2011 Cgse Annual Report

ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering
2011 ANNUAL REPORT
http://www.newcastle.edu.au/research-centre/cgse/
ENQUIRIES AND FURTHER INFORMATION

Laureate Professor Scott Sloan Director ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering The University of Newcastle Callaghan, NSW 2308 Australia T: + 61 4921 6059 F: + 61 4921 6991 E: Scott.Sloan@newcastle.edu.au
PARTNER ORGANISATIONS
PUBLICATION DETAILS
Design: RAEONTHELAMB Editor: Scott Sloan Assistant Editors: Kirstin Dunncliff Jim Hambleton Printing: ONA Print Graphics
TABLE OF CONTENTS
[06] MISSION STATEMENT [06] RESEARCH GOALS [07] DIRECTORS STATEMENT [10] RESEARCH TEAM [17] RHD STUDENTS [27] MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE [28] ADVISORY BOARD [29] OFFICIAL CENTRE LAUNCH [30] RESEARCH PROGRAMS [35] VISITORS AND COLLABORATION [40] PUBLICATIONS [48] PLENARY, KEYNOTE & INVITED LECTURES [49] RESEARCH SEMINARS [52] SELECTED ACHIEVEMENTS [55] EXTERNAL FUNDING AWARDED [58] SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS [81] ANNUAL WORKSHOP [82] WEBSITE [82] CONTRIBUTION TO THE NATIONAL BENEFIT [83] CENTRE PERFORMANCE
(30 JUNE 2011 31 DECEMBER 2011)
[86] FINANCIAL REPORT [91] FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS
MISSION STATEMENT
The Centre will pioneer new scientific approaches to geotechnical engineering design. This will underpin Australias energy and transport infrastructure, resulting in increased productivity and sustainability of the nations major export industries.
RESEARCH GOALS
Provide a national focus for geotechnical research by integrating the expertise of the key Australian geotechnical research groups into a single centre. This will ensure that new offshore and onshore geotechnologies can be developed in a coherent and unified fashion, as well as establish a critical research mass and allow cross-pollination between the strengths of the different nodes. Optimise the design of critical infrastructure by combining fundamental work in geotechnical science, cutting edge computational modelling, state of the art physical modelling and field testing to make the engineering of Australias infrastructure safer and more cost effective. Educate and train the next generation of geotechnical engineers and researchers. Collaborate with the offshore and onshore construction industry to ensure (i) a rapid uptake of geotechnologies and design practices and (ii) sustainability of the CGSE funding, post ARC support.
6 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report MISSION STATEMENT/RESEARCH GOALS
DIRECTORS STATEMENT
This is the first Annual Report for the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering (CGSE), a collaborative research centre that capitalises on the combined strengths of the Priority Research Centre for Geotechnical and Materials Modelling (CGMM) at The University of Newcastle, the Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems (COFS) at The University of Western Australia, and the Centre for Geotechnics and Railway Engineering (GRE) at The University of Wollongong. The Centre also includes two world-renowned partner investigators in Professor Harry Poulos from Coffey Geotechnics and Professor Vaughan Griffiths from the Colorado School of Mines. Industry sponsors of the Centres research are Coffey Geotechnics, Douglas Partners, and Advanced Geomechanics. The total Centre funding is approximately $23M over a seven year period. The Centre formally commenced operation at the end of June 2011 and much of our initial energy has thus been focused on recruiting key
personnel including Post-doctoral Researchers, a Business Manager, a Centre Administrator, as well as numerous research students. A comprehensive website has been established (http://www. newcastle.edu.au/research-centre/cgse/) which will continue to be expanded in the coming months. Two Centre workshops, attended by over 60 staff and research students, have served to launch collaborative research between the nodes in a major way. These workshops have been reinforced by staff exchanges and over a dozen key collaborative projects are now in full swing. With the support of the Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW and its Partner Organisations, the Centre will be establishing Australias first national soft soil testing site at Ballina NSW in 2012. A development application and environmental impact report for this site, totalling more than 160 pages, have been lodged with Ballina Shire Council for approval. Work on this national testing facility will commence as soon as approval is obtained, and it will serve as a national focal point for engaging the geotechnical industry in the science and
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report DIRECTORS STATEMENT
engineering of construction on soft soil. Key features of the national site at Ballina will be full-scale testing of embankments, advanced in situ and laboratory testing to characterise the soil, reduced-scale centrifuge modelling, and state-of-the-art numerical modelling to compare with observed behaviour. Once the embankments are built, an international prediction symposium will be organised, with some of the worlds leading geotechnical research groups and engineering firms being invited to participate. In line with the Centres focus on the development of advanced computational methods, a rack-mounted farm of high performance computer servers has been established at The University of Newcastle. This system is configured with sophisticated tools for code development, as well as a range of geotechnical software, and can be accessed remotely by all researchers in the Centre. The Centre aims to provide a national focus for geotechnical research by integrating the complementary expertise of three key Australian geotechnical research groups into a single unit. This will ensure that new offshore and onshore geotechnologies can be developed in a coherent and unified fashion, as well as establishing a critical research mass and cross-pollination between the strengths of the nodes. The Centre has four geotechnical science themes, each of which will be linked to advanced computational modelling, state-of-the-art physical modelling, laboratory testing, full-scale testing, and engineering applications. These fundamental themes are described in the diagram below. The first meeting of the Management Committee was held in February 2011, prior to the official commencement date of the Centre, with key personnel from all nodes coming together in Newcastle. Key topics discussed included the budget, recruitment of new staff, the initial focus themes for research,
GEOTECHNICAL SCIENCE
Geomaterial Science Behaviour of soft soils: structure, anisotropy, creep Mechanisms of damage & rate dependence Response through lifelong cyclic loading Ultra low stress soil mechanics, liquefaction, softening Micromechanics of cyclic deformation Multiphysics Modelling Multi-phase models for solid-to-fluid transitions Multiscale modelling, upscaling from discrete grains to a continuum Thermo-hydromechanical models Electro-osmotic consolidation Granular hydrodynamics Constitutive models for interfaces Moving Boundaries Large deformation FEA Soil-structurefluid interaction with moving interfaces Deep penetration, foundation uplift and anchor pullout Dynamic effective stress contact mechanics Simulation of intelligent penetrometry GeoRisk Stochastic limit analysis & FEA Stochastic wave-structuresoil interaction Stochastic site characterisation & reliabilitybased interpretation Stochastic modelling of fissured media Geohazards: quantifying the risk of failure
PHYSICAL MODELLING TECHNIQUES
Centrifuge: hybrid whole of life models O-tube: fluid-structure-soil interaction. Novel site investigation technologies
Optimisation and adaptive methods, Computational contact mechanics, Computational homogenisation
COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUES
Robust computational methods; analysis techniques & software packages
NEW TOOLS
Ground improvement for facilities on soft and problematic soils; Deepwater gas frontiers: pipelines, risers, foundations, floating systems; Foundations for renewable energy; Hazard assessment (geo-, metocean): landslides, structures, tunnels; Efficient infrastructure for heavy haul roads & rail.
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS
Direct design: in situ model tests, intelligent site characterisation
NEW TOOLS
Above: Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering fundamental science.
and implementation of collaboration between the nodes. This was followed up with regular meetings of the Management Committee via phone hook-ups. Lachlan Bates, formerly the laboratory manager for the Priority Research Centre for Geotechnical and Materials Modelling, was appointed to the position of Business Manager at Newcastle. His much awaited replacement, Michele Spadari, commenced duty in December 2011 which has allowed Lachlan to focus solely upon the Centres activities, particularly in relation to industry liaison, financial management, laboratory testing and experimental research work. The Newcastle node also welcomed Kirstin Dunncliff as Centre Administrator. Kirstin has taken on numerous administrative tasks relating to the effective operation of the Centre including financial management, development and maintenance of the website, organisation of the research seminar series, preparation of report and meeting documents, collection of data on outputs, and the arrangement of travel and accommodation for Centre staff and visitors. Centre researchers have had a very successful year on the funding front, obtaining a large ARC Infrastructure Equipment and Facilities grant from the ARC for a National Centrifuge Facility (a collaboration between UWA, Newcastle, Wollongong, Monash, Adelaide and Queensland) as well as a number of ARC Discovery and Linkage grants and industry projects which will be discussed in further detail later in this report. The achievements of individuals within the Centre are numerous and will be detailed elsewhere, but particular highlights include Scott Sloans invitation to deliver the 51st Rankine Lecture in London, Mark Randolphs election as a Fellow of the Royal Society, Mark Randolphs award of an ARC Discovery Outstanding Researcher Award (DORA), Buddhima Indraratnas election to a Fellowship of the Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, and David Whites award as the Early Career Scientist of the Year for Western Australia. In addition, two of our talented young staff, Dr Shanyong Wang and Dr Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn, were successful in obtaining 3-year ARC CoE Early Career Researcher Support Award(s) on the theme of Ground improvement methods for soft and problematic soils. Over the course of the coming months, we look forward to welcoming new research staff and students to the Centre who will help us pioneer new scientific approaches to the geotechnical design of Australias energy and transport infrastructure.
Scott Sloan FAA FTSE FIEAust Laureate Professor Scott Sloan ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering
RESEARCH TEAM
The CGSE combines two of the worlds leading geotechnical research groups, the Centre for Geotechnical and Materials Modelling at Newcastle led by Laureate Professor Scott Sloan, and the Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems at The University of Western Australia led by Professor Mark Cassidy. It also includes the highly influential Geotechnics and Railway Engineering Centre at The University of Wollongong, led by Professor Buddhima Indraratna, which has a worldwide reputation for its work on transport infrastructure. The list of participating researchers includes three Rankine Lecturers (Poulos, Randolph, Sloan), a Terzaghi Lecturer (Poulos), an ARC Laureate Fellow (Sloan), three ARC Future Fellows (Cassidy, White, Krabbenhoft), an ARC Federation Fellow (Randolph), four Fellows of the Australian Academy of Science (Poulos, Randolph, Sloan, Carter), six Fellows of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (Poulos, Randolph, Sloan, Carter, Cassidy, Indraratna), a Fellow of the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering (Randolph), and five E H Davis Memorial Lecturers (Poulos, Randolph, Sloan, Carter, Indraratna). These researchers, together with the other Chief Investigators, have been recipients of the highest awards possible in the field of geotechnical engineering. All the participating groups have extensive experience in managing large research projects and working closely with government and industry infrastructure firms.
10 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH TEAM
DIRECTOR
Laureate Professor
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
SCOTT SLOAN FAA FTSE
The University of Newcastle Winthrop Professor
MARK CASSIDY FTSE

The University of Western Australia
CHIEF INVESTIGATORS
Professor
JOHN CARTER AM AM FAA FTSE

The University of Newcastle
Professor
CHRISTOPHE GAUDIN
Professor
BUDDHIMA INDRARATNA FTSE

The University of Wollongong
Associate Professor
KRISTIAN KRABBENHOFT
Associate Professor
ANDREI LYAMIN
Associate Professor
RICHARD MERIFIELD
Winthrop Professor
MARK RANDOLPH FAA FBE FREng FTSE

Professor
DAICHAO SHENG
Professor
DAVID WHITE
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH TEAM
11
PARTNER INVESTIGATORS
Professor
HARRY POULOS AM, FAA, FTSE, Hon FIEAust, Dist MASCE

Coffey Geotechnics
Professor
D VAUGHAN GRIFFITHS
Colorado School of Mines
ASSOCIATES
Doctor
ANDREW ABBO
Associate Professor
BRITTA BIENEN
Assistant Professor
NATHALIE BOUKPETI
Assistant Professor
NOEL BOYLAN
Doctor
OLIVIER BUZZI
Professor
J ANTONIO H CARRARO
Assistant Professor
SCOTT DRAPER
Doctor
XIAOWEI FENG
Professor
STEPHEN FITYUS
Doctor
XUEYU GENG
12
Doctor
ANNA GIACOMINI
Professor
SUSAN GOURVENEC
Associate Professor
WEI-DONG GUO
Doctor
JAMES HAMBLETON
Assistant Professor
JAMES HENGESH
Doctor
MUHAMMAD SHAZZAD HOSSAIN

Doctor
JINSONG HUANG
Doctor
MD REZAUL KARIM
Doctor
MEHRDAD KIMIAEI
Doctor
GEORGE KOURETZIS
Doctor
XU LI
Doctor
XIANFENG LIU
13
Doctor
MAJIDREZA NAZEM
Doctor
SANJAY SHRAWAN NIMBALKAR

Associate Professor
CONLETH OLOUGHLIN
Doctor
CHOLACHAT RUJIKIATKAMJORN
WOJCIECH SOLOWSKI
Doctor
Doctor
SAMUEL STANIER
Professor
BORIS TARASOV
Doctor
KLAUS THOENI
Doctor
YINGHUI TIAN
Doctor
BRETT TURNER
Doctor
CHET VIGNES
Doctor
CRISTINA VULPE
14
Assistant Professor
DONG WANG
Doctor
SHANYONG WANG
CHAO YANG
Doctor
Doctor
HONGXIA ZHU
BUSINESS MANAGERS
Mr
LACHLAN BATES
Ms
LISA MELVIN
CENTRE ADMINISTRATORS
Ms
KIRSTIN DUNNCLIFF
Mrs
ROMA HAMLET
ACCOUNTS OFFICER
Mrs
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
MONICA MACKMAN
The University of Western Australia Mrs
MICHELLE GRANT
15
IT SUPPORT
Mr
JOSHUA KAUTTO
Mr
PETER TURNER
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
Mr
ALAN GRANT
Mr
MICHELE SPADARI
16
RHD STUDENTS
During 2011 the Centre actively recruited Research Higher Degree (RHD) students, both nationally and internationally. At The University of Newcastle, eight (8) offers were made and accepted with students to commence in 2012. There is one (1) domestic candidate and seven (7) international candidates who are currently going through the visa application process. Students have been aligned with one of the four major research themes and, where appropriate, will be supervised jointly across the nodes. At The University of Western Australia, since the beginning of the CGSE, three (3) new international PhD students have commenced. Three (3) offers were made at the end of 2011 and all are international candidates who are currently going through the visa application process. Another four (4) international students will be transferring from the Institute of Technology Sligo (Ireland) during 2012.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RHD STUDENTS
17
MS HANA ABU ZAHER
PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

Georemediation - the removal of fluoride from spent potliner (SPL) contaminated groundwater using calcite and zeolite Supervisors: Scott Sloan, Brett Turner
MR YOUSEF ANSARI

Evaluation of hydraulic conductivity characteristics of clays via piezocone dissipation tests Supervisors: Daichao Sheng, Scott Sloan, Richard Merifield, Majidreza Nazem
MR LACHLAN BATES
M Eng (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

Interpretation of in situ test results Supervisors: Stephen Fityus, Emoke Imra
MR GLEN BURTON

Mechanics of partially saturated soils Supervisors: Daichao Sheng, Scott Sloan, David Airey (Sydney)
MR MASON CRUMPTON

Computational methods in limit analysis Supervisors: Andrew Abbo, Scott Sloan, Andrei Lyamin, Jim Hambleton
18
MR RYAN DE CARTERET

The relationship between salinity and road pavements Supervisors: Stephen Fityus, Olivier Buzzi
MR SANTIRAM CHATTERJEE
PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

Modelling of pipeline seabed interactions Supervisors: Dave White, Mark Randolph
MR NING (STEVEN) CHENG

Dynamic pushover analysis of jack-up platforms using plasticity models for spudcan-soil interaction Supervisors: Mark Cassidy, Mehrdad Kimiaei
MR INDRANIL GUHA

Structural analysis of submarine pipelines under submarine slide and thermal loading Supervisors: Dave White, Mark Randolph
MR PAN HU

Numerical analysis on spudcan foundations with large penetration into multilayered soils Supervisors: Mark Cassidy, Dong Wang, Samuel Stanier
19
MS MINA KARDANI

Large deformation analysis in geomechanics using adaptive finite element methods Supervisors: Daichao Sheng, Scott Sloan Submitted in 2011, awarded in 2012
MR MOHAMMAD OMID KARDANI

Iterative methods for solving large sparse linear systems arising from computational plasticity problems Supervisors: Andrei Lyamin, Kristian Krabbenhoft
MR KOUROSH KIANFAR
PhD (Civil Engineering)

Implication of pre-fabricated vertical drains and vacuum preloading on viscoplastic behaviour of soft soils Supervisors: Buddhima Indraratna, Cholochat Rujikiatkmjorn
MR OMID KOHAN

Improving spudcan extraction from deep embedment in soft soils Supervisors: Mark Cassidy, Britta Bienen, Christophe Gaudin
MS VICKIE KONG

Jack-up reinstallation near existing spudcan footprint Supervisors: Mark Cassidy, Christophe Gaudin Submitted February 2012
20
MR XIAOJUN LI

The uplift capacity of mudmat foundations Supervisors: Mark Cassidy, Christophe Gaudin, Yinghui Tian
MR CHENGCAI LUO

On-bottom stability of submarine pipelines on mobile seabed Supervisors: Liang Cheng, Dave White, Mark Randolph
MR JIAJIE MA

Numerical modelling of submarine landslides and their impact on offshore infrastructure using the material point method (MPM) Supervisors: Mark Randolph, Dong Wang, Adam Wittek, Karol Miller
MRS DIVYA SALLIYIL KODAKKATTU MANA

