A Summary of Ralph D.

Winters Warfare Missiology

compiled by Beth Snodderly

The Tension and the Strategy

ll my life I have assumed that the big tension is between human beings and God. Since Adam fell out with God, his entire lineage has been estranged and needs reconciliation through the blood of Christ. But the larger picture is that the biggest tension is not between humans and God but between vicious, hideous plotting evil and God. Humans were then created to be on Gods side in that conflict with evil.
The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:8).

things that way. Furthermore, where there is confusion about whether evil is from God or not, our power in evangelism and missions is greatly weakened. An example of our confusion about what is evil and what is not is how we view the pervasive violence and suffering in nature. Unlike Luther and Calvin, we now know that nature includes all of the invading viruses, bacteria, and parasites. Many shrug their shoulders and say that God has simply decided to create the world in this way. The violence at both the microbiological and visible levels in nature is accepted as being Gods will. Yet in the very first chapter of the Bible both the animal life and humans mentioned there are clearly described as non-carnivorous, meaning that they did not kill each other (Genesis 1:29). In the future, that will also be the case when
the wolf will live with the lamb, the infant will play near the hole of the cobra and the young child put his hand into the vipers nest. They will neither harm nor destroy on all my holy mountain, for the earth will be full of the knowledge of the Lord as the waters cover the sea (Isaiah 11:8, 9).

I think we need to speak of four levels of strategy and purpose, whether in reaching the unreached or in evangelizing within our own culture: Level 1: Getting people saved Level 2: Winning them to the Lordship of Christ and into His family Level 3: Glorifying God Level 4: Fighting the works of the devil as a means of glorifying God. That is, understanding the lordship of Christ as involving us in an all-out war against evil, disease, and corruption. This is a war in which we can expect suffering, hardship and death.

Obstacles:

What is evil and where does it come from?

A major obstacle in reclaiming Gods glory is that much of the evil in this world is not known to be evil, but merely the way things are, as if God created
Lecture notes. Used with permission.

Violence in nature is not Gods plan. But lack of explanation for pervasive violence keeps thousands of intelligent people away from faith. If we are to glorify God, is it not essential to free Him from the accusation that He, not Satan, is the author of evil? A great deal of evil in this world is blamed on God. How attractive is our invitation to people to return to and yield to their Father in heaven if they continue to believe that he is the one who contrives for most everyone to die in suffering? Unless Satan is in the picture and we are known to be fighting his deadly works, we are allowing Gods glory to be marred and torn down.

33

34

A Summary of Ralph D. Winters Warfare Missiology

Theories on Genesis 1

To understand how we have come to the place of attributing violence in nature to God, it is necessary to go back to Genesis 1. If I can help people clear up a long-standing misunderstanding of the first chapter of the Bible, I hope they will be able to see that once we are saved, our mission is to participate wholeheartedly and without reservation in an onslaught against Satan and his works. We are not called to simply lie back and await the reward of heaven. All my life I had assumed, along with most casual readers of Genesis in English, that Genesis 1:1 refers to the creation of the universe. However, if this was the case, then the universe must have been created only recently. Meanwhile, during my lifetime, thousands of intelligent observers have been studying the earth and have continued to dig up bones of huge violent creatures that seem to have lived a very long time ago. Even in my teens my Scofield Reference Bible had taken this apparent age of the earth, which is continuously attested to by science, into account by concluding that there was a gap between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. Today, however, that gap theory is seldom mentioned. The gap theory is not as popular anymore because there are problems with believing that when God created the universe He began with a situation that could be called destroyed and desolate (Genesis 1:2, Hebrew: tohu wabohu). More often people have interpreted this passage understanding the periods of time mentioned in terms of long days. They have concluded that the six days of creation were longer than 24 hours, perhaps millions of years. However, for me the chief problem in inserting all of the old earth into the long days of the first chapter of Genesis is that most of these old bones we have been digging up are bones of shockingly vicious and life-destroying creatures. If they were what were being created in those elongated days, then, why would the first chapter of Genesis repeatedly include the following statement, and God saw that it was good? Or why would we read at the end of the chapter that neither man nor beast was carnivorous but instead was only plant eating? The problem in interpretation here becomes so severe that in recent years many have decided to simply deny that there is any great age to all the millions of old bones that have been dug up. To proponents of the Young Earth theory, the bones only look old, and things like the

