56 views

Uploaded by Jack Mcgrath

QUT file 3

- Chapter 2
- 00b7d528e98639b27c000000
- Discrete 2
- Methodology
- holy prob
- Poisson_v1-2
- sdlkjsdlkjsdlkjsdlkjsdlkjsdlkjsdlkj
- Ideal Observer Analysis
- 12519.ppt
- An Inventory System with Retrial Demands and Working Vacation
- Exponential Distribution
- Statistics
- hw7_sol
- (Rsc Analytical Spectroscopy Momographs) M. J. Adams-Chemometrics in Analytical Spectroscopy -Royal Society of Chemistry (1995)
- MIT15 075JF11 Exam01 Soln
- 1404.1178
- ch2.ans.oht
- Failure Rate Calculation Note
- Probability
- LO_Unit2_ProbabilityAndDistributions.pdf

You are on page 1of 16

A laboratory blood test is 95% eective in detecting a certain disease when it is, in

fact, present. However, the test also yields a false positive result for 1% of the

healthy people tested. If 0.5% of the population actually has the disease, what is the

probability a person has the disease given that the test was positive? Dene the events:

D: the tested person has the disease

E: the test result is positive

What do we want to compute? P(D|E)

From the problem statement, what do we know about the probabilities?

P(E|D) = 0.95, P(E|D

c

) = 0.01 P(D) = 0.005 P(D

c

) = 0.995

Using the above, we can solve for the desired probability by applying Bayes Rule:

P(D|E) =

P(E|D)P(D)

P(E|D)P(D) +P(E|D

c

)P(D

c

)

=

(0.95)(0.005)

(0.95)(0.005) + (0.01)(0.995)

0.323

So only 32% of those people whose test results are positive actually have the disease!

1

2. Suppose that of the potential new patients that call up a medical clinic, only 60%

are able to immediately speak to someone. The other 40% leave a message with their

phone numbers, in which case 75% of the time their call is returned the same day,

while 25% of the time it is returned the following day.

Data indicates that the probability that a caller will visit the clinic is 80% if their call

was picked up immediately, whereas it is 60% if the call was returned the same day,

and 40% if it was returned the following day.

For the following problems, simplify it as much as possible but your nal answer does

not have to be a single number

(a) (20pts) What is the probability that a random caller will visit the clinic?

Dene the events:

V : the event that a caller visits the clinic

I: the event that a caller spoke to someone immediately

S: the event that a caller had their call returned the same day

F: the event that a caller had their call returned the following day

From the problem statement, we have that for those who spoke to someone im-

mediately:

P(I) = 0.60 P(V |I) = 0.80

and for those who did not speak to someone immediately:

P(S|I

c

) = 0.75 P(F|I

c

) = 0.25

and

P(V |S I

c

) = 0.60 P(V |F I

c

) = 0.40

Using the denition of conditional probability we have that:

P(S I

c

) = P(S|I

c

)P(I

c

) = (0.75)(0.40)

P(F I

c

) = P(F|I

c

)P(I

c

) = (0.25)(0.40)

Using the law of total probability we therefore have that:

P(V ) = P(V |I)P(I) +P(V |S I

c

)P(S I

c

) +P(V |F I

c

)P(F I

c

)

= (0.80)(0.60) + (0.60)(0.75)(0.40) + (0.40)(0.25)(0.40)

= 0.70

2

(b) (5pts) Given that a caller visited the clinic, what is the probability that they

spoke to someone immediately when they called the clinic?

P(I|V ) =

P(V |I)P(I)

P(V )

=

(0.80)(0.60)

(0.80)(0.60) + (0.60)(0.75)(0.40) + (0.40)(0.25)(0.40)

= 0.686

3

3. An airline nds that 4 percent of the passengers that make reservations on a particular

ight will not show up. Consequently, their policy is to sell 100 reserved seats on a

plane that has only 98 seats. Find the probability that every person who shows up for

the ight will nd a seat available.