Numerical and experimental investigation of offshore skirted foundations subjected to general loading Supervisors: Susan Gourvenec, Shazzad Hossain, Mark Randolph
MR MOHAMMAD SAEED MASOOMI

Dynamic soil-structure-water interaction Supervisors: Andrew Abbo, Majidreza Nazem, John Carter
21
MR JALAL MIRZADEHNIASAR

Probabilistic models for dynamic collapse of jacket offshore platforms under extreme waves Supervisors: Mehrdad Kimiaei, Mark Cassidy
MR MOHAMMAD HESAM MOAVENIAN

Dynamic soil structure interaction Supervisors: Majidreza Nazem, John Carter, Andrew Abbo
MR HENNING MOHR

Pipeline and seabed behavior under storm waves; numerical and physical modelling Supervisors: Dave White, Liang Cheng, Mark Randolph
MR MATHARAGE DARSHANA ANURADHA PERERA

Evaluation and reduction of time dependent (creep) settlement of reclamation soils improved using vertical drains and vacuum preloading Supervisors : Buddhima Indraratna, Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn
MR NATHAN PODLICH

The formulation of parallel algorithms for large-scale limit and shakedown analysis Supervisors: Andrei Lyamin, Scott Sloan, Andrew Abbo
22
MR HAMED MAHMOODZADEH POORNAKI

Intepretation of partially drained penetrometer tests with application to the design of spudcan foundations Supervisors: Mark Randolph, Noel Boylan, Mark Cassidy
MS LUCILE QUEAU

Fatigue design of steel catenary risers in the touchdown zone, considering nonlinear riser-soil interaction Supervisors: Mehrdad Kimiaei, Mark Randolph
MR LUDGER RAUSCH

Combined load capacity of shallow foundations for offshore energy production Supervisors: Britta Bienen, Mark Cassidy
MR AMIN RISMANCHIAN

Three dimensional modelling of pipeline buckling on soft clay Supervisors: Dave White, Mark Randolph
MR HASSAN SABETAMAL

Finite element algorithms for dynamic analysis of geotechnical problems Supervisors: Majidreza Nazem, Richard Merifield, Scott Sloan
23
MS SOMAYE SADEGHIAN

To be advised Supervisor: Mark Randolph
MR STEFANUS SAFINUS

Estimation of spudcan penetration resistance in layered soils directly from field penetrometer data and quantification of punch-through risk Supervisors: Shazzad Hossain, Mark Randolph, Mark Cassidy
MR FAUZAN SAHDI

Modelling of submarine slides and their impact on pipelines Supervisors: Dave White, Noel Boylan, Christophe Gaudin, Mark Randolph
MR FIRMAN RAYBAT SIAHAAN

Geonsynthetically-encapsulated granular column in soft soil improvement Supervisors: Buddhima Indraratna, Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn
MR HAMID TOHIDIFA

Effect of high speed train frequencies on the degradation of rail ballast upon cyclic densification Supervisors: Buddhima Indraratna, Song-Ping Zhu
24
MR CHANDRASIRI KUMARA WANAYALAGE

Load deformation behaviour of sediment infilled rock joints subjected to internal water flow Supervisors: Buddhima Indraratna, Song-Ping Zhu, Jan Nemcik
MR ZACH WESTGATE

Deep water pipeline embedment in soft clay due to dynamic lay processes Supervisors: Dave White, Mark Randolph
MR BEAU WHITNEY

Neotechnocs of Western Australia: paleoseismology of the Mt. Narryer fault zone Supervisors: James Hengesh, Dr Karl-Heinz Wyrwoll, Dave White
MR DANIEL WILSON

Stability of underground openings Supervisors: Scott Sloan, Andrew Abbo
MS YUE YAN

Novel methods for characterising pipe-soil interaction forces in situ in deep water Supervisors: Dave White, Mark Randolph
25
MR BASSEM YOUSSEF

Use of probability models in the integrated analysis of offshore pipelines Supervisors: Mark Cassidy, Yinghui Tian Submitted December 2011
MR XUE ZHANG

DFEM and its applications to large deformation problems in geomechanics Supervisors: Daichao Sheng, Kristian Krabbenhoft
MR YOUHU ZHANG