Grand Canyon did not take many years to form, but were formed almost overnight as a result of a global flood. However the Young Earth concept is the laughing stock of the entire secular world simply because evidence is growing stronger every day that the old bones we have dug up really are old. What I am suggesting here actually accepts the events of Genesis 1 and the 24 hour days of (re)creation as mentioned being only 6,000 years agoas well as the old earth before Genesis 1:1. However, whether the Earth is both old and young or either old or young we should be cautious in our assertions, for if one interpretation is presented as the only possible meaning of the Bible, and consequently is proven to be wrong, then the world will label the Bible wrong rather than the interpretation. This happened with Calvin and Luther who thought the Bible taught that the earth is the center of the universe. Because of erroneous assumptions like these made during the Reformation, scientists have claimed the Bible is wrong ever since. It is very likely that at the time that the book of Genesis came into being, people did not know they were living on a round ball hanging in space. When the ancients spoke of going to the ends of the earth, as in Isaiah 49:6, they were talking about their own known world. When they talked about the whole world they were talking about the world they knew, not about the entire planet. When they said the flood covered the world they were not talking about the entire planet. The ark thus contained all the animals in that area of the world to be destroyed, but not all of the other animals in the world, and certainly not dinosaurs, some of which were 100 feet long and weighed multiple tons. Thousands of intelligent investigators all over the world, Christian and non-Christian, have concluded that the earth is old, not just six thousand years old. If they are right, the question arises, Does the existence of an old earth indicate that the Bible is wrong? We surely dont believe the Bible was dictated by God, as has been alleged for the Muslims Quran and the Mormons Book of Mormon. We believe our Bible was written by human men inspired by God to write for human understanding in their time and place. That is why it behooves us to understand Bible times if we want to really understand the Bible and do it justice.

Dr. Winter on Genesis 1: The Battle

Now the reason this issue is important to me and to a better understanding of the Christian mission is simple.

Beth Snodderly, comp. 35

If ...in a vastly earlier period of time before Genesis 1:1, Satan turned against God and distorted Gods good creation into the incredible suffering and violence we still see all throughout nature, if...Satan has from that time been the perverter of microbes into deadly germs such that all forms of life suffer from microbiological attack if... all this occurred before Genesis 1:1 then the events of Genesis chapter one may well display the relatively recent recreation of plant-eating animals and humans in their original God-designed form. This act of re-creation can be seen as the establishment of a new beachhead intended to assist in the defeat of Satan and the restoration of all creation. However, Genesis explains that almost immediately thereafter, Satan (who already had a long crime record) also penetrated Eden and brought down the newly created humans and the new beginning of undistorted animal life. Ever since this time, humans and animals have been born genetically perverted along with all the rest of nature. As a result, the new forms of life created in Gods image in Genesis 1 are victims of Satan and now are in dire need of salvation themselves. This salvation and redemption must be accomplished for these beings before they can work effectively with God in the defeat of Satan. The Cross was then the turning point in the battle against Satan. The Bible says, The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil (1 John 3:8). Jesus had a job to do; he dealt a definitive blow against Satan. But, the war is not over yet. Jesus said, as the Father sent me, so send I you. The immense tragedy is that the entire Christian world has been significantly duped by Satan, and has only vaguely understood this larger mission. The war against evil and against things that tear down our understanding of God is still going on. All over the earth people

are dying prematurely in suffering and pain due to an onslaught from the microbiological world. This is a world which we are only beginning to understand and which no one has understood theologically. It is not God that is inflicting the casualties, but the enemy. Lets not be confused about this fact of Gods innocence and let us not stand idle and inactive in this war!

Conclusion

Gregory Boyd has said, To follow Jesus is to do battle with the ever-present prince of darkness. (Boyd 1997:280) It is not a coincidence that the unreached areas of the world, where the Bible has had the least influence, overlap with those areas where there is the most suffering, disease, war and poverty (Myers 1996). These manifestations of evil are the works of the devil. A medical missionary to India from 1939-1969 wrote in his journal,
this kingdom of disease, death, ignorance, prejudice, fear, malnutrition and abject poverty is most surely a kingdom which ought to be overthrown by the Kingdom of our God. (Rees 2003)

The Kingdom of God began striking back when God gave the Great Commission to Abraham in Genesis 12:3. As Abrahams children, we have inherited the family responsibility of Gods concerns and purposes, which are to become our concerns and purposes. It is not to seek high pay or perks, but the war that must be won! Our lives and careers need to yield to this warfare reality.

References Cited

Boyd, Gregory A. 1997 God at War: The Bible and Spiritual Conflict. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press. Myers, Bryant L. 1996 The New Context of World Mission. Monrovia, CA: MARC. Rees, D. Ben, ed. 2003 Vehicles of Grace and Hope: Welsh Missionaries in India 18001970. Pasadena: William Carey Library.