Let X count the number of passengers that show up. Then X is binomial (n =

100, p = 0.96) random variable. The probability that everybody who shows up has a

seat is:

P(X 98) = 1 P(X > 98)

= 1 P(X = 99) P(X = 100)

= 1

_

100

99

_

(0.96)

99

(0.04)

1

_

100

100

_

(0.96)

100

(0.04)

0

= 0.913

4

4. A buyer must decide whether or not to accept a large lot of items which, unknown

to him, contains 5% defectives. The lot will be accepted if there are only 0 or 1

defective items in a sample of 20 items randomly drawn from the lot. Calculate the

exact probability that the lot will be accepted.

Let X count the number of defectives in the 20 items sampled. Dene p = 0.05, then

X is a binomial(n = 20, p = 0.05) random variable, and the probability that the lot is

accepted is just:

P(X = 0) +P(X = 1) =

_

20

0

_

p

0

(1 p)

20

+

_

20

1

_

p

1

(1 p)

19

= P(X 1) = BINOMDIST(1, 20, 0.05, 1) = 0.736

5

5. Experience shows that 20% of the people reserving tables at a certain restaurant never

show up. If the restaurant has 30 tables and takes 32 reservations, use the Bernoulli

trials model to:

(a) determine the probability that the restaurant will be able to accomodate everyone.

We think of each person showing up or not as an independent Bernoulli trial

with probability of success p = 0.80. Since there are 32 reservations, we take

the number of trials to be n = 32. We can therefore model the number of people

showing up as a binomial random variable, X, with parameters (n = 32, p = 0.80).

The probability that the restaurant can accomodate everyone is thus:

P(X 30) = 1 P(X = 31) P(X = 32)

= 1

_

32

31

_

(0.80)

31

(0.20)

1

_

32

32

_

(0.80)

32

(0.20)

0

(b) Find the expected number of reservations that will be fullled.

This is the mean of a binomial r.v. with parameters (n = 32, p = 0.80):

E[X] = np = 32 0.80 = 25.6

6

6. Suppose that the number of accidents occurring on a highway each day is a Poisson

r.v with parameter = 3

(a) Find the probability that 3 or more accidents occur today (I want a number)

Let X count the number of accidents that occur. Then X is a Poisson r.v. with

parameter = 3.

P(X 3) = 1 P(X < 3)

= 1 P(X = 0) P(X = 1) P(X = 2)

= 1 e

3

3

0

0!

e

3

3

1

1!

e

3

3

2

2!

= 0.576

(b) Repeat part(a) under the assumption that at least 1 accident occurs today (again,

your answer should be a number)

P(X 3|X 1) =

P(X 3, X 1)

X 1

=

P(X 3)

P(X 1)

and:

P(X 1) = 1 P(X = 0) = 1 e

3

= 0.95

Thus:

P(X 3|X 1) =

0.576

0.95

= 0.607

7

7. The time (in minutes) until the next email arrives in your inbox is modeled as an

exponential random variable. It is observed that the probability that it takes more

than 2 minutes for the next email to arrive is exactly

3

5

the probability that it more

than 1 minute for it to arrive.

Given this information, nd the probability that it takes more than 4 minutes for the

next email to arrive.

Let X be the time until the next email arrives. We know that X is an exponential

random variable, but we do not know the parameter, , of the distribution. However,

we can solve for it from the relationship:

3

5

P(X > 1) = P(X > 2)

3

5

(1 P(X 1)) = 1 P(X 2)

3

5

e

= e

2

3

5

= e

ln

_

3

5

_

=

which yields that = ln

_

3

5

_

. Now, we can solve the problem:

P(X > 4) = 1 P(X 4) = e

4

= e

4 ln(

3

5

)

=

_

3

5

_

4

8

8. (20pts) Suppose that the weight of a person selected at random from some population

is normally distributed with parameters and . Suppose also that P(X 160) = 0.5

and P(X 140) = 0.25.

(a) (10pts) Find and

P(X 160) =

_

160

_

= 0.5

where () is the standard normal cdf. From Excel, we have that (0) = 0.5.

Therefore:

160

= 0

or = 160. We also have that:

P(X 140) =

_

140

_

=

_

140 160

_

= 0.25

Using Excel, we see that NORMSINV(0.25)=-0.67449. Therefore:

140 160

= 0.67449

We therefore obtain that = (140 160)/0.67449 = 29.65.

(b) (5pts) Find P(X 200).

_

200 160

29.65

_

= 1(1.35) = 10.9115 = 0.0885

9

(c) (5pts) Of all the people in the population weighing at least 200 pounds, what

percentage will weigh over 220 pounds?

