Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF HUMAN PERSONALITY MAC 611 This module is developed for learners to critically evaluate the theories of Human Personality and delineate their strengths and weaknesses. By the end of the course, learners will have a better understanding of the various explanations forwarded by psychologists as to why individuals behave as they do. Learners will also gain an opportunity to understand profile their personality types based on 2 prominent Personality tools and to gauge how these tools and theories can be used in a coaching scenario. At the end of the course, Learners will be able to: 1. To have an understanding of the different theories of personality that will encompass 4 major perspectives. 2. To have an awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of each perspective. 3. To be aware of their own personalities based on two personality tools and to gained an overall critical understanding of personality and its limitations in explaining human behavior. 4. To have an understanding of the application of the theories of personality
COURSE OBJECTIVES
LEARNING OUTCOMES
At the end of the course Learners will demonstrate: 1. Articulate the basic premises of the different theories of personality encompassing eight major perspectives. 2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each perspective. 3. Write about their own personal reflection on their personalities based on 2 personality theories.
None Selected readings that will be posted on MyAcel. Coming Soon Learners will be asked to take 2 online tests the Enneagram and MBTI as part of the course requirement. This is in aid of the learning and development of the student. Price: Enneagram: RM 50.00 MBTI: RM 80.00
1
(All written assignments must be written with clarity and in correct language) CLASS TIMES Tuesday 7pm 10pm Thursday 7pm 10pm Selected Saturdays 9am 12pm
Date Time Topic Notes
Teaching Week
11 June 1 13 June 2 3 18 June 20 June 22 June 25 June 27 June 4 2 July 4 July 6 July 5 9 July 11 July 6 16 July 18 July
7pm-10pm 6:30pm10:30pm 7pm-10pm 7pm-10pm 9am-12pm 7pm-10pm 6:30pm10:30pm 7pm-10pm 7pm-10pm 7pm-10pm 6:30pm10:30pm 7pm-10pm 7pm 10pm 7pm-10pm
Introduction to Human Personality and The Psycho-sexual world of Sigmund Freud The Shadow of Carl Jung and the Identity Crisis of Eric Erickson Facilitated by Vincent Chew (ICF Certified Coach) Reflection Paper 1 due Facilitated by Noor Abd. Wahab (MBTI Certified Trainer) Reflection Paper 2 due
ENNEAGRAM
MYERS-BRIGGS
The Unconditional Regard of Carl Rogers The Reinforcement of Skinner Albert Bandura and his Bobo doll FINAL EXAM (Proposed)
Reflection Papers:
2 Reflections Papers [25% each] Please refer to document: Reflection Papers MAC 611
COURSE OUTLINE POLICIES as at MAY 2013 Department of Psychology Policies Please note that the policies below apply to all students enrolled for this subject: BPsych students, BBusPsych students and ADP students. Students from other departments taking this subject as an elective are bound by all policies stated here except research participation and colloquium attendance.
1. Plagiarism note All students must use the APA citation style refer to the guide posted on My Acel. Plagiarism is defined as any unacknowledged use of ideas and material produced by someone other than the writer him/herself. Please note that you are NOT to submit an assignment that you have already submitted to a different subject, whether in the same or different semester All assignments must be submitted to Turnitin. Failure to do so will result in 0 marks for that particular assignment. The following rules apply: 1) Any information taken from any source must be cited. 2) If you copy the words (more than 3 words in the same sequence) from the source, this is called a direct quotation. Quotation marks must be used and this must be cited. 3) If you re-write or summarize the information in your own words, this is called a paraphrase. No quotation marks are necessary, but the source must be cited. Category Blatant plagiarism Description Complete paragraphs and/or sentences used without in-text acknowledgement Clear intent to plagiarize Action For cases of blatant plagiarism, students may be called before the Dept Assessment Investigative Committee (DAIC) consisting of the Head of Department and two Senior Lecturers. The following decisions can be made at the discretion of the lecturer and/or the DAIC: 1. 0 for assignment 2. F grade for the subject 3. Suspension from the BPsych program 4. Expulsion from the BPsych program In addition to this, all faculty staff will be made aware of the students who appear before the committee. Reference /recommendation letters will not be provided for these students. Maximum 50% of available points Lecturer discretion Student to be notified of action. This will be accompanied by a discussion/consultation on how the mistake can be avoided in future. Maximum 50% of available points Lecturer discretion Student to be notified of action. This will be accompanied by a discussion / consultation on how the mistake can be avoided in future.