A force resultant footing model for spudcan foundations of offshore jack-up drilling rigs in soft clay Supervisors: Britta Bienen, Mark Cassidy
26
MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
The Management Committee is chaired by the Director, and its membership consists of the four research program leaders (Geomaterials Science, Multi-physics Modelling, Moving Boundary Problems, and Georisk) as well as the Newcastle node Business Manager. The Management Committee meets regularly via phone hook-up and at least twice a year face-to-face to allow each node to report on progress. The composition and responsibilities of the Management Committee are shown below: Scott Sloan Mark Cassidy Buddhima Indraratna Lachlan Bates John Carter Kristian Krabbenhoft Andrei Lyamin Mark Randolph Daichao Sheng David White Chair, Director of Centre, Newcastle node leader Deputy Director of Centre, UWA node leader, co-leader Georisk program Wollongong node leader, co-leader Geomaterial Science program Newcastle node Business Manager Co-leader Geomaterial Science program Co-leader Multiphysics Modelling program Co-leader Georisk program Co-leader Moving Boundary Problems program Co-leader Moving Boundary Problems program Co-leader Multiphysics Modelling program
TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Management Committee is responsible for the day-to-day running of the Centre, with its primary responsibilities being: 1. To formulate long term research strategies. 2. To review the progress of scientific objectives and adjust the scope of programs as needed. 3. To recruit research staff and research students. 4. To maintain budgetary targets.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
27
ADVISORY BOARD
CHAIR
Professor Scott Sloan FAA FTSE Director CGSE, The University of Newcastle
MEMBERS
Professor Ted Brown AC FREng FTSE Golders Associates Professor John Carter AM FAA FTSE Pro-Vice Chancellor, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle Winthrop Professor Mark Cassidy FTSE Deputy Director CGSE, The University of Western Australia Professor Buddhima Indraratna FTSE The University of Wollongong Professor Harry Poulos AM, FAA, FTSE, Hon FIEAust, Dist MASCE Senior Principal, Coffey Geotechnics Dr Marc Senders Principal Geotechnical Engineer, Woodside Energy Dr Phil Watson Director, Advanced Geomechanics Mr Will Wright Principal, Douglas Partners Dr Suzanne Lacasse MNAE, FCAE, FRSC, FNAE, FNAS, FEIC, FFAS, FRSN, FASCE Technical Director, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS
Professor Mike Calford DVC Research, The University of Newcastle Professor Robyn Owens DVC Research, The University of Western Australia Professor Judy Raper FTSE DVC Research, The University of Wollongong
TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Board will meet annually to discuss progress, budgets, future directions, strategic planning, technology transfer and additional funding opportunities from government bodies and industry. Important functions of the Advisory Board include: 1. Identification of key research problems in the geotechnical aspects of energy and transport infrastructure. 2. Advice on strategies for collaborating with industry-based partners on research, such as the joint preparation of large-scale Linkage Projects to the Australian Research Council. 3. Advice on the need for workshops and conferences that can be run under the umbrella of the Centre. 4. Advice on short courses for the further education of engineers. 5. Advice on suitable Key Performance Indicators for the Centre. 6. The use of Key Performance Indicators to drive behaviour.
28
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report ADVISORY BOARD
OFFICIAL CENTRE LAUNCH
The Newcastle node has received an internal grant of $500,000 to substantially refurbish offices where the Centre staff are situated. This work is scheduled to start in June and will cause some disruption as staff are required to relocate to temporary accommodation for a period of approximately three months. Once these renovations have been completed, an official launch of the Centre will be announced. It is anticipated that this will occur towards the end of 2012.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report OFFICIAL CENTRE LAUNCH
29
RESEARCH PROGRAMS
As described previously, research in the CGSE is focused broadly on the geotechnical aspects of energy and transport infrastructure and is composed of four main themes: Geomaterials Science, Multiphysics Modelling, Moving Boundary Problems, and Georisk. Each of these themes will be investigated comprehensively and capitalise on the world-leading research strengths of the Centre for Geotechnical and Materials Modelling at Newcastle (advanced computational methods and in situ testing), the Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems at The University of Western Australia (physical modelling and laboratory testing), and the Centre for Geotechnics and Railway Engineering at the The University of Wollongong (transportation geotechnics and ground improvement strategies for soft soils). Each of the four programs is now briefly described.
30
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH PROGRAMS
PROGRAM
GEOMATERIAL SCIENCE
OVERVIEW
The complexity in the behaviour of geomaterials is largely attributable to their granular nature and the presence of internal structure and multiple phases (solid, liquid and gas), as well as the marked influence of stress level and history. Key innovations, involving all the nodes, will include the formulation of new models for highly compressible soft soils, as found on seabeds and in estuarine deposits, as well as novel ground improvement methods such as vacuum consolidation. Challenging aspects to be pursued will include the unresolved problems of creep and thixotropy in geomaterials, the role of damage at the macro and micro-scales under static and cyclic loading, the fundamental mechanisms that govern rate-dependent behaviour, the mechanical response at ultra-low effective stresses (crossing the solid-fluid boundary and linking, for example, with scour), and the micromechanical origins of cyclic instability. These mechanisms govern the life-cycle response of heavy haul road pavements and cyclically-loaded foundations.
PROGRAM LEADERS
Professor Buddhima Indraratna and Professor John Carter
RESEARCH STAFF
Associate Professor Britta Bienen Assistant Professor Nathalie Boukpeti Assistant Professor Noel Boylan Associate Professor Wei-Dong Guo Dr James Hambleton Assistant Professor James Hengesh Dr Richard Kelly Associate Professor Kristian Krabbenhoft Associate Professor Richard Merifield Dr Majidreza Nazem Dr Sanjay Nimbalkar Winthrop Professor Mark Randolph Dr Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn Professor Daichao Sheng Laureate Professor Scott Sloan Professor Boris Tarasov Dr Geng Xueyu Dr Shanyong Wang Professor David White
RHD STUDENTS
Mr Yousef Ansari Mr Glen Burton Mr Kourush Kianfa Mr Matharage Darshana Anuradha Perera Mr Firman Raybat Siahaan Mr Hamid Tohidifar Mr Chandrasiri Kumara Wanayalage Mr Beau Whitney
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH PROGRAMS PROGRAM 1: GEOMATERIAL SCIENCE
31
PROGRAM
MULTIPHYSICS MODELLING
OVERVIEW
Engineering geotechnical design problems span material behaviour beyond the domain of conventional soil mechanics. This behaviour is often governed by multiphysical processes of conventional soil mechanics that operate at different length and time scales. Examples include submarine slides, where geomaterials at high water content may transfer into non-Newtonian fluids, and the influence of gas which can alter the response radically. Similarly, the frictional strength of soil-structure interfaces depends crucially on the contact micromechanics, varying by an order of magnitude with loading rate and accumulated displacement. Key innovations in this Program will address the multi-faceted behaviour of geomaterials, developing thermodynamically-sound multiphase models and efficient computational algorithms for solving complex problems including soft sea bed sediments and highly compressible estuarine clays, coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical problems including soft seabed sediments and highly compressible estuarine clays, coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical phenomena, and dissociation of gas hydrates. Sophisticated physical modelling, with visualisation of the deformation modes, will underpin the development of advanced computation algorithms for capturing the multi-phase material response. This synergy, which harnesses the strengths of the various geotechnical groups, is a major feature of the CGSE and used across all the research programs.
PROGRAM LEADERS
Professor David White and Associate Professor Kristian Krabbenhoft
RESEARCH STAFF
Associate Professor Britta Bienen Winthrop Professor Mark Cassidy Assistant Professor Scott Draper Professor Christophe Gaudin Professor Susan Gourvenec Assistant Professor James Hengesh Dr Jinsong Huang Winthrop Professor Mark Randolph Professor Daichao Sheng Dr Wojciech Solowski Dr Samuel Stanier Professor Boris Tarasov Associate Professor Mario Vicente Da Silva Assistant Professor Dong Wang
RHD STUDENTS
Mr Xiaojun Li Mr Chengcai Luo Mrs Divya Salliyil Kodakkattu Mana Mr Mohammad Saeed Masoomi Mr Henning Mohr Mr Xue Zhang
32
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH PROGRAMS PROGRAM 2: MULTIPHYSICS MODELLING
PROGRAM
MOVING BOUNDARY PROBLEMS
OVERVIEW
Current best-practice in geotechnical design is focused on stationary systems and constant material properties, aiming to attain negligible movement under working loads. However, many new infrastructure applications require an entirely new design paradigm which allows the geostructure to move large distances during its design life. Important examples include submarine pipelines on soft sediments, dynamic anchor installations in seabeds, installation of displacement piles, penetrometers used to measure geotechnical properties of soils, and foundations on soft clays. Key innovations in this Program include new analysis techniques that account for large deformations, softfluid-structure interaction, episodes of cyclic loading (and intervening recovery) and complicated interface behaviour. All three nodes in the CGSE have strong backgrounds in modelling complex boundary value problems, and will contribute to the development of novel techniques to simulate these phenomena. Moreover, the predictions from the advanced computational models will be compared against real behaviour observed in state-of-the-art physical modelling and field testing.
PROGRAM LEADERS
Professor Daichao Sheng and Winthrop Professor Mark Randolph
RESEARCH STAFF
Dr Andrew Abbo Associate Professor Britta Bienen Winthrop Professor Mark Cassidy Professor Christophe Gaudin Professor Susan Gourvenec Dr James Hambleton Dr Xu Li Dr Majid Nazem Laureate Professor Scott Sloan Dr Samuel Stanier Dr Yinghui Tian Assistant Professor Dong Wang Professor David White
RHD STUDENTS
Mr Santiram Chatterjee Mr Mason Crumpton Mr Indranil Guha Mr Pan Hu Mr Mohamman Omid Kardani Mr Jiajie Ma Mr Nathan Podlich Mr Hamed Mahmoodzadeh Poornaki Mr Amin Rismanchian Mr Fauzan Sahdi Mr Zach Westgate Mr Daniel Wilson Ms Yue Yan
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH PROGRAMS PROGRAM 3: MOVING BOUNDARY PROBLEMS
33
PROGRAM
GEORISK
OVERVIEW
In response to industry and community demands, the modelling and management of geotechnical risk has become a major issue in the design of all forms of physical infrastructure. Indeed, the natural variability in geological deposits, coupled with the existing uncertainty in loading conditions and limited on-site data, make this a very challenging aspect for government authorities and engineering practice. There is a compelling case to extend traditional deterministic design procedures to a stochastic framework. Key innovations in this Program include the development of new stochastic limit and shakedown analysis techniques to predict the load capacity of geostructures under static and cyclic loads, new methods for the stochastic modelling of wave-structure-soil interaction with application to offshore production rigs, and the risk-based prediction of slope stability and landslides and their effect on onshore and seabed infrastructure (such as pipelines). The Program will draw on the numerical modelling strengths of the Newcastle node, the centrifuge and constitutive modelling expertise of the UWA node, the extensive cyclic loading knowledge of the Wollongong node, and the probabilistic modelling expertise of PI Griffiths at Colorado to provide rational and complete treatment of this challenging topic.
PROGRAM LEADERS
Winthrop Professor Mark Cassidy and Associate Professor Andrei Lyamin
RESEARCH STAFF
Dr Andrew Abbo Associate Professor Britta Bienen Professor John Carter Assistant Professor Scott Draper Professor Vaughan Griffiths Dr Jinsong Huang Dr Mehrdad Kimiaei Dr Xu Li Winthrop Professor Mark Randolph Laureate Professor Scott Sloan Dr Yinghui Tian
RHD STUDENTS
Mr Ning (Steven) Cheng Mr Omid Kohan Ms Vickie Kong Mr Jalal Mirzadehniasar Ms Lucile Queau Mr Ludger Rausch Mr Stefanus Safinus Mr Bassem Youssef Mr Youhu Zhang
34
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH PROGRAMS PROGRAM 4: GEORISK
VISITORS AND COLLABORATION
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report VISITORS & COLLABORATION
35
Mr Alexandre Depouhon from the University of Minnesota and Universit de Lige, US/Belgium visited the CGSE and gave a talk on multi-scale modelling of materials and structures and discussed future research in drilling mechanics. Dr Konstantinos Georgiadis from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece visited the CGSE from September 2011 March 2012 and collaborated with Scott Sloan and Andrei Lyamin on semi-analytical and numerical limit analysis of deep foundations. Dr Mario Vicente da Silva from the University Nova of Lisbon, Portugal visited the Centre from September 2011 March 2012 and collaborated with Kristian Krabbenhoft and Andrei Lyamin on various research projects. Professor Lanru Jing from the Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden visited the CGSE during July 2011 to collaborate with Daichao Sheng on the hydromechanical behaviour of bentonite used in nuclear waste deposits. Professor Jinchun Chai from the Saga University, Japan visited the CGSE during March 2011 to collaborate with John Carter and Daichao Sheng on a range of research topics including the simulation and interpretation of piezocone penetration tests. Professor Gernot Beer from the Graz University of Technology, Austria visited the CGSE during July-August 2011 to collaborate with Scott Sloan on advanced numerical analysis of tunnelling using BEM/FEM. Professor Beer also provided a post-graduate course on nonlinear finite element analysis.
Professor Kentaro Yamamoto from Kagoshima University, Japan visited the CGSE during August and September 2011 to collaborate with Scott Sloan, Andrei Lyamin and Andrew Abbo on geotechnical stability analysis. Professor Yamamotos stay was supported by grants from the Japanese and Australian Academies of Science. Professor Yves Leroy from the Laboratoire de Geologie, CNRS, France visited the CGSE in July 2011 to collaborate with Kristian Krabbenhoft on research on limit analysis in structural geology. Professor Wei Wu from the Universitat fur Bodenkultur, Vienna visited the CGSE in June 2011 and presented his research on Hypoplastic constitutive model: stability and regularization. Associate Professor Itai Einav from the University of Sydney visited the CGSE in June 2011 to collaborate on modelling of flow and segregation of granular materials. James Hambleton also spent 4 days in Sydney in October 2011 to consolidate their research. Professor F Collin from the Liege University, Belgium visited the CGSE in July 2011 to collaborate with Olivier Buzzi on the THM coupling in underground fires. Dr James Hambleton visited Professor Vaughan Voller at the University of Minnesota, USA in July 2011 for research collaboration on the use of control volume finite elements in solid mechanics, especially computational limit analysis. Professor D Vaughan Griffiths is visiting the CGSE from September 2011 April 2012. Professor Griffiths is Professor of Civil Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines and is a Partner Investigator in the CGSE. Professor Griffiths is collaborating with several members in the Centre including Scott Sloan, Jinsong Huang, and Andrei Lyamin. Mr Ivo Raissakas, Masters Student, Graz University of Technology is visiting the CGSE from October until June 2012 to work on his master thesis. The work is about a comparison between Plaxis (strength reduction) and Lower and Upper bounds.
36
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report VISITORS & COLLABORATION
Dr Jonathan Black from the University of Sheffield, UK visited the CGSE during November 2011 for a few days to discuss his research with the CGSE researchers. Ms Adriane Boscardin from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA spent 4 weeks working in the CGSE laboratories during October November 2011 as part of the USAs NSF Collaborative Exchange Scheme on developing international protocols for offshore geohazards. Ms Fiona Boumard from the University of Toulon Var, France completed her internship at the CGSE during June August 2011 working with Scott Draper on the project wave energy resource assessment for a real site.
Professor Antonio Carraro from Colorado State University, USA visited the CGSE during August 2011 for a week, sharing his experiences with the geotechnical research lab he manages at Colorado State University. Antonio was offered a Professor position and started January 2012. Ms Jade Chung from the University of Maine, USA visited the CGSE during June July 2011 and September October 2011 to conduct centrifuge tests with Christophe Gaudin, Mark Cassidy and Melissa LandonMaynard on alternative foundations for floating wind turbines. Mr Nick Coleman from the University of Tasmania visited the CGSE during November 2011 February 2012. Nick was awarded a CGSE vacation scholarship and worked with Mark Cassidy and Vickie Kong on the installation of spudcan foundations next to existing footprints. Nick conducted a series of tests at various offsets from a footprint in sand. Mr Danqing (David) Dong from the University of Adelaide visited the CGSE during November 2011 February 2012. David was awarded a CGSE vacation scholarship and worked with Shazzad Hossain on the experimental investigation of perforation drilling for reinstallation of spudcan foundations close to existing footprints. Dr Xiaowei Feng from Tianjin University, China visited the CGSE during May 2010 May 2011 working with Susan Gourvenec, Mark Randolph and Christophe Gaudin on finite element analysis and centrifuge modelling of rectangular skirted foundations under general 6 degree of freedom loading, with the aim of developing a simplified design methodology for offshore manifolds and mudmats. Xiaowei started at the CGSE as a Lecturer (LRET Assistant Professor for Deepwater Engineering) in August 2011. Dr Dengfeng Fu from Tianjin University, China is visiting the CGSE during August 2011 July 2012 and working with Britta Bienen, Christophe Gaudin and Mark Cassidy on numerical analyses of hybrid skirted foundations. He is helping prepare for a series of PIV centrifuge tests scheduled for early 2012. Mr Chao Han from China is visiting the CGSE during November 2011 April 2012. Chaos visit started when he finished his Bachelor of Engineering degree from UWA. He is working with Dong Wang on research into the prediction of keying of suction embedded plate
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report VISITORS & COLLABORATION 37
anchor using analytical and numerical approaches. Dr Sascha Henke from Hamburg University of Technology, Germany visited the CGSE during March 2011 and November January 2012. Sascha provided the impetus to revive our pile driving hammer for the beam centrifuge. Together with Britta Bienen, Sascha performed an extensive series of tests to investigate plugging during the installation of various pile profiles into sand. Dr Esve Jacobsz from the University of Pretoria, South Africa visited the CGSE during January 2011. Esve was here for 3 days working with Dave White on the centrifuge. Mr Cody Jones from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA visited the CGSE during September October 2011. As part of the USAs National Science Foundation Collaborative Exchange Scheme on developing international protocols for offshore geohazards Cody spent 3 weeks in UWA laboratories. Mr Youngho Kim from Korea is visiting the CGSE during December 2011 December 2012 and is working with Shazzad Hossain on FE modelling of pull-out capacity of torpedo anchors. Mr Kai Xiang Koh from the University of Queensland visited the CGSE during November 2011 February 2012. Kai was awarded a CGSE vacation scholarship and is working with Shazzad Hossain on 3D FE modelling of torpedo anchor pull-out. Dr Melissa Landon-Maynard from the University of Maine, USA visited the CGSE during June 2011. A regular visitor to the CGSE, Melissa returned in 2011 with her
38 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report VISITORS & COLLABORATION
student Jade Chung to conduct centrifuge tests on alternative foundations for floating wind turbines. Dr Anjui Li from Deakin University visited the CGSE during December 2011. A UWA PhD graduate, Anjui returned for a short visit working with Mark Cassidy on research into probabilistic assessment of rock slope stability. Mr Xiaojun Li from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China visited the CGSE during August 2010 September 2011 and worked with Christophe Gaudin and Mark Cassidy on the uplift of deep water manifold foundations. He was awarded a postgraduate scholarship and started his PhD with the CGSE in October 2011. Dr Mohammad Mahdi Memarpour from Iran University of Technology, Iran visited the CGSE during May June 2011. Mohammad continued his research collaboration with Mehrdad Kimiaei from his previous visit to COFS in 2010, and spent a couple of weeks writing papers with Mehrdad. Dr David Masin from Charles University, Czech Republic visited the CGSE during January 2011. David spent a week at the CGSE working with Britta Bienen on hypoplasticity. He also conducted a short PhD course on fine-grained soil behaviour, fundamentals of hypoplasticity, modelling of fine- and course-grained soils using hypoplasticity, application of hypoplasticity in solving boundary value problems and demonstration of its use in the most common finite element software packages (PLAXIS, ABAQUS). Mr Joseph Newhouse from the UK visited the CGSE during September 2011 March 2012. After finishing his Degree, Joseph came to the CGSE to do research
work with Britta Bienen on predicting the foundation performance of offshore jack-up drilling rigs in intermediate soils. Professor Alexander (Sasha) Puzrin from ETH Zurich, Switzerland visited the CGSE during January February 2011. Sasha came to the CGSE on a Gledden Visiting Senior Fellowship and collaborated with Mark Randolph on advancing the fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of submarine landslides and their effect on offshore infrastructure. During his visit he also presented a public lecture on The leaning tower of St Moritz: geotechnical aspects of construction on a creeping landslide. Ms Christina Rudolph from Hamburg University of Technology, Germany visited the CGSE during October December 2011 for 7 weeks, working with Britta Bienen on cyclic lateral loading of piles. These centrifuge tests were performed with the application to offshore wind installations in mind. Mr Kouhei Sawada from the Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan visited the CGSE during March July 2011. Kouhei collaborated with Mark Randolph and Britta Bienen on research into pile raft design methods. Mr Sren Peder Hyldal Srensen from Aalborg Universty, Denmark visited the CGSE during November 2010 March 2011 working with Mark Randolph on different approaches to model the lateral response on monopoles for offshore wind farms, comparing finite element and beam column approaches and assessed how best to take account of scouring and the consequential reduction of stress in the soil at shallow depths around the piles. Dr Marco Uzielli from Georisk Engineering S.r.l., Italy visited the CGSE during July August 2011 working with Mark Cassidy, Yinghui Tian and Shazzad Hossain on establishing a portfolio of Georisk research in the CGSE. We hope that Marco will be a regular visitor with shorter visits anticipated for 2012. These will concentrate on probabilistic techniques for assessing the punchthrough potential of jack-up platforms and the variability of shallow foundation combined loading envelops. Ms Qiuchen Wei from Tianjin University, China is visiting the CGSE during November 2011 October 2012. Qiuchen is working with Mark Cassidy, Dong Wang, Yinghui Tian and Christophe Gaudin on the Australia-China Natural Gas Partnership grant entitled geotechnical solutions for engineering deep water gas fields. Quichen is investigating the change in yield surface size and shape with SEPLA geometry using the finite element method. Mr Feng (David) Yuan from Zhejiang University, China is visiting the CGSE during September 2011 September 2012. David is completing his PhD at Zhejiang University.
Mr Ehssan Zargar from Iran visited the CGSE during May 2011 February 2012. Ehssan is working with Mehrdad Kimiaei and Mark Randolph on dynamic analysis of steel catenary risers using soil-fluid-structure interaction models. Ehssan was recently awarded a PhD scholarship and will be shortly starting at the CGSE as a PhD student. Ms Fuyu Zhao visited the CGSE during November 2011 February 2012. Fuyu was awarded a CGSE vacation scholar and is working with Scott Draper on experiments related to scour from backfilled pipeline trenches. Mr Jingbin Zheng from China is visiting the CGSE during September 2011 August 2012. Jingbin is working with Shazzad Hossain on research on the estimation of spudcan penetration resistance in stratified soils directly from field penetrometer data and quantification of punch-through risk. Jingbin was recently awarded a postgraduate scholarship and will be starting his PhD with us soon.
Associate Professor Yajun Jiang from the School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China visited the CGSE as an Endeavour research fellow and collaborated with Buddhima Indraratna during April-September 2011 on the finite element simulation of high speed railways. Associate Professor Sujit Kumar Dash from the Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India visited the CGSE to work on the behaviour of ballast under impact loads during January-June 2011 under an Endeavour Fellowship award. Dr K S Vipin, Post Doctoral Fellow from the Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science (IISc) visited the CGSE on an Endeavour Fellowship and collaborated with Buddhima Indraratna during February-September 2011 on the cyclic behaviour of soil subjected to radial consolidation.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report VISITORS & COLLABORATION 39
PUBLICATIONS
BOOKS
Chai J, Carter JP (2011). Deformation Analysis in Soft Ground Improvement. Springer, Dordrecht. Indraratna B, Salim, W, Rujikiakamjorn C (2011). Advanced Rail Geotechnology Ballasted Track. Taylor & Francis, London. Randolph M, Gourevenec S (2011). Offshore Geotechnical Engineering. Taylor & Francis, London.
BOOK CHAPTERS
Clukey EC and Randolph MF (2011). The application of centrifuge model testing to deepwater geotechnical problems. Chapter 6 in Deepwater Foundations and Pipeline Geomechanics. McCarron WO (Ed). J Ross Publishing, Fort Lauderdale.
40
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PUBLICATIONS BOOKS/BOOK CHAPTERS
JOURNAL PAPERS
[A]
Abbo AJ, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW, Hambleton JP (2011). A C2 continuous approximation to the Mohr Coulomb yield surface. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 48(21), 3001-3010. Abdelrazaq A, Badelow F, Sung HK, Poulos HG (2011) Foundation design of the 151 story Incheon Tower in a reclamation area. Geot. Eng., Jnl. Of the SEAGS & AGSSEA, 42(2), 85-93. Acosta-Martinez HE, Gourvenec SM, Randolph MF (2011). Centrifuge study of capacity of a skirted foundation under eccentric transient and sustained uplift. Gotechnique, doi:10.1680/geot.9.P.027. Airey DW, Carter JP, Liu MD (2011). Sydney Soil Model. II: Experimental validation. International Journal of Geomechanics, 11(3), 225-238 Anbazhagan P, Indraratna B, Su L, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). Model track studies on fouled ballast using ground penetration radar and multichannel analysis of surface wave. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 74, 175184. Ansari Y, Merifield RS, Yamamoto H, Sheng D (2011). Numerical analysis of soilbags under compression and cyclic shear. Computers and Geotechnics, 38(5), 504-514.
Buzzi O, Giacomini A, Spadari M (2011). Laboratory investigation on high values of restitution coefficients. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. doi:10.1007/ s00603-011-0183-0.
[C]
Cassidy MJ (2011). Assessing the three-dimensional response of jack-up platforms in directional seas. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Special Issue on Energy Geotechnology,15(4), 623-634. Cassidy MJ (2011). Experimental observations of the penetration of spudcan footings in silt. Gotechnique, (in press). Chai JC , Agung PMA, Hino T, Igaya Y, Carter JP (2011). Estimating hydraulic conductivity from piezocone soundings. Gotechnique, 61(8), 699708.
[B]
Bienen B, Jan Dhrkop J, Grabe J, Randolph MF, White DJ (2011). The response of piles with wings to monotonic and cyclic lateral loading in sand. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000592. Boukpeti N, White DJ, Randolph MF, Low HE (2011). Strength of fine-grained soils at the solid-fluid transition. Gotechnique, (in press). Boukpeti N, White DJ, Randolph MF (2011). Analytical modelling of the steady flow of a submarine slide and consequent loading on a pipeline. Gotechnique, 62(2), 137-146. Buzzi O, Giacomini A, Fityus S (2011). Towards a dimensionless description of soil swelling behaviour. Gotechnique, 61(3), 271-277.
[D]
Doherty J, Fahey M (2011). Three dimensional finite element analysis of the direct simple shear test. Computers and Geotechnics, 38, 917924. Duenser C, Thoeni K, Riederer K, Lindner B, Beer G (2011). New developments of the boundary element method for underground constructions. International Journal of Geomechanics, (in press).
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PUBLICATIONS JOURNAL PAPERS [AD]
41
[F]
Fahey M, Helinksi M, Fourie A (2011). Development of specimen curing procedures that account for the influence of effective stress during curing on the strength of cemented mine backfill. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(2), 171-182. Fenton GA, Griffiths DV, Ojomo OO (2011). Consequence factors in the ultimate limit state design of shallow foundations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(2), 265-279. Fityus SG, Wells PA, Huang W (2011). Water content measurement in expansive soils using the neutron probe, Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34, 1-10. Fredlund DG, Sheng D, Zhao J (2011). Estimation of soil suction from the soil water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48, 186-198.
[G]
Gaudin C, Bienen B, Cassidy MJ (2011). Investigation of the potential of bottom water jetting to ease spudcan extraction in soft clay. Gotechnique. 61(12), 1043-1054. Gaudin C, Cassidy MJ, Bienen B, Hossain MS (2011). Recent contributions of geotechnical centrifuge modelling to the understanding of jack-up spudcan behaviour. Ocean Engineering, 38(7), 900-914. Geng XY, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). Analytical solutions for a single vertical drain with vacuum and time-dependent surcharge preloading in membrane and membraneless systems. International Journal of Geomechanics, (in press). Geng XY, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). The effectiveness of partially penetrating vertical drains under a combined surcharge and vacuum preloading, Canadian Geotechnical Journal , 48(6), 970-983. Gourvenec S, Barnett S (2011). Undrained failure envelope for skirted foundations under general loading. Gotechnique, 61(3), 263-270. Gourvenec S, Mana DSK (2011). Undrained vertical bearing capacity factors for shallow foundations. Gotechnique Letters, 1(4), 101-108. Govoni L, Gourvenec S, Gottardi G (2011). A centrifuge study on the effect of embedment on the drained response of shallow foundations under combined loading. Gotechnique, 61(12), 1055-1068. Griffiths DV, Huang J, deWolfe GF (2011). Numerical and analytical observations on long and infinite slopes. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 35(5), 569-585. Griffiths DV, Huang J, Fenton GA (2011). Probabilistic infinite slope analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 38(4), 577-584. Guruprasad B, Indraratna B, Nghiem LD, Regmi G (2011). A neural network approach to predict the performance of recycled concrete used in permeable reactive barriers for the treatment of acidic groundwater. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 44 (2), 199209.
[H]
Helinksi M, Fahey M, Fourie A (2011). Behaviour of cemented paste backfill in two mine stopes measurements and modelling. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137 (2), 171-182.
42 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PUBLICATIONS JOURNAL PAPERS [FH]
Hossain MS, Cassidy MJ, Baker R, Randolph MF (2011). Optimisation of perforation drilling for mitigating punch-through in multi-layered clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(11), 1658-1673. Hossain MS, Lehane BM, Hu Y, Gao Y (2011). Soil flow mechanisms around and between stiffeners of caissons during installation in clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, (in press). Hossain MS, Randolph MF, Saunier YN (2011). Spudcan deep penetration in multi-layered finegrained soils. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 11(3), 100-115. Hossain MS, Randolph MF (2011). Reply to Discussion by E.T.R. Dean on Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: centrifuge tests(original paper Gotechnique, 60(3),157170). Gotechnique, 61(1), 8587. Houlsby GT, Cassidy MJ (2011). A simplified mechanically based model for predicting partially drained behaviour of penetrometers and shallow foundations. Gotechnique Letters, 1(3), 65-69. Huang M, Liu Y, Sheng D (2011). Simulation of yielding and stress-stain behavior of shanghai soft clay, Computers and Geotechnics, 38, 341-353. Huang J, Griffiths DV, Wong SW (2011). Characterizing natural fracture permeability from mud loss data. SPE Journal, 16(1), 111-114.
Huang J, Griffiths DV, Wong SW (2011). Initiation pressure, location and orientation of hydraulic fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.11.014. Huang J, Griffiths DV, Wong SW (2011). In situ stress determination from inversion of hydraulic fracturing data. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 48(3), 476-481. Huang J, Griffiths DV (2011). Observations on FORM in a simple geomechanics example. Structural Safety, 33(1), 115-119. Huang M, Liu Y, Sheng D (2011). Simulation of yielding and stress-strain behavior of Shanghai soft clay. Computers and Geotechnics, 38, 341-353.
[I]
Indraratna B, Hussaini SKK, Vinod JS (2011). On the shear behavior of ballast-geosynthetic interfaces. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, (in press). Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Kelly R, Buys H (2011). Soft soil foundation improved by vacuum and surcharge loading. Ground Improvement, (in press). Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Balasubramaniam AS, McIntosh G (2011). Soft ground improvement via vertical drains and vacuum assisted preloading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, (in press).
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PUBLICATIONS JOURNAL PAPERS [HI]
43
[J]
Jiang AN, Wang SY, Tang SL (2011). Feedback analysis of tunnel construction using a hybrid arithmetic based on Support Vector Machine and Particle Swarm Optimisation. Automation in Construction, 20, 482-489.
[K]
Krost K, Gourvenec SM, White DJ (2011). Consolidation around partially-embedded submarine pipelines. Gotechnique, 61(2), 167-173. Indraratna B, Thakur PK, Vinod JS, Salim W (2011). A semi-empirical cyclic densification model for ballast incorporating particle breakage. International Journal of Geomechanics, (in press). Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Ameratunga J, Boyle P (2011). Performance and prediction of vacuum combined surcharge consolidation at Port of Brisbane. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(11), 1009-1018. Indraratna B, Nguyen VT, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). Assessing the potential of internal erosion and suffusion of granular soils. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(5), 550-554. Indraratna B, Su L, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). A new parameter for classification and evaluation of railway ballast fouling. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48 (2), 322-326. Indraratna B, Ngo NT, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballastunder various levels of fouling. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29, 311-322. Indraratna B, Nguyen VT, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). Assessing the potential of internal erosion and suffusion of granular soils. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(5), 550-554. Indraratna B, Su L, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). A new parameter for classification and evaluation of railway ballast fouling. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48, 322326. Indraratna B, Ngo NT, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). Behavior of geogrid-reinforced ballast under various levels of fouling. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 29 (3), 311-322.
[L]
Lee J, Randolph MF (2011). Penetrometer based assessment of spudcan penetration resistance. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(6), 587-596.
44
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PUBLICATIONS JOURNAL PAPERS [IL]
Leong Y-K, Teo J, Teh EJ, Smith J, Widjaja J, Lee JX, Fourie A, Fahey M, Chen R (2011). Controlling attractive interparticle forces via small anionic and cationic additives in kaolin clay slurries. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, doi:10.1016/j. cherd.2011.09.002. Li AJ, Merifield RS, Lyamin AV (2011). Effect of rock mass disturbance on the stability of rock slopes using the Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Computers and Geotechnics, 38(4), 546-558. Li LC, Tang CA, Wang SY (2011). Numerical investigation on fracture infilling and spacing in layered rocks subjected to hydro-mechanical loading. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, (in press). Liu M, Indraratna B (2011). General strength criterion for geometerials including anisotropic effect, International Journal of Geomechanics, 11(3), 251-262. Liu MD, Carter JP, Airey DW (2011). Sydney Soil Model. I: Theoretical formulation. International Journal of Geomechanics, 11(3), 211-224. Liu XL, Wang EZ, Wang SY, Wang SJ (2011). Bondedparticle modeling of fluid-driven fractures in granular materials. Philosophical Transactions A, (in press). Low HE, Landon MM, Randolph MF, DeGroot DJ (2011). Geotechnical characterisation and engineering properties of Burswood clay. Gotechnique, 61(7), 575591. Low HE, Randolph MF, Lunne T, Andersen KH, Sjursen MA (2011). Effect of soil characteristics on relative values of piezocone, T-bar and ball penetration resistances. Gotechnique, 61(8), 651-664. Lu MM, Xie KH, Wang SY (2011). Consolidation of vertical drain with depth-varying stress induced by multi-stage loading. Computers and Geotechnics, 38, 1096-1101. Lu MM, Xie KH, Wang SY, Li CX (2011). Analytical solution for the consolidation of a composite foundation reinforced by an impervious column with an arbitrary stress increment. International Journal of Geomechanics, (in press). Lunne T, Andersen KH, Low HE, Sjursen M, Li X, Randolph MF (2011). Guidelines for offshore in situ testing and interpretation in deep water soft soils, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(6), 543-556.
[M]
Mana DSK, Gourvenec SM, Randolph MF, Hossain MS (2011). Failure mechanisms of skirted foundations uplift & compression. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, (in press). Merifield RS (2011). The ultimate uplift capacity of multi-plate helical type anchors in undrained clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(7), 704-716. Merifield RS, Nguyen VQ (2011). Undrained bearing capacity of footings near slopes. Australian Geomechanics Journal, 46(1), 77-94. Menzies WT, Fenton GA, Lake CB , Griffiths DV (2011). A method to assess risk reduction when utilizing GCLs with compacted soil liners. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(1), 146-161.
[N]
Nimbalkar S, Indraratna B, Dash SK, Christie D (2011). Improved performance of railway ballast under impact loads using shock mats. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, (in press).
[O]
Osman AS, Randolph MF (2011). An analytical solution for the consolidation around a laterally loaded pile. International Journal of Geomechanics, (in press).
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PUBLICATIONS JOURNAL PAPERS [LO]
45
Shiau JS, Merifield RS, Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2011). Undrained stability of footings on slopes. International Journal of Geomechanics, 11(5), 381-390. Sheng D (2011). Review of fundamental principles in modelling unsaturated soil behaviour. Computers and Geotechnics, 38, 757-776. Sheng D, Augarde CE, Abbo AJ (2011). A fast algorithm for finding the first intersection with a nonconvex yield surface. Computers and Geotechnics, 38, 465-471. Sheng D, Zhou AN (2011). Coupling hydraulic with mechanical models for unsaturated soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48, 826-840. Sheng D, Zhou AN, Fredlund DG (2011). Shear strength criteria for unsaturated soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 29, 145-159. Solowski WT, Sloan SW (2011). Equivalent stress approach in modelling unsaturated soils. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods is Geomechanics, doi:10.1002/nag.1077. Spadari M, Giacomini A, Buzzi O, Hambleton J (2011). Prediction of the bullet effect for rockfall barriers: a scaling approach. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, doi:10.1007/s00603-011-0203-0. Spadari M, Giacomini A, Buzzi O, Fityus S, Giani GP (2011). In situ rock fall testing in New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.11.013. Suchoweska A, Merifield RS, Carter JP (2011). Prediction of underground cavity roof collapse using the Hoek-Brown failure criterion. Computers and Geotechnics, (in press).
[P]
Pantelidis L, Griffiths DV (2011). Stability assessment of slopes using different factoring strategies. Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Engineering, doi:10.1061/(ASCE) GT.1943-5606.0000678. Poulos HG, Small JC, Chow H (2011). Piled raft foundations for tall buildings. Geotechnical Engineering, Journal of the SEAGS & AGSSEA, 42(2), 78-84.
[R]
Randolph MF, Gaudin C, Gourvenec S, White DJ, Boylan N, Cassidy MJ (2011). Recent advances in offshore geotechnics for deepwater oil and gas developments. Ocean Engineering, 38(7), 818-834. Regmi G, Indraratna B, Nghiem LD, Banasiak L (2011). Evaluating waste concrete for the treatment of acid sulphate soil groundwater from coastal floodplains. Desalination and Water Treatment, 32(1-3), 126132. Regmi G, Indraratna B, Nghiem LD, Golab A, Guruprasad B (2011). Treatment of acidic groundwater in acid sulfate soil terrain using recycled concrete: column experiments. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 137(6), 433-443. Russell A, Buzzi O (2011). A fractal basis for soilwater characteristics curves with hydraulic hysteresis. Gotechnique, (in press).
[T]
Taiebat HA, Carter JP (2011). A failure surface for circular footings on cohesive soils - Discussion. Gotechnique, 61(7), 621622. Tarasov B, Randolph MF (2011). Superbrittleness of rocks and earthquake activity. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 48(6), 888-898. Tian Y, Cassidy MJ (2011). A pipe-soil interaction model incorporating large lateral displacements in calcareous sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(3), 279-287.
[S]
Shao W, Bouzerdoum A, Phung S L, Su L, Indraratna B, Rujikiatkamjorn C (2011). Automatic classification of ground penetrating radar signals for railway ballast assessment. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 49, 3961-3972.
46
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PUBLICATIONS JOURNAL PAPERS [PT]
Tian Y, Cassidy MJ (2011). Incorporating uplift in the analysis of shallowly embedded pipelines. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 40(1), 29-48. Tian Y, Cassidy MJ, Youssef BS (2011). Consideration for on-bottom stability of unburied pipelines using a dynamic fluid-structure-soil simulation finite element program. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 21(3), 1-8.
Yamamoto K, Lyamin AV, Wilson DW, Sloan SW, Abbo AJ (2011). Stability of a single tunnel in cohesivefrictional soil subjected to surcharge loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(12), 1841-1854. Yamamoto K, Lyamin AV, Wilson DW, Sloan SW, Abbo AJ (2011). Stability of a circular tunnel in cohesive-frictional soil subjected to surcharge loading. Computers and Geotechnics, 38(4), 504-514. Yan Y, White DJ, Randolph MF (2011). Penetration resistance and stiffness factors in uniform clay for hemispherical and toroidal penetrometers. International Journal of Geomechanics, 11(4), 263-275. Yang SQ, Yang DS, Jing HW, Li YH, Wang SY (2011). An experimental study of the fracture coalescence behaviour of brittle sandstone samples containing three fissures. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, (in press). Yang SQ, Jing HW, Wang SY, Pei JL (2011). Experimental study on the strength, deformability, failure behaviour and spatial acoustic emission distribution of red sandstone under triaxial compression. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, (in press).
[V]
Vlahos G, Cassidy MJ, Martin CM (2011). Numerical simulation of pushover tests on a model jack-up platform on clay. Gotechnique, 61(11), 947-960.
[W]
Wang D, Hu Y, Randolph MF (2011). Keying of rectangular plate anchors in normally consolidated clays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(12), 1244-1253. Wang SY, Chan D, Lam KC, Au SKA (2011). Laboratory study of static and dynamic compaction grouting in triaxial condition. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal, 6(1), 9-19. Wang SY, Sloan SW, Huang ML (2011). Numerical Study of Failure Mechanism of Serial and Parallel Rock Pillars. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 44(2), 179198. Wang SY, Sloan SW, Liu HY, Tang CA (2011). Numerical simulation of the rock fragmentation process induced by two drill bits subjected to static and dynamic (impact) loading. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 44(3), 317-332. White DJ, Dingle HRC (2011). The mechanism of steady friction between seabed pipelines and clay soils. Gotechnique, 61(12), 1035-1041. Wilson DW, Abbo AJ, Sloan SW, Lyamin AV (2011). Undrained stability of a circular tunnel where the shear strength increases linearly with depth. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(9), 1328-1342.
[Z]
Zhang C, White DJ, Randolph MF (2011). Centrifuge modelling of the cyclic lateral response of a rigid pile in soft clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(7), 717-729. Zhang Y, Bienen B, Cassidy MJ, Gourvenec S (2011). The undrained bearing capacity of a spudcan foundation under combined loading in soft clay. Marine Structures, 24(4), 459-477. Zhang Y, Bienen B, Cassidy MJ, Gourvenec S (2011). Undrained bearing capacity of deeply buried flat circular foundations under general loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000606. Zhou H, Randolph MF (2011). Effect of shaft on resistance of a ball penetrometer. Gotechnique, 61(11), 973-981. Zhu H, Randolph MF (2011). Numerical analysis of a cylinder moving through rate-dependent soils. Ocean Engineering, 38(7), 943-953.
[Y]
Yan Y, White DJ, Randolph MF (2011). Penetration resistance and stiffness factors in uniform clay for hemispherical and toroidal penetrometers. International Journal of Geomechanics, 11(4), 263-275.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PUBLICATIONS JOURNAL PAPERS [TZ]
47
PLENARY, KEYNOTE & INVITED LECTURES
Britta Bienen was invited to give a Guest Lecture at The Lloyds Register Educational Trust Collegium on carbon capture and sequestration in the ocean in Southampton. Mark Cassidy presented a Keynote Lecture on the Development and application of models for the stability analysis of Australias offshore pipelines at the 2011 Symposium on Coastal and Marine Geotechnics: Foundations for Trade. This was the 15th Annual Symposium organised by the Sydney Chapter of the Australian Geomechanics Society and was attended by over 140 industry practitioners and academics. Anna Giacomini delivered an Invited Paper on In situ experiments of rockfall in an open pit coal mine at Slope Stability 2011: International Symposium on Rock Slope Stability in Open Pit Mining and Civil Engineering, Vancouver, Canada. Buddhima Indraratna delivered a Keynote Lecture on Stabilisation of ballast and subgrade with geosynthetic grids and drains for rail infrastructureat the International Conference on Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, Perth Australia. Buddhima Indraratna delivered a Keynote Lecture on Physical and chemical ground improvement for sustainable transportation infrastructure under cyclic loads at the 3rd International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering for Disaster Mitigation and Rehabilitation, Semarang, Indonesia. Buddhima Indraratna delivered a Keynote Lecture on Implications of ballast breakage on ballasted railway track based on numerical modelling at the 13th International Conference of the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Melbourne Australia. Daichao Sheng delivered a Keynote Lecture on Constitutive modelling of unsaturated soils, at the 5th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Barcelona, Spain. Scott Sloan delivered the 51st Rankine Lecture on Geotechnical stability analysis at Imperial College, London, in March 2011. Scott Sloan delivered a Plenary Lecture on Accelerated convergence of Newton-Raphson method using a least squares approximation to the consistent tangent matrix at the 13th IACMAG Conference in Melbourne.
Scott Sloan delivered the Victor Milligan Distinguished Lecture on Geotechnical stability analysis at the Geo Engineering Research Centre, Queens University, Canada. Wojciech Solowski delivered an Invited Paper on Explicit stress integration with reduced drift for the Barcelona Basic Model of Unsaturated Soils at the 5th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Barcelona. Shanyong Wang delivered an Invited Paper on Numerical simulation of end restraint effects on triaxial strength of soil at the International Symposium on Geomechanics and Geotechnics: From Micro To Macro, Shanghai, China. David White delivered an Invited Lecture at the annual Offshore Technology Conference in Houston on The Western Australian LNG story A personal snapshot. Chao Yang delivered an Invited Paper on Constitutive model of unsaturated structured soils under cyclic loading at the 5th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Barcelona, Spain.
48
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report PLENARY, KEYNOTE & INVITED LECTURES
RESEARCH SEMINARS
[Fri 4 March]
UWA Dr Scott Draper UWA
Marine renewable energy
[Fri 18 March]
UWA Dr Sascha Henke Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
Plugging of open-ended pile profiles
[Mon 11 April]
Wollongong A/ Prof Antti Nurmikolu Director of Railway Track Research Tampere University of Technology, Finland
Finnish railways and railway track research at Tampere University of Technology
[Fri 15 April]
UWA Assistant Professor James Hengesh UWA
A tectonic influence on seafloor stability along Australias North West Shelf
[Fri 13 May]
Wollongong Prof G L Sivakumar Babu Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
Sustainability issues in pavement engineering
UWA
Vickie Kong PhD Candidate, UWA
Jack-up reinstallation near existing footprint

