Professional Documents
Culture Documents
p
0
V
2
g
i
wg
i
w2R
_
arccos h
2
_
1
g
i
w
R
_ (1)
where w is the transverse displacement with respect to the
concentrated mass M, E the Youngs modulus, I the second moment
of the cross-sectional area A, r is the density of the SWCNT material,
a is an internal characteristic length, length of CeC bond (0.142 nm
in graphene), or lattice parameter, granular distance etc. e
0
is a
nonlocal scaling parameter, which has been assumed as a constant
appropriate to each material, it is used to modify the classical
elasticity theory and is limited to apply to a device on the nano-
meter scale and
0
8.854 10
12
C
2
N
1
m
2
is the permittivity of
vacuum. The following non-dimensional quantities are dened as
W
w
g
i
; x
*
x
L
; x
x
s
L
; t
*
t
L
2
EI
rA
(2)
Making all the variables in Eq. (1) dimensionless by using the
non-dimensional quantities of Eq. (2), gives:
W
000 0
W m
2
W
00
d
V
2
1 W
_
1 W
2
g
_
arccos h
2
1 g1 W
(3)
where
l
g
i
L
; d
p
0
L
4
g
2
i
EI
; g
g
i
R
; m
e
0
a
L
(4)
It should be noted that prime and dot indicate derivatives with
respect to non-dimensional position and time, respectively. For
ease of notation, the asterisks in the above equations have been
dropped., To perform a separation of variables analysis, the trans-
verse displacement can be written as:
Wx; t
N
i 1
q
i
t f
i
x (5)
The ith linear undamped mode shape of the uninected canti-
lever beam is considered as
f
i
x cosh b
i
x cos b
i
x a
i
sinh b
i
x sin b
i
x
(6)
a
i
cosh b
i
cos b
i
sinh b
i
sin b
i
(7)
And the values of b
i
quantities are the roots of the characteristic
equation (Eq. (19)) [31]. Haw-Long Lee et al. [31] derived the rela-
tionship equation between the frequency shift of the sensor and the
attached mass. According to Eq. (19) [31], frequency shift of carbon-
nanotube-based mass sensor in the xed-free SWCNT boundary
conditions for the different values of the attached mass and
nonlocal parameters are depicted in Table 2.Where q
i
(t) shows the
dynamic response of SWCNT and 4
i
x i for i 1, 2, 3, ... represent
the normalized mode functions of the beam from the linear
Table 1
SWCNT properties [39].
SWCNT properties Symbol Value Unit
Density r 1330 Kg/m
3
Cross sectional area A 1.024 10
18
m
2
Radius R 0.68 10
9
m
Length L 20.7 10
9
m
Moment of inertia I 2.134 10
37
m
4
Youngs modulus E 1054 10
9
Pa
Table 2
Values of b
1
for the different values of the attached mass and nonlocal parameters
(calculated according toEq. (19) [32]).
M (fg) e
0
0 e
0
0.3617 (Zig-Zag) [45]
x 0.1 x 0.5 x 1 x 0.1 x 0.5 x 1
0 1.8755 1.8755 1.8755 1.8745 1.8745 1.8745
10
8
1.8755 1.8755 1.8745 1.8745 1.8735 1.8675
10
7
1.8755 1.8745 1.8685 1.8745 1.8665 1.8135
10
6
1.8755 1.8675 1.8135 1.8735 1.8035 1.4995
10
5
1.8745 1.8045 1.4995 1.8725 1.4555 0.9435
10
4
1.8735 1.4545 0.9435 1.8545 0.8965 0.5385
10
3
1.8545 0.8965 0.5385 1.5975 0.5095 0.3035
10
2
1.5955 0.5095 0.3035 0.9545 0.2865 0.1705
I. Mehdipour et al. / Current Applied Physics 13 (2013) 1463e1469 1465
vibration analysis owing to the specied boundary condition.