P(X 220, X 200)

P(X 200)

=

P(X 220)

P(X 200)

=

1

_

220160

29.65

_

0.0885

=

1 (2.0236)

0.0885

1 0.9785

0.0885

= 0.243

10

9. (20pts) Suppose that the width of an item produced by a factory is normally distributed

with = 0.9000 and = 0.0030. The item is considered defective unless its width is

in the specication limits 0.9000 0.0050.

(a) (10pts) What percentage of items produced will be defective?

2

) with

= 0.9000 and = 0.0030.

An item is defective if X < 0.90000.0050 = 0.0050 or X > 0.9000+0.0050 =

0.0050. The probability that a random item is defective is thus:

P(X < 0.0050) +P(X > + 0.0050)

= P(X < 0.0050) + 1 P(X + 0.0050)

=

_

0.0050

_

+ 1

_

+ 0.0050

_

=

_

0.0050

_

+ 1

_

0.0050

_

= 2

_

1

_

0.0050

__

since (x) = 1 (x)

= 2

_

1

_

5

3

__

= 2(1 0.95221) = 0.095581

where the excel function NORMSDIST(

5

3

) was used to evaluate the standard

normal cdf.

The percentage of defective items is just the probability that a randomly selected

item is defective, so the answer is 9.5581 %.

(b) What is the maximum allowable value of that will permit no more than 1 in

100 defectives when the widths are normally distributed with = 0.9000 and ?

We want to determine the maximum value of such that this inequaility holds:

1

100

= 0.01 2

_

1

_

0.0050

__

The larger , is the more likely the item will be defective ( is a measure of

variability, so increasing it will increase the probability of the width being larger

than the specication limits), so the maximum value of is the one that satises:

0.01 =2

_

1

_

0.0050

__

Rewrite this as:

_

0.0050

_

= 1 (0.01/2) = 0.995

11

then use the Excel function NORMSINV(0.995) which yields 2.5758. Set this

equal to 0.005/ and solve for to obtain that:

= 0.005/2.5758 = 0.001941

This is the maximum allowable standard deviation for the width of the items

produced if we want no more than 1% of them to be defective.

12

10. (20pts) The gross weekly sales at a certain restaurant is a normal random variable

with mean $2200 and standard deviation $230. Assume the gross sales in each week

are independent of the sales in any other week.

For this problem, it is not necessary to provide a numerical answer. However, to get

full credit, be sure to dene any symbols, variables, or random variables you introduce

such that I could get a numerical answer with a calculator or computer within a few

seconds

(a) (10pts) What is the probability that the total gross sales over the next 2 weeks

exceeds $5000?

The sum of 2 independent normal random variables is itself a normal random

variable with mean

1

+

2

and variance

2

1

+

2

2

. In this case

1

=

2

= $2200

and

1

=

2

= $230. Let X N(4400, 2(230

2

)) be the total gross sales for the

next 2 weeks. The probability that total gross sales for the next 2 weeks exceeds

$5000 is then given by:

P(X > 5000) = 1 P(X 5000)

= 1

_

5000 4400

2(230)

_

= 1 (1.844)

= 0.0325

(b) (10pts) What is the probability that weekly sales exceed $2000 in at least 2 of the

next 3 weeks?

Let Y N(2200, 230

2

) be the sales for a given week. Dene p by:

p = P(Y > 2000) = 1 P(Y 2000) = 1

_

2000 2200

230

_

= 0.808

Now let W count the number of times sales exceeds $2000 in the next 3 weeks:

W is a binomial(n = 3, p) random variable. We want the probability that that

weekly sales exceed $2000 in at least 2 of the next 3 weeks. This is equivalent to:

P(W 2) = P(W = 2) +P(W = 3)

=

_

3

2

_

p

2

(1 p)

1

+

_

3

3

_

p

3

(1 p)

0

= 0.9033

13

11. (20pts) One has 100 light bulbs whose lifetimes are independent exponential random

variables with mean 5 hours. If the bulbs are used one at a time, with a failed bulb

being immediately replaced by a new one, what is the probability that there is still a

working bulb after 525 hours?

Note that if X

i

is an exponential random variable with mean 5 hours, we know that

= 1/5 = 0.20. We want to determine

P(X

1

+X

2

+ X

100

525)

that is, the probability that the sum of the lifetimes of all 100 bulbs is at least 525

hours. In terms of the sample mean S

100

=

100

i=1

X

i

/100, this is just:

P(100 S

100

525) = P(S

100

5.25)

Since the light bulbs are used independently, and assuming that n = 100 is large

enough, we can invoke the central limit theorem and approximate the probability with

the standard normal cdf:

P

_

S

n

E[S

n

]

_

Var(S

n

)

a

_

(a)

In our case, E[S

n

] = 5 and Var(S

n

) = Var(X

i

)/n = 5

2

/n = 25/n, where n = 100. We

then have that:

P(S

100

5.25) =

_

5.25 5

_

25/100

_

= (0.50)

Therefore:

P(X

1

+X

2

+ X

100

525) = 1 (0.5) = 0.3085

14

12. From past experience a professor knows that the test score of a student taking his nal

examination is a random variable with mean 75 and variance 25. Use the central limit

theorem to determine how many students would have to take the examination so as to

ensure, with probability at least 0.90, that the class average would be within 5 of 75.

Let S

n

=

n

i=1

X

i

/n. In our case E[S

n

] = 75 and Var(S

n

) = 25/n.

We use the Central Limit Approximation, such that:

P

_

S

n

E[S

n

]

_

Var(S

n

)

a

_

(a)

where S

n

N(75, 25/n). The average of the class is dened to be S

n

= (X

1

+X

2

+

+X

n

)/n, and we want to nd n such that:

P(70 < S

n

80) 0.90

We can rewrite this as:

P(S

n

80) P(S

n

70) 0.90

In terms of the standard normal cdf, this is just:

P(S

n

80) P(S

n

70) =

_

80 75

_

25/n

_

_

70 75

_

25/n

_

= (

n) (

n) = 2(

n) 1

We want to nd n such that this is at least 0.90. To nd the minimum n, set the

probability to 0.90:

2(

n) 1 = 0.90

so

n =

_

1

(0.95)

2

= [NORMSINV(0.95)]

2

= 2.7

so the professor needs at least 3 students to take the exam.

15

13. A change in the manufacturing process of steel beams is suggested. The manufacturer

wants to know if the mean strength of the beams made by a new process is dierent

from the 42,000 psi, which is the mean strength of the beams made by the present pro-

cess. A two-sided hypothesis test on is appropriate to answer this question. Breaking

strengths are measured for a test sample of n = 32 beams made by the new process.

The sample mean for this test sample is x = 42, 196 psi and the sample standard devi-

ation is s = 500 psi. Assume that the observations are normally distributed and that

the sample size is large enough such that s . At the 10% level of signicance, test

the hypothesis that:

H

0

: = 42, 000 vs H

1

: = 42, 000

Proceed in three dierent ways:

(a) Calculate the z-statistic:

z =

x

0

/

n

=

42196 42000

500/

32

= 2.217

For = 0.10, we compare this to the critical value z

/2

= NORMSINV(0.95) =

1.645. Since |z| > z

0.05

, we reject H

0

and conclude that the mean breaking

strength of the beam made by the new process is dierent. (in fact, the test

indicates it is larger).

(b) Calculate the p-value.

p = 2(1 (|z|)) = 2(1 NORMSDIST(|z|)) = 2(1 0.987) = 0.026

Since p < , reject H

0

.

(c) Compute a 90% condence interval:

_

x z

/2

n

_

=

_

42, 196 1.645

_

500

32

__

= [42051, 42341]

