SBPqO

Page 1

N Inscrio:

N Trabalho: 1549
Categoria: Scio Aspirante Modalidade:

Nome: Lucas Hian da Silva

rea Relacionada: 5 - Materiais Dentrios

Descritores: Cermica, Resistncia ao Cisalhamento, Cimentos de Resina

New Shear Bond Strength Methodology for Adhesion Testing

Silva LH*, Bergoli CD, Borges ALS, Tango RN, Cesar PF Biomateriais e Biologia Oral - Faculdade De Odontologia - FOUSP. Tel.: 45578584. E-mail: cdhian@gmail.com Shear bond strength tests (SBST) are heavily criticized due to inhomogeneous stress distribution (SD) that invalidate the final result. The objective was to compare the bond strength (BS) obtained by a new SBST with the conventional SBST to verify, also using Finite Element Analysis (FEA), if changing specimen geometry causes more homogeneous SD. A resin composite (Z250) was bonded to yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (YTZP) using a resin cement (Relyx). Each new SBST specimen was formed by two bonded blocks with a notch at the thinner side (adhesive surface). Adhesive surfaces had their roughness standardized and verified under perfilometry (Kruskal-Wallis; =0.05). New SBST used a customized specimen holder and the conventional SBST used an orthodontic wire. FEA was used to assess stress distribution. Elastic constants were obtained by sonic resonance to feed the FEA. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukeys test (=0.05), and failure modes were determined. Mean BS for both tests (conventional: 15.49.0 MPa; new: 11.73.0 MPa) were not significantly different (p=0.409). FEA showed more homogeneous SD at adhesion surfaces of both substrates for the new SBST and, most importantly, no bending stresses were noted. Failure types for both tests were mostly cohesive in the cement. However, two samples of the new SBST showed fractures evolving to cohesive failures of the resin composite. The results indicated that the new SBTS is promising for BS evaluation, since it showed similar BS and better SD compared to the conventional test. Further improvements to the new SBTS are necessary to overcome the occurrence of cohesive failure. (Apoio: FAPs - FAPESP. N 2012/10955-5)

http://www.sbpqo.org.br/resumo_print.asp?cod_res=1549&ingles=

4/29/2013 11:11:17 PM

NEWSHEARBONDSTRENGTHMETHODOLOGY FORADHESIONTESTING
Silva LH, Bergoli CD2, Borges ALS3, Tango RN3, Cesar PF1
2012/10955-5
lucashian@usp.br
1 Departamento de Biomateriais e Biologia Oral/ Universidade de So Paulo FOUSP - USP - Campus de So Paulo SP 2 Disciplina de Ocluso/ Universidade Federal de Pelotas - UFPel - Campus de Pelotas RS 3 Departamento de Materiais Odontolgicos e Prtese / Universidade Estadual Paulista UNESP - Campus de So Jos dos Campos SP

INTRODUCTIONandOBJECTIVE

MATERIALSandMETHODS
New Design
9 mm 2 mm 7 mm 3.5 mm thick

Shear bond strength tests (SBST) are heavily criticized due to inhomogeneous stress distribution that invalidate the final result. The objective was to compare the bond strength obtained by a new SBST with the conventional SBST to verify, also using Finite Element Analysis (FEA), if changing specimen geometry causes more homogeneous SD.

Finite Element Analysis

Adhesive Area 7 mm2

Y-TZP Resin composite Resin cement Cemented specimen specimen Specimen

Test simulation

Conventional SBST specimen

Elastic constants measurement

New design specimens fabrication

Bar-shaped materials Sonic resonance specimens test

Teflon matrix

Y-TZP Resin composite specimens specimen

Luting procedure

Cemented specimens

Adhesive surface analysis

Ceramic surface

Shear bond strength test

Profilometer

Resin composite surface

n=5
Specimen holder New design test Conventional SBST specimen Conventional SBST test

RESULTS

Finite Element Analysis

Conventional SBST

New design SBST

MPS in Y-TZP

MPS in resin cement (Y-TZP side)

MPS in resin composite

Shear stresses in Y-TZP

Shear stresses resin cement (Y-TZP side)

Shear stresses resin cement (resin side)

Deformation analysis

Elastic constants
Material YTZP Resin Cement Resin Composite E(GPa) Poisson

Shear bond strength test

Groups(n=3) SBS(MPa) New design 11.7 3.0 Conventional 15.4 9.0
ANOVA p=0.409

Failure mode analysis

Stereomicroscope
Y-TZP

Scanning electron microscopy

210.0 0.30 14.5 21.3 0.25 0.22

Conventional

Groups(n=3) Ravalues(nm) KruskalNew design 612.4 158.3 Wallis Conventional 316.7 43.2 p=0.05

Surface roughness (Ra)

New design

Resin Composite

New design

Conventional

CONCLUSION

New design

The results indicated that the new SBTS is promising for BS evaluation, since it showed similar BS and better SD compared to the conventional test. Further improvements to the new SBTS are necessary to overcome the occurrence of cohesive failure.