Meanwhile, the mode function 4
i
satises the following formula:
_
1
0
f
i
x f
j
x dx 0 isj
_
1
0
f
i
x f
j
x dx 1 i j
(8)
Based on Galerkins method, by substituting Eq. (5) into in the
governing equation of motion, Eq. (3), then multiplying the ob-
tained equations by the mode shape, 4
1
x, and integrating from
0 to 1, a set of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations are
obtained:
s is numerical parameter obtained simply by algebraic operations
and are completely related to the normalized mode functions.
s
_
1
0
f
1
x
d
2
f
1
x
dx
2
dx (10)
In solving vibration ordinary differential Eq. (9), the
numerical solution (with RungeeKutta method of order 4) for
nonlinear equation is applied [52]. The results are presented
in terms of deection and applied voltage for different initial
gap to length ratio of the CNT and the different value of attached
mass.
3. Numerical results
In current study, the single-walled cantilevered SWCNT is
modeled as clamp-free beam by using nonlocal Euler Bernoulli
beam theory. It is assumed that the CNT has been oscillated in an
electrical eld for measuring the attached mass and predicting the
location of it on the length of the CNT based on pull-in voltage at
the resonance frequency shift. The parameters of the material and
geometry of the CNT are taken as Table 1. It is worthwhile to
determine if sufcient terms have been used in the analysis in order
to obtain converged result in case of series solution. In this regard,
the linear dynamic pull-in voltages at the maximum tip deection
(about 0.75) for the different values of gapelength ratio, l, are
compared in Table 3. The present formulation is validated by
Ref. [39]. According to Table 3, a good agreement can be seen be-
tween the present linear applied dynamic pull-in voltage and the
pervious one [39].
To illustrate the accuracy of the present work, the dynamic pull-
in voltage modeling results are compared with MD simulation [53]
and the dynamic pull-in simulation results [40] in Table 4 for the
initial gaps of 1, 2, and 3 nm in the absent of the nonlocal scaling
parameter e
0
. The gures witness a good agreement for reported
dynamic pull-in voltage in different initial gaps.
Fig. 2 depicts the time history of the cantilever tip deection in
the case of gapelength ratio, l 0.5, for different applied voltages.
As shown, before pull-in voltage (V
PI
10.1683), the response is
periodic and an increase in the applied voltage would increase the
vibration amplitude and decrease the vibration frequency. Beyond
the V
PI
value, periodic motion alters to a divergent motion and the
beam collapses onto the electrode plate and the tip deection
approaches 1. Separation point from the periodic to divergent
motion is an index for sensing the pull-in voltage. Moreover, It is
important to note that dynamic pull-in phenomenon occurs when
the tip dimensionless deection is reached to W 0.75.
Fig. 3 illustrates the phase plot in the case of gapelength ratio,
l 0.5, at various applied voltages. The shown dynamic response in
Fig. 3 conrms that dynamic pull-in happens when the tip deec-
tion is close to W 0.75, and increasing the applied voltage
slightly from 10.1683 to 10.17 V, the periodic motion changes to a
divergent motion and the nano-cantilever suddenly collapses onto
the substrate plate.
Table 3
Comparison of linear pull-in voltage with different gapelength ratio, l with e
0
0.
l V
PI
(Linear) [39] V
PI
(Linear) Eq. (3) % Error
0.1 1.324 1.319 0.3776
0.25 4.249 4.240 0.2118
0.5 10.19 10.169 0.2061
0.75 16.905 16.868 0.2189
Table 4
Comparison of dynamic pull-in voltages for different initial gaps in e
0
0.
Initial gap, r (nm) V
PI
MD [53] V
PI
[40] V
PI
Present work
1 1.64 1.59 1.61
2 9 9.08 9.02
3 17.8 18.05 17.9
t
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
W
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
V=9
V=10
V =10.1683
V=10.17
Fig. 2. Non-dimensional tip deection time history for different voltage V, e
0
0,
l 0.5 and M 0.
