CRD Publishing Horace Helms Holdings New Mailing Address

P.O. Box 86254 Tucson AZ 85754

520-413-2397 or 505-908-9498 Cell 520-668-9044 SKYPE Address: freeamerican69

See Clay do his show on Blog TV

at 7:00 to 8:00 AM Pacific

Now on Talk Stream Live!

Live on http://TalkShoe.com Host ID 87590 You can talk and chat on Talkshoe 7:00 AM Pacific 10:00 AM Eastern http://BlogtalkRadio.com

Clay will take calls 646-915-8774 http://www.blogtalkradio.com/claydouglas

http://talkshoe.com/ Host ID 87590

Upcoming Shows
Wednesday June 8 Thomas L. Rodgers http://LicenseToKill.us Thursday June 9 Eli James http://anglo-saxonisrael.com Friday June 10 Larry Pratt Gunowners of America

Todays Guest Tuesday June 7 Dr. Harrell Rhome http://gnosticliberationfront.com

The Platforms for the Presidency we should be demanding a Candidate support! It would solve the problem discussed below! The War on Drugs is a war against the American People! Oathkeepers feel the same way!

DECRIMINALIZING DRUGS A GOOD IDEA THAT PROBABLY WON'T HAPPEN

BY HARRELL RHOME, PH.D. 2 The War on Drugs is a fiasco and a failure. Even the name is a lie. It is not a war on drugs, but a war on the American people. This worrisome and wearisome war, if it really is to stop drugs, is a catastrophe. With our porous, essentially unguarded borders, we either cant or wont stop illegal immigration, drugs, terrorists or anything else. As far as controlling drugs once they enter the country, almost anyone who wants them, no matter where they are, can find them in a shockingly short time. Think about it. We cant even keep drugs out of maximum-security prisons, much less off the streets and out of our schools. Whats more, the drug war has filled our prisons with people who are not violent criminals. For decades, the Latin American drug producing nations have pointed out our insatiable national drug consumption and appetite, which is staggering. No one grows a crop unless there are consumers. This creates uncounted billions of dollars (and other currencies), into underground economies all around the world. In some countries, the drug trade is the number one source of income. Some countries have oil; some have drugs. There is heavy demand for both, and this is bound to continue. Countries with oil and drugs and other valuable resources are evertargeted for control by the New World Order Powers That Be. But, lets return to drugs and America. No matter how many expensive and often dysfunctional prevention and treatment programs are in place, they are evidently even less successful than the law enforcement approach. It is widely known that combined policing efforts stop maybe ten percent of the total volume. Many treatment programs would be happy with a 10% success rate! Without saying more, its clear that the elaborately organized and well -funded strategies of both law enforcement and treatment are not just failing, but

create additional problems. Weve spent decades futilely beating our heads against a wall of stone, never trying a new strategy. Isnt it time to venture out and try something new? What kind of private business could continue to operate with such a dismal record? Not yours or mine, to be sure. 3 But on the elevated and etheric levels where the Powers That Be commune, decisions are made differently from you and I. The PTB want things just as they are with the super-lucrative legal and illegal drug trade. New anti-drug strategies are introduced from time to time to pacify the public with the false impression that the misnamed War on Drugs is a serious enterprise. But on the national scene, practically no one who really matters seriously addresses these issues at all. From that alone, we can hypothesize that the PTB have things just as they want.
Latest Archived Shows CLICK ON THE NAME OF MY GUEST TO HEAR THE WHOLE SHOW. SEE THEIR SITE ON THE LINKS BELOW THEIR NAME. Tuesday June 7 Dr. Harrell Rhome http://gnosticliberationfront.com Monday June 6 Jesse Ventura Author of 63 Documents The Government Doesn't Want You To Read! Friday June 3 Bob Chapman International Forecaster Thursday June 2 What kind of Country Do we Have? Clay Douglas Wednesday June 1 We are putting the wrong people in Prisons! Clay Douglas Monday May 30 Joshua Daniels http://SeaLionsfoundation.com http://firstchoice2012.com2 Friday May 27 OathKeepers Thursday May 26 David Kaas Spinning Water and running for President! Fishman's Framework for Tax Reform