Youhu Zhang PhD student, UWA
Development of a VHM loading apparatus at UWA drum centrifuge
[Fri 20 May]
UWA Ludger Rausch University of Applied Sciences, Darmstadt, Germany
Numerical study of the combined load capacity of a hybrid foundation

Amin Rismanchian PhD Candidate, UWA
The resistance of soil berms during lateral buckling of pipelines on soft clay: an interpretation of centrifuge modelling data
UWA Lucile Queau PhD Candidate, UWA
[Fri 27 May]
Fatigue analysis of steel catenary risers using nonlinear riser-soil interaction model
[Wed 15 June]
Wollongong Dr Nam Huynh Dr Long Nghiem CME, UoW
The learning curve of early career researchers: from the Shine Dome of the Australian Academy of Science to practice
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH SEMINARS
49
[Fri 17 June]
Newcastle Alexandre Depouhon University of Minnesota, USA & Universit de Lige, Belgium
Mean-field homogenization for multi-scale modeling of materials and structures
[Tue 13 July]
Newcastle Dr Lanru Jing Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden
DECOVALEX: An international collaborative research project on radioactive waste disposal
[Fri 16 July]
Newcastle Prof Gernot Beer Graz University of Technology, Austria
Technology innovation in underground construction
[Fri 5 August]
UWA Dr Marco Uzielli Georisk Engineering, Italy
Serviceability limit state CPT-based design of shallow foundations on sand
[Tue 9 August]
Newcastle Nathan Podlich PhD Candidate, UoN
The formulation of parallel algorithms for large-scale limit analysis