_
1 sm
2
_
d
2
q
1
t
dt
2
b
4
1
q
1
t d
_
1
0
f
1
xV
2
dx
1 f
1
xq
1
t
_
1 f
1
xq
1
t
2
g
_
arccos h
2
1 g1 f
1
xq
1
t
(9)
I. Mehdipour et al. / Current Applied Physics 13 (2013) 1463e1469 1466
Fig. 4 demonstrates tip deection versus applied voltage onto
nanotube with attached mass in three different gaps. As can be
seen, before pull-in voltage (pull-in deection at W 0.75), the
tip deection decrease customarily by increasing the applied
voltage. But at pull-in deection, by a slight increase in the applied
voltage, the tip deection decreased dramatically in an unusual
manner and the tip of carbon nanotube sticks to the electrode plate
and the tip deection approaches 1. Our present model just can
anticipate the vibrational behavior of carbon nanotube until pull-in
deection. After this spot, the motion of carbon nanotube is not
oscillatory. Otherwise stated, it has a divergent motion, so it is
obvious that this model does not work. Hence, the dimensionless
tip deection at about 0.75 is our reference point to measure the
dynamic pull-in voltage. At rst glance on Fig. 4, it can be seen by
increasing gap between nanotube and substrate plate, pull-in
voltage increase. It is important to mention that the increase in
attached mass would lead to decrease in pull-in voltage.
Table 5 represents the dynamic pull-in voltage regarding to the
different values of the attached mass (M), nonlocal parameters (e
0
)
and gapelength ratio, l, and location, x, respectively. As a rst
glance, it can be found by increasing gap-length ratio the pull-in
voltage increases. In addition, for all values of x, pull-in voltage
diminishes when attached mass to the nanotube increases. Ac-
cording to Table 4, to describe the effects of nonlocal parameter (e
0
)
on dynamic pull-in voltage, it can be seen that when carbon
nanotube vibrates under electrode eld without attached mass, by
increasing the value of nonlocal parameter, the dynamic pull-in
voltage decreases and this result has also resulted for different
gap-length ratio, l.
Furthermore, the location of attached mass can affect on the
changes in dynamic pull-in voltage of the mass sensor. Fig. 5
Fig. 4. Variation of the maximum tip deection of the CNT with attached mass at
position x 1, versus DC voltage V for various l and M in e
0
0.
W
-1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0
d
W
/
d
t
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
V=9
V=10
V =10.1683
V=10.17
Fig. 3. Phase portrait under different applied voltages, e
0
0, l 0.5 and M 0.
Table 5
Values of dynamic pull-in voltage V
PI
for the different values of the attached mass
(M), nonlocal parameters (e
0
) and gapelength ratio, l.
l M (fg) e
0
0 nm e
0
0.3617 (Zig-Zag)nm[45]
x 0.1 x 0.5 x 1 x 0.1 x 0.5 x 1
0.25 0 4.240 4.240 4.240 4.239 4.239 4.239
10
8
4.240 4.240 4.234 4.239 4.238 4.231
10
7
4.240 4.234 4.227 4.239 4.23 4.172
10
6
4.240 4.226 4.167 4.238 4.162 3.925
10
5
4.234 4.158 3.920 4.237 3.901 3.747
10
4
4.233 3.895 3.741 4.216 3.743 3.718
10
3
4.212 3.735 3.712 3.987 3.718 3.716
10
2
3.980 3.712 3.709 3.749 3.716 3.716
0.5 0 10.169 10.169 10.169 10.166 10.166 10.166
10
8
10.169 10.169 10.166 10.166 10.163 10.147
10
7
10.169 10.166 10.149 10.166 10.144 10.005
10
6
10.169 10.147 10.005 10.163 9.981 9.412
10
5
10.166 9.983 9.412 10.16 9.355 8.987
10
4
10.163 9.354 8.985 10.111 8.975 8.917
10
3
10.111 8.971 8.916 9.56 8.915 8.911
10
2
9.557 8.915 8.910 8.989 8.908 8.890
0.75 0 16.868 16.868 16.868 16.863 16.863 16.863
10
8
16.868 16.868 16.863 16.863 16.858 16.831
10
7
16.868 16.863 16.835 16.863 16.826 16.596
10
6
16.868 16.831 16.596 16.858 16.555 15.612
10
5
16.863 16.559 15.612 16.854 15.517 14.906
10
4
16.858 15.515 14.904 16.772 14.88 14.791
10
3
16.772 14.880 14.788 15.858 14.787 14.78
10
2
15.853 14.785 14.780 14.91 14.776 14.777
Fig. 5. The effects of value and location (from x 0e1) of attached mass on the
dynamic pull-in voltage for various nonlocal parameters in l 0.75.
