MONGE, RONY VLADIMIR

A205-503-682
.b. cg8Ymcu 0H8cc
Executive Offce fr Immigration Review
BcnrJcf ImmignlicnAppcnls
Occcf/hcClcrk
JJLcch0rgIikc, vi/c2JJJ
Iu/sChurch, |rgtntu 2JJJJ
OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel - KRO
18201 SW 12th St.
GLADES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
P.O. BOX 39
Miami, FL 33194
MOOREHAVEN, FL 33471
Name: MONGE, RONY VLADIMIR A 205-503-682
Date of this notice: 10/3/2013
Enclosed is a copy of the Boad's decision and order in the above-refrenced case.
Enclosure
|De MeDDet9:
NU8DB, MUgD L.
8UBy, HDgBI
LDB, 8lI|C|8 P.
Sincerely,
DC t O
Donna Car
Chief Clerk
5chuckc
U9etIeD: LDCKBl
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
Cite as: Rony Vladimir Monge, A205 503 682 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)
.b. 6g8tm6R 00866
Executive Ofce |Imigation Review
Decision of the Boad of Imigation Appeals
Falls Chuch,Virginia ZZ41
File: A205 503 682 - Miai, FL Date:
V .. 0l$
7
In re: RONY VLADIMIR MONGE
REMOVAL PROCEEDIGS
APPEAL
ON BEHALF OF RSPONDENT: Pro se
ON BEHALF OF DHS: Margait I. Cimadevilla
Assistant Chief Counsel
CHARGE:
Notice: Sec. 212(a)(6)(A)(i), I&N Act [8 U.S
.
C
. ) l 182(a)(6)(A)(i)] -
Present without being admitted or paoled
Sec. 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I), I&N Act [8 U.S.C.
) l 182(a)(7)(A)(i
)(I)] -
Immigrant
-
no valid immigant visa or enty document
Sec. 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), I&N Act [8 U.S
.C. { l 182(a)(2)(A)(i
)(I)] -
Crime involving moral turitude
APPLICATION: Remad
The respondent, a native ad citizen of El Salvador, has appealed the Immigration Judge's
decision dated May , 2013, which ordered him removed fom the United States. The
Depament of Homeland Security ("DHS") ha argued that the Immigration Judge's decision
should be afred. The record will be remanded to the Imigration Cou fr fher
proceedings.
We review fndings of fct, including the Immigration Judge's determination of credibility,
under a clealy eroneous standad. 8 C.F.R.
)
1003.l(d)(3)(i). We review all other issues,
including whether the paies have met the relevant buden of proof, and issues of discretion,
under a de novo standard. C.F.R. { 1003.l(d)(3)(ii).
The issue befre us on appea is whether the respondent was accorded his due process nt
to a fll ad tuhearing. 08 0IOhm V. O, 821 F.2d 1547, 1550 (11th Cir. 1987). As best
that ca be sumised fom the respondent's pro se fling, he appeas to ague, inter alia, that he
was not on notice that his frst heaing was also his fnal heaing, that he was not given enough
time to represent himself ad comprehend his circustances, including his ties in te United
We note that the record befre us does not indicate that the respondent waived his rght to
appeal, d suggested by the DHS in its brief (DHS's Br. at 2 D, S00 Tr. at 8).
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Rony Vladimir Monge, A205 503 682 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)
' A205 503 682
States and his far of retuing to El Salvador, and that his convictions were based on
"questionable infactions."
Upon review of the record, we conclude that fher proceedings in this case are appropriate
in view of the specifc circumstances of this case. During te respondent's one ad only
immigation heang on May 14, 2013, the respondent opted to represent himself, and admited
that he is residing in the United States as an immigrat witout proper documents (Tr. at 2-3).
When the Immigration Judge asked the respondent if there is any reason why he can ot ret to
El Salvador, the respondent indicated that he fared he will be killed by gangs (Tr. at 5-6).
Although the Immigation Judge infrmed the respondent that he can make an application
explaining his fa of retng to El Salvador, this statement was preceded and fllowed by the
Immigration Judge's suggestion to the respondent that the heaing was "not the proper frum" to
address his fa and that his claim was probably not suffcient enough, to which the respondent
responded with, "Well, if not, then just depor me" (Tr. at 6).
The transcript shows tat inquiry into the respondent's expressed fea was cursory and
minimal. Tere is also a concer that the Immigration Judge's comments may have had an
unintended efect of dissuading the respondent fom submiting an application fr relief fom
removal based on his fa of returing to El Salvador, in contravention of the regulations in
8 C.F.R. { 1240.ll(c)(l). Accordingly, to ensure that the respondent has a reasonable
opportity to present evidence on his behalf, we will remand the record to te Immigration
Court fr fher proceedings. The fllowing order shall be entered.
ORER: Te record is remanded to the Immigration Court fr fher proceedings.
FOR J BOARD
2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Rony Vladimir Monge, A205 503 682 (BIA Oct. 3, 2013)
T1Z1
_

``
_
I1b 1O1h1h h

U
_
t.
.
U ..
f
'

, t :
-
: ,". .
_
:
.
I*

, _

-
` \,

.-:.
.'.
t

-

_ , . . .
.
.
:
'
.