Since

0

does not fall in the CI, we reject H

0

16

- Chapter 2Uploaded byMcNemar
- 00b7d528e98639b27c000000Uploaded byPiyushGarg
- Discrete 2Uploaded bypreetesh
- MethodologyUploaded bySujan Maharjan
- holy probUploaded byOmji Pandey
- Poisson_v1-2Uploaded byAnkush Gandhi
- sdlkjsdlkjsdlkjsdlkjsdlkjsdlkjsdlkjUploaded bySteven Hou
- Ideal Observer AnalysisUploaded byDonald Anderson
- 12519.pptUploaded byShe Ryll Shang
- An Inventory System with Retrial Demands and Working VacationUploaded byIJSRP ORG
- Exponential DistributionUploaded byAhmar Niazi
- StatisticsUploaded byShraddha Durgan
- hw7_solUploaded byDylan Ler
- (Rsc Analytical Spectroscopy Momographs) M. J. Adams-Chemometrics in Analytical Spectroscopy -Royal Society of Chemistry (1995)Uploaded byciborg1978
- MIT15 075JF11 Exam01 SolnUploaded bymihai37
- 1404.1178Uploaded byakhi_15a
- ch2.ans.ohtUploaded byFelipe Chávez Bustamante
- Failure Rate Calculation NoteUploaded bychem_ta
- ProbabilityUploaded bybestdudearound
- LO_Unit2_ProbabilityAndDistributions.pdfUploaded byPuthpura Puth
- 01408184Uploaded bysophiaaa
- Calculation and Modelling of Radar Performance 9 Clutter Simulation TechniquesUploaded bymmhorii
- 2013-Martins Et AlUploaded bythigm85
- chap18.pdfUploaded byDanson Lee
- Lec2_CDFEDFUploaded bySiva Tarun Pikkili
- Sol1.pdfUploaded byliz
- Js LyonetiUploaded byAyaz Ahmed
- 1exy4Uploaded byTong Qiu
- Smart Mirror ReportUploaded bycanberk
- MATHS SA. 2008 SAJC H2 Mathematics Prelim Paper 2Uploaded byglenlcy

- MAB210 Worksheet 03 SolutionsUploaded byJack Mcgrath
- MAB210 Worksheet 03Uploaded byJack Mcgrath
- MAB210 Worksheet 04Uploaded byJack Mcgrath
- MAB210 Worksheet 04 SolutionsUploaded byJack Mcgrath
- X Solution2Uploaded byJack Mcgrath
- MAB210 Section 03 Lecture NotesUploaded byJack Mcgrath
- MAB210 Assignment 2(1)Uploaded byJack Mcgrath
- MAB210 Section 03 ScribblesUploaded byJack Mcgrath
- MAB210 Section 04 Lecture NotesUploaded byJack Mcgrath

- Chapter 1Uploaded bymariapa_268
- 120CAssign1W17Uploaded bySandesh Shalavadi
- Engineering Mathematics - IITUploaded byVijay Kumar
- 2010 H2 Statistics) Binomial and Poisson DistributionsUploaded byKritika Sengar
- Mil Std 105dUploaded bynerycampos
- Unmarked an R packageUploaded byMichael Havelock
- Lecture 11 Poisson Process Exponential Erlang Gamma DistributionsUploaded byLemale Stanly
- Probability_SyllabusUploaded byomkar_puri5277
- UNIT II Probability ProblemsUploaded byAbhijeet Tripathi
- chapter4.pptUploaded byAnonymous ecgeyhV
- Count Trip Generation ModelsUploaded byKoti Reddy Allu
- Extremes 2Uploaded byGiancarlos Castillo Oviedo
- Tutorial Question Probability DistributionUploaded byniwa
- Chapter4B_handout.pdfUploaded byjayc11
- Old Math 478 Exam 3Uploaded bysweetindianboy111
- GARP FRM Practice Exams - 2007.pdfUploaded byLe Dinh Nhat Thuyen
- Basic Probability Exam PacketUploaded byPerficmsfit
- Doane Chapter 06Uploaded byThomasMCarter
- 93839597 Probability DistributionUploaded byKaito Kuroba
- fstats_ch3Uploaded byFawad Ali Khan
- CASIO 991 EX and STATISTICSUploaded byMuhammad Asad Ali
- Solutions to Problems (4-7)Uploaded bywife_of_itachi
- Practice Problems - Set 2Uploaded byashwinagrawal198231
- Count Data Models in SASUploaded byAlvaro Zapata
- Recitation 2006Uploaded bygs2002us
- IB Maths worksheet ProbabilityUploaded byhans
- Business Statistics_Discrete Probability DistributionUploaded byMarco Daccarett
- Presentation Seminar PDMAUploaded byimmsilvam
- Mayer and Price - Unilateral Presidential PowersUploaded byredaer24
- B.tech ME - Or I Semester (R07) Regular Examinations,NOVEMBER 2Uploaded byRajesh Guntur