I. Mehdipour et al. / Current Applied Physics 13 (2013) 1463e1469 1467
demonstrates the effect of location of attached mass, x, as well as
value of mass on the dynamic pull-in voltage of the cantilever mass
sensor for all e
0
. It can be found that the effect of the location of
attached mass on the dynamic pull-in voltage of the mass sensor is
signicant. Increasing the value of x decreases the dynamic pull-in
voltage. This is because the requisite voltage of the sensor with the
attached mass decreases with increasing the particle mass.
Growing the value of x is equivalent to an increase of the particle
mass at the same location. According to Fig. 5, the effect of small
scaling parameter (e
0
) on dynamic pull-in is considerable. Because
of alteration of small parameter (e
0
), dynamic pull-in voltage
decline when the location of mass on the length of the CNT is
constant. This trend is more intensive for heavy particles.
To further investigate the effects of the value and location of
attached mass and small scale (nonlocal parameter) on the dynamic
pull-in voltage of the SWCNT based sensor, the results with or
without the attached mass are compared. Fig. 6 is described the
sensitivityof CNTas a functionof logarithmic value of attachedmass.
The sensitivity of CNT dynamic pull-in voltage ratio is dened as:
Fig. 6 depicts the inuence of location of attached mass on the
sensitivity of the sensor for distinctive nonlocal parameter, e
0
in
different gap-length ratio, l. It can be seen that the sensitivity is
remained stable with increasing mass at location of x 0.1,
however, for last two or three masses noticeable increase in
sensitivity can be found. On the other hand, the trend for two
other values of x 0.5, 1.0 is completely different for the previous
one and a high sensitivity is divulged the sensor is strongly
dependent on the location of attached mass, x, for attached mass
larger than 10
7
(fg) and smaller than 10
2
(fg). Otherwise stated,
for very large and small masses the sensitivity of sensor does not
change signicantly. From Fig. 6, it is obvious that to sense of
large mass, the location of attached mass should be farther
from the tip, but for small one, it should locate at the tip. The
mass sensitivity of the nano-electro-mechanical sensor can reach
at least 10
22
g, which has the similar order as mentioned in
Ref. [6]. Therefore, most of the bacterium/virus, the mass of
which is around 10
20
g [50,51], can be detected. Surprisingly,
due to considering the inuence of nonlocal parameter, e
0
, in
EulereBernoulli beam theory, the graph demonstrated that the
mass sensitivity of carbon nanotube increased remarkably.
Regarding gap-length ratio, l, the results have proved that
alternative initial gaps impact on mass sensitivity of carbon
nanotubes is not noticeable. In other words, in every initial gap,
the mass sensitivity of CNT is almost the same without consid-
erable changing.
4. Conclusions
This paper has developed a new mass sensor equation
for modeling the vibration behavior of a cantilevered
zigzag single-walled carbon nanotube with attached mass at
different location of its length by using the pull-in phenome-
non at resonant frequency shift. The dynamic pull-in voltage at
resonant frequency shift of the cantilevered SWCNT has been
investigated. In addition, the validity and the accuracy of
these formulas have examined with other pull-in voltage
equations existing the literature. The following points can be
summarized:
(1) By this model, it can be sensed the attached mass at each po-
sition of a cantilevered SWCNT length by using the pull-in
phenomenon at resonant frequency shift.
(2) Dynamic pull-in spot is the point that the dimensionless tip
deection is about 0.75 and it is a reference point to measure
the dynamic pull-in voltage.
(3) At different positions of attached mass, by increasing the
value of attached mass, the dynamic pull-in voltage is
decreased.
(4) At constant value of the attached mass, by increasing the
position of attached mass, x, the dynamic pull-in voltage is
decreased.
(5) The mass sensitivity of carbon nanotube increases when the
position of the attached mass, x, is in the tip of a cantilevered
SWCNT length.
(6) Also, the numerical results indicate that the mass sensitivity
of carbon nanotube-based nanobalances can reach up to
10
22
kg,
(7) By considering nonlocal scaling parameter e
0
, the mass sensi-
tivity is soared notably.
(8) The results indicate that the new model can be used for elec-
trostatically actuated cantilevered SWCNT-based mass sensors
with reasonable accuracy.
DV
PI
V
PI0
dynamic pull in voltageof CNT without attached mass dynamic pull in voltage of CNT with attached mass
dynamic pull in voltageof CNT without attached mass
(11)