UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use. Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND (Preparing Activity) AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER

Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/) Change No. Date Location

This UFC supersedes UFC 3-301-01, dated 27 January 2010 with change 3 of 31 January 2012.

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 FOREWORD

The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.) Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable. UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact the preparing service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supporting rationale should be sent to the respective service proponent office by the following electronic form: Criteria Change Request. The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed below. UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following source: Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/. Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current. AUTHORIZED BY:

JAMES C. DALTON, P.E.

Chief, Engineering and Construction U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

JOSEPH E. GOTT, P.E.

Chief Engineer Naval Facilities Engineering Command

SCOTT HARTFORD, Colonel, USAF, P.E. Director Facilities Engineering Center of Excellence AF Civil Engineer Center

MICHAEL McANDREW
Director, Facilities Investment and Management Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment)

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) REVISION SUMMARY SHEET Subject: UFC 3-301-01, Structural Engineering Cancels: UFC 3-301-01, Structural Engineering dated 27 January 2010 with change 3 of 31 January 2012 Description of Changes: This UFC adopts the structural design provisions of the 2012 International Building Code (IBC 2012) for use in DoD building design and renovation. Live load table is updated to coordinate with IBC 2012. Site-specific structural load data tables for wind are updated to the ultimate design wind speed values from IBC 2012 which are the basic wind speed values from ASCE/SEI 710. Site-specific structural load data tables for seismic ground motion parameters are updated to the risk-adjusted maximum considered earthquake values and include the peak ground accelerations from ASCE/SEI 7-10. Reasons for Changes: The updated UFC is designed to be consistent with and to supplement the guidance contained in IBC 2012 as modified by UFC 1-200-01. Impact: There are negligible cost impacts. However, the following benefit should be realized: Load tables ensure that the locations identified and the loadings described are complete and current with the most up-to-date available information. DoD structural design criteria are current with industry codes and standards.

Non-Unified Items: This document contains no non-unified items

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1-1 1-2 1-3 1-4 1-4.1 1-4.2 1-4.3 1-5 2-1 2-1.1 2-1.2 2-1.3 2-1.4 2-1.5 2-1.6 2-1.7 2-2 2-2.1 2-2.2 2-2.3 2-2.4 2-3 2-3.1 2-3.2 2-4 2-4.1 2-4.2 2-4.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ........................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................ 1 APPLICABILITY ........................................................................................ 1 OTHER CRITERIA .................................................................................... 1 General Building Requirements ............................................................. 1 Seismic Design ...................................................................................... 2 Progressive Collapse ............................................................................. 2 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 16 - STRUCTURAL DESIGN .................................................. 3 Section 1603 - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS .................................. 3 Section 1604 - GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ......................... 3 Section 1607 - LIVE LOADS .................................................................. 9 Section 1608 - SNOW LOADS ............................................................ 10 Section 1609 - WIND LOADS .............................................................. 10 Section 1613 - EARTHQUAKE LOADS ............................................... 12 Section 1615 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY [Deletion]........................ 13 CHAPTER 17 - STRUCTURAL TESTS AND SPECIAL INSPECTIONS 13 Section 1701 - GENERAL ................................................................... 13 Section 1703 - APPROVALS ............................................................... 13 Section 1704 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY AND STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS................. 14 Section 1705 REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION........ 16 CHAPTER 18 - SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS ......................................... 18 Section 1808 - FOUNDATIONS........................................................... 18 Section 1809 - SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ........................................ 18 CHAPTER 19 - CONCRETE ................................................................... 18 Section 1901 GENERAL ................................................................... 18 Section 1904 - DURABILITY REQUIREMENTS .................................. 19 Section 1906 STRUCTURAL PLAIN CONCRETE ........................... 19 i

CHAPTER 2 MODIFICATIONS TO IBC ......................................................................... 3

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 2-4.4 2-5 2-5.1 2-5.2 2-5.3 2-6 2-6.1 2-6.2 2-6.3 2-6.4 Section 1907 - MINIMUM SLAB PROVISIONS ................................... 19 CHAPTER 21 - MASONRY ..................................................................... 25 Section 2101 - GENERAL ................................................................... 25 Section 2104 - CONSTRUCTION ........................................................ 25 Section 2109 - EMPIRICAL DESIGN OF MASONRY [Deletion].......... 26 CHAPTER 22 - STEEL ............................................................................ 26 Section 2204 - CONNECTIONS .......................................................... 26 Section 2205 - STRUCTURAL STEEL ................................................ 26 Section 2210 - COLD-FORMED STEEL .............................................. 26 Section 2211 - COLD-FORMED STEEL LIGHT-FRAMED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................ 27 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL ....................................................................... 29 1.3.1.3 Performance Based Procedures [Replacement] ................... 29 1.3.1.3.1 Analysis [Supplement] ....................................................... 29 1.3.1.3.3 Documentation [Replacement] ........................................... 29 CHAPTER 2 COMBINATIONS OF LOADS ......................................... 29 2.3.5 Load Combinations Including Self-Straining Loads [Supplement] ............................................................................................................. 29 2.4.4 Load Combinations Including Self-Straining Loads [Supplement] ............................................................................................................. 29 2.5.1 Applicability [Replacement] ...................................................... 29 2.5.2 Load Combinations [Deletion] .................................................. 30 2.5.3 Stability Requirements [Deletion] ............................................. 30 CHAPTER 7 SNOW LOADS ................................................................ 30 7.4 Sloped Roof Snow Loads [Supplement] ..................................... 30 CHAPTER 11 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA ....................................... 30 11.2 Definitions [Replacement] ......................................................... 30 CHAPTER 15 SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR NONBUILDING STRUCTURES ............................................................ 30 15.4.5 Drift Limitations [Supplement] ................................................ 30 HIGHWAY BRIDGE DESIGN .................................................................. 31 RAILROAD BRIDGE DESIGN ................................................................ 31 ii

CHAPTER 3 MODIFICATIONS TO ASCE/SEI 7 .......................................................... 29 3-1 3-1.1 3-1.2 3-1.3 3-2 3-2.1 3-2.2 3-2.3 3-2.4 3-2.5 3-3 3-3.1 3-4 3-4.1 3-5 3-5.1 4-1 4-2

CHAPTER 4 OTHER STRUCTURES ........................................................................... 31

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-9 4-10 TANKS FOR LIQUID STORAGE ............................................................ 31 TANKS FOR PETROLEUM STORAGE .................................................. 31 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONCRETE STRUCTURES ......... 31 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE TANKS .................................................... 31 WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES ........................................................ 31 TRANSMISSION TOWERS AND POLES ............................................... 31 ANTENNA TOWERS............................................................................... 31 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES ........................................................................ 31

APPENDIX A REFERENCES .................................................................................... 33 APPENDIX B BEST PRACTICES .............................................................................. 39 B-1 B-1.1 B-1.2 B-1.3 B-1.4 B-1.5 B-2 B-2.1 B-2.2 B-2.3 B-3 B-3.1 B-3.2 B-3.3 B-3.4 B-3.5 B-4 B-4.1 B-5 B-5.1 B-5.2 B-5.3 B-5.4 STRUCTURAL DESIGN ...................................................................... 39 Building Drift Limits .............................................................................. 39 Impact Resistant Glazing ..................................................................... 39 Hard Wall Buildings ............................................................................. 39 Wind and Seismic Loads on Photovoltaic Arrays................................. 40 Wind Loads on Buildings with Large Openings.................................... 40 SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS............................................................... 40 Gable Bent Footings ............................................................................ 40 Footings on Expansive Soils ................................................................ 40 Footings Depth Due to Frost ................................................................ 41 CONCRETE......................................................................................... 43 Slab-on-Ground Concrete Strength ..................................................... 43 Slab-on-Ground Control Joints ............................................................ 43 Slab-on-Ground Drying Shrinkage ....................................................... 43 Slab-on-Ground Vapor Retarder/Barrier .............................................. 43 Post Installed Adhesive Concrete Anchors .......................................... 43 MASONRY........................................................................................... 44 Masonry Veneer Base Detail ............................................................... 44 STEEL ................................................................................................. 44 Shelf Angles for Masonry ..................................................................... 44 Cold-Formed Continuous Beams and Joists ....................................... 44 Masonry Veneer/Steel Stud Wall Detailing .......................................... 44 Steel Structures in Corrosive Environments ........................................ 44 iii

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 B-5.5 B-5.6 B-5.7 B-6 B-6.1 Steel Structures in Arctic and Antarctic Zones ..................................... 45 Steel Column Base Plate Shear Transfer ............................................ 46 Steel Joist Connections ....................................................................... 46 Wood ................................................................................................... 46 Connections ......................................................................................... 46

APPENDIX C ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................ 47 APPENDIX D MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS, Lo, AND MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS ........................................ 51 D-1 REFERENCES. ................................................................................... 51 APPENDIX E SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS ........................................... 59 E-1 E-2 E-3 Wind Loading Data Table. ................................................................... 59 Snow Loading and Frost Penetration Data Table. ............................... 59 Earthquake Loading Data Table. ......................................................... 59

APPENDIX F SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS........... 105 F-1 F-2 F-3 Wind Loading Data Table. ................................................................. 105 Snow Loading and Frost Penetration Data Table. ............................. 105 Earthquake Loading Data Table. ....................................................... 105

APPENDIX G SEISMIC SPECTRAL ACCELERATION MAPS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS ........................................................................ 157 TABLES TABLE 2-1 LATERAL DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR FRAMING SUPPORTING EXTERIOR WALL FINISHES A,B,C .................................................................................. 5 TABLE 2-2 - RISK CATEGORY OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES ........... 6 TABLE 2-3 REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS* ................................................................................... 17 TABLE 2-4 - MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR WALL LOAD NEAR CENTER OF SLAB OR NEAR KEYED OR DOWELED JOINTS21 TABLE 2-5 - MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR WALL LOAD NEAR FREE EDGE ................................................................................ 22 TABLE D-1 MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS AND MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADSG ................................................................................ 51 iv

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE E-1 - WIND LOADING DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS ............................................................................................................ 59 TABLE E-2 - SNOW LOADING AND FROST PENETRATION DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS .................................................... 74 TABLE E-3 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS........................................................................... 87 TABLE F-1 - WIND LOADING DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS......................................................................... 106 TABLE F-2 SNOW LOADING AND FROST PENETRATION DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS............................ 119 TABLE F-3 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS .................................................. 131 FIGURES FIGURE 2-1 - WIDTHS OF THICKENED SLABS AND SLAB EDGE CONDITIONS UNDER WALL LOADS................................................................................................. 24 FIGURE B-1 DESIGN DEPTH OF BOTTOM OF BUILDING FOUNDATION ............ 42 FIGURE G-1 - AFGHANISTAN RISK-TARGETED MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION OF 0.2-SECOND SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING), SITE CLASS B ............................................................................................................... 157 FIGURE G-2 - AFGHANISTAN RISK-TARGETED MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION OF 1-SECOND SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING), SITE CLASS B ............................................................................................................... 158

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

This page intentionally left blank.

vi

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This Unified Facility Criteria (UFC) provides requirements for structures designed and constructed for the Department of Defense (DoD). These technical requirements are based on the 2012 International Building Code (IBC 2012), as modified by UFC 1-20001. This information shall be used by structural engineers to develop design calculations, specifications, plans, and design-build Requests for Proposal (RFPs). 1-2 BACKGROUND

UFC 1-200-01 uses and supplements IBC 2012 as the building code for DoD. Chapter 2 of this UFC further modifies the IBC for structural-specific design requirements and is organized by the chapter of IBC that each section modifies. Chapter 3 of this UFC further modifies ASCE/SEI 7-10 for structural-specific design requirements and is organized by the chapter of ASCE/SEI 7 that each section modifies. The climatic and seismic data included in this UFC are intended as a tool to assist in the consistent interpretation of the corresponding data in the IBC at significant DoD installations within the United States, and as the basis for applying the provisions of UFC 1-200-01 to significant DoD installations outside of the United States. Chapter 4 provides additional guidance for the design of structures other than buildings. The IBC 2012 and ASCE/SEI 7-10 section modifications are one of four actions, according to the following legend: [Addition] Add new section, including new section number, not shown in IBC 2012 or ASCE/SEI 7-10. [Deletion] Delete referenced IBC 2012 or ASCE/SEI 7-10 section. [Replacement] Delete referenced IBC 2012 or ASCE/SEI 7-10 section or noted portion and replace it with the narrative shown. [Supplement] Add narrative shown as a supplement to the narrative shown in the referenced section of IBC 2012 or ASCE/SEI 7-10. 1-3 APPLICABILITY

This UFC applies to all service elements and contractors involved in the planning, design and construction of DoD facilities worldwide. 1-4 OTHER CRITERIA

Military criteria other than those listed in this document may be applicable to specific types of structure. Such structures shall meet the additional requirements of the applicable military criteria. 1-4.1 General Building Requirements 1

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Comply with UFC 1-200-01, General Building Requirements. UFC 1-200-01 provides applicability of model building codes and government unique criteria for typical design disciplines and building systems, as well as for accessibility, antiterrorism, security, high performance and sustainability requirements, and safety. Use this FC in addition to UFC 1-200-01 and the UFCs and government criteria referenced therein. 1-4.2 Seismic Design

For seismic design of buildings, refer to UFC 3-310-04. 1-4.3 Progressive Collapse

For design of buildings to resist progressive collapse, refer to UFC 4-023-03. 1-5 REFERENCES

For references see Appendix A.

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 CHAPTER 2 MODIFICATIONS TO IBC 2-1 2-1.1 2-1.1.1 CHAPTER 16 - STRUCTURAL DESIGN Section 1603 - CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 1603.2 - Delegated Engineered Systems [Addition]

The engineer of record for a structure may delegate responsibility for the design of systems or component parts of the structure to a qualified delegated engineer. Both the engineer of record for the structure and the delegated engineer must comply with the requirements of this UFC. The following are some examples of delegated systems. a. Prefabricated wood components b. Cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete structural systems c. Precast, prestressed concrete components d. Open web steel joists and joist girders e. Pre-engineered metal buildings f. Specialty foundation systems g. Structural steel connections h. Cold-formed steel joist/stud/truss framing and pre-fabricated components i. j. Seismic anchorage of equipment Proprietary track for under-hung cranes and monorails

k. Autoclaved aerated concrete The delegated engineer must sign and seal all work they design. The structural engineer of record must review all submittals that have been signed and sealed by the delegated engineer, to verify compliance with the design intent and the specified design criteria and to ensure coordination with the contract documents and other shop drawings. All submittals from the delegated engineer must be approved by the engineer of record prior to the start of fabrication of the system or component part and prior to any field construction that may be affected by the system or component part. 2-1.2 2-1.2.1 Section 1604 - GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 1604.3 - Serviceability [Supplement]

The structural designer shall ensure that the maximum allowable frame drift is suitable for the proposed structure considering occupancy, use/function, and all details of 3

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 construction. See ASCE/SEI 7 Appendix C Serviceability Considerations including commentary, and Section B-1.1 of UFC 3-301-01 for additional guidance. In the wind design of a building or a non-building structure, the lateral drift shall not exceed H/480 based on a wind speed with a 10 year MRI. See Figure CC-1 of ASCE/SEI 7 for wind speeds with a 10 year MRI. Consideration shall be given to the cladding system when evaluating lateral drift as a more stringent drift limitation may be appropriate depending on the cladding system. Exception: The drift limits can be modified with concurrence/approval from the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Wall systems and other building elements that are not part of the lateral force resisting system shall be detailed to ensure that they are not susceptible to damage. Masonry and other brittle wall systems are particularly susceptible to damage if not properly integrated into the design to ensure that they can adequately resist the stresses resulting from the building deformations or are effectively isolated to prevent damage. Exception: Reinforced concrete frame members not designed as part of the seismic lateral force-resisting system shall comply with Section 21.13 of ACI 318. All structural vertical load bearing wall elements shall be considered to be part of the lateral force-resisting system. All applicable provisions of UFC 3-310-04 Table 2-1 shall apply. 2-1.2.2 1604.3.1 - Deflections [Replacement]

Deflections of structural members shall not exceed the more restrictive of the limitations of Sections 1604.3.2 through 1604.3.5 or those permitted by Table 1604.3, or Table 2-1 of UFC 3-301-01.

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE 2-1 LATERAL DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR FRAMING SUPPORTING EXTERIOR WALL FINISHES a,b,c Brick veneer Exterior Insulation Finish Systems Cement board Stone Masonry Plywood and Wood-Based Structural-Use Panels Gypsum sheathing Metal or vinyl siding L/600 L/240 L/360 VERIFY WITH STONE SUPPLIER L/240 L/240 L/240

Notes to Table 2-1, LATERAL DEFLECTION LIMITS FOR FRAMING SUPPORTING EXTERIOR WALL FINISHES a. Lateral deflection limits under wind loads or seismic displacements amplified per UFC 3-310-04 Table 2-1. b. The wind load is permitted to be taken as 0.42 times the component and cladding loads for the purpose of determining the deflection limits herein. c. L shall be calculated as L = k*l, where k is the theoretical effective length factor, and l is the actual member length. 2-1.2.3 1604.5 - Risk Category [Replacement]

Each building and structure shall be assigned a risk category in accordance with Table 2-2 of UFC 3-301-01. Where referenced standard specifies an occupancy category, the risk category shall not be taken as lower than the occupancy category specified therein. Importance factors for snow load, seismic load, and ice for each risk category are also shown in Table 2-2 of UFC 3-301-01. Note: IBC section 1604.5.1 shall remain in effect as written. 2-1.2.4 Table 1604.5 [Replacement]

Replace Table 1604.5 of the IBC with Table 2-2 of this UFC. (All references in the IBC to Table 1604.5 shall be interpreted as a reference to Table 2-2 of this UFC.)

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE 2-2 - RISK CATEGORY OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES
Risk Category

Nature of Occupancy Buildings and other structures that represent a low hazard to human life in the event of failure, including, but not limited to: Agricultural facilities Certain temporary facilities Minor storage facilities Buildings and other structures except those listed in Risk Categories I, III, IV and V Buildings and other structures that represent a substantial hazard to human life or represent significant economic loss in the event of failure, including, but not limited to: Buildings and other structures whose primary occupancy is public assembly with an occupant load greater than 300 people Buildings and other structures containing elementary school, secondary school, or daycare facilities with an occupant load greater than 250 Buildings and other structures containing adult education facilities, such as colleges and universities, with an occupant load greater than 500 Group I-2 occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more resident care recipients but not having surgery or emergency treatment facilities Group I-3 occupancies Any other occupancy with an occupant load greater a than 5,000 Power-generating stations; water treatment facilities for potable water, waste water treatment facilities, and other public utility facilities that are not included in Risk Categories IV and V Buildings and other structures not included in Risk Categories IV and V containing sufficient quantities of toxic, flammable, or explosive materials that: Exceed maximum allowable quantities per control area as given in Table 307.1(1) or 307.1(2) or per outdoor control area in accordance with NFPA 1, Fire Code; and are sufficient to pose a threat to the b public if released. Facilities having high-value equipment, as designated by the Authority Having Jurisdiction

Seismic Factor

Snow Factor

Ice Factor

IE

IS

Ii

1.00

0.8

0.80

II

1.00

1.00

1.00

III

1.25

1.10

1.25

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Risk Category

Nature of Occupancy Buildings and other structures designed as essential facilities, including, but not limited to: Group I-2 occupancies having surgery or emergency treatment facilities Fire, rescue, and police stations, and emergency vehicle garages Designated earthquake, hurricane, or other emergency shelters Designated emergency preparedness, communication, and operation centers, and other facilities required for emergency response Power-generating stations and other utility facilities required as emergency backup facilities for Risk Category IV structures. Buildings and other structures containing quantities of highly toxic materials that: Exceed maximum allowable quantities per control area as given in Table 307.1(1) or 307.1(2) or per outdoor control area in accordance with NFPA 1, Fire Code; and are sufficient to pose a threat to the b public if released. Air traffic control tower (ATCT), Radar Approach Control Facility (RACF) and air traffic control centers unless the Authority Having Jurisdiction determines that the facility is classified as a non-essential facility and is not required for post-earthquake operations (i.e. minor facility, availability of an alternate temporary control facility, auxiliary outlying field, etc.). Contact the Authority Having Jurisdiction for additional guidance. Emergency aircraft hangars that house aircraft required for post-earthquake emergency response; if no suitable back up facilities exist Buildings and other structures not included in Risk Category V, having DoD mission-essential command, control, primary communications, data handling, and intelligence functions that are not duplicated at geographically separate locations, as designated by the using agency Water storage facilities and pump stations required to maintain water pressure for fire suppression Facilities designed as national strategic military assets, including, but not limited to: Key national defense assets (e.g. National Missile Defense facilities), as designated by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Facilities involved in operational missile control, launch, tracking, or other critical defense capabilities Emergency backup power-generating facilities required for primary power for Category V occupancy Power-generating stations and other utility facilities required for primary power for Category V occupancy, if

Seismic Factor

Snow Factor

Ice Factor

IE

IS

Ii

IV

1.50

1.20

1.25

1.0

1.50

1.50

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Risk Category

Nature of Occupancy emergency backup power generating facilities are not available Facilities involved in storage, handling, or processing of nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological materials, where structural failure could have widespread catastrophic consequences, as designated by the Authority Having Jurisdiction.

Seismic Factor

Snow Factor

Ice Factor

IE

IS

Ii

Notes to Table 2-2, RISK CATEGORY OF BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES a. For purposes of occupant load calculations, occupancies required by Table 1004.1.2 to use gross floor area calculations shall be permitted to use net floor area to determine the total occupant load. b. Where approved by the building official, the classification of buildings and other structures as Risk Category III or IV based on their quantities of toxic, highly toxic or explosive materials is permitted to be reduced to Risk Category II, provided it can be demonstrated by hazard assessment in accordance with Section 1.5.3 of ASCE/SEI 7 that a release of the toxic, highly toxic or explosive material is not sufficient to pose a threat to the public. c. A Risk Category has been added to address national strategic military assets. Structures in this risk category are designed to remain elastic during the MCE. 2-1.2.5 1604.11 - Fall Prevention and Protection [Addition]

Fall prevention and protection measures shall be considered at a facility during occupancy and maintenance phases, or whenever there is a need or requirement to perform work at high locations, on equipment, near unprotected sides or edges, holes or openings, deliver material to or store equipment at heights as defined by the following: 29 CFR 1926, Subpart M, 29 CFR 1910, Subpart D Notices of Proposed Rulemaking, 29 CFR 1910 ANSI/ASSE A1264.1 ANSI/ASSE Z359

At the planning and design phase of a project, fall hazards shall be considered and eliminated whenever possible. Safe access to the work location at heights shall also be considered. When elimination or prevention of fall hazards is not feasible the design shall include certified and labeled anchorages that are conveniently located to perform the work safely. The anchorages shall meet the following requirements: 8

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 29 CFR 1926.500, Subpart M, Notices of Proposed Rulemaking, 29 CFR 1910 ANSI/ASSE Z359

Where fall protection is required in the vicinity of weight-handling equipment, care must be taken to prevent potential conflicts between the weight-handling equipment and the fall protection measures. 2-1.2.5.1 1604.11.1 Loads, Load Combinations and Impact [Addition]

For fall arrest loads, load combinations and impact factors to be used in the design of fall protection systems refer to ANSI/ASSE Z359 Fall Protection Code/Standards. 2-1.2.5.2 1604.11.2 - Additional Fall Protection Considerations [Addition]

The design for anchorages attached or embedded in concrete shall include both the static and the dynamic loads generated by the fall arrest system. 2-1.2.5.3 1604.12 - Expansion Joints [Addition]

Spacing of expansion joints shall follow the recommendations in NAS Technical Report No. 65. 2-1.3 Section 1607 - LIVE LOADS

Table D-1 of this UFC includes IBC Table 1607.1 with additional Occupancy or Use classifications for military facilities. The additional classifications that have been added to IBC Table 1607.1 are shown in bold italics within Table D-1. 2-1.3.1 1607.1 General [Replacement]

Live loads are those loads defined in Section 1602.1. Table D-1 of UFC 3-301-01 defines minimum uniformly distributed live loads and minimum concentrated live loads for the design of structures. 2-1.3.2 Table 1607.1 [Replacement]

Replace Table 1607.1 of the IBC with Table D-1 of this UFC. (All references in the IBC to Table 1607.1 shall be interpreted as a reference to Table D-1 of this UFC.) 2-1.3.3 1607.7.1 Loads [Replacement]

Where any structure does not restrict access for vehicles that exceed a 10,000 pound (4536 kg) gross vehicle weight rating, those portions of the structure subject to such loading shall be designed using the vehicular live loads, including consideration of impact and fatigue, in accordance with the AASHTO Bridge Design Specification. 2-1.3.4 1607.9.3 Hangers [Addition] 9

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 For the purpose of design, the live load on hangers supporting floors and balconies shall be increased by 33 percent to account for impact. 2-1.3.5 1607.11 Distribution of Floor Loads [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Partial floor live load distribution shall follow Section 4.3.3 of ASCE/SEI 7. 2-1.4 2-1.4.1 Section 1608 - SNOW LOADS 1608.4 - Specific Locations Within the United States [Addition]

