What Is The Importance Of Research Study?

Research is important when conducted correctly because it helps us to understand and possibly even solve existing or possible problems in the world. This could be anything from social issues to medical breakthroughs. Governments carry out research all of the time in order to come to conclusions about policies and strategies. They will often choose experts in the particular field to go out and carry out indepth research to help them out. Without this research and knowledge, it would be difficult to make a change in the world. It would also mean that changes wouldn't be fully considered which could result in bigger problems in the long run. If a problem is evident, for example gun crime, it is essential to understand what has caused the problem and why people continue to take part in such illegal activity even though they know it is fundamentally wrong. Research will aim to answer these questions so that informed decisions can be made about what strategies will help. In order for research to be valid a lot of time, effort and money have to be injected into the project. The problem is that most people aren't patient or willing enough to put in the effort. Without taking research seriously, results can be hugely flawed resulting in a worse scenario than the original problem. Even huge global companies with massive budgets do not put enough effort into their research. One example of this is a company specializing in beauty products who use a sample of less than 100 (which isn't enough to be globally representative) and advertise for people to test their product in places like fashion magazines (resulting in a sample of a very similar demographic). These results are flawed due to them not taking the research seriously enough

What Is The Importance Of Research Methodology?

The importance of research methodology is that different research methods are compatible with different situations, and therefore it is important to know which method is best suitable for use with a particular hypothesis or question. In fact, if an unsuitable research method is used, it could render the research useless. Research methods are a mix of concepts and ideas utilized to determine through neutral observation and analysis the truth of a situation.

What is research? Research is simply the act of taking action to find out information.

What are research methods? A research method is one particular way in which you can verify or discover a set of data.

What ways are there to conduct research? Ultimately there are two forms of research; qualitative and quantitative, all types of research can be categorized under these headings. Qualitative research will yield more specific and in-depth results while quantitative research will give a more general picture, but perhaps on a larger scale. The answer is in

their names, quantitative deals with numbers, while qualitative refers to the quality of data.

Can you give an example of qualitative and quantitative research? Surveys are commonly used in quantitative research, this is where a sample of people are asked their age, gender and any other relevant demographic information, along with a series of questions. It can then be determined what age groups answered which questions and whether there is any pattern. An example of qualitative research could be interviewing an expert in a particular field of study. The information garnered from the expert is likely to feature more in-depth information than you would get by simply asking them to fill out a questionnaire.

Which is best? It all depends on the task at hand, and that is the point of establishing the best and most relevant research methodology. Most disciplines will use a mixture of both methods, for instance, market researchers will use surveys and focus groups to determine demand for a product or service.

What Is The Importance Of Hypothesis In Research Process?

The research process begins and ends with the hypothesis. It is core to the entire procedure and, therefore, is of the utmost importance. A hypothesis can be formulated in several ways yet it always performs the basic function of predicting the final outcome of the investigation. The hypothesis usually occurs after inductive reasoning, in which the researcher performs a series of observations in order to form a theory. This hypothesis is then part of the first stage of the research process, of which there are 10 phases: Turn your ideas into a research question. Review the literature. Design the study and develop your method(s). Writing your research proposal. Issues about funding. Obtain ethical and trust approval. Collect and collate the data. Analyze the data and interpret findings. Implications of your research for clinical practice. Report on the study and disseminate the findings. A hypothesis ensures the entire research process remains scientific and reliable, following the principles of deduction. The hypothetico-deductive model was first proposed by Karl Popper who suggested that theories about the world should come first and these should be used to generate hypothesis which can be falsified by the empirical data produced by observations and experiments.

Though hypotheses are essential during the research process, it can produce complications with regards to probability, significance and Type I -Type II errors. A Type I error occurs when p value is too large and the null hypothesis is falsely rejected and the research hypothesis is falsely accepted. A Type II error occurs when the researcher falsely accepts the null hypothesis and falsely rejects the research hypothesis as p value is too small. To confirm, a null hypothesis is only used with statistics and claims there is no variation or difference between variables.

Why Are Assumptions And Hypothesis Important In Research

Because of this hypothesis and assumption we can find a result

Why Statistics Is Important To A Research?

Research is usually conducted into a theory or circumstance to try and prove fact or reach a conclusion on a subject. The study of the theory, material or discovery aims to find out more about the subject examined, to gain greater understanding of the matter at hand.

Why are statistics used? Statistics are most often used in research as they tend to prove or give information on the subject being researched. The statistical evidence in research is key to making a conclusion of proving a theory. Without proven statistical evidence it is hard for research to be more than just a list of theories - statistics provide evidence that back up the subject and conclusion of the research, therefore making the research more important and poignant.

