THE RAKOVSKY INTERROGATION

The Stalin purges were in full swing, and Rothschild agent Christian G. Rakovsky was
fighting for his life. His death sentence had already been pronounced. He basically said to
Stalin’s men: ‘. . . if you interview me tonight, you will not kill me." In light of
Rakovsky’s powerful connections, Stalin was intrigued enough to order his chief
interrogator, Gavriil G. Kusmin, to interview Rakovsky and see what he had to say.

Who was Rakovsky, and why was he fighting for his life?

Rakovsky was top level Communist, Freemason, and international Jew. Here is how
Communist Boss Leon Trotzky described Rakovsky in his autobiography, entitled, My
Life, An Attempt at an Autobiography:

Christian G. Rakovsky is, internationally, one of the best known figures in the
European Socialist movement. A Bulgarian by birth, ... he is a Roumanian subject by
dint of the Balkan map, a French physician by education, a Russian by connections,
by sympathies and literary work. He speaks all the Balkan and four European
languages; he has at various times played an active part in the inner workings of four
Socialist parties — the Bulgarian, Russian, French, and Roumanian — to become
eventually one of the leaders of the Soviet Federation, a founder of the Communist
Internationale, President of the Ukranian Soviet of People’s Commissaries, and the
diplomatic Soviet representative in England and France ... Rakovsky’s personal traits,
his broad international outlook, his profound nobility of character, have made him
particularly odious to Stalin, who personifies the exact opposite.

The Jewish Revolutionary, top Freemason, and top Communist operative who used the
name "Christian G. Rakovsky"

The above passage reveals a key aspect of reality from which we should take heart. The
idea pushed by some that the "conspirators" are invincible supermen is false. This idea
that we are fighting "omnipotent beings" has been one of the greatest weapons of the
forces of evil, spreading defeatism, paralysis, and paranoia amongst millions whose
constructive efforts could have already made a decisive difference. For instance, in the
interview, Rakovsky bitterly laments how badly things had gone for "them" since Trotzky
lost out to Stalin.

The age-old truth maintains: the more power they attain, the greater the intensity and
bitterness of the infighting amongst Satan’s top earthly agents. Notice Trotzky’s bitter and
obviously heartfelt vilification of Stalin in the last sentence of his description about
Rakovsky.

In fact, Communist Stalin and Communist Trotzky had become bitter enemies. Trotzky
and Rakovsky represented the genteel, upper class wing of Judeo-Freemasonry. Stalin
and Kusmin represented the local, thug wing of Judeo-Freemasonry — and a fierce fight
had erupted between the two. By 1937 Stalin had caught on to the plot to overthrow him
— and just in time. He initiated the purges of 1938 to eliminate all the agents of the
international bankers (such as Rakovsky) who had been plotting to overthrow him.

Brief History of the Communist Takeover of Russia

The international bankers of Judeo-Masonry had been trying for over a century to
establish a land base to spread their Revolution. They had tried and failed n France with
the French Revolution in 1789. They failed in Russia in 1905, and perhaps elsewhere. By
1917, Stalin and other secret Communist Revolutionaries had worked their way up into
key positions in the Russian Czar’s secret police, waiting for the opportune moment to
betray and topple him. The Romanov family had ruled a Christian Russia for 500 years at
the time of the Communist takeover.

After the Czar Romanov had been overthrown in 1917, a Revolutionary named Kerensky
took over the apparatus of the Russian government with one purpose in mind: to turn it
over to Lenin as soon as possible. Kerensky was a "false opposition" leader who was only
pretending to be against Communism. He declared a "democratic republic," or some such
thing, to throw the Russian patriots off balance and buy time until the Communist agents
were all in place. During the interview in question, Rakovsky informs Kusmin and us,

"Believe me: despite the statues and mausoleum — Communism is indebted to

Kerensky much more than to Lenin."

Lenin had been given $10 million and sent into Russia as an agent of Jacob Schiff, the
Rothschilds and other banksters of Judeo-Masonry to consolidate Russia as the first land-
base from which the Permanent Revolution against Christianity would try to spread its
errors and influence across the world.

