Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON TENSES MASTERY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP 1 SUBOH IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2006 2007
writing English sentence. Because in writing a paragraph we must composed group of sentence, the structure is very important to be studied to make a good sentences in the paragraph. In learning English, one of difficult things to learn is grammar in cluding tenses. In other words, to master English the students should understand the rules of tenses. So, the students can improve the four English skill. It means that tenses mastery is needed in learning the four English skills. This research focus on the use of simple present, simple past, present continuous, and future tense. The reason to choose those tenses is because the tenses are the basic skills to write in English and how to students use the tenses in daily life practically. This study was intended to know the students tenses mastery after they had learned the grammar and structure materials, and to know the method for teaching tenses about the simple present, simple past, present continuous, and future tense from the English teacher.
The scope of this study are simple present, simple past tense, present continuous, future tense and the writers give limitation on the second years of SMP 1 SUBOH.
3.1.
ENGLISH TENSES
This chapter presents the literature riview related to the research problem. The theory riviewed cover the simple present, simple past, present continous, and future tenses, tenses mastery assessment and the significance of the tenses mastery. According to Hornby say that: The word tenses stands for a verb forms or series of verb used to express time relation. (1974: 891) Widarso and Mariani stated that: A tenses is a verb forms that express when the event or action happens. (1994:149) So from two statements above are, tenses may indicated wheter an action, activity or state is in present, past or an activity in future or in progress over a period of time. There are sixteen types of tenses and this research, four types of the tenses were used. They are simple present, simple past, simple past, present continousand future tenses. The reason of choosing the four types of tenses is that are the material of grammer and structure as steted in the 2004 english curriculum for the students of the junior hight school, especially the second year students. The four type of tenses have been learned by the students since the first year by the English teacher.
3.1.
In giving assessment, itis suggested to us to use meaningful exchanges in grammatical forms. In order to make sure that young learners use language in meaningful ways, we must remember to combine form and context. For example, students can tell about personal experiences in order to use verb in the appropriate tense. At the end of teaching, the teacher give them the formal rule of each structure and gets them to compare it with the rule they have generated. If useful, the students can also work at correcting some of the errors they have produced while covering the material in the unit.learners who do such activities can remember and apply well the grammar they learn. By knowing those characteristics of testing grammar, the techniques of teaching for the students of junior hight school should be carefully selected. They should be suitable with the childrens phychological development and also with their interest. For example, the teacher uses media to make the teaching learning process more fun. Also, an English teacher plays more an important role in English instructions. Therefore, an English teacher should have qualities in teaching English Gill and Crocker (1999:111) said that teachers should be able to: 1) Understand and appreciate their pupils use of language 2) Contribute to the development of their pupils language competence 3) Choose appropriate methods of teaching 4) Evaluate language text, schemes, programmes and equipments
3.1.
students are expected to be able speak and communicate in standard english grammatically. They can compose simple text in narative form, poem, and dialogues. The other skill can be found is students also learn how to use tenses verb in order to compose simple quistions, expressions, dialogues when they talk. Of chourse, students have to know when the action happen. Besides that, learning English tenses and master it, it will guide the students how to make correction of wrong sentences made by a speaker or may be found in English text. They can make correction for his/her friends who make errors in applying structure of sentences especilly in using tenses. Therefore, to understand the grammar appropriately the students must to have a mastery of them. Because the mastery of grammar support the mastery of the four basic competences of language skills, namely listening, speaking, reading and writing competence.
3.1.
TENSES
MASTERY
AS
STATED
IN
THE
3.2.
3.3.
teacher. Hughes (1989:10) states that achievement test is directly related to language course, the purpose is to establish how sucessful individual students, group of students, or the courses themselvest have been in achieving objectives. The tenses test are made by the researcher. Based on the scoring procedure, test can be devided into objective and subjective test. Hughes (1989:19) state that if no judgement is required on the part of the score, the scoring is objective. If judgementis called for, the scoring is said to be subjective. The test used in this research is objective test.
3.4.
RESEARCH INSTRUMENT
1) Instrument The procedures of developing instrument are as follows: (1) Determining test objectives and scope, (2) Selecting test format, (3) Developing test items or each item, (4) Scoring the test, (5) Trying out the test, (6) Reporting the result of try out to find difficult level, discriminating power, validity and reliability of the test. The test objective here is to know how far is the second year students master their tenses. The tenses mastery cover the simple present, simple past, present continuous and future tense. The test consists of 40 items and divide into 10 items of the simple present, 10 items of simple past, 10 items of present continuous, and 10 items of simple future tense.the students are asked to use or choose the verb or to be and use adverb of time into the correct tenses form. 2) Item Analysis To know whether a test is good or not, the researcher is counting the difficulty level (DL) and discriminating power (DP) of each item. The writer arranges that result of the test into two groups. They are upper and lower group. The difficult level is obtained by adding the total number of correct answer of upper group and lower group. Then it is devided with the total number of upper group and lower group
The discriminating power is obtained reducing the total number of correct answers of upper group and lower group. Then it is devided with the total number of upper group and lower group 3) Validity ot the Test The tenses materials are stated in the 1994 English curriculum and the 2004 curriculum for the junior high school. Therefore, this test is valid since it used content validity. Meanwhile, Hughes (1989:42) states that a valid test must provide consistently accurate measurements. It must reliable. It means that a valid test must be reliable as well. The content or curriculum validity of the tenses materials No 1 2 3 4 Tenses Material Simple Present Tense Simple Past Tense Simple continuous tense Simple Future Tense Item Number 1 10 11 12 21 30 31 40
3.5.
1) Scoring the students results of the simple present, simple past, present continuous, of future tenses 2) Analyzing the collected main data by the percentage formula above 3) Describing the results of the data analysis to answer the research problems 4) Classifying the results of the data analysis based on on the classification of the score levels presented. The classification of the score levels from depdikbud (1994 : 10) Score 96% - 100% 86% - 95% 76% - 85% 66% - 75% 56% - 65% 46% - 55% Category Excelent Very good Good More than fair Fair Poor
10
REFERENCES
Ali, M. 1993. Strategi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Angkasa Arikunto, S. 1993. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek Edisi, Revisi V. Jakarta: Rineke Cipta. Ary, D, Jacobs LC and Razavieh, A. 1979. Introduction to Research: Second Edition. London: the University Of New England. Azar, BS. 1993. Understading and Using English Grammar. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara. Brown, W. And Yule, G. 1995. Teaching the spoken Language. New York Cambridge University Press. Burhan, N. 2002. Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta: PT. BPFE-Yogyakarta. Depdibud. 1993. Kurikulum Pendidikan Dasar: GBPP SLTP Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Depdiknas. 2003. Kurikulum 2004 Bahasa Inggris SMP. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Gill, M. And Crocker, WJ. 1977. Engglish in Teacher Education. British: the University of New England. Hornby, S.1974. Oxford advanced Learner s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press. Hughes, A. S. 1989. Testing for Language Teacher. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kon, TS. 1993. Practional English Usage:English as a Second Language, Book 5. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara. Murcia, MC. And Olshtain, E. 2000. Discourse and Context in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press. Purwanto, N. 2000. Prinsip-prinsip dan tehnik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: PT. RemajaRosdakarya. Rusli, SR. 1998. Bahasa Inggris I. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Suryabrata, S. 1983. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali. Widarso, W. And Mariani, L. 1994. Comlete English Gramma . Yogyakarta Kanisius.
11