Mason Crumpton PhD Candidate, UoN
Methods in computational limit analysis
[Fri 19 August]
Newcastle Hassan Sabetamal PhD Candidate, UoN
Finite element algorithms for dynamic analysis of geotechnical problems
[Thu 25 August]
Newcastle Xue Zhang PhD Candidate, UoN
Particle finite element method and its application to large deformation problems in geomechanics
[Fri 2 September]
Newcastle Dr James Hambleton UoN
Modelling the evolutionary problem of a rigid object interacting with a plastically deforming surface
[Fri 9 September]
UWA Chengcai Luo PhD Candidate, UWA
Submarine pipeline stability on mobile seabed-Large O-Tube
[Thu 15 September] Wollongong

Udeshini Pathirage PhD Candidate, UoW
Modelling of clogging in the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) in acid sulphate soil terrain
[Fri 16 September] Newcastle

Dr Jinsong Huang UoN
Reliability analysis of slopes

50 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering - 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH SEMINARS
[Fri 23 September] UWA

Zack Westgate PhD Candidate, UWA
Field observations of as-laid pipeline embedment in carbonate soils
[Fri 30 September] Newcastle

Dr Chao Yang UoN
Mechanical response of structured soils subjected to cyclic loading
[Fri 21 October]
UWA Dr Yinghui Tian UWA
On-bottom stability analysis for shallowly embedded long offshore pipelines
[Fri 4 November]
Newcastle Dr Klaus Thoeni UoN
Non-linear problems using BEM with applications in tunnelling
[Wed 9 November] Wollongong

Ana Heitor PhD Candidate, UoW
Characterization of compacted soil using non-destructive methods
[Fri 18 November] Newcastle

Dr Shanyong Wang UoN
3D experimental and numerical study of the fracture initiation, propagation and coalescence behaviour of heterogeneous rocks with single or multiple fissures
[Tue 22 November] Wollongong

Dr Olivier Buzzi UoN
Influence of calcium leaching on the behaviour of rock concrete interfaces
[Fri 25 November] Newcastle

Omid Kardani PhD Candidate, UoN
Iterative methods for solving large sparse linear systems arising from computational plasticity problems
[Fri 30 November] UWA

Christina Rudolph Hamburg University of Technology, Germany
Investigations on the behaviour of piles under cyclic lateral loading
[Thu 1 December] Newcastle

Dr David Masin Charles University in Prague
Fundamentals of hypoplasticity
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report RESEARCH SEMINARS
51
SELECTED ACHIEVEMENTS
Britta Bienen was promoted to the rank of Associate Professor. Olivier Buzzi was awarded the Pro-Vice Chancellors Award for Research Excellence. Olivier Buzzi was awarded an Outstanding Young Investigator Award at the 13th IACMAG Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Olivier Buzzi was selected as the Australasia representative on the ISSMGE Technical Committee of the International Group of Rock Mechanics. Antonio Carraro was recruited as a Research Academic in the CGSE and will commence early in 2012 at UWA. John Carter, in collaboration with Jinchun Chai (Saga, Japan), published the book Deformation Analysis in Soft Ground Improvement. John Carter was appointed as a Member of Sectional Committee 5, Applied Physical and Engineering Sciences, Australian Academy of Science, for the period 2011-2013. Mark Cassidy was appointed to the ARC College of Experts. Mark Cassidy was appointed as The Lloyds Register Educational Trust Chair of Offshore Foundation Systems. Anna Giacomini was appointed as a Research Academic in the Priority Research Centre for Geotechnical and Materials Modelling. James Hambleton was appointed as a Research Academic in the CGSE at the Newcastle node. Shazzad Hossain was elected as a Core Member of ISO TC67/ SC7/WG7 (International Organization for Standardization: sitespecific assessment of mobile offshore units Jack-ups). Shazzad Hossain and Mark Randolph were awarded the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) Offshore Award for their paper Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: numerical analysis. Gotechnique, 60(3), 171-184, 2010. This award is given to the paper that has been decided by the ICE award panel as the best paper published in Gotechnique in 2010 in the offshore category.
52
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED ACHIEVEMENTS
Shazzad Hossain and Mark Randolph were awarded the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) David Hislop Award for 2010. This award is for the best paper published in the Proceedings, or in an Institution conference volume, on heavy marine design and construction with particular reference to offshore engineering. Shazzad Hossain was awarded the D.H. Trollope Medal for 2010 by the Australian Geomechanics Society for his papers: Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: centrifuge tests. Gotechnique, 60(3), 157-170, 2010 and Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: numerical analysis. Gotechnique, 60(3), 171-184, 2010. The Medal is awarded to a member of the Society who is the author of an outstanding paper on either theoretical or applied Geomechanics, on a biannual basis, based on recent or current doctoral research. Jinsong Huang was appointed as a Research Academic in the CGSE at the Newcastle node. Mina Kardani completed a PhD and was appointed as a Research Associate in the CGSE to work in the area of dynamic soil-structure interaction. George Kouretzis was recruited as a Research Academic in the CGSE and will commence early in 2012 at Newcastle. Kristian Krabbenhoft was elected as the Australian representative on the ISSMGE Technical Committee on Safety and Serviceability. Xu Li was appointed as a Research Associate in the CGSE at UWA. Andrei Lyamin received an Excellent Contributions Award from the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG). The award was for his pioneering work on finite element limit analysis analysis. Richard Merifield received an Excellent Contributions Award from the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG). The award was for developing design methods to predict the stability analysis of slopes, foundations and anchors in both soil and rock. Richard Merifield was promoted to the rank of Associate Professor. Richard Merifield was appointed to the Editorial Boards of the Canadian Geotechnical Journal and Computers and Geotechnics. Conleth OLoughlin was recruited as an Associate Professor in the CGSE and will commence early in 2012 at UWA.
53
Mark Randolph was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society. Mark Randolph and Susan Gourvenec published the book Offshore Geotechnical Engineering. Scott Sloan was invited to give the 51st Rankine Lecture in March 2011 by the Institution of Civil Engineers London. This is the highest accolade that can be bestowed on a geotechnical engineer. Scott Sloan was appointed Chair of Sectional Committee 5, Applied Physical and Engineering Sciences, Australian Academy of Science. Sam Stanier was appointed as a Research Associate in the CGSE at UWA. Chet Vignes was recruited as a Research Academic in the CGSE and will commence early in 2012 at Newcastle. Cristina Vulpe was recruited as a Research Associate in the CGSE and will commence early in 2012 at UWA. David White received the Western Australian Early Career Scientist of the Year Award at the 2011 WA Science Awards. The award was to honour outstanding achievements in WA science. David White was winner of the 2011 Western Australian Tall Poppy Science Award. The award was to recognise Australian scientific excellence. David White (with colleagues Liang Cheng and Hongwei An from the School of Civil & Resource Engineering at UWA) was a winner of the Woodside Encouragement Prize at the WA Innovations 2011 Awards, for their O-tube research project. David White was appointed to the Gotechnique editorial subpanel for the 2012 Special Issue on offshore geotechnics. Chao Yang was appointed as a Research Academic in the CGSE at the Newcastle node. Bassem Youssef completed a PhD and was appointed as a Research Associate in the CGSE at UWA.
54
EXTERNAL FUNDING AWARDED
The Chief Investigators and Associates affiliated with the CGSE were successful in winning the following grants (only those relevant to the Centre are shown)
The CGSE led a successful bid for a Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities grant to develop a National Geotechnical Centrifuge Facility. This project is a national collaboration between The University of Western Australia (lead node), The University of Newcastle, The University of Wollongong, Monash University, The University of Adelaide and The University of Queensland. The grant of $700,000, together with additional funding provided by the project partners, will enable a new 10 metre diameter geotechnical centrifuge to be installed at UWA. This will form an integral part of the CGSE research on the modelling of complex offshore and onshore structures.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report EXTERNAL FUNDING AWARDED
55
Lachlan Bates attracted $208,512 in external funding from various industry sources (including Ausgrid Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd, Coffey Geotechnics Pty Ltd, Douglas Partners, Golder Associates Pty Ltd, Parsons Brinkerhoff Australia Pty Ltd, GHD, Menard Bachey Pty Ltd, Keller Ground Engineering Pty Ltd, Frankipile Australia Pty Ltd, Transpacific Industrial Solution, John Holland Group Pty. Ltd) for advanced in situ soil testing using the NEWSYD mobile facility. Britta Bienen received $93,690 from TU Hamburg-Harburg to investigate the tendency for pile plugging during installation, depending on the installation method and relative sand density. Britta Bienen received $40,000 from TU Hamburg-Harburg to investigate the tendency for pile displacement accumulation, when subjected to varying cyclic loading. Britta Bienen and Mark Cassidy were awarded $330,000 for a 4 year ARC Discovery Grant entitled Predicting the foundation performance of offshore jack-up drilling rigs in intermediate soils. A Postdoctoral Fellowship was funded for Dr Bienen. Christophe Gaudin and David White received $182,180 from Inpex for centrifuge modelling of gas export pipelinesoil interaction. Christophe Gaudin and Mark Cassidy received $31,750 from the University of Maine to research the design of mooring systems for floating offshore wind turbines. Susan Gourvenec and Mark Randolph received $114,400 from Subsea 7 (formerly Acergy) for mudmat design under general multi-dimensional loading.
56
Buddhima Indraratna and Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn were awarded $455,000 for a 3-year ARC Linkage project on Cyclic behaviour of unstable soils stabilised by lignosulfonate with special reference to rapid transport infrastructure. Kristian Krabbenhoft was awarded $813,192 for a 5-year ARC Future Fellowship to tackle Complex granular flows. Mark Randolph and Dong Wang were awarded $640,000 for an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant entitled Dynamic evolution of submarine slides and consequences for offshore developments. A Discovery Outstanding Research Award was funded for Professor Randolph and an International Collaboration Award was funded for Professor Alexander Puzrin from ETH Zurich. Shazzad Hossain, Mark Randolph and Mark Cassidy were awarded $409,904 for a 3 year Australian Research Council Linkage Grant entitled Estimation of spudcan penetration resistance in stratified soils directly from field penetrometer data and quantification of punch-through risk. A Postdoctoral Fellowship was funded for Dr Hossain. Shanyong Wang and Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn were each awarded a 3-year ARC Centre of Excellence ECR Researcher Support Award. The total value of these awards was $1,242,444 and they will be used to investigate Ground improvement methods for soft and problematic soils, which is a key focus of the CGSE. David White and Christophe Gaudin were awarded $331,325 from BP for centrifuge modelling of pipe-soil interaction. David White and Christophe Gaudin were awarded $331,250 from Woodside for centrifuge modelling of lateral pipe-soil interaction. David White was awarded $105,000 from Atkins Boreas for axial and lateral pipe-soil interaction within the SAFEBUCK GEO JIP.
57
SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS
58
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS
GRANULAR CONTACT DYNAMICS

Key Researchers: Kristian Krabbenhoft, Andrei Lyamin, Jinsong Huang, Mario Vicente da Silva, Scott Sloan Perhaps the most reliable and direct way of modelling the behaviour of granular materials is to account for the motion and interaction the individual particles that make up the material. This is the basic idea behind the discrete element method (DEM) which has been applied extensively in geotechnical engineering and related fields as an alternative to continuum models. Besides the limitation that the particle geometries are idealized as spheres or other simple geometric shapes, the main drawback of the DEM is the computational time required which easily exceeds days or weeks for typical problems of practical interest. Considering a collection of particles, the DEM works by first advancing the particle positions in an explicit manner according to Newtons second law of motion. Next, the overlap that may occur as a result of this is countered by applying repulsive forces according to an elastic law relating force and particle overlap. This approach requires very small time steps to maintain stability. Alternatively, it is possible to cast the governing equations in a time-implicit manner where both the particle displacements and the contact forces appear as the unknowns. The task is then to solve for the displacements while ensuring that the contact forces are of a magnitude that exactly prevents inter-particle penetration. This is the basic idea behind the new granular contact dynamics (GCD) scheme developed by CIs Kristian Krabbenhoft and Andrei Lyamin in collaboration Associates Jinsong
Huang and Mario Vicente da Silva (who is from the New University of Lisbon, Portugal and is spending his sabbatical year at the Centre). In contrast the conventional DEM, the GCD scheme allows for much larger time steps. It further comes in a static version that efficiently addresses problems where the time scales are such that dynamic effects are negligible. Examples include common soil mechanics laboratory tests such as triaxial tests, quasi-static cone penetration, and various applications in the earth sciences where the time scales are such that the deformations are of a quasi-static nature. The most basic GCD scheme operates with rigid spherical particles that interact via frictional contact (see Figure 1). Although this model has its natural limitations, it is attractive due to its simplicity, requiring only a single material parameter as input, namely the inter-particle friction coefficient. Starting from the basic rigid-frictional model, a number of more advanced models have been developed. These models include features such as nonlinear particle elasticity, viscous drag (for particles immersed in a fluid with a significant viscosity), and a novel three-dimensional model for rolling resistance which takes the effects of nonspherical particle geometries into account and allows for accurate simulation of natural granular materials such as sands without modelling the particle geometries in detail. So far, the scheme has been validated, qualitatively and quantitatively, for a large number of benchmark problems. An example is shown in Figure 2 where the static version of the scheme has been used to simulate a true triaxial test. As seen, the peak shear strength is highly dependent on the initial packing while, at sufficiently large strains, a unique critical state strength is obtained.
FIGURE 1: Frictional contact between two spherical particles.
FIGURE 2: Results of true triaxial tests on granular assemblies.

ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS GRANULAR CONTACT DYNAMICS 59
Another problem that has been dealt with quite extensively and used for validation of the new scheme is that of the collapse of granular columns, an example of which is shown in Figure 3. This problem has also been used to validate a continuum model for granular flows. Finally, in order to accommodate large-scale simulations a number of parallelization strategies have been developed. One such strategy uses ideas previously adopted in computational limit analysis applications. Considering a collection of particles, a domain decomposition is performed (see Figure 4) such that the task of solving the governing equations for each domain is assigned to an independent processor. This strategy has proved quite efficient and typically handles problems with around 1 million particles in about a week using a 100 core cluster. Further developments, particularly using General Purpose Graphic Processing Units (GPGPU) is expected to dramatically reduce this time so that problems with a few million particles can be solved in a matter of hours.
FIGURE 3: Granular column collapse and comparison with continuum model (red line).
FIGURE 4: Partitioning of granular assembly for parallel processing.

60 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS GRANULAR CONTACT DYNAMICS
DYNAMIC COMPACTION GROUTING

Key Researchers: Shanyong Wang, Scott Sloan, Buddhima Indraratna, John Carter, Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn The main objective of this research is to develop an efficient, environmentally friendly, and highly flexible method for improving the density and strength of soils, which is known as Dynamic Compaction Grouting (DCG). The basic concept for DCG is shown in Figure 1. This new technique introduces vibrations to the membrane of the grouting bag during the expansion/compaction process (Figure 1(b)). Unlike static compaction grouting (Figure 1(a)), the surrounding soil is not only compacted by the expanding membrane, but also by the membrane waves generated in the soil. The expansion of the membrane fills the voids that are created by the decrease in volume of the soil as a result of the densification process. This prevents loss of ground during the densification process, and minimises disturbance to surrounding structures. In the project, laboratory scale grouting tests will be performed to identify the critical controllable factors of DCG so that compaction effectiveness can be optimised. In addition, a Modified Cam Clay model for cyclic loading will be implemented in ABAQUS to simulate the soil behaviour under dynamic compaction grouting. Finally the data from an extensive suite of experimental tests will be compared with the finite element predictions to validate the theory.
FIGURE 2: Schematic of dynamic compaction grouting apparatus.
Laboratory Tests
The objective of the laboratory tests will be to study the fundamental mechanism of dynamic compaction grouting and the associated soil densification effect. The proposed laboratory grouting testing setup is shown in Figure 2. An important characteristic of the setup is that it can simulate dynamic compaction grouting in soils under triaxial conditions. In these tests, the effective confining pressure, lateral earth pressure coefficient (K0), excess pore water pressure, back pressure, void ratio change, as well as the vertical and lateral deformation of the specimen will be measured. In addition, the dynamic compaction grouting pressure, the dynamic compaction frequency, the dynamic compact grouting amplitude, and the dynamic compaction grouting period will be controlled.
FIGURE 1: Schematic static and dynamic compaction grouting.
FIGURE 3: Pressure pulse schematic.

ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS DYNAMIC COMPACTION GROUTING 61
The pressure pulsing device is a critical piece of equipment. The mechanics of pressure pulsing is the reverse of a combustion engine where rotary motion is converted to a vertical movement of a piston (Figure 3). A motor speed controller is used to control the speed of the pistons movement, which then controls the frequency of the vibrations. The movement of the piston forces fluid to move in and out of the cylinder, which in turn causes the membrane inside the soil to vibrate. As a result, energy is transferred to the surrounding soil and densifies it.
Numerical Analyses
The finite-element code ABAQUS will be used to perform the numerical simulations of static and dynamic compaction grouting. The soil is modelled as a multiphase material and effective stresses are adopted to describe its behaviour. Figure 4 shows the numerical model setup, which assumes axisymmetry. An anisotropic modified Cam Clay model for cyclic loading will be incorporated into ABAQUS to investigate the behaviour of loose soil under dynamic compact grouting. Figure 5 shows the behaviour of this model under
FIGURE 5: An anisotropic modified Cam Clay model for cyclic loading.
repeated consolidation and swelling. The model will be implemented in ABAQUS through its user subroutine UMAT. A parametric study will then be performed to investigate the influence of dynamic frequency, dynamic amplitude, and dynamic period on both the efficiency of the soil mass. The numerical results of the parametric study will be validated by experimental results, thus allowing the degree of soil improvement by the DCG method to be identified. Finally, numerical simulations for practical problems using DCG will be conducted. The results of this integrated study will provide a valuable method to engineers for ground improvement. A series of charts and design recommendations will be developed.
FIGURE 4: Finite element axial-symmetric mesh and boundary conditions for static/dynamic compaction grouting tests.
62 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS DYNAMIC COMPACTION GROUTING
SCREW ANCHOR FOUNDATIONS

Key Researchers: Richard Merifield, Andrew Abbo, Dong Wang, Christophe Gaudin, Yuxia Hu Screw piles, also known as helical piles or screw anchors, are used as a foundation system to sustain tensile, compressive, and/or lateral loads. They are composed of a number of helical plates welded along a central shaft, as illustrated in Figure 1. The usage of screw anchors in Australia is gaining popularity and, although they have been successfully used in domestic applications for years, their behaviour is not well understood. Moreover, the methods used by manufacturers and engineers for estimating screw pile capacity lack engineering acceptance and geotechnical rigor. The primary aim of this research project is to use a combination of numerical modelling, physical modelling, and field testing techniques to better understand multi-helix screw pile foundation behaviour in a range of applications and soil types. A practical design framework for helical pile foundations will be established to replace existing semiempirical design methods that are inadequate and have been found to be excessively under or over conservative. This framework can
FIGURE 2: Applications for screw anchors.
then be used by design engineers to confidently estimate the capacity of multihelix screw piles for engineering projects.
Significance
In recent years, the use of helical anchors has expanded beyond their traditional use in the electrical power industry. The advantages of rapid installation and immediate loading capability have resulted in their being used in more traditional civil engineering applications. They are now used as foundation systems for new construction, tie downs for structures subject to uplift, and tiebacks for the retention of slopes and walls. Some example applications of helical anchors are shown in Figure 2. Unfortunately, our current understanding of these
FIGURE 1: Typical Screw Anchor.
FIGURE 3: Model Screw Anchor.

ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS SCREW ANCHOR FOUNDATIONS 63
anchors is unsatisfactory and the underlying theoretical framework adopted by engineers has proven to be largely inappropriate and inadequate. A better understanding of the behaviour of helical anchors will lead to increased confidence in design, their wider acceptance as a foundation alternative, and more economic and safer designs.
Testing Methodology
This project will exploit the strengths of the Newcastle and UWA nodes of the CoE, and enable a fully integrated approach to be adopted that will include: 1. Advanced numerical analysis 2. Full scale field testing 3. Centrifuge testing 4. In-situ soil characterisation
For a helical anchor with specified geometry, the undrained uplift capacity depends on not only the soil strength profile but also the overburden pressure imposed on the anchor. For this reason, the observed collapse mechanism is often different in small-scale 1g model tests in clay, where the over-burden pressure is negligible relative to the ultimate uplift capacity. The purpose of our centrifuge tests is to observe the entire pullout process of helical anchors and to study the capacities against non-uniform strength profiles. Preliminary work has already been undertaken for anchors in clay using large displacement finite element analyses and the geotechnical centrifuge at 100g. A sample model anchor is shown in Figure 3. A typical measured load-displacement curve for twin-helix anchors is shown in Figure 4.
FIGURE 5: Predicted displacements at failure for various screw anchors.
Preliminary numerical analyses confirm that the failure mechanisms for these types of foundations is complex, as indicated by the contours of displacement for a range of twin-helix anchors with different embedment depths and anchor spacings in Figure 5.
FIGURE 4: Responses of anchors in centrifuge.

64 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS SCREW ANCHOR FOUNDATIONS
OFFSHORE FOUNDATIONS AND ANCHORS

Key Researchers: Majid Nazem, Kristian Krabbenhoft, Britta Bienen, Mark Cassidy, Mark Randolph, Richard Merifield, Wojtek Solowski, Christophe Gaudin, Dong Wang In many offshore engineering problems, soil undergoes large deformations while interacting with a structure under static, geostatic, or dynamic loads. Examples include the installation of a spudcan foundation, the penetration of a torpedo anchor into the seabed, the investigation of the pullout capacity of anchors embedded in soil, and the estimation of soil properties using devices such as a cone penetrometer, a T-bar, or a ball penetrometer. Due to their extremely complex and nonlinear nature, purely analytical solutions for such problems do not exist in the literature. Numerical methods, on the other hand, can take advantage of superfast computers and are very suitable for the analysis of offshore foundation problems. Owing to extremely large deformations, the highly nonlinear behaviour of soil, the presence of pore water pressures, the changing boundary conditions, and, in some cases, dynamic forces, many current numerical methods fail to tackle such problems accurately and efficiently. Advanced new algorithms, tailored to the problems at hand, need to be developed. Over the past two decades, the geotechnical research group at The University of Newcastle has developed a finite element code, SNAC, for analysing complex geotechnical problems. SNAC takes advantage of the Arbitrary LagrangianEulerian (ALE) strategy as well as the h-adaptive finite element method. Both these methods have proven to be robust and efficient for solving large deformation problems in geomechanics. SNAC has been successfully used to solve a wide range of complex geotechnical problems including footings undergoing large deformations (Figure 1), the static and dynamic penetration of objects into
FIGURE 2: Simulation of static cone penetration test (h-adaptive FE).
soil layers (Figures 2 and 3), and finite deformation analysis of consolidating soil under loaded footings. Nonetheless, analysing the interaction between the soil and a structure, in the presence of pore water pressures and static or dynamic loads, still remains a challenge in computational geomechanics. To numerically simulate such problems an advanced time-integration scheme is needed to solve the highly nonlinear global equations which follow from the principle of virtual work, the continuity equation, the principle of effective stress and Darcys law. In addition, a constitutive soil model which can consider the effects of large deformations, strain-rate, strain-softening, pore pressure accumulation under cyclic loading, inhomogeneity, and the possibility of liquefaction must be formulated. After developing and implementing the new algorithms, the computational tool will be validated by comparing the numerical results with available experimental test data and field observations. Experimental and field data will flow from the extensive suite of centrifuge and field tests (at the Ballina test site) that will be conducted as part of the CGSE. Once the numerical tool has been validated, it will be employed to study offshore geotechnical problems in more detail. Among other potential applications, the project will focus on the numerical simulation of spudcans, torpedo anchors, and the penetrometers used for site-investigation purposes. Each of these cases is briefly explained in the following.
FIGURE 1: Large deformation analysis of an undrained soil under a footing (ALE).

ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS OFFSHORE FOUNDATIONS AND ANCHORS 65
Spudcans: Spudcans form the foundation of mobile
jack-up rigs which are widely used in offshore drilling, exploration and site investigation. The main goal here is to conduct a parametric study to find out the effect of key parameters on the capacity of the soil surrounding the spudcans. These parameters include the installation rate, the mechanical and hydraulic properties of the soil, the consolidation time, and the geometry of the spudcan. In addition, it is also important to study the failure mechanisms due to spudcan penetration into a strong soil layer overlying a weak layer.
Torpedo anchors: Torpedos are a new anchoring
system developed for tethering buoyant facilities in deep water. Torpedo anchors, usually 12-15 m long, are deployed from a ship and penetrate to a depth of 20 to 35 m below the mudline under the action of their own kinetic energy. The soil fills the gap created above the anchor, and then starts to consolidate. This project will investigate the behaviour of torpedo anchors including the penetration phase and the following consolidation phase, as well as the resultant pullout capacity. Among other factors, the important parameters included will be the geometry of the anchor, its weight and impact velocity, the mechanical properties of the soil and its permeability, and the consolidation time allowed.
and offshore engineering, but are challenging to analyse. In offshore engineering, the piezoball penetrometer is able to determine the soil type and provide data on consolidation characteristics of the soil. Such information may be used to estimate the hydraulic and mechanical properties, which are crucial for geotechnical design. To achieve this goal, however, validated relations between the penetration measurements and soil properties are required. The advanced finite element formulations developed as a part of this project will be used to conduct a parametric study to correlate the penetrometer properties, such its geometry and the penetration rate, to the soil properties including the stiffness, the shear strength, and the permeability. In summary, this project involves extensive collaboration between two nodes of the Centre, The University of Newcastle and The University of the Western Australia. The complimentary skills of the two nodes will permit a wide range of offshore engineering problems to be studied in detail, both numerically and experimentally.
Penetrometers: Penetrometers are widely used for site-investigation purposes in both on shore
FIGURE 3: Dynamic penetration of an object into a soil layer (ALE).

66 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS OFFSHORE FOUNDATIONS AND ANCHORS
USE OF SEPLAS AS A PERMANENT MOORING SOLUTION

Key Researchers: Christophe Gaudin, Mark Randolph, Mark Cassidy, Yinghui Tian, Dong Wang, Richard Merifield As oil and gas developments move off the continental slopes into water depths exceeding 1000m, novel anchor systems are required for permanent mooring of floating processing facilities. The CGSE has been investigating a number of deep water options, including Suction Embedded PLate Anchors (SEPLA). SEPLAs have been developed to answer the growing need for anchors to withstand significant vertical loading. The concept combines the advantage of suction caissons (known penetration depth and location) and drag-embedded plate anchors (efficiency and low cost). The plate anchor is housed initially within a slot at the tip of a suction caisson (also called a follower). The anchor is embedded by pumping out the water inside the suction caisson. When the targeted depth is reached, the pump flow is reversed, and the caisson retrieved, leaving the SEPLA in place in a vertical inclination. The slack mooring chain attached to the anchor padeye is then tensioned, causing the SEPLA to rotate, in a process known as keying, to an inclination that is, for a symmetric anchor, approximately normal to the local chain orientation. A photo of an offshore SEPLA is provided (Figure 1). Before SEPLAs can be used regularly for permanent installations, a number of research issues need to addressed. These include, (i) during the keying process, as the anchor is first loaded, what is the loss of embedment and reduction in capacity?, (ii) what is the long-termed sustained loading capacity?, and (iii) what is the operational cyclic loading capacity? In an integrated project, initially funded by ExxonMobil in Houston, these questions were addressed through centrifuge testing, large deformation finite element analysis and analytical developments. The centrifuge testing process mimicked both the installation and operation of the anchor and provided insights into (i) the keying of the anchor and the associated loss of embedment, (ii) the combined effect of consolidation and strain softening during sustained loading and the
FIGURE 1: Offshore SEPLA.
associated loss or gain in capacity and (iii) the cyclic degradation under various levels of cyclic loading. A model anchor was manufactured from stainless steel, replicating at a scale of 1/150th all the features of a typical SEPLA, including the shank and the keying flap (Figure 2). Although the dimensions became small, particular attention was paid to modelling the position of the padeye and the eccentricity of the hinge of the keying flap correctly. PIV tests were also conducted to trace the displacement trajectory during keying. Using these results, an analytical plasticity model, named Chain And Selpa Plasticity Analysis (CASPA), has been developed to allow a quick prediction of the trajectory and load development during anchor keying and up to peak load. Perfect plasticity is assumed, allowing the kinematics of the anchor to
FIGURE 2: Model SEPLA.

ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS USE OF SEPLAS AS A PERMANENT MOORING SOLUTION 67
The team of Christophe Gaudin, Mark Randolph, Mark Cassidy, Yinghui Tian and Dong Wang is continuing this research, with current investigations concentrating on defining the changing yield surface size and shape with protruding shank geometry, alignment of analytical and large deformation finite element results, developing an analytical method to predict sustained and cyclic capacity, and application of SEPLAs in Australian deep water calcareous muds.
FIGURE 3: Example centrifuge result.
be determined from a yield surface and associated plastic potential. In CASPA the trajectory and performance of a typical SEPLA can be predicted using the model and its application has been verified though comparison with results from the centrifuge tests (Figure 3). Further analytical results indicate that the loss of embedment can be reduced significantly by increasing the offset, but at the detriment of the ultimate anchor capacity. In the current industry design, a keying flap is widely employed with the aim of reducing embedment loss. In centrifuge tests and large deformation finite element analyses this flap has been shown to not work as expected (and have christened it the cane toad of the anchor world). Further numerical simulations have been conducted (Figure 4) to explore the flow mechanism of the keying flap and these have identified the problem with the current flap and a new design that opens during keying (limiting loss of embedment) but closes during sustained loading (maximising capacity) has been suggested.
FIGURE 4: SEPLA and keying flap.

68 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS USE OF SEPLAS AS A PERMANENT MOORING SOLUTION
SPUDCAN PUNCH-THROUGH
Key Researchers: Mark Cassidy, Sam Stanier, Dong Wang, David White, Mark Randolph, Majid Nazem, Yuxia Hu, Shazzad Hossain, Pan Yu, Xu Li, Stefanus Safinus, Jingbin Zheng In the shallow water offshore oil and gas industry, punch-through of spudcan foundations is still the most frequent cause of failure for jack-up platforms. This phenomenon arises during preloading of the jack-up on soil stratigraphies incorporating strong layers in generally soft material. The thin layers of strong material cause a transient increase in penetration resistance, which diminishes as the spudcan foundation penetrates past the stiff layer. This can cause uncontrolled penetration of the jack-up leg being preloaded, potentially causing damage to the jack-up leg or toppling of the jackup structure. These failures or periods of downtime are very costly and hazardous to operators. Therefore accurately predicting the risk and severity of punch-through is of great importance to the shallow water offshore oil and gas industry. This punch-through phenomenon is being studied at the CGSE using a combination of centrifuge and numerical modelling. Punch-through of spudcan foundations on sand overlying clay strata has been studied in the drum centrifuge by Mark Cassidy, Sam Stanier and Dong Wang and their PhD student Pan Hu. A comprehensive suite of tests has been performed on loose sand overlying clay strata of varying geometries to complement existing
tests data for dense sand overlying clay strata. This data set has then been used to recalibrate an existing failure stress dependent analytical model for predicting the peak penetration resistance that was previously developed at COFS. The recalibrated model has then been validated against other existing centrifuge tests data in the literature and compared with current best industry practice in the form of the ISO 2012 guidelines. As Figure 1 shows, the newly calibrated failure stress dependent method is far superior to current best industry practice, since all forms of the current recommendations in the ISO 2012 guidelines would significantly under predict the peak penetration resistance, thus leading to underestimation of the risk of a punch-through event occurring. One of the principal problems with predicting the potential for punch-through offshore is soil characterisation. For example when a stiff layer is observed during site investigation using a penetrometer it is difficult to know whether it is sand, clay or silt. Knowing this is important as different calculation methods are employed depending upon the type of material found. Shazzad Hossain, Mark Randolph, Mark Cassidy and Dong Wang have been working with PhD students Stefanus Safinus and Jingbin Zheng on the development of a universal design approach. This approach will be applicable to any soil profile, accounting for methodical consistency and robustness. For this purpose, a high quality field and experimental database of spudcan behaviour in layered soils is being consolidated. Centrifuge model tests and large deformation FE analyses on spudcans and cones penetrating multilayer sediments, mimicking these field data, have been undertaken and more are scheduled in 2012. Carbonate soils, prevalent in Australian waters, are of particular interest, as the behaviour of spudcan foundations in these soils is not well understood. Characterisation of these materials is of primary importance as it provides input to the centrifuge and numerical models. Preliminary laboratory tests, including Rowe cell, Triaxial, and Simple Shear tests to identify the soil strength behaviour, have been undertaken since August 2011. A program in VBExcel is being coded to assist the interpretation of soil layering from CPT data, extraction of relevant soil parameters, prediction of the spudcan penetration resistance profile and identification of potential punch-though. The goal is to develop an integrated jack-up installation system as shown in Figure 2, which will allow cone penetration tests (CPT) to be performed and (based on the real time data) prediction of the spudcan penetration resistance profile to be
FIGURE 1: Performance of recalibrated failure stress dependent model versus current best industry practice from the ISO 2012 guidelines.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS SPUDCAN PUNCH-THROUGH
69
made prior to preloading. This will assist jack-up operators in making decisions regarding what if any mitigation measures need to undertaken before preloading to prevent a potential punchthrough hazard. Shazzad Hossain, Yuxia Hu and Long Yu are investigating the potential to replace spudcan foundations with a skirted foundation in an attempt to mitigate the punch-through risk in sand-overlying clay deposits using both centrifuge tests and Large Deformation Finite Element (LDFE) approaches. The results of the LDFE analyses were validated against the centrifuge test data prior to undertaking a parametric study. This study covered a range within the bounds of practical interest of foundation diameters, aspect ratios of skirt depth to foundation diameter, relative thickness and density (or friction and dilation angles) of the upper sand layer and normalised strength and strength non-homogeneity of the lower clay layer. The results show that the use of alternative skirted foundations eliminated severe punch-through on the loose to medium dense sand overlying clay deposits. A skirt length to foundation diameter ratio of 0.25 was sufficient to mitigate punchthrough failure as is shown in Figure 3.
FIGURE 3: Mitigation of spudcan punch-through in sand overlying clay using skirted foundations.
To compliment this body of experimental work various numerical approaches to the problem are also being developed. Dong Wang has been developing the Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) method in collaboration with Sam Stanier, Mark Cassidy and their PhD student Pan Hu. This method allows for large deformation in the soil, without mesh distortion induced errors, by coupling an Eulerian solution domain for the soil with a Lagrangian domain for the spudcan foundation. So far this method has been used with simple elasto-plastic MohrCoulomb constitutive models representing the sand clay layers. These techniques will eventually be coupled with a constitutive model for the sand that captures the dilatancy and transient peak strength of the sand layer with respect to initial relative density, such as the hypoplastic model. David White, Yuxia Hu and Xu Li are extending the Mohr-Coulomb model using Boltons (1986) relationships to capture dilatancy and peak strength. This model has been incorporated into AFENA using the RITSS Large Deformation Finite Element (LDFE) Method developed at COFS. It is now being used to analyse punch-through tests on sand overlying clay strata performed in the centrifuge. Figure 4 shows the simulation of sand overlying clay spudcan punch-through tests performed in a centrifuge published in the literature versus the LDFE simulation using the Modified Mohr-Coulomb model. As the spudcan penetrates through the sand layer the dilatancy of the sand diminishes, yielding a peak penetration resistance and potential for punch-through. Further validation of the model is ongoing and it is hoped that it may be used in the future, in combination with centrifuge testing, to develop simple analytical models for practicing engineers
FIGURE 2: CPT integrated in a spudcan foundation.