Ground snow loads at DoD installations within the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table E-2 of UFC 3-301-01, to facilitate consistent interpretation of the information provided in Figure 1608.2 and Table 1608.2. 2-1.4.2 1608.5 - Specific Locations Outside of the United States [Addition]

Ground snow loads at specific locations outside of the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table F-2 of UFC 3-301-01. At locations where the ground snow load is not provided, use the best locally available information. For additional guidance contact the Authority Having Jurisdiction. 2-1.4.3 1608.6 - Snow Load Case Studies [Addition]

Snow load case studies may be done to clarify and refine snow loadings at site-specific locations with the approval of the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). For Risk Category V facilities or where required by the AHJ a site-specific study shall be conducted if the ground snow load is greater than 30 psf (1.4KPa). The methodology used to conduct snow load case studies at site-specific locations is presented in the Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) report Database and Methodology for Conducting Site Specific Snow Load Case Studies for the United States. 2-1.5 2-1.5.1 Section 1609 - WIND LOADS 1609.1.1 Determination of Wind Loads [Supplement]

Add the following to the list of exceptions: 7. For winds parallel to the ridge of open buildings, the wind load delivered to the main wind force resisting system from the bare frames or partially clad end walls shall be determined in accordance with Section 1.3.4.5.4 of the 2010 Supplement to the 2006 Metal Building System Manual. 2-1.5.2 1609.1.3 Aircraft Hangar Wind Loads [Addition]

Wind load on main wind force resisting system of aircraft hangars shall be determined based on the following conditions: 10

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Hangar doors closed for winds at the maximum design velocity. The structural forces shall be calculated based upon the assumption of a partially enclosed building. It is permissible to use the large volume reduction factor of ASCE/SEI 7 in determining the design wind pressures. It shall be assumed that a 1 inch (25 mm) strip around the perimeter of all hangar door panels is an opening and this shall be combined with the area of all unshielded fenestration. Hangar doors open to the maximum extent possible with a wind velocity of 60 mph (97 km/h). The structural forces shall be calculated upon the assumption of a partially enclosed building. Use the total open door area in the large volume reduction factor calculation. 1609.2 - Definitions [Replacement]

2-1.5.3

Replace the definition of Wind-Borne Debris Region in this section and section 202 of IBC with the following: WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGION. For locations within the United States and its territories and possessions, areas within hurricane-prone regions located: 1. Within 1 mile (1.61 km) of the coastal mean high water line where the ultimate design wind speed is 130 mph (58 m/s) or greater; or 2. In areas where the ultimate design wind speed is 140 mph (62.5 m/s) or greater; or Hawaii. For locations outside of the United States and its territories and possessions, regions where the ultimate design wind speed is 140 mph (63.6 m/s) or greater. For Risk Category II buildings and structures and Risk Category III buildings and structures, except health care facilities, the windborne debris region shall be based on Risk Category II wind speeds. For Risk Category IV buildings and structures and Risk Category III health care facilities, the windborne debris region shall be based on Risk Category III-IV wind speeds. For Risk Category V buildings and structure the windborne debris region shall be based on Risk Category V wind speeds. 2-1.5.4 1609.3 Basic Wind Speed [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: For Risk Category V facilities the ultimate design wind speed, Vult, should be determined in accordance with Section 26.5.3 of ASCE/SEI 7. 2-1.5.5 1609.3.1 - Specific Locations Within the United States [Replacement] Ultimate design wind speeds at DoD installations within the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table E-1 of UFC 3-301-01 to facilitate 11

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 consistent interpretation of the information provided in Figures 1609A, 1609B, and 1609C. To determine the wind speed at a specific location not included in Table E-1 use the web application on the Applied Technology Council website at http://www.atcouncil.org/windspeed/index.php 2-1.5.6 1609.3.2 - Specific Locations Outside of the United States [Addition]

Ultimate design wind speeds at specific locations outside of the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table F-1 of UFC 3-301-01. At locations where the ultimate design wind speed is not provided, use the best locally available information. For additional guidance, contact the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Use a minimum wind speed of 100 mph (161 km/h) for Risk Category I, 110 mph (177 km/h) for Risk Category II, 115 mph (185 km/h) for Risk Category III and IV or 140 mph (225 km/h) for Risk Category V at all locations unless a lower wind speed is approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. 2-1.5.7 1609.3.3 - Wind Speed Conversion [Addition]

When required, the ultimate design wind speed shall be converted to a nominal design wind speed, Vasd, using Equation 16-33a. Vasd=0.6Vult (Equation 16-33a)

When required, the ultimate design wind speed shall be converted to fastest-mile wind speeds, Vfm, using Equation 16-33b. Vfm=(0.6Vult-10.5)/1.05 where: (Equation 16-33b)

Vult = ultimate design wind speed determined from Figure 1609A. 2-1.6 2-1.6.1 Section 1613 - EARTHQUAKE LOADS 1613.3.1.1 - Specific Locations Within the United States [Addition]

Seismic parameters at DoD installations within the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table E-3 of UFC 3-301-01 to facilitate consistent interpretation of the information provided in Figures 1613.3.1(1) through 1613.3.1(6). The values in Table E-3 were determined utilizing the web-based United States Geological Survey (USGS) U.S. Seismic Design Maps Web Application, for ASCE 7-10 utilizing latitude and longitude data. This tool or other approved software may be used to determine seismic design data where site-specific location information is available, and with the approval of the Authority Having Jurisdiction. The seismic acceleration parameters in Table E-3 were typically determined at the approximate geographical centroid of the installation / city. For larger installations and 12

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 where the potential seismic accelerations vary considerably over relatively short distances, it may not be appropriate to use the acceleration values at the installation centroid. In Table E-3 the larger installations are identified and location specific seismic parameters for sites within the installation shall be determined using the USGS web application. For additional guidance contact the Authority Having Jurisdiction. 2-1.6.2 [Addition] 1613.3.1.2 - Specific Locations Outside of the United States

Seismic ground motion parameters at specific locations outside of the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table F-3 of UFC 3-301-01. For locations not shown, the best available information shall be used with the approval of the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Appendix G includes available seismic spectral acceleration maps at selected locations outside of the United States. These maps may be used to interpolate the seismic ground motions at locations that are not identified in Table F-3. 2-1.6.3 1613.5 Site Specific Seismicity Study Process [Addition]

The site specific ground motion procedures in Chapter 21 of ASCE/SEI 7 may be used to determine ground motions for any structure. 2-1.7 Section 1615 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY [Deletion]

This section shall be deleted in its entirety. 2-2 2-2.1 2-2.1.1 CHAPTER 17 - STRUCTURAL TESTS AND SPECIAL INSPECTIONS Section 1701 - GENERAL 1701.1 - Scope [Supplement]

Add the following paragraph after the first paragraph: Contractual relationships and the composition of the architect / engineer / construction (AEC) team differ from that contemplated by the language of IBC 2012, when doing DoD construction. When performing design or construction using typical methods for inhouse design, AE design, and contracting for construction, IBC 2012 /ASCE/SEI 7-10 terms of Authority Having Jurisdiction and Building Official shall be as defined in UFC 1200-01. 2-2.2 2-2.2.1 Section 1703 - APPROVALS 1703.4 - Performance [Replacement]

New, unusual, or innovative materials, systems or methods previously untried may be incorporated into designs when evidence shows that such use is in the best interest of the Government from the standpoint of economy, lower life-cycle costs, and quality of construction. Supporting data, where necessary to assist in the approval of materials or 13

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 assemblies not specifically provided for in the code, shall consist of valid evaluation reports from International Code Council Evaluation Services (ICC-ES), or other qualified testing and evaluation service with the prior approval of the Authority Having Jurisdiction. 2-2.2.2 1703.4.1 - Research and Investigation [Deletion]

This section shall be deleted in its entirety. 2-2.2.3 1703.4.2 - Research Reports [Deletion]

This section shall be deleted in its entirety. 2-2.3 Section 1704 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY AND STRUCTURAL OBSERVATIONS 2-2.3.1 1704.5 Structural Observations [Replacement]

Replace the first paragraph with the following: Where required by the provisions of Section 1704.5.1 or 1704.5.2, the contractor shall employ a registered design professional to perform structural observations as defined in Section 1702. 2-2.3.2 1704.5.1 Structural Observations for Seismic Resistance [Replacement] Replace item number one with the following: 1 - The structure is classified as Risk Category III, IV or V in accordance with Table 22.Replace item number three with the following:
3 - The structure is assigned to Seismic Design Category E, is classified as Risk Category I or II in accordance with Table 2-2, and is greater than two stories above grade plane.

2-2.3.3

1704.6 Special Inspector of Record [Addition]

Where required by the provisions of Section 1704.5.1 or 1704.5.2, the services of a Special Inspector of Record (SIOR) shall be retained by the Contractor as a third party quality assurance agent (see Section 2-17.1 of UFC 1-200-01). The SIOR shall be a licensed professional engineer in a state acceptable to the Authority Having Jurisdiction. The SIOR shall submit qualifications acceptable to the Authority Having Jurisdiction. 2-2.3.4 1704.6.1 Duties of the Special Inspector of Record [Addition]

The duties of the SIOR shall include the following: 1. Supervise all Special Inspectors required by the contract documents and the IBC. 14

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 2. Submit a letter to the Authority Having Jurisdiction attesting to acceptance of the duties of SIOR. The letter shall be signed and sealed by the SIOR. 3. Verify the qualifications of all of the Special Inspectors. 4. Verify the qualifications of fabricators. 5. Develop the Special Inspection Project Manual, which will identify the specific special inspection requirements for that project and include the applicable directives from the Registered Design Professional and the Authority Having Jurisdiction. The Special Inspection Project Manual will form the basis for the preconstruction meeting and become part of the construction documents. The information in the Special Inspection Project Manual will be reviewed to verify that all parties have a clear understanding of the special inspection provisions and the individual duties and responsibilities of each party. 6. Organize and preside over a Special Inspection Meeting in which representatives of the Authority Having Jurisdiction, the Contractor, and the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge shall sign the log-insheet documenting their presence at the meeting. A copy of the Special Inspection Project Manual shall be made available on the job site during construction. 7. Attend preconstruction meetings. 8. Create a file (3- ring binder) for the Special Inspector's daily and biweekly reports and the SI Project Manual. This file shall be located in a conspicuous place in the project trailer/office to allow review by the Building Official and the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge. The file shall be kept up-to-date. 9. Submit a report to Authority Having Jurisdiction and the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge biweekly until all work requiring Special Inspections is complete. A report is required for each biweekly period in which Special Inspection activity occurs, and shall include the following: 9.1 9.2 A brief summary of the work performed during the reporting time frame. Changes and/or discrepancies with the mechanical or electrical component certification, drawings and specifications that were observed during the reporting period. Discrepancies which were resolved or corrected. A list of nonconforming items requiring resolution. All applicable test results.

9.3 9.4 9.5 2-2.3.5

1704.6.2 Final Inspection Report [Addition]

When the work requiring Special Inspections is completed and all nonconforming items have been resolved to the satisfaction of the Registered Design Professional in 15

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Responsible Charge, the Contractor shall notify the SIOR to submit a Final Special Inspection Report to the Authority Having Jurisdiction, the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge, and the Contractor. The Final Special Inspection Report shall attest that Special Inspection has been performed on all work requiring Special Inspection and that all nonconforming work was resolved to the satisfaction of the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge. The Final Special Inspection Report shall be signed, dated, and shall bear the seal of the SIOR. 2-2.4 2-2.4.1 Section 1705 REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION 1705.3.2 Adhesive Anchors [Addition]

Continuous special inspection is required during installation of post-installed adhesive anchors. The engineer of record shall determine the proof load to be used for field testing and shall indicate in the construction documents which anchors are considered critical for testing. 2-2.4.2 1705.11 Special Inspections for Seismic Resistance [Supplement]

Add the following before the paragraph: Special Inspections itemized in Sections 1705.11.1 through 1705.11.8 shall apply to structures assigned to Risk Category V. 2-2.4.3 1705.11.6 Mechanical and Electrical Components [Supplement]

Add the following after the paragraph: Special inspection and verification are required for Designated Seismic Systems and shall be performed as required by this section and Table 2-3. The Registered Design Professional in responsible charge shall prepare a Statement of Special Inspections in accordance with Section 1704 for the Designated Seismic Systems. The Statement of Special Inspections shall define the periodic walk-down inspections that shall be performed to ensure that the non-structural elements satisfy life safety mounting requirements. The walk-down inspections shall be performed by design professionals who are familiar with the construction and installation of mechanical, and electrical components, and their vulnerabilities to earthquakes. The selection of the design professional shall be subject to the approval of the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Designated Seismic Systems shall require a final walk-down inspection by the Registered Design Professional in responsible charge and by the Nonstructural Component Design Review Panel for Risk Category V installations (see Section 41601.2.2 of UFC 3-310-04). The final review shall be documented in a report. The final report prepared by the Registered Design Professional in Responsible Charge shall include the following: 1. Record/observations of final site visit 2. Documentation that all required inspections were performed in accordance with the Statement of Special Inspections. 16

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 3. Documentation that the Designated Seismic Systems were installed in accordance with the construction documents and the requirements of Chapter 17, as modified by this section. 2-2.4.4 1705.12 Testing and Qualification for Seismic Resistance [Supplement] Add the following before the first paragraph: Any requirements for structural testing for structures assigned to Seismic Design Category C or higher shall also apply to structures assigned to Risk Category V. TABLE 2-3 REQUIRED VERIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS*
VERIFICATION & INSPECTION 1. Equipment Verification a. Verify model number and serial number are in conformance with project specific seismic qualification (PSSQ). Verify Tag ID is correct and installed per specifications. x Continuous Periodic Standard Reference IBC Reference

b.

2. Equipment Mounting a. Verify that Anchor Base Bolting is installed per PSSQ Verify that Equipment Bracing is Installed per PSSQ Verify that Bracing Attachments are installed per PSSQ x

b.

c.

3. Utility Conduit/Piping a. Verify that Conduit/Piping is connected to the equipment per PSSQ (flex or rigid) Verify that Conduit/Piping is seismically supported independently of equipment and in accordance with PSSQ support requirements. x

b.

4. Clearance a. Adjacent Equipment Verify that there is adequate gap to x

17

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

VERIFICATION & INSPECTION eliminate possibility of pounding. b. Conduit/Piping - Verify that there is adequate gap to eliminate possibility of pounding. x Continuous Periodic Standard Reference IBC Reference

*All required inspections and verifications shall be carried out for each piece of equipment constituting part of the Designated Seismic Systems.

2-3 2-3.1 2-3.1.1

CHAPTER 18 - SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Section 1808 - FOUNDATIONS 1808.4 - Vibratory Loads [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Design foundations in accordance with ACI 351.3R, ACI 350.4R and UFC 3-220-01. 2-3.1.2 1808.8.2.1 - Reinforcement [Addition]

For footings over three feet (914 mm) thick, the minimum ratio of reinforcement area to gross concrete area in each direction shall be 0.0015, with not less than one-half nor more than two-thirds of the total reinforcement required placed near any one face. Minimum bar size shall be No. 4 (#13M) with a maximum spacing of 12 inches (305 mm). 2-3.2 2-3.2.1 Section 1809 - SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS 1809.5.1 - Frost Line Depth [Addition]

Depths to the frost line at specific locations within the United States and its territories and possessions are identified in Table E-2 of UFC 3-301-01. Frost line depths at specific locations outside of the United States are identified in Table F-2 of UFC 3-30101. At locations where frost depths are not provided, use the best locally available information. For additional guidance contact the Authority Having Jurisdiction. For guidance on the depth of footings due to frost see Section B-2.3 of UFC 3-301-01. 2-4 2-4.1 2-4.1.1 CHAPTER 19 - CONCRETE Section 1901 GENERAL 1901.5 - Construction Joints [Addition]

Provide construction, contraction, and expansion joints in structures in accordance with ACI 224.3R and ACI 318, Section 6.4. 18

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 2-4.1.2 1901.6 Tension Ties [Addition]

Where reinforcement is used as a tension tie, splices shall be made with a full mechanical or full welded splice per chapter 12 of ACI 318. 2-4.1.3 1901.7 Drying Shrinkage [Addition]

Concrete drying shrinkage shall be determined for the approved concrete mixture per ASTM C157/C157M as modified by ACI 364.3R and shall not exceed 0.05. 2-4.1.4 1901.8 Lightweight Concrete Water Content [Addition]

All coarse lightweight aggregate used in a concrete mixture shall be saturate surface dry prior to mixing. The total allowable water in the concrete mixture shall account for the water in the aggregate and admixtures. The water-to-cement ratio shall not exceed 0.50. 2-4.2 2-4.2.1 Section 1904 - DURABILITY REQUIREMENTS 1904.3 - Corrosive Environments [Addition]

In a marine environment where concrete is subjected to salt-water wave action and spray, reinforcement protection shall be in accordance with ACI 357R. 2-4.3 2-4.3.1 Section 1906 STRUCTURAL PLAIN CONCRETE 1906.1 - Scope [Deletion]

Delete the exception to this section in its entirety. 2-4.4 2-4.4.1 Section 1907 - MINIMUM SLAB PROVISIONS 1907.1 - General [Replacement]

Replace the first line of the paragraph to read: The thickness of concrete floor slabs supported directly on the ground shall not be less than 4 inches (102 mm). 2-4.4.2 1907.2 - Slab-on-Ground Design [Addition]

Slabs-on-ground shall be designed in accordance with ACI 360R, except slabs-onground supporting aircraft loading shall be designed in accordance with UFC 3-260-02. 2-4.4.2.1 1907.2.1 - Wall Loads on Slab-on-Ground [Addition]

Slabs-on-ground shall have adequate thickness to support wall line load as indicated in Tables 2-4 and 2-5. The thickened portion shall have a minimum width as shown in Figure 2-1. 2-4.4.2.2 1907.2.2 - Slab-on-Ground Over Permafrost [Addition] 19

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Design and construction of slabs-on-ground over permafrost shall be in accordance with UFC 3-130-01 and UFC 3-130-04. 2-4.4.2.3 1907.2.3 - Post-Tensioned Slab-on-Ground [Addition]

The design of post-tensioned slabs-on-ground shall be in accordance with PTI DC10.1.

20

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE 2-4 - MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR WALL LOAD NEAR CENTER OF SLAB OR NEAR KEYED OR DOWELED JOINTS

Thickness of Thickened Floor Slab, te 4 in (102 mm) 5 in (127 mm) 6 in (152 mm) 7 in (178 mm) 8 in (203 mm) 9 in (229 mm) 10 in (254 mm)

Slab Line Load Capacity, P Flexural Strength a of Concrete 550 psi (3.9 MPa) 425 lb/ft (6.2 kN/m) 565 lb/ft (8.2 kN/m) 710 lb/ft (10.4 kN/m) 860 lb/ft (12.6 kN/m) 1015 lb/ft (14.8 kN/m) 1175 lb/ft (17.1 kN/m) 1340 lb/ft (19.6 kN/m) 600 psi (4.1 MPa) 455 lb/ft (6.6 kN/m) 600 lb/ft (8.8 kN/m) 755 lb/ft (11.0 kN/m) 920 lb/ft (13.4 kN/m) 1080 lb/ft (15.8 kN/m) 1255 lb/ft (18.3 kN/m) 1430 lb/ft (20.9 kN/m) 650 psi (4.5 MPa) 485 lb/ft (7.1 kN/m) 640 lb/ft (9.3 kN/m) 805 lb/ft (11.7 kN/m) 975 lb/ft (14.2 kN/m) 1150 lb/ft (16.8 kN/m) 1330 lb/ft (19.4 kN/m) 1520 lb/ft (22.2 kN/m) 700 psi (4.8 MPa) 510 lb/ft (7.4 kN/m) 675 lb/ft (9.9 kN/m) 850 lb/ft (12.4 kN/m) 1030 lb/ft (15.0 kN/m) 1215 lb/ft 17.7 kN/m) 1410 lb/ft (20.6 kN/m) 1605 lb/ft (23.4 kN/m)

21

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE 2-5 - MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WALL LOAD AT A THICKENED SLAB FOR WALL LOAD NEAR FREE EDGE

Thickness of Thickened Floor Slab, te 4 in (102 mm) 5 in (127 mm) 6 in (152 mm) 7 in (178 mm) 8 in (203 mm) 9 in (229 mm) 10 in (254 mm)

Slab Line Load Capacity, P Flexural Strength a of Concrete 550 psi (3.9 MPa) 330 lb/ft (4.8 kN/m) 435 lb/ft (6.4 kN/m) 550 lb/ft (8.0 kN/m) 665 lb/ft (9.7 kN/m) 785 lb/ft (11.5 kN/m) 910 lb/ft (13.3 kN/m) 1040 lb/ft (15.2 kN/m) 600 psi (4.1 MPa) 355 lb/ft (5.2 kN/m) 465 lb/ft (6.8 kN/m) 585 lb/ft (8.5 kN/m) 710 lb/ft (10.4 kN/m) 840 lb/ft (12.3 kN/m) 975 lb/ft (14.2 kN/m) 1110 lb/ft (16.2 kN/m) 650 psi (4.5 MPa) 375 lb/ft (5.5 kN/m) 495 lb/ft (7.2 kN/m) 620 lb/ft (9.1 kN/m) 755 lb/ft (11.0 kN/m) 890 lb/ft (13.0 kN/m) 1035 lb/ft (15.1 kN/m) 1180 lb/ft (17.2 kN/m) 700 psi (4.8 MPa) 395 lb/ft (5.8 kN/m) 525 lb/ft (7.7 kN/m) 660 lb/ft (9.6 kN/m) 800 lb/ft (11.7 kN/m) 945 lb/ft (13.8 kN/m) 1090 lb/ft (15.9 kN/m) 1245 lb/ft (18.2 kN/m)

Notes for Table 2-4 and Table 2-5: The allowable wall loads are based on a modulus of subgrade reaction (k) of 100 pounds per cubic inch (27.1 MPa/m). The thickness of the thickened slab will be computed by multiplying the above thickness by a constant factor. Constants for other subgrade moduli are tabulated below. Modulus of Subgrade Reaction (k) Constant Factor 25 pci (6.8 MPa/m) 1.3 50 pci (13.6 MPa/m) 1.1 22 100 pci (27.1 MPa/m) 1.0 200 pci (54.3 MPa/m) 0.9 300 pci (81.4 MPa/m) 0.8

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 For other modulus of subgrade reaction values the constant values may be found from the equation 5 100 / k , ( 5 27.1/ metric).
a

For this application the flexural strength of concrete was assumed equal to 9

f 'c ,

(0.75 metric) where fc is the specified compressive strength of concrete in pounds per square inch (MPa).