Accidental plagiarism
One or two in-text citations omitted Quotation marks omitted Little or no evidence of intent to plagiarize Material is acknowledged but at best, the paraphrasing is only limited to a few words being changed Quotation marks are also not used) Little or no evidence of intent to plagiarize
Poor paraphrasing
3. Barring from Final Examinations Please note that effective from the Jan 2011 semester, for all Psychology subjects, students must attempt any assessment within the enrolled subject that is 10% and above, and obtain at least 10% of the total marks for that particular assessment. Failure to do so will result in the student being barred from Final Examinations for that particular subject. For example, for a subject that has the following assessment: Quizzes: 5% Assignment 1: 10% Assignment 2: 15% Mid-terms: 30% Final Exams: 40% If a student does not submit/attend any of the following: Assignment 1 / Assignment 2 / Mid-terms (and obtain at least 10% of the marks for those assessments), this student will be barred from sitting for the final examinations of this subject. E.g. if a student attempts Assignment 1 and receives only 8 marks out of 100 (or 0.8% out of 10% - i.e. less than 10% of the marks for that assessment), they will be barred from that subjects final examinations. Please note that students have to submit their assignments within 7 days of the due date (the 7 days include weekends). Assignments submitted after that will not be considered. (i.e. students who submit assignments later than 7 days after the due date will be barred from final exams) 4. Late Assignment Deductions Late submission of assignments will incur a penalty of 2% per day (24 hours) (including Saturdays and Sundays). This 2% deduction per day is incurred on the total percentage of the assignment. For example: Assignment 1, worth 20% of your total grade, is marked upon 100 marks. The 2% deduction per day is from the 20% and not from the 100 marks. If a student submits the assignment 2 days late = 4% deduction = student receives a 16% maximum for the assignment. 5. Compulsory Participation in Experiments (This policy applies to all BusinessPsych / BPsych students***) Please note that it is compulsory for every student to participate in 1 hour of research this semester: 1 hour in total for the whole semester, regardless of the number of Psychology subjects you are enrolled in (E.g, a student enrolled in 3 Psychology subjects and a student enrolled in 1 Psychology subject will have to participate in the same number of hours (1 hour) of research). Failure to do so will result in 2% being deducted from each Psychology subject that you are enrolled in. Please see the Head of Department if you are uncomfortable with attending experiments and would like to
7. Policy on Participation for Group Assessment 1. It is the policy of this department that when group assessments are assigned, each individual in that group holds the following responsibilities:
1.1
in the case of written assessment, to contribute to the finished product, be it presentation notes, a research report or a project report. This contribution may include archival research, drafting, editing or formatting.
1.3
1.4 1.5
2. Group members have a right to report fellow members for negligence if there are deemed to have failed in any of the responsibilities listed above. 2.1 Group members are encouraged to raise these complaints with their lecturers and attempts made to resolve differences before a formal complaint is lodged. Negligence (social loafing) reports can be filled in by one or several members of the group (see attached form) using forms that can be downloaded from the myacel site. Negligence reports should be submitted to the course lecturer who will then make a decision having investigated the issues raised. The group member accused will have an opportunity to defend themselves against the allegations made. If a student is found to be negligent in this matter, a lecturer can penalize them by deducting any amount of marks from their group assessment marks and/or their individual assignment marks.
2.2
2.3
2.4
8. Evaluations Every semester, there will be 2 evaluation processes for each subject: 1. Mid-semester evaluations: These evaluations are held in class and consist of 2 subjective questions. This is so that lecturers and tutors can receive feedback in the middle of the semester, in order to address student concerns and make improvements within the same semester. 2. Compulsory end of semester evaluations: These evaluations are conducted online and consist of Likert-scale questions as well as 2 subjective questions. The purpose of this is to obtain feedback that will be beneficial for future semesters. Students are strongly encouraged to fill in BOTH evaluation forms as feedback is important and can help the faculty make important decisions about the curriculum and the direction of the course.