Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mnirert -States
O.v EC 3CSlC-<475
6DUTH 0**C"*. t'X C^'ICIP
_
September 26, i/-i/-v-i
2003
Sincerely,
Enclosure
NCT0058340
Questions for the Record
a, During your briefing to the Committee, you indicated that the analysis
your staff performed was for the purpose of formulating policy. Therefore, it
would have been inappropriate to ask the CIA or the DIA to perform this function.
Please provide examples of the policy recommendations, if any, that were
produced as a result of this analysis.
b. In your June 28, 2003 letter to the Chairman, referring to the two-person
cell, you state, "It was not involved in intelligence collection." Please define
intelligence collection as used in your letter.
2. Personnel Issues
a. Who were the two full-time individuals who comprised the so-called
"cell" to which you refer in the fourth paragraph of your letter of June 28, 2003?
b. Your letter states that other Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)
staffers periodically worked with team members on matters related to terrorism.
Who were the other staffers?
NCT0058341
3. Documents
NCT0058342
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
20OO DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, DC 2O3O1-2OOO
DouglasJ.Feith
Enclosure
THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
2000 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, DC 2O3O1-2OOO
POLICY
Enclosed are answers to the questions for the record posed in your letter of
October 1 , 2003. Please note that the attachments include classified information.
Douglas J. Feith
Enclosure
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 20 oct 03
1400
la. The work of the Policy Counter Terrorism Evaluation Group (PCTEG)
members and other staff members were inputs into the policy formulation process.
These inputs contributed to policy formulation on issues such as:
• DoD response to the presence in Iraq of the al-Qaida affiliated Ansar al-Islam
terrorist group.
• DoD response to the presence in Iraq of al-Qaida operative Abu Musab al-
Zarqawi and his CBW network.
• Helping to formulate requirements for the debriefings of al-Qaida fighters
detained at Guantanamo and Bagram.
NCT0058345
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 20 oct 03
1400
For the reason mentioned above, we are not providing the names of individual
consultants.
OUSDP currently has five consultants on the books who deal or have dealt with
"Iraq, terrorism or related issues." Three of them are in the process of being hired
as full-time staffers, and one was brought on as a consultant upon leaving a full-
time position.
In addition, since January 2001, OUSDP had eleven other consultants who dealt
with "Iraq, terrorism or related issues." Eight of these were subsequently hired as
full-time employees of the Department. Seven of the eleven individuals served in
Baghdad, either when they were consultants or after having been hired as full-time
employees.
3a. The meetings referred to are:
- Secretary of Defense briefing (August 2002)
- DCI briefing (August 2002)
- Discussion among two OSD staffers and a number of CIA and DIA
analysts (August 2002)
- Briefing for NSC and Office of the Vice President staffers (September
2002)
3b. The purpose of the briefing to the Secretary of Defense was to inform his
thinking on various sources of support for terrorism. As a specific result of the
briefing, arrangements were made to give the briefing to the DCI. Then there was
the discussion between the OSD staffers involved and analysts from the
Intelligence Community. I am not aware of any actions resulting from the DCI
briefing, the staff-level discussion or the briefing to staff members of the NSC and
the Office of the Vice President.
3c. I preface my answer with a word on how the reports you asked about came to my
attention.
An OUSDP staffer, in the course of routine duties, discovered (in March 2002) some
CIA reports on the relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida which had not been reflected
in recent finished intelligence products. The staffer continued to research special
HUMINT information on the issue - Iraq and al-Qaida connections - without having
been requested to do so. No one higher up in the staffer's chain of command was aware
of this early endeavor. In April 2002, the staffer brought some of the material to the
attention of the DIA's Terrorism Center, the office of the J-2, and the DIO for the
Middle East.
The staffer prepared a report and passed it up the chain of command, eventually to
me in July 2002. It included information on Iraq and al-Qaida and consisted mostly
of CIA reporting; a few other reports, from FBI and NSA, were also included. The
NCT0058346
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 20 oct 03
1400
NCT0058347
WITH DRAWAL NOTICE
RG: 148
Box: 00008 Folder: 0002 Document: 45
Series: Team 1 Files
Copies: 1 Pages: 20
ACCESS RESTRICTED
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:
In the review of this file this item was removed because access to it is
restricted. Restrictions on records in the National Archives are stated in
general and specific record group restriction statements which are available
for examination.
NND: 281
Withdrawn: 04-14-2008 by:
Original Message
From: Philip Zelikow
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:37 PM
To: Doug MacEachin; Yoel Tobin
Cc: Front Office
Subject: FW: further on Dd DR#51 documents
Let Dan and Steve know how you want them to proceed.
I've reviewed the documents specifically requested in DCI DR#51. Below are my
findings broken down into 4 categories:
Letters t, v & y are all the same document, This document was provided to the
Commission on October 8, 2003 as bates number 1500099
Letter u. was provided to the Commission on July 2, 2003 (pre-bates stamping)
Letter w. was provided twice to the Commission, the first time on July 9, 2003
(pre-bates stamping) and then again on October 8, 2003 as bates number 1500100
Documents out of the scope of the Commission's mandate in that they report
information relating to 2002 operations and have nothine at all to do with 9/11. AO
evolution or the ore 9/11 context ofAO's relationship with Iraq:
• Letters a., b., p., z., aa., bb., cc. & dd.
The remaining documents I find to be within the scope of the Commission's mandate and
will make available if this is still what the Commission wants of this document request.
Please advise.
WITH DRAWAL NOTICE
RG: 148
Box: 00008 Folder: 0002 Document: 46
Series: Team 1 Files
Copies: 1 Pages: 2
ACCESS RESTRICTED
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:
In the review of this file this item was removed because access to it is
restricted. Restrictions on records in the National Archives are stated in
general and specific record group restriction statements which are available
for examination.
NND:281
Withdrawn: 04-14-2008 by:
A Resource
S Program
&—«/
Subdivisions of Dl:
The Secretariat
Audit
Security
Salaries
Electronic equipment
Reception and appointments
Internal and external co-ordination
Political Bureau
The Political Bureau is probably the most important branch of the Mukhabarat. It includes a number of
Directorates.
http://www.fas.org/irp/worlQViraq/mukhabarat/org.htm 3/26/2004
WITH DRAWAL NOTICE
RG: 148
Box: 00008 Folder: 0002 Document: 47
Series: Team 1 Files
Z
Copies: X Pages: 1
ACCESS RESTRICTED
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:
In the review of this file this item was removed because access to it is
restricted. Restrictions on records in the National Archives are stated in
general and specific record group restriction statements which are available
for examination.
NND:281
Withdrawn: 04-14-2008 by: h
i
^
C(
WITH DRAWAL NOTICE
RG: 148
Box: 00008 Folder: 0002 Document: 48
Series: Team 1 Files
Copies: 1 Pages: 39
ACCESS RESTRICTED
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:
In the review of this file this item was removed because access to it is
restricted. Restrictions on records in the National Archives are stated in
general and specific record group restriction statements which are available
for examination.
NND: 281
Withdrawn: 04-14-2008 by: