Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. Quality of direction and guidance from your Agency? Did they have a CT
Strategy? Do they?
3. How would you assess the quality of US - GoC relations on intelligence and law
enforcement?
4. How would you assess the quality of information sharing from Washington and
US? In the embassy (Are there redundant functions?)? From other locations?
6. Describe your role and any tasking? Process? Can you task your Agency?
Others?
8. Reporting? Warning?
Ground Rules for Interviews
Q. Who Are These People and Why Are They Visiting Us?
A. As part of its mandate to investigate the events that led to the terrorist
attacks upon the United States on September 11, 2001 and to recommend
policy changes that increase the safety of all Americans, the National
Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States is sending
members of its staff to consult with appropriate Canadian officials.
2. Quality of direction and guidance from your Agency? Did they have a CT
Strategy? Do they?
3. How would you assess the quality of US - GoC relations on intelligence and law
enforcement?
4. How would you assess the quality of information sharing from Washington and
US? In the embassy? From other locations?
6. Describe your role and any tasking? Process? Can you task your Agency?
Others?
8. Reporting? Warning? \
WITH DRAWAL NOTICE
RG: 148
Box: 00001 Folder: 0001 Document: 15
Series: Team 2 Files
Copies: 1 Pages: 1
ACCESS RESTRICTED
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:
In the review of this file this item was removed because access to it is
restricted. Restrictions on records in the National Archives are stated in
general and specific record group restriction statements which are available
for examination.
NND: 361
Withdrawn: 10-06-2008 by:
1. What is the GoC perception of the Terrorist threat? What is their approach to CT
at home and abroad? Do you think there are any lessons for the US in their
approach?
4. How would you assess the quality of the guidance/direction you receive from
Washington from various agencies?
5. How would you assess the quality of the US - Canadian intelligence and law
enforcement relationships?
6. How would you assess the commitment of the GoC in support of US CT efforts at
home and abroad?
7. How is the border security? Has there been progress? What are our/their future
concerns?
LEGAT
2. Quality of direction and guidance from your Agency? Did they have a CT
Strategy? Do they?
3. How would you assess the quality of US - GoC relations on intelligence and law
enforcement?
4. How would you assess the quality of information sharing from Washington and
US? In the embassy (Are there redundant functions?)? From other locations?
6. Describe your role and any tasking? Process? Can you task your Agency?
Others?
8. Reporting? Warning?
UNCLASSIFIED / COMMISSION SENSITIVE
THANK YOU.
GORDON
• Department of Finance
[WILL BE SUPPLIED BY TEAM 4 ON FRIDAY -1 TALKED TO SERENA
ON THURSDAY ABOUT IT]
CSE
> How is CSE tasked, and how does CSE balance between defense and 'national'
priorities?
> What priority is counterterrorism for CSE?
> Who conducts all-sources analysis using information acquired by CSE?
> What is the relationship between CSE and other parts of the Canadian
government such as Canadian intelligence?
> How is CSE responding to the increasing complexity and multiplicity of
telecommunications media? ^^ ^
> How does CSE cooperate with WSMs and other partners?
> What laws govern CSE operations domestically? -4"A-~~-as!Uvx^-^ «J2^o^C,^^.
<v . ' '
RCMP
> Why did Canada separate law enforcement from domestic intelligence?
> What priority is counterterrorism for the RCMP?
> Does the RCMP have a strategy for counterterrorism?
> Does the RCMP conduct strategic analysis, and if so, how? What is the history
of the RCMP's intelligence unit, including why the RCMP recently
reconstituted it?
> What is RCMP's relationship with CSIS and with the rest of the Canadian
national government?
> In the U.S., there is a debate about whether the FBI's law enforcement culture
and posture can be changed to a more prevention-oriented culture; does the
RCMP face similar questions regarding its law-enforcement-oriented culture?
> What is the RCMP's relationship to non-national governmental entities?
> What is the nature of the RCMP's cooperation with U.S. law enforcement?
sJ^
UNCLASSIFIED / COMMISSION SENSITIVE
> Who has the responsibility, authority, and accountability for counterterrorism in
the Canadian government in general and Canadian intelligence in particular?
> Why did Canada separate law enforcement from domestic intelligence?
> Does the rise of transnational threats such as terrorism and proliferation
necessitate fundamental changes in government organization and functioning?
> What is the nature of Canadian intelligence's liaison relationship with the U.S.?
> What is the mechanism by which the Prime Minister sets priorities for Canadian
intelligence, and how often are those priorities updated?
> How does the Prime Minister conduct oversight of Canadian intelligence?
> How does the Prime Minister ensure that Canadian intelligence is devoting
resources to the Prime Minister's priorities?
> What is the Agency's strategy for border security, and how does the Agency
balance border security with the need to ensure efficient transit of cargo?
