Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recap:
Class #9 Syntax II
Recap
Recap:
What counts as a well-formed sentence is not dictated by what makes sense What counts as an ill-formed sentences is not dictated by what doesnt make sense
Recap:
Recap
S NP VP
NP
Fred the cat seven Peruvian llamas Samantha a feeling the strangest story that you ever did hear
VP
slept fed the dog tiptoed through the tulips left said that he thought that the weather was turning out better than expected kicked the bucket
Recap
S S NP NP NP PP NP VP S VP Det N N NP PP P NP
Ambiguous Sentences
The spy saw the cop with the binoculars.
(NP modifier rule) VP VP V saw (VP modifier rule) Det the NP N cop P with PP NP Det N the binoculars Det the V saw NP N cop P with VP NP PP NP Det N the binoculars
VP V NP VP V VP V S VP V S VP VP PP S Comp
Recap
Recap:
NP-modier VP
Recursion
A recursive rule is one which can be applied over and over again to its own output, resulting in infinite generative capacity
VP
VP
V saw
NP the cop
PP with the b.
Recap
Embedded Sentences
VP V S
Gromit ate the cheese. Wallace thinks Gromit ate the cheese. Wendolene said Wallace thinks Gromit ate the cheese.
Question: What kind of verbs can take a whole sentence as an object? Simple clauses (S NP VP) allow us to express propositions Clauses embedded in a VP (VP V S) allow us to express propositional attitudes: attitudes that people hold with respect to particular propositions (which may be real or fictitious)
Requirement for direct object comes from the specic verbs used
VP V NP VP V
New VP-Rules
ditransitive verbs VP V NP NP VP V NP PP
7a. Wallace gave the cheese to Gromit. 7b. Wallace gave Gromit the cheese.
VP VP
V NP V
8a. *Wallace donated the museum a rocket. 8b. *Marilyn mentioned Jack a secret.
12.
Ambiguity
The dog barked at the cat in the park Wendolene realized that Wallace likes Cheddar in the bathtub
Different VP Rules
Argument: VP --> V NP PP
VP
Modifier: VP --> VP PP
VP
V give
NP
PP
VP
PP
verb specic vs. verb independent non-recursive vs. recursive inside vs. outside minimal VP constituent
did so = put a book on the shelf d. *Sue put a book on the shelf, and Joe did so on the table. *did so = put a book
VP
PP
NP
PP
VP
PP
c. The cat chased the dog in the morning, and the ferret did so in the afternoon did so = chased the dog
NP
PP
VP V NP VP V VP V S VP V S S NP VP S S VP S Comp
Every NP has a N Every PP has a P Every VP has a V Every phrase has a head Except S and S?
John cried.
S
NP
VP
NP
Aux
VP
-ed auxiliary
John cried.
S
NP John
INFL (Past)
VP cry
NP John
INFL (Past)
VP cry
Lets look at this sentence as a phrase structure tree, and then see how the yes-no question transformation works: The man who is watching the Simpsons is laughing.
But first
We need a rule template that will generate the man who is watching the Simpsons Hints:
1. Think about our NP-modifier rule: NP --> NP PP 2. Lets call who a complementizer (like that/whether) 3. Remember that a sentence introduced by a complementizer in order to embed it inside a larger sentence is called an S
10
In is
In is
VP V
the man
the man
laughing
In is
VP V The man who is watching the Simpsons is laughing. The man who is watching the comedian who is impersonating Bush is laughing. The man is laughing at the comedian who is impersonating Bush.
the man
laughing
11
Do-support. You put in a dummy auxiliary entirely for the purpose of moving it to indicate a question
DO
Do-support. You put in a dummy auxiliary entirely for the purpose of moving it to indicate a question
Do-support. You put in a dummy auxiliary entirely for the purpose of moving it to indicate a question
12
Homework
Read Baker chapters on Language Variation Hand in Homework #2 Monday
The lexicon
Individual words dictate requirements for obligatory phrases (arguments)
Transformations
Rules for transforming basic sentences in systematic ways (yes-no question transformation)
13