you?

I, Susan, was the only reason you ever needed, myself and the bill of sale of my
person and my children’s persons in the form of a deed for a house which
transferred hands for $1 and when the seller has state and national connections. We
all know houses do not trade hands for $1, especially not a house that contains a
library with leather walls. You can and may look the deed up, as it is a public
record: 143 Pawling Avenue. There’s a reason that this house was sold for $1 – to
avoid taxes and to pay the lawyer/s for their services (and possibly the involved
NY judge) as it was mortgaged that same day for 30k, or, to destroy my life. These
people meant to contain my will and liberty to the point of death to then contain
my intellectual property or stop me from entering federal court. The legal snag not
one of these people considered, as they testified on the witness stand that the house
was a “tax thing” is that I am a “tax thing”, as I was born in war fought over taxes
and so I know “no taxation without representation” is another way of saying
“control over my life was given by God to me – not to the British or the federal
courts and not to the “Council on Foreign Relations” founded by the Rockefellers -
one of the families that is inextricably involved with the IMF. If I read a
Rockefeller write that he is guilty of treason and proud of it on page 405 in his
autobiography which then is 1st person testimony and he is swearing it to be true as
his book is exchanged for federal dollars so it is a contract he has with his
publisher and any person who buys the book like my local library which receives

56
county, state and federal funding so it’s a tax thing, and later read the text of a
speech given by Hilary Clinton in which she admits that the Council runs the US
from behind closed doors and that she did not know it until she was grown and the
wife of a governor so it’s a tax thing? And then she as a Senator writes me a letter
saying that I am not her constituent, a tax thing, when my case sits in NY, the state
she ignorantly “represents” spending tax dollars? And later she is then made
Secretary of State, a tax thing? By a man who bought the Office of Executive at
best and has been committing what is voter fraud and treason at worst? We have a
big tax thing going on as this then is not just taxation but is tribute, and if I write
the word “tribute” on my money order for the “court fee” and the Jax court cashes
it or so I assume as I was instructed to mail it to the United States Federal Court at
Jacksonville? Proof! If you say “taxes” using other words to mask it or if you slip
and so write it exactly or say it out loud under oath exactly you have just confessed
to the only crime our Constitution names as I own the knowledge of my injury and
what it then constitutes and you have entered all of American history to the record
so my case has gone supernova. Taxes???

If you name unjust taxes after I name unjust taxes, then you have confessed and
my case is golden as knowledge is power and so I am most powerful person on
Earth: The Bus Boycott had nothing to do with where you sat on the bus but
sovereignty as in “you do not get to tell me where I can or cannot sit on a city bus
if we’re both paying the same taxes”. Neptune Beach, Florida, where I was first
federally injured? Born in a tax revolt as we decided we were not willing to bear
the burden of problems not our own but caused by the larger City of Jacksonville
so we became sovereign via a vote. Sovereignty means safety. You might be falsely
lulled into believing you are safe but you are not; even Washington noted the
feeling of safety after the Revolution ended when he toured the nation for six
weeks. You will never feel actual safety but only feel the false sense and so never
feel liberty as sacred as John Adams did and you will never feel Philadelphia as
sacred as I did. This case is about sovereignty, equality and the levels of human
depravity Hamilton said men are capable of sinking to if given the opportunity. It’s
about how far criminals will run if given the license and if left unchecked. If you
are Susan and “taxes” follow you wherever you go, until you are sold and NO
TAXES are paid, you never ask “Why me?” but know “why not me?” and instead
you make your case fully aware you will have to be very careful thus you get
inside and on the docket before the criminals not the Justices realize what has been

57
let loose –the truth - and then you go back to slowly inform the people with a
liability suit so there is no turning back: not only am I on the SCOTUS case
conferencing list as having been acted upon directly but the truth has left the
building as I put this in the US Mail and you cannot return knowledge once you
own it! Your reading this thus you’d have to cut off your head and return your
brain to me for that to happen. Chess players call it an “end game”; military
strategists call it “fair warning”. Obama & Co. had plenty of fair warning to
surrender to the Constitution, The People, and chose not to not to do so. Treason
and death it is then. Angry Mob, Noose or Bullet? We did not have the gas
chamber or electric chair in 1787. If I were you I’d choose HEARING IN
FEDERAL COURT as the only solution is to address Obama’s in violation of the
law installation exactly as Federalist 10 states as that then will address most of if
not all of the ill effects set in motion in 1871, 1916, 1945, 1996 and 2000.

