Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A b s t r a c t / S u m m a r y ................................................................................................................2 I n t r o d u c t i o n ................................................................................................................................2 A i m s / O b j e c t i v e s ....................................................................................................................3 T h e o r y ...........................................................................................................................................4 A p p a r a t u s ....................................................................................................................................7 E x p e r i m e n t a l P r o c e d u r e ........................................................................................................8 R e s u l t s ..........................................................................................................................................9 S a m p l e C a l c u l a t i o n s .............................................................................................................19 D i s c u s s i o n s ...............................................................................................................................20 C o n c l u s i o n s ..............................................................................................................................21 R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s ..................................................................................................................21 R e f e r e n c e s .................................................................................................................................22 A p p e n d i c e s ...............................................................................................................................22
1|Page
ABSTRACT / SUMMARY
The main purpose of this experiment is to investigate the validity of the Bernoulli equation when applied to the steady flow of water in a tapered duct and to measure the flow rate and both static and total pressure heads in a rigid convergent/divergent tube of known geometry for a range of steady flow rates. The apparatus used is Bernoullis Theorem Demonstration Apparatus, F1-15. In this experiment, the pressure difference taken is from h1- h5. The time to collect 3 L water in the tank was determined. Lastly the flow rate, velocity, dynamic head, and total head were calculated using the readings we got from the experiment and from the data given for both convergent and divergent flow. Based on the results taken, it has been analysed that the velocity of convergent flow is increasing, whereas the velocity of divergent flow is the opposite, whereby the velocity decreased, since the water flow from a narrow area to a wider area. Therefore, Bernoullis principle is valid for a steady flow in rigid convergent and divergent tube of known geometry for a range of steady flow rates, and the flow rates, static heads and total heads pressure are as well calculated. The experiment was completed and successfully conducted.
INTRODUCTION
In fluid dynamics, Bernoullis principle is best explained in the application that involves in viscid flow, whereby the speed of the moving fluid is increased simultaneously whether with the depleting pressure or the potential energy relevant to the fluid itself. In various types of fluid flow, Bernoullis principle usually relates to Bernoullis equation.
2|Page
Technically, different types of fluid flow involve different forms of Bernoullis equation.
Bernoullis principle complies with the principle of conservation of energy. In a steady flow, at all points of the streamline of a flowing fluid is the same as the sum of all forms of mechanical energy along the streamline. It can be simplified as constant practices of the sum of potential energy as well as kinetic energy.
Fluid particles core properties are their pressure and weight. As a matter of fact, if a fluid is moving horizontally along a streamline, the increase in speed can be explained due to the fluid that moves from a region of high pressure to a lower pressure region and so with the inverse condition with the decrease in speed. In the case of a fluid that moves horizontally, the highest speed is the one at the lowest pressure, whereas the lowest speed is present at the most highest pressure.
AIMS / OBJECTIVES
1. To investigate the validity of Bernoulli equation when applied to a steady flow of water in a tapered duct.
2. To measure flow rate and both static and total pressure heads in a rigid convergent / divergent tube of known geometry for a range of steady flow rates.
2|Page
THEORY
The specific hydraulic model used in this experiment is Bernoullis Theorem Demonstration Apparatus, F1-15.
The test section, which is provided with a number of hole-sided pressure tapings, connected to the manometers housed on the rig, is indeed an accurately machined clear acrylic duct of varying circular cross section. The tapings allow the measurement of static pressure head simultaneously.
A flow control valve is incorporated downstream of the test section. Flow rate and pressure in the apparatus may be varied independently by adjustment of the flow control valve, and the bench supply control valve.
1|Page
Consider a system whereby Chamber A is under pressure and is connected to Chamber B, which is as well under pressure. The pressure in Chamber A is static pressure of 689.48 kPa. The pressure at some point, x along the connecting tube consists of a velocity pressure of 68.95 kPa exerted 10 psi exerted in a direction parallel to the line of flow, plus the unused static pressure of 90 psi, and operates equally in all directions. As the fluid enters chamber B, it is slowed down, and its velocity is changed back to pressure. The force required to absorb its inertia equals the force required to start the fluid moving originally, so that the static pressure in chamber B is equal to that in chamber A.
From the above illustration, Bernoullis principle relates much with incompressible flow. Below is a common form of Bernoullis equation, where it is valid at any arbitrary point along a streamline when gravity is constant.
...............(1)
1|Page
where: is the fluid flow speed at a point on a streamline, is the acceleration due to gravity, is the elevation of the point above a reference plane, with the positive z-direction pointing upward so in the direction opposite to the gravitational acceleration, is the pressure at the point, and is the density of the fluid at all points in the fluid. I f e q u a t i o n ( 1 ) i s m u l t i p l i e d w i t h f l u i d d e n s i t y , , it can be rewritten as the followings;
i s t h e piezometric head o r h y d r a u l i c h e a d ( t h e s u m o f t h e elevation z and the pressure head and is the total pressure (the sum of the static pressure p and dynamic pressure q). The above equations suggest there is a flow speed at which pressure is zero, and at even higher speeds the pressure is negative. Most often, gases and liquids are not capable of negative absolute pressure, or even zero pressure, so clearly Bernoulli's equation ceases to be valid before
2|Page
zero pressure is reached. In liquids, when the pressure becomes too low, cavitations occur. The above equations use a linear relationship between flow speed squared and pressure. Generally in many applications of Bernoullis equations, it is common to neglect the values of g z term, since the change is so small compared to other values. Thus, the previous expression can be simplified as the following;
.......(3) where p0 is called total pressure, and q is dynamic pressure, whereas p usually refers as static pressure. Thus, Total pressure = static pressure + dynamic pressure.......(4) However, a few assumptions are taken into account in order to achieve the objectives of experiment, which are as the followings:
The fluid involved is incompressible The flow is steady The flow is frictionless
APPARATUS
Water tank equipped with valves water controller Water hosts and tubes
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
1. T h e t e s t s e c t i o n t u b e i s s e t t o b e c o n v e r g i n g i n t h e d i r e c t i o n o f f l o w . 2. T h e p u m p s w i t c h i s o p e n e d . T h e f l o w c o n t r o l v a l v e i s t h e n o p e n e d a n d
the bench valve is adjusted to allow the flow through the manometer.
3. T h e a i r b l e e d s c r e w i s o p e n e d a n d t h e c a p i s r e m o v e d f r o m t h e
adjacent air valve until the same level of water in manometer is reached. The bench valve is adjusted until the h1 h5 head difference of 50mm water is obtained.
4. T h e b a l l v a l v e i s c l o s e d a n d t h e t i m e t a k e n t o a c c u m u l a t e a k n o w n
volume of 3L fluid in the tank is measured to determine the volume flow rate.
5. T h e w h o l e p r o c e s s i s r e p e a t e d u s i n g ( h 1 h 5 ) 1 0 0 a n d 1 5 0 m m w a t e r . 6. N e x t , t h e e x p e r i m e n t i s r e p e a t e d f o r d i v e r g e n t t e s t s e c t i o n t u b e .