23

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 FIGURE 2-1 - WIDTHS OF THICKENED SLABS AND SLAB EDGE CONDITIONS UNDER WALL LOADS

A) SLABS LOADED NEAR THE CENTER

See Figure 2-1 (A) for slab width B) SLABS LOADED NEAR A KEYED OR DOWELED JOINT

C) SLABS LOADED NEAR A FREE EDGE

24

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 2-5 2-5.1 2-5.1.1 CHAPTER 21 - MASONRY Section 2101 - GENERAL 2101.2.1 - Allowable Stress Design [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Masonry shall be designed as reinforced unless the element is isolated from the structure so that vertical and lateral forces are not imparted to the element. 2-5.1.2 2101.2.2 - Strength Design [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Masonry shall be designed as reinforced unless the element is isolated from the structure so that vertical and lateral forces are not imparted to the element. 2-5.1.3 2101.2.4 - Empirical Design [Replacement]

Masonry shall not be designed by the empirical method. 2-5.1.4 2101.4 - Coupling Beams [Addition]

Design of coupling beams shall be in accordance with paragraph 14.4.5.3 of ASCE/SEI 7. 2-5.1.5 2101.5 - Shear Wall Construction [Addition]

Shear walls shall be running bond construction only; stack bond construction is not permitted. 2-5.2 2-5.2.1 Section 2104 - CONSTRUCTION 2104.1.2 - Placing Mortar and Units [Supplement]

Add the following line to the end of the paragraph: Masonry walls below grade and elevator shaft walls shall be grouted solid. 2-5.2.2 2104.1.3 - Installation of Wall Ties [Supplement]

Add the following line to the end of the paragraph: Corrugated metal brick ties shall not be used. 2-5.2.3 2104.1.7 - Joint Reinforcement [Addition]

Horizontal wall reinforcement shall be continuous around wall corners and through wall intersections, unless the intersecting walls are separated. Reinforcement that is spliced in accordance with the applicable provisions of ACI 530 shall be considered continuous. 2-5.2.4 2104.1.8 - Concrete Masonry Control Joints [Addition] 25

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Spacing and placement of control joints shall be in accordance with NCMA TEK 10-2C or 10-3. 2-5.2.5 2104.1.9 - Vertical Brick Expansion Joints [Addition]

Spacing, placement, and size of vertical brick expansion joints shall be in accordance with BIA Technical Notes 18 and 18A. 2-5.3 Section 2109 - EMPIRICAL DESIGN OF MASONRY [Deletion]

This section shall be deleted in its entirety. 2-6 2-6.1 2-6.1.1 CHAPTER 22 - STEEL Section 2204 - CONNECTIONS 2204.2 - Bolting [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Compressible-washer-type direct tension indicators or twist-off-type tension-control bolts conforming to RCSC, Specification for Structural Joints Using High-Strength Bolts shall be provided at all bolted connections. 2-6.2 2-6.2.1 Section 2205 - STRUCTURAL STEEL 2205.1 - General [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Structural steel floor framing systems shall be designed for vibration serviceability in accordance with AISC Design Guide 11. 2-6.2.2 2205.3 - Steel Structures in Corrosive Environments [Addition]

Steel structures or elements exposed to weather, salt spray or other corrosive environments shall be protected through coatings, galvanizing or the use of stainless alloy. Select the appropriate system or material to suit the anticipated exposure. For steel deck exposed to spray from salt, salt water, or brackish water, provide ASTM A653/A653M G90 galvanizing. For cold-formed steel members exposed to spray from salt, salt water, or brackish water, provide ASTM A653/A653M G90 galvanizing and connect with corrosion-resistant fasteners. See Section B-5.4 of UFC 3-301-01 for additional guidance. 2-6.3 2-6.3.1 Section 2210 - COLD-FORMED STEEL 2210.1.1.2 Steel Roof Deck [Addition]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Steel roof deck shall not be less than 22gauge. 2-6.3.2 2210.1.1.3 - Steel Deck Diaphragms [Addition] 26

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Design of steel deck diaphragms for in-plane and out-of-plane loads shall be in accordance with the SDI DDM03. 2-6.3.3 2210.1.1.4 - Composite Steel Floor Decks [Addition]

Composite steel floor decks shall be permitted to be designed and constructed in accordance with ANSI/SDI-C. 2-6.4 Section 2211 - COLD-FORMED STEEL LIGHT-FRAMED CONSTRUCTION 2-6.4.1 2211.6.1 - Diagonal Bracing Material [Addition]

Diagonal bracing material shall be ASTM A653/A653M steel without rerolling, which induces strain hardening and reduces the elongation of the material which is not desirable for performance under seismic loading. 2-6.4.2 2211.8 - Floor Vibrations [Addition]

Cold-formed steel framing systems shall be designed for vibration serviceability in accordance with the proposed design procedure in Floor Vibration Design Criterion for Cold-Formed C-Shaped Supported Residential Floor Systems thesis by Kraus and Murray. Proposed design procedure is based on residential construction, but is applicable to all applications of cold-formed floor construction. 2-6.4.3 2211.9 - Brick Veneer/Steel Stud Walls [Addition]

Design of steel stud backup for brick veneer shall follow the recommendations from BIA Technical Note 28B. In particular the recommendations for minimum stud gage, minimum galvanization, minimum anchorage of studs to track, welding of studs, use of deflection track, allowable stud deflection, wall sheathing and water-resistant barrier shall be followed. 2-6.4.4 2211.10 - Cold-Formed Steel Connections [Addition]

Cold-formed steel members shall be interconnected with screw fasteners or by welding. The use of pneumatic nailing is permitted only for the connection of cold-formed members to other materials. 2-6.4.5 2211.11 - Galvanized Cold-Formed Framing [Addition]

Cold-formed steel members exposed to spray from salt, salt water, brackish water, or seawater shall be galvanized per ASTM A653/A653M G90 and all fasteners shall be corrosion-resistant.

27

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

This page intentionally left blank.

28

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

CHAPTER 3 MODIFICATIONS TO ASCE/SEI 7 3-1 3-1.1 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL 1.3.1.3 Performance Based Procedures [Replacement]

Structural and nonstructural components and their connections shall be demonstrated by a combination of analysis and testing to provide a reliability not less than that expected for similar components designed in accordance with the Strength Procedures of Section 1.3.1.1 when subject to the influence of dead, live, environmental, and other loads. Consideration shall be given to uncertainties in loading and resistance. 3-1.2 1.3.1.3.1 Analysis [Supplement]

Add to the end of the paragraph: During the design concept stage of development documentation shall be submitted to the Authority Having Jurisdiction for approval of the performance based design approach. 3-1.3 1.3.1.3.3 Documentation [Replacement]

The procedures used to demonstrate compliance with this section and the results of analysis and testing shall be documented in one or more reports submitted for prior approval to the Authority Having Jurisdiction and to an independent peer review. 3-2 CHAPTER 2 COMBINATIONS OF LOADS

3-2.1 2.3.5 Load Combinations Including Self-Straining Loads [Supplement] Add to the end of the paragraph: The effect of load T shall be taken into consideration on a structure, its impact on serviceability and long term performance of the facility shall be evaluated. For further information see C2.3.5. 3-2.2 2.4.4 Load Combinations Including Self-Straining Loads [Supplement] Add to the end of the paragraph: The effect of load T shall be taken into consideration on a structure, its impact on serviceability and long term performance of the facility shall be evaluated. For further information see C2.3.5. 3-2.3 2.5.1 Applicability [Replacement]

Where required by UFC 4-023-03, strength and stability shall be checked to ensure that structures are capable of resisting the effects of progressive collapse with the load combinations provided in UFC 4-023-03.

29

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 3-2.4 2.5.2 Load Combinations [Deletion]

This section shall be deleted in its entirety. 3-2.5 2.5.3 Stability Requirements [Deletion]

This section shall be deleted in its entirety. 3-3 3-3.1 CHAPTER 7 SNOW LOADS 7.4 Sloped Roof Snow Loads [Supplement]

Add to the end of the paragraph: Where obstructions occur on the roof from equipment such as photovoltaic panels, lightning cable systems, etc., the potential for snow buildup around the obstructions shall be considered. 3-4 3-4.1 CHAPTER 11 SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA 11.2 Definitions [Replacement]

Replace the definition for Moment Frame with the following: Moment Frame: A frame in which all members and joints resist lateral forces by flexure as well as along the axis of the members. Moment frames are categorized as intermediate moment frames (IMF), ordinary moment frames (OMF), and special moment frames (SMF). 3-5 CHAPTER 15 SEISMIC DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR NONBUILDING STRUCTURES 3-5.1 15.4.5 Drift Limitations [Supplement]

Add the following to the end of the paragraph: Non-building structures similar to buildings shall comply with lateral drift requirements as specified for buildings in Chapter 12, ASCE/SEI 7. Exception: The drift limits can deviate from specifications in Chapter 12, ASCE/SEI 7 with concurrence/approval from the Authority Having Jurisdiction.

30

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 CHAPTER 4 OTHER STRUCTURES 4-1 HIGHWAY BRIDGE DESIGN

Design of highway bridges shall be in accordance with AASHTO Bridge Design Specifications and AISC Highway Structures Design Handbook. 4-2 RAILROAD BRIDGE DESIGN

Design of railroad bridges shall be in accordance with the AREMA Manual for Railway Engineering. 4-3 TANKS FOR LIQUID STORAGE

Design of tanks for liquid storage shall be in accordance with NFPA 22, AWWA D100, AWWA D103, AWWA D110 and AWWA D120 as applicable. 4-4 TANKS FOR PETROLEUM STORAGE

Design of tanks for petroleum storage shall be in accordance with UFC 3-460-01. 4-5 ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING CONCRETE STRUCTURES

Design of environmental engineering concrete structures shall be in accordance with ACI 350. 4-6 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE TANKS

Design of prestressed concrete tanks shall be in accordance with ACI 372R. 4-7 WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES

Design of water treatment facilities shall be in accordance with the WEF Manual of Practice 8. 4-8 TRANSMISSION TOWERS AND POLES

Design of transmission towers shall be in accordance with ASCE 10. Design of transmission poles shall be in accordance with the National Electric Safety Code. 4-9 ANTENNA TOWERS

Design of antenna towers shall be in accordance with ANSI/TIA-222-G. 4-10 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES

Design of pedestrian bridges shall be in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Guide Specifications for Design of Pedestrian Bridges. 31

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

This page intentionally left blank.

32

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 APPENDIX A REFERENCES COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY http://www.crrel.usace.army.mil/ Database and Methodology for Conducting Site Specific Snow Load Case Studies for the United States AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS http://www.transportation.org/ LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Customary U.S. Units LRFD Guide Specifications for the Design of Pedestrian Bridges AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE http://www.concrete.org/general/home.asp ACI 223R, Guide for the Use of Shrinkage-Compensating Concrete ACI 224R, Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures ACI 224.3R, Joints in Concrete Construction ACI 302.1R, Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction ACI 302.2R, Guide for Concrete Slabs that Receive Moisture-Sensitive Flooring Materials ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete ACI 350.4R, Design Considerations for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures ACI 350, Code Requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete Structures ACI 351.3R, Foundations for Dynamic Equipment ACI 357R, Guide for the Design and Construction of Fixed Offshore Concrete Structures ACI 360R, Guide to Design of Slabs-on-Ground ACI 364.3R, Guide for Cementitious Repair Material Data Sheet

33

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 ACI 372R, Design and Construction of Circular Wire and Strand-Wrapped Prestressed Concrete Structures ACI 530, Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION http://www.aisc.org/ AISC 360, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings AISC Design Guide 1, Base Plate and Anchor Rod Design AISC Design Guide 3, Serviceability Design Considerations for Steel Buildings, Second Edition AISC Design Guide 11, Floor Vibrations Due to Human Activity Highway Structures Design Handbook, Second Edition RCSC Specification for Structural Joints Using High-Strength Bolts Shear Transfer in Exposed Column Base Plates, Ivan Gomez, Amit Kanvinde, Chris Smith and Gregory Deierlein AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE http://www.steel.org/ Effective Lengths for Laterally Unbraced Compression Flanges of Continuous Beams Near Intermediate Supports, J. H. Garrett, Jr., G. Haaijer, and K. H. Klippstein, Proceedings, Sixth Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures (http://www.ccfssonline.org/) AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE http://www.ansi.org/ ANSI/ASSE Z359, Fall Protection Code/Standards ANSI/ASSE A1264.1, Safety Requirements for Workplace Walking/Working Surfaces and Their Access; Workplace Floor, Wall and Roof Openings, Stairs and Guardrails Systems AMERICAN RAILWAY ENGINEERING AND MAINTENANCE-OF-WAY ASSOCIATION http://www.arema.org/ Manual for Railway Engineering

34

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS http://www.asce.org/asce.cfm ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures ASCE 10, Design of Latticed Steel Transmission Structures SEI/ASCE 32, Design and Construction of Frost-Protected Shallow Foundations ASCE 41, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION http://www.awwa.org/ AWWA D100, Welded Carbon Steel Tanks for Water Storage AWWA D103, Factory-Coated Bolted Steel Tanks for Water Storage AWWA D110, Wire- and Strand-Wound, Circular, Prestressed Concrete Water Tanks AWWA D120, Thermosetting Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic Tanks ASM WORLD HEADQUARTERS http://www.asminternational.org/ ASM Handbook Volume 13B Corrosion: Materials ASTM INTERNATIONAL http://www.astm.org/ ASTM A653/A653M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process ASTM C157/C157M, Standard Test Method for Length Change of Hardened HydraulicCement Mortar and Concrete BRICK INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION http://www.gobrick.com/ BIA Technical Note 18, Volume Changes Analysis and Effects of Movement BIA Technical Note 18A, Accommodating Expansion of Brickwork BIA Technical Note 28B, Brick Veneer/Steel Stud Walls FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY http://www.fema.gov/ FEMA P-361, Design and Construction Guidance for Community Safe Rooms 35

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL http://www.iccsafe.org/ International Building Code MCGRAW-HILL http://www.mhprofessional.com/ Metal Building System Design and Specification, Alexander Newman METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION http://www.mbma.com/ Metal Building Systems Manual, including 2010 Supplement NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES HTTP://WWW.NATIONALACADEMIES.ORG/ Technical Report No. 65, Expansion Joints in Buildings NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION http://www.ncma.org/Pages/default.aspx TEK 10-2C, Control Joints for Concrete Masonry Walls Empirical Method TEK 10-3, Control Joints for Concrete Masonry Walls Alternative Engineered Method NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION http://www.nfpa.org/ NFPA 22, Standard for Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION HTTP://WWW.OSHA.GOV/ 29 CFR, Part 1926, Safety and Health Regulations for Construction 29 CFR, Part 1910, Occupational Safety and Health Standards for General Industry 29 CFR, Part 1910, Notices of Proposed Rulemaking POST-TENSIONING INSTITUTE http://www.post-tensioning.org/ PTI DC10.1, Design of Post-Tensioned Slabs-on-Ground

36

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 STEEL DECK INSTITUTE http://www.sdi.org/ SDI DDM03, Diaphragm Design Manual Third Edition ANSI/SDI-C, Composite Steel Floor Deck Slab STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA http://www.seaoc.org/ SEAOC PV1-2012, Structural Seismic Requirements and Commentary for Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Arrays SEAOC PV2-2012, Wind Design for Low-Profile Solar Photovoltaic Arrays on Flat Roofs TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION http://www.tiaonline.org/ ANSI/TIA-222-G, Structural Standards for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA
http://dod.wbdg.org/

UFC 1-200-01, General Building Requirements UFC 3-110-03, Roofing UFC 3-130-01, General Provisions - Arctic and Subarctic Construction UFC 3-130-04, Foundations for Structures - Arctic and Subarctic Construction UFC 3-130-06, Calculations Methods for Determination of Depths of Freeze and Thaw in Soil Arctic and Subarctic Construction UFC 3-220-01, Geotechnical Engineering UFC 3-260-02, Pavement Design for Airfields UFC 3-310-04, Seismic Design for Buildings UFC 3-320-06A, Concrete Floor Slabs on Grade Subjected to Heavy Loads UFC 3-460-01, Design: Petroleum Fuel Facilities UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings UFC 4-023-03, Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse

37

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY USGS National Center, Earthquake Hazards Program, http://geohazards.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/ U.S. Seismic Design Maps Web Application, Version 3.0.1, for the 2012 version of the International Building Code VIRGINIA TECH http://www.vt.edu/ Kraus and Murray, Floor Vibration Design Criterion for Cold-Formed C-Shaped Supported Residential Floor systems, Masters Thesis WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION http://www.wef.org/ WEF MOP8, Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants

38

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 APPENDIX B BEST PRACTICES B-1 B-1.1 STRUCTURAL DESIGN Building Drift Limits

The IBC and ASCE/SEI 7 provide guidance and discussion on establishing drift limits and load combinations that must be considered in evaluating serviceability. The establishment of acceptable drift limits requires significant engineering judgment. Application of a requirement that is too stringent can significantly impact the cost of a structure. Requirements that are too lax can lead to damage of rigidly connected components. The Metal Building Systems Manual provides guidance for allowable drift due to wind loads for pre-engineered metal buildings, and serviceability recommendations for metal buildings can also be found in Chapter L of AISC 360 with additional guidance in AISC Steel Design Guide 3. When separate support columns are used for top-running cranes, they should be supported so that differential movement between the crane columns and building columns, due to differences in stiffness, does not overstress either column and result in local column buckling. B-1.2 Impact Resistant Glazing

Buildings which are subjected to tornado winds can suffer some of the same missile impact damage to the exterior faade of the building as those located in windborne debris regions. The loss of glazing on a building due to missile impact can render the facility inoperable. The loss of glazing will also cause an increase in internal pressure in the building causing further damage. Consideration should be given to providing impact resistant glazing on facilities in tornado prone areas similar to what is required in windborne debris regions. Tornado prone regions are the areas of the United States that have had five or more a recorded EF3, EF4 or EF5 tornadoes per Figure 2-2 in FEMA P-361. B-1.3 Hard Wall Buildings

In buildings constructed of load bearing tilt-up or precast structural walls the loss of the roof diaphragm during a high wind event can lead to total collapse of the structure. The following are several possible methods to mitigate this hazard: Create enough fixity between the bottom of the panels and the foundation to provide stability to the wall panels in the event of the loss of the roof diaphragm. Limit the length of continuous wall panels between full height lateral cross bracing elements to better restrain the wall panels. Provide a system of robust continuous ties across the roof diaphragm to preserve the walls if the roof diaphragm fails.

39

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 B-1.4 Wind and Seismic Loads on Photovoltaic Arrays

Guidance on the design wind and seismic loads for roof top photovoltaic arrays can be found in Wind Design for Low-Profile Solar Photovoltaic Arrays on Flat Roofs (SEAOC PV2-2012) and Structural Seismic Requirements and Commentary for Rooftop Solar Photovoltaic Arrays (SEAOC PV1-2012), prepared by the Structural Engineers Association of California Solar Photovoltaic Systems Committee. When designing support structures for photovoltaic arrays, review requirements in UFC 3-110-03 Roofing concerning roof mounted systems including the requirement that supports be permanently affixed to the structure, which means that ballasted systems are not permitted. B-1.5 Wind Loads on Buildings with Large Openings

When determining wind loads on building containing large openings such as overhead doors in warehouses, maintenance shops, etc., it is recommended that the criteria for hangars in Section 2-1.5.2 of this UFC be used. B-2 B-2.1 SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS Gable Bent Footings

Moment frame reactions from metal building gable bents have horizontal thrusts at column bases which can be resisted by several methods. For large thrust forces (40 to 50 kips (118 kN to 222 kN)), tie rods are usually cost-effective. The tie rod can be embedded in a thickened slab or as part of a tie beam between column foundations. For smaller thrust forces, hairpin rebar may be used to transfer the thrust force from the column anchor bolts into the slab-on-ground reinforcement which acts as the tie between the columns. However, each of these methods requires close attention to detailing of control joints in the slab, isolation joints around a foundation pier and other possible interruptions in the continuous slab reinforcement between columns. Also, future renovation that might require trenching across the continuous slab reinforcement could result in the loss of the tension tie. A third method is to design the foundation for an overturning moment due to the thrust force at the base of the column. Each of these methods can provide the necessary resistance to the thrust force, but needs to be evaluated for each project condition. For further discussion on the design of foundations for gable bent reactions, refer to Metal Building System Design and Specification by Alexander Newman. B-2.2 Footings on Expansive Soils

In the presence of expansive soils, footings must be designed to withstand expansive soil movement in order to prevent significant damage to structures. Cyclical expansive soil movement from soil water content, usually caused by a combination of inadequate drainage and seasonal wetting and drying cycles, are especially troublesome. Base the design on soil testing and recommendations by qualified geotechnical engineers. Ensure soil investigations include estimates of settlement, heave, and recommendations to mitigate effects of expansive soil movement. Ensure positive 40

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 drainage away from structures that will prevent ponding close to structures. Guidance on design of foundations on expansive soils can be found in UFC 3-220-01. B-2.3 Footings Depth Due to Frost

The depth to which frost penetrates at a site depends on the climate, the type of soil, the moisture in the soil and the surface cover (e.g., pavement kept clear of snow vs. snow covered turf). If the supporting soil is warmed by heat from a building, frost penetration is reduced considerably. The values in Tables E-2 and F-2 represent the depth of frost penetration to be expected if the ground is bare of vegetation and snow cover, the soil is non-frost susceptible (NFS), well-drained (i.e., dry) sand or gravel, and no building heat is available. Thus, these values represent the deepest (i.e., worst case) frost penetration expected in each area. Most building foundations can be at a shallower depth without suffering frost action. (However, other considerations besides frost penetration may affect foundation depth, such as erosion potential or moisture desiccation). For interior footings, which under service conditions are not normally susceptible to frost, the potential effects of frost heave during construction should be considered. Design values for heated and unheated buildings may be obtained by reducing the values in Tables E-2 and F-2 according to Figure B-1. For buildings heated only infrequently, the curve in Figure B-1 for unheated buildings should be used. The curves in Figure B-1 were established with an appreciation for the variability of soil and the understanding that some portions of the building may abut snow-covered turf while other portions abut paved areas kept clear of snow. Foundations should be placed at or below the depths calculated above. The foundation of heated buildings may be placed at a shallower depth than calculated above if protected from frost action by insulation on the cold side, see Figure C1 of SEI/ASCE 32. For more information on the design of foundation insulation, see SEI/ASCE 32. Additional information on which more refined estimates of frost penetration can be made, based on site-specific climatic information, the type of ground cover and soil conditions is contained in UFC 3-130-06. Figure B-1 Footing Depth Example: The minimum depth needed for footings of a hospital and an unheated vehicle storage building to be built in Fort Drum, New York, is calculated to protect them from frost action. The tabulated frost penetration value for Fort Drum is 94 inches (Table E-2). Using the heated curve in Figure B-1, footings for the hospital should be located 4 feet below the surface. Using the unheated curve, footings for the unheated garage should be located 5.5 feet below the surface.

41

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 FIGURE B-1 DESIGN DEPTH OF BOTTOM OF BUILDING FOUNDATION

42

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 B-3 B-3.1 CONCRETE Slab-on-Ground Concrete Strength

For slabs-on-ground subject to forklift traffic, it is recommended that the minimum compressive strength for the concrete be 4,000 psi (27.6 MPa) for pneumatic tire traffic and 5,000 psi (34.5 MPa) for steel tire traffic. B-3.2 Slab-on-Ground Control Joints

For slabs-on-ground it is recommended that the control joints align across the building floor plate to avoid joints ending abruptly along the length or width of a panel. Joints that end abruptly at an adjacent panel edge could cause a crack to propagate into the adjacent panel. For locations where placement of joints at a panel edge are unavoidable, refer to UFC 3-320-06A for additional reinforcement requirements to minimize crack propagation. Location of control joints in slabs-on-ground need to be coordinated with the joints in hard-surface finishes to avoid having the control joint telegraph through the hardsurface finish. B-3.3 Slab-on-Ground Drying Shrinkage

Cracking in slabs generally results from drying shrinkage and restraint caused by friction between the slab and subgrade. Curling and warping occur due to differential shrinkage when the top of the slab dries to lower moisture content than the bottom of the slab. Recommendations for reducing the effects of drying shrinkage can be found in ACI 360R, ACI 224R and ACI 302.1R. Shrinkage compensating concrete can also be used to reduce shrinkage cracking. See recommendations in ACI 223R. B-3.4 Slab-on-Ground Vapor Retarder/Barrier

To facilitate proper moisture control of a slab-on-ground to meet the moisture limits of water-based adhesives and durability during construction, it is recommended that the vapor retarder have a minimum thickness of 10 mil (250 m) with a maximum permeance rating of 0.04 perm. Where moisture is a critical issue under the floor covering, such as wood floors, and a vapor barrier required, it is recommended to reduce the maximum permeance rating to 0.01 perm. For further guidance on slabs to receive moisture-sensitive floor coverings refer to ACI 302.2R. B-3.5 Post Installed Adhesive Concrete Anchors

It is recommended that adhesive anchors be proof loaded during special inspections of critical anchors to the lesser of 50 percent of the expected peak load based on adhesive bond strength or 80 percent of the anchor yield strength with the proof load being sustained for a minimum of 10 seconds.

43

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 B-4 B-4.1 MASONRY Masonry Veneer Base Detail

The base of the masonry veneer should be placed on a shelf angle or a foundation ledge that is lower than the base of the steel stud wall by at least 4 inches (102 mm). The width of this shelf angle or foundation ledge will include the width of the masonry veneer and the cavity. This width should not be less than two-thirds of the veneer thickness plus the minimum air space. B-5 B-5.1 STEEL Shelf Angles for Masonry

Shelf angles should be hot-dip galvanized structural steel members. Angles should be provided in segments approximately 10 feet (3 m) in length, with gaps between segments. Shelf angles should be detailed to allow enough gaps for thermal expansion and contraction of the steel in angle runs and at building corners. Corners of buildings should have corner pieces with each leg no less than 4 feet (1.2 m) in length where possible. Limit deflection of horizontal legs of shelf angles under masonry loading to 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) at the end of the horizontal leg. Rotation of the shelf angle support should be included in the 1/16 inch (1.6 mm) deflection limit for the horizontal leg displacement calculation. B-5.2 Cold-Formed Continuous Beams and Joists

Guidance on determining the effective length of the unbraced compression flange for cold-formed continuous beams and joists can be found in AISI Effective Lengths for Laterally Unbraced Compression Flanges of Continuous Beams Near Intermediate Supports. B-5.3 Masonry Veneer/Steel Stud Wall Detailing

Recommended details for masonry veneer/steel stud wall assemblies can be found in BIA Technical Note 28B. B-5.4 Steel Structures in Corrosive Environments

Steel structures designed for corrosive environments should include consideration of the following corrosion protection measures: a. Box-shaped members should be designed so that all inside surfaces may be readily inspected, cleaned, and painted, or should be closed entirely, except when hot-dip galvanized, to prevent exposure to moisture. 44

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 b. The legs of two back-to-back angle members, when not in contact, should have a minimum separation of 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) to permit air circulation. c. Pockets or depressions in horizontal members should have drain holes to prevent water from ponding in low areas. Positive drainage should be provided away from exposed steel. Column bases should be terminated on concrete curbs or piers above grade, and tops of curbs or piers should be pitched to drain. d. Where extremely corrosive conditions exist, consideration should be given to providing cathodic protection in addition to protective coatings for steel members exposed to salt water moisture environments. e. Structural members embedded in concrete and exterior railing, handrails, fences, guardrails, and anchor bolts should be galvanized or constructed of stainless steel. f. Dissimilar metals, (e.g., aluminum and steel, stainless steel and carbon steel, zinc coated steel and uncoated steel) should be isolated by appropriate means to avoid the creation of galvanic cells which can occur when dissimilar metals come in contact. g. Consult a corrosion specialist certified by NACE International to recommend material protection for elements exposed to heavy industrial pollution, chemicals or corrosive soils. h. For increased serviceability and compatibility with fireproofing use galvanized steel deck in accordance with ASTM A653/A653M. i. Note that some common grades of stainless alloy such as ASTM Type 306 or 316 are susceptible to corrosion when immersed in salt or brackish water.