After Lenin arrived in Russia, at the prearranged moment, a few months later in 1917,
Kerensky relinquished the reigns of power and disappeared into the background,
immediately moving to the U.S.A. where he lived out his life in obscurity as a very
wealthy man. (A reminder: Communism was always nothing more and nothing less than
the police arm and terror apparatus of the Judeo-Masonic international bankers. There
was no shortage of money to reward Kerensky for so great a service to the Permanent
Revolution against Christianity.)

Once the government was in his hands, Lenin began the Communist reign of terror
against the Russian people.

The key connection between Lenin and the banksters had been Leon Trotzky, who had
married into the Top Judeo-Masonic mafia. Trotzky, another brilliant and capable Jewish
Revolutionary, had planned to succeed Lenin himself as the World Leader of
Communism.
But, as Rakovsky reveals in the interview under discussion, at the key moment when
Lenin was dying in 1922, Trotzky became gravely ill. Stalin did not hesitate, but seized
the moment to make himself the undisputed Ruler of Russia. Trotzky had to flee Russia
where he plotted against Stalin in exile. Many of Trotzky’s allies, including Rakovsky,
stayed behind and pretended to be Stalinists.

As the years progressed between 1922 and 1938, Stalin (the local thug faction)
progressively alienated the international banksters. As they saw it, (again as revealed by
Rakovsky in the interview) Stalin was sacrificing the interests of the International
Communist Revolution to concentrate on a more nationalist version of Communism in
Russian. As they saw it, Stalin had stolen the fruits of the 1917 Revolution from them and
was stifling the spread of Communism.

It was resolved to overthrow Stalin. But, as already stated Stalin was a step ahead of the
banker faction and arrested their key agents surrounding him (including Rakovsky). Now
he was purging them one by one, or in groups after public show trials.

It was in this atmosphere that Rakovsky, being held in prison and already sentenced to
death, pressed for an interview to try and save his life. Before getting to the interview
itself, let’s recap how the transcript was preserved for posterity. As author Deidre
Manifold informs us, the original is undoubtedly to be found in the Russian archives.

Working backwards along the chain of events, author George Knupffer, a "white" Russian
who had fled Russia at the time of the Communist Revolution spent many years tracking
down the document and then translating it into English. Knupffer understood the
importance of the Rakovsky interview — his whole life had been disrupted by the
Permanent Revolution against Christianity and its Communism arm. He had authored the
insightful book, The Struggle for World Power, which appeared in 1958. In that book, he
explains that he "deals with the whole problem of super-power and global enslavement
through the masters of both usury-Capitalism and terroristic Communism, which are both
tools of the same forces serving the same purposes."

His understanding of the key lever of power used by the Revolution against Christian
peoples was evident in the closing paragraph he wrote at the end of Red Symphony, the
title under which he published the Rakovsky interrogation in English:

"This [interview] should be essential reading for all who wish to know what is
happening and why, throughout the world, and also what alone can be done to stop the
conquests of the revolution: the power of monetary emission must be returned to
[Christian Rulers] everywhere. If that is not done in time, Communism will win."

Knupffer’s admonition has not been heeded yet, as today, the power to issue money in the
United States remains in the hands of the Revolution, i.e., in their private company the
Federal Reserve Bank — which operates largely in secret. It must be returned to
Congress, as the Constitution demands, and conducted in the light of day for all to see.
Back to the action: after WW II, Knupffer had heard about the existence of the Rakovsky
interview, finally tracking it down in Spain, where it had been published by the illustrious
Spanish patriot, Senor Don Mauricio Carlavilla under the title, La Lucha por el Poder
Mundial. Senor Carlavilla himself explains how he came into possession of the Rakovsky
interview:

“This is the result of a painstaking translation of several copybooks found on the body
of Dr. J. Landowsky in a hut on the Petrograd front (Leningrad) by a Spanish
volunteer.

He brought them to us. In view of the condition of the manuscripts, their restoration
was a long and tiring job, lasting several years. For a long time we were not sure if
they could be published. So extraordinary and unbelievable were his final disclosures
that we would never have dared to publish these memoirs if the persons and events
mentioned had not accorded fully with the facts. ... We answer fully and personally for
the veracity of the basic facts."