70 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS SPUDCAN PUNCH-THROUGH
FIGURE 4: LDFE simulation of sand overlying clay spudcan punch-through compared to centrifuge data from the literature.
to assess punch-through risk in stratified samples using site investigation data. This combination of experimental and numerical work being conducted at the CGSE is ongoing. 2012 will see a large variety of spudcan punchthrough tests being performed in both the beam and drum centrifuges at UWA. These tests will look at a range of variables including but not limited to: the impact of geometry and density of sand layers inter-bedded into soft clay; the potential impact of inter-bedded calcareous layers; spudcan foundation geometry; potential of preloading holding periods causing punch-through due to consolidation; and the use of novel foundations shapes to mitigate the severity of punch-through. Data yielded from these tests will be used to continue validation and calibration of the numerical techniques being coupled in parallel. The ultimate goal is to better equip offshore geotechnical engineers with simple analytical design tools that they can use to accurately predict punch-through events, as well as to provide tested and validated mitigation solutions when such a risk has been identified.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS SPUDCAN PUNCH-THROUGH
71
LIMIT ANALYSIS OF RANDOM MATERIALS

Key Researchers: Andrei Lyamin, Vaughan Griffiths, Jinsong Huang, Scott Sloan, Mark Cassidy By the very nature of its origins and deposition, soil is one of the most variable of all engineering materials. This variability is rarely taken into account directly in traditional geotechnical engineering design, rather some cautiously selected characteristic value is assumed to act across the region of interest. All potential uncertainties are then dealt with by the use of factors of safety when designing against ultimate or serviceability limit states. Most geotechnical designs continue to be based on the traditional working stress design (WSD) approach, however in recent years there has been a significant growth in Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) approaches involving partial factors on different components of the design. In the LRFD approach, dead and live loads may be factored up, and resistances may be factored down. In the partial factor approach, different factors may apply to different components, i.e. a different factor may be applied to tan(f) than c reflecting different degrees of reliability about the estimation of those parameters. The introduction of the term reliability suggests that a statistical approach may be valuable in choosing the resistance factors needed to achieve a minimum degree of reliability in a design. In spite of some reluctance on the part of civil engineers to embrace probabilistic concepts, there is now a rapid growth in interest in these methods applied to geotechnical engineering.
FIGURE 2: Probabilistic approach.
Indeed, eminent academics and practitioners have raised the profile of probabilistic concepts, by explaining the methods in familiar terminology. Recent dedicated conferences have brought these concepts to a wider audience, including the insurance industry, and new textbooks, journals and conference sessions dedicated to risk and reliability have appeared. Traditional geotechnical analysis and design, for example of a bearing capacity problem, is displayed in Figure 1. Here we input our characteristic values of f and c into Terzaghis bearing capacity equation, compute an ultimate bearing capacity qult and then divide by a generous factor of safety FS to give the allowable value qall. In the probabilistic approach, still based on Terzaghis equation, the goal is to estimate the probability of failure as an alternative to the factor of safety. As shown in Figure 2, we input means and standard deviations of input parameters and emerge with a mean and standard deviation of the bearing capacity, from which probabilities can be estimated. Of interest to engineers, for example, would be an estimate of the probability of the ultimate bearing capacity falling below the allowable value P[qult < qall]. As can be noted in Figure 2, some probabilistic methods may also account for cross-correlation between parameters and spatial correlation (or auto-correlation). The former recognises that random input parameters may not be independent (i.e. when tan(f) is above its mean the same may also be so for c or vice versa) and the latter recognises that random properties close together in the field are more likely to have similar values that those far apart.
FIGURE 1: Traditional approach.

72 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS LIMIT ANALYSIS OF RANDOM MATERIALS
FIGURE 3: Typical RFEM simulations.
An obvious question is how can we best perform the operation indicated in Figure 2, in which input variability is translated into output variability? In terms of sophistication and mathematical complexity, we might identify three levels of probabilistic analysis: 1. Event trees 2. First order methods 3. Monte-Carlo simulations
FIGURE 4: Typical upper bound limit analysis simulations.
Under level 3 above, we propose to build on a methodology called the Random Finite Element Method (RFEM), first developed by Griffiths and Fenton, in which random fields are used to model soil properties and combined with finite elements in a Monte-Carlo framework. The method has already been applied successfully to numerous collapse problems in geotechnical engineering using an elastic-plastic finite element algorithm. See Figure 3 for examples of RFEM bearing capacity and slope stability models. In this project we propose to combine the random field methodology with the Upper and Lower bound finite element limit analysis (LA) algorithms developed at Newcastle. These algorithms are computationally efficient at bracketing the true collapse load of geotechnical problems through exact adherence to the upper (UB) and lower bound (LB) theorems of LA. Examples of UB solutions to bearing capacity and slope stability for homogeneous soils are shown in Figures 4. The research will involve significant algorithm and code development in order to map random field properties onto the elements and nodes of existing
LA programs. The results of the Limit Analysis/ Random Field (LARF) analyses will be compared with existing results obtained by elastic-plastic RFEM. Of particular interest in this investigation will be (i) analysis of the difference between the upper and lower bounds in random soils, which will itself be a positive random variable, (ii) the dependence of LARF results on the mesh pattern, with particular interest on the possibility of using adapted meshes, and (iii) the potential for improved computational efficiency by LA compared with iteration-intensive elastic-plastic FE. Even modest improvements can be greatly magnified in a Monte-Carlo context. The goal of this project is to develop comprehensive and cost-effective methods to predict the probability density function of output quantities of interest (e.g., deformations, shakedown, capacity), which can in turn be used for a risk-based assessment of geo-structural performance.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS LIMIT ANALYSIS OF RANDOM MATERIALS
73
MODELLING EVOLUTIONARY CONTACT IN PLOUGHING AND CUTTING OF SOILS

Key Researchers: Jim Hambleton, Dave White, Sam Stanier, Richard Merifield, Kristian Krabbenhoft Numerous applications in civil engineering revolve around displacement or removal of soil by means of ploughing and cutting. The terms ploughing and cutting both refer to processes by which deformation is induced by sliding contact with a rigid or flexible object, an example of which is shown in Figure 1. Ploughing and cutting are differentiated, however, by whether or not separation of the material occurs, as shown schematically in Figure 2. Both processes play direct roles in earthmoving, mining, dredging, trenching, tunnelling and similar areas, and they are also relevant on the micro-structural level in soil-structure interaction, as sliding of asperities on interfacing materials (e.g. concrete and soil) can be a significant source of friction and wear. While ploughing and cutting in metals have been investigated extensively, studies dealing with soils are limited. For both metals and soils, there is a basic lack of understanding of the unsteady regime in which the object (plough or cutter) first makes contact with the soil and then begins to slide with prescribed force or penetration. In this transient regime, the shape and location of material boundaries, as well as the stress and strain fields, evolve in time. As a consequence, basic quantities of interest such as horizontal (drag) force and penetration also change in time. Furthermore, previous studies focus heavily on ploughing and
FIGURE 2: (a) Ploughing and (b) cutting as distinct modes of deformation as an object slides over a surface.
cutting under plane-strain conditions despite the fact that the deformation is typically threedimensional. As compared to metals, analysis of soils is also complicated by the presence of pore water, which plays an important role in offshore applications such as pipeline ploughing. Through the use of state-of-the-art experimental methods and computational techniques, this project aims to build an understanding of the
FIGURE 1: Ploughing of soft clay by a flat, inclined plate of narrow with.

74 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report
FIGURE 3: Results of two-dimensional (plane strain) finite element simulations of a smooth, rigid wedge sliding over cohesive material. In the first stage (top), a normal force is applied without translation (i.e. indentation), and the wedge then slides from left to right. Contours show equivalent plastic strain.
SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS MODELLING EVOLUTIONARY CONTACT IN PLOUGHING AND CUTTING OF SOILS
FIGURE 4: Pattern of deformation observed in a threedimensional finite element simulation of a smooth, rigid wedge of narrow width sliding over cohesive material.
evolutionary deformation occurring in ploughing and cutting of soils. In experiments, quantitative analysis of the evolving displacement field is performed using particle image velocimetry (PIV), and centrifuge testing is employed to reproduce full-scale behaviour, especially for investigation of applied problems relevant to industry. Observations from experiments are subsequently used as the basis for developing analytical models and validating results from comprehensive numerical simulations. In numerical simulations, attention is directed at implementing methods that effectively accommodate extreme deformations. These include adaptive finite element methods, meshless continuum-based approaches, and particle-based methods. Special emphasis in both analytical and numerical modelling is placed on accounting for three-dimensional deformation and the effects of pore pressure. Figures 3 and 4 show typical results from two- and three-dimensional finite element simulations of quasi-static ploughing in cohesive material by a rigid wedge. Figure 3 highlights the evolutionary nature of the ploughing process as the wedge initially indents the material and then slides from left to right under prescribed normal force. One can observe basic similarities and differences between plane strain (Figure 3) and the threedimensional configuration for a wedge of narrow width (Figure 4). A significant difference is that material flows to the sides of the wedge in three dimensions, and as a consequence, relatively large penetration is maintained as the configuration approaches steady state. In plain strain, penetration in steady state is practically zero.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS MODELLING EVOLUTIONARY CONTACT IN PLOUGHING AND CUTTING OF SOILS
75
APPLICATION OF PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAINS AND VACUUM PRELOADING

Key Researchers: Buddhima Indraratna, John Carter, Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn, Geng Xueyu, Sanjay Nimbalkar, Shanyong Wang, Daichao Sheng, Richard Kelly, Scott Sloan The booming population and associated development in coastal and metropolitan areas have necessitated the use of previously undeveloped low-lying areas for construction purposes. Most of the Australian coastal belt contains very soft clays up to significant depths, especially in Northern Queensland and New South Wales. The low bearing capacity and high compressibility of these deposits affects the long term stability of buildings, roads, rail tracks, and other forms of major infrastructure. Therefore, it is imperative to stabilise these soils before commencing construction to prevent unacceptable differential settlement. However, attempts to improve deep bearing strata may not be commensurate with the overall cost of the infrastructure. In the past, various types of vertical drains such as sand drains, sand compaction piles, prefabricated vertical drains (PVDs which are geosynthetic), stone columns, and gravel piles have commonly been used. Certain types of granular piles and deep stone columns may indeed enhance significantly the load capacity of the soil. However, flexible PVDs have gained in popularity in recent years as they pose a lower risk of damage to existing utilities from lateral ground movement and are significantly cheaper than other alternatives. Moreover, their installation can significantly reduce the preloading period by decreasing the length of the drainage path, sometimes by a factor of 10 or more. Just as importantly, PVDs can be installed very quickly with minimum environmental implications and quarrying requirements. Preloading is one of the most successful techniques for improving the shear strength of low-lying areas because it preloads the ground surface to induce a greater part of the final settlement that it is expected to occur a long time after construction has finished. In order to control the development of excess pore pressure, a surcharge embankment is usually raised in multiple stages, with rest or consolidation periods between the loading stages. Since many compressible lowlying soils have very low permeabilities and occur in thick beds, a lengthy time period is usually needed to achieve the desired primary degree of consolidation (>95%). In these instances, the
FIGURE 1: Spring analogy of vacuum consolidation process: (a) under fill surcharge; (b) under vacuum load.
height of the surcharge can be excessive from an economic perspective and also causes stability problems. One drawback of the surcharge technique is that the preload must be applied for a sufficiently long period, which may at times become impractical due to stringent construction schedules and deadlines. When PVDs are combined with surcharge preloading, a much shorter drainage path in the radial direction is provided, which reduces the required preload period significantly. PVDs are thus cost effective and can be readily installed in moderate to highly compressible soils (up to 40 m deep) that are normally consolidated or lightly over-consolidated. PVDs are less effective if installed in heavily over-consolidated clays. Vacuum pressure may also be used to enhance the efficiency of PVDs. Negative pore pressures (suctions) distributed along the drains and on the surface of the ground accelerate consolidation, reduce lateral displacement, and increase the effective stress. This allows the height of the
76
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS APPLICATION OF PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAINS AND VACUUM PRELOADING
FIGURE 2: Instrumentation layout for the test embankments at Ballina Bypass.
of soft estuarine clay. As the vertical load from 25 tonne axle trains is borne mainly by the shallow subgrade, relatively short PVDs were adequate to dissipate the cyclic excess pore water pressure. Moreover, the short PVDs also contributed to the control of the lateral displacements in the shallow soft estuarine clay, having effectively consolidated it within a period of a few months. In this case, no external surcharge fill was used as preloading and no vacuum application was required as only the shallow clay layer immediately beneath the ballast and sub-ballast warranted stabilisation. It is clear that PVDs, combined with vacuum and surcharge preloading, is a highly effective approach for ground improvement. However, analytical and numerical modelling of vacuum preloading is a difficult problem, and there is often a significant discrepancy between the predicted and observed performance of embankments stabilised with vertical drains and vacuum pressure. This discrepancy can be attributed to numerous factors such as the uncertainty of soil properties, the effect of smear, inaccurate assumptions about the soil behaviour and the vacuum pressure distribution, and the usual simplification of the 3D drainage pattern to a 2D plane strain one.
surcharge embankment to be reduced, thus reducing the likelihood of instability and lateral movement in the soil. This approach is designed to distribute the vacuum (suction) pressure to deep layers of the subsoil, and can be explained by a spring analogy (Figure 1). In the context of conventional surcharge preloading, the effective stress increases due to the suction (negative) pressure, while the total stress remains the same. Although PVDs combined with vacuum preloading are widely used in practical ground improvement projects, e.g. the Ballina Bypass (Figure 2) and the Port of Brisbane (Figure 3), the predicted behaviour is often at variance with the observed behaviour. In practice, railway tracks and airport runways are constantly subjected to relatively high cyclic loads that build up pore water pressures in the underlying subsoil unless sufficient drainage is provided. Laboratory experiments indicate that cyclic pore pressures build up rapidly under high frequency loading, and that these pressures can be dissipated effectively using PVDs. Monitoring of the Sandgate site (near Newcastle) has been performed where relatively short drains were installed to stabilise a rail track constructed on at least 30 m
FIGURE 3: Vacuum at Port of Brisbane.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS APPLICATION OF PREFABRICATED VERTICAL DRAINS AND VACUUM PRELOADING
77
CYCLIC LOADING OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

Key Researchers: Buddhima Indraratna, John Carter, Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn, Geng Xueyu, Sanjay Nimbalkar, Shanyong Wang, Daichao Sheng, Richard Kelly, Scott Sloan, Andrei Lyamin In Australia, railways form the largest worldwide network for public and freight transportation. Given the increased demand for freight transport from the mining and agriculture industries, and for greater public transport via trains due to increased fuel costs, heavier cyclic loading on existing tracks is now inevitable. This leads to progressive deterioration and densification of the ballast and, consequently, to a loss of track geometry and differential track settlement. This in turn affects the safety and efficiency of rail tracks, and often results in speed restrictions and more frequent maintenance. This problem is most severe under high impact loads with rail or wheel imperfections, as it accelerates the breakage of ballast. The current research program aims to provide a comprehensive insight into the geotechnical behaviour of ballast under cyclic and impact loading, and to assess the relative benefits of various types of synthetic grids and shock mats for enhanced track longevity.
FIGURE 2: Typical impact force responses.
Performance Improvement of Railway Ballast Using Shock Mats

