Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
In this report, four website have been chosen for analysis. These websites all
have similar aims and objectives in the arena of Health in Scotland’s Central
Belt. By applying predefined criteria, this report will attempt to grade the sites
in four areas there-by generating an informed conclusion based upon content.
Four websites representing the aims, objectives and services offered by the
major health boards across central Scotland were chosen (leaving out NHS
Lanarkshire, as their portal is still under construction.) These sites have been
chosen very much with convenience in mind, with Health and how the NHS
operates (and how effectively) at a local level. They were also chosen
because they all have a shared aim to deliver advice on health issues and
news of developments to those living within the health board area.
Analysis criteria comes under four categories; Clarity, Quality, Usability and
Satisfaction. Each of these is further split into two; Clarity of Content & Clarity
of Intent, Quality of Technology & Quality of Navigation, Use of Interactivity &
Use of Navigation and finally; Satisfaction of Customer Aim & Satisfaction of
Over All Experience.
• Clarity of Content
o Layout
o Images
o Simplicity
o Elegance
• Clarity of Intent
o Website aim
• Quality of Technology
o Standard of technology in use (Video conferencing, DHTML,
Java, pod casting, flash, real player, Streaming video, XML,
CSS & P2P technologies.)
o Fully accessible (web page readers, font size increase tools.)
• Quality of Navigation
o Logical navigation
o Relevant links
• Use of Interactivity
o Level of interactivity. Two/three dimensional.
• Use of Information
o Succinctness
o Accuracy (In grammar and spelling.)
o Logical layout
The above points formed the basis for the evaluation form used in this report.
ANALYSIS.
Clarity of Content
The over all aim of all four websites is one of communication, while layout
seems to be similar across the board NHS Lothian has made an effort at a
more light hearted possibly frivolous portal. Each uses columns to delineate
subject content except Lothian, which has gone for a more nucleated layout.
The over all effect is while Lothian’s Portal seems relatively uncluttered; the
other sites seem to be rather busy. There is no uniformity between sites what
so ever.
Content across all four sites seem to come under four distinct categories;
news, publications, patient information and publicity drives for projects. While
Lothian provides a ruthlessly cut down version of the news, Glasgow, Forth
Valley and Fife provide lengthy hyperlinked blurbs on their index pages. This
could have the effect of cluttering the portal unnecessarily making it difficult to
separate the wheat from the chaff.
Clarity of Intent
Website aims differ also, while some have at their heart the needs of the
public purely in terms of health, others favour recent news pertaining to
infrastructure hinting at possible attempts to improve the image of the health
board. This is done at the cost of the primary website aim which presumably
is to impart information pertaining to the health of those residing in the health
board area.
NHS Fife and Forth Valley put as much emphasise on news items as they do
on health issues. Hospital builds are advertised along side health promotions
where as with NHS Lothian and Glasgow, the focus is on health issues. While
the latter two sites have news items on display, they are very much secondary
to health promotions. The four chosen sites can easily be delineated along
these lines. It may also be useful to point out that the National Scottish NHS
hosts NHS Fife and NHS Lothian, this means certain central policies
regarding content and intent must be adhered to, (Guidelines for Accessibility.
Show Team 2003.) Forth Valley and Glasgow have opted out of those
National level policies by having a .com and .org extension respectively.
Quality of Technology
Technology standards are good across the board, largely due to rigorous
standards set by government in terms of Equality & Diversity. Each site has
direct links on the index page to website readers and each also have the
option to view versions of the website in other languages. Fife and Lothian are
using asp.net (java driven) while Glasgow and Forth Valley have opted for a
largely html driven platform. Currently no pod casting is available nor is there
any resource for RSS or video streaming.
All four sites use a CMS although it is not possible to know which is utilized
and by whom. It is highly likely the sites hosted by the Scottish NHS use an
Open Source CMS known as Sprocket as this is the new standard being
adopted by NSS (National Services Scotland.)
Accessibility is part of the NHS’s Equality and Diversity drive so there are
many resources from website readers to tools for the visually impaired. NHS
Lothian appears to have the best coverage in terms of accessibility due to it
not relying on text boxes and table. Website readers find blocks of text
contained with tables hard to read. Lothian also has a simple zoom function
displayed on each page.
Quality of Navigation
Navigation seems logical across all four sites, although some are more
cluttered than others. Those that are do have a home page link displayed at
all times. Each site has a search function prominently displayed in the header
so is available from each page within the site. All site index pages are hyper-
link heavy having as they do, several across the page. On some it is not
immediately obvious what is and what is not a link.
Use of Interactivity
All sites offer a degree of interactivity, each have contact forms and most have
done away with mailto scripts (except those sites utilising html where some
mailto scripts still hide.) It is worth noting, the Lothian site has an alcoholic unit
calculator taking it to a higher level of interactivity than the other sites. Apart
from being instructive this could be seen as an added draw to the site and
may act as something of an attraction.
For the most part, these sites act as billboards; they hold and display
information. Interaction is limited, there is no online diagnosis service or chat
rooms (real time or IRC.) In all four cases, the health advice aspect of the web
site is handled by strong coverage of NHS 24 which has an extensive website
itself.
Use of Information
Layout might also be seen as somewhat whimsical, each site is different, and
while Lothian is less cluttered it is hard to find a deeper logic on the other sites
due to the range and breadth of information beyond noticing that ‘news’ is in
one place while ‘contact information’ is in another. Spelling and grammar is of
a high standard across all four sites except where sound bites have been
adopted in order to promote news items. In these instances, grammar has
taken something of a back seat.
The search boxes can not be configured to search specific areas so may not
be entirely useful in terms of focused user research.
On Fife’s site the Google search tool is utilised, as is the case on Forth Valley.
A bespoke search tool is provided use on Lothian’s site. But by far the most
useful is the search tool available on the NHS Glasgow site. At first glance in
appears to be a standard search function, however, search results are
provided according to the categories in which they were found; news, site
content, services, locations and document library. This could be seen as
selling point given that internet and site searches can be problematic in terms
of setting parameters, often it seems easier to state what is not required as
opposed to what is.
When looking for specific information to satisfy this part of our form; ‘customer
satisfaction.’ The topic of Smoking was chosen; by far the most useful
information was gleaned from the NHS Glasgow site purely due to the
categorisation of the search results. Potential users can better differentiate
between what is salient and what is not.
It should be said, ‘stop smoking’ projects feature heavily on each index page,
it was chosen merely to test the search functions of each web site. In the real
world, the user wouldn’t have to search as it features prevalently on each
index page.
Conclusion
REFERENCE
Peter Williams, David Nicholas, Paul Huntington & Fiona McLean. Wiley
Interscience. Retrieved 18/03/09 from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-
bin/fulltext/118963727/HTMLSTART
Naish, John (2008) ‘Enough’ Pg 147 Great Britain: Hodder & Stoughton