I will tell this court what I told John Roberts in my emergency application: The
Liberty Bell cracked when tolling John Marshall’s death. The inscription on the
bell is no happy accident. It is as if God was cluing us in: The old guard is dead
and so the race is on! First one back to the bar wins...sovereignty! If you check the
record, the SCOTUS docket, SUSAN HERBERT is first. SUSAN HERBERT
made it back to the bar first! The first nonlawyer and first woman on her own! The
first lone ‘ordinary’ citizen, of The People! She willed herself into being! Ever hear
a story called the Judgment of Paris? I have. A judge is bribed with a golden apple,
one of three Hercules stole that were reputed to be so dangerous they were
eventually returned. They were the 11th labor of Hercules and one of the events that
then led up to the Trojan War. I watched Linda Griffin, of Troy, NY, reach for the
golden apple, the apple of discord, that read “For the Fairest”, the very same one
that was used as a bribe. I held out for the apple that reads “For the Most Willing”.
If you’re starving to death as lawyers and other criminals are hogging all of the
seats at the table then common sense dictates that you cannot eat gold so why
bother trying? If your name means “lily” in Hebrew God will provide as Matthew
said proof is the lilies in the field do not toil and it seems to be true based upon the
evidence – you turn lead into gold constantly - thus hold out for the feast: The
Supreme Court and restoration of our Constitution.

You are to examine and weigh US fact or history, and US law or the Constitution
and US case law, and not examine and weigh my fact – the facts of my life story -

58
or my personal beliefs. I can and will express any personal belief or idea I wish as
it is true for me and a fact of me or in protest; I can go on and on about my life. I
can and will reason and decide that Roberts is a jerk, a joke or a legal genius. He
can then agree or disagree or counter sue me. I’m the judge of my legal
relationship with Roberts or any other named person or entity. What Roberts and I
lived? You were not there, were you? What WE lived as a nation? You were
present for that; you were there for that. You’re here now. You are to extrapolate
US fact and US law; you are to discern what facts of my life are pertinent but you
are never, ever to pass judgment on Susan the person or assume she is lying and/or
not as smart as you. To dismiss my suit out of hand or to judge me is to then claim
that 200 years of American history were not lived and never happened; that all of
those people never lived and never died. It is to say that everything our Founders
did was for nothing. Perhaps you should judge if you are or are not a good enough
reason, or, if having to do it over again would the Founders act for who and what
you are?

BLACK, CARNES and MARCUS in the form of this order do not constitute US
law at work but their own whim and will (or possibly fear) at work. They may not
have known fact/s they needed to know to issue a just ruling. This ruling of my
own in the form of a motion to reconsider constitutes an arrest warrant upon a
charge of treason as well as other, lesser acts of sedition and subversion and at least
one count of perjury. Any citizen may issue or order an arrest which is why we call
it citizens arrest but in this case? I have the legal power and moral authority to
issue an actual paper legal, binding and valid arrest warrant as I am charged with
the duty to enforce the law according to our Constitution and as supported by John
Roberts action. It remains an arrest warrant until or unless it becomes a new
decision, ruling and order that is based upon our law and is made in consideration
of all of the facts and is on behalf The People and not CORP US.

Living people are organic to the Constitution and the Declaration; living people are
organic to the Government known as “We, The People” “In Congress July 4th,
1776” “Do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
You are organic to The Constitution.

This court would be wise to recall not so recent US history: When Jefferson wrote
“A Summary View On The Rights Of British America”? It was rejected outright by

59
every person in America save one when Jefferson first said it out loud and was
taken across the Atlantic after he wrote it down so became a best-seller in Britain
before recrossing the Atlantic. You might say Britain discovered America first.
People in colonial America exactly like people today denied the reality of God-
given rights; they said it was ludicrous, dangerous and impossible. Impossible? We
separated church and state not theology and state as that would be separating
reason from state. Jefferson was not lying when he called himself a farmer not a
lawyer anymore than SCOTUS was lying when it said 9= 5 – 4 =1 not 2. It’s
known as acting in self-defense. That’s reason; it’s reasonable not impossible.