Further guidance in designing steel structures in corrosive environments can be found in ASM Handbook Volume 13B. B-5.5 Steel Structures in Arctic and Antarctic Zones

For carbon steel, the transition from ductile to brittle behavior occurs within temperatures to be expected in Arctic and Antarctic zones. Ductility is important for structures in high seismic areas. Toughness, a characteristic also affected by cold temperatures, is important for structures which could be subjected to cyclic or impact loadings. Design of structures which could be subjected to cyclic or impact loads in cold climates should include consideration of the following measures to mitigate potential fatigue and fracture problems: a. Provide ample fillets to avoid stress risers. 45

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 b. Use bolted joints whenever possible. If welded joints are used, take precautions to eliminate gas and impurities in welds. Proper preheating and post-cooling are essential. c. Use low-carbon steels and nickel-alloy steel that have good toughness characteristics at low temperatures. B-5.6 Steel Column Base Plate Shear Transfer

Shear transfer between column base plates and the concrete foundation elements can be accomplished through several load paths including shear friction between the base plate and grout, anchor rod bearing or shear key bearing. The design provisions in AISC Design Guide 1: Base Plate and Anchor Rod Design should be followed when designing base plates for shear. Research and full scale testing of base plates in shear, conducted at University of California at Berkely, provide further guidance on recommended shear friction coefficient, anchor rod bending length and concrete capacity design of shear key bearing. Results of the testing can be found in the research report Shear Transfer in Exposed Column Base Plates. B-5.7 Steel Joist Connections

Connections between open web steel joists and supporting girders or joist girders and building columns are in many instances covered by typical details provided by the joist supplier which may not provide the needed capacity for lateral or uplift loading. Each joist connection should be designed specifically for the project and take into consideration the lateral and uplift loads acting on the connection. B-6 B-6.1 WOOD Connections

When using prescriptive guidelines in building codes for nailed wood connections, careful consideration needs to be given to ensure a complete load path from the roof to the foundation. The use of metal plate connections for roof trusses, top plates and sill plates is an effective way to provide a more robust load path.

46

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 APPENDIX C ABBREVIATIONS AASHTO ..... American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ACI .............. American Concrete Institute AHJ ............. Authority Having Jurisdiction AISC............ American Institute of Steel Construction ANSI............ American National Standards Institute AOB ............ Air Operations Building AREMA ....... American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association ASCE .......... American Society of Civil Engineers ASM ............ American Society for Metals ASTM .......... American Society of Testing and Materials ATCT........... Air Traffic Control Tower AWWA ........ American Water Works Association BIA .............. Brick Industry Association CRREL ........ Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory CS ............... Case Study DoD ............. Department of Defense %g ............... Percent Gravity FEMA .......... Federal Emergency Management Agency IBC .............. International Building Code ICC-ES ........ International Code Council Evaluation Services IMF .............. Intermediate Moment Frame in ................. Inches 47

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 kg ................ Kilogram kg/m3 .......... Kilograms per Cubic Meter km/h ............ Kilometers per Hour kN................ Kilonewton kN/m ........... Kilonewton per Meter kN/m2 .......... Kilonewton per Square Meter kPa .............. Kilopascal lbs ............... Pounds lb/ft.............. Pounds per Foot lb/ft2 ............ Pounds per Square Foot lb/in2 ........... Pounds per Square Inch m ................. Meter m2................ Square Meter m/s .............. Meters per Second mil ............... 0.001 Inches mm .............. Millimeter mm2 ............ Square Millimeter MCER .......... Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake MPa ............. Megapascal MPa/m......... Megapascal per Meter mph............. Miles per Hour MRI.............. Mean Recurrence Interval NACE .......... National Association of Corrosion Engineers NCMA ......... National Concrete Masonry Association 48

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

NFPA .......... National Fire Protection Association NFS ............. Non-Frost Susceptible OMF ............ Ordinary Moment Frame pci ............... Pounds per Cubic Inch PGA ............ Maximum Considered Earthquake Geometric Mean (MCEG) Peak Ground Acceleration as defined in ASCE 7-10 psf ............... Pounds per Square Foot psi ............... Pounds per Square Inch PSSQ .......... Project Specific Seismic Qualification RACF .......... Radar Approach Control Facility RCSC .......... Research Council on Structural Connections SS ................ Risk-Targeted Maximum Consider Earthquake (MCER) Ground Motion of 0.2-Second Spectral Response Acceleration as determined by IBC Section 1613.3.1

S1 ................ Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) Ground Motion of 1.0-Second Spectral Response Acceleration as determined by IBC Section 1613.3.1 SS,5/50 ........... Short-period (0.2-second) spectral response acceleration with a 5% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. For reduced BSE-2E hazard for existing buildings to be used with target performance objectives as defined in ASCE 41-13. In accordance with ASCE 41-13, the short period BSE-2E spectral response acceleration need not be greater than Ss modified for site class (BSE-2N). S1,5/50 ........... Long-period (1.0-second) spectral response acceleration with a 5% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. For reduced BSE-2E hazard for existing buildings to be used with target performance objectives as defined in ASCE 41-13. In accordance with ASCE 41-13, the 1.0-second BSE-2E spectral response acceleration need not be greater than S1 modified for site class (BSE-2N). SS,10/50 ......... Short-period (0.2-second) spectral response acceleration with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years 49

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

S1,10/50 .......... Long-period (1.0-second) spectral response acceleration with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years SS,20/50 ......... Short-period (0.2-second) spectral response acceleration with a 20% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. Reduced BSE-1E hazard for existing buildings to be used with target performance objectives as defined in ASCE 41-13. In accordance with ASCE 41-13, the short period BSE-1E spectral response acceleration need not be greater than 2/3 of SS modified for site class (BSE-1N). S1,20/50 Long-period (1.0-second) spectral response acceleration with a 20% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. Reduced BSE-1E hazard for existing buildings to be used with target performance objectives as defined in ASCE 41-13. In accordance with ASCE 41-13, the 1.0-second BSE-1E spectral response acceleration need not be greater than 2/3 of S1 modified for site class (BSE-1N).

SEAOC ....... Structural Engineers Association of California SIOR ........... Special Inspector of Record SMF............. Special Moment Frame SWR ............ Special Wind Region UFC ............. Unified Facility Criteria m ............... micrometer (micron) VASD ............. Nominal Design Wind Speed VFM .............. Fastest Mile Wind Speed VULT ............. Ultimate Design Wind Speed WEF ............ Water Environment Federation

50

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 APPENDIX D MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS, LO, AND MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS D-1 REFERENCES.

All section references are to the International Building Code (IBC) 2012. Table D-1 includes IBC 2012 Table 1607.1 with additional Occupancy or Use classification for military facilities that are shown in bold italics. TABLE D-1 MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS AND MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADSg OCCUPANCY OR USE
1. Apartments (see residential) 2. Access floor systems Office use Computer use 3. Ammunition Storage High explosives (one story) Inert explosives (one story) Pyrotechnics (one story) Small arms (one story) Torpedo (one story) 4. Armories and drill rooms 5. Assembly areas Fixed seats (fastened to floor) Follow spot, projection and control rooms Lobbies Movable seats Stage floors Platforms (assembly) Other assembly areas h 6. Balconies and decks (Balconies serving as primary means of egress for multiple rooms shall be considered as corridors.) Battery charging room Boiler houses Catwalks Cleaning gear / trash room compactor Cold Storage (Food or provision freezer) First floor Upper floors Command Duty Officer Day room Cornices

UNIFORM (kPa) (psf)

--2.4 4.8 23.9 23.9 23.9 23.9 16.8 m 7.2 2.9
m

CONCENTRATED (kN) (lbs.)

--8.9 8.9 ------------------------------2,000 2,000 -------------------------------

--50 100 500 500 500 500 350 m 150 60

m

2.4 m 4.8 m 4.8 m 7.2 m 4.8 m 4.8 4.8

50 m 100 m 100 m 150 m 100 m 100 100

7. 8. 9. 10. 11.

9.6 9.6 1.9 3.6

200 200 40 75

----1.33 ---

----300 ---

19.2 14.4 2.9 2.9

400 300 60 60

---------

---------

12. 13.

51

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 OCCUPANCY OR USE

14. Corridors First floor Other floors

UNIFORM (kPa) (psf)

4.8 Same as occupancy served except as indicated 3.8 m 4.8 100 Same as occupancy served except as indicated 80 m 100

CONCENTRATED (kN) (lbs.)

-----

15. Court rooms 16. Dining rooms and restaurants 17. Decks (See Item 6.) 18. Dwellings (see residential) 19. Elevator machine room grating 2 2 (on area of 2600 mm (4 in. )) 20. Finish light floor plate construction 2 2 (on area of 650 mm (1 in. )) 21. Fire escapes On single-family dwellings only 22. Galleys Dishwashing rooms General kitchen area Provision storage (not refrigerated) Preparation room Meat Vegetable 23. Garages (passenger vehicles only) Trucks & buses 24. Generator rooms 25. Guard House 26. Handrails, guards and grab bars 27. Helipads
n

-----

-----

-----

-----

--1.33

--300

--4.8 1.9 14.4 12.0 9.6 12.0 4.8 m 1.9 See Section 1607.7 - IBC 9.6 3.6 See Section 1607.8 - IBC See Section 1607.6 - IBC 3.8 2.9 1.9 --7.2 6.0 3.6

--100 40 300 250

0.89 ---

200 ---

--200 250 100 m 40 See Section 1607.7 - IBC 200 75 See Section 1607.8 - IBC See Section 1607.6 - IBC 80 60 40 --150 125 75

---

Note a See Section 1607.7 - IBC ----See Section 1607.8 - IBC See Section 1607.6 - IBC 4.45 4.45 4.45 ---------

Note a See Section 1607.7 - IBC ----See Section 1607.8 - IBC See Section 1607.6 - IBC 1,000 1,000 1,000 ---------

28. Hospitals Corridors above first floor Operating rooms, laboratories Patient rooms 29. Hotels (see residential) 30. Incinerators; charging room 31. Laboratories, normal scientific equipment 32. Latrines / Heads / Toilets / Washroom 33. Libraries Reading rooms Stack rooms Corridors above first floor 34. Manufacturing Light Heavy

2.9 b,m 7.2 3.8 6.0 m 12.0

m

60 b,m 150 80 125 m 250

m

4.45 4.45 4.45 8.9 13.34

1,000 1,000 1,000 2,000 3,000

52

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 OCCUPANCY OR USE

35. Marquees 36. Mechanical equipment room p (general) 37. Mechanical room (HVAC) 38. Mechanical telephone and radio equipment room 39. Morgue 40. Office buildings File and computer rooms shall be designed for heavier loads based on anticipated occupancy Lobbies and first floor corridors Offices Corridors above first floor 41. Penal Institutions Cell blocks Corridors 42. Post offices General area Work rooms 43. Power plants 44. Projection booths 45. Pump houses 46. Recreation room 47. Recreational uses: Bowling alleys, poolrooms and similar uses Dance halls and ballrooms Gymnasiums Reviewing stands, grandstands and bleachers Stadiums and arenas with fixed seats (fastened to floor) 48. Receiving rooms (radio) including roof areas supporting antennas and electronic equipment 49. Refrigeration storage rooms Dairy Meat Vegetable

UNIFORM (kPa) (psf)

3.6 4.8 6.0 7.2 4.8 75 100 125 150 100

CONCENTRATED (kN) (lbs.)

---------------------

--4.8 2.4 3.8 1.9 4.8 4.8 6.0 9.6 4.8 4.8 4.8
m

--100 50 80 40 100 100 125 200 100 100 100

m

--8.9 8.9 8.9 ---

--2,000 2,000 2,000 ---

-----------

-----------

3.6 m 4.8 m 4.8 4.8

c,m

75 m 100 m 100 100 60

c,m

---

---

2.9

c,m

c,m

7.2

150

---

---

9.6 12.0 13.2

200 250 275

-------

-------

53

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 OCCUPANCY OR USE

50. Residential One & two family dwellings Uninhabitable attics i without storage Uninhabitable attics with i,j,k storage Habitable attics and sleeping areas k All other areas Hotels and multifamily dwellings Private rooms & corridors serving them Corridors serving as primary means of egress to multiple private rooms m Public rooms and corridors serving them 51. Roofs All roof surfaces subject to maintenance workers Awnings and canopies: Fabric construction supported by a skeleton structure All other construction Ordinary flat, pitched, and curved roofs (that are not occupiable) Where primary roof members are exposed to a work floor at single panel point of lower chord of roof trusses or any point along primary structural members supporting roofs: Over manufacturing, storage warehouses, and repair garages All other occupancies Occupiable roofs: Roof gardens Assembly areas All other similar areas Roof of PV shade structures 52. Schools Classrooms Corridors above first floor First floor corridors 53. Scuttles, skylight ribs, and accessible ceilings

UNIFORM (kPa) (psf)

CONCENTRATED (kN) (lbs.)

0.5 1.0 1.4 1.9

10 20 30 40

---------

---------

1.9

40 -----

3.8 4.8 ---

80 100 ---

----1.33

----300

0.23 Nonreducible 1.0 1.0

5 Nonreducible 20 20

---

---

-----

-----

----4.8 m 4.8 Note l 1.0 1.9 3.8 4.8 ---

----100 m 100 Note l 20 40 80 100 ---

8.9 1.33 ----Note l

2000 300 ----Note l

4.45 4.45 4.45 0.89

1,000 1,000 1,000 200

54

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 OCCUPANCY OR USE

54. Shops: Manufacturing and Industrial Aircraft utility Assembly and repair Bombsight (w/o shielding) Carpenter Electrical Engine overhaul 55. Sidewalks, vehicular driveways and yards, subject to trucking 56. Stairs and exits One- and two-family dwellings All other 57. Storage warehouses (shall be designed for heavier loads if required for anticipated storage) General Light Heavy Aircraft Building Materials Drugs, paint, oil Dry Provisions Groceries, wine, Liquor Light Tools Pipe & metal Paint and oil (one story) Hardware Stores Retail First floor Upper floors Wholesale, all floors Tailor shop Telephone exchange rooms and central computer IT server spaces Vehicle barriers

UNIFORM (kPa) (psf)

9.6 12.0 6.0 6.0 14.4 14.4 d,m 12.0 200 250 125 125 300 300 d,m 250

CONCENTRATED (kN) (lbs.)

------------e 35.6
f

------------e 8,000
f

1.9 4.8

40 100

1.3 f 1.3

300 f 300

6.0 m 11.97 9.58 11.97 9.58 14.36 14.36 7.2 47.88 23.94 14.36

125 m 250 200 250 200 300 300 150 1000 500 300

---

---

58.

59. 60.

4.8 3.6 m 6.0 3.6 7.2 See Section 1607.8.3 - IBC

100 75 m 125 75 150 See Section 1607.8.3 - IBC

4.45 4.45 4.45 --8.9 See Section 1607.8.3 IBC ---

1,000 1,000 1,000 --2000 See Section 1607.8.3 - IBC

61.

62. Walkways and elevated platforms (other than exit ways) Range Towers, Climbing Towers and other Multi-story Training Towers Pedestrian Bridges 63. Yards and terraces, pedestrian

2.9 4.8
o

60 100
o

---

AASHTO m 4.8

AASHTO m 100

---

---

55

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Notes to Table D-1, MINIMUM UNIFORMLY DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOADS, LO, AND MINIMUM CONCENTRATED LIVE LOADS For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 square inch = 645.16 mm2, 1 square foot = 0.0929 m2, 1 pound per square foot = 0.0479 kN/m2 = 0.0479 kPa, 1 pound = 0.004448 kN, 1 pound per cubic foot = 16 kg/m3. a. Floors in garages or portions of building used for the storage of motor vehicles shall be designed for the uniformly distributed live loads of Table 1607.1 or the following concentrated loads: (1) for garages restricted to passenger vehicles accommodating not more than nine passengers, 3,000 pounds (13.34 kN) acting on an area of 4.5 inches x 4.5 inches (114 mm x 114 mm); (2) for mechanical parking structures without slab or deck which are used for storing passenger vehicles only, 2,250 pounds (10.0 kN) per wheel. b. The loading applies to stack room floors that support non-mobile, double-faced library book stacks, subject to the following limitations: 1) The nominal book stack unit height shall not exceed 90 inches (2,290mm). 2) The nominal shelf depth shall not exceed 12 inches (305mm) for each face; and 3) Parallel rows of double-faced book stacks shall be separated by aisles not less than 36 inches (915 mm) wide. c. Design in accordance with the ICC 300. d. Other uniform loads in accordance with an approved method containing provisions for truck loadings shall also be considered where appropriate. e. The concentrated wheel load shall be applied on an area of 4.5 inches by 4.5 inches (114mm x 114mm). f. The minimum concentrated load on stair treads shall be applied on area of 2 inches by 2 inches (51mm x 51mm). This load need not be assumed to act concurrently with the uniform load. g. Where snow loads occur that are in excess of the design conditions, the structure shall be designed to support the loads due to the increased loads caused by drift buildup or a greater snow design determined by the building official. (See IBC Section 1608). h. See IBC Section 1604.8.3 for decks attached to exterior walls. i. Uninhabitable attics without storage are those where the maximum clear height between the joist and rafter is less than 42 inches (1067 mm), or where there are not two or more adjacent trusses with the same web configuration capable of accommodating an assumed rectangle 42 inches (1067 mm) high by 24 inches (610 mm) in width, or greater, within the plane of the truss. This live load need not be assumed to act concurrently with any other live load requirements. Uninhabitable attics with storage are those where the maximum clear height between the joist and rafter is 42 inches (1067 mm) or greater, or where there are two or more adjacent trusses with the same web configuration capable of 56

j.

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 accommodating an assumed rectangle 42 inches (1067 mm) high by 24 inches (610 mm) in width, or greater, within the plane of the trusses. The live load need only be applied to those portions of the joists or truss bottom chords where both of the following conditions are met: 1) The attic area is accessible from an opening not less than 20 inches (508 mm) in width by 30 inches (762 mm) in length that is located where the clear height in the attic is a minimum of 30 inches (762 mm); and 2) The slopes of the joists or truss bottom chords are no greater than two units vertical in 12 units horizontal. The remaining portions of the joist or truss bottom chords shall be designed for a uniformly distributed concurrent live load of not less than 10 psf (0.5 kPa). k. Attic spaces served by stairways other than the pull-down type shall be designed to support the minimum live load specified for habitable attics and sleeping rooms. l. Areas of occupiable roofs, other than roof gardens and assembly areas, shall be designed for appropriate loads as approved by the contracting officer, or the contracting officers designated representative. Unoccupied landscaped areas of roof shall be designed in accordance with IBC Section 1607.12.3.

m. Live load reduction is not permitted unless specific exceptions of IBC Section 1607.10 apply. n. Helipads supporting military aircraft shall be designed to support the actual aircraft weight and impact loading due to landing. o. For live loads on pedestrian bridges see AASHTO LRFD Guide Specifications for the Design of Pedestrian Bridges. p. All attics with mechanical units shall be designed for a mechanical equipment room loading.

57

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

This page intentionally left blank.

58

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 APPENDIX E SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS E-1 WIND LOADING DATA TABLE.

Site-specific structural wind loading data for DoD locations within the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table E-1. E-2 SNOW LOADING AND FROST PENETRATION DATA TABLE.

Site-specific structural snow loading and frost penetration data for DoD locations within the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table E-2. E-3 EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA TABLE.

Site-specific earthquake loading data for DoD locations within the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table E-3. TABLE E-1 - WIND LOADING DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS Table E-1
State Alabama Base / City Anniston Army Depot Birmingham Fort McClellan Fort Rucker Maxwell-Gunther AFB / Montgomery Mobile Redstone Arsenal / Huntsville Alaska Clear AS Eielson AFB Elmendorf AFB Fort Greely Fort Richardson Fort Wainwright Galena AFB Juneau I 105 105 105 112 105 142 105 105 105 120 105 121 105 114 121
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 115 115 115 120 115 155 115 110 110 132 110 133 110 122 133

III-IV 120 120 120 128 120 165 120 115 115 130 115 132 115 129 138

V 146 146 146 156 146 201 146 140 140 158 140 161 140 157 168

I 169 169 169 180 169 229 169 169 169 193 169 195 169 183 195

II 185 185 185 193 185 249 185 177 177 212 177 214 177 196 214

III-IV 193 193 193 206 193 266 193 185 185 209 185 212 185 208 222

V 235 235 235 250 235 323 235 225 225 254 225 258 225 252 270

59

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Alaska Base / City Ketchikan Kodiak Sitka Valdez Arizona Davis-Monthan AFB / Tucson AFB Fort Huachuca Luke Air Force Base Phoenix MCAS Yuma Yuma Proving Ground Arkansas Little Rock AFB Pine Bluff Arsenal Alameda MCLB Barstow Beale AFB MCMWTC Bridgeport MCB Camp Pendleton NWS China Lake NSWC Corona NRTF Dixon Edwards AFB El Centro NAF Fort Hunter Ligget Fort Irwin Fresno ANG NAS Lemoore I 126 150 139 128 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 100 100 100 100 100
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 138 160 148 138 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 110 110 110 110 110

III-IV 144 165 150 146 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 115 115 115 115 115

V 175 201 182 178 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 140 140 140 140 140

I 203 241 224 206 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 161 161 161 161 161

II 222 257 238 222 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 177 177 177 177 177

III-IV 232 266 241 235 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 185 185 185 185 185

V 282 323 294 286 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 225 225 225 225 225

California

118 126 135 164 190 203 218 265 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 100 110 115 140 161 177 185 225 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 100 110 115 140 161 177 185 225 100 110 115 140 161 177 185 225 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 100 100 100 100 100 110 110 110 110 110 115 115 115 115 115 140 140 140 140 140 161 161 161 161 161 177 177 177 177 177 185 185 185 185 185 225 225 225 225 225

60

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State California Base / City Los Angeles AFB / El Segundo Los Angeles March ARB McClellan AFB / Sacramento NWC Mohave Range Presidio of Monterey Point Mugu / Port Hueneme San Diego Region NAS North Island NAB Coronada MCRD MCAS Miramar Naval Medical Ctr San Diego NS Point Loma Moffett Field Onizuka / Sunnyvale San Clemente Island Naval Reservation San Nicolas Island Seal Beach NWS Seal Beach NWS Concord Detachment I
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II

III-IV

II

III-IV

100 110 115 140 161 177 185 225 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 100 110 115 140 161 177 185 225 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 100 110 115 140 161 177 185 225 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 100 100 100 100 110 110 110 110 115 115 115 115 140 140 140 140 161 161 161 161 177 177 177 177 185 185 185 185 225 225 225 225

100

110

115

140

161

177

185

225

100

110

115

140

161

177

185

225

100

110

115

140

161

177

185

225

100 100 100

110 110 110

115 115 115

140 140 140

161 161 161

177 177 177

185 185 185

225 225 225

61

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State California Base / City Sierra Army Depot / Herlong Stockton / San Joaquin Travis AFB MCB Twentynine Palms Vandenberg AFB Buckley AFB / Aurora Denver Fort Carson Cheyenne Mountain AS / NORAD Peterson AFB / Colorado Springs Schriever AFB USAF Academy NSB New London / Groton Dover AFB Washington Region Bolling AFB Anacostia NS Fort McNair Marine Barracks NRL Washington NDW / Anacostia Pentagon Walter Reed I 100 100 100 100 100
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 110 110 110 110 110

III-IV 115 115 115 115 115

V 140 140 140 140 140

I 161 161 161 161 161

II 177 177 177 177 177

III-IV 185 185 185 185 185

V 225 225 225 225 225

Colorado

105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 105 105 115 115 120 120 146 146 169 169 185 185 193 193 235 235

105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 124 105 135 115 145 120 176 146 200 169 217 185 233 193 284 235

Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia

105

115

120

146

169

185

193

235

62

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Florida Base / City Avon Park AS Cape Canaveral AFS Eglin AFB Homestead Hurlburt Field NAS Jacksonville /
MCSF Blount Island / Jacksonville NAS Key West Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

I 129 134 131 158 134

II 139 146 141 170 145

III-IV 148 156 152 181 156

V 180 190 185 220 190

I 208 216 211 254 216

II 224 235 227 274 233

III-IV 238 251 245 291 251

V 290 305 297 354 305

116

126

136

165

187

203

219

266

170 133 119 155 127 125 138 142 131 122 134 105 105 105 105 105 105 115 121 115 105

180 143 129 167 137 135 150 153 140 133 146 115 115 115 115 115 115 126 134 124 115

