The time has come for Science to discard the bad science theory of evolution The Theory of Evolution

has not been established as absolute scientific fact.The starting point and the end point of the alleged long slow process of Evolution has never been observed 100% in it's entirety from start to finish by any reputable or reliable scientist nor has any reputable or reliable scientist identified and meticulously mapped in minute scientific detail any of the alleged evolutionary stages as they allegedly occurred and provided any plausible explanation for such alleged changes within minutes of such alleged evolution change. Evolutionists have failed to provide such scientific evidence in a blatant breach of Scientific rotocol and they have the audacity to provide bad science theories! poor scientific arguments! biased opinions " con#ecture in a vain attempt to try and authenticate and validate their wea$ scientific arguments to support the bad science theory of evolution. The %aws of Scientific Evidence cannot be suspended at will at the whim of evolutionists who are &uic$ to paint a bad picture of anyone that &uestions their thesis of evolution that blatantly omits '...the observation! identification! description! experimental investigation! and theoretical explanation ...' of the so called phenomena of evolution. (s Evolution a so called '..)ig *at %ie..'+ ,e loo$ at the scandals of The -ave .an! The iltdown .an! the /ebras$a .an and The /eandrathal .an etc and we see how some desperate evolutionists resorted to blatant scientific fraud to try and validate and authenticate the bad science theory of evolution. The time has come for Science to discard the bad science theory of evolution as a simplistic science theory that fails to provide an authentic explanation of 'The 0rigin of Species' of all original living organisms... Evolution is a bad science theory that incorrectly assumes that billions of years ago! some vague and obscure " unseen unicellular organism emerged from some alleged ancient primordial soup by some unexplained phenomena. Evolutionists would appear to believe that this so called common ancestor of all $nown species came into existence by some so called common chemical process that they allegedly refer to as

abiogenesis and they also appear to believe that the said common ancestor had the intelligence and the ability to assemble it's own 1/2 -01ES " 30TE(/S etc before it even existed as a living organism..4 /ow does that remind you of some of those '5once upon a time bedtime fairy tale stories54'. Evolutionists alleged that this so called common ancestor of all species apparently possessed super intelligence to conduct high speed super intelligent calculations to perform precise and exact genetic engineering experiments to re6arrange it's 1/2 -01ES into a self6replicating format of a diverse range of species in such a manner that each new species could only reproduce and bring forth species that had the same 1/2 -01ES as the 1/2 -01ES of the parents of such new species.. /ow if that don't sound li$e science fiction from some )oo$ of Science *iction *airy Tales! then 7uac$ Science has brainwashed you to allegedly believe that one day don$eys will have horns and pigs will fly etc5 Science is defined as '..The observation! identification! description! experimental investigation! and theoretical explanation of phenomena.'. The Theory of evolution fails to meet any of the above criteria in so far as there are no proper scientific records that meticulously and accurately record any of the alleged evolutionary stages from ST23T to *(/(S8. (n addition to the above! in the absence of proper scientific records of any alleged 0)SE392T(0/S etc about Evolution! it would appear that evolution is a fairy tale in so far as the time frame proposed by The *airy Tale Theory of Evolution. To date Evolutionists have failed to provide proper scientific answers to simple basic scientific &uestions to authenticate and validate The Theory of Evolution.Evolutionists assert that the alleged '5long slow process of evolution was observed over a long period of time5'. 2ccording to simple logic any thin$ing person $nows that -harles 1arwin was not born to witness and 0)SE39E and 3E-031 any of the alleged Evolutionary Stages from ST23T to *(/(S8 and so we can rule out -harles 1arwin as a reputable and reliable Scientific 0bserver of the alleged long slow process of evolution.

,e can also rule out any so called scientists who is ignorant enough to state that they have observed the long slow process of evolution from ST23T to *(/(S8. (n brief! we can safely say that The Theory of Evolution does not have any reliable and reputable scientific observers who allegedly observed the alleged long slow process of evolution from start to finish. ,e re#ect the assertions and con#ectures of &uac$ scientists who ma$e up fairy tale stories that cannot and will not stand the scrutiny of basic scientific tests.,hen Evolutionists allege that Evolution was observed it is good to as$ them these simple &uestions: 7.1; 0bserved by who + 7.<; ,hat time frame are you loo$ing at + 7.=; ,hen did the alleged process of Evolution allegedly start + 7.>;-an you (/TE3*2-E such alleged 0)SE392T(0/S with any so called 2-T?2% meticulous " accurate Scientific 3ecord of 'Evolution'+ 7.@; 2re there any 3eliable -omplete " 2ccurate Scientific 3ecords of The alleged long slow process of the alleged evolution