Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Febrero, 2008
1134
Toda correspondencia en relacin con este trabajo debe dirigirse al Servicio de Informacin y Documentacin, Centro de Investigaciones Energticas, Medioambientales y Tecnolgicas, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040-MADRID, ESPAA.
Los descriptores se han seleccionado del Thesauro del DOE para describir las materias que contiene este informe con vistas a su recuperacin. La catalogacin se ha hecho utilizando el documento DOE/TIC-4602 (Rev. 1) Descriptive Cataloguing On-Line, y la clasicacin de acuerdo con el documento DOE/TIC.4584-R7 Subject Categories and Scope publicados por el Ofce of Scientic and Technical Information del Departamento de Energa de los Estados Unidos.
Editorial CIEMAT
S70 PLASMA HEATING; BERNSTEIN MODE, ELECTRON PLASMA WAVES; TOKAMAK DEVICES; STELLARATORS; T CODES
Abstract:
The TRUB (pipeline in Russian) code is a computational tool for studying thepropagation of Gaussian-shaped microwave beams in a prescribed equilibrium plasma. This manual covers the basic material hended to use the implementation of TRUBA (version 3.4) interfaced with the numerical library of the TJ-II stellarator. The manual provides a concise theoretical background of the problem, specications for setting up the input les and interpreting the output of the code, and some information useful in modifying TRUBA.
Resumen:
El cdigo TRUB (tubera en ruso) es una herramienta computacional para estudiar la propagacin de haces gaussianos de mircroondas en un equilibrio de plasma prescrito. El presente manual muestra los materiales mnimos necesarios para usar la versin 3.2 del programa TRUBA, interconectada con la librera que provee las caractersticas del equilibrio del stellarator TJ-II. El manual aporta tambin un repaso terico conciso al problema, las especicaciones de los cheros de entrada y de salida del cdigo y la informacin necesaria para las posibles futuras modicaciones de TRUBA.
1) Prokhorov Institute of General Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia 2) Laboratorio Nacional de Fusin por Connamiento Magntico, Asociacin EURATOM-CIEMAT para Fusin, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Contents
Gaussian microwave beam in the complex eikonal form .....................1 Power transfer along the ray trajectory ............................................1 Shape of the Gaussian beam ..........................................................3 Non-relativistic ray Hamiltonian ......................................................4 Weakly relativistic ray Hamiltonian ................................................. 5 Absorption of the ray ...................................................................8 Reduction of Reduction of
L M
Vacuum solution for the beam shape ............................................ 10 Input files for the code ................................................................ 12 Output of the code ..................................................................... 15 Internal structure of the code ....................................................... 18 Synopsis of subroutines .............................................................. 20
1 E = E0(s ) exp i w N (s ) dr + 2 M (s ) + iL (s ) dr dr i wt . c
(1)
Hereinafter the Einstein sum convention for repeated indices is implied, and the coordinate system
{r }
dr = r R (s ) ,
s
where
R(s )
is the space curve of the central (reference) ray of the beam, with
being a
parameter of this ray. The treatment (1) is also known as the paraxial WKB expansion of the wave field phase. Matrices
and
G = N (s ) + (M (s ) + iL (s )) dr ,
d R d [ ] G G r =R (s ) = ds r=R(s ) ds
M = M , L = L .
(2)
which is the gradient of the
r . Hence,
(3)
dR dN = ds ds
dR =0. ds
(4)
E0
under
(5)
e(m ) K
eigenvalue
l(m )
I
= n 2I nn K , n
wave vector,
l(m ) = 0 .
H e (m )*e (m ) P = c |A |2 n ( ) n =N(s ) 16 p
and the sink term in the stationary power balance equation
(6)
is given by
P = w
A (m )* (m ) w = i w |A |2 e e n =N(s ) , 8p
(7)
with
and
Re l(m ) = 0
reference ray hypercurve in the 6D phase space. Within the ansatz of (1), the 3D trajectory
r = R(s )
d R/ds ,
[H n ]n =N(s ) ,
where
H (r, n) = f Re l(m )
result, one can define
and
f = f (r, n)
H=
Re l j j
=0 ,1,2
( )
= det(H ) .