The impact testing equipment consists of a freefall hammer of 5.81 kN weight that can be dropped from a maximum height of 6 m with an equivalent maximum drop velocity of 10 m/s (Figure 1). To eliminate any surrounding ground motion, the rig rests on a strong isolated concrete foundation (5.0 m x 3.0 m x 2.5 m) that is designed to have a significantly higher fundamental frequency. The transient impact forces are recorded by a dynamic load cell (capacity of 1200 kN) mounted on the drop-weight hammer. The load cell and accelerometers are connected to a computer controlled data acquisition system. The impact load-time history under a single impact load (1st drop of the free-fall hammer) is shown in Figure 2. Two distinct types of peak forces occur; an instantaneous sharp peak P1 with a high frequency and P2, a gradual peak of smaller magnitude with a lower frequency. These peak forces, P1 and P2, need to modelled in order to better understand the mechanics that govern track behaviour. This, in turn, will lead to improved track designs.
Field Tests on Instrumented Track at Bulli, NSW

In order to investigate vertical and lateral track deformations and the benefits of using geosynthetics, a field trial was carried out on a instrumented track. Fresh ballast (Cu = 1.5) and recycled ballast (Cu = 1.8) without geosynthetic reinforcement were used, while the two other sections were built by placing a geocomposite layer at the ballast-subballast interface (Figure 3). The geocomposite layers consisted of bi-axial geogrids placed over the non-woven polypropylene geotextile layers.
FIGURE 1: Drop weight impact testing equipment.
78 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS CYCLIC LOADING OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
FIGURE 3: Installationof geocomposite at time of track construction at Bulli site.
A typical plot of vertical cyclic stress transmitted to the ballast under an axle load of about 25 tons and a train speed of about 60 km/h is shown in Figure 4. While most of the maximum vertical cyclic stresses were under 230 kPa, one peak reached 415 kPa. This high magnitude of stress was associated with a wheel flat, which proved that large dynamic impact stresses can be generated in the ballast by wheel imperfections. This fact should be carefully assessed and accounted for in the design and maintenance of ballasted track beds.
FIGURE 5: Reinforcement of track substructure with different types of synthetic materials.
of stiffness (Figure 5). Permanent and transient strains in the ballast, together with the variation in the vertical stresses, were routinely monitored. Strain gauges were used to study the deformations and mobilised forces along the geogrid layers (Figure 6). An elasto-plastic finite element model of a composite multi-layer track system has been developed (Figure 7), and its predictions compared with observed behaviour (Figure 8). The model uses a special modified flow rule that considers the energy consumption due to particle breakage during shear deformations:
Field Tests on Instrumented Track at Singleton, NSW

To investigate the performance of different types of geosynthetics and to improve the overall track stability under field conditions, an extensive study is being undertaken on instrumented track sections near Singleton, NSW. Nine fully instrumented experimental track sections were constructed on three subgrades with distinctly different values
FIGURE 4: Cyclic stresses induced by coal train with wagons.
FIGURE 6: Installation of strain gauges at Singleton.

ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS CYCLIC LOADING OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE 79
FIGURE 7: FE mesh discretisation of a rail track.
The slight deviation between the FE predictions and the field data, shown in Figure 8, is partially due to the fact that the wheel loading is approximated by an equivalent plane strain analysis in the FE studies. Nevertheless, considering the limitations of the constitutive model, this level of agreement is encouraging and will help improve practical track design.
FIGURE 8: Comparison of vertical displacement (Sv) with FE predictions.
80
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report SELECTED RESEARCH PROJECTS CYCLIC LOADING OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE
ANNUAL WORKSHOP
Following an open invitation, Centre delegates gathered in Newcastle on 14 and 15 February 2011 for the first annual workshop. The workshop provided an opportunity for staff and students from each node to present current research and discuss plans for future collaborative projects. The two-day programme consisted of opening comments by Scott Sloan, twenty-eight technical presentations, closing comments by Mark Cassidy and coordinated social events including a workshop dinner and a surf session at Newcastle Beach. Amid numerous informal discussions between Centre delegates, technical presentations by researchers and students were given over the course of the following seven sessions: 1. Soil-structure interaction. 2. Submarine landslides/numerical methods. 3. Soft soils. 4. Geomaterials modelling/renewable energy. 5. Pipelines/geomaterials modelling. 6. Centrifuge modelling/soil-structure interaction. 7. Risk, failure, fatigue and tectonics.
Above: Jim Hambleton presenting a paper.
Proceedings of the workshop were kept in the form of a printed book of abstracts and an electronic collection of presentation slides. The number of attendees from each node is outlined below:
UoN Research ECRs Student Technical Coffey Douglas 7 3 3 2 UWA 6 4 5 -
UoW
3 1 -
Industry
2 2
Total
15
15
L-R: Dave White, Richard Merifield, Mark Cassidy, Scott Sloan, Christophe Gaudin and Mehrdad Kimiaei.
Above: RHD students Omid Kardani and Xue Zhang.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report ANNUAL WORKSHOP
81
WEBSITE
Dom Sammut, Web Developer at The University of Newcastle, designed the CGSE logo and website http://www.newcastle.edu.au/research-centre/cgse/ which went live on 22 November 2011. Since its inception, 120 pages have been viewed a total of 11,872 times, and the site typically attracts around 300 unique visitors per day.
CONTRIBUTION TO THE NATIONAL BENEFIT
With a forecast investment of over 250 billion dollars in Australias energy and transport infrastructure over the next five years, there is an unprecedented need to design and build this infrastructure as cheaply and safely as possible. In light of the size of the investment involved, even small percentage savings resulting from scientific research will lead to large returns in absolute dollar terms. By combining the strengths of three of Australias leading geotechnical research groups, the CGSE will provide engineers with new science-based tools for predicting the safety of offshore and onshore geostructures such as oil and gas platforms, roads, railways, tunnels, dams, and port facilities.
82 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report WEBSIT/CONTRIBUTION TO THE NATIONAL BENEFIT
CENTRE PERFORMANCE
30 JUNE 2011 - 31 DECEMBER 2011
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report CENTRE PERFORMANCE
83
STANDARD PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

KEY RESULT AREA 2011 TARGET 2011 ACTUAL
PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Number of research outputs: Journal papers Conference papers
80 (total)
122 84
Quality of research outputs: Ratio of journal to conference papers Percentage of papers in A/A* journals Research Findings Number of invited talks/papers/keynote lectures given at major international meetings
1:1 75%
1.45:1 79%
13
Number of commentaries about the Centres achievements: Media releases Articles Number of attended professional training courses for staff and postgraduate students: Presentations at national and international conferences and workshops Internal training courses
3 2
12 14
6 4
22 2
Research training and professional education
Number of Centre attendees at all professional training courses: Presentations at national and international conferences and workshops Internal training courses
15 5
83 12
Number of new postgraduate students working on core Centre research and supervised by Centre staff (including PhD, Masters by research and Masters by Coursework)
15
84
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report CENTRE PERFORMANCE STANDARD PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KEY RESULT AREA
PERFORMANCE MEASURE Number of new postdoctoral researchers recruited by the Centre working on core Centre research. Number of new Honours students working on core Centre research and supervised by Centre staff: Supervision of final year project students
2011 TARGET
2011 ACTUAL
10
54
Research training and professional education
Number of Early Career Researchers (within five years of completing PhD) working on core Centre research (cumulative) Number of students mentored: Undergraduates Postgraduates Number of mentoring programs: Oral Presentation skills, technical writing skills, grant writing skills Number of international visitors and visiting fellows
10 5
59 43
20
10 1 10 3 200 5 1 5 1
47 1 34 14 7,611 17 7 1
International, national and regional links and networks
Number of national and international workshops held/organised by the Centre Number of visits to overseas laboratories and facilities Number of government, industry and business community briefings
End-user links
Number of website hits Number of public talks given by Centre staff
Organisational support Integration of Australian geotechnical research
Number of new organisations collaborating with, or involved in, the Centre Multi-noded authorship of publications Multi-noded supervision of PhD Students
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report CENTRE PERFORMANCE STANDARD PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
85
FINANCIAL REPORT
FUNDING INCOME
ARC CGSE Grant Income ARC CGSE ECR Awards Institutional Cash Contribution Partner Organisation Funds Partner Organisation Funds Partner Organisation Funds Coffey Geotechnics Douglas Partners Advanced Geomechanics $2,133,075 $1,242,445 $1,025,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $500,000
NSW Science Leveraging Fund (SLF)
Total Funding Income (a)
$5,050,520
INCOME DISTRIBUTION BY UNIVERSITY

University of Newcastle University of Western Australia University of Wollongong $2,610,068 $1,381,557 $1,058,895
Total
$5,050,520
EXPENDITURE
Salaries Scholarships Equipment Consumables (Maintenance) Travel Other $754,307 $169,230 $214,679 $131,681 $133,448 $91,384
Total Expenditure (b) Surplus/(Deficit) (a)-(b) CARRIED FORWARD TO 2012
$1,494,729 $3,555,791 $3,555,791
86
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report FINANCIAL REPORT
87
OTHER INCOME
NEWSYD TU Hamburg-Harburg TU Hamburg-Harburg The Lloyds Register Educational Trust (LRET) Institutional Cash Contribution to The LRET WA ERA CLP Power Hong Kong Industry Component LP0989433 University of Maine Inpex Subsea 7 Industry Component LP110100174 Industry Component LP110200447 Industry Component LP100200265 Industry Component LP100100236 Industry Component LP0883244 Institutional Cash Contribution Laureate Fellowship Atkins Boreas BP Woodside Total Other Income (d) TOTAL OTHER INCOME (c)+(d) In situ soil testing Investigate the tendency for pile plugging during installation, depending on the installation method and relative sand density Investigate the tendency for pile displacement accumulation, when subjected to varying cyclic loading. Model the geotechnical behaviour of offshore foundations and predicting the risk of their failure Model the geotechnical behaviour of offshore foundations and predicting the risk of their failure Marine Geohazards Instrumentation System for Suction Caissons A novel foundation to extend the operation of mobile structures into deeper waters Design of mooring systems for floating offshore wind turbines. Centrifuge modelling of Gas Export Pipeline-soil interaction Mudmat Design under general multi-dimensional loading Estimation of spudcan penetration resistance in stratified soils directly from field penetrometer data and quantification of punch-through risk. Cyclic Behaviour of Unstable Soils Stabilised by Lignosulfonate with Special Reference to Rapid Transport Infrastructure Geotechnical Properties and Compaction Characteristics of Granular Wastes as Potential Port Reclamation Fill Study of Coupled Water-Gas-Sediment (three-phase) Flows through Jointed and Stratified Rock Advancement of Vacuum Pressure Application via Prefabricated Vertical Drains for Stabilising Soft Ground Failure Analysis of Geotechnical Infrastructure Axial and lateral pipe-soil interaction within the SAFEBUCK GEO JIP Centrifuge modelling of pipe-soil interaction Centrifuge modelling of lateral pipe-soil interaction Bates Bienen Bienen Cassidy Cassidy Cassidy Gaudin Gaudin & Cassidy Gaudin & Cassidy Gaudin & White Gourvenec & Randolph Hossain, Randolph & Cassidy Indraratna Indraratna Indraratna Indraratna Sloan White White & Gaudin White & Gaudin $208,512 $23,422 $10,000 $359,302 $300,000 $158,735 $31,000 $27,500 $31,750 $182,180 $22,880 $50,480 $70,000 $70,000 $25,000 $75,000 $300,000 $88,985 $331,325 $331,250 $2,697,321
$4,860,841
TOTAL INCOME FROM ALL SOURCES (a)+(c)+(d)

88 ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report FINANCIAL REPORT
$9,911,361
IN KIND SUPPORT
In Kind Support In Kind Support n Kind Support In Kind Support University Partner Organisations Colorado School of Mines Local Government (Ballina Bypass) $1,096,623 $128,800 $18,388 $5,000
Total In Kind Support
$1,248,811
89
90
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering (GSE) 2011 Financial Statement
Research Project: Project ID: Director: Administering Institution: Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering CE110001009 Laureate Professor Scott Sloan University of Newcastle University of Newcastle University of Western Australia University of Wollongong Sub Total Total
INCOME:
Bal Brought Fwd ARC CoE Income 2011 Bal Brought Fwd ARC CoE DECRA Income 2011 Bal Brought Fwd Cash Contributions 2011 Bal Brought Fwd Industry Partner Contributions Bal Brought Fwd NSW Science Leverage Fund (SLF) Total Available ARC CoE GSE Available Funds: 1,039,874 570,194 500,000 100,000 400,000 2,610,068 906,557 425,000 50,000 1,381,557 100,000 1,058,895 186,644 672,251 100,000 2,133,075 1,242,445 1,025,000 150,000 500,000 5,050,520 2,133,075 1,242,445 1,025,000 150,000 500,000 5,050,520
EXPENDITURE:
Salaries Scholarships Equipment Consumables (Maintenance) Travel Other
Total of All Institution's Expenditure 2011:
362,384 181,533 131,681 28,747 704,345 1,905,723
297,180 169,230 33,146 104,588 91,384 695,528 686,029
94,743 113 94,856 964,039
754,307 169,230 214,679 131,681 133,448 91,384 1,494,729 3,555,791 1,494,729 3,555,791
Surplus/(Deficit)
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report FINANCIAL STATEMENT
91
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering (GSE) 2011 Financial Statement
Research Project: Project ID: Director: Administering Institution: Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering CE110001009 Laureate Professor Scott Sloan University of Newcastle University of Newcastle University of Western Australia University of Wollongong Sub Total Total
SUMMARY AND RECONCILIATION:

Total ARC CoE Funds Provided to GSE 2011 Less: GSE Expenditure applied to ARC funds 2011 Net ARC CoE GSE Total ARC CoE DECRA Funds Provided to GSE 2011 Less: GSE DECRA Expenditure applied to ARC funds 2011 Net ARC CoE GSE DECRA
1,039,874 (197,729) 842,145 570,194 (6,615) 563,578
906,557 (695,528) 211,029 -
186,644 (94,856) 91,788 672,251 672,251
2,133,075 (988,114) 1,144,961 1,242,445 (6,615) 1,235,829 1,235,829 2,380,791 1,144,961
TOTAL ARC Funds to be Carried Forward

Cash Contributions 2011 Less: GSE Expenditure 2011 Charged to Cash Contributions Net Cash Contributions Industry Contributions 2011 Less GSE Expenditure 2011 Charged to Industry Contributions Net Industry Contributions NSW SLF Contributions 2011 Less GSE Expenditure 2011 Charged to NSW SLF Contributions Net NSW SLF Contributions
500,000 (500,000) 100,000 100,000 400,000 400,000
425,000 425,000 50,000 50,000 -
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
1,025,000 (500,000) 525,000 150,000 150,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,175,000 3,555,791 150,000 525,000
TOTAL NON ARC Funds to be Carried Forward ARC CoE GSE NET POSITION TO CARRY FORWARD INTO 2012
This special purpose financial statement combines the financial statements for the ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering (GSE) from the three collaborative Universities named above. The financial statements provided by the University of Wollongong and the University of Western Australia have both been signed off by their relevant finance department representatives in addition to their collaborative chief investigator in assurance of the financial information provided. The financial information provided by the University of Newcastle is a complete extract from the cost collectors created for GSE within the University's ledger. These transactions have been accounted for in accordance with applicable Australian Accounting Standards with the exception of capital purchases which are expensed for the purposes of acquitting ARC funds. All collaborative GSE University partners have thier annual financial report audited by their respective State Auditor General on a calendar year basis.
Damien Ryan
Senior Research Accountant The University of Newcastle Date: 27/03/12
92
ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science & Engineering 2011 Annual Report FINANCIAL STATEMENT
2 of 2

2011 Cgse Annual Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2011 Cgse Annual Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ARC Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering

2011 ANNUAL REPORT

ENQUIRIES AND FURTHER INFORMATION

[86] FINANCIAL REPORT [91] FINANCIAL STATEMENT

PHYSICAL MODELLING TECHNIQUES

Optimisation and adaptive methods, Computational contact mechanics, Computational homogenisation

Robust computational methods; analysis techniques & software packages

Direct design: in situ model tests, intelligent site characterisation

Above: Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering fundamental science.

MARK CASSIDY FTSE

JOHN CARTER AM AM FAA FTSE

BUDDHIMA INDRARATNA FTSE

MARK RANDOLPH FAA FBE FREng FTSE

HARRY POULOS AM, FAA, FTSE, Hon FIEAust, Dist MASCE

MUHAMMAD SHAZZAD HOSSAIN

SANJAY SHRAWAN NIMBALKAR

The University of Western Australia

MS HANA ABU ZAHER

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

M Eng (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

Interpretation of in situ test results Supervisors: Stephen Fityus, Emoke Imra

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

Modelling of pipeline seabed interactions Supervisors: Dave White, Mark Randolph

MR NING (STEVEN) CHENG

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

MR MOHAMMAD OMID KARDANI

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

PhD (Civil Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

MRS DIVYA SALLIYIL KODAKKATTU MANA

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

MR MOHAMMAD SAEED MASOOMI

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

MR MOHAMMAD HESAM MOAVENIAN

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

MR MATHARAGE DARSHANA ANURADHA PERERA

PhD (Civil Engineering)

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

MR HAMED MAHMOODZADEH POORNAKI

PhD (Civil Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil, Surveying & Environmental Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

To be advised Supervisor: Mark Randolph

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

PhD (Civil & Resource Engineering)

MR FIRMAN RAYBAT SIAHAAN

PhD (Civil Engineering)

PhD (Civil Engineering)