You are on page 1of 84

Network

Analysis

Copyright Notice: Due to a policy of continuous product development and refinement, Schema
Ltd. reserves the right to alter the specifications and descriptions outlined in this publication without
giving prior notice of any kind. In addition, no part of this publication, taken as a whole or
separately, shall be deemed to be part of any contract for equipment or services.
Schema Ltd. retains the sole proprietary rights to all information contained in this document. No
part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted in any form or
by any means, including but not limited to: electronic, mechanical, magnetic, photocopy, recording,
or otherwise, in use now or in the future, without prior written consent from Schema Ltd.

Copyright 2010 Schema Ltd

AMERICAS 218 Route 17 North, Rochelle Park, NJ 07662


EMEA & APAC Kibbutz Glil-Yam, Herzliya 46905, ISRAEL

+1 (201) 556-3100

+1 (201) 556-9320

+972 (0) 9 961-1500 +972 (0) 9 961-1511

Network Analysis

Table of Contents
1
2

Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3
Premium RAN Services Overview....................................................................................... 4
2.1

Vodafone Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 5

Ec/Io Analysis .................................................................................................................... 6


3.1

Ec/Io Map ........................................................................................................................................ 6

3.1.1

Worst Ec/Io Cells (polluted cells) ........................................................................................................ 10

RSCP Analysis .................................................................................................................. 17


4.1

RSCP Map ...................................................................................................................................... 17

4.1.1

5
6

Pilot Pollution Maps ........................................................................................................ 28


Traffic Maps .................................................................................................................... 31
6.1
6.2

Worst RSCP Cells (Coverage Limited) ................................................................................................. 20

RNC 1007 ....................................................................................................................................... 31


RNC 1012 Istanbul ...................................................................................................................... 37

Analysis of Areas with Poor Quality and Coverage ........................................................... 39


7.1

RNC 1007- Antalya ........................................................................................................................ 39


st

7.1.1
7.1.2
7.1.3

7.2
7.3

RNC 1007 Konya ......................................................................................................................... 45


RNC 1012 Istanbul ...................................................................................................................... 47

CO-SC Analysis ................................................................................................................ 49


8.1
8.2

1 Area ................................................................................................................................................ 39
nd
2 Area ............................................................................................................................................... 41
rd
3 Area ............................................................................................................................................... 43

SC Reuse ........................................................................................................................................ 49
SC Planning .................................................................................................................................... 51

NL Optimization .............................................................................................................. 54
9.1
9.2
9.3

NL Recommendations Summary ................................................................................................... 54


NL Summary Report ...................................................................................................................... 54
Detailed NL Report ........................................................................................................................ 55

9.3.1
9.3.2

SUDEPO32931T-364713 (RNC 1007) .................................................................................................. 55


MR2UNV34021T-125972 (RNC 1012) ................................................................................................. 57

10 Overshooting Sectors ...................................................................................................... 58


10.1
10.2

Overshooting Sectors Tables ...................................................................................................... 58


Overshooting Sectors Examples ................................................................................................. 60

10.2.1
10.2.2

MDRZPS34941T-120814 (RNC 1012) .................................................................................................. 60


ORGNS342321T-310882 (RNC 1007) .................................................................................................. 61

11 Mobile Drop Analysis ...................................................................................................... 63


11.1
11.2
11.3

Drop Reason Drill Down for Speech .............................................................................................. 63


Worst Subscribers ......................................................................................................................... 64
Drops Due to Missing Neighbors................................................................................................... 68

12 KPI Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 70


12.1
12.2

CS Bad Quality Call Rate (%) .......................................................................................................... 70


CS Con Rel Offset (Source Cell) (%) ............................................................................................... 72

12.2.1
12.2.2
12.2.3

12.3

Case #1................................................................................................................................................ 74
Case #2................................................................................................................................................ 78
Case #3................................................................................................................................................ 80

CS RAB Crop Call Rate.................................................................................................................... 82

Appendix 1 Reports ................................................................................................................ 84

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 2 of 84

Network Analysis

Introduction

Schema Ltd. is pleased to present this Premium Ran Services report for Vodafone Turkey.
Schema is a leading global provider of advanced network optimization Software Solutions and Professional
Services for wireless telecom operators. Our products and services provide innovative solutions across all
2G, 3G, and 4G technologies, optimizing network performance and increasing profitability while enhancing
the end-user experience.
Schema understands the many challenges facing Vodafone in the current competitive, technological and
financial environments, and we appreciate the opportunity to help improve your network via our
Professional Services and software tools. We look forward to helping in any way that you deem
appropriate.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 3 of 84

Network Analysis

Premium RAN Services Overview

Schema is well known for its wide range of multi-vendor Optimization and Analysis products for wireless
operators. These products are all field-proven and deliver clear value to the operators. In the course of
developing and deploying these products, Schema has gained substantial experience in delivering related,
value-added services. The end-user experience and customer satisfaction have always been corporate
priorities and a strong focus of our ongoing customer relationships.
Schemas combination of technological excellence, cutting-edge tools, and hands-on engineering
experience uniquely positions us to deliver premium, value-added services to help RAN operators get the
most out of their investments in both infrastructure and personnel.
Schema delivers the following key benefits:

Real, measurable and ongoing improvement in network performance

Reduced dependence on infrastructure vendors

Improved processes and operational efficiencies

Comprehensive testing and optimization procedures

Optimal deployment of new technologies

Our Premium RAN Services include the following:

Network Audits

Network Optimization

Spectrum Management

Network Dimensioning

Product Implementation

Training and Consulting

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 4 of 84

Network Analysis

2.1

Vodafone Analysis

Schemas Premium Services team utilized the Mentor solutions advanced analysis capabilities to
uncover hidden problems in the network, based on usage and performance data collected from the
network.
Schemas proprietary geo-location technology transforms network call event data into maps that plot
Traffic, Ec/Io, Drops, Handovers, and other data for each location. Individual drop calls can be specifically
mapped and analyzed, and filtered on the basis of IMSI/IMEI, RAB type or drop reasons. It is also possible
to generate Excel reports, graphical layers, and maps using this information.
Analysis can be done per sector, site, group of sites, and cluster level - per time and date range resolution.
The powerful underlying data model enables analysis results in seconds.
These analysis capabilities, coupled with Mentors GeoMapping capabilities, deliver a visually intuitive
display of problems according to geography and other attributes.
The Drop Call Analysis Report pack includes all information relevant to analyzing network drop-rate
behavior, including a report showing the drop rate per sector, graphical maps showing the physical
location of drop hotspots, analysis of high contributing sectors, and analysis of drop reasons.
The following image shows an example of a drop call map. Each drop is geo-located and includes all
information about IMSI, IMEI, RAB, RF conditions, Neighbors, Active set etc. This example shows speech
drops due to poor RF conditions for cell YENHAL07841T-311074. Two cells are in the active set.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 5 of 84

Network Analysis

Ec/Io Analysis

The following section describes the in-depth analysis of the Ec/Io in RNCs 1007 and 1012. The analysis is
taken from the Mentor reports, based on real mobile measurements.
The input for the analysis is 11 days of logs with a total of 166,412,602 messages.
Bad Ec/Io is an indication of interference/poor coverage. Cells with bad Ec/Io may have poor data/voice
performance.
As part of the analysis, recommendations for improving the Ec/Io in the worst sectors were added.
The following files are attached: Stats RNC 1007 and EcIo Stats RNC 1012.

3.1

Ec/Io Map

Ec/Io Best Server: The best Ec/Io value is taken from each sample, and the average of all the samples is
displayed for each bin.
RNC 1012:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 6 of 84

Network Analysis

Ec/Io statistics RNC 1012


Best server Ec/Io Distribution, displays the percentage of messages for each specified Ec/Io value
Carrier 1:

Average Ec/Io: -6.37 db


Carrier 2:

Average Ec/Io: -6.79 db

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 7 of 84

Network Analysis

RNC 1007:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 8 of 84

Network Analysis

RNC 1007 - Konya:

Ec/Io statistics RNC 1007


Best server Ec/Io Distribution, displays the percentage of messages for each specified Ec/Io value
Carrier 1:

Average Ec/Io: -6.81 db

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 9 of 84

Network Analysis

3.1.1 Worst Ec/Io Cells (polluted cells)


RNC 1012:
Sector Name
TRKBLK34621T-123142
FKTHMC34831T-129353
ATASKV34211T-128331
ESTINO34111T-126111
SERASK34931T-125363
2KDKOY34A31T-125333
ATASKV34831T-128333
BSTGST34321T-120672
ULUSUW34921T-127752
Y2SYAK34321T-121882
MSTPZR34931T-120733
FETHMH34721T-126092
ICRNKY34111T-127351
CAKMTM34831T-126933
FETHMH34931T-126093
MRM3UN34011T-125951
SCEMER34931T-124943
KNTPLS34111T-128291
KYMRKZ34321T-123732
TACSPR34311T-127331

Cell ID
23142
29353
28331
26111
25363
25333
28333
20672
27752
21882
20733
26092
27351
26933
26093
25951
24943
28291
23732
27331

Mean
-10.245
-9.638
-9.582
-8.953
-8.773
-8.734
-8.728
-8.674
-8.568
-8.463
-8.403
-8.375
-8.292
-8.243
-8.209
-8.156
-8.136
-8.004
-8.004
-7.998

Cell ID
25805
20815
20817
28154
25806
20665
20946
25336
20664
20818
28156
25366
25343
21875
21115
24126
21584
21795
23665
21796

Mean
-9.376
-9.315
-9.218
-8.608
-8.603
-8.408
-8.197
-8.185
-8.155
-8.141
-8.139
-8.110
-8.108
-8.029
-7.984
-7.757
-7.706
-7.704
-7.603
-7.596

RNC 1007:
Sector Name
KUSDIL34621T-125802
MDRZPS34111T-120811
MDRZPS34631T-120813
KRSMP234011T-128151
KUSDIL34A31T-125803
FSZDNR34321T-120662
CFTHVZ34A31T-120943
2KDKOY34A31T-125333
FSZDNR34011T-120661
MDRZPS34941T-120814
KRSMP234631T-128153
SERASK34931T-125363
MUHURD34011T-125341
HPRTKL34821T-121872
MDCFRG34321T-121112
CM1TPZ34931T-124123
EREKOY34111T-121581
SISTYN34621T-121792
KDBHRY34521T-123662
SISTYN34931T-121793

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 10 of 84

Network Analysis

This section displays the top 3 cells with the worst Ec/Io analysis. Only cells with a high number of users
for speech and data (higher than average) were chosen. Analysis of all cells can be found in the files.
Ec/Io Stats RNC 1007, Ec/Io Stats RNC 1012
FKTHMC34831T-129353 (RNC 1012)
Ec/Io distribution:

Average: -9.64 db
Ec/Io map:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 11 of 84

Network Analysis

Recommendations:
Add missing neighbors
Source Sector Name
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353
FKTHMC34831T-129353

Target RNC
ID
1012
1021
1021
1021
1021
1012
1012
1021
1021
1012

Target Sector Name


KRSMP234321T-128152
KURBDR34011T-126601
GAZHAN34421T-120572
DM2PNR34831T-122913
SAKIZA34421T-126582
SCESME34A21T-126562
MDMRKZ34011T-123381
GAZHAN34111T-120571
KURBDR34921T-126602
MRM3UN34011T-125951

SC
307
59
254
388
163
252
188
253
60
104

Distance
(Km)
1.488
0.789
0.998
1.051
1.165
0.739
1.592
0.998
0.789
0.709

Neighbors plan:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 12 of 84

Network Analysis

ATASKV34831T-128333 (RNC 1012)

Ec/Io distribution:

Average: -8.73 db
Ec/Io map:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 13 of 84

Network Analysis

Recommendations:
1. Add missing neighbors
Source Cell ID
28333
28333
28333
28333
28333
28333
28333
28333
28333

Target RNC
ID
1012
1021
1021
1021
1012
1021
1021
1012
1012

Target Sector Name


KNTPLS34731T-128293
LIBADY34821T-125842
CAMSTR34611T-124971
N2KEML34321T-127432
UMRATA34821T-121162
BODRMC34111T-125831
LIBADY34611T-125841
YDUDUL34731T-123513
BLGRTM34111T-126101

SC
173
68
119
81
333
454
67
250
72

Distance
(Km)
1.529
4.039
5.473
3.354
2.140
4.583
4.039
1.814
3.695

Neighbors plan:

2. Tilt 1 deg

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 14 of 84

Network Analysis

ULUSUW34921T-127752 (RNC 1012)


Ec/Io distribution:

Average: -8.73 db
Ec/Io map:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 15 of 84

Network Analysis

Recommendations:
1. Add missing neighbors
Source Sector Name
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752

Target RNC
ID
1012
1012
1012
1012
1012
1012
1012

Target Sector Name


BYAZKN34731T-127323
YNSHRA34311T-120861
ICFNDK34111T-125201
TACSPR34311T-127331
GIRNCD34011T-127371
YDUDUL34211T-123511
Y2CMLC34821T-127792

SC
37
370
16
48
0
248
25

Distance
(Km)
2.586
4.702
2.814
2.215
1.932
2.529
1.509

Neighbors plan:

2. Tilt 1 deg

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 16 of 84

Network Analysis

RSCP Analysis

The following section describes the in-depth analysis of RSCP in RNCs 1007 and 1012. The analysis is taken
from the Mentor reports, based on real mobile measurements.
The input for the analysis is 11 days of logs with a total of 166,412,602 messages.
Bad RSCP is an indication of poor coverage. Cells with bad RSCP may have poor data/voice performance.
As part of the analysis, recommendations for improving the RSCP in the worst sectors were added.
The relevant files are attached.

4.1

RSCP Map

RSCP Best Server: The best Ec/Io value is taken from each sample, and the average of all the samples is
displayed for each bin.
RNC 1012:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 17 of 84

Network Analysis

RSCP statistics RNC 1012


Best server RSCP Distribution, displays the percentage of messages for each specified Ec/Io value
Carrier 1:

Average RSCP: -84.5 dBm


Carrier 2:

Average RSCP: -86.1 dBm

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 18 of 84

Network Analysis

RNC 1007:

RNC 1007 - Konya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 19 of 84

Network Analysis

Ec/Io statistics RNC 1007


Best server Ec/Io Distribution, displays the percentage of messages for each specified Ec/Io value
Carrier 1:

Average RSCP: -89.5 dBm

4.1.1

Worst RSCP Cells (Coverage Limited)

RNC 1012:
Sector Name
KUSDIL34A31T-125803
MSTPZR34931T-120733
TRKBLK34621T-123142
KYMRKZ34321T-123732
BSTCEB34921T-121662
ESTINO34111T-126111
YNCMLC34011T-127781
EMNALP34311T-124891
MDRZPS34631T-120813
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
OGRTMN34B31T-121763
BOSTNC34011T-121561
MDRZPS34941T-120814
G2ORNK34011T-127811
FBCAMI34111T-121731
GSGRLR34311T-125111
DDIMES34111T-127011
IMESGR34011T-127001
ORNEKT34721T-126132
ORNEKT34211T-126131

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

Cell ID
25803
20733
23142
23732
21662
26111
27781
24891
20813
23731
21763
21561
20814
27811
21731
25111
27011
27001
26132
26131

Mean
-101.207
-100.177
-99.325
-98.775
-98.650
-97.387
-96.928
-96.018
-95.518
-95.108
-94.829
-94.370
-94.280
-94.006
-93.572
-93.508
-93.447
-93.338
-93.311
-93.254

August 2010

page 20 of 84

Network Analysis

RNC 1007:
Sector Name
AKSORM07731T-310963
TURRES42521T-311312
YAYLAW07011T-311131
FINIKE07621T-310252
DOGRAS42B31T-311263
BOLSAN03731T-313063
KREMLN07721T-310482
SAKARY42011T-311351
DSMORG07011T-310221
KREMLN07111T-310481
BUSANS42521T-311272
BOLSAN03011T-313061
KOZLUK42011T-310711
ADAEVE07941T-310014
ORGNS342941T-310884
BURDTT15521T-364512
DOGRAS42411T-311261
BUSANS42831T-311273
YAYLAW07321T-311132

Cell ID
10963
11312
11131
10252
11263
13063
10482
11351
10221
10481
11272
13061
10711
10014
10884
64512
11261
11273
11132

Mean
-107.353
-101.672
-101.630
-101.020
-100.700
-100.041
-99.926
-99.916
-99.889
-99.872
-99.835
-99.739
-99.407
-99.394
-99.101
-98.987
-98.871
-98.732
-98.399

This section displays the top 3 cells with the worst RSCP. Only cells with a high number of users for speech
and data (higher than average) were chosen. Analysis of all cells can be found in files RSCP Stats RNC
1007 and RSCP Stats RNC 1012.
ULUSUW34921T-127752 (RNC 1012)
RSCP distribution:

Average: -98.65 dBm

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 21 of 84

Network Analysis

RCSP map:

Recommendations:
1. Add missing neighbors
Source Sector Name
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752
ULUSUW34921T-127752

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

Target RNC
ID
1012
1012
1012
1012
1012
1012
1012

Target Sector Name


BYAZKN34731T-127323
YNSHRA34311T-120861
ICFNDK34111T-125201
TACSPR34311T-127331
GIRNCD34011T-127371
YDUDUL34211T-123511
Y2CMLC34821T-127792

August 2010

SC
37
370
16
48
0
248
25

Distance
(Km)
2.586
4.702
2.814
2.215
1.932
2.529
1.509

page 22 of 84

Network Analysis

Neighbors plan:

2. Tilt 1 deg

KYMRKZ34011T-123731 (RNC 1012)


RSCP distribution:

Average: -98.65 dBm

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 23 of 84

Network Analysis

RCSP map:

Recommendations:
1. Add missing neighbors
Source Sector Name
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731
KYMRKZ34011T-123731

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

Target RNC
ID
1012
1012
1012
1012
1021
1012
1012
1012
1012
1017
1017

Target Sector Name


IMESGR34931T-127003
YNCMLC34421T-127782
YDACSU34A21T-123162
YDACSU34111T-123161
DOGNEV34221T-127022
BYRKTR34421T-121932
ELALMS34011T-126941
BYRKTR34A31T-121933
KYD2KV34821T-127742
FRPASA34721T-125052
KZGSLR34721T-121012

August 2010

SC
476
398
161
160
45
73
402
74
10
13
381

Distance
(Km)
2.057
0.813
2.100
2.100
3.262
2.458
2.661
2.458
0.368
2.987
3.012

page 24 of 84

Network Analysis

Neighbors plan:

2. Tilt 2 deg

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 25 of 84

Network Analysis

ORNEKT34211T-126131 (RNC 1012)


RSCP distribution:

Average: -93.25 dBm


RCSP map:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 26 of 84

Network Analysis

Recommendations:
Add missing neighbors
Source Sector Name
ORNEKT34211T-126131
ORNEKT34211T-126131
ORNEKT34211T-126131
ORNEKT34211T-126131
ORNEKT34211T-126131
ORNEKT34211T-126131
ORNEKT34211T-126131
ORNEKT34211T-126131

Target RNC
ID
1012
1021
1012
1021
1021
1021
1021
1012

Target Sector Name


INON2C34011T-130691
CAMSTR34611T-124971
FETHMH34931T-126093
BODRMC34111T-125831
FERAHC34611T-124981
KCMTNL34011T-120651
LIBADY34821T-125842
ATASEH34311T-121591

SC
253
119
125
454
120
21
68
155

Distance
(Km)
2.716
3.205
0.901
1.788
2.740
2.215
1.342
3.633

Neighbors plan:

This site should be checked for cross feeders or swapped antennas. The Azimuths do not look correct.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 27 of 84

Network Analysis

Pilot Pollution Maps

RNC 1007 - Antalya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 28 of 84

Network Analysis

RNC 1007 - Konya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 29 of 84

Network Analysis

RNC 1012 Istanbul:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 30 of 84

Network Analysis

Traffic Maps

6.1

RNC 1007

Traffic map All RABs


Antalya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 31 of 84

Network Analysis

Konya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 32 of 84

Network Analysis

Traffic map CS speech


Antalya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 33 of 84

Network Analysis

Konya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 34 of 84

Network Analysis

Traffic map HSDPA


Antalya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 35 of 84

Network Analysis

Konya:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 36 of 84

Network Analysis

6.2

RNC 1012 Istanbul

Traffic map All RABs:

Traffic map CS speech:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 37 of 84

Network Analysis

Traffic map - HSDPA:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 38 of 84

Network Analysis

Analysis of Areas with Poor Quality and Coverage

7.1

RNC 1007- Antalya

The following section describes areas with bad quality and coverage, where the traffic average per bin is
above 10 milliErlang. The maps were created using Mentors combined map feature, for the following
conditions:

7.1.1

1st Area

Poor coverage and quality map:


The poor coverage and pilot pollution situation will be solved after power up of the inactive sectors in the
area.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 39 of 84

Network Analysis

Pilot pollution map:


The maps were created using Mentors combined map feature, for the following conditions:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 40 of 84

Network Analysis

7.1.2

2nd Area

Poor coverage and quality map:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 41 of 84

Network Analysis

Pilot pollution map:


The maps were created using Mentors combined map feature, for the following conditions:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 42 of 84

Network Analysis

7.1.3

3rd Area

Poor coverage and quality map:


The poor coverage and pilot pollution situation will be solved after power up of the inactive sectors in the
area.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 43 of 84

Network Analysis

Pilot pollution map:


The maps were created using Mentors combined map feature, for the following conditions:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 44 of 84

Network Analysis

7.2

RNC 1007 Konya

Poor coverage and quality:


The poor coverage and pilot pollution situation will be solved after power up of the inactive sectors in the
area.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 45 of 84

Network Analysis

Pilot Pollution map:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 46 of 84

Network Analysis

7.3

RNC 1012 Istanbul

The maps were created using Mentors combined map feature, for the following conditions:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 47 of 84

Network Analysis

Pilot Pollution map:


The maps were created using Mentors combined map feature, for the following conditions:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 48 of 84

Network Analysis

CO-SC Analysis

Scrambling Code (SC) analysis and warnings are part of Mentors capabilities.
Mentor can analyze, fix, or plan SCs from scratch.

8.1

SC Reuse

RNC 1007:
Scrambling codes are not evenly distributed between cells.
SC 0, 1, 2 have 9 repetitions.
SC 13, 14 have 8 repetitions.
Most SCs between 0-110 have 2 or more repetitions.
Most SCs between 110- 511 have 1 repetition.
SC repetitions RNC 1007:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 49 of 84

Network Analysis

RNC 1012:
Most of the SCs have 1 repetition with some exceptions of 4 repetitions and more.
SC 496 has 7 repetitions.
SC 497 has 5 repetitions.
SC repetitions RNC 1012:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 50 of 84

Network Analysis

8.2

SC Planning

RNC 1007:
No significant SC problems were found in RNC 1007.
There was only one case of possible conflict when Mentor looked for new neighbor candidates.
Source sector BURDUV15111T-364571
During the logs period, when cell BURDUV15111T-364571 was the strongest, mobiles reported SC 9 1152
times. Mentor resolved this report as cell GAZICD15931T-364533 670 times, and 482 times it was resolved
as cell DEREMH32831T-364723. This might create a problem since Mentor recommends adding cell
GAZICD15931T-364533 as a neighbor to BURDUV15111T-364571.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 51 of 84

Network Analysis

RNC 1012:
Overall, Scrambling Code planning was good and no major issues were observed. However, tier 2
neighbors (neighbor of neighbor with same scrambling code as the source) were found. This issue should
be fixed but the impact expected in RNC 1012 is minor since in-building sectors are involved.
Tier 2 SC problems list:
SC

Source Sector Name


496 PLDAVM34I21T-122422
308 KRSMP234631T-128153
499 OPTAVM34I51T-122495
496 NIDAKL34I11T-125661
500 OPTAVM34I61T-122496
497 BGREEN34I11T-123041
496 BGREEN34I21T-123042
498 OPTAVM34I41T-122494
46 MDCFRG34631T-121113
498 MARIOT34I11T-122411
499 MARIOT34I21T-122412
498 OPTAVM34I41T-122494
500 MARIOT34I31T-122413
96 MR2UNV34021T-125972
498 MARIOT34I11T-122411
496 NIDAKL34I11T-125661
498 OPTAVM34I41T-122494
496 BGREEN34I21T-123042
306 KRSMP234011T-128151

Carrier ID Target Sector 1


1 MARIOT34651T-122415
2 SERASK34311T-125361
2 MARIOT34961T-122416
2 CNTRIM34011T-122355
2 MARIOT34961T-122416
2 CNTRIM34011T-122355
2 SAHCED34421T-120822
2 HSN2PS34211T-126571
1 SEHSVA34111T-133611
2 OPTAVM34311T-122491
2 TRIOKO34631T-121753
2 MARIOT34961T-122416
2 TRIOKO34631T-121753
1 KD3MRK34621T-121222
1 YESAEB34211T-127851
1 BSTCEB34511T-121661
1 KOZKVS34111T-121001
2 CNTRIM34011T-122355
2 ABADEM34421T-121542

Target Sector 2
NIDAKL34I11T-125661
SAHCED34731T-120823
MARIOT34I21T-122412
CNTRIM34I31T-122353
MARIOT34I31T-122413
CNTRIM34I41T-122354
NIDAKL34I11T-125661
DOGUSM34I11T-120631
GDKPA234111T-139281
OPTAVM34I41T-122494
OPTAVM34I51T-122495
MARIOT34I11T-122411
OPTAVM34I61T-122496
KD6YOL34011T-125271
OPTAVM34I41T-122494
BGREEN34I21T-123042
MARIOT34I11T-122411
CNTRIM34I31T-122353
SAHCED34011T-120821

The full list, including surrounding RNCs is in the file Tier 2 SC problems list.xls.
Example of a Tier2 SC problem in RNC 1011:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 52 of 84

Network Analysis

There are cases where Mentor had collisions resolving the SC.
Example of such a collision:
Source sector ATASKV34211T-128331
During the logs period, when cell ATASKV34211T-128331 was the strongest, mobiles reported SC 317
700 times. 350 times Mentor resolved this report as cell GZ2SYK34011T-128031 and 250 times it was
resolved as cell YEDPAS34011T-127771. This might create a problem when one of the cells is an existing
neighbor or a candidate for being a new neighbor as recommended by Mentor.

The full list of SC collisions is attached in file Potential SC problems RNC 1012.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 53 of 84

Network Analysis

NL Optimization

9.1

NL Recommendations Summary

RNC 1012 (carrier 1):


Neighbors to add 2321
Neighbors to remove 3589
Priority change 7122
RNC 1007:
Neighbors to add 2384
Neighbors to remove 1587
Priority change 5930
All detailed list of recommendations can be found in files NL recommendations RNC 1012 and NL
recommendations RNC 1007. Mentor can also prepare automatic scripts to easily implement these
recommendations.

9.2

NL Summary Report

The NL Summary report identifies sectors with the most significant neighbor changes. Below is a list of
sectors with high HO Rate Change %. For example, 20% Ho Rate Change, means that Mentor estimates
that more than 20% of potential handovers belong to missing neighbors. A full list is in file attached NL
Summary Report.
RNC 1012:

RNC 1007:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 54 of 84

Network Analysis

9.3

Detailed NL Report

The Detailed NL report contains Mentors NL Optimization results, per sector carrier.

This report contains neighbor list recommendations including:

Suggested NL sorted by new priority

Original neighbors that were deleted

Potential neighbors that should be added to the NL

The report includes separate tabs per carrier

The report may include source sectors within the following categories:

Optimized sectors regular cells that are part of the selection set and have enough
HO counts to be optimized

Non-optimized sectors changed only due to reciprocity:


o

External sector affected by reciprocity

Low count sectors

Inactive cells

Non-optimized sectors (outgoing is locked)

The following section provides examples of the sectors with high HO rate changes (%)and the new
neighbors added.

9.3.1

SUDEPO32931T-364713 (RNC 1007)

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 55 of 84

Network Analysis

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 56 of 84

Network Analysis

9.3.2

MR2UNV34021T-125972 (RNC 1012)

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 57 of 84

Network Analysis

10

Overshooting Sectors

Identification of overshooting sectors is based on access distance histograms. The full histograms can be
found in attached files Access distance histograms RNC 1007 and Access distance histograms RNC
1012.

10.1 Overshooting Sectors Tables


RNC 1012:

RNC 1007:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 58 of 84

Network Analysis

Top 10 over shooters:


RNC 1012:
Sector Name

Carrier

Average

Standard Deviation

MDRZPS34941T-120814

5651.895

2547.655

BSTSHL34621T-124902

5263.665

4488.656

2KDKOY34A31T-125333

4259.062

2518.163

SERASK34931T-125363

3790.357

1532.707

INON2C34421T-130692

2996.099

4298.403

INON2C34731T-130693

2330.756

4817.892

HPRTKL34821T-121872

2148.240

2218.382

YLDGRM34621T-125292

1695.613

3641.625

CM1TPZ34931T-124123

1600.502

3141.535

ARAPHC34011T-127841

1566.423

1695.678

RNC 1007:
Sector Name

Carrier

ORGNS342321T-310882

13364.401

7751.510

ELMLAN07621T-310232

11609.170

5831.088

BOLSAN03731T-313063

10913.140

6197.893

BOLSAN03321T-313062

9696.114

5430.471

ORGNS342011T-310881

9349.482

5839.550

IKBALW03111T-313071

8469.981

6165.844

OZGMAH15011T-364521

8125.161

8026.637

SIRINE15111T-364551

7942.207

8207.713

ORGNS342941T-310884

7737.346

4053.803

ELMLAN07831T-310233

7128.174

3369.542

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

Average

Standard Deviation

August 2010

page 59 of 84

Network Analysis

10.2 Overshooting Sectors Examples


10.2.1

MDRZPS34941T-120814 (RNC 1012)

Access Distance Histogram:

Traffic Map (all RABs):

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 60 of 84

Network Analysis

10.2.2

ORGNS342321T-310882 (RNC 1007)

Access Distance Histogram:

Traffic map (all RABS):

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 61 of 84

Network Analysis

Tilt Recommendations
Mentor uses a smart algorithm to identify overshooting cells that are candidates for tilt optimization. The
algorithm is based mainly on measurement reports collected continuously from logs (CHRs). Note that not
every cell with high access distance is a candidate for tilt. Tilt recommendations are based on traffic
distance but also on the amount and distance of the surrounding neighbors and the level of interference
created by the source cell.
Schema recommends considering implementation of 1 deg tilt as the first step. Afterwards, collect logs
and prepare a model in order to analyze the new RF environment. All tilt recommendations should be
reviewed by a local engineer in case of local limitations or problems that are unknown to Mentor.
RNC 1012:
IKRPLZ34311T-127341
USTGZT34311T-120711
INON2C34011T-130691
YNSHRA34311T-120861
KDBHRY34521T-123662
YESAHO34411T-128801
KD2SER34421T-130452
OPTAVM34311T-122491
INON2C34731T-130693
2KDKOY34A31T-125333
ATASTM34A31T-124523
HPRTKL34411T-121871
KYD2KV34A31T-127743
ATASKV34831T-128333
GIRNCD34011T-127371
TRIOKO34631T-121753
PLDAVM34411T-122421
MR2UNV34021T-125972
KOZKVS34111T-121001
MARIOT34651T-122415
YDUDUL34731T-123513
KRSMP234321T-128152
TACSPR34931T-127333
SAHDER34521T-121042
INON2C34421T-130692
KRSMP234631T-128153

RNC 1007:
PERGEB07A31T-311173
OZALKT42421T-311362
YENHAL07531T-311073
BAYIND07111T-310091
YENHAL07321T-311072
LAREND42B31T-310723
ORGNS342941T-310884
HILLSI07821T-310372
KONSVR07B41T-310463
NALCTT42011T-310681
NALCTT42A31T-310683
GECITM42211T-311291
KALEIC07931T-310423
RECEPG42821T-310702
BLIMAN07621T-310122
GOLDEN07111T-310281
HACIKY42211T-310791

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 62 of 84

Network Analysis

11

Mobile Drop Analysis

All drop analysis, including IMSI, drop time, location, reason, cell in active set, candidate neighbors, and
duration can be found in the files Drops Analysis Speech RNC 1012 and Drop Analysis Speech RNC
1007.
Drop reason analysis for speech - RNC 1012:

11.1 Drop Reason Drill Down for Speech

TIMER EXPIRED is the number one cause for speech drops in RNC 1012. The next phase is drill down to the
worst subscribers with this cause.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 63 of 84

Network Analysis

11.2 Worst Subscribers

Now we will focus on IMSI 286020305242673:

As we can see, all these drops occur during the SHO process, waiting for the ACK message.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 64 of 84

Network Analysis

From the Detailed Mobile Drop report we can see that all the drops occur when the mobile tries to add
sector IKRPLZ34311T-127341 to sector BIDOOT34211T-121821. The screenshot below demonstrates the
problematic neighbor definition.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 65 of 84

Network Analysis

When reviewing the NL recommendation for sector IKRPLZ34311T-127341, we see the following:
Source sector IKRPLZ34311T-127341:

Source sector IKRPLZ34721T-127342:

As can be seen, it appears we may have a wrong azimuth or cross feeder situation.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 66 of 84

Network Analysis

Another candidate for cross feeder or wrong azimuth is sector ULUSUW34411T-127751:

Drop reason analysis for speech - RNC 1007:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 67 of 84

Network Analysis

11.3 Drops Due to Missing Neighbors


In this section there is an example of drops due to a missing neighbor, as shown below.
Active leg SUDEPO32931T-364713
Candidate legs that are not in the current NL ISPUNI32A31T-364733, DAVRAZ32A31T-364743 and
BINBIR32941T-364774

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 68 of 84

Network Analysis

Mentor NL recommendation:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 69 of 84

Network Analysis

12

KPI Analysis

12.1 CS Bad Quality Call Rate (%)


CS Bad Quality Call Rate is the measurement of the number of calls that ended in normal release, but in
bad RF conditions.
In order to determine this, it is first necessary to find out what bad RF conditions are. In order to do so,
two histograms will be accumulated and equated against each other.
Histogram #1 will be the distribution of the Ec/No of the last measurement report of each CS call that
ended with normal release.
Histogram #2 will be the distribution of Ec/No of all the measurement reports of CS calls that ended in
normal release.
When equating both histograms, it is expected that in low Ec/No values histogram #1 will accumulate
more percentage. In order to determine the bad RF condition limit, it is necessary to find at which Ec/No
the percentage in histogram #2 surpasses the percentage in histogram #1. This will be the bad RF
condition limit.

Figure 1: Find the Ec/No in which the percentage in histogram #2 (all messages) surpasses the
percentage in histogram #1 (last message). In this case, it happens at Ec/No=-12.5dB.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 70 of 84

Network Analysis

Below is a list of the worst 20 sectors in RNC 1007:


Sector Name

CS Bad
Quality Calls
Rate (%)

MRATPA07731T-311083
AURALL07311T-310931
MRATPA07421T-311082
ALTSIN07841T-310564
BLIMAN07011T-310121
AUTEKN07621T-310942
ORUCIS03111T-313021
FABRMH07011T-310241
ADAEVE07941T-310014
GOROTE07111T-310291
YENHAL07531T-311073
FABRMH07931T-310243
AUTEKN07931T-310943
AURALL07621T-310932
AURALL07931T-310933
STADYM07431T-310033
AUTEKN07211T-310941
PERGEB07A31T-311173
ERENKY07531T-311013
ATACAD07421T-310082

18.09%
16.70%
16.21%
16.21%
16.17%
15.51%
15.05%
14.95%
14.73%
14.66%
14.44%
14.29%
14.23%
14.17%
13.95%
13.92%
13.88%
13.74%
13.47%
13.27%

Below is a list of the worst 20 sectors in RNC 1012:


Sector Name

CS Bad
Quality Calls
Rate (%)

CAKMTM34831T-126933
Y2SYAK34321T-121882
ATASKV34211T-128331
FBIYKT34521T-120697
ATASKV34831T-128333
FBIYKT34A31T-120698
ESTINO34111T-126111
MDRZPS34941T-120814
SISTYN34931T-121793
GIRNCD34011T-127371
2KDKOY34A31T-125333
KD2SER34421T-130452
CAKMTM34421T-126932
KNTPLS34111T-128291
ESTINO34A31T-126113
YN2SHR34B31T-122473
ATASKV34421T-128332
INON2C34011T-130691
YDUDUL34731T-123513
BKSFLR34721T-124622

31.62%
26.76%
23.05%
22.22%
21.76%
19.44%
18.74%
17.90%
16.60%
16.24%
15.83%
15.52%
15.31%
15.20%
15.17%
14.80%
14.35%
14.11%
14.06%
13.90%

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 71 of 84

Network Analysis

12.2 CS Con Rel Offset (Source Cell) (%)


Connection Release Offset - If any measurement on a detected set cell surpasses the
measurement of the best cell by 12dB, it is counted as a Missing Neighbor case for the source
cell.

Below is a list of the worst 20 sectors in RNC 1007:


Sector Name
AQLAND07011T-310051
AQLAND07721T-310052
AUTEKN07211T-310941
AUYURT07221T-310952
STADYM07431T-310033
AKINCI42A31T-310743
AUYURT07011T-310951
HILLSI07111T-310371
GECITM42211T-311291
AUTEKN07621T-310942
HVKVSK07721T-310362
KARBOS42831T-310863
HILLSI07B31T-310373
GLOGOL07011T-311621
BOSNAH42421T-310832
DEMKAV07A41T-311034
MASADA07621T-310512
UNIVER42821T-310872
HALIKV32011T-364761
PERGEB07111T-311171

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

CS Con Rel
Offset
(Source
Cell) (%)
2.25%
2.11%
1.83%
1.29%
1.18%
1.17%
1.14%
1.10%
1.08%
1.07%
1.06%
1.04%
1.00%
1.00%
0.98%
0.94%
0.94%
0.93%
0.90%
0.88%

August 2010

page 72 of 84

Network Analysis

Below is a list of the worst 20 sectors in RNC 1012:


Sector Name
2KDKOY34A31T-125333
ATASKV34211T-128331
MDRZPS34941T-120814
CKCMLK34521T-121832
YESAEB34521T-127852
KOZKVS34721T-121002
KZYATA34A31T-128063
ATASTM34211T-124521
BKSFLR34721T-124622
CAKMTM34421T-126932
YNSHRA34311T-120861
INON2C34011T-130691
YDUDUL34731T-123513
PLDRSD34I11T-122431
MARIOT34I21T-122412
HPRTKL34821T-121872
SUADYE34B31T-124833
PLDRSD34I21T-122432
KOZKVS34111T-121001
ARAPHC34011T-127841

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

CS Con Rel Offset


(Source Cell) (%)
11.83%
7.18%
4.38%
4.28%
4.12%
3.84%
3.50%
3.42%
3.11%
3.05%
2.99%
2.87%
2.63%
2.50%
2.47%
2.34%
2.21%
2.06%
2.04%
1.94%

August 2010

page 73 of 84

Network Analysis

The following cases present a sector with normal release for bad RF and high Con Rel Offset.

12.2.1

Case #1

Sector MRATPA07731T-311083
CS Bad Quality Calls Rate (%) = 18.09%
CS Con Rel Offset (Source Cell) (%) = 0.45%
CS Drop Call Rate (%) = 0.29%

Ec/Io Best Server map:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 74 of 84

Network Analysis

Ec/Io Best Server Histogram:

Access Distance Histogram:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 75 of 84

Network Analysis

From Mentor Drop Call Map:


Source sector MRATPA07731T-311083 is trying to add to the active set sector
YENHAL07011T-311071 because it is not in the NL of the source sector the call dropped.

Mentor NL Summary Report:

Mentor NL Report:
Target sector YENHAL07011T-311071 is missing from the NL. It has 18.3% HO rate, which
can be the cause of high drops for this sector.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 76 of 84

Network Analysis

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 77 of 84

Network Analysis

12.2.2

Case #2

Sector AQLAND07011T-310051
CS Bad Quality Calls Rate (%) = 12.56%
CS Con Rel Offset (Source Cell) (%) = 2.25%

Sector AQLAND07721T-310052
CS Bad Quality Calls Rate (%) = 5.26%
CS Con Rel Offset (Source Cell) (%) = 2.11%
Mentor NL Summary Report:

Mentor NL Report AQLAND07721T-310052:

Mentor NL Report AQLAND07011T-310051:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 78 of 84

Network Analysis

Sector AQLAND07721T-310052

Sector AQLAND07011T-310051

It seems from the Mentor NL suggestion that this site has the wrong azimuth or a cross feeder situation.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 79 of 84

Network Analysis

12.2.3

Case #3

Sector CAKMTM34831T-126933

CS Bad Quality Calls Rate (%) = 31.62%


CS Con Rel Offset (Source Cell) (%) = 1.36%
CS Drop Call Rate (%) = 0.45%

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 80 of 84

Network Analysis

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 81 of 84

Network Analysis

12.3 CS RAB Crop Call Rate


RNC 1007 Antalya:

RNC 1012 Istanbul:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 82 of 84

Network Analysis

HSDPA Drop Call Rate (%)


RNC 1007 Antalya:

RNC 1012 Istanbul:

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 83 of 84

Network Analysis

Appendix 1 Reports

Access Distance Histograms: Displays the number of calls initiated at specified


distances from the access sector.

Ec/Io Stats: Displays Ec/Io statistics for each of the carriers in the network.

RSCP Stats: Displays RSCP statistics for each of the carriers in the network.

Mobile Drop: Displays a detailed report of the dropped calls recorded in the selection set,
for all mobiles or filtered according to the mobiles' IMEIs or IMSIs, the drop reason or RAB
group. This report is defined by default.

APN Histograms: Displays the details of the APNs found in the network data.

Potential SC problems Displays list of collisions in SC resolved by Mentor.

Tier 2 SC problems list Displays list of cases where a neighbor of a neighbor has the
same SC as the source cell.

NL recommendations Displays list of recommendations for the intra-frequency


neighbor list.

Schema Confidential & Proprietary

August 2010

page 84 of 84

You might also like