(8)
However, when more than one eigenvalue tends to zero, it is necessary to somehow isolate the root corresponding to the required mode. The aforesaid power balance equation in the ray coordinates takes the form
dP = sgn P d R d R w , ds ds ds
Therefore, choosing the
(9)
we obtain
H dR = n ds
(10)
dP = 2 w P [ f Im l(m ) ] , n =N(s ) c ds f = H/Re l(m ) . The invariant H = 0 holds all along and the essential condition d H /ds = 0 , together with (10), brings to
where as before,
(11)
the reference ray,
dN H = r ds
(12)
[1] M. D. Tokman, E. Westerhof, M. A. Gavrilova. Wave power flux and ray-tracing in regions of resonant absorption. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 42 (2000) 91.
Clearly, the partial derivatives in (10) and (12) are to be evaluated on the reference ray. Equations (10) and (12) are usually referred to as ray-tracing equations, and the function is known as the ray Hamiltonian.
H (r, n)
Q = M + iL ,
H = 0 , D
= + Q D r n
(13)
We note here that the total derivative along the reference ray can be written as
d dR = + D . ds s ds
The condition
(14)
dM 2H 2H 2H 2H M + M + M M L L = + r r r n r n n n ds
),
(16) (17)
2H dL 2 H 2H 2H = + + M L + M L . r n n n r n n n ds
equations [2]. The aforementioned constraints appearing now as
Equations (10) (12), (16) and (17) constitute the system of the so-called beam-tracing
H =0,
H H = n r
H =0 n
(18)
and later as a check of
s =0,
consistency. The system of equations (16) and (17) can be solved separately from (10) and (12), provided that the trajectory of the reference ray is pre-computed. So it is useful in practice to decompose the beam-tracing procedure into the reference ray tracing with the subsequent beam-shaping.
[2] E. Poli, G. V. Pereverzev, A. G. Peeters. Paraxial Gaussian wave beam propagation in an anisotropic inhomogeneous plasma. Phys. Plasmas 6 (1999) 5.
B = (0, 0, B )
and
n = (n^, 0, n ||) :
q s z0s s k =
where
k2 Y Z l s ks ks
i kYks Zks
()s
i kYks Zks
k (l
2 s
Yks 2l sYks)Zks
2l s
kY Z ks ks
i ()s
ls Y Z
2
ks
ks
(19)
2 2 = sgn(wcs) , q s = w2 ps /w , l s = n^ /u s ms ,
Z ks = Z ( zks ) , I k
is the
k th-order
Z (z ) =
i exp(i zt t 2/4)dt
(20)
The primed variables in (19) denote the derivatives of the corresponding functions with respect to their actual arguments. Since the use of TRUBA is focused upon the EC frequency range at present, the ion contribution has been neglected in this version and the sum over In order to avoid the
k is truncated to | k | 10 .
me
ue = 1
H = (ue 1) det(H ) .
(21)
(m =1,2)
2 4a a , D = a2 1 3
(22)
[3] M. Brambilla. Kinetic theory of plasma waves, homogeneous plasmas. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1998).
where
(23)
and
0 n^
Dmin > 0
prevents the Hamiltonian from degradation when the modes are nearly
degenerate (at the vacuum-plasma interface). Both O- and X- modes at densities under the O-mode cutoff are treated using the coldplasma Hamiltonian (22). The general hot-plasma Hamiltonian derived from (19) is switched on for and for
2 n >3
The TRUBA code proceeds with the O-X conversion in the following ad hoc manner. If the reflection point is revealed along the ray trajectory of the incident O-mode, and the width of the further evanescent layer is small enough, the launching point for the transmitted ray is to be determined on moving from that point along the density gradient until the dispersion relation is fulfilled again. It was shown in [4] that the ray trajectory continued from this point is asymptotically equivalent to the limiting central trajectory of the transmitted part of the wave packet. The wave vector of the launching ray is equated with its value at the reflection point. The fraction of the transmitted power is calculated using the onedimensional O-mode tunneling theory [5,6]:
h = exp p w c q
where
2 ue /2 [2 ue (1 n|| /nopt )2 + n ]
(24)