1|Page
RESULTS
Convergent Flow
Pressure difference = 50 mm water Volume (m3) = 0.003 Time (s) = 46 Flow rate (m3/s) = 6.522x10-5 Distance Pressure No 1 2 3 4 5 head, h h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 into duct (m) 0.00 0.0603 0.0687 0.0732 0.0811 Duct area, A (m2) 490.9 x10-6 151.7 x10 109.4 x10-6 89.9 x10-6 78.5 x10-6
-6
Static Velocity (m/s) 0.1329 0.4299 0.5961 0.7255 0.8308 head h, (m) 145x 10-3 135 x 10 125 x 10-3 110 x 10-3 95 x 10-3
-3
1|Page
Pressure difference = 100 mm water Volume (m3) = 0.003 Time (s) = 31 Flow rate (m3/s) = 9.677x10-5 Distance Pressure No 1 2 3 4 5 head, h h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 into duct (m) 0.00 0.0603 0.0687 0.0732 0.0811 Duct area, A (m2) 490.9 x10-6 151.7 x10-6 109.4 x10 89.9
-6
Static Velocity (m/s) 0.1971 0.6379 0.8846 1.0760 1.2330 head h, (m) 170 x 10-3 145 x 10-3 125 x 10 100 x 10-3 70 x 10-3
-3
Time (s) = 25 Flow rate (m3/s) = 1.200x10-4 Distance Pressure No 1 2 3 4 5 head, h h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 into duct (m) 0.00 0.0603 0.0687 0.0732 0.0811 Duct area, A (m2) 490.9 x10-6 151.7 x10-6 109.4 x10 89.9
-6
Static Velocity (m/s) 0.2444 0.7910 1.0970 1.3350 1.5290 head h, (m) 190 x 10-3 160 x 10-3 125 x 10 90 x 10-3 40 x 10-3
-3
Divergent Flow Pressure difference = 50mm water Volume (m3) = 0.003 Time (s) = 30 Flow rate (m3/s) = 1.000x10-4
1|Page
Distance Pressure No 1 2 3 4 5 head, h h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 into duct (m) 0.00 0.0603 0.0687 0.0732 0.0811
Duct area, A (m2) 490.9 x10-6 151.7 x10-6 109.4 x10 89.9
-6
Static Velocity (m/s) 0.2037 0.6592 0.9141 1.1120 1.2740 head h, (m) 155 x 10-3 130 x 10-3 120 x 10 115 x 10-3 105 x 10-3
-3
Pressure difference = 100 mm water Volume (m3) = 0.003 Time (s) = 23 Flow rate (m3/s) = 1.304x10-4 Distance Pressure No head, h into duct (m) Duct area, A (m2) Velocity (m/s) Static head h, (m) Dynamic head, (m) Total head ho (m)
1|Page
1 2 3 4 5
h1 h2 h3 h4 h5
x10-6
Pressure difference = 150 mm water Volume (m3) = 0.003 Time (s) = 20 Flow rate (m3/s) = 1.500x10-4 Distance Pressure No 1 2 3 head, h h1 h2 h3 into duct (m) 0.00 0.0603 0.0687 Duct area, A (m2) 490.9 x10-6 151.7 x10-6 109.4 Velocity (m/s) 0.3056 0.9888 1.3711 Static head h, (m) 185 x 10-3 135 x 10-3 55 x Dynamic head, (m) 0.0048 0.0498 0.0958 Total head ho (m) 0.1898 0.1848 0.1508
1|Page
4 5
h4 h5
0.0732 0.0811
1.6685 1.9108
0.1419 0.1861
0.1869 0.2211
Using Bernoullis Equation Pressure Head (convergent flow) h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 Total Head, h (m) 0.1459 0.1444 0.1431 0.1368 0.1302 Static Head, hi(m) Va = [2g(hhi)]
Using Continuity Equation Duct Area, Ax106 (m2) Vb = Flow rate Q/ A 0.1329 0.4299 0.5961 0.7255 0.8308
Difference
Using Bernoullis Equation Pressure Head (convergent flow) h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 Total Head, h (m) 0.1720 0.1657 0.1649 0.1590 0.1475 Static Head, hi(m) 0.170 0.145 0.125 0.100 0.070 Va = [2g(hhi)] 0.1981 0.6373 0.8849 1.0759 1.2331
Using Continuity Equation Duct Area, Ax106 (m2) 490.9 151.7 109.4 89.9 78.5 Vb = Flow rate Q/ A 0.1971 0.6379 0.8846 1.0760 1.2330
Difference
Using Bernoullis Equation Pressure Head (convergent flow) h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 Total Head, h (m) 0.1930 0.1919 0.1863 0.1808 0.1592 Static Head, hi(m) 0.190 0.160 0.125 0.09 0.04 Va = [2g(hhi)] 0.2426 0.7911 1.0967 1.3347 1.5293
Using Continuity Equation Duct Area, Ax106 (m2) 490.9 151.7 109.4 89.9 78.5 Vb = Flow rate Q/ A 0.2444 0.7910 1.0970 1.3350 1.5290
Difference
Using Bernoullis Equation Pressure Head (divergent flow) h1 Total Head, h (m) 0.1571 Static Head, hi(m) Va = [2g(hhi)]
Using Continuity Equation Duct Area, Ax106 (m2) Vb = Flow rate Q/ A 0.2037
Difference
0.155
0.2030
490.9
h2 h3 h4 h5
Using Bernoullis Equation Pressure Head (divergent flow) h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 Total Head, h (m) 0.1786 0.1727 0.1574 0.1873 0.2156 Static Head, hi(m) Va = [2g(hhi)]
