Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
There is an innate paradox in the global conversation about poverty alleviation that
eludes even the most astute scholars. Governments and agencies in the midst of the
world economic meltdown, are reviewing their policies. As usual Africa is at the
receiving end hoping that these reviews does not affect aid ration. Unfortunately CIDA
and the Canadian government have decided. Contrary to many people advocating for a
big push, featuring an increase in foreign aid through which billions of dollars could be
transferred to the poor people in Africa, CIDA might have decided to stop chasing
poverty in Africa.
Their decision not to support poverty alleviation programmes in Africa comes not without
consequences. Obviously the tens of thousands of women and children have lost their
main source of livelihood-CIDA. The not too obvious outcome is the responses of many
young but curious Africans who have taken keen interest in this new development. I am
not an aid practitioner, neither have I worked with the IMF or the World Bank, I am a
very curious young African who have directly observed poverty. I am concerned about
the future of our continent in the face of withdrawal their aid.
Over the past month I have been reading about aid and development in attempt to
understand why CIDA made these decisions. Interestingly my readings have gone to
reinforce my position on foreign aid. I have always believed that the history of aid in
Africa is a history of unintended consequences. The question now is; can foreign aid
alleviate poverty in Africa? This answer is definitely not a “yes or no”. It will require a
methodical review of the history of aid in Africa
Is it poverty or aid?
A discussion of whether aid is effective or not is best begun by reviewing the history of
efforts to make aid more effective. The aid industry has for decades tried one thing after
another to make aid work better, and the underlying belief that the right formula is within
reach is one of the things that has kept it going.
Also in the 1980s they saw how critical women are to development and began to focus
more on Women In Development (WID), with legal rights programs, women’s health
(including birth control and breast feeding promotion), and “income-generating projects.”
As for the overarching paradigms that guided their work, by the 1970s they had begun
to give up on top-down approaches; bottom-up, grassroots approaches, emphasizing
participation, came into vogue. They still do much that is top-down, but it has been
refined as policy dialogue (echoing participatory approaches) while our grassroots work
now pays more attention to “social” issues including fostering, and building upon, “social
capital.” One of the big new ideas in the aid industry is “selectivity,” the notion that aid
should be allocated to countries that can do the most good with it because of sound
policies and institutions. (That such a self-evident notion comes along in the seventh
decade of the industry tells us something about its capacity for deep self-examination.)
At the field level, where most aid projects aimed at poverty reduction are undertaken,
one sees concretely how those guiding ideas are played out, and how it is possible to
keep believing that aid can be improved.
The estimated 157 million young people living in sub-Saharan Africa today are by no
means a homogenous group. They come from varied cultural and ethnic backgrounds,
and they speak one or more of the estimated 800 languages spoken in the region. Many
have qualifications that compare favorably with or exceed those of their colleagues in
more developed parts of the world; however, many more fall far below global education
averages. Youth in sub-Saharan Africa are adopting new techniques of learning,
working and communicating with the outside world in their attempts to create
meaningful lives for themselves. They are navigating the communications highway and
exchanging text messages and electronic mail with colleagues, gradually overcoming
social and cultural factors that previously limited their access to information.
Nevertheless, poverty remains a major constraint to the achievement of the full potential
of youth in the region.
The question for all of us to answer is the way forward; what can we all do to ensure
that youth all round the world have equal playing field, that they have the opportunity to
participate in the development of their future. Youth in Africa are the future of Africa; they
are the “CIDA” we all look up to. It would be very kind of you to send me your ideas