200 151 140 178 146 145 160 165 150 144 156 120 120 120 120 120 120 137 147 136 120

243 184 170 216 178 176 195 201 182 175 190 146 146 146 146 146 146 167 179 165 146

274 214 192 249 204 201 222 229 211 196 216 169 169 169 169 169 169 185 195 185 169

290 230 208 269 220 217 241 246 225 214 235 185 185 185 185 185 185 203 216 200 185

322 243 225 286 235 233 257 266 241 232 251 193 193 193 193 193 193 220 237 219 193

391 296 274 348 286 284 313 323 294 282 305 235 235 235 235 235 235 268 288 266 235

MacDill AFB NAS Mayport HQ Southcom / Miami Orlando NAS Panama City Patrick AFB NAS Pensacola Tampa Tyndall AFB NAS Whiting Field / Milton Georgia MCLB Albany Athens NCSC Dobbins AFB / Atlanta NAS Fort Benning Fort Gordon Fort McPherson / Fort Gillem Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield / Savannah NSB Kings Bay Moody AFB

63

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Georgia Hawaii Base / City Robins AFB PMRF Barking Sands, Kauai MCBH Kaneohe Bay Pohakuloa Training Area Pearl Harbor Region: Camp H.M. Smith Fort Shafter Hickam AFB Pearl Harbor Tripler AMC Wahiawa Region: Lualualei Wahiawa Naval Reservation Wheeler AFB Schofield Barracks ARD Bayview Boise ANG Mountain Home AFB Illinois Fort Sheridan / Chicago Great Lakes Rock Island Arsenal Scott AFB Springfield Indiana Crane NWSC Grissom ARB 115 130 145 176 185 209 233 283 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR I
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II

III-IV

II

III-IV

105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 115 130 145 176 185 209 233 283 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 115 130 145 176 185 209 233 283 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 115 130 145 176 185 209 233 283 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR

115 130 145 176 185 209 233 283 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR

Idaho

105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105

115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115

120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120

146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146

169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169

185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185

193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193

235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235

64

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Indiana Base / City Fort Benjamin Harrison / Indianapolis Des Moines Fort Leavenworth Fort Riley McConnell AFB Kentucky Fort Campbell Fort Knox Louisville Richmond Louisiana Barksdale AFB Fort Polk / Leesville NAS JRB New Orleans / Belle Chasse NAS Brunswick NRTF Cutler PNSY Kittery Winter Harbor NSGA Maryland Aberdeen Proving Ground Adelphi Andrews AFB Carderock NSWC / Bethesda Bloods Island Edgewood Arsenal Fort Detrick / Fredrick Fort Meade Indian Head NSWC I 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 137 105 105 111 106 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 148 116 115 121 116 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115

III-IV 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 122 158 124 121 132 125 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120

V 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 148 192 151 147 161 152 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146

I 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 220 169 169 179 171 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169

II 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 238 187 185 195 187 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185

III-IV 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 196 254 200 195 212 201 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193

V 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 239 309 243 237 258 245 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235

Iowa Kansas

Maine

65

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Maryland Base / City Martin State ANG NS Pax River , Webster Field / St. Inigoes U.S. Naval Academy / Annapolis Massachusetts Fort Devens / Ayer Hanscom AFB Natick Otis AGB / Falmouth Westover ARB Michigan Battle Creek Detroit Arsenal / Warren Selfridge ANG Base Minnesota Mississippi Minneapolis St Paul Stennis / Bay St. Louis Columbus AFB Gulfport Jackson Keesler AFB NAS Meridian Pascagoula NS Missouri Vicksburg Fort Leonard Wood Kansas City Overland St. Louis Whiteman AFB I 105 105
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 115 115

III-IV 120 120

V 146 146

I 169 169

II 185 185

III-IV 193 193

V 235 235

105

115

120

146

169

185

193

235

111 115 117 131 108 105 105 105 105 144 105 147 105 148 106 149 105 105 105 105 105 105

122 125 127 140 119 115 115 115 115 158 115 160 115 160 116 160 115 115 115 115 115 115

132 136 138 151 128 120 120 120 120 171 120 174 120 176 122 177 120 120 120 120 120 120

161 165 168 184 156 146 146 146 146 208 146 212 146 214 148 215 146 146 146 146 146 146

179 185 188 211 174 169 169 169 169 232 169 237 169 238 171 240 169 169 169 169 169 169

196 201 204 225 192 185 185 185 185 254 185 257 185 257 187 257 185 185 185 185 185 185

212 219 222 243 206 193 193 193 193 275 193 280 193 283 196 285 193 193 193 193 193 193

258 266 270 296 250 235 235 235 235 335 235 341 235 344 239 346 235 235 235 235 235 235

66

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Montana Base / City Great Falls ANG Malmstrom AFB Nebraska Offutt AFB Lincoln Nevada NAS Fallon Indian Springs AFS Nellis AFB New Jersey Nellis AF Range NWS Earle / Colts Neck Fort Dix / Trenton Fort Monmouth Lakehurst McGuire AFB Picatinny Arsenal New Mexico Albuquerque Cannon AFB Holloman AFB Kirtland AFB White Sands New York Buffalo Fort Drum Fort Hamilton / Brooklyn Griffis AFB / Rome NIAGARA FALLS IAP NSU Saratoga Springs
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

I II III-IV V I II III-IV V 105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 105 105 105 105 105 105 107 105 109 108 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 106 105 105 105 115 115 115 115 115 115 117 115 119 118 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 116 115 115 115 120 120 120 120 120 120 126 122 128 127 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 123 120 120 120 146 146 146 146 146 146 153 148 156 154 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 150 146 146 146 169 169 169 169 169 169 172 169 175 174 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 171 169 169 169 185 185 185 185 185 185 188 185 192 190 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 187 185 185 185 193 193 193 193 193 193 203 196 206 204 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 198 193 193 193 235 235 235 235 235 235 247 239 250 249 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 241 235 235 235

67

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State New York Base / City Stewart ANG / Newburgh Syracuse West Point Watervliet Arsenal / Albany MCAS Cherry Point Fort Bragg Harvey Point Jacksonville Region MCB Camp Lejeune MCAS New
River Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

I 105 105

II 115 115

III-IV 120 120

V 146 146

I 169 169

II 185 185

III-IV 193 193

V 235 235

105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 105 128 109 114 115 138 119 122 120 147 128 131 146 179 156 159 169 206 175 183 185 222 192 196 193 237 206 211 235 288 250 256

North Carolina

130

140

148

180

209

225

238

290

Pope AFB Raleigh Seymour

Johnson AFB

109 105 113 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105

119 115 122 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 115

127 120 131 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120

154 146 159 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146

175 169 182 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 169

192 185 196 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185

204 193 211 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193

249 235 256 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235 235

North Dakota

Grand Forks AFB NRTF La Moure Minot AFB

Ohio

Cleveland DSC Whitehall / Columbus Wright-Patterson AFB Youngstown ARS / Vienna Altus AFB Fort Sill McAlester Army Ammunition Plant Tinker AFB / Oklahoma City

Oklahoma

68

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Oklahoma Base / City Tulsa Vance AFB Oregon Pennsylvania Portland ARS Coraopolis / Pittsburg Carlisle Barracks Fort Indiantown Gap / Annville Letterkenny / Chambersburg Mechanicsburg Philadelphia New Cumberland / Defense Depot Susquehanna Tobyhanna Army Depot Willow Grove ARS / NAS Rhode Island South Carolina NS Newport MCAS Beaufort Charleston Region: Charleston AFB NWS Charleston Columbia Region: McEntire Fort Jackson Shaw AFB MCRD Parris Island South Dakota Tennessee Ellsworth AFB Arnold AFB 110 120 131 159 177 193 211 256 130 144 154 187 209 232 248 301 I 105 105
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 115 115

III-IV 120 120

V 146 146

I 169 169

II 185 185

III-IV 193 193

V 235 235

100 110 115 140 161 177 185 225 SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 169 169 169 169 169 169 169 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 235 235 235 235 235 235 235

105 105 129 125

115 115 140 139

120 120 150 152

146 146 182 185

169 169 208 201

185 185 225 224

193 193 241 245

235 235 294 297

126 105 105

140 115 115

152 120 120

185 146 146

203 169 169

225 185 185

245 193 193

297 235 235

69

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Tennessee Base / City NSWC LCC / Memphis NSA Mid-South / Millington Nashville NAS JRB, Carswell / Fort Worth NAS Corpus Christi Dallas / Irving Dyess AFB Ellington ANG / Houston Fort Bliss / El Paso Fort Hood / Killeen Goodfellow AFB NS Ingleside NAS Kingsville Laughlin AFB Red River Army Depot / Texarkana San Antonio Region Brooks AFB Fort Sam Houston Kelly AFB Lackland AFB Randolph AFB Utah Sheppard AFB Dugway Proving Ground Hill AFB Salt Lake City 105 105 105 105 115 115 115 115 120 120 120 120 146 146 146 146 169 169 169 169 185 185 185 185 193 193 193 193 235 235 235 235 105 115 120 146 169 185 193 235 I 105 105 105 105 137 105 105 132 105 105 105 136 129 105 105
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 115 115 115 115 149 115 115 141 115 115 115 146 137 115 115

III-IV 120 120 120 120 158 120 120 150 120 120 120 155 146 120 120

V 146 146 146 146 192 146 146 182 146 146 146 188 178 146 146

I 169 169 169 169 220 169 169 212 169 169 169 219 208 169 169

II 185 185 185 185 240 185 185 227 185 185 185 235 220 185 185

III-IV 193 193 193 193 254 193 193 241 193 193 193 249 235 193 193

V 235 235 235 235 309 235 235 294 235 235 235 303 286 235 235

Texas

70

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Utah Virginia Base / City Tooele Army Depot Dahlgren Dam Neck / Virginia Beach Ocean front Fort A. P. Hill Fort Belvoir Fort Eustis Fort Lee Fort Monroe Fort Myer Fort Story Henderson Hall / Arlington Langley AFB / Hampton NAB Little Creek Norfolk Region: Camp Elmore Craney Island Depot Norfolk Naval Base Norfolk Shipyard Naval Hospital / Portsmouth NSA Northwest / Chesapeake NAS Oceana / Virginia Beach MCB Quantico Radford AAP Defense Supply Ctr / Richmond Wallops Island 108 117 124 151 174 188 200 243 I 105 105 114 105 105 105 105 107 105 113 105 106 110
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 115 115 123 115 115 115 115 116 115 121 115 115 118

III-IV 120 120 133 120 120 120 120 123 120 131 120 121 127

V 146 146 162 146 146 146 146 150 146 159 146 147 154

I 169 169 183 169 169 169 169 172 169 182 169 171 177

II 185 185 198 185 185 185 185 187 185 195 185 185 190

III-IV 193 193 214 193 193 193 193 198 193 211 193 195 204

V 235 235 260 235 235 235 235 241 235 256 235 237 249

108 109 113 105 105 105 116

117 118 121 115 115 115 125

125 127 131 120 120 120 134

152 154 159 146 146 146 163

174 175 182 169 169 169 187

188 190 195 185 185 185 201

201 204 211 193 193 193 216

245 249 256 235 235 235 262

71

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Virginia Base / City Yorktown Region: Camp Perry Cheatham Annex Yorktown NWS Washington NS Everett Fairchild AFB Fort Lewis / Tacoma Indian Island SWC NRS Jim Creek Keyport / Bangor Engin. Sta Annex McChord AFB Puget Sound Region: Bangor NSB Bremerton NS Puget Sound NSY NAS Whidbey Island / Oak Harbor Seattle Allegheny Ballistics Lab Beckley Huntington Sugar Grove NRS Wisconsin Fort McCoy General Mitchell AFRC / Milwaukee Madison 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 115 115 115 115 115 115 115 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 161 161 161 161 161 161 161 177 177 177 177 177 177 177 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 225 225 225 225 225 225 225 I
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II

III-IV

II

III-IV

105

115

120

146

169

185

193

235

100

110

115

140

161

177

185

225

100 100 105 105 105 105 105 105 105

110 110 115 115 115 115 115 115 115

115 115 120 120 120 120 120 120 120

140 140 146 146 146 146 146 146 146

161 161 169 169 169 169 169 169 169

177 177 185 185 185 185 185 185 185

185 185 193 193 193 193 193 193 193

225 225 235 235 235 235 235 235 235

West Virginia

72

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-1

State Wyoming American Samoa Mariana Islands Base / City F. E. Warren AFB Pago Pago / Tutuila Island Guam Saipan / Tinian Puerto Rico NRTF Aguada Fort Buchanan Ramey AFB NS Roosevelt Roads Sebana Seca NRS I 105 150 180 177 140 150 140 156 149
Wind Speed (mph) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) Risk Category

II 115 160 195 190 151 159 150 169 158

III-IV 120 170 210 203 160 168 161 178 166

V 146 207 255 247 195 204 196 216 202

I 169 241 290 285 225 241 225 251 240

II 185 257 314 306 243 256 241 272 254

III-IV 193 274 338 327 257 270 259 286 267

V 235 333 411 397 313 329 315 348 325

Notes to TABLE E-1, WIND LOADING DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS SWR - Special wind regions where unusual geographic conditions require consideration for potential unusual wind conditions. The wind speeds shown are minimum values. The potential for higher wind speeds due to unusual geographic conditions should also be considered. 1) Wind speeds for NWS China Lake have been increased based on local information.

73

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE E-2 - SNOW LOADING AND FROST PENETRATION DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

Table E-2
State Alabama Base / City Anniston Army Depot Birmingham Fort McClellan Fort Rucker Maxwell-Gunther AFB / Montgomery Mobile Redstone Arsenal / Huntsville Alaska Clear AS Eielson AFB Elmendorf AFB Fort Greely Fort Richardson Fort Wainwright Galena AFB Juneau Ketchikan Kodiak Sitka Valdez Arizona Davis-Monthan AFB / Tucson AFB Fort Huachuca Luke Air Force Base Phoenix MCAS Yuma Yuma Proving Ground Arkansas Little Rock AFB Pine Bluff Arsenal

Ground Snow

Frost Penetration (b)

Ground Snow

Frost Penetration (b)

(psf) 5 5 5 0 5 0 10 60 70 50 60 50 60 60 60 30 50 170 5 10 0 0 0 0 10 10

(in) 6 6 6 0 4 0 9

(kPa) 0.24 0.24 0.24 0 0.24 0 0.48 2.87

(mm) 152 152 152 0 102 0 229

permafrost 129 Permafrost 129 permafrost 86 86 56 136 0 0 5 0 0 0 14 9

2.87 2.4 2.87 2.4 2.87 2.87 2.87 0 1.44 2.4 7.66 0 0.48 0 0 0 0 0.48 0.48

permafrost 3277 permafrost 3277 permafrost 2184 2184 1422 3454 0 0 127 0 0 0 356 229

74

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State California Base / City Alameda MCLB Barstow Beale AFB MCMWTC Bridgeport MCB Camp Pendleton NWS China Lake NSWC Corona NRTF Dixon Edwards AFB El Centro NAF Fort Hunter Ligget Fort Irwin Fresno ANG NAS Lemoore Los Angeles AFB / El Segundo Los Angeles March ARB McClellan AFB / Sacramento NWC Mohave Range Presidio of Monterey Point Mugu / Port Hueneme San Diego Region NAS North Island NAB Coronada MCRD MCAS Miramar Naval Medical Ctr San Diego NS Point Loma Moffett Field Onizuka /

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 0 5 0 150 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(in) 18

(kPa) 0 0 0

(mm) 457

36 4 22 0 0 22 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 5 22 4 0

7.19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

914 102 559 0 0 559 0 0 559 0 0 0 0 0 127 559 102 0

75

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State California Base / City Sunnyvale San Clemente Island Naval Reservation San Nicolas Island Seal Beach NWS Seal Beach NWS Concord Detachment Sierra Army Depot / Herlong Stockton / San Joaquin Travis AFB MCB Twentynine Palms Vandenberg AFB Buckley AFB / Aurora Denver Fort Carson Cheyenne Mountain AS / NORAD Peterson AFB / Colorado Springs Schriever AFB Connecticut Delaware Dover AFB USAF Academy NSB New London / Groton

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf)

(in)

(kPa)

(mm)

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

15 0 0 5 0 20 20 15 15 30 30 30 30 25 38

54 4 0 5 0 52 52 38 38

0.72 0 0 0 0 0.96 0.96 0.72 0.72 1.44 1.44

1372 102 0 127 0 1321 1321 965 965 965

Colorado

38 38 22

1.44 1.44 1.2

965 965 559

76

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State District of Columbia Base / City Washington Region Bolling AFB Anacostia NS Fort McNair Marine Barracks NRL Washington NDW / Anacostia Pentagon Walter Reed Avon Park AS Cape Canaveral AFS Eglin AFB Homestead Hurlburt Field NAS Jacksonville / MCSF Blount Island / Jacksonville NAS Key West
MacDill AFB

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf)

(in)

(kPa)

(mm)

25

26

1.2

660

Florida

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 10

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.24 0.24

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NAS Mayport HQ Southcom / Miami Orlando NAS Panama City Patrick AFB NAS Pensacola Tampa Tyndall AFB NAS Whiting Field / Milton Georgia MCLB Albany Athens NCSC Dobbins AFB / Atlanta NAS Fort Benning Fort Gordon

0 0

0.24 0.48

0 0

77

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State Georgia Base / City Fort McPherson / Fort Gillem Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield / Savannah NSB Kings Bay Moody AFB Hawaii Robins AFB PMRF Barking Sands, Kauai MCBH Kaneohe Bay Pohakuloa Training Area Pearl Harbor Region: Camp H.M. Smith Fort Shafter Hickam AFB Pearl Harbor Tripler AMC Wahiawa Region: Lualualei Wahiawa Naval Reservation Wheeler AFB Schofield Barracks ARD Bayview Boise ANG Mountain Home AFB Fort Sheridan / Chicago Great Lakes Rock Island Arsenal Scott AFB Springfield Indiana Crane NWSC

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0

(in)

(kPa) 0.24

(mm)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0.24 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Idaho

10 10 20 25 30 20 20 20 20 36 64 59 64 64 38

0.48 0.48 0.96 1.2 1.2 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 914 1626 1499 1626 1626 965

Illinois

78

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State Indiana Base / City Grissom ARB Fort Benjamin Harrison / Indianapolis Des Moines Fort Leavenworth Fort Riley McConnell AFB Kentucky Fort Campbell Fort Knox Louisville Richmond Louisiana Barksdale AFB Fort Polk / Leesville NAS JRB New Orleans / Belle Chasse Maine NAS Brunswick NRTF Cutler PNSY Kittery Winter Harbor NSGA Aberdeen Proving Ground Adelphi Andrews AFB Carderock NSWC / Bethesda Bloods Island Edgewood Arsenal Fort Detrick / Fredrick Fort Meade Indian Head NSWC Martin State ANG

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 20 20 25 20 20 25 15 15 15 15 5 5 0 60 50 50 50 25 25 25 25 20 25 30 25 25 25

(in) 49 44 82 54 52 38 22 32 32 7 0 0 86 86 48 86 29 24 26 20

(kPa) 0.96 0.96 1.2 0.96 0.96 1.2 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.24 0.24 0 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.96

(mm) 1245 1118 2083 1372 1321 965 559 813 813 0 178 0 0 2184 2184 1220 2184 737 610 660 508

Iowa Kansas

Maryland

29 29 26 22 29

1.2 1.44 1.2 1.2 1.2

737 737 660 559 737

79

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State Maryland Base / City NS Pax River , Webster Field / St. Inigoes U.S. Naval Academy / Annapolis Fort Devens / Ayer Hanscom AFB Natick Otis AGB / Falmouth Westover ARB Michigan Battle Creek Detroit Arsenal / Warren Selfridge ANG Base Minnesota Mississippi Minneapolis St Paul Stennis / Bay St. Louis Columbus AFB Gulfport Jackson Keesler AFB NAS Meridian Pascagoula NS Vicksburg Missouri Fort Leonard Wood Kansas City Overland St. Louis Whiteman AFB Montana Nebraska Nevada Great Falls ANG Malmstrom AFB Offutt AFB Lincoln NAS Fallon

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 20

(in) 26

(kPa) 0.96

(mm) 660

25 50 50 50 35 35 30 25 25 50 0 10 0 5 0 5 0 5 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 25 25 10

26 64 54

1.2 2.4 2.4 2.4

660 1626 1372

Massachusetts

38 64

1.2 1.68 1.44

965 1626

61 59 125

1.2 1.2 2.4 0

1549 1499 3175

7 0 5 0 5 0 36 49 38 46 107 107 73 64 23

0.48 0 0.24 0 0.24 0 0.24 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.2 1.2 0.24

178 0 127 0 127 0 914 1245 965 1168 2718 2718 1854 1626 584

80

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State Nevada Base / City Indian Springs AFS Nellis AFB New Jersey Nellis AF Range NWS Earle / Colts Neck Fort Dix / Trenton Fort Monmouth Lakehurst McGuire AFB Picatinny Arsenal New Mexico Albuquerque Cannon AFB Holloman AFB Kirtland AFB White Sands New York Buffalo Fort Drum Fort Hamilton / Brooklyn Griffis AFB / Rome NIAGARA FALLS IAP NSU Saratoga Springs Stewart ANG / Newburgh Syracuse West Point Watervliet Arsenal / Albany North Carolina MCAS Cherry Point Fort Bragg Harvey Point

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 5 5 5 20 25 25 25 25 35 10 15 5 10 5 45 70 25 60 35 50 35 40 35 40 10 10 10

(in) 7 7 7

(kPa) 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.96

(mm) 178 178 178

29 32 29 29 52 18 18 4 18 4 59 94

1.2 0.96 1.2 1.2 1.68 0.48 0.72 0.24 0.48 0.24 2.16 3.35 1.2

737 813 737 737 1321 457 457 102 457 102 1499 2388

86 59

2.87 1.68 2.4

2184 1499

54 73 54 82 0 0 0

1.68 1.92 1.44 1.92 0.48 0.48 0.48

1372 1854 1372 2083 0 0 0

81

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State North Carolina Base / City Jacksonville Region MCB Camp
Lejeune

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 10

(in) 0

(kPa) 0.48

(mm) 0

MCAS New River Pope AFB Raleigh Seymour Johnson

AFB

10 15 10 60 40 40 20 20 20 20 10 10 10 10 10 15 10 25 25 35 30 25 25

0.48 0.72

4 156 163 52 46 49

0.48 2.87 1.92 1.92 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96

102 3962 4140 1321 1168 1245

North Dakota

Grand Forks AFB NRTF La Moure Minot AFB

Ohio Cleveland DSC Whitehall / Columbus Wright-Patterson AFB Youngstown ARS / Vienna Oklahoma Altus AFB Fort Sill McAlester Army Ammunition Plant Tinker AFB / Oklahoma City Tulsa Vance AFB Oregon Pennsylvania Portland ARS Coraopolis / Pittsburg Carlisle Barracks Fort Indiantown Gap / Annville Letterkenny / Chambersburg Mechanicsburg Philadelphia

14 14 16 18 23 22 14 38 36 49 36

0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.72 0.48 1.2 1.2 1.68 1.44 1.2

356 356 406 457 584 559 356 965 914 1245 914

30

1.2

762

82

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State Pennsylvania Base / City New Cumberland / Defense Depot Susquehanna Tobyhanna Army Depot Willow Grove ARS / NAS Rhode Island South Carolina NS Newport MCAS Beaufort Charleston Region: Charleston AFB NWS Charleston Columbia Region: McEntire Fort Jackson Shaw AFB MCRD Parris Island Ellsworth AFB Arnold AFB NSWC LCC / Memphis NSA Mid-South / Millington Nashville NAS JRB, Carswell / Fort Worth NAS Corpus Christi Dallas / Irving Dyess AFB Ellington ANG / Houston Fort Bliss / El Paso Fort Hood / Killeen Goodfellow AFB NS Ingleside NAS Kingsville

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 25 50 30 30 5

(in)

(kPa) 1.2

(mm) 0

52

2.4 1.44 0 889 0

35 0

1.44 0.24

0.24

10

0.48

South Dakota Tennessee

0 20 10 10 10 10 5 0 5 5 0 10 5 5 0 0

0 86 0

0 0.96 0.48 0.48 0.48

0 2184 0

22 7 0 7 7 0 0 6 5 0 0

0.48 0.24 0 0.24 0.24 0 0.24 0.24 0.24 0 0

559 178 0 178 178 0 0 152 127 0 0

Texas

83

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State Texas Base / City Laughlin AFB Red River Army Depot / Texarkana San Antonio Region Brooks AFB Fort Sam Houston Kelly AFB Lackland AFB Randolph AFB Sheppard AFB Dugway Proving Ground Hill AFB Salt Lake City Tooele Army Depot Virginia Dahlgren Dam Neck / Virginia Beach Ocean front Fort A. P. Hill Fort Belvoir Fort Eustis Fort Lee Fort Monroe Fort Myer Fort Story Henderson Hall / Arlington Langley AFB / Hampton NAB Little Creek Virginia Norfolk Region: Camp Elmore Craney Island Depot Norfolk Naval Base

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 0 5

(in) 0 8

(kPa) 0 0.24

(mm) 0 203

0.24

5 10 47 15 25 25 10 25 25 15 20 10 25 10 25 10 10

11 54 73 59 52 22 5

0.24 0.48 2.26 0.72 1.2 1.2 0.48 1.2

279 1372 1854 1499 1321 559 127

Utah

26 9 14 9 26 9 26 9 9

1.2 0.72 0.96 0.48 1.2 0.48 1.2 0.48 0.48

660 229 356 229 660 229 660 229 229

10

0.48

229

84

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State Virginia Base / City Norfolk Shipyard Naval Hospital / Portsmouth NSA Northwest / Chesapeake NAS Oceana / Virginia Beach MCB Quantico Radford AAP Defense Supply Ctr / Richmond Wallops Island Yorktown Region: Camp Perry Cheatham Annex Yorktown NWS Washington NS Everett Fairchild AFB Fort Lewis / Tacoma Indian Island SWC NRS Jim Creek Keyport / Bangor Engin. Sta Annex McChord AFB Puget Sound Region: Bangor NSB Bremerton NS Puget Sound NSY NAS Whidbey Island / Oak Harbor West Virginia Seattle Allegheny Ballistics Lab Beckley Huntington Sugar Grove NRS

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 10 10 10 25 25 20 20

(in) 9 9 9 22 22 18

(kPa) 0.48 0.48 0.48 1.2 1.2 0.96 0.96

(mm) 229 229 229 559 559 457

15

0.72

229

15 (a) 42 15 (a) 15 (a) 15 (a) 15 (a) 15

64 9

0.72(a) 2.01 0.72(a) 0.72(a) 0.72(a)

1626 229

9 9

0.72(a) 0.72

229 229

15 (a)

0.72(a)

229

15 (a) 20 CS 30 20 30 22 38 9

0.72(a) 0.72 CS 1.44 0.96 1.44 559 965 229

85

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (b) Frost Penetration (b)

Table E-2
State Wisconsin Base / City Fort McCoy General Mitchell AFRC / Milwaukee Madison Wyoming American Samoa Mariana Islands F. E. Warren AFB Pago Pago / Tutuila Island Guam Saipan / Tinian Puerto Rico All

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

(psf) 40 30 35 20 0 0 0 0

(in) 114 75 86 59 0 0 0 0

(kPa) 1.92 1.44 1.44 0.96 0 0 0 0

(mm) 2896 1905 2184 1499 0 0 0 0

Notes to TABLE E-2, SNOW LOADING AND FROST PENETRATION DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS (a) Ground snow load to be used for Navy facilities at identified locations in Washington State equals 25 psf (1.20 kPa). (b) See best practice B-2.3 for footing depths considering frost. CS Site specific case studies are required to establish ground snow loads.

