Concept of Law has been said that it is a set of legal standards forming a closed system, to the point that

solutions must be sought in the standards, valid criterion for a long time and that, for the rest, there is some share of certainty that provides legal certainty to social relationships that develop in this place and time.

In principle, say that is a set of rules of a general nature, which are taught to govern on all of society or sectors pre-established by the needs of the social regulation, which are imposed on a compulsory on recipients, and whose failure must lead to a sanction or the State's response to such actions. These rules are not the result only rational elements, but in the formation of the same affect other elements, such as political interests and socio-economic, values and demands prevailing social, in both condition a particular political will and legal, who in both becomes dominant is invoked through the legal standards. In turn these standards express these values, concepts and demands, and contain the mechanisms to promote the realization of the same through the behaviors forbidden, permitted or required in different areas of social life.

The social diversity and areas in which methodological and legally can be grouped, is the result of the level of development not only of relations, but also of the rules and requirements of progress in the same, but even with this multiplicity of existing rules, the Law has to be considered as a whole, as a harmonious. That internal harmony can be produced by the existence of the political will and legal in them behind. In plural societies the harmony of the political will depend on the coincidence of interests of the groups political partisan predominant in the legislative and executive, as well as the continuity of the same time. Changes can also occur with the variations of the socioeconomic interests and political predominant, to vary the composition parliamentary or of the government. Also, in societies and one with budget of the unit on the basis of the heterogeneity existing social harmony of the legislation will be much more feasible while less democratic, which does not mean that achieved permanently; the basis of the harmony lies in the interests only of the party.

Doctrinally defends the existence of unity and consistency; but it is that in practice this is absolutely impossible in its formal aspect, even though the interests and values at stake, as the regulations are enacted in different historical moments, by State organs different, and even dominated by political majorities or with expressions of political wills very dissimilar. Also not there is always a pre prepared for action State rules (legislative programs), but the

enactment of a provision or another depends on the needs or impositions of the moment . In such situations are regulated social relations in a way, with some recognition of rights and imposition of duties, with certain restrictions, are established mandates of inescapable compliance; and these provisions can be challenged by other organs of the State, repealed by superiors, or modified by the same producers months or years later. That is, in the formal level, doing an analysis of the existence of a diversity of provisions, if we will find provisions governing in a different way certain institutions, or the prohibit, or the admit, or introduce changes in its regulation, or that also in the process to amend or repeal, occur gaps or gaps, i.e. areas or situations deregulation.

In the order factual, and using arguments of the political theory, the foundation for the harmony offers, certainly, the existence of a political will dominate, and certain and certain political interests at stake wishing to be prevail as already stated before. AND from the point of view legal-formal, the existence of a set of principles in the order technical and legal make some provisions be subordinated to other, that the production rules of a body prime on the other, that some subsequent can leave without force to earlier ones, as is the principles of hierarchy not by the range formal standard, but by the hierarchy of the organ of state apparatus that has been empowered to order or that has issued; of the prevalence of the special rule on the general; that would allow that may exist general laws and to his side specific laws for certain circumstances or institutions and to allow regulate of a differentiated manner, And even so both have legal value and binding force.; or the principle of repeal of the previous standard by the post, to cite some examples.