Did it ever occur to you that SCOTUS wanted to make certain I had the case? As I
do not know many cases entirely without merit that are conferenced. Twice. It’s a
tax thing.

11. A brand new fact: Spain, the Albany judge who set this all in motion by
ignoring hardcore proof I entered in favor of the third party's perjured testimony
and also the perjured or wholly false affidavit sworn out in PA by an unrelated man
who is a stranger to me and who ignored a prior orders of the New Mexico Courts
and Florida Courts as if they did not exist, and refused to consider I made no
appearance in PA as it was impossible as I was in the hospital having my dominant
hand operated on so I did not lose my arm due to an injury the third party's are
directly and indirectly responsible for when Spain held the hospital records and
previous orders in his hands, and when I was not even served as PA mailed the
notice to the incorrect address, an address hundreds of miles away from my person
after I myself called PA and made certain they did have my correct address, and
when PA offered ZERO services for our reunification and openly admitted that it
did so as NO WOMAN EVER FOUGHT BACK SUCCESSFULLY BEFORE ME
THUS IT ACTED AGAINST ME WITH DELIBERATION AS PA ASSUMED I
WAS LIKE ALL THE REST OF THE "SORRY" WOMEN "OUT THERE", OR,
PA OPENLY ADMITTED TO HAVING UNCONSTITUTIONAL POLICY, now
sits on the NY 3rd District's Appellate bench (located within Albany, the home of
Garrett Murphy who sold the house for $1 and has those state and national
connections). The lone ethical person in the 3rd District Appellate who can testify
as to the missing family court transcript and my having to use him to track it down
and prove no motion to compel existed? He’s now the Clerk of the Courts. My case
has once again landed here. As justice is now made impossible and as this conflict

60
can never be overcome in any NY court I have to be heard by The People in federal
court. Exactly as I said in 1998 in the Albany County Family Court via a pro bono
lawyer: It’s a tax thing; the taxpayers are getting shafted, as am I.

ENTERED AND ORDERED AUGUST 16th, 2009.

Susan Herbert, The acting, constitutional President and Commander in Chief of

original jurisdiction as I am, as my will, my reasoning, my one vote, my ability to
add and subtract, the equal protection and due process clauses, history such as the
Revolution and Robert's action and Marbury make it so; whoever told you my
right thus my humanity is dependent upon my children, a law license and/or a
penis is incorrect!

“Since when have we Americans been expected to bow submissively to authority and speak with awe and
reverence to those who represent us?” William O. Douglas

“Those who won our independence by revolution were not cowards. They did not fear political change.
They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty.” Justice Louis Brandeis

"It is fundamental that the great powers of Congress to conduct war and to regulate the Nation's foreign
relations are subject to the constitutional requirements of due process. The imperative necessity for
safeguarding these rights to procedural due process under the gravest of emergencies has existed
throughout our constitutional history, for it is then, under the pressing exigencies of crisis, that there is the
greatest temptation to dispense with fundamental constitutional guarantees which, it is feared, will inhibit
governmental action." Justice Arthur Goldberg

“Republics are created by the virtue, public spirit and intelligence of the citizens. They fall, when the wise
are banished from the public councils, because they dare to be honest, and the profligate are rewarded
because they flatter the people, in order to betray them.” Justice Joseph Story

“I could not say less in view of questions of such gravity that go down to the very foundations of the
government. If the provisions of the Constitution can be set aside by an Act of Congress, where is the
course of usurpation to end? The present assault upon capital is but the beginning. It will be but the
steppingstone to others, larger and more sweeping, till our political contests will become a war of the poor
against the rich; a war growing in intensity and bitterness.” Justice Stephen J. Field

“Before God, I believe the hour has come. My judgment approves this measure, and my whole heart is in
it. All that I have, and all that I am, and all that I hope in this life, I am now ready here to stake upon it. And
I leave off as I began, that live or die, survive or perish, I am for the Declaration. It is my living sentiment,
and by the blessing of God it shall be my dying sentiment. Independence now, and Independence for
ever!" "Justice" John Adams

61
“People like facts are stubborn – not immutable.”

“Justice” Susan Herbert

62