Examples of statistical research A survey could be a good example of research that is done to gain statistics on a subject. For example, if a theory or statement is made that says 'more people buy apple than oranges' then a survey could be conducted to find out if this statement is true or not. By asking people questions, and recording their answers, you will then be left with statistical evidence that will either support or deny the statement made. In this example, if you asked 100 people whether they would rather buy an apple or an orange and 70 people said that they would rather buy an apple, then you have proved the statement to be true. The statistics would tell you that 70%, or seven out of 10 people, would rather buy an apple than an orange, making the above statement correct. Without these statistics you would not be able to prove the statement and it would be difficult to argue the truth of the statement. Statistics bring proof and clarity to research.

What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Experimental Method?

The experimental method provides general data, causal information and makes statistical analysis possible. In addition same experiment can be replicated on another subject o situation being studied. The disadvantage is that it does not provide individual information.

There are many advantages and disadvantages of experimental research. The advantages and disadvantages in any research are usually subjective as one cannot claim that an advantage in one experiment will also be an advantage in another experiment. Experimental research is seen as true research by many scientists. This is where there are different versions of the same situation and each time the experiment is done, one variable is different. This will show what the differences are in the reactions of the subjects and also allow the scientist to work out what they feel is the best and therefore the deciding factor in the experiment results. There are some people who feel that the human input is a disadvantage in these studies as humans do always have their own thoughts and can manipulate the results. There is also another thought that testing on humans is also a disadvantage as you cannot tell whether their answers or reactions are true or a show for the experiment. Advantages of experimental research.

Insight into methods of instruction.

Researcher has control and ability to change experiment if the answers are inconclusive, this allows for less time wasting in experiments.

Humans perform other kinds of experiments anyway so the human input should not be an issue. Disadvantages of experimental research.

Uses casual relationships that may be bias.

Scientist manipulates values so they may not be making a completely objective experiment.

People can be influenced by what they see around them and may give answers that they think the researcher wants to hear rather than how they think and feel on a subject.

Although there are many different ways that experimental research can be looked at, the subjects should not show any difference in reactions as they do in other kinds of research and many scientists see this as something that should not be classed as an advantage or a disadvantage

Describe The Role Of Statistics In The Research Process Using The Wheel Of Science As A Framework Explain How Statistics Link Theory With Research?
The wheel of science maintains that a theory lead to a hypothesis which in turn leads to a series of observations, which allow an empirical generalization to be made, which in turn alters the hypothesis, therefore 'turning' the wheel once more. The wheel stands between induction and deduction and is what statistics are all about. Statistics is the organizing and interpretation of data. If this is derived from a scientific experiment, it can be shown to fit within the wheel of science in the following ways: Theory. All theories will be untested or tested. Where they are tested, the statistical results of the theory can be evaluated to see if the results will fall within the expected range. Hypothesis. Any hypothesis can be supported by statistical analysis of previously tested hypotheses that will bear out the results of the experiment. This can be helpful if you consider an ancient hypothesis that gold can be created from lead. Statistically, the hypothesis has never stood up to examination. Observations. Statistics can, to some degree, predict what may or may not be happening in any given experiment. As such, careful statistical analysis of what is happening in the experiment can support the observations by providing a guide as to what is occurring. Empirical Deduction. Once the data from the experiment has been assembled, it can be analyzed statistically to help produce the necessary deduction. Since an experiment should be graduated in its results, the statistical deduction can be examined in detail with the various statistical models.

What Are Some Advantages And Disadvantages Of Descriptive Research?

Descriptive research gives researchers the opportunity to use both quantitative and qualitative data in order to find data and characteristics about the population or phenomenon that is being studied. Using descriptive research has both its advantages and disadvantages. Researchers can focus on these strengths and weaknesses in order to implement a research design that can account for them. The advantages of descriptive research include data collection and life experiences, while the method can be disadvantageous in the sense of confidentiality and objectivity and error. The data collection for descriptive research presents a number of advantages as it can provide a very multifaceted approach. Data can include case, studies, observation or surveys and give several angles on the information. For example, within descriptive research surveys can give statistical information about an event as well as give an idea about how people experienced the event. Another advantage of descriptive research is the unique data collection form of case studies. These case studies can be collected from individuals personal accounts or from written data such as newspaper reports. This data collection allows descriptive research to provide an insight into life experiences in a way that other research methods cant. It can remove barriers of strict academic approaches so that researchers can witness how others experience an event. Confidentiality is a big disadvantage of descriptive research. Subjects that researchers are question may not always be truthful and instead will give answers that they feel that the researcher wants to hear. In interviews, participants may also refuse to answer any questions that they feel are too personal or difficult. Descriptive research also carried with it an observers paradox, if a participant knows that someone is observing them, they may change the way that they act. Subjectivity and error also play a disadvantageous role in descriptive research. Questions presented by a researcher are predetermined and prescriptive, while studies can contain errors. A researcher may choose what information to use and ignore data that does not conform to their hypothesis.