Who was Dr. Landowsky?

George Knupffer tells us about the man who had the courage to preserve the Rakovsky
interview, Dr. J. Landowsky, who was the man Stalin held prisoner for the very purpose
of translating such interrogations:

Dr. Landowsky was a Russianized Pole and lived in Russia. His father, a Colonel of the
Russian Imperial Army, was shot by the Bolsheviks during the 1917 revolution. The life
story of Dr. Landowsky is astonishing. He finished the Faculty of Medicine in Russia
before the Revolution and then studied two years at the Sorbonne in Paris, and he spoke
fluent French. He was interested in the effect of drugs on the human organism, to help
surgeons in operations. Being a talented doctor, he carried out experiments in this field
and achieved considerable results.

However, after the Revolution, all roads were closed to him. He lived with his family in
great need, earning a living by chance jobs. Not being able to publish learned papers in
his own name, he permitted a more fortunate colleague to publish them in his own name.

The all-seeing NKVD (secret police) became interested in these works and easily
discovered the real author. His specialty was very valuable to them. One day in 1936
there was a knock at the doctor’s door. He was invited to follow, and he was never again
allowed to rejoin his family. He was placed in the building of the chemical laboratory of
the NKVD near Moscow. He lived there and was forced to carry out various jobs ... he
was a witness at questionings, tortures and the most terrible happenings and crimes . . .
He knew and suffered much, especially as he was a decent and religious man. He had the
courage to keep notes of what he had seen and heard . . . hiding all this in the hollow legs
of his table in the chemical laboratory. So he lived until the Second World War. How he
came to Petrograd and how he was killed in not known."
So, because of his fluency in language and proficiency with administering drugs, Dr.
Landowsky had been made a prisoner by Stalin.

Dr. Landowsky is Ordered toPrepare Rakovsky for Questioning

Just before the Rakovsky interview, fresh from witnessing tortures and terrors at Stalin’s
secret police headquarters, Landowsky eventually is able to write the following:

“I returned to the laboratory. My nervous system bothered me and I prescribed myself

complete rest. I am in bed almost the whole day. Here I am quite alone for already four
days. Gavriil (Kusmin, Stalin’s chief interrogator) inquired about me every day. He has
to reckon my condition. At the mere thought that they could send me to the Lubianka
(Moscow HQ of the secret police) to be present at a new scene of terror I become
excited and tremble. I am ashamed of belonging to the human race. How low have
people fallen! How low have I fallen!”

Months later he would write:

"Only after several months, when summer began, was I able calmly and simply to set
out all that I had seen, disgusting, vicious, evil . . ."

It was at this point that Dr. Landowsky was informed by Kusmin (Stalin’s chief
interrogator) that he was to prep Rakovsky for an interview, and that he was to be present
at it himself. The doctor protested and tried to be excused, but Kusmin assured him this
time would be different than the others.

Kusmin ordered Landowsky to examine Rakovsky and prescribe a diet to strengthen him
for the interview. Landowsky was also to be present at the interview and slip something
like sodium pentothal into Rakovsky’s alcoholic beverage to loosen him up and put him
in an optimistic mood during the questioning. The session was to be tape recorded.
Kusmin and Rakovsky would talk in French so that the guards present couldn’t
understand. Then Dr. Landowsky was to translate the French into Russian so that Stalin
himself could read the transcript.

Dr. Landowsky describes his trip to Rakovsky’s cell:

“After lunch I went to visit Rakovsky. He was kept locked up in one room of the
ground floor and guarded by one man who did not take his eyes off him. Of furniture
there was one small table, a narrow bed . . . When I entered Rakovsky was sitting. He
immediately got up. He looked at me closely and I read in his face doubt and, it
seemed, also fright . . .

