Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and
s
λs + 2µs
(1.3) c1 = ,
ρs
respectively. I also found that confined disturbance energy governed by the divergence-
free part of the Navier-Cauchy equation, creates a second order tensor T, the stress
energy tensor, given by
e Sx /c Sy /c Sz /c
Sx /c −σxx −σxy −σxz
(1.4) Tαβ = Sy /c −σyx −σyy −σyz .
the irrotational part of Navier-Cauchy equation (1.1) with ü set to zero to find the
deformation
1
(1.8) (λs + 2µs ) grad div u = 3 grad e.
If we choose to set the displacement vector, u, like zero in the undeformed space,
i.e. the space outside the confined energy, then both div u and e are falling down
to zero outside the volume, V , were the radiation energy is confined, so Equation
(1.8) can be solved
e
(1.9) div u = .
3(λs + 2µs )
The physical meaning of (1.8) is that the outwards directed force caused by the
confined radiation energy, e, is counteracted by an inwards directed force caused
by the gradient of the displacement. The grad div u-field represents the force that
keeps the radiation at bay. The deduction above, however, does not prove that the
radiation has got to be confined (the reason for that must be sought elsewhere),
only that if there is a certain amount of confined energy, then there has got to be
a displacement that sets up an exact balance of forces between the expanding force
of the confined energy and the gradient of the pressure in space. Moreover, from
the divergence theorem
I Z
(1.10) (A · n) df = div A dV
V V
we can infer that the displacement is independent of how densely the energy is
distributed in space; a certain amount of confined energy will always displace the
same amount of the spatial continuum regardless of how it is distributed. Hence the
total displacement from a volume of space where an amount of disturbance energy,
E, is confined is given by
E
(1.11) D= .
3(λs + 2µs )
1.2. The expanding spatial continuum. The spatial continuum can be consid-
ered to behave like being confined in a huge spherical container with receding walls
moving outwards with some constant – or nearly constant – speed V , such that the
space it occupies expands in all directions. The radius of the container is given by
R = V T where T is the age of the universe since it was born in the Big Bang. If
the expansion is uniform, then a nearby point to an observer is moving outwards
with a speed given by
r
v= = rH,
T
where
def 1
(1.12) H =
T
is known as Hubble’s constant. In this model it is not a constant at all, but in the
course of a short time span at a cosmic scale, it can all the same be considered
constant. We can also take the time derivative of H and acquire
1
(1.13) Ḣ = − 2 = −H 2 ,
T
which is an extremely small quantity.
4 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN
where b = − 13 grad e is a measure of the effect of the confined energy, see (1.7).
If the time derivative of div u is zero, there will be no divergence of u outside the
confined energy because the two leftover terms will cancel out. Hence it is necessary
to introduce a small additional component, uε , to take care of the effect of the time
dependent term. By (1.15) we obtain:
2ρs eH 2
(1.16) ∇2 ( div uε ) = .
3(λs + 2µs )2
I now define some new terms: First a new variable Φ(x) given by:
c2def
(1.17) Φ(x) = − div uε ,
2
next the matter density %(x) (without an index) that is related to e(x) through the
relation:
def
e(x) = %(x)c2 ,
and finally the constant
def ρs c4 H 2
(1.18) G = .
12π(λs + 2µs )2
With these properties inserted Equation (1.16) takes the form
(1.19) ∇2 Φ = −4πG%.
We notice that G can be interpreted as the gravitational constant2, Φ as the
gravitational potential, and % as the mass density of the confined energy. Then
Equation (1.19) is an exact match of the classical equation for the Newton potential.
This Poisson’s equation can be solved under rather general condition, so if %(r0 ) is
a function of the radius vector r0 , then Φ(r) at the position r is given by the well
known relation
Z
%(r0 )dv 0
Φ(r) = G ,
|r − r0 |
where dv 0 is a small volume element around the position r0 and the integration is
taken over the whole space. If the total mass equivalence is defined as
Z
M= % dV,
V
2In fact G is not a constant, but a function of H. Both are, however, functions of T −1 where
T is supposed to be very great, hence the variation of G in the course of any time of observation
is extremely small.
6 BJØRN URSIN KARLSEN
space itself, namely a varying c. The force only enters the picture when a body is
hindered from moving freely, so the force of gravity is the force needed to break the
acceleration down to zero. Elsewhere I have found that the force needed to give a
body an acceleration of a is given by
(3.1) F = Ma
which also follows from Equation (2.4).
3.1. The attraction between two bodies of confined energy. First we have
got to find out how the wave speed, c, varies with compression of the spatial con-
tinuum. The question is not quite trivial. In another paper, Spatial continuum
mechanics [2], I have addressed this question from two points of view. One that
the spatial continuum has an intrinsic mass density that only changes when a vol-
ume element is compressed to a smaller volume, and the other that the spatial
continuum has no initial mass density at all and only gets its inertial properties
by the energy that goes into it by compression. Here I will only consider the first
alternative.
Let a volume element, V0 , be changed to a volume V = V0 + ∆V . Then we can
set up the relation:
ρs V0 = ρnew V,
1 1 V0 + ∆V
= ,
ρnew ρs V0
and multiply both sides with the property µs
µs µs ¡ ∆V ¢
= 1+ .
ρnew ρs V0
Then by the identity
∆V
lim = div u,
V0 →0 V0
and finally by taking the gradient on both sides of the equation, we obtain
1 2
(3.2) c grad c = 2 c0 grad div u, .
Now let us introduce a mass M1 into space, which generates a potential given
by Equation (1.20)
GM1 r
grad Φ = − .
r2 |r|
In this field at a distance r we introduce another test mass, M2 , which is kept from
moving and hence be acted upon with a force given by (3.1)
F21 = −M2 · c grad c.
Note that the force is acting on M2 and the radius vector is from M1 to M2 , hence
the negative sign. From (3.2) we get c grad c, and from (1.21) we get the value of
9
grad div u, and with these two properties inserted the mutual attraction between
the two bodies above becomes
F = M2 12 c02 grad div u
c02 2 GM1
= M2
2 c02 r2
M1 M2
F =G ,
r2
This is Newton’s equation for the attraction between two heavenly bodies and needs
no additional comments.
3.2. An estimate of the size of µs and ρs . Equation (1.18) puts us in position
to estimate the numerical value of µs and ρs . If we set λs = 2µs then according
to Equation (1.2) and (1.3) the velocity of longitudinal waves becomes the double
of transversal waves, which is a fairly reasonable estimate. By Equation (1.18) we
obtain
c2 H 2
µs = .
192πG
Newton’s gravitational constant G = 6.673 × 10−8 cm3 /g sec2 . The Hubble Space
Telescope Key Project Team has measured Hubble’s constant with an uncertainty
of 10 percent to3 H = 70 km s−1 Mpc−1 = 2.3 × 10−18 sec−1 . The speed of light
c = 3.0 × 1010 cm/sec. With these values inserted we obtain
µs ≈ 1.2 × 10−10 g cm−1 sec−2 ,
and by Equation (1.2) we finally acquire
ρs ≈ 1.3 × 10−31 g cm−3 ,
which is within the same order of magnitude as the estimated mean spatial density
of matter in the universe. It is tempting to assume that (ρs c2 ) represents the
mysterious dark energy. This becomes even more probable if space only gets its
inertia from being compressed [2].
References
1. Bjørn Ursin Karlsen, Elastodynamics in a Continuum of Infinite Extension.
2. , Spatial Continuum Mechanics, http://home.online.no/˜ukarlsen, 2000.
E-mail address: ukarlsen@online.no