> How does the Agency cooperate with other parts of the Canadian government
and particularly Canadian intelligence - concerning counterterrorism?
> How does the Agency cooperate with U.S. government institutions such as the
Customs Service?
How does the Agency interact with the private sector, both U.S. and Canadian?
Department of Finance
1. To what extent, if any, is Al Qaeda raising funds in Canada today? Has this
fundraising decreased/increased since 9/11? Why or why not?
2. Before 9/11 how much of a focus on terrorist financing was there at the
Department of Finance?
a. Specific entities or programs dedicated to terror finance (either in Finance
or elsewhere)?
b. Examples of specific pre-9/11 disruptions/prosecutions regarding terrorist
finance?
4. Pre 9/11 was the Department of Finance involved in the process to set counter
terrorist policy? Post 9/11?
5. What is the process by which Canada can freeze assets of a terrorist entity?
a. Level of proof necessary?
b. Ability to use classified information?
c. Any legal challenges?
d. What is your view of the US process to designate entities for asset
freezes?
6. What legal tools exist in Canada to ensure that its financial system is not used
to move terrorist funds?
a. How does Canada regulate charities to prevent the funding of terrorist
organizations? Mosques?
b. How does Canada regulate hawala and other informal value transfer
mechanisms?
8. Are you satisfied with the level of cooperation between the USG and Canada
on counter-terrorist financing?
a. What can the US do to make it easier for you to cooperate with the US in
tracking or disrupting terrorist financing?
CSE
> How is CSE tasked, and how does CSE balance between defense and 'national'
priorities?
> What is the relationship between CSE and other parts of the Canadian
government such as Canadian intelligence?
> How does CSE cooperate with the U.S. and other partners?
> What laws govern CSE operations domestically? Information sharing with
provincial and local authorities.
> Are there limitations on DND's role domestically that are akin to the U.S. posse
commitatus act, which limits the U.S. Department of Defense's role in domestic
law enforcement?
> Does the DND conduct its own analysis of counterterrorism-related intelligence
information?
Is the DND's focus solely on force protection, or does it have a more 'national'
focus as well?
> What is DND's relationship to U.S. DOD and NORAD and NORTHCOM and
DHS vis-a-vis the counterterrorism mission?
CSIS
> Why did Canada separate law enforcement from domestic intelligence?
> What is CSIS's relationship with the RCMP and with the rest of the Canadian
national government?
RCMP
> Why did Canada separate law enforcement from domestic intelligence?
> Does the RCMP conduct strategic analysis, and if so, how? What is the history
of the RCMP's intelligence unit, including why the RCMP recently
reconstituted it?
> What is RCMP's relationship with CSIS and with the rest of the Canadian
national government?
In the U.S., there is a debate about whether the FBI's law enforcement culture
and posture can be changed to a more prevention-oriented culture; does the
RCMP face similar questions regarding its law-enforcement-oriented culture?
> What is the nature of the RCMP's cooperation with U.S. law enforcement?
> What is the Committee's jurisdiction and history, and what are the rules for
membership? What staff support does the Committee receive?
How does the Committee relate to other committees with jurisdiction over parts
of the Canadian government concerned with national and homeland security?
What are the mechanisms by which the Committee conducts oversight of the
Canadian intelligence apparatus?
> Does Foreign Affairs conduct its own strategic analysis of terrorism?
> Does Foreign Affairs task Canadian intelligence for support, and how does it
evaluate the support it receives?
Does Foreign Affairs have a relationship with the U.S. State Department's
Bureau of Intelligence and Research and/or Ambassador-at-Large for
Counterterrorism?
> Please provide an overview of Canadian immigration programs that are the most
likely portals for terrorists to enter Canada.
Does Canada have a terrorist watchlist, and what is that watchlist's relationship
to the U.S. government's watchlist?
What is the nature of your relationship with the U.S. Dept. of Homeland
Security on immigration issues?
INBOX Compose Folders Options Search Problem? Help Addressbook Tasks Memos Calendar Logout Open Folder'
Steve:
(1) Kevin scheid has shared with the Canada desk (McCulla) a memo detailing
lines of questioning (a) for the USG and (b) for Canadian authorities.
(2) staffdel did request to visit Canadian facilities, but that is a request
not a demand, it is always useful to visit with folks on their home turf, if
in the view of Canadian authorities and the Embassy that is too hard, then
please proceed with Privy Council meetings.
(3) in a separate note, you will have seen Ground Rules, as revised in response
to the Canadian counterdraft.
(4) Attached please find press guidance. (Al, thanks for your help)
Delete | Reply | Reply to All | Forward | Redirect | Blacklist | Message Source | Resume | Save as | Print Back to INBOX <31>
Move | Copy (This message to 1~\4