You are on page 1of 7

CHECKLIST 1 EVALUATION FOR JOURNAL REVIEW PRESENTATIONS

Name of the Trainee Name of the Faculty / Observer Title


Sl. No Items for Observation During Presentation 0 1 Article Chose was Poor Below Average 1 2 3 Average Good Very Good 4

Date

Extent understanding of scope & objective of paper by the candidate

Whether cross-reference have been consulted

Whether other relevant publication consulted

Ability to respond to questions on the paper / subject

Audio visual aids used

Ability to defend the paper

Clarity of presentations

Any other observations

Total Score

CHECKLIST 2 EVALUATION OF SEMINAR PRESENTATIONS


Name of the Trainee Name of the Faculty / Observer Title
Sl. No Items for Observation During Presentation 0 1 Whether other relevant publications consulted 2 Whether cross-references have been consulted 3 Completeness of preparations Poor Below Average 1 2 3 Average Good Very Good 4

Date

Clarity of presentations

Understanding of Subject

Ability to answer the questions

Time scheduling

Appropriate use of audio visual aids

Overall performance

10

Any other observations

Total Score

CHECKLIST 3 EVALUATION OF CLINICAL WORK IN OPD


Name of the Trainee Name of the Unit Head Title
Sl. No Items for Observation During Presentation 0 1 Regularity of Attendance Poor Below Average 1 2 3 Average Good Very Good 4

Date

Punctuality

Interaction with colleagues and supportive staff

Maintenance of case records

Presentations of cases

Investigation work etc

Chair-side manners

Report with patients

Overall quality of clinical works

Total Score

CHECKLIST 4 EVALUATION FROM CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATIONS


Name of the Trainee Name of the Faculty / Observer Title
Sl. No Items for Observation During Presentation 0 1 2 Completeness of History Whether all relevant points clicked 3 4 5 Clarity of Presentations Logical order Mentioned all positive & negative 6 Mentioned all positive & negative 7 Diagnosis, whether it follows logically from history & findings 8 Investigations required. Complete list relevant order Interpretations and investigations 9 Ability to react to questioning whether it follows logically from history & findings 10 11 Ability to defend diagnosis Ability to justify differential diagnosis 12 Others Poor Below Average 1 2 3 Average Good Very Good 4

Date

Total Score

CHECKLIST 5 EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL SKILLS


Name of the Trainee Name of the Faculty / Observer Title
Sl. No Items for Observation During Presentation 0 1 Communication of the purpose of the talk 2 Evokes audience interest in the subject 3 4 5 The introduction The sequence of ideas The use of practical examples & / or illustrations 6 Speaking style (enjoyable monotonous etc specify) 7 8 Attempts audience participation Summary of the main points at the end 9 10 Asks questions Answers questions asked by the audience 11 Rapport of speker with his audience 12 13 Effectiveness of the talk Uses A vaids appropriately Poor Below Average 1 2 3 Average Good Very Good 4

Date

Total Score

CHECKLIST 6 EVALUATION OF DISSERTATION PRESENTATION


Name of the Trainee Name of the Faculty / Observer Title
Sl. No Items for Observation During Presentation 0 1 2 Interest shown in selecting topic Appropriate review Poor Below Average 1 2 3 Average Good Very Good 4

Date

Discussion with guide & other faculty

4 5

Quality of protocol Preparation of Proforma

Total Score

CHECKLIST 7 EVALUATION OF DISSERTATION WORK BY GUIDE CO-GUIDE


Name of the Trainee Name of the Faculty / Observer Title
Sl. No Items for Observation During Presentation 0 Poor Below Average 1 2 3 Average Good Very Good 4

Date

Periodic Consultation with guide / co-guide

Regular collection of case material

Depth of analysis / discussion

Depth of analysis / discussion

Quality of Final Output

Others

Total Score

You might also like