JAI C. R. REF.NO.: CUSTOMER : PART NO.

(WITH REV.NO)

CONTRACT REVIEW FORM

FORM NO. FM-03-03 DATE:

PART DESC : P.O. NO. :

(WITH LATEST MOD. STATUS)

FEASIBILITY REPORT NO. : I. TECHNICAL REVIEW : A. ENGG. SPECS. B. TOLERANCING STD C. MATL. SPECS. D. TECH. CAPABILITY II. QUALITY REQ. REVIEW A. SAMPLING METHOD B. TEST PROCEDURES C. REQ. OF TEST CERT. D. OTHERS III. PROCESS REQ. REV. A. MFG. CAPABILITY B. PROCESS INST. C. PKG. INSTRUCTIONS IV. COMM.REQ. REVIEW A. EXCISE FORM B. OTHER SP. REQ. V. DELIVERY REQ.REVIEW A. DATE B. SCHEDULES Pg. 1of3 REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COMMENTS

JAI

CONTRACT REVIEW FORM

FORM NO. FM-03-03

VI) CONTRACTUALS a) Approval of (by customer) i) FMEA (Prior to PPAP) ii) CONTROL PLANS iii) CONTROL PLANS (Unstable & Non Capable) iv) Acceptance Criteria (Visual Aids) b) Requirements of Customer : i) Prototype control plan ii) Special Characteristics (Process Sheets) iii) Customer Approved SubContractor iv) Customer Verification of SubContracted Product v) Preliminary Process Capability 1. Traceability vii) When Ppk not Achieved viii) Ongoing Process Performance ix) Control Plan Review (After Correction) x) Higher Or Lower Capability xi) Statistical Verification of Job Set Up xii) PPAP for Process Changes xiii) Appearance Item Designation xiv) Accredited Lab Facilities xv) Layout Inspection xvi) Functional Performance xvii) Measurement Data (Instruments) xviii)Additional Verification Stage xix) Packaging & Labels xx) ON LINE ASN Requirement xxi) Quality Records Evaluation

REQUIREMENTS

REVIEW COMMENT

*Refer pg 3 of 3 for desc./default values

SIGN OFF:

REVIEWED BY (CFT-LEADER) FOR JAMNA AUTO INDUSTRIES LTD . JAI CONTRACT REVIEW FORM PPAP REQUIREMENTS

CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVE Page 2 0f 3 FORM NO. FM-03-03

(TO BE ASSIGNED/MUTUAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CUSTOMER0

1. SUBMISSION LEVEL

II

III

IV

2. IS SUBMISSION REQUIRED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS : REQUIREMENT REVIEW COMMENT A. USE OF ALTERNATE MATERIAL B. NEW/MODIFIED TOOLS C.TOOL/EQUIPMENT REFURBISHMENT/REARRANGED D. CHANGE IN PROCESS/METHOD OF MANUFACTURE E. TRANSFER OF TOOL/EQUIP. TO DIFFERENT F. CHANGE OF SUB-CONTRACTORS G. PRODUCT RRELEASE AFTER 12 MONTHS H. CUSTOMER REQUEST TO SUSPEND SHIPMENT DUE TO QUALITY PROBLEM Pg. 3 0f 3 CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVE : *
i) Prototype control plan ii) Special Characteristics (Process Sheets) iii) Customer Approved SubContractor iv) Customer Verification of Sub-Contracted Product v) Preliminary Process Capability vi) Traceability vii) When Ppk not Achieved viii) Ongoing Process Performance ix) Control Plan Review (After Correction) x) Higher Or Lower Capability xi) Statistical Verification of Job Set Up xii) PPAP for Process Changes xiii) Appearance Item Designation xiv) Accredited Lab Facilities xv) Layout Inspection xvi) Functional Performance xvii) Measurement Data (Instruments) xviii)Additional Verification Stage xix) Packaging & Labels xx) ON LINE ASN Requirement xxi) Quality Records Evaluation Control plan at samle development stage JAI by defaulu identifies its own, if not specufied If customer suggests any sub-contractor from his approved list. To be specified in the P.O. Else taken as NA Defualt value >1.67 To be specified in P.O. Else taken as NA Default - Stringent Control Plan Default value > 1.33 JAIs Default - implement ed immediately Default value >1.33 Default - on control charts with n=3 Default Level - 3 if PPAP Manual NOT APPLICABLE Proposed to ISO Guide 25 JAIs Default - As described in Control Plan JAIs Default - As described in completion To be specified in P.O. Else taken a sNA JAIs defaulu as per Flow Chart To be specified by Customer - Or Else JAIs Default To be specified by Customer To be specified in P.O. Else taken as NA