86

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE E-3 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

Table E-3
PGA State Alabama Base / City Anniston Army Depot Birmingham Fort McClellan Fort Rucker Maxwell-Gunther AFB / Montgomery Mobile Redstone Arsenal / Huntsville Alaska Clear AS Eielson AFB Elmendorf AFB Fort Greely Fort Richardson Fort Wainwright Galena AFB Juneau Ketchikan Kodiak Sitka (%g) 12 14 12 4 6 5 12 40 39 50 28 50 40 19 21 10 64 33 SS (%g) 24 26 23 10 14 10 25 98 96 150 72 150 99 44 54 26 154 95 S1 (%g) 10 10 10 6 8 6 12 38 37 68 38 69 38 17 36 23 90 60

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 15 16 15 6 9 7 18 70 69 131 50 130 71 29 38 18 142 68 S1,5/50 (%g) 7 7 7 4 5 4 9 27 26 59 28 60 27 12 26 17 74 47 SS,10/50 (%g) 10 10 10 4 6 4 12 50 49 105 38 104 51 20 28 14 114 54 S1,10/50 (%g) 5 5 5 3 4 3 5 20 19 45 21 46 19 8 20 13 57 37 SS,20/50 (%g) 6 6 6 3 4 2 6 34 33 79 27 78 34 13 20 10 86 41 S1,20/50 (%g) 3 2 3 2 2 1 3 14 13 33 14 33 13 5 14 9 41 28

87

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Alaska Arizona Base / City Valdez Davis-Monthan AFB / Tucson AFB Fort Huachuca Luke Air Force Base Phoenix MCAS Yuma Yuma Proving Ground (a) Arkansas California Little Rock AFB Pine Bluff Arsenal Alameda MCLB Barstow Beale AFB MCMWTC Bridgeport MCB Camp Pendleton (a) NWS China Lake (a) NSWC Corona NRTF Dixon Edwards AFB (a) El Centro NAF (a) Fort Hunter Ligget Fort Irwin (a) (%g) 54 11 10 7 7 26 10 24 18 51 59 18 42 40 43 86 40 38 60 44 38 SS (%g) 150 27 24 17 17 73 31 46 35 150 144 52 110 109 115 225 114 100 157 115 98 S1 (%g) 77 8 7 6 6 27 16 18 15 60 55 25 37 42 39 85 41 43 62 41 38 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 125 18 16 11 12 50 20 32 24 162 104 34 78 76 82 175 79 70 183 80 70 S1,5/50 (%g) 60 5 5 4 4 19 11 13 10 61 38 17 26 30 28 66 29 31 66 29 27 SS,10/50 (%g) 96 11 10 7 8 38 16 17 13 127 71 27 57 58 62 127 61 54 144 60 51 S1,10/50 (%g) 43 3 3 3 3 15 9 6 5 47 27 13 19 23 21 47 23 24 51 22 20 SS,20/50 (%g) 69 7 6 5 5 28 12 7 6 95 47 20 39 43 43 84 45 40 108 43 35 S1,20/50 (%g) 29 2 2 2 2 11 7 2 2 34 18 10 13 17 15 32 17 18 37 16 14

88

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State California Base / City Fresno ANG NAS Lemoore Los Angeles AFB / El Segundo Los Angeles March ARB McClellan AFB / Sacremento NWC Mohave Range (a) Presidio of Monterey Point Mugu / Port Hueneme San Diego Region NAS North Island NAB Coronada MCRD MCAS Miramar Naval Medical Ctr San Diego NS NS Point Loma Moffett Field Onizuka / Sunnyvale San Clemente Island Naval Reservation 54 56 55 44 53 49 53 50 29 121 124 122 106 120 112 120 150 71 46 48 47 41 46 43 46 60 26 85 86 84 74 82 78 84 144 49 31 31 31 28 30 28 31 53 17 52 52 51 49 50 49 52 115 35 20 20 20 20 20 19 20 41 13 31 31 32 33 31 31 32 87 24 13 13 13 14 13 13 13 30 10 (%g) 22 41 60 74 50 19 57 61 78 SS (%g) 61 107 163 202 150 57 140 154 208 S1 (%g) 25 37 60 73 60 27 55 57 73 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 40 76 117 147 144 38 101 113 153 S1,5/50 (%g) 17 27 42 52 57 18 38 41 53 SS,10/50 (%g) 30 56 87 109 113 30 69 80 108 S1,10/50 (%g) 13 20 31 38 44 14 25 29 38 SS,20/50 (%g) 23 40 61 76 84 23 45 53 71 S1,20/50 (%g) 10 15 23 27 32 11 16 19 26

89

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State California Base / City San Nicolas Island Seal Beach NWS Seal Beach NWS Concord Detachment Sierra Army Depot / Herlong Stockton / San Joaquin Travis AFB MCB Twentynine Palms (a) Vandenberg AFB (a) Colorado Buckley AFB / Aurora Denver Fort Carson Cheyenne Mountain AS / NORAD Peterson AFB / Colorado Springs Schriever AFB USAF Academy Connecticut Delaware NSB New London / Groton Dover AFB (%g) 20 58 62 37 58 56 52 37 8 9 9 9 9 8 10 8 6 SS (%g) 52 153 163 95 149 152 135 96 17 18 18 18 17 16 19 16 12 S1 (%g) 22 57 60 34 49 52 48 35 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 35 108 173 69 110 108 96 69 11 11 12 12 11 10 12 10 8 S1,5/50 (%g) 15 39 59 24 35 37 33 25 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 SS,10/50 (%g) 26 78 131 50 77 80 70 50 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 5 S1,10/50 (%g) 12 29 44 17 25 28 25 19 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 SS,20/50 (%g) 19 55 93 33 50 57 49 35 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 S1,20/50 (%g) 9 21 32 12 18 21 18 14 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1

90

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State District of Columbia Base / City Washington Region Bolling AFB Anacostia NS Fort McNair Marine Barracks NRL Washington NDW / Anacostia Pentagon Walter Reed Florida Avon Park AS Cape Canaveral AFS Eglin AFB Homestead Hurlburt Field NAS Jacksonville / MCSF Blount Island / Jacksonville NAS Key West MacDill AFB NAS Mayport HQ Southcom / Miami Orlando NAS Panama City 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 3 3 4 2 4 5 1 3 6 2 4 3 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 7 7 9 4 8 11 2 6 12 4 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 5 2 5 6 1 3 6 2 4 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 5 2 5 8 1 3 8 2 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 1 4 4 1 2 4 1 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 3 4 1 3 4 1 2 5 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 2 0.4 1 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.3 1 1 0.3 1 1 0.3 1 1 (%g) SS (%g) S1 (%g) Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) S1,10/50 (%g) SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

91

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Florida Base / City Patrick AFB NAS Pensacola Tampa Tyndall AFB NAS Whiting Field / Milton Georgia MCLB Albany Athens NCSC Dobbins AFB / Atlanta NAS Fort Benning Fort Gordon Fort McPherson / Fort Gillem Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield / Savannah NSB Kings Bay Moody AFB Hawaii Robins AFB PMRF Barking Sands, Kauai MCBH Kaneohe Bay (%g) 3 4 3 3 5 5 10 10 5 13 8 11 16 6 5 7 9 27 SS (%g) 7 9 6 7 10 11 21 20 12 27 18 22 31 13 11 15 17 59 S1 (%g) 4 5 3 5 6 6 9 9 7 11 9 10 12 7 6 8 5 17 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 4 5 4 5 6 7 14 14 8 18 12 15 21 9 7 10 12 42 S1,5/50 (%g) 2 4 2 3 4 5 7 7 5 7 6 7 8 5 4 6 3 12 SS,10/50 (%g) 2 3 2 3 4 5 9 9 6 11 8 9 11 5 5 7 8 30 S1,10/50 (%g) 1 2 1 2 3 3 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 2 8 SS,20/50 (%g) 1 2 1 2 2 3 6 6 4 6 5 4 5 3 3 4 5 20 S1,20/50 (%g) 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 6

92

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Hawaii Base / City Pearl Harbor Region: Camp H.M. Smith Fort Shafter Hickam AFB Pearl Harbor Tripler AMC Pohakuloa Training Area Wahiawa Region: Lualualei Wahiawa Naval Res Wheeler AFB Idaho Schofield Barracks ARD Bayview Boise ANG Mountain Home AFB Illinois Fort Sheridan / Chicago Great Lakes Rock Island Arsenal Scott AFB Springfield Indiana Crane NWSC Grissom ARB 25 26 26 25 16 12 11 6 6 5 26 10 14 5 54 56 55 55 37 30 26 12 12 11 49 21 29 12 15 16 16 15 12 10 9 6 6 6 18 11 12 7 38 40 40 39 25 20 17 7 7 7 35 15 20 8 10 11 11 10 8 7 6 4 4 4 13 8 9 5 27 28 27 27 16 14 12 5 4 5 22 10 13 6 7 8 8 7 6 5 5 3 2 3 7 4 5 3 17 18 18 18 10 10 8 3 2 3 11 5 7 3 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 1 1 1 3 2 3 2 27 27 26 26 27 58 57 58 57 57 58 150 17 17 16 16 17 60 41 41 41 41 41 154 11 12 11 11 12 69 28 29 28 28 29 127 8 8 8 8 8 57 19 19 19 19 19 113 5 5 5 5 5 44 (%g) SS (%g) S1 (%g) Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) S1,10/50 (%g) SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

93

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Indiana Iowa Kansas Fort Leavenworth Fort Riley Kentucky McConnell AFB Fort Campbell (a) Fort Knox Louisville Richmond Louisiana Barksdale AFB Fort Polk / Leesville NAS JRB New Orleans / Belle Chasse Maine NAS Brunswick NRTF Cutler PNSY Kittery Maryland Winter Harbour NSGA Aberdeen Proving Ground Adelphi Andrews AFB Carderock NSWC / Bethesda Base / City Fort Benjamin Harrison / Indianapolis Des Moines (%g) 7 3 5 8 5 25 10 10 9 6 5 5 12 13 15 10 8 6 6 6 SS (%g) 15 7 11 15 11 49 22 21 19 13 10 9 23 23 27 19 15 12 12 12 S1 (%g) 8 5 6 6 6 20 11 11 9 7 6 5 8 7 8 7 5 5 5 5 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 11 4 7 8 7 36 16 15 13 9 7 6 14 13 16 11 9 8 7 8 S1,5/50 (%g) 6 3 4 4 4 14 8 8 7 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 3 3 3 3 SS,10/50 (%g) 7 3 5 5 4 21 10 10 8 6 4 3 9 8 9 7 5 5 5 5 S1,10/50 (%g) 4 2 3 2 2 8 5 5 4 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 SS,20/50 (%g) 4 2 3 3 3 10 6 6 5 3 2 2 5 4 5 4 3 3 3 3 S1,20/50 (%g) 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1

94

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Maryland Base / City Bloods Island Edgewood Arsenal Fort Detrick / Fredrick Fort Meade Indian Head NSWC Martin State ANG NS Pax River , Webster Field / St. Inigoes U.S. Naval Academy / Annapolis Massachusetts Fort Devens / Ayer Hanscom AFB Natick Otis AGB / Falmouth Westover ARB Michigan Battle Creek Detroit Arsenal / Warren Selfridge ANG Base Minnesota Mississippi Minneapolis St Paul Stennis / Bay St. Louis Columbus AFB Gulfport (%g) 4 7 6 6 6 7 5 6 11 12 10 8 8 4 4 4 2 5 11 5 SS (%g) 10 14 13 12 12 14 11 12 21 22 20 16 17 9 9 9 5 10 23 10 S1 (%g) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 7 7 7 6 7 5 5 5 3 6 12 6 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 6 9 8 8 8 8 7 8 13 13 12 10 11 6 6 6 3 6 17 6 S1,5/50 (%g) 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 4 8 4 SS,10/50 (%g) 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 8 8 7 6 7 4 4 4 2 4 10 4 S1,10/50 (%g) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 5 2 SS,20/50 (%g) 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 5 5 4 3 4 2 2 2 1 2 5 2 S1,20/50 (%g) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1

95

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Mississippi Base / City Jackson Keesler AFB NAS Meridian Pascagoula NS Vicksburg Missouri Fort Leonard Wood Kansas City Overland St. Louis Whiteman AFB Montana Nebraska Nevada Great Falls ANG Malmstrom AFB Offutt AFB Lincoln NAS Fallon Indian Springs AFS Nellis AFB Nellis AF Range (a) New Jersey NWS Earle / Colts Neck Fort Dix / Trenton Fort Monmouth (%g) 8 5 9 5 8 13 5 20 22 6 7 7 5 7 29 20 21 21 13 11 13 SS (%g) 16 10 18 10 16 26 11 39 43 13 19 17 10 13 78 51 53 53 23 20 23 S1 (%g) 9 6 9 6 9 13 7 16 17 8 7 7 5 5 27 17 17 17 6 6 6 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 11 6 12 6 11 19 8 28 31 9 13 12 6 8 54 35 36 36 13 12 13 S1,5/50 (%g) 6 4 6 4 6 9 5 11 12 6 5 5 3 3 19 12 12 12 4 4 4 SS,10/50 (%g) 7 4 8 4 7 11 5 17 19 6 9 8 4 4 40 25 24 24 7 7 7 S1,10/50 (%g) 4 2 4 2 3 5 3 6 7 3 4 3 2 2 15 9 8 8 2 2 2 SS,20/50 (%g) 3 2 4 2 3 5 3 9 9 3 7 6 2 2 29 17 15 15 4 3 4 S1,20/50 (%g) 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 3 3 2 3 2 1 1 11 6 6 6 1 1 1

96

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State New Jersey Base / City Lakehurst McGuire AFB Picatinny Arsenal New Mexico Albuquerque Cannon AFB Holloman AFB Kirtland AFB White Sands New York Buffalo Fort Drum Fort Hamilton / Brooklyn Griffis AFB / Rome NIAGARA FALLS IAP NSU Saratoga Springs Stewart ANG / Newburgh Syracuse West Point Watervliet Arsenal / Albany North Carolina MCAS Cherry Point Fort Bragg Harvey Point (%g) 11 11 14 18 4 13 19 18 12 12 16 8 12 10 11 6 13 9 6 11 4 SS (%g) 20 20 24 44 9 31 47 46 21 24 27 18 21 21 21 14 23 19 12 21 10 S1 (%g) 6 6 7 13 3 10 14 14 6 8 7 7 6 8 7 6 7 7 6 10 5 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 11 12 14 30 6 19 29 22 12 16 15 11 12 13 13 9 13 12 8 15 6 S1,5/50 (%g) 4 4 4 9 2 6 9 7 4 6 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 6 3 SS,10/50 (%g) 7 7 8 18 4 12 18 13 7 10 8 7 7 9 7 6 8 8 5 8 4 S1,10/50 (%g) 2 2 3 6 1 4 6 4 2 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 2 SS,20/50 (%g) 3 3 4 11 2 7 11 7 3 6 4 5 3 5 4 4 4 5 2 4 2 S1,20/50 (%g) 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1

97

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State North Carolina Base / City Jacksonville Region MCB Camp Lejeune MCAS New River Pope AFB Raleigh Seymour Johnson AFB North Dakota Grand Forks AFB NRTF La Moure Minot AFB Ohio Cleveland DSC Whitehall / Columbus Wright-Patterson AFB Youngstown ARS / Vienna Oklahoma Altus AFB Fort Sill McAlester Army Ammunition Plant Tinker AFB / Oklahoma City Tulsa Vance AFB 7 8 11 7 7 2 2 2 10 5 8 10 8 18 9 16 6 9 15 15 21 15 15 4 4 5 17 12 16 18 16 42 18 27 13 17 7 7 10 8 7 2 2 2 6 6 7 6 6 12 8 8 7 6 10 10 15 11 10 2 2 3 10 8 10 10 9 13 11 16 9 10 5 5 6 5 5 1 1 1 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 6 8 6 6 1 1 2 6 5 6 6 5 7 7 9 6 6 3 3 4 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 1 2 2 1 0.4 0.4 0.5 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 (%g) SS (%g) S1 (%g) Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) S1,10/50 (%g) SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

98

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Oregon Pennsylvania Base / City Portland ARS Coraopolis / Pittsburg Carlisle Barracks Fort Indiantown Gap / Annville Letterkenny / Chambersburg Mechanicsburg Philadelphia New Cumberland / Defense Depot Susquehanna Tobyhanna Army Depot Willow Grove ARS / NAS Rhode Island South Carolina NS Newport MCAS Beaufort Charleston Region: Charleston AFB NWS Charleston Columbia Region: McEntire Fort Jackson Shaw AFB 25 23 28 46 42 50 15 15 17 32 29 34 10 10 11 18 17 18 6 6 6 8 8 8 3 3 3 101 111 147 158 49 53 86 95 24 27 34 35 8 9 11 11 3 3 (%g) 42 5 6 8 6 7 11 7 9 12 8 32 SS (%g) 96 11 13 16 12 14 21 14 17 21 16 56 S1 (%g) 40 5 5 6 5 5 6 5 6 6 6 19 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 71 7 8 9 8 8 12 9 10 12 10 35 S1,5/50 (%g) 30 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 11 SS,10/50 (%g) 48 5 5 6 5 5 7 5 6 7 6 18 S1,10/50 (%g) 20 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 5 SS,20/50 (%g) 30 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 7 S1,20/50 (%g) 11 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2

99

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Base / City MCRD Parris Island Ellsworth AFB Arnold AFB NSWC LCC / Memphis NSA Mid-South / Millington Texas Nashville NAS JRB, Carswell / Fort Worth NAS Corpus Christi Dallas / Irving Dyess AFB Ellington ANG / Houston Fort Bliss / El Paso Fort Hood / Killeen Goodfellow AFB NS Ingleside NAS Kingsville Laughlin AFB Red River Army Depot / Texarkana (%g) 27 6 12 50 56 14 4 3 5 3 3 13 3 3 3 3 2 7 SS (%g) 49 12 25 101 113 29 9 6 10 7 7 30 6 6 6 6 5 14 S1 (%g) 17 4 12 35 39 14 5 2 5 4 4 9 4 3 2 2 2 8 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 31 7 18 71 79 21 6 3 6 4 4 20 4 4 3 3 3 10 S1,5/50 (%g) 10 3 9 24 26 10 3 1 4 2 3 6 3 2 1 1 1 6 SS,10/50 (%g) 16 5 12 35 40 13 4 2 4 3 3 13 3 2 2 2 2 6 S1,10/50 (%g) 5 2 5 10 12 6 2 1 2 2 2 4 2 1 1 1 1 3 SS,20/50 (%g) 7 3 7 13 15 7 2 1 2 2 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 3 S1,20/50 (%g) 2 1 3 4 4 3 1 0.3 1 1 1 2 1 1 0.3 0.3 0.4 2

100

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Texas Base / City San Antonio Region Brooks AFB Fort Sam Houston Kelly AFB Lackland AFB Randolph AFB Sheppard AFB Utah Dugway Proving Ground Hill AFB Salt Lake City Tooele Army Depot Virginia Dahlgren Dam Neck / Virginia Beach Ocean front Fort A. P. Hill Fort Belvoir Fort Eustis Fort Lee Fort Monroe Fort Myer Fort Story Henderson Hall / Arlington 4 4 4 4 4 7 15 54 49 30 6 4 7 6 5 8 4 6 4 6 9 8 8 8 8 14 37 129 119 77 12 9 15 12 11 16 10 12 9 12 3 3 3 3 3 6 14 43 44 26 5 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 8 26 82 85 51 8 6 9 8 7 9 6 8 6 8 2 2 2 2 2 4 10 27 30 18 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 5 18 48 51 35 5 3 5 5 4 6 4 5 4 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 7 16 17 12 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 12 28 28 22 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 1 1 0.5 0.4 1 1 5 9 9 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (%g) SS (%g) S1 (%g) Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) S1,10/50 (%g) SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

101

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Virginia Base / City Langley AFB / Hampton NAB Little Creek Norfolk Region: Camp Elmore Craney Island Depot Norfolk Naval Base Norfolk Shipyard Naval Hospital / Portsmouth NSA Northwest / Chesapeake NAS Oceana / Virginia Beach MCB Quantico Defense Supply Ctr / Richmond Radford AAP Wallops Island Yorktown Region: Camp Peary Cheatham Annex Yorktown NWS Washington NS Everett Fairchild AFB Fort Lewis / Tacoma 5 5 5 55 14 50 11 11 10 133 32 128 5 5 5 50 12 51 7 7 7 92 21 92 4 3 3 36 8 37 4 4 4 65 14 68 2 2 2 25 5 26 3 2 2 44 9 48 1 1 1 16 3 18 (%g) 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 6 10 14 4 SS (%g) 10 9 10 10 10 10 9 9 13 19 25 8 S1 (%g) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 9 4 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 10 15 5 S1,5/50 (%g) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 6 3 SS,10/50 (%g) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 6 9 3 S1,10/50 (%g) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 2 SS,20/50 (%g) 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 5 2 S1,20/50 (%g) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1

102

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Washington Base / City Indian Island SWC NRS Jim Creek Keyport / Bangor Engin. Sta Annex McChord AFB Puget Sound Region: Bangor NSB Bremerton NS Puget Sound NSY NAS Whidbey Island / Oak Harbor Seattle West Virginia Allegheny Ballistics Lab Beckley Huntington Sugar Grove NRS Wisconsin Fort McCoy General Mitchell AFRC / Milwaukee Madison Wyoming American Samoa Mariana Islands F. E. Warren AFB Pago Pago / Tutuila Island Guam 66 63 66 54 60 6 10 7 6 3 4 4 8 17 90 157 152 157 129 144 12 19 15 14 5 9 8 16 41 279 61 60 61 51 56 5 8 7 6 4 5 5 6 16 68 109 107 109 93 101 7 12 10 9 3 6 5 11 30 208 43 43 43 37 40 4 5 5 4 3 3 3 4 11 51 76 76 77 66 73 5 7 6 6 2 3 3 7 21 151 30 30 30 26 28 3 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 8 37 52 52 52 44 49 3 4 4 3 1 2 2 4 14 105 19 20 20 16 18 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 6 25 (%g) 54 47 52 50 SS (%g) 130 116 133 128 S1 (%g) 53 45 53 50 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 94 84 96 92 S1,5/50 (%g) 38 33 39 36 SS,10/50 (%g) 69 61 72 69 S1,10/50 (%g) 27 23 28 26 SS,20/50 (%g) 47 42 50 48 S1,20/50 (%g) 18 16 19 18

103

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table E-3

PGA State Mariana Islands Puerto Rico Base / City Saipan / Tinian NRTF Aguada Fort Buchanan Ramey AFB NS Roosevelt Roads Sebana Seca NRS (%g) 58 49 41 50 40 41 SS (%g) 178 131 100 134 98 101 S1 (%g) 45 50 40 50 37 40 Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS,5/50 (%g) 129 91 71 94 69 72 S1,5/50 (%g) 33 35 29 36 27 29 SS,10/50 (%g) 92 68 53 70 52 54 S1,10/50 (%g) 23 26 22 27 20 22 SS,20/50 (%g) 64 48 38 51 37 38 S1,20/50 (%g) 16 19 15 19 14 15

Notes to TABLE E-3, EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS (a) Seismic parameters are provided at the geographic centroid of the installation. However, due to the size of the installation and the considerable variation of the seismic accelerations over short distances within the installation, location specific parameters shall be determined using the USGS U.S. Seismic Design Map Web Application, which could result in higher seismic parameters than provided in this table.