"I told the guard to leave and bring me a chair . . . He was about 50 years old. He was
a man of medium height, bald in front, and a large, fleshy nose. In youth his face was
probably pleasant. His facial outlines were not typically Semitic, but his origin was
nevertheless clear. Once upon a time he was probably quite fat, but not now, and his
skin hung everywhere, while his face and neck were like a burst balloon, with the air
let out. The usual dinner at the Lubianka [prison] was apparently too strict a diet for
the former Ambassador in Paris.” ...

Dr. Landowsky then relates his chat with the patient and the diet he prescribes to
strengthen Rakovsky for the interview.

Dr. Landowsky again:

“We prepared for the meeting with Rakovsky at midnight. Its ‘friendly’ character was
stressed in all details. The room was well warmed, there was a fire in the fire-place,
soft lighting, a small and well-chosen supper, good wines ... "As for a lovers meeting"
observed Gavriil [Kusman]. I was to assist. My chief responsibility was to give the
prisoner the drug in such a manner that he would not notice it. For this purpose the
drinks had been placed as if by chance near me, and I shall have to pour out the wine
... Three large arm-chairs were placed before the fire ... It had already struck midnight
when they brought the prisoner to us. ...

The conversation began with banalities . . . it is clear that Rakovsky is an expert

conversationalist. His speech is exact, elegant and even decorative. He is apparently
very erudite.”

After the banalities, and some initial sparring, Kusmin warned Rakovsky that he’d better
give them the straight truth and something worthwhile if he hoped to spare his "already
lost life." The serious interview began.

The conversation under discussion takes up about 56 single spaced pages, and All These
Things will return to this interview again and again in the issues ahead — as it is jam-
packed with explosive insights into the minds of those who run the Permanent Revolution
against Christianity. But now let us turn to the relevant points for this article.

Rakovsky explains that the reason for the attempt to overthrow Stalin was that the
international bankers (who Rakovsky refuses to identify by pretending ignorance of their
names, only referring to the top bankers as "they" and "them") were furious with Stalin
for his "bonapartism." This meant that, just as Napoleon Bonaparte had diverted the
French Revolution from its original goal and stolen it from the Rothschild banker faction
who had helped him up to power, Stalin had now done the same thing to the Communist
Revolution of 1917. Both men tried to become "top dogs" and throw off the bankers who
had financed them to power.

Napoleon Bonaparte was helped to power by the Jewish bankers, then and then tried to
overthrow them, frustrating the direction of the French Revolution (1789) as intended by
the Ruling Elite of Judeo-Masonry; Napoleon was exiled to St. Helena.
The bankers eventually revenged themselves against Napoleon by exiling him to the
island of St. Helena, but only after he set back the plans of the Permanent Revolution for
decades.

The banksters likewise looked at Stalin as having stolen the energy of the Communist
Revolution in Russia and kept it primarily a Russian phenomenon, instead of spreading it
to all of Europe more quickly as was the original intent.

Unable to arrange an internal coup against Stalin by the late 1920s, the banksters were
considering what options were available to oust Stalin by an external attack. Rakovsky
explains that, looking around Europe, there was no country that could hope to muster the
munitions and will to attack Stalinist Russia — except Germany under the right leader.

Rakovsky explained how Germany had been deliberately saddled with impossible debt
and other conditions at Versailles after World War I, with the hope that in time the
Germans in desperation would turn to Communism. But, he said, "thanks to the existence
of Stalin at the head of the USSR and the Internationale, the [Communist Revolution] in
Germany did not succeed." The top bankers than waited "in expectation that meanwhile
the [Ed: Trotzkyite Communists, i.e. the banker’s agents like Rakovsky himself] would
come to power in Russia ... but that, too, did not happen."

By the late 1920’s the bankers realized that a path was opening to finance the rising
leader in Germany who was threatening openly in his speeches to rid Europe of
Communism.