:
/

.
;

,r a ' * ;
. :-
. '"
,
ttout:ca 0UT
1820I R. 13

mz,

P 33l94
;
/

.
.
.

:.
,
.
,
:' ,

'
`
" ' .
J CD0 Wttcz o

,
,
,
,
:1
ae N.: Ao8 1-67 ,

2W R&W R0CDO0S

N038. VzxIR
Reso

denr
..

=

Lwtt10 J
This 1a a aot tm -.i e:a Enteied 00 1 'J
)is nem zandm 1 ao1o1yov tb convenience of th Qt1 0+
_

CD

.
prooee no' houldbeappealed or.reopened, tb oral deeis D WLJJ come

tbO fcx og1n1on

1n tbo aBe


: : . :
.


.
|


Te re.sponcnt

.as ordered x=

6 from

CD0 ced CBCOB CO

"or:" 1

t .
.
d.crti:e
_
t%

:_


-
+


_J Xndeoc'e appliction tor volutar departure was deied.ad
: poncent

WB ozdqxOd xoWO=d

co O , JD rho

ate:t:ve VO

`
:
.

.

,
|

RcaQmwt'6 ppJ1ct:on.torvo1mnap .deparure: Wao 9rated mri1
t
'pon::posting. B D00 in tc Q C of $

.
WLth BD JLeXnRCB

ordr of reoal vo
-

gdm',B.@g\CL10u for:



'
| J

yJv,e (
'
, g:ated1; | . !mod( . }wJrhmam
. .
| : |

'
' 1choJdng otveava: vaa ( )yrced ( )donJed ( ` lV1 tbmaw

I 1 aIvem
, SOOt1on WB ( )gcted |eed ( }=itbxam.

,
_
J

MI4

+?f
:
rv1

Wd .-u-- z6)` , W8 I

. r

rd ( 4

`
. .
,
.
., .. ( . IW1tbdxw

.
.
,
, . .. . ,,
.
,

, ,

: -
-
. . , ,

' :

-
. - ; . ,
:
:.:
,
\

:
.

_
.
,
.

'

4r =p\r::



.. ::

: .

_
; .
.
,

` - Y
[ caellation under
,
`oeccin 240Ab!(1) W0 .( ) gnted: , . ( c1ed .
|
_ ( )

withdaw. J1 gced, c

a o:de:e tht che resonent

be issued
:
a1 Prpriate

doents. necessU to. g1Vo

etteo to. B Od0 , +

_
.. "
J, :accllatiOi wdoX Boot1on z+0Ab) |2) W88 .-
:
| )gtod ( duL4:,
.
.

.
.

1tmm. It g:antd it s 'ordered. a t respondent b=

Isued
+
BJI
.
appropriated .doument$ mccaoag t
.
g1 VO effect to t1 o0X-
Adjuernenc oz_S.tatus

mder.Section

wa: ( ) granted ( ) denied

(

vvhe
-
,

1L
,
grated

\

ta ozdd tt the respndet be Lau=d

aJ1 epptpviateddocmcoc neoeeoap co giv
.
e .effct CO CDB orde2.
l Rspgndentsapplictio"of ( .")

wi.tholdig'f zonoI ( ) detem8L of

remQval. uder Atil_e

TT

Ottcaeveot:ea Agaist. Totue W

,
| ]
. _' _
l

=0

( I d'eried ( )

: withraw..
.
t
RoaQndnc,W

0UO ozeocLndod wdex OCC2OD 246
8ospmot.8Wttod to wo Tited Statea aa &

ucil

.
B conition o aiae,

eonent. 4& CO ia

nd.

|
, , _

_
Roug0deu1

Jo:ingly filed
_
trJv1ousyIw applicat:on aftr proper
WJO#+ , . :
xecponenc N6 dv1eed,Of
"
t
.
i: e; J

ieLcacLondzc zotiomp :elief

ta1me co
.
'

appear ordore JD TDB TenLgacLoo idie ,.: orl deci

|. PCod1 g

exee~Jmted

:. .:

.
[ J 0tba:







0to: , Z4 .
+
App U0 :
\ .
.
,
.

`'

.
'
:':4:
:'

.
: _

.
.
a ':_;. `

`
-
_
.

' ..
.


-

`
+
r
,

__
. *
;..
'
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t

&

R
e
f
u
g
e
e

A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e

C
e
n
t
e
r

|

w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t