BINT 356 Winter 2013 K.

Gluck
UNIT

REVISED 08.Feb Preparation & Submissions

BINT 356 Winter 2013 Detailed Syllabus

Charles Eames stated Design is a plan for arranging elements in such a way as to best accomplish a particular purpose. Thus a detailed syllabus is a beautiful thing!
January 1 Course outline / Syllabus /Learning outcomes/ Expectations Fundamentals of the Interior Design Profession Career Opportunities in Interior Design 2 Attaining an Entry-Level Position Career Options and Preparation Work Experience Employment options, goal setting , getting and preparing for interviews Guest Speaker BMO via Franca Resume development Portfolio Development Design and Graphics Chapter 3 relevant sections Resume Draft 1 DUE Chapter 1,2

Chapter 4 Search, seek and select research project DUE

4 February 5

Working class: Design Portfolio & Resume Package Class re-purposed for Mayhew competition
Chapter 3 relevant sections

Guest faculty: Anna Stranks Professionalism ; Working in a Design Firm being an intern

Resume drafts returned in class. ONLY no show, no feedback Submit Portfolio Draft must be printed on 11x17 paper for feedback from KG/VVE MK to give e-crits in BINT 351

d Reading Week d
7 Interviews with industry guests Industry Interview Session Draft for Industry Review (Portfolio & Resume Pkg. in colour for presentation to guests. Chapter 4 FINAL submission of resume and portfolio pkg.

March

Professional Business Responsibilities and Legal Responsibilities

Professional Compensation, Administrative Practices, and Legal Responsibilities

Chapter 6

10

Enhancing Your Value: Client Relationship Skills

Chapter 7 relevant sections

11

Presentation skills

pp. 230-239 + supplemental materials

April

12

Enhancing Your Value: Project Management Skills

Chapter 8

13

Enhancing Your Value: Knowledge of the Total Design Process

Chapter 9

14

Attend Thesis Presentations for Peer review

Take home Exam DUE

Course Evaluation:
Search, seek and select research project 25% Resume & Portfolio Package 45% Industry Interview Session 15% Take home Exam Peer review of Thesis Presentations 5% Total 100%

10%

Unacceptable (Below 50%) Unacceptable 45% Skill levels are unsatisfactory. Submission does not demonstrate understanding of the skill sets taught in this course, specifically; work: is presented in a substandard fashion is poorly conceived, inaccurate or incomplete does not demonstrate research and process work does not express the design intent is poorly detailed does not meet minimal project requirements written work is not at an acceptable level for a degree program

Below Average (50% - 65%) Acceptable 65% - Below average 60% Much development is needed 55% Barely passing effort 50% Work is executed below the average level for this course, specifically: is poorly presented is inadequately conceived is poorly researched with inadequate process work does not express the design intent clearly or accurately is underdeveloped in detailing needs additional work in some areas to meet all the project requirements graphic presentation does not follow BID Graphic Standards written work is below average academic level and may not be referenced

Average (66% -79%) High Average 75% - Average 70% Some skill levels are developing well, but others need improvement. Work is executed at an average level for this course, specifically: is acceptably presented is adequately conceived would benefit from more careful research and more thorough process work generally expresses the design intent needs more attention to detail and diligent review of work by student, prior to submission meets most of the project requirements graphic presentation does consistently follow BID Graphic Standards written work is at an average academic level and may not be properly referenced

Above Average (80 89%) Excellent 85% - Proficient 80% Most skill levels are very good with some exceptions. Work is executed at a proficient level for this course, specifically: is neatly presented is well conceived demonstrates adequate research and process work expresses the design intent well is produced with competent detail meets project requirements with some exceptions graphic presentation mostly follows BID Graphic Standards written work is at a proficient academic level including APA referencing

Excellent (90%+) Exemplary 95% - Advanced 90% Skill levels are exceptional. Work is executed at an advanced level for this course, specifically: is professionally presented is creatively conceived demonstrates thorough research and process work clearly expresses the design intent is produced with careful attention to detail exceeds project requirements graphic presentation follows BID Graphic Standards precisely written work is at an advanced academic level including precise APA referencing