What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Correlation Research?

Correlation research is the method of sampling a population to ascertain a particular activity or to see whether a certain product is a popular one. Correlation is defined as a numerical relationship between two variables, and the research gives an indication as how the two variables affect each other in certain situations.

Advantages of correlation research method There are two ways that correlation research can be carried out. These are using experiments and completing surveys. The advantages of these methods are many and include the fact that a large number of individuals can be researched. Whether carrying out an experiment or completing surveys the number of individuals that can be researched is practically endless. The situation can be artificial and the answers provided will still be relevant using this type of research as the answers given in surveys will simply be the opinions of those surveyed. A survey is easy to complete and many people will take a few minutes out of

the day to complete them.

Disadvantages of correlation research method The main danger of this type of research is that the answers may be biased if a particular set of people is surveyed. This can lead to unbalanced answers and results, and the sample may not be a true representation. People who are being surveyed can only answer the questions that are on the survey and they cannot ask any questions about the cause and effect of the subjects being researched. People do not always answer questions truthfully on questionnaires and surveys; they sometimes answer the question in such a way as they feel might be required. All forms of research have advantages and disadvantages, and one is normally as useful as the others.

What Are The Major Differences Between Experimental Research And Co-relational Research?
In the general scenario, there exist a host of differences between the theory and implementation of experimental research and correlational research, which could be classified under the dimensions of general process, intended results and their respective sub-categories. In the case of general process, correlational research involves the observation of a researcher of a previously present situation nevertheless there is no intervention from the researcher. While in experimental research, the researcher manipulates the situation and checks the result of the initial manipulation. As for intended result, correlation research is concerned with the identification of associations between two or more factors while experimental research deals with the learning of how changes in one factor affect the other one. Correlational research has four types namely archival research, naturalistic observation, survey research and case study. As for experimental research, its only and exclusive type is experiment, which forms the entire gist of experimental research.

What are the methods of carrying out market research?

Qualitative research is about finding out not just what people think but why they think it. It is about getting people to talk about their opinions so you can understand their motivations and feelings.Face-to-face interviews and group discussions are the best way to get this kind of in-depth feedback. Qualitative research can be valuable when you are developing new products or coming up with new marketing initiatives and you want to test reactions and refine your approach.For instance, if you run a restaurant and you want to introduce a new lunch menu, you could invite a small group of local people to come and taste the food and give you feedback on your service and proposed pricing. This kind of exercise might only take a few hours and would not cost you much but it could provide you with important feedback and increase your chances of success.Alternatively, perhaps you are launching a new product. Before you go into production, it is vital to get your product into the hands of some members of your target market. Is it easy to use, does it do what it is supposed to, is the design appealing? Does it look as

if it will compare to existing competitive products in-store? Is the packaging working? Is the price right? This type of customer research almost always throws up one or two important issues that can then be ironed out before you launch your product.

A farmer decides to try out a new fertilizer on a test plot containing 10 stalks of corn. Before applying the fertilizer, he measures the height of each stalk. Two weeks later, he measures the stalks again, being careful to match each stalk's new height to its previous one. The stalks would have grown an average of 6 inches during that time even without the fertilizer. Did the fertilizer help? Use a significance level of 0.05. null hypothesis: H0: = 6 alternative hypothesis: Ha : > 6 Stalk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Before height 35.5 31.7 31.2 36.3 22.8 28.0 24.6 26.1 34.5 27.7 After height 45.3 36.0 38.6 44.7 31.4 33.5 28.8 35.8 42.9 35.0

Subtract each stalk's before height from its after height to get the change score for each stalk; then compute the mean and standard deviation of the change scores and insert these into the formula. The problem has n 1, or 10 1 = 9 degrees of freedom. The test is onetailed because you are asking only whether the fertilizer increases growth, not reduces it. The critical value from the t-table for t.05,9 is 1.833. Because the computed t-value of 2.098 is larger than 1.833, the null hypothesis can be rejected. The test has provided evidence that the fertilizer caused the corn to grow more than if it had not been fertilized. The amount of actual increase was not large (1.36 inches over normal growth), but it was statistically significant.

All data gathered will be compiled and tabularized to organize the Pre Intervention Blood glucose and Post Intervention Blood glucose of the ten female participants out of the regular faculty and staff of Western Mindano State University.

The statistic used were the mean (X), standard deviation (SD), and the T-test of difference.

A set of paired observations from a normal population This t-test compares one set of measurements with a second set from the same sample. It is often used to compare before and after scores in experiments to determine whether significant change has occurred.