Rakovsky explains,

“On the horizon of a hungry Germany there sparkled the meteor of Hitler. A pair of
penetrating eyes fixed their attention on it. The world was witness to his lightning rise.
I shall not say that all of it was the work of our hands, no. His rise, uninterruptedly
increasing in extent, took place as the result of the Revolutionary-Communist economy
of Versailles ... But even more was needed: In 1929, when the National-Socialist Party
began to experience a crisis of growth and it had insufficient financial resources,
"They" sent their [front man] there ... In direct negotiations with Hitler "they" agreed
as to the financing of the National Socialist Party, and the latter received in a couple of
years millions of dollars, sent to it from Wall Street, and millions of marks from
German financiers through Schacht; the upkeep of the S.A. and S.S. and also the
financing of the elections which took place, which gave Hitler power, are done on the
Dollars and Marks sent by "Them."

We must pause here to remark that Rakovsky’s assertions that "They" financed Hitler was
confirmed many years later, and almost a decade after the Rakovsky interview appeared
in English in 1968 through the independent research efforts of James Poole in Who
Financed Hitler and Dr. Anthony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler.
Also, Otto Strasser, who was competing with Hitler to lead Germany in the 1920s,
confirms in Douglas Reed’s book about Strasser, Prisoner of Ottawa (which appeared in
the early 1950s), that circa 1929 Strasser’s faction was overwhelmed by Hitler, who
seemed to suddenly have unlimited funds at his disposal. Hitler then sought to kill
Strasser (after having already killed Strasser’s brother who had been one of Hitler’s key
assistants in the Nazi Party). Strasser then fled Germany and ended up in Canada. Even
after WW II, while hundreds of former Nazi’s were allowed to assume government posts
in post-war Germany, "They" never allowed Strasser to return to his home country. The
bankers liked Hitler because, like Stalin, he showed every indication of being a ruthless
cutthroat. Strasser was a patriot.

Hitler Also Double Crosses "Them"

Next, Rakovsky explains to a somewhat bewildered Kusmin that Hitler, like Stalin, also
tried to throw off the Rothschild bankers after he attained power. Furthermore, Hitler had
now become more dangerous to the Top Insiders than Stalin, because he was issuing his
own money, which was the ultimate disaster for the Rothschild bankers. Rakovsky
explains that the bankers were not even using the newspapers they owned in the west to
attack Hitler for issuing his own money, because they didn’t want to call attention to it for
fear that other states would get the same idea.

Now the Punchline: Rakovsky Suggests to Kusmin the Hitler-Stalin Pact

Rakovsky finally comes to the punchline. He tells Kusmin that the Rothschild bankers are
so desperate to rid the landscape of Hitler, that they are willing to put their feud with
Stalin on hold, and make an alliance with him against Hitler.

Rakovsky knows that Stalin is always hurting for many kinds of material goods and
resources. He tells Kusmin that, if Stalin wants help from "Them" again, he can win favor
by putting out feelers to Hitler for a Hitler-Stalin pact, a part of which will consist of a
joint invasion and partitioning of Poland.

At this point Rakovsky explains to Kusmin, how his boss Stalin can suddenly get all
kinds of help from the United States, and from many other unexpected sources, if he puts
out feelers for a Hitler-Stalin pact to divide up Poland.

Kusmin expresses some doubt about the power, or perhaps even the existence, of "them"
— at which juncture Rakovsky becomes threatening (quite extraordinary for a prisoner
facing the death penalty):

“Well, if you do not want to believe that ‘They’ are able to achieve that which they had
already achieved, then prepare to observe an invasion of the USSR and liquidation of
Stalin within a year. You think this is a miracle or an accident, well then prepare to see
and experience that.”
Kusmin then asks him what conditions would accompany such help from "Them."
Rakovsky speaks confidently:

“This is not difficult to assume. The first condition will be the ending of the executions
of the Communists, that means the Trotzkyists (i.e. Rakovsky), as you call them. . . .
There will be mutual concessions for mutual help ... You will see for example the
paradoxical phenomenon that a whole crowd of people, enemies of Stalin, will help
him ... There will appear influential persons at all levels of society, even very high
ones, who will help [Stalin] ... Have you understood me?”

Rakovsky explains that when Hitler takes the bait and invades Poland, that will provide a
pretext for the democracies to declare war on Hitler, thus hopefully knocking Hitler out
without a German attack on Russia. (In fact, Hitler realized what was happening when the
entire western press, including that of the USA, England, and France started beating the
war drums against Germany after the invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939, but said
nothing when Stalin did the same thing a short time later. Hitler shortly thereafter
attacked Stalin in what he hoped would be a pre-emptive strike..)

