Genesis 4:1 - ...she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD.

Cain: Seed of the Serpent Who begat the first murderer Cain? Another famous story: Cain kills Abel; his own brother. Now, what would possess a man to do something so horrible? Cain didn't have a hungry family. There wasn't a war going on. As

we recall from Untold Garden of Eden, the serpent and Eve may have gone a little farther than just eating a piece of fruit. Their offspring, according to many ancient sources, was Cain.(1)The common word for fathering a child, in the Bible, is begat. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that Adam begat Cain! Although Cain was a child of Eve, he could possibly have had the genes of someone else: an upset and complaining angelic being, now made human for his punishment. With all the anger and resentment inside this angelic being, could it be assumed that the Serpent would pass his negative attributes on to whomever he had sired? Could this

have been a reason why Cain could so easily have committed murder? The serpent (Azazel or Nachash), as postulated before, may have used sex to seduce Eve. Through their fornication, she became pregnant. As a result, the two may have produced twins: both Cain and Abel. Nowhere in the Bible does it say either Cain nor Abel were Adam's son, nor were they listed in any genealogies of Adam (Genesis 5:1)! Cain, on the other hand, was said to be "of the wicked one" (in I John 3:12). The Bible even states the third son born to Eve, Seth, was the first child born to her that actually resembled Adam (Genesis 5:3)! Could the first two offspring of the

Bible possess the blood of someone else? Lets look: And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain... Genesis 4:1 (KJV) To many this is proof positive Adam had sex with his wife, and was the father of Cain. The word knew, if we examine the original Hebrew in this verse, does have the meaning of "sex" (which makes it easy to assume they copulated). This word, however, could also stand for something totally different. The word knew actually

comes from two Hebrew words: yada and eth. The word yada not only means to "have carnal sex with," but also "to recognize," "discern," and "acknowledge."(2) The word eth is Untranslatable in English, but generally relates to "a sign," "a distinguishing mark," or "omen."(3) From these other meanings, we could reconstruct the verse into the following: And Adam eventually acknowledged the distinguishing sign that had come upon Eve...Genesis 4:1 (KJV) Also, the Hebrew word for conceived (in the above English translation) could mean "to already be with child." Put them all together and we gather another possible

meaning to the verse: And Adam eventually acknowledged the distinguishing sign that had come upon Eve; that she was with child, and realized she was about to give birth to Cain... Genesis 4:1 (KJV) The verse takes on a whole new meaning. Could it also mean that it was time for Cain to be born, and Adam understood it? See how easily verses could be mistranslated when people assume they should say something a certain way?

The next part of this same verse gives even more creditability for our argument. Apparently, when Eve first saw the baby Cain, she thought she had gotten him from somewhere beyond her world.(4) As the rest of the verse states, Eve exclaims: "I have gotten a man from the LORD" (Genesis 4:1 KJV). According to the New Jerusalem Translation, the verse translates from the Hebrew a little differently:... I have gotten a man from an angel of the LORD. "An angel of the LORD" - a fallen angel of the garden, maybe? Eve apparently thought Cain was of someone very significant. In Untold

Garden of Eden, we already know how the angels of the six-day creation rebelled, and descend to earth, and took on human form. After the fall of Adam and Eve, God was forced to deal out punishments to them all. Curiously enough, most of the punishments to Eve were related to pregnancy or childbirth. Why? Were they directly related to the act the serpent and Eve participated in, just before the fall? Interestingly enough, there were also curses to the serpent along these same lines: But He (God) turned to the serpent (in great wrath) and said: 'Since thou hast done this... There shall not be left thee ear, nor wing, nor one limb of all that with

which thou did ensnare them in thy malice and caused them to be cast out of paradise... The Apocalypse of Moses, 26:1-4 Apparently, God dished out punishments as "an eye for an eye" - the serpent's sexual "limb" was cursed for the way he used it. This answers how Cain allowed himself to go down the wrong paths in life: After Adam and his wife sinned, and the serpent had intercourse with Eve and injected filth into her, Eve bore Cain. He had the shape from above and from below (the earth)... Therefore, he was the first to

bring death into the world, caused by his side, as he came from the filth of the serpent. The nature of the serpent is to lurk, so as to kill, and his issue, Cain, learned his ways.(5) The Zohar, Pekudei 21 Cain apparently carried on the attributes of his father, which could have easily led him to murder Abel. In another curse to the serpent, God made a prediction, in probably one of the most important prophecies of the Bible: And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou

shalt bruise his heel. Genesis 3:15 (KJV)The verse is a little complex; divided into two parts. First, it states the seeds (or descendants) of the serpent will be at enmity with the seeds of Eve. The serpent's seed would form into one bloodline, Adam's pure, whole seed into another. The second part simply was a prediction about YAHUSHA BEN YOSEF aka CHRIST himself, and how he (a member of Eve's seed) would eventually bruise the serpent's head, but members of the serpent seed would only be able to bruise the heel of Jesus. In other words, by crucifying him on the cross, there would be descendants of the serpent who would only be able to bruise Jesus's "heel," but YAHUSHA

would become victorious in the end. By raising himself from the dead, YAHUSHA would defeat the serpent's curse of death on the world, and rectify the curse of death Adam and Eve brought to the world he would crush the serpent's power, or head. If YAHUSHA was from the true seed of Adam and Eve, which the Bible clearly stated, then this prophecy would be fulfilled upon his death, burial and resurrection. The seeds of the serpent, throughout history, would possess an enmity with the blood line that would lead to YAHUSHA and his teachings from then on. If Cain (and probably

others) indeed had the blood (or seed) of the serpent then his descendants would, naturally, be up in arms against anything that is truly, purely, of Jesus, and of God.Those who have blood of the serpent and other fallen angels would go on to form what was known as "mixed multitudes." The conflict between the morals, religious beliefs, and ways of life of these mixed groups would continually oppose those who descended from Adam to this very day, for the reasons above. This would go on to form one of the most important conflicts in human history:... the members of the mixed multitude are the children of the primordial serpent that seduced Chavah (Eve) by the tree of

knowledge, so the mixed multitude is indeed the impurity that the serpent injected into Chavah. From this impurity, which is considered the mixed multitude, Kayin (Cain) came forth and slew Hevel (Abel)...(6) The Zohar, 2 Beresheet a28 There is more about these mixed multitudes, and how their thoughts, attitudes, and ways of life, relate to Adam, Jesus, and this prophecy of the Bible. We will discover how Cain and other serpent-seeds began to influence the world in Way of Cain. First, to understand more about how life was

lived in the days of the patriarch Cain, see "Birds" and "Beasts". There is a lot more ancient evidence to support this claim of Cain's bloodline, as well as their attributes, in the upcoming book, The Rise of Mystery Babylon. Footnotes: (1) The Midrash Rabbah, Bereshith (Genesis) 24:6, trans. Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman and Maurice Simon (London: The Soncino Press, 1961). (2) Strongs H3045 - yada, http://www.blueletterbible. org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H 3045&t=KJV (accessed Aug. 11, 2010).

(3) Strongs H853 - eth, http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexi con/lexicon. cfm?Strongs=H853&t=KJV (accessed Aug. 11, 2010). (4) Targum Pseudo-Jonathan (Targum of Palestine / Targum of Jonathan Ben Uzziel), On the Book of Genesis, Section 4, Berashith, http://targum. info/pj/pjgen1-6.htm (accessed Oct. 2, 2009). (5) The Zohar, Volume 13, Pekudei, Section 21. Breastplate and Efod, 203, https://www2.kabbalah.com/k/index. php/p=zohar/zohar&vol=26&sec=912 (accessed Feb. 24, 2010).

(6) The Zohar, Volume 1, Beresheet A, Section 28. Hevel-Moshe, 285, www2.kabbalah.com/k/index.php/p=zo har/zohar&vol=2&sec=49 (accessed Feb. 24, 2010).

Copyright 2012, Brett T., All Rights Reserved

Who begat the first murderer Cain?

Another famous story: Cain kills Abel; his own brother. Now, what would possess a man to do something so horrible? Cain didn't have a hungry

family. There wasn't a war going on. As we recall from Untold Garden of Eden, the serpent and Eve may have gone a little farther than just eating a piece of fruit. Their offspring, according to many ancient sources, was Cain.(1) The common word for fathering a child, in the Bible, is begat. Nowhere in the Bible does it say that Adam begat Cain! Although Cain was a child of Eve, he could possibly have had the genes of someone else: an upset and complaining angelic being, now made human for his punishment. With all the anger and resentment inside this angelic being, could it be assumed that

the Serpent would pass his negative attributes on to whomever he had sired? Could this have been a reason why Cain could so easily have committed murder? The serpent (Azazel or Nachash), as postulated before, may have used sex to seduce Eve. Through their fornication, she became pregnant. As a result, the two may have produced twins: both Cain and Abel. Nowhere in the Bible does it say either Cain nor Abel were Adam's son, nor were they listed in any genealogies of Adam (Genesis 5:1)! Cain, on the other hand,

was said to be "of the wicked one" (in I John 3:12). The Bible even states the third son born to Eve, Seth, was the first child born to her that actually resembled Adam (Genesis 5:3)! Could the first two offspring of the Bible possess the blood of someone else? Lets look:

And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain... Genesis 4:1 (KJV)

To many this is proof positive Adam had sex with his wife, and was the

father of Cain. The word knew, if we examine the original Hebrew in this verse, does have the meaning of "sex" (which makes it easy to assume they copulated). This word, however, could also stand for something totally different. The word knew actually comes from two Hebrew words: yada and eth. The word yada not only means to "have carnal sex with," but also "to recognize," "discern," and "acknowledge."(2) The word eth is untranslatable in English, but generally relates to "a sign," "a distinguishing mark," or "omen."(3) From these other meanings, we could reconstruct the

verse into the following:

And Adam eventually acknowledged the distinguishing sign that had come upon Eve... Genesis 4:1 (KJV)

Also, the Hebrew word for conceived (in the above English translation) could mean "to already be with child." Put them all together and we gather another possible meaning to the verse:

And Adam eventually acknowledged the distinguishing sign that had come upon Eve; that she was with child, and realized she was about to give birth to Cain... Genesis 4:1 (KJV)

The verse takes on a whole new meaning. Could it also mean that it was time for Cain to be born, and Adam understood it? See how easily verses could be mistranslated when people assume they should say something a certain way?

The next part of this same verse gives even more creditability for our argument. Apparently, when Eve first saw the baby Cain, she thought she had gotten him from somewhere beyond her world.(4) As the rest of the verse states, Eve exclaims: "I have gotten a man from the LORD" (Genesis 4:1 KJV). According to the New Jerusalem Translation, the verse translates from the Hebrew a little differently:

... I have gotten a man from an angel of the LORD.

"An angel of the LORD" - a fallen angel of the garden, maybe? Eve apparently thought Cain was of someone very significant. In Untold Garden of Eden, we already know how the angels of the six-day creation rebelled, and descend to earth, and took on human form. After the fall of Adam and Eve, God was forced to deal out punishments to them all. Curiously enough, most of the punishments to Eve were related to pregnancy or childbirth. Why? Were they directly related to the act the serpent and Eve participated in, just before the fall?

Interestingly enough, there were also curses to the serpent along these same lines:

But He (God) turned to the serpent (in great wrath) and said: 'Since thou hast done this... There shall not be left thee ear, nor wing, nor one limb of all that with which thou did ensnare them in thy malice and causesdst them to be cast out of paradise... The Apocalypse of Moses, 26:1-4

Apparently, God dished out punishments as "an eye for an eye" - the serpent's sexual "limb" was cursed for the way he used it. This answers how Cain allowed himself to go down the wrong paths in life:

After Adam and his wife sinned, and the serpent had intercourse with Eve and injected filth into her, Eve bore Cain. He had the shape from above and from below (the earth)... Therefore, he was the first to bring death into the world, caused by his side, as he came from the filth of the serpent. The nature of the serpent is to lurk, so as to kill, and his issue,

Cain, learned his ways.(5) The Zohar, Pekudei 21

Cain apparently carried on the attributes of his father, which could have easily led him to murder Abel. In another curse to the serpent, God made a prediction, in probably one of the most important prophecies of the Bible:

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. Genesis 3:15 (KJV)

The verse is a little complex; divided into two parts. First, it states the seeds (or descendants) of the serpent will be at enmity with the seeds of Eve. The serpent's seed would form into one bloodline, Adam's pure, whole seed into another. The second part simply was a prediction about YAHUSHA BEN YOSEF aka CHRIST himself, and how he (a member of Eve's seed) would eventually bruise the serpent's head, but members of the serpent seed would only be able to bruise the heel of Jesus. In other words, by crucifying him on the cross, there would

be descendants of the serpent who would only be able to bruise Jesus's "heel," but YAHUSHA would become victorious in the end. By raising himself from the dead, YAHUSHA would defeat the serpent's curse of death on the world, and rectify the curse of death Adam and Eve brought to the world he would crush the serpent's power, or head. If YAHUSHA was from the true seed of Adam and Eve, which the Bible clearly stated, then this prophecy would be fulfilled upon his death, burial and resurrection. The seeds of the serpent, throughout history, would possess

an enmity with the blood line that would lead to YAHUSHA and his teachings from then on. If Cain (and probably others) indeed had the blood (or seed) of the serpent then his descendants would, naturally, be up in arms against anything that is truly, purely, of Jesus, and of God. Those who have blood of the serpent and other fallen angels would go on to form what was known as "mixed multitudes." The conflict between the morals, religious beliefs, and ways of life of these mixed groups would

continually oppose those who descended from Adam to this very day, for the reasons above. This would go on to form one of the most important conflicts in human history:

... the members of the mixed multitude are the children of the primordial serpent that seduced Chavah (Eve) by the tree of knowledge, so the mixed multitude is indeed the impurity that the serpent injected into Chavah. From this impurity, which is considered the mixed multitude, Kayin (Cain) came forth and slew Hevel (Abel)...(6)

The Zohar, 2 Beresheet a28

There is more about these mixed multitudes, and how their thoughts, attitudes, and ways of life, relate to Adam, Jesus, and this prophecy of the Bible. We will discover how Cain and other serpent-seeds began to influence the world in Way of Cain. First, to understand more about how life was lived in the days of the patriarch Cain, see "Birds" and "Beasts". There is a lot more ancient evidence to support this claim of Cain's

bloodline, as well as their attributes, in the upcoming book, The Rise of Mystery Babylon.

Footnotes: (1) The Midrash Rabbah, Bereshith (Genesis) 24:6, trans. Rabbi Dr. H. Freedman and Maurice Simon (London: The Soncino Press, 1961). (2) Strongs H3045 - yada, http://www.blueletterbible. org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H 3045&t=KJV (accessed Aug. 11, 2010).

(3) Strongs H853 - eth, http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexi con/lexicon. cfm?Strongs=H853&t=KJV (accessed Aug. 11, 2010). (4) Targum Pseudo-Jonathan (Targum of Palestine / Targum of Jonathan Ben Uzziel), On the Book of Genesis, Section 4, Berashith, http://targum. info/pj/pjgen1-6.htm (accessed Oct. 2, 2009). (5) The Zohar, Volume 13, Pekudei, Section 21. Breastplate and Efod, 203, https://www2.kabbalah.com/k/index. php/p=zohar/zohar&vol=26&sec=912 (accessed Feb. 24, 2010).

(6) The Zohar, Volume 1, Beresheet A, Section 28. Hevel-Moshe, 285, www2.kabbalah.com/k/index.php/p=zo har/zohar&vol=2&sec=49 (accessed Feb. 24, 2010).

Copyright 2012, Brett T., All Rights Reserved

Gense 4:1 - ... elle conut, et enfanta Can et elle dit, je ont acquis un homme de par l'Eternel. Cain: Semence de l' Serpent

Qui engendra le premier meurtrier Can? Un autre clbre histoire: Can tue Abel, son propre frre. Maintenant, ce qui possderait un homme de faire quelque chose de si horrible? Can n'avait pas de famille affame. Il n'y avait pas une guerre en cours. Comme nous rappelons de jardin Untold d'Eden, le serpent et Eve peut-tre all un peu plus loin que juste manger un morceau de fruit. Leur progniture, selon de nombreuses sources antiques, tait Can. (1) Le mot commun pour concevoir un enfant, dans la Bible, est engendr. Nulle part dans la Bible il n'est dit que Adam engendra

Can! Bien que Can tait un enfant d'Eve, il aurait pu avoir les gnes de quelqu'un d'autre: un tre boulevers et se plaindre anglique, maintenant fait homme pour sa punition. Avec toute la colre et le ressentiment l'intrieur de cet tre anglique, peut-on supposer que le serpent passait ses attributs ngatifs qui il avait dsir? Cela aurait-il une raison pour laquelle Can ne pouvait donc facilement avoir commis assassiner? Le serpent (Azazel ou Nachash), tel que postul avant, peut-tre utilis le sexe pour sduire Eve. Grce leur fornication, elle est tombe enceinte. En consquence, les deux peut-tre produit des jumeaux: Can et Abel. Nulle part

dans la Bible ce qu'elle dit soit Can ni Abel taient fils d'Adam, et ils n'taient pas rpertoris dans les gnalogies d'Adam (Gense 5:1)! Can, d'autre part, a t, dit-on "du malin" (dans I Jean 3:12). La Bible dclare mme le troisime fils n d'Eve, Seth, tait le premier enfant n d'elle qui en fait ressemblait Adam (Gense 5:3)! Pourriez les deux premiers enfants de la Bible possde le sang de quelqu'un d'autre? Regardons: Et Adam connut Eve, sa femme, et elle conut, et enfanta Can ... Gense 4:1 (LSG)

Pour beaucoup, c'est une preuve positive Adam eu des relations sexuelles avec sa femme, et tait le pre de Can. Le mot savait, si nous examinons l'original hbreu dans ce verset, ne le sens du mot sexe (ce qui le rend facile de supposer qu'ils ont copul). Ce mot, cependant, pourrait galement signifier quelque chose de totalement diffrent. Le mot savait vient en fait de deux mots hbreux: yada et thiques. Le mot yada ne signifie pas seulement de faire l'amour charnel avec, mais aussi reconnatre, discerner et reconnatre. (2) Le mot est eth . Intraduisible en anglais, mais se rapporte gnralement un "signe", "signe distinctif" ou "omen" (3) A partir

de ces autres significations, nous avons pu reconstituer le verset en ce qui suit: Et Adam a fini par reconnatre le signe distinctif qui avait venir sur Eve ... Gense 4:1 (LSG) De mme, le mot hbreu pour concevoir (dans la traduction anglaise ci-dessus) pourrait signifier tre dj enceinte." Mettez-les tous ensemble et nous nous runissons une autre signification possible de ce verset: Et Adam a fini par reconnatre le signe distinctif qui leur taient survenues la veille, qu'elle tait enceinte, et se rendit compte qu'elle tait sur le point de donner naissance Can ... Gense 4:1 (LSG)

Le verset prend une toute nouvelle signification. Pourrait-il aussi signifier qu'il tait temps de Can natre, et Adam a compris? Voyez comment facilement versets pourraient tre mal traduit que les gens croient qu'ils devraient dire quelque chose d'une certaine faon? La partie suivante de ce mme verset donne crdibilit encore plus pour notre argument. Apparemment, quand Eve a vu le bb Cain, elle pensait qu'elle avait obtenu de quelque part au-del de son monde (4). Comme le reste du verset, Eve s'exclame: J'ai acquis un homme de par l'Eternel" (Gense 4:1 LSG). Selon la

traduction de la Nouvelle Jrusalem, le verset traduit de l'hbreu un peu diffremment: ... J'ai acquis un homme d'un ange de l'ternel. "Un ange de l'Eternel" - un ange dchu du jardin, peut-tre? Eve apparemment pens que Can tait quelqu'un de trs important. Dans Untold Jardin d'Eden, nous savons dj comment les anges de la cration en six jours se rvolta, et de descendre terre, et a pris une forme humaine. Aprs la chute d'Adam et Eve, Dieu a d faire face des punitions tous. Curieusement, la plupart des punitions Eve taient lies la grossesse ou l'accouchement. Pourquoi? Ont-ils t

directement lie l'acte, le serpent et Eve particip, juste avant la chute? Chose intressante, il y avait aussi des maldictions le serpent le long de ces mmes lignes: Mais Il (Dieu) se tourna vers le serpent (dans une grande colre) et dit: Puisque tu as fait cela ... Il ne doit pas tre laiss oreille toi, ni aile, ni un membre de tout ce que dont tu ne les prendre au pige dans ta mchancet, et les fit chasss du paradis ... L'Apocalypse de Mose, 26:1-4 Apparemment, Dieu distribuait punitions comme un il pour un il sexuelle du serpent "membre" a t

maudit pour la faon dont il l'a utilis. Cela rpond que Can se laissa descendre les mauvais chemins dans la vie: Aprs qu'Adam et sa femme ont pch, et le serpent a eu des rapports avec Eve et inject dans sa crasse, Eve enfanta Can. Il avait la forme d'en haut et d'en bas (la terre) ... Par consquent, il a t le premier porter la mort dans le monde, due son ct, comme il est venu de la salet du serpent. La nature du serpent est de se cacher, de manire tuer, et son problme, Can, a appris sa faon (5). Le Zohar, Pekoudei 21

Can apparemment port sur les attributs de son pre, qui aurait pu tre facilement amen tuer Abel. Dans une autre maldiction du serpent, Dieu a fait une prdiction, dans probablement l'une des prophties les plus importants de la Bible: Et je mettrai inimiti entre toi et la femme, entre ta postrit et sa postrit: celle-ci t'crasera la tte, et tu lui blesseras le talon. Gense 3:15 (LSG) Le verset est un peu complexe, divis en deux parties. Tout d'abord, il prcise les graines (ou descendants) du serpent sera en inimiti avec les graines d'Eve. La semence du serpent ferait en une seule ligne, Adam pur, graine entire dans un autre. La deuxime partie tait tout simplement une prdiction sur

YAHUSHA Ben Yosef CHRIST alias luimme, et comment il (un membre de la semence d'Eve) finirait par craser la tte du serpent, mais les membres de la semence du serpent ne serait en mesure de le briser par le talon de Jsus. En d'autres termes, par le crucifier sur la croix, il y aurait des descendants du serpent qui ne serait en mesure de le briser par Jsus le talon, mais YAHUSHA allait devenir victorieux la fin. En se relevant d'entre les morts, YAHUSHA irait l'encontre maldiction du serpent de la mort sur le monde, et de rectifier la maldiction de la mort d'Adam et Eve a apport au monde -

il craserait le pouvoir du serpent, ou la tte. Si YAHUSHA tait de la vraie semence d'Adam et Eve, que la Bible dit clairement, alors cette prophtie se raliserait sur sa mort, son ensevelissement et sa rsurrection. Les graines du serpent, tout au long de l'histoire, possderait une inimiti avec la ligne de sang qui conduirait YAHUSHA et ses enseignements partir de l. Si Can (et probablement d'autres) avait en effet le sang (ou graines) du serpent, ses descendants seraient, naturellement, d'tre dans les bras contre tout ce qui est vraiment, purement, de Jsus et de God.Those qui

ont du sang de l' serpent et d'autres anges dchus qui vont former ce qu'on a appel multitudes mixtes." Le conflit entre la morale, les croyances religieuses et les modes de vie de ces groupes mixtes ne cesse opposer ceux qui descendent d'Adam jusqu' ce jour, pour les raisons ci-dessus. Cela irait former l'un des conflits les plus importants de l'histoire humaine: ... les membres de la multitude mixte sont les enfants du serpent primordial qui a sduit Chavah (Eve) par l'arbre de la connaissance, de sorte que la multitude mixte est en effet l'impuret que le serpent injecte dans Chavah. De cette impuret, qui est considr comme le

peuple mlang, Kayin (Cain) sortit et tua Hevel (Abel) ... (6) Le Zohar, 2 Beresheet a28 Il ya plus propos de ces multitudes mixtes, et comment leurs penses, attitudes et modes de vie, se rapportent Adam, Jsus, et cette prophtie de la Bible. Nous allons dcouvrir comment Can et d'autres serpent-graines ont commenc influencer le monde en voie de Can. Tout d'abord, pour mieux comprendre comment la vie a t vcue l'poque du patriarche Can, voir Oiseaux et btes. Il ya une vidence beaucoup plus ancienne pour tayer

cette affirmation de ligne de Can, ainsi que leurs attributs, dans le prochain livre, The Rise of Mystery Babylone. Notes: (1) Le Midrash Rabbah, Brchit (Gense) 24:6, trad. Rabbin Dr. H. Freedman et Maurice Simon (Londres: The Soncino Press, 1961). (2) Strong H3045 - bla, http://www.blueletterbible. org / lang / lexique / lexicon.cfm? Strong H3045 = & t = LSG (consult le 11 aot 2010). (3) Strong H853 - eth, http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexi con/lexicon.

cfm? Strongs = H853 & t = LSG (consult le 11 aot 2010). (4) Targum Pseudo-Jonathan (Targum de la Palestine / Targum de Jonathan Ben Uziel), Le Livre de la Gense, chapitre 4, Berashith, http://targum. info/pj/pjgen1-6.htm (consult le 2 octobre 2009). (5) Le Zohar, tome 13, Pekoudei, article 21. Plastron et Efod, 203, https://www2.kabbalah.com/k/index. php / p = zohar / zohar & vol = 26 & sec = 912 (consult le 24 fvrier 2010). (6) Le Zohar, tome 1, Beresheet A, chapitre 28. Hevel-Moshe, 285,

www2.kabbalah.com/k/index.php/p = zohar / zohar & vol = 2 & sec = 49 (consult le 24 fvrier 2010).

Copyright 2012, Brett T., Tous droits rservs