104

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 APPENDIX F SITE-SPECIFIC STRUCTURAL LOADING DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS F-1 WIND LOADING DATA TABLE.

Site-specific structural wind loading data for potential DoD locations outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table F-1. F-2 SNOW LOADING AND FROST PENETRATION DATA TABLE.

Site-specific structural snow loading and frost penetration data for potential DoD locations outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table F-2. F-3 EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA TABLE.

Site-specific earthquake loading data for potential DoD locations outside of the United States, its territories and possessions is provided in Table F-3.

105

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1 - WIND LOADING DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

TABLE F-1
Continent / Region Country
Africa Djibouti Egypt Morocco Asia Afghanistan Bahrain India

Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category

Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Djibouti Alexandria Casablanca Kabul NSA Bahrain Bombay Calcutta Madras New Delhi

I 106 100 106 100 (92) 100 107 134 108 107 100 (0) 100 (0) 118 141 248 119 212 118 118

II 114 110 114 110 (99) 110 115 144 116 115 110 (0) 110 (0) 126 152 265 128 227 126 126

III-IV 122 115 122 115 (105) 115 123 154 124 123 115 (0) 115 (0) 135 162 284 137 243 135 135

V 148 140 148 140 (128) 140 150 187 151 150 140 (0) 140 (0) 164 197 345 166 296 164 164

I 171 161 171 161 (148) 161 173 216 175 173 161 (0) 161 (0) 190 228 398 192 341 190 190

II 183 177 183 177 (159) 177 185 232 187 185 177 (0) 177 (0) 203 244 427 205 366 203 203

III-IV 196 185 196 185 (170) 185 198 248 200 198 185 (0) 185 (0) 218 261 457 220 392 218 218

V 238 225 238 225 (206) 225 241 302 243 241 225 (0) 225 (0) 265 318 556 267 476 265 265

Iraq Japan

Baghdad Basra NAF Atsugi MCAS Iwakuni Iwo Jima Misawa AFB Okinawa (All installations) Sagamihara Sasebo

106

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Asia Japan Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Tokyo COMFLTACT Yokosuka Yokota AFB, Honshu Camp Zama

I 118 118 118 118 100 (0)

II 126 126 126 126 110 (0)

III-IV 135 135 135 135 115 (0)

V 164 164 164 164 140 (0)

I 190 190 190 190 161 (0)

II 203 203 203 203 177 (0)

III-IV 218 218 218 218 185 (0)

V 265 265 265 265 225 (0)

Kuwait Oman

Kuwait City Areas south and west of Jabal Akehadar - Ibri - Nazwa Batinah Coast - Ash Shinash - Sib - Suhar Central, Southern, and Coastal Areas Sur to Sarfait - Barik - Dawqa - Hayma - Salalah - Shalim

124 124 124 124 124

133 133 133 133 133

142 142 142 142 142

173 173 173 173 173

199 199 199 199 199

214 214 214 214 214

229 229 229 229 229

278 278 278 278 278

136 136 136 136 136

145 145 145 145 145

156 156 156 156 156

189 189 189 189 189

218 218 218 218 218

234 234 234 234 234

250 250 250 250 250

304 304 304 304 304

107

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Asia Oman Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
High Jabal Locations - Miskin - Sumail - Rikshah - Shaww Kuria Muria Island Masirah Island Mussandam Island

II

III-IV

II

III-IV

136 136 136 136 141 141 141 104 100 (0) 103 100 (94) 100 (94) 100 (94) 100 (94) 100 (94)

145 145 145 145 152 152 152 111 110 (0) 110 110 (101) 110 (101) 110 (101) 110 (101) 110 (101)

156 156 156 156 162 162 162 119 115 (0) 118 115 (108) 115 (108) 115 (108) 115 (108) 115 (108)

189 189 189 189 197 197 197 145 140 (0) 143 140 (132) 140 (132) 140 (132) 140 (132) 140 (132)

218 218 218 218 228 228 228 167 161 (0) 165 161 (152) 161 (152) 161 (152) 161 (152) 161 (152)

234 234 234 234 244 244 244 179 177 (0) 177 177 (163) 177 (163) 177 (163) 177 (163) 177 (163)

250 250 250 250 261 261 261 192 185 (0) 189 185 (174) 185 (174) 185 (174) 185 (174) 185 (174)

304 304 304 304 318 318 318 233 225 (0) 230 225 (212) 225 (212) 225 (212) 225 (212) 225 (212)

Pakistan Qatar Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia

Peshawar Doha Dhahran Hafr al Batin Khamis Mushayt Jeddah Jubail Qadimah

108

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Asia Saudi Arabia Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Riyadh Tabuk

I 100 (94) 100 (94) 124 130 112 124 124 118 112 130 124 136 124 124 141 112 112

II 110 (101) 110 (101) 133 139 120 133 133 126 120 139 133 145 133 133 152 120 120

III-IV 115 (108) 115 (108) 142 149 128 142 142 135 128 149 142 156 142 142 162 128 128

V 140 (132) 140 (132) 173 181 156 173 173 164 156 181 173 189 173 173 197 156 156

I 161 (152) 161 (152) 199 209 180 199 199 190 180 209 199 218 199 199 228 180 180

II 177 (163) 177 (163) 214 224 193 214 214 203 193 224 214 234 214 214 244 193 193

III-IV 185 (174) 185 (174) 229 239 207 229 229 218 207 239 229 250 229 229 261 207 207

V 225 (212) 225 (212) 278 291 251 278 278 265 251 291 278 304 278 278 318 251 251

South Korea

Camp Casey Camp Hialeah, Busan Camp Humphreys / Pyongtaek Chinhae Kimpo AFB Kunsan / Kunsan City Osan AFB / Songtan Pohang Seoul Taegu Uijongbu Yongsan

Vietnam

Da Nang Ho Chi Minh City Nha Trang

109

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Asia Taiwan Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Tainan Taipei Tsoying

I 141 153 130 100 (94) 112 100 100 117 100 (83) 100 (0) 112 112

II 152 164 139 110 (101) 120 110 110 125 110 (88) 110 (0) 120 120 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0)

III-IV 162 176 149 115 (108) 128 115 115 134 115 (95) 115 (0) 128 128 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0)

V 197 214 181 140 (132) 156 140 140 163 140 (115) 140 (0) 156 156 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0)

I 228 247 209 161 (152) 180 161 161 188 161 (133) 161 (0) 180 180 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0)

II 244 264 224 177 (163) 193 177 177 201 177 (142) 177 (0) 193 193 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0)

III-IV 261 283 239 185 (174) 207 185 185 215 185 (152) 185 (0) 207 207 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0)

V 318 344 291 225 (212) 251 225 225 262 225 (185) 225 (0) 251 251 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0)

Thailand

Bangkok Chiang Mai Sattahip Udonthani

Turkey Turkey

Ankara Incirlik AB / Adana Izmir AS Karamursel

Central America Europe

Canal Zone Belgium Brussels Kester Kleine Brogel Shape Chievres Bosnia Herzegovina Tuzla AFB

100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0)

110

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Europe England Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
RAF Alconbury, Molesworth / Huntingdon Birmingham RAF Croughton / Brackley RAF Fairford RAF Lakenheath / Lakeheath Village USNA UK / London RAF Menwith Hill / Harrogate RAF Mildenhall Plymouth RAF Upwood / Ramsey JMF St. Mawgan / Cornwall Sculthorpe AB Southport South Shields Spurn Head

II

III-IV

II

III-IV

100 (0) 105 118 100 (0) 118

110 (0) 112 126 110 (0) 126

115 (0) 120 135 115 (0) 135

140 (0) 146 164 140 (0) 164

161 (0) 169 190 161 (0) 190

177 (0) 181 203 177 (0) 203

185 (0) 194 218 185 (0) 218

225 (0) 236 265 225 (0) 265

112 100 (0) 123 111 100 (0) 100 (0) 117 123 117 117

120 110 (0) 131 119 110 (0) 110 (0) 125 131 125 125

128 115 (0) 141 127 115 (0) 115 (0) 134 141 134 134

156 140 (0) 171 155 140 (0) 140 (0) 163 171 163 163

180 161 (0) 197 178 161 (0) 161 (0) 188 197 188 188

193 177 (0) 211 191 177 (0) 177 (0) 201 211 201 201

207 185 (0) 226 205 185 (0) 185 (0) 215 226 215 215

251 225 (0) 275 249 225 (0) 225 (0) 262 275 262 262

111

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Europe Germany Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Ansbach Bamberg Baumholder Bremen Buechel Air Base / Cochem Darmstadt Garmisch AST Geilenkirchen Grafenwoehr Hanau Heidelberg Hohenfels Illesheim Kaiserslautern Kalkar Mannheim Munich Ramstein AB Rhein-Main Air Base

I 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 106 100 (65) 100 (65) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (0) 116 100 (0) 100

II 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0) 114 110 (69) 110 (69) 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (0) 124 110 (0) 110

III-IV 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0) 122 115 (74) 115 (74) 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (0) 133 115 (0) 115

V 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0) 148 140 (90) 140 (90) 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (0) 161 140 (0) 140

I 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0) 171 161 (104) 161 (104) 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (0) 186 161 (0) 161

II 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0) 183 177 (112) 177 (112) 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (0) 199 177 (0) 177

III-IV 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0) 196 185 (120) 185 (120) 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (0) 213 185 (0) 185

V 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0) 238 225 (146) 225 (146) 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (0) 259 225 (0) 225

112

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Europe Germany Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Schweinfurt Spangdahlem Air Base Stuttgart Vilseck Wiesbaden / Mainz / Dexheim Wuerzburg / Kitzingen / Giebelstadt

I 100 (0) 100 (65) 106 100 (0) 100 (0)

II 110 (0) 110 (69) 114 110 (0) 110 (0)

III-IV 115 (0) 115 (74) 122 115 (0) 115 (0)

V 140 (0) 140 (90) 148 140 (0) 140 (0)

I 161 (0) 161 (104) 171 161 (0) 161 (0)

II 177 (0) 177 (112) 183 177 (0) 177 (0)

III-IV 185 (0) 185 (120) 196 185 (0) 185 (0)

V 225 (0) 225 (146) 238 225 (0) 225 (0)

106 108 100 (0) 101 136 172 100 (94) 130 100 (0) 100 (94)

114 116 110 (0) 110 145 184 110 (101) 139 110 (0) 110 (101)

122 124 115 (0) 116 156 197 115 (108) 149 115 (0) 115 (108)

148 151 140 (0) 141 189 240 140 (132) 181 140 (0) 140 (132)

171 175 161 (0) 163 218 277 161 (152) 209 161 (0) 161 (152)

183 187 177 (0) 177 234 297 177 (163) 224 177 (0) 177 (163)

196 200 185 (0) 187 250 318 185 (174) 239 185 (0) 185 (174)

238 243 225 (0) 228 304 386 225 (212) 291 225 (0) 225 (212)

Greece

Athens Larissa NAS Souda Bay / Mouzouras Keflavik - NSA Thorshofn Aviano AB Brindisi / San Vito Camp Darby Livorno Gaeta - NSA

Iceland Italy

113

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Europe Italy Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Ghedi NSA La Maddalena NSA Naples Niscemi NAS Sigonella Vicenza

I 100 (0) 100 (94) 100 (94) 106 106 100 (94) 100 (0) 100 (0) 100 (83) 157 100 (0) 141 100 (0) 106 117 100

II 110 (0) 110 (101) 110 (101) 114 114 110 (101) 110 (0) 110 (0) 110 (88) 168 110 (0) 152 110 (0) 114 125 110

III-IV 115 (0) 115 (108) 115 (108) 122 122 115 (108) 115 (0) 115 (0) 115 (95) 180 115 (0) 162 115 (0) 122 134 115

V 140 (0) 140 (132) 140 (132) 148 148 140 (132) 140 (0) 140 (0) 140 (115) 219 140 (0) 197 140 (0) 148 163 140

I 161 (0) 161 (152) 161 (152) 171 171 161 (152) 161 (0) 161 (0) 161 (133) 252 161 (0) 228 161 (0) 171 188 161

II 177 (0) 177 (163) 177 (163) 183 183 177 (163) 177 (0) 177 (0) 177 (142) 270 177 (0) 244 177 (0) 183 201 177

III-IV 185 (0) 185 (174) 185 (174) 196 196 185 (174) 185 (0) 185 (0) 185 (152) 289 185 (0) 261 185 (0) 196 215 185

V 225 (0) 225 (212) 225 (212) 238 238 225 (212) 225 (0) 225 (0) 225 (185) 352 225 (0) 318 225 (0) 238 262 225

Netherlands

Volkel Air Base AF North Brunssum Schinnen

Northern Ireland Norway Portugal

Londonderry Stavanger Azores / Lajes Field Southlant / Oeiras

Scotland

Aberdeen Edinburgh Edzell

114

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Europe Scotland Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Glasgow Prestwick Stornoway Thurso

I 117 118 141 124 100 (98) 100 (0) 106 138 100 (0) 138 136 126 100 (95) 100 (99) 133 100 (95)

II 125 126 152 133 110 (105) 110 (0) 114 148 110 (0) 148 145 135 110 (102) 110 (106) 143 110 (102)

III-IV 134 135 162 142 115 (112) 115 (0) 122 158 115 (0) 158 156 145 115 (110) 115 (114) 153 115 (110)

V 163 164 197 173 140 (136) 140 (0) 148 192 140 (0) 192 189 176 140 (133) 140 (138) 186 140 (133)

I 188 190 228 199 161 (157) 161 (0) 171 222 161 (0) 222 218 203 161 (154) 161 (159) 214 161 (154)

II 201 203 244 214 177 (169) 177 (0) 183 238 177 (0) 238 234 218 177 (165) 177 (171) 230 177 (165)

III-IV 215 218 261 229 185 (181) 185 (0) 196 255 185 (0) 255 250 233 185 (176) 185 (183) 246 185 (176)

V 262 265 318 278 225 (220) 225 (0) 238 310 225 (0) 310 304 283 225 (214) 225 (222) 299 225 (214)

Spain

Madrid / JHQ SW Moron AB NS Rota San Pablo HRF Valencia

Europe North America

Spain Canada

Zaragoza Argentia NAS, Newfoundland Churchill, Manitoba Cold Lake, Alberta Edmonton, Alberta E. Harmon AFB, Newfoundland Fort William, Ontario

115

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
North America Canada Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Frobisher, NWT Goose Airport, Newfoundland Ottawa, Ontario St. Johns, Newfoundland Toronto, Ontario Winnipeg, Manitoba

I 126 105 106 134 106 100 (97) 164 196 141 159 100 (79)

II 135 112 114 144 114 110 (104) 176 210 152 171 110 (85) 187 187 203

III-IV 145 120 122 154 122 115 (111) 188 224 162 183 115 (91) 200 200 218

V 176 146 148 187 148 140 (135) 229 273 197 222 140 (110) 243 243 265

I 203 169 171 216 171 161 (156) 264 315 228 256 161 (127) 281 281 305

II 218 181 183 232 183 177 (167) 283 338 244 275 177 (136) 301 301 327

III-IV 233 194 196 248 196 185 (178) 303 361 261 294 185 (146) 322 322 350

V 283 236 238 302 238 225 (217) 368 439 318 357 225 (177) 392 392 426

Greenland

Narsarssuak AB Simiutak AB Sondrestrom AB Thule AB

Atlantic Ocean Caribbean Sea

Ascension Island The Bahamas Eleuthera Island Grand Bahama Island Grand Turk Island

174 174 190

116

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Caribbean Sea The Bahamas Cuba Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Great Exuma Island NS Guantanamo Bay Port of Spain NSF Diego Garcia

I 174 124 100 (70) 124

II 187 133 110 (75) 133

III-IV 200 142 115 (80) 142

V 243 173 140 (97) 173

I 281 199 161 (112) 199

II 301 214 177 (120) 214

III-IV 322 229 185 (128) 229

V 392 278 225 (156) 278

Trinidad Island Indian Ocean British Indian Ocean Territory Australia

Pacific Ocean

H.E. Holt / N.W. Cape Woomera

153 100 (94) 112 130 112 177

164 110 (101) 120 139 120 190 133 139 120

176 115 (108) 128 149 128 203 142 149 128

214 140 (132) 156 181 156 247 173 181 156

247 161 (152) 180 209 180 285 199 209 180

264 177 (163) 193 224 193 305 214 224 193

283 185 (174) 207 239 207 326 229 239 207

344 225 (212) 251 291 251 397 278 291 251

Caroline Islands Johnston Atoll Marcus Island Marshall Islands Midway Island

Koror, Paulau Islands Ponape

Kwajalein Wake Island

124 130 112

117

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-1

Continent / Region Country
Pacific Ocean Philipine Is. Wind Speed (mph) - Note (a) Risk Category Wind Speed (km/h) - Note (a) Risk Category

Base / City
Clark AFB Sangley Point Subic Bay

I 106 106 106 177

II 114 114 114 190

III-IV 122 122 122 203

V 148 148 148 247

I 171 171 171 285

II 183 183 183 305

III-IV 196 196 196 326

V 238 238 238 397

Samoa

Apia / Upolu

Notes to Table F-1, WIND LOADING DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS Note (a) Use a minimum wind speed of 100 mph (161 km/h) for Risk Category I, 110 mph (177 km/h) for Risk Category II, 115 mph (185 km/h) for Risk Category III and IV or 140 mph (225 km/h) for Risk Category V for all locations unless a lower wind speed is approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Wind speeds shown in parenthesis are local data that are less than the minimum wind speed and may only be used if approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Where there is a zero in the parenthesis, no local data is currently available.

118

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-2 SNOW LOADING AND FROST PENETRATION DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Africa
Djibouti Egypt Morocco

Ground Snow

Frost Penetration (a)

Ground Snow

Frost Penetration (a)

Base / City
Djibouti Alexandria Casablanca Kabul NSA Bahrain Bombay Calcutta Madras New Delhi

(psf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(in) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(kPa) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(mm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Asia

Afghanistan Bahrain India

Iraq

Baghdad Basra NAF Atsugi MCAS Iwakuni Iwo Jima Misawa AFB Okinawa (All installations) Sagamihara

Japan

21 12 0 58 0 21

6 10 0 30 0 6

1 0.57 0 2.78 0 1

152 254 0 762 0 152

119

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Asia
Japan

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
Sasebo Tokyo COMFLTACT Yokosuka Yokota AFB, Honshu Camp Zama

(psf) 12 15 12 21 21 0

(in) 6 6 6 6 6 0

(kPa) 0.57 0.71 0.57 1 1.00 0

(mm) 152 152 152 161 152 0

Kuwait Oman

Kuwait City Areas south and west of Jabal Akehadar - Ibri - Nazwa Batinah Coast - Ash Shinash - Sib - Suhar Central, Southern, and Coastal Areas Sur to Sarfait - Barik - Dawqa - Hayma

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

120

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Asia
Oman

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
- Salalah - Shalim High Jabal Locations - Miskin - Sumail - Rikshah - Shaww Kuria Muria Island Masirah Island Mussandam Island

(psf) 0 0

(in) 0 0

(kPa) 0 0

(mm) 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pakistan Qatar Saudi Arabia

Peshawar Doha Dhahran Hafr al Batin Khamis Mushayt Jeddah Jubail Qadimah Riyadh Tabuk

121

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Asia
South Korea

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
Camp Casey Camp Hialeah, Pusan Camp Humphreys / Pyongtaek Chinhae Kimpo AFB Kunsan / Kunsan City Osan AFB / Songtan Pohang Seoul Taegu Uijongbu Yongsan

(psf) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(in) 48 24 45 24 48 30 45 24 48 40 48 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(kPa) 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(mm) 1219 610 1143 610 1219 762 1143 610 1219 1016 1219 1143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Vietnam

Da Nang Ho Chi Minh City Nha Trang

Taiwan

Tainan Taipei Tsoying

Thailand

Bangkok

122

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Asia
Thailand

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
Chiang Mai Sattahip Udonthani

(psf) 0 0 0 20 0

(in) 0 0 0 24 5

(kPa) 0 0 0 0.96 0

(mm) 0 0 0 610 127

Turkey

Ankara Incirlik AB / Adana Izmir AS Karamursel

15 0

12 0

0.72 0

305 0

Central America Europe

Canal Zone Belgium

Brussels Kester Kleine Brogel Shape Chievres

Bosnia Herzegovina England

Tulza AFB RAF Alconbury, Molesworth / Huntingdon Birmingham RAF Croughton / Brackley RAF Fairford

15 15

12 15

0.72 0.72

305 381

123

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Europe
England

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
RAF Lakenheath / Lakeheath Village USNA UK / London RAF Menwith Hill / Harrogate RAF Mildenhall Plymouth RAF Upwood / Ramsey JMF St. Mawgan / Cornwall Sculthorpe AB Southport South Shields Spurn Head

(psf) 15

(in) 15

(kPa) 0.72

(mm) 381

15

12

0.72

305

15 10

12 12

0.72 0.48

305 305

15 10 15 15

12 12 12 12

0.72 0.48 0.72 0.72

305 305 305 305

Germany

Ansbach Bamberg Baumholder Bremen

25

30

1.2

762

124

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Europe
Germany

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
Buechel Air Base / Cochem Darmstadt Garmisch AST Geilenkirchen Grafenwoehr Hanau Heidelberg Hohenfels Illesheim Kaiserslautern Kalkar Mannheim Munich Ramstein AB Rhein-Main Air Base Schweinfurt Spangdahlem Air Base Stuttgart Vilseck

(psf)

(in)

(kPa)

(mm)

25 25 25

0 25 30

1.2 1.2 1.2

0 635 762

40

36

1.92

914

25

30

1.2

762

25 45

30 36

1.2 2.16

762 914

125

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Europe
Germany

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
Wiesbaden / Mainz / Dexheim Wuerzburg / Kitzingen / Giebelstadt

(psf)

(in)

(kPa)

(mm)

25 5

35 0

1.2 0.24

889 0

Greece

Athens Larissa NAS Soudi Bay / Mouzouras Keflavik NSA Thorshofn Aviano AB Brindisi / San Vito Camp Darby Livorno Gaeta - NSA Ghedi NSA La Maddalena NSA Naples Niscemi NAS Sigonella

5 30 30 35 5

0 24 36 18 6

0.24 1.44 1.44 1.68 0.24

0 610 914 457 152

Iceland Iceland Italy

20

0.96

20 20 20 20

5 5 5 5

0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96

127 127 127 127

126

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Europe
Italy Netherlands

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
Vicenza Volkel Air Base AF North Brunssum Schinnen

(psf) 35

(in) 25

(kPa) 1.68

(mm) 635

15 15

20 12

0.72 0.72

508 305

Northern Ireland Norway Portugal

Londonderry Stavanger Azores / Lajes Field Southlant / Oeiras

Scotland

Aberdeen Edinburgh Edzell Glasgow Prestwick Stornoway Thurso

15 15 15 15 15 15 15 10

12 12 12 12 12 12 12 6

0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.48

305 305 305 305 305 305 305 152

Spain

Madrid / JHQ SW Moron AB NS Rota San Pablo

5 5

5 6

0.24 0.24

127 152

127

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Europe North America
Spain

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
HRF Valencia Zaragoza

(psf) 10 47 66 41 27 86 73 50 100 60 72 40 45

(in) 6 36 permafrost 72 60 60 60 permafrost 60 48 36 36 60

(kPa) 0.48 2.25 3.16 1.96 1.29 4.12 3.5 2.4 4.79 2.87 3.45 1.92 2.16

(mm) 152 914 permafrost 1829 1524 1524 1524 permafrost 1524 1219 914 914 1524

Canada

Argentia NAS, Newfoundland Churchill, Manitoba Cold Lake, Alberta Edmonton, Alberta E. Harmon AFB, Newfoundland Fort William, Ontario Frobisher, NWT Goose Airport, Newfoundland Ottawa, Ontario St. Johns, Newfoundland Toronto, Ontario Winnipeg, Manitoba

128

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
North America
Greenland

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
Narsarssuak AB Simiutak AB Sondrestrom AB Thule AB

(psf) 30 25 20 25 0

(in) 60 60 permafrost permafrost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(kPa) 1.44 1.2 0.96 1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(mm) 1524 1524 permafrost permafrost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atlantic Ocean Caribbean Sea

Ascension Island The Bahamas

Eleuthera Island Grand Bahama Island Grand Turk Island Great Exuma Island

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Caribbean Sea

The Bahamas

Cuba

NS Guantanamo Bay Port of Spain NSF Diego Garcia H.E. Holt / N.W. Cape Darwin

Trinidad Island

Indian Ocean Pacific Ocean

British Indian Ocean Territory Australia

129

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

Frost Penetration (a) Frost Penetration (a)

TABLE F-2
Continent / Region Country
Pacific Ocean
Australia Caroline Islands

Ground Snow

Ground Snow

Base / City
Woomera Koror, Paulau Islands Ponape

(psf) 0 0 0 0 0

(in) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(kPa) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(mm) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnston Atoll Marcus Island Marshall Islands

Kwajalein Wake Island

0 0 0

Midway Island Philipine Is.

Clark AFB Sangley Point Subic Bay

0 0 0 0

Samoa

Apia / Upolu

Notes to TABLE F-2, SNOW LOADING AND FROST PENETRATION DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS (a) See best practice B-2.3 for footing depths considering frost.

130

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 TABLE F-3 - EARTHQUAKE LOADING DATA OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS Table F-3
PGA Country
Algeria Angola Benin Botswana Burkino Faso Burundi Cameroon Central African Republic Chad Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 101 63 6 11 3 46 69 17 27 27 6 10 78 10 39 4 S1 (%g) 48 30 3 5 1 22 33 8 13 13 3 5 37 2 19 2 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 53 33 3 6 1 24 36 9 14 14 3 6 41 4 21 2 S1,10/50 (%g) 25 16 1 3 1 11 17 4 7 7 1 3 19 1 10 1 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Africa

Base / City
Algiers Oran Luanda Cotonou Gaborone Ougadougou Bujumbura Douala Yaounde Bangui

(%g) 38 24 2 4 1 18 26 6 10 10

N'Djamena Brazzaville Bukavu

2 4 30

Kinshasa Lubumbashi Cote d'Ivoire Abidjan

5 15 1

131

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Djibouti Egypt

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 102 24 71 68 17 45 58 27 10 37 38 1 32 7 22 60 19 49 28 51 10 S1 (%g) 41 12 33 32 8 21 27 13 5 18 18 0.5 15 3 11 28 9 23 13 24 2 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 48 12 37 36 9 24 30 14 6 20 20 1 17 3 12 31 10 25 15 27 4 S1,10/50 (%g) 21 7 17 17 4 11 14 7 3 9 9 0.3 8 2 6 15 5 12 7 13 1 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Africa

Base / City
Djibouti Alexandria Cairo Port Said

(%g) 39 9 27 26 6 17 22 10 4 14 14 0.4 12 3 9 23 7 19 11 19 5

Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea GuineaBissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Libya Madagascar Malawi

Malabo Asmara Addis Ababa Libreville Banjul Accra Conakry Bissau Nairobi Maseru Monrovia Tripoli Antananarivo Blantyre Lilongwe Zomba

Mali

Bamako

132

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Mauritania Morocco

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 8 26 28 27 47 11 0.2 6 0.3 29 8 37 10 27 30 3 7 3 19 18 S1 (%g) 4 12 13 13 22 5 0.1 3 0.1 14 4 17 5 13 14 1 3 1 9 8 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 4 14 15 14 24 6 0.1 3 0.1 15 4 19 6 14 16 2 4 2 10 9 S1,10/50 (%g) 2 7 7 7 12 3 0.1 1 0.1 7 2 9 3 7 7 1 2 1 5 4 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Africa

Base / City
Nouakchott Casablanca Kenitra Rabat Tangier

(%g) 3 10 11 10 18 4 0.1 2 0.1 11 3 14 4 10 11 1 3 1 7 7

Mozambique Niger Nigeria

Maputo Niamey Ibadan Kaduna Lagos

Rwanda Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia South Africa

Kigali Dakar Freetown Mogadishu Cape Town Durban Johannesburg Natal Pretoria

Swaziland Tanzania

Mbabane Dar es Salaam

133

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Tanzania Togo Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Asia Afghanistan

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 12 39 95 46 23 6 146 63 62 106 111 32 16 78 100 79 28 32 73 39 211 81 S1 (%g) 6 19 45 22 11 3 84 30 32 39 58 19 11 27 47 45 13 15 34 18 100 38 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 6 21 50 24 12 3 73 35 16 59 61 18 9 41 57 41 15 17 38 20 111 42 S1,10/50 (%g) 3 10 24 11 6 1 35 17 5 21 28 10 5 15 26 20 7 8 18 10 52 20 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Africa

Base / City
Zanzibar Lome Tunis Kampala Lusaka Harare Bagram Gardeyz Herat Jalalabad Kabul Kandahar Lashkar Gah Mazar-e Sharif Pol-e Charkhi Qalat

(%g) 5 15 36 18 9 2 66 26 26 45 48 13 7 33 42 35 11 12 28 15 80 31

Bahrain Bangladesh Brunei Burma

Manama NSA Bahrain Dhaka Bandar Seri Begawan Mandalay Rangoon

134

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
China

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 59 46 9 14 13 25 33 18 93 76 8 13 27 52 15 74 172 145 117 101 95 182 S1 (%g) 28 22 4 7 6 12 16 9 44 36 4 6 12 25 7 35 82 68 55 48 45 86 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 31 24 5 7 7 13 17 10 49 40 4 7 14 28 8 39 90 76 61 53 50 95 S1,10/50 (%g) 15 11 2 4 3 6 8 5 23 19 2 3 7 13 4 18 43 36 29 25 24 45 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Asia

Base / City
Beijing (Peking) Chengdu Chongqing Guangzhou (Canton) Harbin Nanjing Qingdao (Tsingtao) Shanghai Shenyang Tianjin (Tientsan) Wuhan

(%g) 22 18 3 5 5 9 13 7 35 29 3 5 10 20 6 28 66 55 45 39 36 69

Hong Kong India

Hong Kong Bombay Calcutta Madras New Delhi

Indonesia

Bandung Jakarta Medan Surabaya

Iran

Isfahan Shiraz

135

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Iran Iraq

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 190 215 130 103 173 144 112 100 196 71 77 99 94 199 130 173 187 196 105 95 196 S1 (%g) 90 102 70 49 93 68 53 47 93 33 36 47 45 94 69 93 88 93 50 45 93 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 100 113 68 54 91 75 59 52 103 37 40 52 50 104 68 91 98 103 55 50 103 S1,10/50 (%g) 47 53 38 26 49 36 28 25 49 18 19 25 23 49 36 49 46 49 26 23 48 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Asia

Base / City
Tabriz Tehran Baghdad Basra Kirkuk

(%g) 72 82 50 39 66 55 43 38 75 27 29 38 36 76 50 66 71 75 40 36 75

Israel

Haifa Jerusalem Tel Aviv

Japan

NAF Atsugi Fukuoka Itazuke AFB MCAS Iwakuni Iwo Jima Kobe Misawa AFB Okinawa (All installations) Osaka Sagamihara Sapporo Sasebo Tokyo

136

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Japan

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 196 196 210 196 74 25 57 57 157 59 258 S1 (%g) 93 93 99 93 35 12 27 27 74 28 122 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 103 103 110 103 39 13 30 30 82 31 135 S1,10/50 (%g) 49 49 52 49 18 6 14 14 39 15 64 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Asia

Base / City
COMFLTACT Yokosuka Yokohama Yokota AFB, Honshu Camp Zama

(%g) 75 75 80 75 28 10 22 22 60 22 98

Jordan Kuwait Laos Lebanon Malaysia Nepal Oman

Amman Ali Al Salem Kuwait City Vientiane Beirut Kuala Lumpur Kathmandu Areas south and west of Jabal Akehadar - Ibri - Nazwa Batinah Coast - Ash Shinash - Sib - Suhar

36 35 66 52 60

96 92 174 136 157

45 44 82 64 74

51 48 91 72 83

23 23 43 34 39

137

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Oman

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) S1 (%g) SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) S1,10/50 (%g) SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Asia

Base / City
Central, Southern, and Coastal Areas Sur to Sarfait - Barik - Dawqa - Hayma - Salalah - Shalim High Jabal Locations - Miskin - Sumail - Rikshah - Shaww Kuria Muria Island Masirah Island Muscat Mussandam Island Madah

(%g)

1 3

4 8

1 4

2 4

1 3

43 43 39 40

113 112 103 104

53 53 49 50

59 59 54 55

27 28 26 26

8 49 90 76 52 29 47

20 130 235 199 135 77 123

10 61 112 94 64 36 58

10 68 123 105 71 40 64

5 32 59 49 34 19 30

Pakistan

Islamabad Karachi Lahore

138

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Pakistan Qatar Saudi Arabia

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 110 6 10 16 51 37 6 25 6 29 39 3 16 31 20 18 19 16 18 14 S1 (%g) 52 7 5 7 25 17 2 12 7 14 19 1 7 15 9 9 9 7 9 6 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 58 3 6 8 26 20 3 13 3 15 21 1 8 17 10 9 10 9 9 7 S1,10/50 (%g) 27 4 3 4 13 9 1 7 4 8 10 1 4 8 5 4 5 4 4 3 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Asia

Base / City
Peshawar Doha Dhahran Hafr al Batin Jeddah Jubail Khamis Mushayt Qadimah Riyadh Tabuk

(%g) 42 2 4 6 20 14 2 10 2 11 15 1 6 12 8 7 7 6 7 5

Singapore Sir Lanka South Korea

All Colombo Camp Casey Camp Hialeah, Busan Camp Humphreys / Pyongtaek Chinhae Kimhae Kimpo AFB Kunsan / Kunsan City Kwangju

139

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
South Korea

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 20 15 18 30 18 18 68 83 288 263 251 341 263 29 29 22 31 25 25 104 110 153 S1 (%g) 9 7 9 14 9 9 32 39 136 124 119 161 124 14 13 11 15 12 12 50 52 72 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 10 8 9 15 9 10 35 43 151 138 132 178 138 15 15 12 16 13 13 54 57 80 S1,10/50 (%g) 5 4 4 8 4 4 17 21 71 65 62 85 65 8 7 5 8 7 6 26 27 38 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Asia

Base / City
Osan AFB / Songtan Pohang Seoul Taegu Uijongbu Yongsan / Seoul

(%g) 8 6 7 12 7 7 26 32 110 100 96 130 100 11 11 8 12 10 10 40 42 58

Syria Taiwan

Aleppo Damascus Changhua Kao-hsiung Tainan Taipei Tsoying

Thailand

Bangkok Chiang Mai Sattahip Songkhla Udonthani Udorn

Turkey

Ankara Incirlik AB / Adana Istanbul

140

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Turkey United Arab Emirates Vietnam

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 254 146 112 177 19 15 13 38 36 56 97 294 179 177 105 117 44 52 21 34 38 S1 (%g) 120 69 53 84 9 7 7 18 17 27 46 139 85 83 50 55 21 24 10 16 17 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 133 77 59 93 10 8 7 20 19 29 51 154 94 93 55 61 23 27 11 18 20 S1,10/50 (%g) 62 36 28 44 5 4 4 9 9 14 25 73 44 44 26 29 11 13 5 8 9 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Asia

Base / City
Izmir AS Karamursel Abu Dhabi Dubai Da Nang Ho Chi Minh City Nha Trang

(%g) 97 56 43 67 7 6 5 15 14 21 37

Yemen Central America Belize Canal Zone Costa Rica El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Europe Albania Austria Belgium

Aden City Sanaa Belmopan

San Jose San Salvador Guatemala Tegucigalpa Tirana Salzburg Vienna Antwerp Brussels Kester

112 68 67 40 45 17 20 8 13 14

141

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Belgium Bosnia Herzegovina Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark England

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 33 57 97 122 124 13 12 19 23 29 17 16 24 13 22 16 21 S1 (%g) 16 27 46 58 59 6 6 9 11 14 7 7 11 4 11 7 10 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 18 30 51 64 65 7 6 10 12 15 9 9 13 7 12 9 11 S1,10/50 (%g) 8 14 23 30 31 3 3 5 5 8 4 4 6 1 5 4 5 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Europe

Base / City
Kleine Brogel Shape - Chievres Tuzla AFB Sofia Nicosia Prague Copenhagen RAF Alconbury, Molesworth / Huntingdon Birmingham RAF Croughton / Brackley RAF Fairford RAF Lakenheath / Lakeheath Village Liverpool USNA UK / London RAF Menwith Hill / Harrogate RAF Mildenhall Plymouth

(%g) 12 22 37 47 47 5 5 7 9 11 6 6 9 5 8 6 8

142

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
England

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 17 21 17 24 12 17 5 17 38 30 47 43 45 25 36 22 26 5 44 10 34 S1 (%g) 7 5 7 12 6 7 2 8 18 14 22 20 21 12 17 10 12 2 21 5 16 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 9 11 9 13 7 9 3 9 20 16 24 23 23 13 19 11 14 3 23 6 18 S1,10/50 (%g) 4 3 4 7 3 4 1 4 9 7 12 11 11 7 9 5 7 1 11 3 9 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Europe

Base / City
RAF Upwood / Ramsey JMF St. Mawgan / Cornwall Sculthorpe AB Southport South Shields Spurn Head

(%g) 6 8 6 9 4 6 2 7 14 11 18 17 17 10 14 8 10 2 17 4 13

Finland France

Helsinki Bordeaux Istres AFB Lyon Marseille Nice Strasbourg

Germany

Ansbach Babenhausen Bamberg Baumholder Berlin Bonn Bremen Buechel Air Base / Cochem

143

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Germany

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 42 32 40 48 58 23 25 10 40 40 27 24 26 23 22 25 42 27 25 41 22 S1 (%g) 20 15 19 22 27 11 12 5 19 19 12 12 12 11 11 12 20 12 12 20 10 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 22 17 21 25 30 12 13 5 21 21 14 12 14 12 12 13 22 14 13 22 11 S1,10/50 (%g) 10 8 10 12 14 6 7 2 10 10 7 7 7 5 5 6 10 7 7 10 5 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Europe

Base / City
Darmstadt Dusseldorf Frankfurt am Main Garmisch AST Geilenkirchen Giebelstadt Grafenwoehr Hamburg Hanau Heidelberg Hohenfels Illesheim Kaiserslautern Kalkar Kitzingen Landstuhl Mannheim Munich Ramstein AB Rhein-Main Air Base Schweinfurt

(%g) 16 12 15 18 22 9 10 4 15 15 10 9 10 9 8 9 16 10 10 16 8

144

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Germany

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 25 46 41 23 40 22 85 114 147 91 144 126 149 49 60 105 96 51 125 S1 (%g) 12 22 19 11 19 11 40 54 32 43 68 42 70 23 29 50 46 24 50 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 13 24 21 12 21 12 44 60 77 48 75 66 78 25 31 55 50 26 67 S1,10/50 (%g) 7 12 10 5 10 5 21 28 17 22 36 22 37 12 15 26 24 13 23 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Europe

Base / City
Spangdahlem Air Base Stuttgart Vaihingen an der Enz Vilseck Wiesbaden / Mainz / Dexheim Wuerzburg / Kitzingen / Giebelstadt

(%g) 10 18 15 9 15 8 32 43 56 35 55 48 57 19 23 40 37 20 46

Greece

Athens Kavalla Larissa Nea Makri Rhodes NAS Souda Bay / Mouzouras Thessaloniki

Hungary Iceland

Budapest Taszar AB Keflavik - NSA Reykjavik Thorshofn

Italy

Aviano AB

145

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Italy

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 21 58 62 39 35 75 24 27 79 82 84 52 29 139 55 28 76 22 30 14 58 S1 (%g) 13 15 20 25 11 19 12 7 32 51 26 19 16 92 20 5 21 11 14 6 27 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 13 34 36 24 20 41 13 16 45 37 46 32 17 64 32 17 43 12 16 7 31 S1,10/50 (%g) 7 8 11 14 5 10 7 4 18 18 14 10 9 31 11 2 11 6 7 3 14 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Europe

Base / City
Brindisi / San Vito Camp Darby Livorno Florence Gaeta - NSA Genoa Ghedi NSA La Maddalena Milan NSA Naples Niscemi Palermo Rome Siculiana NAS Sigonella Trieste Turin Vicenza

(%g) 7 21 22 11 12 27 9 8 28 29 30 16 9 55 19 8 27 9 11 5 22

Luxembourg Malta Netherlands

Luxembourg Valletta Amsterdam AF North Brunssum

146

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Netherlands Northern Ireland Norway Poland

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 6 31 9 8 16 34 20 6 12 11 173 71 68 64 10 110 7 7 10 18 S1 (%g) 7 15 4 4 7 16 9 3 6 5 93 34 32 31 5 52 3 3 5 9 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 3 17 5 4 8 18 10 3 6 6 91 37 35 34 5 58 4 4 6 9 S1,10/50 (%g) 4 8 2 3 4 8 5 1 3 3 49 18 17 16 2 27 2 2 3 4 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Europe

Base / City
Schinnen Volkel Air Base Belfast Londonderry Oslo Stavanger Krakow Poznan Waraszawa Warsaw

(%g) 2 12 3 3 6 13 8 2 5 4 66 27 26 24 4 42 3 3 4 7

Portugal

Azores / Lajes Field Lisbon Oporto Southlant / Oeiras Dublin Bucharest Moscow St. Petersburg (Leningrad)

Republic of Ireland Romania Russia

Scotland

Aberdeen Edinburgh

147

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Scotland

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 11 22 19 13 23 10 9 102 109 59 63 34 13 64 76 14 13 69 16 15 8 46 S1 (%g) 5 11 9 6 11 5 4 48 52 28 30 16 7 30 35 6 6 33 7 7 4 22 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 6 12 10 7 12 6 4 53 57 31 33 18 7 34 40 7 7 36 9 8 4 24 S1,10/50 (%g) 3 5 5 3 6 3 3 25 27 15 16 8 4 16 18 3 3 17 4 4 2 11 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Europe

Base / City
Edzell Glasgow Hamilton Prestwick Renfrew Stornoway Thurso

(%g) 4 8 7 5 9 4 4 39 42 22 24 13 5 24 29 5 5 26 6 6 3 18

Serbia and Montenegro Slovakia Spain

Belgrade Zagrebac Bratislava Barcelona Bilbao Madrid / JHQ SW Moron AB NS Rota San Pablo Sevilleja de la Jara HRF Valencia Zaragoza

Sweden Switzerland

Goteborg Stockholm Bern

148

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Switzerland Ukraine North America Canada

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 49 41 7 14 12 8 8 8 10 8 8 11 19 58 57 14 18 101 S1 (%g) 23 19 3 5 3 2 2 2 5 2 2 4 6 11 11 5 5 31 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 25 21 4 7 6 3 3 3 4 3 3 5 9 22 22 7 8 46 S1,10/50 (%g) 12 10 2 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 16 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Europe

Base / City
Geneva Zurich Kiev Argentia NAS, Newfoundland Calgary Churchill, Manitoba Cold Lake, Alberta Edmonton, Alberta E. Harmon AFB, Newfoundland Fort William, Ontario Frobisher, NWT Goose Airport, Newfoundland Halifax Montreal Ottawa, Ontario St. Johns, Newfoundland Toronto, Ontario Vancouver

(%g) 19 16 3 6 9 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 9 33 32 6 12 49

149

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Canada Greenland

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 8 33 33 23 39 19 154 49 2 102 4 60 23 16 97 38 51 1 1 1 21 S1 (%g) 2 17 17 11 18 9 73 23 1 48 2 28 11 7 46 8 20 0.3 0.3 0.3 7 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 3 18 18 12 20 10 81 25 1 54 2 31 12 8 51 15 26 1 1 1 5 S1,10/50 (%g) 1 9 9 5 9 5 38 12 1 25 1 15 6 4 24 4 11 0.3 0.3 0.3 1 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
North America

Base / City
Winnipeg, Manitoba Narsarssuak AB Simiutak AB Sondrestrom AB Thule AB

(%g) 4 12 12 9 15 7 59 19 1 39 1 23 9 6 37 21 24 1 1 1 8

Mexico

Ciudad Juarez Guadalajara Hermosillo Matamoros Mazatlan Merida Mexico City Monterrey Nuevo Laredo Tijuana

South America

Argentina Bolivia Brazil

Buenos Aires La Paz Belem Belo Horizonte Brasilia Manaus

150

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Brazil

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 1 11 4 33 10 221 316 99 190 212 7 230 232 32 107 93 S1 (%g) 1 4 2 11 4 102 141 36 84 82 3 98 103 7 45 39 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 1 4 1 1 3 131 187 53 111 102 4 134 134 13 53 45 S1,10/50 (%g) 0.3 1 1 0.3 1 60 82 21 48 45 1 56 59 3 21 18 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
South America

Base / City
Porto Alegre Recife Rio de Janeiro Salvador Sao Paulo

(%g) 1 4 1 13 3 94 132 44 81 90 3 95 97 18 48 43

Chile Colombia Ecuador Paraguay Peru Uruguay Venezuela Atlantic Ocean Caribbean Sea Ascension Island Bahamas

Santiago Valparaiso Bogota Guayaquil Quito Asuncion Lima Piura Montevideo Caracas Maracaibo

Eleuthera Island Grand Bahama Island Grand Turk Island

1 1 23

2 2 61

1 1 29

1 1 32

1 1 16

151

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Bahamas

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 20 7 39 27 132 113 182 113 137 189 150 152 102 170 84 117 157 94 117 S1 (%g) 10 4 19 13 62 53 86 53 65 79 60 72 48 81 30 41 74 45 41 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 11 4 21 14 69 59 95 59 72 102 91 80 54 89 44 66 82 49 66 S1,10/50 (%g) 5 2 10 7 33 28 45 28 34 40 37 38 25 42 16 23 39 23 23 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Caribbean Sea

Base / City
Great Exuma Island Nassau Bridgetown Havana NS Guantanamo Bay

(%g) 8 3 15 10 50 43 69 43 52 75 58 58 39 65 32 43 60 36 43

Barbados Cuba

Dominica Dominican Republic Grenada Guadeloupe Haiti Jamaica Martinique Montserrat Saint Croix Saint John Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Thomas

Roseau Santo Domingo Saint George's Basse-Terre Port-au-Prince Cap-Haitien Kingston Fort-de-France Plymouth Frederiksted Bethany Basseterre Castries Charlotte Amalie

152

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Saint Vincent and The Grenadines Trinidad & Tobago

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 56 S1 (%g) 26 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 29 S1,10/50 (%g) 14 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Caribbean Sea

Base / City

(%g) 21

Port Elizabeth Scarborough Trinidad NS Port of Spain

45 66 68 37 28

117 174 180 99 73

55 82 84 36 35

61 91 95 54 39

29 43 44 20 18

Vieques Indian Ocean British Indian Ocean Territory Australia

Isabel Segunda NSF Diego Garcia

Pacific Ocean

Brisbane Canberra Darwin H.E. Holt / N.W. Cape Melbourne Perth Sydney Woomera

12 19 16 19 19 18 18 19 28 41

32 49 43 49 49 47 46 49 73 108

15 23 20 23 23 22 22 23 35 51

17 26 23 25 26 25 24 25 39 56

8 12 10 12 12 12 11 12 18 27

Caroline Islands

Koror, Paulau Islands Ponape

153

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Caroline Islands Fiji Johnston Atoll Marcus Island Marshall Islands Majuro Kwajalein Wake Island Midway Island New Zealand Papau New Guinea Philipine Is. Auckland Wellington Port Moresby Baguio Cebu Clark AFB Manila Sangley Point Subic Bay Saipan Capitol Hill

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 82 60 143 100 127 125 144 S1 (%g) 39 28 67 47 60 60 68 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 43 31 75 52 67 66 75 S1,10/50 (%g) 20 15 35 25 32 31 35 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Pacific Ocean

Base / City
Yap Suva

(%g) 31 23 54 38 49 48 55

23 72 31 66 46 64 77 78 71 58

56 172 82 172 120 167 203 204 186 178

27 82 39 81 57 79 96 97 88 45

33 101 43 90 63 87 106 107 97 92

16 48 20 43 30 42 50 51 46 23

154

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 Table F-3

PGA Country
Samoa Tinian

Seismic Data (Site Class B) SS (%g) 33 183 S1 (%g) 15 46 SS,5/50 (%g) S1,5/50 (%g) SS,10/50 (%g) 17 95 S1,10/50 (%g) 8 24 SS,20/50 (%g) S1,20/50 (%g)

Continent / Region
Pacific Ocean

Base / City
Apia / Upolu

(%g) 13 59

155

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013

This page intentionally left blank.

156

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 APPENDIX G SEISMIC SPECTRAL ACCELERATION MAPS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES, ITS TERRITORIES AND POSSESSIONS FIGURE G-1 - AFGHANISTAN RISK-TARGETED MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION OF 0.2-SECOND SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING), SITE CLASS B

157

UFC 3-301-01 1 June 2013 FIGURE G-2 - AFGHANISTAN RISK-TARGETED MAXIMUM CONSIDERED EARTHQUAKE HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION OF 1-SECOND SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION (5 PERCENT OF CRITICAL DAMPING), SITE CLASS B

158