Using Continuity Equation Duct Area, Ax106 (m2) Vb = Flow rate Q/ A 0.2657 0.8596 1.1920 1.4510 1.6610
Difference
Using Bernoullis Equation Pressure Head (divergent Total Static Head, Va = [2g(h-
Difference
(Va-Vb)
1|Page
flow)
Head, h (m)
hi(m)
hi)]
Ax106 (m2)
h1 h2 h3 h4 h5
Figure 1 Graph of Total Head versus Pressure Head for Convergent Flow
Figure 2 Graph of Total Head versus Pressure Head for Divergent Flow
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Divergent Flow Pressure difference = h1 - h5 = 100 mm water Flow rate = 0.003/23 = 1.304 10-4 m3/s
Velocity, v =
= 1.304 10-4m3/s
1|Page
3|Page
DISCUSSION
Referring back to the objectives of the experiment, which are to investigate the validity of the Bernoullis equation when applied to the steady flow of water in a tapered duct as well as to measure the flow rate and both static and total pressure heads in a rigid convergent and divergent tube of known geometry for a range of steady flow rates. As fluid flows from a wider pipe to a narrower one, the velocity of the flowing fluid increases. This is shown in all the results tables, where the velocity of water that flows in the tapered duct increases as the duct area decreases, regardless of the pressure difference and type of flow of each result taken. From the analysis of the results, we can conclude that for both type of flow, be it convergent or divergent, the velocity increases as the pressure difference increases. For instance, the velocities at pressure head h5 at pressure difference of 50 millimetres, 100 millimetres and 150 millimetres for convergent flow are 0.8308 m/s, 1.5290 m/s and 1.2740 m/s respectively, which are increasing. The same goes to divergent flow, whereby the velocities are decreasing when the pressure difference between h1 and h5 is increased. Note that for divergent flow, the water flows form pressure head h5 to h1, which is from narrow tube to wider tube. Next, the total head value for convergent flow is calculated to be the highest at pressure head h1 and the lowest at pressure head h5, whereas the total head for divergent flow is in a different case where it is calculated to be the highest at pressure head h5 and the lowest at pressure head h1. There must be some error or weaknesses when taking the measurement of each data. One of them is, the observer must have not
1|Page
read the level of static head properly, where the eyes are not perpendicular to the water level on the manometer. Therefore, there are some minor effects on the calculations due to the errors.
CONCLUSION
From the experiment conducted, the total head pressure increases for both convergent and divergent flow. This is exactly following the Bernoullis principle for a steady flow of water and the velocity is increasing along the same channel. The second objectives, where the flow rates and both static and total head pressures in a rigid convergent / divergent of known geometry for a range of steady flow rates are to be calculated, are also achieved through the experiment.
RECOMMENDATION
Repeat the experiment several times to get the average value. Make sure the bubbles are fully removed and not left in the manometer. The eye of the observer should be parallel to the water level on the manometer. The valve should be controlled slowly to maintain the pressure difference. The valve and bleed screw should regulate smoothly to reduce the errors Make sure there is no leakage along the tube to avoid the water flowing out
2|Page
REFERENCES
B.R. Munson, D.F. Young, and T.H. Okiishi, Fundamentals of
Fluid Mechanics, 3rd ed., 1998, Wiley and Sons, New York. Douglas. J.F., Gasiorek. J.M. and Swaffield, Fluid Mechanics, 3rd edition, (1995), Longmans Singapore Publisher.
Giles, R.V., Evett, J.B. and Cheng Lui, Schaumms Outline
Series
Theory
and
Problems
of
Fluid
Mechanics
and
APPENDICES
2|Page