What is more, when required, critics and proponents of serious change are dealt with savagely. If you think Im exaggerating, just ask the families of the more than a few chiefs of police, judges, journalists, legislators, and their families from South America all the way to the U.S. border, blown up or gunned down in cold blood. No one is doing anything and there are reasons. First, why interfere with something so lucrative? And if you were to try, you or your family could be killed. Would most Americans and their officials take the risk? You decide. What would happen if drugs were decriminalized? Notice that the term is decriminalized, not legalized. However, legalization is also an option, and

drugs could be taxed and controlled in much the same way as alcohol and tobacco. Some states already monopolize liquor sales, so we would have both state-owned liquor stores and state-owned pharmaceutical stores. Both of the already legal dangerous drugs, alcohol and tobacco are more harmful and addictive than many banned substances. Why the hypocrisy? Lets deal with this honestly. Would more people use drugs? In the beginning, they might, but the faux War on Drugs doesnt deter anyone who really wants them. Almost always overlooked by the carefully controlled and contrived media is that the USA doesnt just have a problem with drug consumption. As are Afghanistan, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, et al, we are a drug-producing country. The largest cash crop in the USA and Canada is marijuana. And, we mustnt overlook Americas other druggie delight, methamphetamine, until just recently cooked up and sold in a neighborhood not far from you and me. However, this has all changed. Precursor chemicals can no longer be purchased in large quantities. Will these new laws decrease meth use? Actually, it could make it worse, with a purer and more potent product with secure distribution! The only real change is that meth manufacturing and distribution is now solidly in the hands of the cartels. A STATES RIGHTS ISSUE And, lets not forget the drug consumers. U.S. media and lawmakers never address the fact that our heavy demand for drugs is the basic problem, not the producers. What is more, we must honestly face the fact that a lot of people like drugs; otherwise they wouldnt use them! The horror stories, mostly in the local news, are about people that have very genuine and awful problems. Be that as it may, that does not fully describe Americas drug culture. Regardless of what we want to believe, occasional and casual users abound, throughout the various levels of society. I did a bit covert research and interviews; it was shockingly revealing! Anyone of any age can get drugs in spite of all the draconian and unjust laws. Minors surely shouldnt use drugs, but they shouldnt use alcohol and tobacco either. Yet they do, despite what the law says. Naturally, either legalization or decriminalization should keep strict laws in place protecting minors. But more and more consenting adults are saying they dont need the ever enlarging nanny state to determine what they do in their private lives. Others feel that, even though they do not use drugs, they oppose laws curtailing personal freedom. Medical marijuana introduces even more complexities, but no space for that now.

The fact is that the public is tired of the PTB lies. Remember the antidrug craze of the 50s and the Reefer Madness film, which was a big lie? All that happened was that drug usage got worse. Today, so-called drug resistance programs in schools are mainly a disappointment. One definition of insanity is the inability to stop repetitive self-destructive behavior. Does that describe us? There are many clear and cogent arguments against draconian laws, so no need to recapitulate them here. In addition, very logical legal arguments say that federal drug regulation is fundamentally unconstitutional. If that were actually to become a fact, then our basic questions are still valid, but the particular legal procedure would vary from state to state. My opinion is that this would be the proper way in the tradition of American personal freedom. Let each state decide whether to decriminalize, legalize, keep things the same, or make even stricter laws. While lives are lost and ruined by drug use, ineffective laws and harsh punishments ruin just as many or more. And, if you are so nave as to think that the prison system is actually correctional and really helps anyone, then you obviously have neither talked to anyone who has been inside the corrupt and ineffective system, nor spoken to a relative or close friend of someone caught up in that web of madness. Some nave and misguided folk seem to think that a little dose of jail might do some good. They are tragically and utterly wrong. There is little or no drug treatment or much of any other kind of rehabilitative care either. If you dont believe me, check it out. Prisons help virtually no one other than the PTB. America has a horrendous drug problem, and our domestic dilemmas almost always hurt others all around the world. Theres no time to deeply explore our national obsession, but read the words of that most expressive cybercolumnist, Barbra-renee Brighenti, who helped significantly by critiquing this article. Barbra-renee doesnt entirely agree, but dear readers, ponder these things. Here are truly profound words describing our confounding cultural conundrum. Drugs are used by society to anaesthetize its pain. Almost anything can be used and is used for this purpose. Why is the cou ntry in crises? Why do we need to anaesthetize? What is the pain? We use drugs, alcohol, sex, food, money, and power to kill the things we feel. Of course if this country wanted to clean up its drug problems it would be finished in a week. But on top of money, jails, etc, drugs are a great way to keep people silent, daydreaming, broken. Most tribes used drugs to get their warriors prepared to do terrible things we use everything as a drug perhaps to not feel the

terrible things we do. [Think Dresden, Iraq, Viet Nam, Palestine, Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc.] When I look at the food crises, the pharmaceutical drug crises, the legalization of even more violent-destructive substances is not something I would agree with. But then again it may help the whole culture 'hit bottom' quicker. Or we could take away all of the crutches and see where we are at? The PTB will make money either way - but you are debating only the method to keep drugs available, thus it is fait accompli that they are part of American culture, and that is sad. [From an email to the author; emphasis added.] barbra-renee@ebroadstar.com. In Mel Gibsons movie Apocalypto there is one scene that impacted me deeply. The high priest stands atop the sacrificial pyramid, saying: We are a people of great destiny. We are the masters of the universe. They were not, and neither are we. People of destiny? Of course we are, but have squandered our blessing? You see my answer. Whats yours? But what else would happen if some drug laws were eliminated and others were liberalized, in a rational way? Perhaps most importantly, major organized criminal syndicates, not to mention international terrorist organizations, would essentially be de-funded. Gangs would lose membership because a major source of their income would dry up. They are growing rapidly all over the country, and are a threat to national security. The ill-advised noble experiment with alcohol prohibition back in the 1920s is responsible for the rise of organized crime in this nation, and the drug wars have kept it well endowed ever since. If drugs were decriminalized, the crime rate would drop drastically, especially crimes of theft, burglary and robbery, crimes most often committed to buy drugs. But not just that if very little or no drug money is available to the cartels, the reform movements in a number of countries could solve a lot of problems and make a better world. If drugs were legally available, then there is no need to commit crimes to buy them. Nor would there be much of a need for illegal drug dealers. Consequently, the prison population would decrease rapidly, saving billions of dollars and future damaged lives. The police could concentrate on important crimes, and the money saved could provide the very best drug research and treatment programs, free of charge, for anyone who wanted them. WHY IT WILL PROBABLY NEVER HAPPEN The banking system has a substance abuse problem. That is, the international banking and trade cartels are addicted to drugs, or more precisely, to the handling and processing (a.k.a. laundering) of drug money.

They are dependant on this perpetual cash infusion. Back in the old days, Fr. Flanagan of Boys Town said there was no such thing as a bad boy. Now, money town says there is no such thing as bad money. Dirty money can be rehabilitated, recovered and be washed clean. Once funds are laundered, they are used just like any other money, i.e., invested to make more money. Such projects include shopping malls, resorts, hotels, banks, real estate developments, entertainment, new miracle drugs, you name it. When investors make money, it gets spread around the whole economy, but especially among the Powers That Be. Likewise, the prison industry is a huge corporate business, with more and more prisons built each year. Most are essentially slave labor institutions, producing products and services directly competing with private business. Did you know that? Certainly, law enforcement officials oppose any change, as most agencies are dependent on drug seizure money, which has become an essential and irreplaceable part of their budgets. There are other factors working against reform, but no need to belabor the point. The Powers That Be dont want change, so there will likely be none. What can you do? If enough reasonable, rational people of like mind start writing letters and calling their congress critters, perhaps at least some of the more extreme and draconian penalties could be eliminated. What is done today in the false name of fighting drugs is a sad, tragic and traumatic failure. Isnt it time to try something else? Yes, of course, but virtually no one other than the Libertarian Party, Congressman Ron Paul and a few others have ever stepped forward, but they and other progressives have little or no impact. As some of you may know, in the early 20th century, when drug regulations were first enacted, more than a few lawmakers and legal scholars opposed the whole thing on constitutional grounds. There is absolutely no precedent, they said, for the federal government to regulate drugs in any way. Thus, the 10th Amendment would have applied, leaving the matter up to the various states. Unfortunately, this rational and logical position was overruled and ignored. In spite of that, many states have implemented a more enlightened approach, even though the Feds never waive their ubiquitous powers to come in and do what they want regardless of what the citizens have decided in their own states. The whole subject of drug reform has been successfully demonized, but we can still hope that an increasing accumulation of open minds might have an eventual effect. With this type of article, there is always polarization; some eagerly agreeing, others vehemently disagreeing. However, if you are more or less in the undecided center on all of this, and are looking for new ideas and new

information, then it is you whom I primarily address. This is an issue that must be part of a national dialogue, with all points of views considered. Could Americans get together and solve some of this if repressive governments, hegemonies, corporations and cartels got their ugly hands off the machinery of decision-making? In the same vein, could countries currently saddled with drugs and corruption create a clean and honest society? In other words, without domineering governments imposing a dictatorial Brave New World/Animal Farm nanny culture, dictating our every move and thought, and without exploitative cartels sucking the peoples blood dry, could we actually create a freer and better world? Why not? Stranger things have happened. So what do you think? Readers are invited to correspond. Harrell Rhome is a freelance writer, with articles in both print and online publications, including The Nationalist Times, and is a Contributing Editor for The Barnes Review historical magazine. EagleRevisionist@aol.com