Rakovsky summarized this way:

“Here is a scheme: 1) A pact with Hitler for the division between us of ... Poland; 2)
Hitler will accept . . .; 3) The democracies will attack Hitler and not Stalin; they will
tell the people that although both are guilty of aggression and partition, but strategical
and logical reasons force them to defeat them one by one: first Hitler and then Stalin.”

Rakovsky further intimated that in the confusion of the war, "They" would allow Stalin to
take over Europe. (In fact, Stalin was allowed to take over half of Europe after World War
II. Eisenhower stopped the Allied troops against Patton’s objections to allow Stalin to
take the portion of Europe that he was being allotted.)

At this point, Kusmin, says that Rakovsky’s proposals are all nice sounding theory, but
that Stalin would need some proof.

“Kusmin: But the matter is urgent, and urgent not for us, but for you, Rakovsky.

Rakovsky: For me?

Kusmin: Yes, for you. Remember that your trial will take place very soon. I do not
know, but I think it will not be risky to assume that if all that had been discussed here
were to interest the Kremlin, then it must interest them before you appear before the
tribunal: that would be for you a decisive matter. ... The most important thing is to get
proofs that you spoke the truth, and to do this not during a period of several weeks, but
during several days. I think that if you were to succeed in this, then I could nearly give
you fairly solid assurance concerning the possibility of saving your life . . . In the
contrary case I answer for nothing.
Rakovsky: In the end I shall take the risk. Do you know if Davis is at present in
Moscow? Yes, [Roosevelt’s new] Ambassador of the United States. ... Only an
exceptional situation gives me the right, as I see it, to make use of an official
intermediary.”

The interrogation had begun at midnight, Moscow time, on January 26, 1938. It finally
ended 6 hours later, at 6 A.M. in the morning.

Dr. Landowsky said he walked back to his cell feeling as if the adults had pulled back the
curtain to let a child see the way the world really works. He said he felt like he had seen
an "x-ray" of the Revolution.

Kusmin would go to Stalin, and then to the U.S. Ambassador Davis, who confirmed
everything that Rakovsky had said. As Knuppfer notes, Rakovsky was obviously one of
"them" who was privy to the inside global strategies.

Later on, Dr. Landowsky recorded what Kusmin told him:

“Do you remember the conversation with Rakovsky ... Do you know that he was not
condemned to death? Well knowing all this you need not be surprised that Comrade
Stalin had thought it to be wise to try that apparently so unlikely plan .”

The London Times carried the story about the sparing of Rakovsky on March 12, 1938
with the headline: The Prosecutor’s demands: Death for all but Two.

Part of the article read as follows, sent by a correspondent of the Times who was at the
trials in Moscow:

"Under the pitiless glare of six arc lamps, the prisoners filed into court today to hear
Vyshinsky’s closing speech for the prosecution, which ended with a demand for the
death penalty for all save Bessanoff and Rakovsky . . ."

The Rakovsky Interrogated Provided Stalin the Plan which led directly to the Beginning
of World War II

Let’s hear from Deidre Manifold in Towards World Government: New World Order,
regarding the timing of the Rakovsky interview in relation to the strange "unknown" light
in the sky:

“Now more than fifty years later, the world media keeps up the illusion that Hitler was
solely responsible for starting World War II. While plans were in motion to bring about
the war by one means or another, the [Rakovsky Interview shows] beyond a shadow of
a doubt that the war was triggered by the proposals set out by Rakovsky and accepted
by Stalin. In return for the Plan, Rakovsky managed to save his life.”
As is now history, Stalin accepted Rakovsky’s idea because he was badly in need of aid.
Hitler, in turn, fell for the bait, and invaded Poland in early September, 1939. As
Rakovsky had predicted, England and France declared war on Hitler immediately, and
World War II, which would bring death to 50 million people, was underway.

17 months after Rakovsky’s words were heard, accepted, and acted upon — World War II
was a reality.