Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Keith Rice, Zhiming Gao, Bill Jackson Oak Ridge National Lab February 2006
Mark 7 Model Improvement and Testing Through ASHRAE 1173-TRP ORNL & Purdue Public Models
To Be Improved/Tested/Validated
Objective
Wide-Range Testing of Public AC Models
Mild to Extreme Ambients
Low to High Indoor Humidity
Evaporation HT Coefs for Three Refrigerants Smooth (Thome 2002) vs Microfin (Cavallini/ Del Col, 1999) Tubes 12 Heat Transfer Coefficient (kW/M 2K) 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Vapor Quality (%) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
R410A, microfin R22, microfin R407C, microfin R410A, smooth R22, smooth R407, smooth
T_dew = 10C Mass flux_sm = 280 kg/m2s Q_flux = 12kW/m2 Smooth tube diam. = 9.3 mm Fin tip diameter = 8.9 mm
Evaporation HT Multipliers, Microfin vs Smooth Tubes for Three Refrigerants Microfin (Cavallini/ Del Col, 1999) / Smooth (Thome 2002) 5.0 Microfin Heat Transfer Multiplier 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Vapor Quality
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
6
T_dew = 10C Mass flux_sm = 280 kg/m2s Q_flux = 12kW/m2 Smooth tube diam. = 9.3 mm Fin tip diameter = 8.9 mm Fin height = 0.2 mm Apex angle = 50 Spiral angle = 18 Groove number = 60
Condensation HT Coefs for Three Refrigerants, SmoothTubes (Hajal/Thome/Cavallini, 2003) vs Microfin (Cavallini/ Del Col, 1999) 16 Heat Transfer Coefficient (kW/M 2K) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Vapor Quality (%) 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
R410A, microfin R22, microfin R407C, microfin R410A, smooth R22, smooth R407C, smooth
T_dew = 40C Mass flux_sm = 404 kg/m2s Smooth tube diam. = 8 mm Fin tip diameter = 7.6 mm
4.5 R410A Condensation Heat Transfer Multiplier 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 Vapor Quality 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
T_dew = 40C Mass flux_sm = 404 kg/m2s Smooth tube diam. = 8 mm Fin tip diameter = 7.6 mm Fin height = 0.2 mm Apex angle = 50 Spiral angle = 18 Groove number = 60
T_dew = 10C Mass flux_sm = 280 kg/m2s Q_flux = 12kW/m2 DT = 1.59K Smooth tube diam. = 9.3 mm Fin tip diameter = 8.9 mm Fin height = 0.2 mm Apex angle = 50 Spiral angle = 18 Groove number = 60
Local Microfin Pressure Drop Multipliers -- Evaporation Kedzierski and Choi (2001)
1.8 1.7 Pressure Drop Multiplier 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Vapor Quality
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
10
T_dew = 10C Mass flux_sm = 280 kg/m2s Smooth tube diam. = 9.3 mm Fin tip diameter = 8.9 mm Fin height = 0.2 mm Apex angle = 50 Spiral angle = 18 Groove number = 60
Condenser Local Pressure Drop Predictions Kedzierski and Choi (2001) 8 Condensation Pressure Drop, DP/DL (kPa/m) 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Vapor Quality
T_dew = 40C Mass flux_sm = 404 kg/m2s Smooth tube diam. = 8 mm Fin tip diameter = 7.6 mm Fin height = 0.2 mm Apex angle = 50 Spiral angle = 18 Groove number = 60
Local Microfin Pressure Drop Multipliers -- Condensation Kedzierski and Choi (2001)
5.0 4.5 Pressure Drop Multiplier 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Vapor Quality
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
12
T_dew = 40C Mass flux_sm = 404 kg/m2s Smooth tube diam. = 8 mm Fin tip diameter = 7.6 mm Fin height = 0.2 mm Apex angle = 50 Spiral angle = 18 Groove number = 60
Summary
Constant Rifled Tube HT Multipliers used in Mark 6
Predict close to ave. evap. HT mult. for R22 & R410A Overpredict rifled tube evap. HT effects for R407C By > 20% Underpredict ave. cond. HT mult. for R22 & R410A New HT mult is >50% higher for R410A About 10% more for R22 Approx. predict the ave. cond. HT effects for R407C Underpredict rifled tube PD effects for all refrigs New cumulative PD multiplier effects are about 17% higher for evaporators about 43% higher for condensers
EER@95F
R-22
ZR34K3-PFV
R-407C
ZR34K3E-PFV
R-410A
ZR34K5-PFV
R-410A
ZR32K3-PFV
Compr. Inlet Sat. Temp T_e / T_c, F 45.1 / 116.2 48.4 / 121.8 47.1 / 114.6
HX Pressure Drop Ratio evap / cond 1.0 / 1.0 1.01 / 1.08 0.61 / 0.84
HX Heat Transfer Ratio (evap / cond) 1.0 / 1.0 0.90 / 0.90 1.23 / 1.22
R-22
ZR34K3-PFV
R-407C
ZR34K3E-PFV
R-410A
ZR32K3-PFV
Results
TRP-1173 Project Completed Successfully
Concluded that the Purdue and ORNL Models Perform near equally as well compared to R-410A and R-407C test data New charge calibration approach greatly improves off-design predictions for range of ambients and charges